Why are you using BMPs John? I work in both FM and Word and never use BMPs
for anything. BMP graphics are very large and unnecesarily bloat up the
Word doc. And from what I've seen, they don't give me any better pictures
than JPGs, or for that matter, GIFs. when embedded in Word.
Diane Gaskill
--- Diane Gaskill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why are you using BMPs John? I work in both FM and
Word and never use BMPs for anything. BMP graphics
are very large and unnecesarily bloat
up the Word doc. And from what I've seen, they don't
give me any better pictures
than JPGs, or for
The one change I dislike (read: that drove me insane) in FM 7.2 is the
way it handles PgUp/PgDown keypresses. In previous versions, using these
would take you to the next/prev page; in FM 7.2, you're taken to the
next/prev screen instead.
To change this, I added two lines to my customui.cfg:
Hello,
I'm sure someone out there can explain this one to me. This is just
an oddity I stumbled upon and
would like to know why this is happening. Here are the steps you can take to
duplicate what I'm seeing:
1. Create a table with a Heading row and a Footing row.
2. Open table
On Thu, 4 May 2006 04:31:00 -0700 (PDT), John Posada
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BMPs are an interim step. They are used by Mif2Go to create the
images imbedded in the Word files. They are not used in any of the
documentation
Right. For Word RTF, the only way to put in an image
that you can scale
Folks:
I'll soon go back to my day job and won't be able to sort through 30 e-mails
from all you wonderful chaps every day of the week. During such times I must
put myself off the frameusers list.
*But I don't want to miss anything!* A while back I discovered the archives
on the website. But
Sorry folks, don't need any hints.
Found the archives in the strangest of places. First one goes to ones
Account Homepage (which is unadorned in my case) and on the left are a
series of link options. Click on Modify your list subscription and there
at the top is the link.
My best to all
~ D.S.
Im talking about graphs where both the horizontal
and/or vertical axes have a linear array of marked
values, and the axis lines extend across the graphic.
In other words, the background of the graphic looks
like a FrameMaker table in which , consisting of rows
and columns in which all columns are
The only problem with that is that if they are less than 24-bit, FM adds
all the colors in them to your colors list. :( After taking them down
to 8 and saving them, you could probably take them back up to 24 with
out making them too much bigger.
Grant
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Color list? You mean like FM's defined colors?
I don't think so. We're talking digital photographs here, with
millions of colors.
The 8-bit limitation is just the bit depth of the file. FM doesn't do
anything at all with
the colors of graphics and the colors it defines it's a graphic
file
Alternatively, you can change your xrefs to Hyperlinks.
i.e.:
gotolink myfile.fm:mylink_01 and
gotolink ../myfile.fm:mylink_01
Are both valid links. (assuming that myfile.fm has the Hypertext marker
newlink mylink_01 g)
Working out the tree structure can sometimes be a pain, but it does let
you
Sadly, FM reads the color list from pngs (and AFAIK, *only* pngs), and
adds the color definitions in the image file to the list of available
colors in the FM file. It's very annoying.
-Original Message-
From: Art Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 1:57 PM
Annoying, yet brilliantly exacting. ;-)
On 5/4/06, Grant Hogarth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sadly, FM reads the color list from pngs (and AFAIK, *only* pngs), and
adds the color definitions in the image file to the list of available
colors in the FM file. It's very annoying.
--
Bill Swallow
Sadly, FM reads the color list from pngs (and AFAIK, *only*
pngs), and adds the color definitions in the image file to
the list of available colors in the FM file. It's very annoying.
And don't forget that you can't delete them with the color definition
thing where you can delete every
16 million colors vs 256 for GIF
--- Jim Light [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So someone refresh my memory please, the advantage of using png
files is what?
John Posada
Senior Technical Writer
So long and thanks for all the fish.
___
You are
I seem to remember some way of turning the smart spaces option
off by default in FrameMaker with the ini file. But I can't seem to
find out how to do it. Is it possible? Or am I just dreaming?
Rob
___
You are currently subscribed to Framers as
Ignore me... I forgot the setting is saved in the document, it's not an
ini file setting. Once changed and saved it is always true for that
document.
Rob
-Original Message-
I seem to remember some way of turning the smart spaces option off by
default in FrameMaker with the ini file. But
What would be nice is if you could make the default new document have it turned
on.
- web
At 11:24 AM +1000 5/5/06, Partridge, Robert wrote:
Ignore me... I forgot the setting is saved in the document, it's not an
ini file setting. Once changed and saved it is always true for that
document.
Rob
That setting should therefore be held in the template you base your new
document on. Our templates stupidly don't have it turned on, despite the
large number of code examples in our documents.
-Original Message-
Bill Briggs wrote:
What would be nice is if you could make the default new
You can. Using FrameMaker, open the file
FrameMakerInstallationDirectory\fminit\custom. This is a FrameMaker
file, even without the .fm extension. This file is used as the default
template. Change the smart spaces setting and save the file.
Ian
Bill Briggs wrote:
What would be nice is if
No such animal in the Mac install.
- web
At 7:39 PM -0600 5/4/06, Ian Hawkins wrote:
You can. Using FrameMaker, open the file
FrameMakerInstallationDirectory\fminit\custom. This is a FrameMaker file,
even without the .fm extension. This file is used as the default template.
Change the smart
I think we're using slightly different terms when describing the same files.
In photos/photoshop, an 8-bit depth means 8 bits of red, green, and blue
info. 16 million shades (256X256X256). Which is what I think you're calling
24 bit, meaning 3x8 bits. Files come out of my Nikons at 12-bit depth
Why are you using BMPs John? I work in both FM and Word and never use BMPs
for anything. BMP graphics are very large and unnecesarily bloat up the
Word doc. And from what I've seen, they don't give me any better pictures
than JPGs, or for that matter, GIFs. when embedded in Word.
Diane Gaskill
--- Diane Gaskill wrote:
> Why are you using BMPs John? I work in both FM and
> Word and never use BMPs for anything. BMP graphics
> are very large and unnecesarily bloat
> up the Word doc. And from what I've seen, they don't
> give me any better pictures
> than JPGs, or for that matter,
In older Acrobat versions, we could make a summary of the annotations.
This summary contained all annotations in a simple list.
In Acrobat 7, I can still make a summary, but it insists on using one
page for the annotations that apply to page X. So if each page has 1
comment, and I've got 10
The one change I dislike (read: "that drove me insane") in FM 7.2 is the
way it handles PgUp/PgDown keypresses. In previous versions, using these
would take you to the next/prev page; in FM 7.2, you're taken to the
next/prev screen instead.
To change this, I added two lines to my customui.cfg:
Hello,
I'm sure someone out there can explain this one to me. This is just
an oddity I stumbled upon and
would like to know why this is happening. Here are the steps you can take to
duplicate what I'm seeing:
1. Create a table with a Heading row and a Footing row.
2. Open
On Thu, 4 May 2006 04:31:00 -0700 (PDT), John Posada
wrote:
>BMPs are an interim step. They are used by Mif2Go to create the
>images imbedded in the Word files. They are not used in any of the
>documentation
Right. For Word RTF, the only way to put in an image
that you can scale (to match the
Folks:
I'll soon go back to my day job and won't be able to sort through 30 e-mails
from all you wonderful chaps every day of the week. During such times I must
put myself off the frameusers list.
*But I don't want to miss anything!* A while back I discovered the archives
on the website. But
Sorry folks, don't need any hints.
Found the archives in the strangest of places. First one goes to ones
Account Homepage (which is unadorned in my case) and on the left are a
series of link options. Click on "Modify your list subscription" and there
at the top is the link.
My best to all
~
Im talking about graphs where both the horizontal
and/or vertical axes have a linear array of marked
values, and the axis lines extend across the graphic.
In other words, the background of the graphic looks
like a FrameMaker table in which , consisting of rows
and columns in which all columns are
The only problem with that is that if they are less than 24-bit, FM adds
all the colors in them to your colors list. :( After taking them down
to 8 and saving them, you could probably take them back up to 24 with
out making them too much bigger.
Grant
-Original Message-
From:
Alternatively, you can change your xrefs to Hyperlinks.
i.e.:
"gotolink myfile.fm:mylink_01" and
"gotolink ../myfile.fm:mylink_01"
Are both valid links. (assuming that myfile.fm has the Hypertext marker
"newlink mylink_01" )
Working out the tree structure can sometimes be a pain, but it does
Sadly, FM "reads" the color list from pngs (and AFAIK, *only* pngs), and
adds the color definitions in the image file to the list of available
colors in the FM file. It's very annoying.
-Original Message-
From: Art Campbell [mailto:art.campb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006
Annoying, yet brilliantly exacting. ;-)
On 5/4/06, Grant Hogarth wrote:
> Sadly, FM "reads" the color list from pngs (and AFAIK, *only* pngs), and
> adds the color definitions in the image file to the list of available
> colors in the FM file. It's very annoying.
--
Bill Swallow
HATT List
> Sadly, FM "reads" the color list from pngs (and AFAIK, *only*
> pngs), and adds the color definitions in the image file to
> the list of available colors in the FM file. It's very annoying.
And don't forget that you can't delete them with the color definition
thing where you can delete
So someone refresh my memory please, the advantage of using png files is
what?
-Original Message-
From: framers-bounces+jlight=pillardata@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-bounces+jlight=pillardata.com at lists.frameusers.com] On
Behalf Of Anne Robotti
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006
16 million colors vs 256 for GIF
--- Jim Light wrote:
> So someone refresh my memory please, the advantage of using png
> files is what?
>
John Posada
Senior Technical Writer
"So long and thanks for all the fish."
Art Campbell wrote:
> Color list? You mean like FM's defined colors?
> I don't think so. We're talking digital photographs here,
> with millions of colors.
> The 8-bit limitation is just the bit depth of the file. FM
> doesn't do anything at all with the colors of graphics and
> the colors it
What would be nice is if you could make the default new document have it turned
on.
- web
At 11:24 AM +1000 5/5/06, Partridge, Robert wrote:
>Ignore me... I forgot the setting is saved in the document, it's not an
>ini file setting. Once changed and saved it is always true for that
>document.
>
I think we're using slightly different terms when describing the same files.
In photos/photoshop, an 8-bit depth means 8 bits of red, green, and blue
info. 16 million shades (256X256X256). Which is what I think you're calling
24 bit, meaning 3x8 bits. Files come out of my Nikons at 12-bit depth
41 matches
Mail list logo
