On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
I seem to see somewhat of a performance drop in the past week.
You should have read the commit messages :-)
I enabled malloc flags AJ by default, this has a performance
cost. It will be turned off for releases of course.
It has already
At 12 Jul 2000 08:56:11 GMT,
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The bug is only in the status report, check the acutal size of
fetch.out. I fixed this in a commit half an hour ago.
Thanks!
By the way, current implementation of fetch(1) ignores "301 redirect"
silently. Is it
On Sun, 9 Jul 2000, A G F Keahan wrote:
I have a strange problem with smbfs, where the mounted share times out
and becomes inaccessible after a period of time. I haven't been able to
pinpoint the exact moment when it happens, but basically:
This was a bug in the processing of
Jun Kuriyama [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
By the way, current implementation of fetch(1) ignores "301 redirect"
silently. Is it expected behavior? Should it make warning message
without -v option? (or following redirection?)
Uh, that's a bug. It's supposed to work. I'll be right on it.
DES
--
Jun Kuriyama [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
By the way, current implementation of fetch(1) ignores "301 redirect"
silently. Is it expected behavior? Should it make warning message
without -v option? (or following redirection?)
The bug is twofold: first, it doesn't handle relative redirects
Just for the record:
i added a printf statement to the beginning of every subroutine in
file /sys/dev/kbd/kbd.c and with this additions the panic disappears
and pcvt runs fine as ever.
Removing the printf's from kbd.c shows the usual described panic.
I'm now completely out of ideas
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000 10:54:47 MST, Eric Anholt wrote:
What I did do, I went into sys/dev/fb/vga.c and commented out the
second vga head detection. Works beautifully now, though it would be
better to actually figure out why it was finding another vga card.
Still, it's up and running.
I'd
On 13-Jul-00 Hellmuth Michaelis wrote:
I'm now completely out of ideas
Try and pin down which printf really makes a difference ?
I recall a long time ago a bit of code that had calls to a function
that did nothing, the comment was that it prevented an MSC optimiser bug
Ok guys it's a _very_ rough HOWTO, but patches (not comments!) would be
appreciated:
How to install FreeBSD via Intel's netboot (PXE)
http://people.freebsd.org/~alfred/pxe/
enjoy.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a
On Monday, 10th July 2000, Stefan Esser wrote:
On 2000-07-09 20:52 +1000, Stephen McKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday, 8th July 2000, Stefan Esser wrote:
Oh, there are renegotiations after each overrun ???
The code at the point that an underrun is detected is:
printf("dc%d: TX
Hello All,
i was working on integration of Ethernet TAP driver and NETGRAPH
and found strange thing. the problem is that NG_ETHER nodes do not
detach correctly when interface is gone. i was taking a very quick
look at it, and, it seems to me that we are missing one reference
to a node. i think
I updated current around 6pm EDT yesterday (7/12/00) now I'm getting
mfs_badop[vop_getwritemount]
mfs_badop[vop_getwritemount] = 45
every now and again. I've received 10 being up 11 hours.
uname -a says
FreeBSD midgard.dhs.org 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Jul 12 23:59:08 GMT
2000
I turned off the malloc AJ flags, via malloc.conf. It improved 'make
world' by something like 17% == mean_aj/mean_AJ.
Make World Statistics
-current SMP, 2xP133, 96MB RAM, IBM Superstor 9G disk.
Lines is the number of lines of output produced by 'make world'.
Date Lines Make Time
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Thomas D. Dean" writes:
I turned off the malloc AJ flags, via malloc.conf. It improved 'make
world' by something like 17% == mean_aj/mean_AJ.
Make sense, make world is dominated by gcc/cc1 which is doing a
lot of malloc/free operations.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Stephen McKay wrote:
Guess it will show up if you measure latencies (or your application is
doing lots of RPCs). But as soon as there is a cheap 100baseT switch in
the path to the destination, there will be store-and-forward at work ;-)
Does anyone here actually measure
I object to these patches.
the idea is good but these patches are misguided..
Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO wrote:
Hello All,
i was working on integration of Ethernet TAP driver and NETGRAPH
and found strange thing. the problem is that NG_ETHER nodes do not
detach correctly when interface
I object to these patches.
the idea is good but these patches are misguided..
ok :) i did not say that is an ultimate solution :) i did
not even say that they are good :) the only idea behind
these patches is to show that there is a _possible_ node
reference problem :) that's it :)
[...]
I just upgraded my current system (source about 4 hours ago) and tried to
snapshot a file system...
(kgdb) core-file /var/crash/vmcore.6
IdlePTD 3649536
initial pcb at 2e3d60
panicstr: ffs_balloc: blk too big
panic messages:
---
---
#0 boot (howto=Cannot access memory at address 0xcced1ad4.
)
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000 11:08:50 GMT, Charles Anderson wrote:
I updated current around 6pm EDT yesterday (7/12/00) now I'm getting
mfs_badop[vop_getwritemount]
mfs_badop[vop_getwritemount] = 45
I've mailed Kirk about these, but if you read his snapshots commit
message, they're probably
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Stephen McKay wrote:
Guess it will show up if you measure latencies (or your application is
doing lots of RPCs). But as soon as there is a cheap 100baseT switch in
the path to the destination, there will be store-and-forward at work ;-)
Does anyone here actually
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Polstra writes:
: This is probably a candidate for UPDATING.
:
: That wouldn't hurt. But it actually affects _all_ branches, I
: believe. So in a way, UPDATING doesn't cover enough ground.
Does anybody have any text that is better than the following?
"Warner" == Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Warner In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Polstra writes:
Warner : This is probably a candidate for UPDATING.
Warner :
Warner : That wouldn't hurt. But it actually affects _all_ branches, I
Warner : believe. So in a way,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Martin Hopkins
writes:
: "Warner" == Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
:
: Warner In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Polstra
:writes:
: Warner : This is probably a candidate for UPDATING.
: Warner :
: Warner : That wouldn't hurt. But it
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Polstra writes:
: This is probably a candidate for UPDATING.
:
: That wouldn't hurt. But it actually affects _all_ branches, I
: believe. So in a way, UPDATING doesn't cover enough ground.
Does anybody have any text that is better than the following?
Warner In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Martin
Hopkins writes:
Warner : "Warner" == Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Warner :
Warner : Warner In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] John
Polstra writes:
Warner : Warner : This is probably a candidate for UPDATING.
"Mark" == Mark Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Polstra writes:
: This is probably a candidate for UPDATING.
:
: That wouldn't hurt. But it actually affects _all_ branches, I
: believe. So in a way, UPDATING doesn't cover enough
Hello All,
long time back there was a discussion about kerneld for FreeBSD.
some people have found it useless, but some not :)
anyway, alpha version of code can be found at sourceforge.net.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/kerneld/
changes:
- minor bug fixes
- kd device improvements (now
"Mark" == Mark Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Polstra writes:
: This is probably a candidate for UPDATING.
:
: That wouldn't hurt. But it actually affects _all_ branches, I
: believe. So in a way, UPDATING doesn't cover
Indeed, this was the problem. I, at some time, switched it to -O2.
Thanks for all the suggestions!
Patrick
Dan Papasian wrote:
What optimizations did you use when compiling your kernel?
(COPTFLAGS)
If it's anything more than -O -pipe, then that may very well
be your problem.
-Dan
Hmmm.. I have been experiencing a problem when I
installworld with freebsd-5.0. The install breaks with rtld-elf when the
install put the new copy of ld-elf.s0.1 onto my system. Most f my prgrams
signal 11 until I put the old ne back. Is there smething I was supposed t
do befre this??
Cyrille Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
why it's not possible to suspend SCSI drives like the ATA/IDE ones ?
I'm not talking about camcontrol suspend feature. if you have a mounted
filesystem, and access a file onto that filesystem while the drive is
suspended in this manner, the system
On Thursday, 13th July 2000, "Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Stephen McKay wrote:
Does anyone here actually measure these latencies? I know for a fact
that nothing I've ever done would or could be affected by extra latencies
that are as small as the ones we are discussing.
On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Stephen McKay wrote:
place. I suspect an interaction between the ATA driver and VIA chipsets,
because other than the network, that's all that is operating when I see
the underruns. And my Celeron with a ZX chipset is immune.
I've noticed this on a VIA chipset machine.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Hellmuth Michaelis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i added a printf statement to the beginning of every subroutine in
file /sys/dev/kbd/kbd.c and with this additions the panic disappears
and pcvt runs fine as ever.
Removing the printf's from kbd.c shows the usual
34 matches
Mail list logo
