Hi.
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> On 19 August 2010 09:52, Alec Mitchell wrote:
>> Though I voted against the inclusion of the UUID PLIP on it's own, if
>> the link-by-uuid PLIP makes good use of it, then it certainly could be
>> worth including.
>
> I'd like to work wi
On 19 August 2010 16:57, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Martin Aspeli
> wrote:
>> On 19 August 2010 09:52, Alec Mitchell wrote:
>>> Though I voted against the inclusion of the UUID PLIP on it's own, if
>>> the link-by-uuid PLIP makes good use of it, then it
Martin Aspeli wrote:
> [..]
>
> I wrote the PLIP because I'm uncomfortable with the status quo. People
> end up making their own half-solutions, e.g. using their own counters,
> physical paths (which are not stable), keeping their own BTrees of
> content, using zope.intid or faking up the UID() met
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Dorneles Treméa wrote:
> from his recent work on Canonical, I'm sure Sidnei has some great
> insights to share here, don't you Sidnei? :-)
We've been using YUI, so Y.Test as the test framework. We run tests
manually in the browser when debugging, but for automated
Le 19/08/10 12:29, Sidnei da Silva a écrit :
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Dorneles Treméa wrote:
>> from his recent work on Canonical, I'm sure Sidnei has some great
>> insights to share here, don't you Sidnei? :-)
>
> We've been using YUI, so Y.Test as the test framework. We run tests
> man
On 19 August 2010 23:24, Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
> First time I hear bad sound about Windmill. Happy that I am no the only
> one not convinced.
I hear "bad sounds" too from time to time, but no-one has yet been
able to tell me what the real problem is. I'd be quite interested in
any specifics.
On 9 August 2010 11:48, Laurence Rowe wrote:
> I've added a PLIP for separating out the optional dependencies from
> Products.CMFPlone: https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/10877
I've created branches and a PLIP buildout. For the time being the
optional dependencies are still in the Products.CMFPlo
Le 18/08/10 19:01, David Glick a écrit :
> Godefroid, I am definitely interested to learn from your experience in
> this area. Regarding functional testing of Javascript, would you
> recommend looking at KSS to see how it is done there, or are there newer
> best practices that have emerged since th
About a month ago, I spent some time with windmill, trying to do tests for
plone.app.jquerytools.
Windmill looked OK, but when I tried to automate the testing as a test case
with niteoweb.windmill, I encountered lots of problems and ended up giving
up on it. It looked like I was having trouble any
On 8/19/10 7:39 AM, Laurence Rowe wrote:
> On 9 August 2010 11:48, Laurence Rowe wrote:
>
>> I've added a PLIP for separating out the optional dependencies from
>> Products.CMFPlone: https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/10877
>>
> I've created branches and a PLIP buildout. For the time being
On 20 August 2010 00:26, Steve McMahon wrote:
> About a month ago, I spent some time with windmill, trying to do tests for
> plone.app.jquerytools.
>
> Windmill looked OK, but when I tried to automate the testing as a test case
> with niteoweb.windmill, I encountered lots of problems and ended up
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Hi Alec,
>
> On 19 August 2010 09:52, Alec Mitchell wrote:
>
>> Though I voted against the inclusion of the UUID PLIP on it's own, if
>> the link-by-uuid PLIP makes good use of it, then it certainly could be
>> worth including.
>
> I'd like
I should have added that I'm very enthusiastic about getting some JavaScript
continuous integration testing in place, and will happily learn whatever
framework we choose. We're getting way too much browser-side code to be
without systematic tests.
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Martin Aspeli
>
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Martin Aspeli
wrote:
> On 19 August 2010 23:24, Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
>
>> First time I hear bad sound about Windmill. Happy that I am no the only
>> one not convinced.
>
> I hear "bad sounds" too from time to time, but no-one has yet been
> able to tell me w
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Godefroid Chapelle
wrote:
> Le 19/08/10 12:29, Sidnei da Silva a écrit :
> Is JsTestDriver qUnit compatible ?
http://code.google.com/p/js-test-driver/wiki/QUnitAdapter
> Do you test multiple browsers or only Firefox ?
Only Firefox at the moment (Firefox account
On Aug 19, 2010, at 10:24 AM, Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
>
> Reason why I insist on automated tests. Functional tests run too slowly
> to rely on developers running them regularly. We need to delegate to
> Hudson or buildbot.
I agree completely.
I very nearly* have a Hudson/Selenium Grid/plone
Hi Alec,
On 20 August 2010 00:56, Alec Mitchell wrote:
>> I'd like to experiment with making the AT UID() and reference/UID
>> catalogs use plone.uuid as well. Certainly, that's where I'd like us
>> to end up. I just didn't want to be too ambitious with the PLIP in the
>> first instance, in case
Le 19/08/10 18:14, Eric Steele a écrit :
> On Aug 19, 2010, at 10:24 AM, Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
>>
>> Reason why I insist on automated tests. Functional tests run too slowly
>> to rely on developers running them regularly. We need to delegate to
>> Hudson or buildbot.
>
> I agree completely.
>
>
Hi Martin,
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Hi Alec,
>
> On 20 August 2010 00:56, Alec Mitchell wrote:
>
>>> I'd like to experiment with making the AT UID() and reference/UID
>>> catalogs use plone.uuid as well. Certainly, that's where I'd like us
>>> to end up. I just did
On Aug 19, 2010, at 12:32 PM, Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
> Le 19/08/10 18:14, Eric Steele a écrit :
>> On Aug 19, 2010, at 10:24 AM, Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
>>>
>>> Reason why I insist on automated tests. Functional tests run too slowly
>>> to rely on developers running them regularly. We need to
Le 19/08/10 22:44, Eric Steele a écrit :
>
> I wrote a new layer, mainly because I wanted to figure out how it all worked.
> I've put up a quick screencast of the whole thing in action, if anyone's
> interested. http://blip.tv/file/4023258
>
> Basically Hudson controls a Selenium Grid which dole
On Aug 19, 2010, at 5:46 PM, Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
> Le 19/08/10 22:44, Eric Steele a écrit :
>
>>
>> I wrote a new layer, mainly because I wanted to figure out how it all
>> worked. I've put up a quick screencast of the whole thing in action, if
>> anyone's interested. http://blip.tv/file
22 matches
Mail list logo
