of the discussion of the PLIP relates to other Link-
related proposals which appeared in an earlier revision of the PLIP
(but which have been already incorporated into Plone and thus edited
out of the PLIP.)
David Glick
Web Developer
ONE/Northwest
New tools and strategies for engaging people
it easier to also implement
calendar support for non-AT content.
David Glick
Web Developer
ONE/Northwest
New tools and strategies for engaging people in protecting the
environment
http://www.onenw.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
work: (206) 286-1235 x32
mobile: (206) 679-3833
Subscribe to ONEList
down for the sake of new people
coming on board.
By the way, have any deadlines been named for implementing the PLIPs
that were approved for 3.3?
[1]
http://plone.org/documentation/manual/plone-developer-reference/overview/release-process
peace,
David Glick
Web Developer
ONE/Northwest
New
have people in mind,
why not contact them directly and encourage them to submit a self-
nomination? Then a shy person would know that they are welcome, but
would still have to demonstrate some initiative.
David Glick
Web Developer
ONE/Northwest
New tools and strategies for engaging people
development
process should be PLIPped (or is that PLIPIP'd?), discussed, and voted
on just like improvements to the software itself.
David Glick
Web Developer
ONE/Northwest
New tools and strategies for engaging people in protecting the
environment
http://www.onenw.org
davidgl...@onenw.org
On Dec 28, 2008, at 5:37 PM, Martijn Pieters wrote:
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 23:19, David Glick davidgl...@onenw.org
wrote:
I am definitely interested in seeing more work on filling out the
holes in
GS support in core Plone.
If we include a tool for dump-and-reload content migration
/plone/ticket/8867
Credits
---
* David Glick
* Andrew Burkhalter
peace,
David Glick
Web Developer
ONE/Northwest
New tools and strategies for engaging people in protecting the
environment
http://www.onenw.org
davidgl...@onenw.org
work: (206) 286-1235 x32
mobile: (206) 679-3833
a validation error even
though someone is still editing. We'll port the fix for that issue to
the 3.2 branch and trunk regardless of the decision on PLIP 240 as a
whole.
peace,
David Glick
Web Developer
ONE/Northwest
New tools and strategies for engaging people in protecting the
environment
), then wondered if the complexity was worth it.
I can go either way, but would like to hear some other opinions of
best practice in a case like this.
peace,
David Glick
Web Developer
ONE/Northwest
New tools and strategies for engaging people in protecting the
environment
http
when someone has the
Redirect immediately to link target setting on, but the view doesn't
actually redirect because they have permission to edit the link.
David Glick
Web Developer
ONE/Northwest
New tools and strategies for engaging people in protecting the
environment
http://www.onenw.org
)
David Glick
Web Developer
ONE/Northwest
New tools and strategies for engaging people in protecting the
environment
http://www.onenw.org
davidgl...@onenw.org
work: (206) 286-1235 x32
mobile: (206) 679-3833
Subscribe to ONEList, our email newsletter!
Practical advice for effective online
to the Foundation board for official
nomination.
Cheers,
Hanno
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
David Glick
Web Developer
ONE/Northwest
New tools and strategies
for it these days though, it seems...
David Glick
Web Developer
ONE/Northwest
New tools and strategies for engaging people in protecting the
environment
http://www.onenw.org
davidgl...@onenw.org
work: (206) 286-1235 x32
mobile: (206) 679-3833
Subscribe to ONEList, our email newsletter!
Practical
isn't insane, at least in some setups.
I agree that it would be nice to have some more pre-baked scripts for
this though.
David Glick
Web Developer
ONE/Northwest
New tools and strategies for engaging people in protecting the
environment
http://www.onenw.org
davidgl...@onenw.org
work
(3), Ross (4), Matt (4)
unavailable: Andi (3)
I'm also available for the new team.
peace,
David Glick
Web Developer
ONE/Northwest
New tools and strategies for engaging people in protecting the
environment
http://www.onenw.org
davidgl...@onenw.org
work: (206) 286-1235 x32
mobile: (206) 679
to add-on developers
trying to figure out why their product broke or what the new way to do
something is. Creating a list of these changes is a task that should
be done as changesets are reviewed and merged from trunk.
David Glick
Web Developer
ONE/Northwest
New tools and strategies
On May 30, 2009, at 3:01 PM, Matthew Wilkes wrote:
On 30 May 2009, at 22:23, David Glick wrote:
Raphael raised a question about the consequences of backwards-
incompatible changes for add-on developers. Switching to a newer
Zope and CMF will indeed probably have some consequences
. The
main reason being that Zope 2.12 no longer has Zope 2-style
interfaces, and I believe CMF 2.2 is the first CMF release that
doesn't depend on them.
Note that CMF 2.2 hasn't actually been released yet. We'll have to
push for that to happen in a timeframe that matches ours.
David
/BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY.txt
David Glick
Web Developer
ONE/Northwest
New tools and strategies for engaging people in protecting the
environment
http://www.onenw.org
davidgl...@onenw.org
work: (206) 286-1235 x32
mobile: (206) 679-3833
Subscribe to ONEList, our email newsletter!
Practical advice
On Jun 22, 2009, at 2:14 PM, Matthew Wilkes wrote:
To confirm, are we meeting at 1800 UTC on #plone-framework tomorrow?
I am planning on it. Do we have an agenda other than general
discussion of the submitted PLIPs and scope of 4.0?
David Glick
Web Developer
ONE/Northwest
New tools
that images are linked in a document)
- make sure release notes, etc, are up to date
Assistance welcome!
David Glick
Web Developer
ONE/Northwest
New tools and strategies for engaging people in protecting the
environment
http://www.onenw.org
davidgl...@onenw.org
work: (206) 286-1235 x32
that change.
David Glick
Web Developer
ONE/Northwest
New tools and strategies for engaging people in protecting the
environment
http://www.onenw.org
davidgl...@onenw.org
work: (206) 286-1235 x32
mobile: (206) 679-3833
Subscribe to ONEList, our email newsletter!
Practical advice for effective
that I'm in the reviewer's chair I'd certainly find it
helpful to have this sort of information from others.
David Glick
Web Developer
ONE/Northwest
New tools and strategies for engaging people in protecting the
environment
http://www.onenw.org
davidgl...@onenw.org
work: (206) 286-1235 x32
that I'm in the reviewer's chair I'd certainly find it
helpful to have this sort of information from others.
David Glick
Web Developer
ONE/Northwest
New tools and strategies for engaging people in protecting the
environment
http://www.onenw.org
davidgl...@onenw.org
work: (206) 286-1235 x32
thorough testing.
Actually Hanno did the work here, and I just copied it :)
* IPublishTraverse is used where ITraverse should be; that's why some
linkintegrity tests are failing.
Actually they both need to be used. And that's just a guess -- I
haven't actually looked at this yet.
David
://svn.plone.org/svn/plone/plone.app.imaging/trunk/src/plone/app/imaging/traverse.py
-- but this ImageTraverser isn't actually registered anywhere yet).
David Glick
Web Developer
ONE/Northwest
New tools and strategies for engaging people in protecting the
environment
http://www.onenw.org
-party products that
rely on being able to traverse to image scales the old way?
I haven't tested, but I presume that anything which does something like
tal:block tal:condition=exists:context/image_thumb
tal:replace=structure python:context.tag(scale='thumb')/
would break.
David Glick
Web
). Is there any factor blocking progress on
reviews that we can help with? Even a partial review (e.g. focusing
only on certain aspects of the code or only on the user experience) of
a single PLIP would help us make progress.
thanks,
David Glick
Web Developer
ONE/Northwest
New tools
Maurits van Rees wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 09:41:34PM -0400, Eric Steele wrote:
On Sep 24, 2009, at 9:03 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Eric Steele wrote:
FWT!,
It's final review time for 4.0. We currently have 6 PLIPs awaiting
final review and merge vote:
9186Set Image IDs from Title
Thought the framework team might be interested in my notes on
plone.app.discussion from a user / site admin perspective, since it
didn't really get a full review during the 4.0 PLIP process.
David
David Glick wrote:
Hey Timo!
Just spent a while playing with plone.app.discussion to evaluate
David Glick wrote:
Man, I even vaguely remember seeing that changelog entry go by, but
completely forgot about it. We've been using
parts/instance/bin/runzope with supervisord; this is better.
David
I worded that ambiguously. I meant that using bin/instance console is
better.
David
delete the Plone directory it created.
David
--
David Glick
Web Developer
Groundwire
206.286.1235x32
davidgl...@groundwire.org
http://groundwire.org
ONE/Northwest is now Groundwire!
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http
On Mar 12, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net
wrote:
On 2010-3-12 19:37, David Glick wrote:
On 3/12/10 10:22 AM, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010, Alexander Limi wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Eric Steeleems...@psu.edu
wrote:
On Mar 11, 2010
to be some form of intermediate layer in between, but I don't
care what it is.
-1 on this, which feels like change just for change's sake -- unless
it's really clear it makes the code more readable.
David
--
David Glick
Web Developer
Groundwire
206.286.1235x32
davidgl...@groundwire.org
http
not clear to me that there is one best practice, or at
least not one that is best in all circumstances.
David
--
David Glick
Web Developer
Groundwire
206.286.1235x32
davidgl...@groundwire.org
http://groundwire.org
ONE/Northwest is now Groundwire
--
David Glick
Web Developer
Groundwire
206.286.1235x32
davidgl...@groundwire.org
http://groundwire.org
Sign up for Groundwire News!
Tips, tools and news delivered directly to your inbox.
http://groundwire.org/news-signup
___
Framework-Team mailing
On 5/20/10 12:58 PM, Eric Steele wrote:
The main issues I'd like to see fixed and released before we move to RC are:
#10549 - Uncaught NotFound exception in plone.app.linkintegrity when page
contains some @@{view} links
Fixed.
--
David Glick
Web Developer
Groundwire
206.286.1235x32
properly configured blob-storage in
their buildout. The migration itself is pretty well-tested, at least
under Plone 3 -- Groundwire has migrated dozens of sites to use blobs.
There may be some other concern I am forgetting?
David
--
David Glick
Web Developer
Groundwire
206.286.1235x32
davidgl
and possibly other packages, but that's a
Wichert's call!... :-)
Remember the established procedure...if you want a new release of some
package to be included in the next Plone 3.3.x, ask someone who has
rights to it on pypi to make a release and notify Wichert.
David
--
David Glick
Web Developer
.
What's the process here? I assume it's a free vote regardless of if people
are new or willing to return, in which case should those of us already on a
FWT and willing to return keep off the list?
It is open to folks who 1) have not been nominated
David
--
David Glick
Web Developer
Hello framework team,
I'd like to officially submit the following PLIP for consideration for Plone
4.1: https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/10878
thanks!
David Glick
Web Developer
davidgl...@groundwire.org
206.286.1235x32
[http://gw-logo.s3.amazonaws.com/groundwire-logo-270-noclear.png]http
KSS optional
I will need assistance to complete the implementation for #10888.
Anyone (particularly someone with JQuery experience) interested?
thanks,
David
--
David Glick
Web Developer
davidgl...@groundwire.org
206.286.1235x32
Groundwire: You Are Connected
that is easier to learn).
--
David Glick
Web Developer
davidgl...@groundwire.org
206.286.1235x32
Groundwire: You Are Connected
http://groundwire.org
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
interested to learn from your experience in
this area. Regarding functional testing of Javascript, would you
recommend looking at KSS to see how it is done there, or are there newer
best practices that have emerged since those tests were written?
peace,
--
David Glick
Web Developer
- Present: all except Ross Patterson (excused). David Glick sat in to
take minutes.
- Discussing PLIPs that were held or not discussed last week.
- 10778: Standalone UUID implementation
- lots of discussion on the mailing list since last time
- agreement that it is a goal for all content
On 8/24/10 2:02 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:57 PM, David Glick davidgl...@groundwire.org
wrote:
- Scheduling
- Final PLIP submission deadline is next Friday, Aug. 30
- Six week PLIP implementation period beginning on the submission
deadline and ending
On 8/25/10 1:49 AM, Maurits van Rees wrote:
Op 24-08-10 21:57, David Glick schreef:
- Scheduling
- Final PLIP submission deadline is next Friday, Aug. 30
Is that Friday 27 or Monday 30?
Gah. :) Monday 30.
--
David Glick
Web Developer
davidgl...@groundwire.org
On 8/29/10 2:26 PM, Geir Bækholt wrote:
Adding a new PLIP, i am not able to select 4.1 as a milestone. Only 4.0
exists in the vocabulary.
4.1 shows for me.
--
David Glick
Web Developer
davidgl...@groundwire.org
206.286.1235x32
Groundwire: You Are Connected
prevent inclusion of something that is less ambitious but still a useful
improvement, IMHO.
--
David Glick
Web Developer
davidgl...@groundwire.org
206.286.1235x32
Groundwire: You Are Connected
http://groundwire.org
of the reviews,
addressing to the framework-team list.
David
--
David Glick
Web Developer
davidgl...@groundwire.org
206.286.1235x32
Groundwire: You Are Connected
http://groundwire.org
___
Framework-Team mailing
--
David Glick
Web Developer
davidgl...@groundwire.org
206.286.1235x32
Groundwire: You Are Connected
http://groundwire.org
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo
My implementation for PLIP 9938 is done and ready for review. Start
with the notes at
https://svn.plone.org/svn/plone/buildouts/plone-coredev/branches/4.1/plips/plip9938-output-filters.txt
peace,
David
--
David Glick
Web Developer
davidgl...@groundwire.org
206.286.1235x32
it'll have to find all the portlet assignments to update them. If the 2 portlet
assignment classes have the same attributes maybe we can use a module alias,
but I haven't evaluated that.)
David Glick
Web Developer
davidgl...@groundwire.org
206.286.1235x32
[http://gw-logo.s3.amazonaws.com/gw
May 8 Framework team meeting
Present: Eric Steele, Alec Mitchell, David Glick, Liz Leddy; Absent:
Craig Haynal, Ross Patterson, Martijn Pieters, Laurence Rowe, Rob Gietema.
- There has a been a pattern of the European team members missing
meetings as of late. Do we need to reschedule the call
IMHO, probably https://plone.org/documentation/manual/developer-manual
(I know overall this manual needs a lot of work, but all the more reason to
try to add things to it in a well-structured way when we're documenting
PLIPs. There is also the collective docs, of course, but that seems like
it's
Nejc wasn't able to post to the framework-team list, so I'm forwarding
this for him.
*From:* Nejc Zupan nejc.zu...@gmail.com mailto:nejc.zu...@gmail.com
*Date:* October 2, 2012 11:56:03 PM PDT
*To:* David Glick (GW) davidgl...@groundwire.org
mailto:davidgl...@groundwire.org
*Subject:* *I'd
Here's a reminder of your action items; please try to make progress on
these:
- Eric is working on 4.2.3 and 4.3b1 releases.
- If you're championing a PLIP, make sure you know its status.
- Craig, Marcio, and Franco are reviewing PLIP 13091
(plone.app.multilingual)
- Craig and I are reviewing
Hi Marcio,
It's certainly understandable that planning the conference would take
considerable time and energy! I have appreciated your contributions to
the team and hope you'll consider participating again sometime in the
future.
See you in Brazil,
David
On 1/20/13 7:32 AM, Marcio Mazza
Hi team,
If you have a chance before our meeting today, please go to the PLIP
worksheet and do the following:
- make sure you've recorded a vote for the PLIPs in Submitted
- make sure you know the status of PLIPs you're the champion for under
In Process
- sign up to do reviews of the PLIPs
Hi team, friendly reminder to get your PLIP reviews done:
13419: Ross, Guido Stevens
12344: Johannes, Franco
13270: Craig, Andrzej
12253: David, Ross
10359: Andrzej, Ross
thanks,
David
___
Framework-Team mailing list
framework-t...@lists.plone.org
+1
On 7/19/13 3:30 PM, Steve McMahon wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Rok Garbas r...@garbas.si
mailto:r...@garbas.si wrote:
Forwarded message from Rok Garbas (2013-06-27 15:22:19):
hi,
i've been thinking on helping fwt in the past but never really
had
Hi team,
There is a topic I forgot to bring up in our meeting earlier today.
Maarten Kling from Four Digits contacted me to say that Four Digits is
organizing a sprint in Arnhem for mid-November, and wondered if the
Framework Team would be willing to recommend it to the board as a
strategic
Please remember to look over the PLIPs in the Submitted section of the
PLIP status spreadsheet, leave any comments you have in trac, and vote
on whether to accept the proposal for implementation.
thanks,
David
___
Framework-Team mailing list
On 9/3/13 3:01 AM, Johannes Raggam wrote:
Hi FWT,
I'm thinking about implications of the integration of plone.app.event in
Plone core and need to have some feedback:
1) Products.CMFPlone.CalendarTool was only used by the calendar portlet
and is now obsolete. Should we better remove or
Is there anyone who could review the work Myroslav Opyr has been doing
on the implementation of PLIP 13350? (see
https://dev.plone.org/ticket/13706) I have been meaning to do it but I
don't think I'll find time before the Plone conference.
I'm going to have a look at Nathan's CSRF PLIP this
Currently we have way too many date and datetime widgets in core:
- Archetypes
- z3c.form
- collective.z3cform.datetimewidget (added as an override of the default
z3c.form one by plone.app.z3cform; uses jquerytools date picker)
- plone.formwidget.datetime (added by plone.app.event; uses
On 9/17/13 4:16 PM, Johannes Raggam wrote:
plone.app.widgets.
i'll check this out at the buschenschanksprint this week. also
plone.formwidget.recurrence should become a plone.app.widgets pattern.
Great!
then we have to deprecate plone.formwidget.* for plone.app.event.
i'm unsure about how
On 10/3/13 7:38 PM, Rok Garbas wrote:
Quoting Johannes Raggam (2013-10-01 16:44:58)
Hey FWT!
I need some advice on how to handle a problem with plone.app.event:
In plone.app.event there is a ploneintegration submodule, profile and
setuptools extra. This is primarily needed because
On 10/8/13 1:38 PM, Ramon Navarro Bosch wrote:
I've been sprinting today on the middleware rendering subject and this
are my points to be discussed :
* Without direct access (with diazo) to Plone we will not be able to
access @@manage-viewlets so we will need some control panel that
decides
Hi framework team,
Can you all please vote on whether PLIP 13679 (automatic CSRF
protection) is ready to merge?
Also please make sure you have recorded your vote on PLIP 13091
(multilingual). I just updated the ticket to reflect the current plan
based on my discussion with Ramon in Brazil.
On 10/24/13, 9:39 AM, Rok Garbas wrote:
hey all,
during my last days in brasil i've pushed initial work on getting plip 13476
into coredev. since plip 13476 is quite big it would make sense to split it up,
like we already did with other plips.
1. as first i would like to merge into core all
On 10/24/13, 10:18 AM, Rok Garbas wrote:
with plone.app.event we also added new dependency
collective.elephantvocabulary. i'm the author of this package and what this
package does is extends a bit zope.schema's vocabulary. also if there is
plone.app.registry present it also makes use of that.
On 11/4/13, 10:36 PM, Timo Stollenwerk wrote:
I also started to write a PLIP for the removal of selected portal tools:
https://dev.plone.org/ticket/13770
Since I won't be able to attend the full sprint (only two days) it might
make sense if somebody else would champion that PLIP (at least for
On 11/5/13, 9:40 AM, Rok Garbas wrote:
Quoting David Glick (Plone) (2013-11-05 18:15:21)
On 11/4/13, 10:36 PM, Timo Stollenwerk wrote:
I also started to write a PLIP for the removal of selected portal tools:
https://dev.plone.org/ticket/13770
Since I won't be able to attend the full sprint
I put together an overview of the various efforts that are underway for
Plone 5, along with a few thoughts on what the highest priorities are
right now: http://titanpad.com/Sfinb2geKV
On 11/4/13, 7:42 AM, Rob Gietema wrote:
Just one more week and the Arnhem Sprint will start!
We currently
On 11/8/13, 2:51 AM, Johannes Raggam wrote:
On Fre, 2013-11-08 at 05:36 +0100, Rok Garbas wrote:
Quoting David Glick (Plone) (2013-11-08 03:45:05)
On 11/5/13, 1:07 PM, Johannes Raggam wrote:
Any thoughts or suggestions?
It seems like when importing you could just strip off the domain
Um. Looks like a bunch of tests aren't even running:
http://jenkins.plone.org/job/plone-5.0-python-2.7/1931/console
On 3/11/14, 7:46 PM, Nathan Van Gheem wrote:
Hi all,
The auto-csrf plip should now be merged.
The test failures should clear up.
Let me know if there are any problems.
+1!
On 11/3/14, 10:27 AM, Eric Bréhault wrote:
Hello,
At the Plone conference, Giacomo kindly asked me if I would like to be
part of the Framework team.
I think it could be nice, so if you think my help could be valuable to
you, I would be happy to join you.
Eric
On 2/16/15 10:02 AM, Timo Stollenwerk wrote:
Hi,
two months ago the FWT discussed creating a buildout.coredev branch
that contains all commits to all packages in the Plone repo:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UVNLqQFrq8AJkmNxEO9J4flIqGTf_TbAqR3TWwFguRY/edit
We need this in order to
On 1/25/15 9:24 PM, Nathan Van Gheem wrote:
Hi All,
I'd like to merge plone.app.widgets into all of other plone packages
for plone 5.
In doing so, I need to create some plone 4 only branches for
plone.app.dexterity and plone.app.contenttypes.
Any objections?
I don't really understand
On 5/29/15 4:55 AM, Eric Bréhault wrote:
Hello people,
I am trying to finish the TTW member schema editing PLIP
(https://dev.plone.org/ticket/13350) for Plone 5.
I think it is a very useful feature, but there are still some issues
to fix (see
Open source work has a way of taking more of us than we originally
intended to give, and it's so important to recognize when that happens
and correct it.
Jesse Noller had a good blog post on this topic recently:
http://jessenoller.com/blog/2015/10/31/community-boundaries
And I also think of
Thank you so much for your service to Plone on the framework team,
Johannes. Enjoy the chance to put time and energy into other things, but
you are welcome back any time!
David
On 12/12/17 3:40 PM, Johannes Raggam wrote:
Hi guys,
since some time it's getting harder for me to attend the
83 matches
Mail list logo
