On Dec 22, 2007 1:27 AM, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given that this is just the proposal deadline, what's the point in being
so strict? If you are overloaded and/or have already done all the
reviews by the time the late submission takes place, so be it; but if it
costs you nothing
On Dec 18, 2007, at 9:44 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Tom Lazar wrote:
same here, unless you can work something out (perhaps together with
hanno) along the lines of the 'optional' migration steps that hanno
has
mentioned. i.e. folks could choose to include this update in 3.1 if
they
know
On Dec 16, 2007, at 3:31 PM, Martijn Pieters wrote:
On Dec 16, 2007 1:14 PM, Sidnei da Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
With all the cool new stuff going around, I completely forgot to
propose my own PLIP for 3.1 inclusion.
PLIP #187 is already implemented and can be merged with some small
On Dec 13, 2007, at 11:40 PM, Thierry Benita wrote:
Hi,
hi thierry, jean-nicolas,
I propose to include the File Preview feature in next plone release.
It is a non intrusive feature that doesn't need to migrate anything in
order to work out of the box.
hi all,
On Dec 22, 2007, at 12:37 AM, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
ps: i still got 4 votes to cast, but have to go offline, since i'm
occupying a room in which people want to go to sleep now... sorry
about that — i'll post my votes and do the bookkeeping in the morning.
here's a first summary
On Dec 21, 2007, at 12:51 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi guys,
hi there :),
How do you feel about a lite review bundle that basically is just
an instruction like Use ploneout 3.0 branch and svn switch src/
plone.app.portlets to the following URL? Perhaps it's a good
alternative for you guys
On Dec 21, 2007, at 3:31 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi,
hiya,
I just put some documentation on the implementation of PLIP 203 up
on the PLIP page (http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/203).
hmm, i'm probably missing something, but the implementation sections
of that plip is still empty
On Dec 14, 2007, at 2:02 PM, Raphael Ritz wrote:
Andreas Zeidler wrote:
[..]
The configlet would benefit all Plone installations, not just the
unified installer, so we should treat it separately.
true, +1. raphael, could you quickly write that up?
I would prefer if someone else could do
On Dec 14, 2007, at 9:56 PM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
Speaking of Timezone, did anyone write a PLIP about user-configurable
timezones? I've been meaning to write this for a while...
The only information I could find was this page:
Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Dec 21, 2007, at 3:31 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
I just put some documentation on the implementation of PLIP 203 up
on the PLIP page (http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/203).
hmm, i'm probably missing something, but the implementation sections
of that plip is
On Dec 22, 2007, at 2:59 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Dec 21, 2007, at 3:31 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
I just put some documentation on the implementation of PLIP 203
up on the PLIP page (http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/203).
hmm, i'm probably missing
On Dec 16, 2007, at 3:42 PM, Martijn Pieters wrote:
On Dec 15, 2007 9:25 PM, Alexander Limi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I won't have internet connnection until Monday, so I hope it's OK
that I
get the PLIP in then. Since this is more about the acceptance of
the idea
than delivering the
for the record, i totally second andi's approach re: the deadline
issue. it's a tricky dance, for sure and we must never forget that
we're dealing with voluntarily submitted offers of (often) hard work
which shouldn't be cast aside lightly, but then again, we do need a
timetable in order
Previously Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Dec 16, 2007, at 3:42 PM, Martijn Pieters wrote:
On Dec 15, 2007 9:25 PM, Alexander Limi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I won't have internet connnection until Monday, so I hope it's OK
that I
get the PLIP in then. Since this is more about the acceptance of
Hi all,
Just FYI in case you want to jump-start some of the reviewing of actual
code:
* PLIP 203 (portlet assignment import with GS) is complete:
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/203
I've asked the dev list what to do with portlet assignment *export* and
purge. I'd like some
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Dec 16, 2007, at 3:42 PM, Martijn Pieters wrote:
On Dec 15, 2007 9:25 PM, Alexander Limi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I won't have internet connnection until Monday, so I hope it's OK
that I
get the
After having waded through a big pile of plips I often (as a less
technical oriented member) had problems determining what the actual
usecase was that it was trying to solve. I would like to suggest (when
thechcnically possible) to add such a section in a plip. I'd like to
see a real-world
On 15 dec 2007, at 23:24, Danny Bloemendaal wrote:
On 15 dec 2007, at 21:25, Alexander Limi wrote:
Hi guys,
Just a quick email to say that I have been traveling (and without
internet connection :( ) since before the PLIP deadline.
The one I want in 3.1 isn't really a core thing as such
Sorry for the delay guys. I commented on all the plips.
On 22 dec 2007, at 12:22, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
hi all,
On Dec 22, 2007, at 12:37 AM, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
ps: i still got 4 votes to cast, but have to go offline, since i'm
occupying a room in which people want to go to sleep
Hi guys,
PLIP 184 is about adding new portlets. I've got two covered and mostly
complete:
- plone.portlet.static[1] provides static text with a Kupu widget
- plone.portlet.collection[2] provides a listing based on a collection
There's also talk of a find-and-render-document portlet, but
20 matches
Mail list logo
