If Windows Explorer try to re-connect to an unavailable share or other
ressource on the network it sometimes goes completely banana and try to
re-stablish the connection upon many file operations and window re-paints.
This is also true for the some of the FileSystem objects used by the latest
gener
John,
I just installed a new license for Acrobat 9 Pro Complete Version on my
computer here at work yesterday, and I noticed that the folder for the
program in the Program Files folder is a whopping 1.85 GB, containing 6,416
files in 882 subfolders.
Now you know why installation seems to take for
Does the message give the user the opportunity to accept or block the link? I
suspect it is a feature that is built into the PDF viewer.
Nadine
--- On Wed, 4/22/09, Pat Christenson wrote:
> From: Pat Christenson
> Subject: Links in PDFs created from Frame
> To: "FrameUsers List"
> Received
Does the message give the user the opportunity to accept or block the link? I
suspect it is a feature that is built into the PDF viewer.
Nadine
--- On Wed, 4/22/09, Pat Christenson wrote:
> From: Pat Christenson
> Subject: Links in PDFs created from Frame
> To: "FrameUsers List"
> Received
Hi all -
I have some Frame docs that include hypertext links to URLs. The
links work fine when I use Ctrl-Alt-click to check them in Frame.
Clicking the link in the generated PDF brings up a dialog that asks
you to confirm that you trust the destination website. Is there a
security feature
Hi all -
I have some Frame docs that include hypertext links to URLs. The
links work fine when I use Ctrl-Alt-click to check them in Frame.
Clicking the link in the generated PDF brings up a dialog that asks
you to confirm that you trust the destination website. Is there a
security feature
Lin Sims offered Eva some good advice on numbering:
> Remember when using a numbering string to provide it with a series tag
> (e.g., "H:" for headings) and to have the same number of blocks in
> each tag's string.
>
> That is, if your Heading1 is "1." and Heading2 is "1.1" and resets
> after ea
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Eva Whitley wrote:
> Well, after literally hours of work, I've managed to trace the problem
> to a bad second level heading that was causing the re-set. However,
> fixing it meant trying to re-do the autonumbering on the headings, and I
> just can't figure out how
Well, after literally hours of work, I've managed to trace the problem
to a bad second level heading that was causing the re-set. However,
fixing it meant trying to re-do the autonumbering on the headings, and I
just can't figure out how to structure the headings so Heading 1.1 in
Section 2 re-
Eva Whitley wrote:
> Well, after literally hours of work, I've managed to trace the problem
> to a bad second level heading that was causing the re-set. However,
> fixing it meant trying to re-do the autonumbering on the headings, and
I
> just can't figure out how to structure the headings so Head
Lin Sims offered Eva some good advice on numbering:
> Remember when using a numbering string to provide it with a series tag
> (e.g., "H:" for headings) and to have the same number of blocks in
> each tag's string.
>
> That is, if your Heading1 is "1." and Heading2 is "1.1" and resets
> after ea
I second Lin's solution!
I usually keep my autonumbering documentation on a table on a reference
page. This allows me to have access to it when using the file, rather than
remembering the last place I left the .xls file!
-Matt
Matt Sullivan
GRAFIX Training
m...@roundpeg.com
www.roundpeg.com
O
I second Lin's solution!
I usually keep my autonumbering documentation on a table on a reference
page. This allows me to have access to it when using the file, rather than
remembering the last place I left the .xls file!
-Matt
Matt Sullivan
GRAFIX Training
matt at roundpeg.com
www.roundpeg.co
Well, after literally hours of work, I've managed to trace the problem
to a bad second level heading that was causing the re-set. However,
fixing it meant trying to re-do the autonumbering on the headings, and I
just can't figure out how to structure the headings so Heading 1.1 in
Section 2 re-
Eva Whitley wrote:
> Well, after literally hours of work, I've managed to trace the problem
> to a bad second level heading that was causing the re-set. However,
> fixing it meant trying to re-do the autonumbering on the headings, and
I
> just can't figure out how to structure the headings so Hea
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Eva Whitley wrote:
> Well, after literally hours of work, I've managed to trace the problem
> to a bad second level heading that was causing the re-set. However,
> fixing it meant trying to re-do the autonumbering on the headings, and I
> just can't figure out how
Sometimes it takes my system several minutes just to delete a 2KB file
using Windows Explorer. I assume that the registry is being updated in
hundreds of places.
John Hedtke wrote:
> I'd find that utterly believable. I'm sure that my registry is full
> of junk. I've been thinking about doing
I would say that it's more common to the operating system. The more you
have going on in your background the more time Windows takes to do
installs. And my experience has always been for long install times on
Windows. I believe it to be a function of how the OS is structured and
the registry.
Yes. MacOS 10.5 + VMWare Fusion 2. Frame 8 works like a charm. You don't
need to run MS Office on virtual Windows. It exists in Mac version, but
there is no reason it shouldn't work.
And I'm talking about "real-world day to day production".
best,
Amnon.
Baruch Brodersen (Baruch.Brodersen at b
I can second Amnon's statement. It is stable, and fully functional. The
only caveat is that you need the maximum RAM to operate smoothly. The
good news is that if you purchase your RAM from a company other than
Apple you will be able to conserve on your expenditure. The RAM is
vital. You will w
If Windows Explorer try to re-connect to an unavailable share or other
ressource on the network it sometimes goes completely banana and try to
re-stablish the connection upon many file operations and window re-paints.
This is also true for the some of the FileSystem objects used by the latest
gener
Deletion of a file normally does not result in any registry modifications
whatsoever! When you delete a file, changes are made to the directory
entries and the space allocation tables on your disk partition. That should
be it. Taking "several minutes just to delete a 2KB file using Windows
Explorer
Deletion of a file normally does not result in any registry modifications
whatsoever! When you delete a file, changes are made to the directory
entries and the space allocation tables on your disk partition. That should
be it. Taking "several minutes just to delete a 2KB file using Windows
Explorer
Dear Framers,
Does anybody have experience running Frame and Frame utilities (FrameScript,
IXGen, MIF2GO, TimeSavers, etc) as well as MS Office on a Mac laptop through a
virtual Windows (middleware?) platform.
Is this doable/practicable in the real-world of day-to-day, grind it out
production?
Although the Acrobat 9 Pro installation does take a tremendous amount of disk
space
(of which nearly 725MB are the installation files so that Acrobat can "self
heal"
when there are problems), that does not account for the two hour installation
cited.
I have performed Acrobat 9 Pro Extended inst
Although the Acrobat 9 Pro installation does take a tremendous amount of disk
space
(of which nearly 725MB are the installation files so that Acrobat can "self
heal"
when there are problems), that does not account for the two hour installation
cited.
I have performed Acrobat 9 Pro Extended inst
Sometimes it takes my system several minutes just to delete a 2KB file
using Windows Explorer. I assume that the registry is being updated in
hundreds of places.
John Hedtke wrote:
> I'd find that utterly believable. I'm sure that my registry is full
> of junk. I've been thinking about doing
Yes, I understand. I really hate that "going off in mumble mode"
that Windows does so well.
John
___
You are currently subscribed to Framers as arch...@mail-archive.com.
Send list messages to fram...@lists.frameusers.com.
To unsubscribe send a bla
Yes, I understand. I really hate that "going off in mumble mode"
that Windows does so well.
John
I'd find that utterly believable. I'm sure that my registry is full
of junk. I've been thinking about doing a system reload and
reinstall for months, but I also know that it takes about 40-50 hours
of productive time to get the box back to the state I'd
wanted--reloading and reconfiguring all
I'd find that utterly believable. I'm sure that my registry is full
of junk. I've been thinking about doing a system reload and
reinstall for months, but I also know that it takes about 40-50 hours
of productive time to get the box back to the state I'd
wanted--reloading and reconfiguring all
I can second Amnon's statement. It is stable, and fully functional. The
only caveat is that you need the maximum RAM to operate smoothly. The
good news is that if you purchase your RAM from a company other than
Apple you will be able to conserve on your expenditure. The RAM is
vital. You will w
I would say that it's more common to the operating system. The more you
have going on in your background the more time Windows takes to do
installs. And my experience has always been for long install times on
Windows. I believe it to be a function of how the OS is structured and
the registry.
John,
I just installed a new license for Acrobat 9 Pro Complete Version on my
computer here at work yesterday, and I noticed that the folder for the
program in the Program Files folder is a whopping 1.85 GB, containing 6,416
files in 882 subfolders.
Now you know why installation seems to take for
I just re-installed Acrobat 9.0 Pro Extended off the Adobe TCS 2.0
and it took very close to two hours. Nope, nothing special, but the
histogram just s-l-o-w-l-y crawled across the screen and a mere two
hours later, it seemed to be done.
Is this normal for Acrobat 9.0 or for the Tech Comm Suit
I just re-installed Acrobat 9.0 Pro Extended off the Adobe TCS 2.0
and it took very close to two hours. Nope, nothing special, but the
histogram just s-l-o-w-l-y crawled across the screen and a mere two
hours later, it seemed to be done.
Is this normal for Acrobat 9.0 or for the Tech Comm Suit
Yes. MacOS 10.5 + VMWare Fusion 2. Frame 8 works like a charm. You don't
need to run MS Office on virtual Windows. It exists in Mac version, but
there is no reason it shouldn't work.
And I'm talking about "real-world day to day production".
best,
Amnon.
Baruch Brodersen (baruch.broder...@bigb
37 matches
Mail list logo
