> OK, be prepared to be surprised. Pull down the Image menu, go to Mode and
> gaze at the two entries "8 Bits / Channel" and "16 Bits / Channel."
> I've been using it for years; it ain't new.
> Yes, the Wikipedia article seems to verify what I was saying; that the same
> file can be referred to a
> OK, be prepared to be surprised. Pull down the Image menu, go to Mode and
> gaze at the two entries "8 Bits / Channel" and "16 Bits / Channel."
> I've been using it for years; it ain't new.
> Yes, the Wikipedia article seems to verify what I was saying; that the same
> file can be referred to a
Commenting only on specific issues...
>Art Campbell wrote (in part):
>>Color depth is generally specified as "bits per pixel (bpp)" -- see this
>>Wikipedia topic:
>>
>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_depth
>
>
>Yes, the Wikipedia article seems to verify what I was saying; that the same
>fil
Stuff cut in below...
On 5/5/06, Combs, Richard wrote:
> Like I said, I'm no expert, but I've never heard the term "8-bit" used
> to describe an image that uses 24 bits to define each pixel, and I'd be
> very surprised if Photoshop uses the term that way.
OK, be prepared to be surprised. Pull
Fred Ridder wrote:
> If this website is one of the places you have been learning
> from, then perhaps we have identified the root source of some
> of the issues. Even on a quick reading, this page contains
> some things that are laughably inaccurate. For one example:
Wow. An inkjet printer
Fred Ridder wrote:
> If this website is one of the places you have been learning
> from, then perhaps we have identified the root source of some
> of the issues. Even on a quick reading, this page contains
> some things that are laughably inaccurate. For one example:
Wow. An inkjet printer
Commenting only on specific issues...
Art Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (in part):
Color depth is generally specified as "bits per pixel (bpp)" -- see this
Wikipedia topic:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_depth
Yes, the Wikipedia article seems to verify what I was saying; that th
Art Campbell wrote:
> I think we're using slightly different terms when describing
> the same files.
> In photos/photoshop, an 8-bit depth means 8 bits of red,
> green, and blue info. 16 million shades (256X256X256). Which
> The color definition thing is really wierd. I never saw that
> ha
Stuff cut in below...
On 5/5/06, Combs, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Like I said, I'm no expert, but I've never heard the term "8-bit" used
to describe an image that uses 24 bits to define each pixel, and I'd be
very surprised if Photoshop uses the term that way.
OK, be prepared to be
Art Campbell wrote:
> I think we're using slightly different terms when describing
> the same files.
> In photos/photoshop, an 8-bit depth means 8 bits of red,
> green, and blue info. 16 million shades (256X256X256). Which
> The color definition thing is really wierd. I never saw that
> h
I think we're using slightly different terms when describing the same files.
In photos/photoshop, an 8-bit depth means 8 bits of red, green, and blue
info. 16 million shades (256X256X256). Which is what I think you're calling
24 bit, meaning 3x8 bits. Files come out of my Nikons at 12-bit depth and
I think we're using slightly different terms when describing the same files.
In photos/photoshop, an 8-bit depth means 8 bits of red, green, and blue
info. 16 million shades (256X256X256). Which is what I think you're calling
24 bit, meaning 3x8 bits. Files come out of my Nikons at 12-bit depth an
> Sadly, FM "reads" the color list from pngs (and AFAIK, *only*
> pngs), and adds the color definitions in the image file to
> the list of available colors in the FM file. It's very annoying.
And don't forget that you can't delete them with the color definition
thing where you can delete every
Annoying, yet brilliantly exacting. ;-)
On 5/4/06, Grant Hogarth wrote:
> Sadly, FM "reads" the color list from pngs (and AFAIK, *only* pngs), and
> adds the color definitions in the image file to the list of available
> colors in the FM file. It's very annoying.
--
Bill Swallow
HATT List Owner
esday, May 02, 2006 2:09 PM
> To: List, Framers; Free Framers
> Subject: A bug & note on using .png graphics
>
> I recently ran into a problem using .png graphics in files and after
> kicking it around a lot, think I may have found a bug either in FM's
> memo
Art Campbell wrote:
> Color list? You mean like FM's defined colors?
> I don't think so. We're talking digital photographs here,
> with millions of colors.
> The 8-bit limitation is just the bit depth of the file. FM
> doesn't do anything at all with the colors of graphics and
> the colors it
Art Campbell wrote:
> Color list? You mean like FM's defined colors?
> I don't think so. We're talking digital photographs here,
> with millions of colors.
> The 8-bit limitation is just the bit depth of the file. FM
> doesn't do anything at all with the colors of graphics and
> the colors it
May 04, 2006 1:57 PM
To: Grant Hogarth
Cc: List, Framers; Free Framers
Subject: Re: A bug & note on using .png graphics
Color list? You mean like FM's defined colors?
I don't think so. We're talking digital photographs here, with millions
of colors.
The 8-bit limitation is
16 million colors vs 256 for GIF
--- Jim Light <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So someone refresh my memory please, the advantage of using png
> files is what?
>
John Posada
Senior Technical Writer
"So long and thanks for all the fish."
___
You are c
16 million colors vs 256 for GIF
--- Jim Light wrote:
> So someone refresh my memory please, the advantage of using png
> files is what?
>
John Posada
Senior Technical Writer
"So long and thanks for all the fish."
-bounces+grant.hogarth=reuters@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-bounces+grant.hogarth=reuters.com at lists.frameusers.com]
On Behalf Of Art Campbell
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 2:09 PM
To: List, Framers; Free Framers
Subject: A bug & note on using .png graphics
I recently ran in
So someone refresh my memory please, the advantage of using png files is
what?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Anne Robotti
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 1:41 PM
To: Grant Hogarth; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: A bug & not
1:41 PM
To: Grant Hogarth; framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: A bug & note on using .png graphics
> Sadly, FM "reads" the color list from pngs (and AFAIK, *only*
> pngs), and adds the color definitions in the image file to
> the list of available colors in
> Sadly, FM "reads" the color list from pngs (and AFAIK, *only*
> pngs), and adds the color definitions in the image file to
> the list of available colors in the FM file. It's very annoying.
And don't forget that you can't delete them with the color definition
thing where you can delete every
Annoying, yet brilliantly exacting. ;-)
On 5/4/06, Grant Hogarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sadly, FM "reads" the color list from pngs (and AFAIK, *only* pngs), and
adds the color definitions in the image file to the list of available
colors in the FM file. It's very annoying.
--
Bill Swallow
4, 2006 1:57 PM
To: Grant Hogarth
Cc: List, Framers; Free Framers
Subject: Re: A bug & note on using .png graphics
Color list? You mean like FM's defined colors?
I don't think so. We're talking digital photographs here, with millions
of colors.
The 8-bit limitation is
m back up to 24 with
out making them too much bigger.
Grant
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Art Campbell
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 2:09 PM
To: List, Framers; Free Framers
Subject: A bug & note on using .png graphics
I recently ran
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Art Campbell
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 2:09 PM
To: List, Framers; Free Framers
Subject: A bug & note on using .png graphics
I recently ran into a problem using .png graphics in files and after
kicking it around a lot, think I may have fou
#x27;t have
> it!
>
> Nandini
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ridder, Fred [mailto:fred.ridder at intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 1:44 PM
> To: Nandini Garud; Art Campbell
> Subject: RE: A bug & note on using .png graphics
>
> JPEG is a very p
nal Message-
> From: framers-bounces+nandini=resonate.com at lists.frameusers.com
> [mailto:framers-bounces+nandini=resonate.com at lists.frameusers.com]On Behalf
> Of Art Campbell
> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 1:09 PM
> To: List, Framers; Free Framers
> Subject: A bug & note on
I recently ran into a problem using .png graphics in files and after
kicking it around a
lot, think I may have found a bug either in FM's memory managment
(surprise!) or the
way it's handling graphics files.
* FM 7.2 / 158
* Windows XP SP2 with all patches
* Two machines, one with 2 M RAM, one wit
me. I don't have
it!
Nandini
-Original Message-
From: Ridder, Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 1:44 PM
To: Nandini Garud; Art Campbell
Subject: RE: A bug & note on using .png graphics
JPEG is a very poor choice of file format for screen shots because it
02, 2006 1:09 PM
To: List, Framers; Free Framers
Subject: A bug & note on using .png graphics
I recently ran into a problem using .png graphics in files and after
kicking it around a
lot, think I may have found a bug either in FM's memory managment
(surprise!) or the
way it's h
frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-bounces+nandini=resonate.com at lists.frameusers.com]On Behalf
Of Art Campbell
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 1:09 PM
To: List, Framers; Free Framers
Subject: A bug & note on using .png graphics
I recently ran into a problem using .png graphics in files and after
kicki
f Art Campbell
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 1:09 PM
To: List, Framers; Free Framers
Subject: A bug & note on using .png graphics
I recently ran into a problem using .png graphics in files and after
kicking it around a
lot, think I may have found a bug either in FM's memory managment
(sur
I recently ran into a problem using .png graphics in files and after
kicking it around a
lot, think I may have found a bug either in FM's memory managment
(surprise!) or the
way it's handling graphics files.
* FM 7.2 / 158
* Windows XP SP2 with all patches
* Two machines, one with 2 M RAM, one wi
36 matches
Mail list logo
