Re: WITHOUT_GNU_[COMPAT|SUPPORT]

2012-10-11 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 11-10-2012 19:09, Ian Lepore escreveu: I want to build grep without the gnu regex library. The makefile for usr.bin/grep contains .if !defined(WITHOUT_GNU_COMPAT) And man src.conf documents WITHOUT_GNU_SUPPORT but doesn't mention WITHOUT_GNU_COMPAT. Is this a typo in the makefile,

[HEADSUP] Upcoming GNU sort removal

2012-10-04 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Hi, it has been more than 3 months ago that BSD sort became default in HEAD and no serious complaints have been raised against it since then so I plan to permanently remove GNU sort from head in the next days. If you have any objection, please raise it now. Gabor

Re: [HEADSUP] Upcoming GNU sort removal

2012-10-04 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 04-10-2012 16:50, Dennis Glatting escreveu: On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 12:53 +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: Hi, it has been more than 3 months ago that BSD sort became default in HEAD and no serious complaints have been raised against it since then so I plan to permanently remove GNU sort

[HEADS-UP] BSD sort is the default sort in -CURRENT

2012-06-27 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Folks, as I announced before, the default sort in -CURRENT has been changed to BSD sort. Since the import, the reported minor bugs have been fixed and BSD sort has passed the portbuild test. If you encounter any problems or incompatibility with

Re: [HEADS-UP] BSD sort is the default sort in -CURRENT

2012-06-27 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
On 2012.06.27. 10:34, Doug Barton wrote: Great, can you post the results somewhere? I understand what you're saying below that there are situations where worse performance may need explanation, but it would be helpful if we had the data to look at. If something is buggy than it is not comparable

Re: [HEADS-UP] BSD sort is the default sort in -CURRENT

2012-06-27 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
On 2012.06.27. 8:11, O. Hartmann wrote: ... so, can I delete the entry WITH_BSD_SORT=yes in /etc/src.conf then? Yes. BSD sort will still be the default. And if you want default GNU sort, you can add WITH_GNU_SORT=yes. Gabor ___

Re: CURRENT: buildworld fails

2012-05-29 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
On 2012.05.29. 5:44, 山谷崇史 wrote: I had same problem, but I resolved it. Maybe, your sort (/usr/bin/sort) is broken. cd /usr/src make update cd usr.bin/sort make obj depend all install Then, sort is changed. make cleandir cleandir make buildworld Could you please elaborate it a bit? From

Re: [HEADS-UP] BSD sort coming to -CURRENT

2012-05-11 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
On 2012.05.08. 17:51, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: Hi Folks, Oleg Moskalenko has been working very hard on BSD sort and by now we think it is compatible with the base version (and has even more features, the ideas mostly taken from the latest GNU sort) and it is efficient. I just updated

Re: [HEADS-UP] BSD sort coming to -CURRENT

2012-05-09 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
On 2012.05.09. 1:21, Oleg Moskalenko wrote: Michael, The situation is actually more complex than I described in my email, but the good news is that we already have a fix that supports all older syntax forms. I tested it with ispell ports and it builds just fine. We will update the bsdsort

Re: [HEADS-UP] BSD sort coming to -CURRENT

2012-05-09 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
On 2012.05.09. 13:01, Hartmann, O. wrote: On 05/09/12 12:44, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: On 2012.05.09. 1:21, Oleg Moskalenko wrote: Michael, The situation is actually more complex than I described in my email, but the good news is that we already have a fix that supports all older syntax forms. I

[HEADS-UP] BSD sort coming to -CURRENT

2012-05-08 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Hi Folks, Oleg Moskalenko has been working very hard on BSD sort and by now we think it is compatible with the base version (and has even more features, the ideas mostly taken from the latest GNU sort) and it is efficient. I just updated the textproc/bsdsort port to the latest version so

Re: fast bcopy...

2012-05-03 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 03-05-2012 12:28, Steven Atreju escreveu: Yes, of course. Though i was kinda, even shocked, once i've seen this first: http://marc.info/?l=dragonfly-commitsm=132241713812022w=2 I also experimented a bit with some trivial libc functions when testing a change for memcpy (still in queue,

Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available

2012-03-18 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
On 2012.03.14. 19:01, Mark Felder wrote: Would it be appropriate to perhaps have a port option to OVERWRITE_BASE and then people could just install that port, build world and kernel... build a ton of ports. See if anything that might possibly use it breaks? Yes, I'm working on the update and

Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available

2012-03-18 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
On 2012.03.14. 22:10, Adrian Chadd wrote: So you could intall gnusort, bsdsort, and then some config file would determine which was used. 'sort' would then be a symlink to said magic program, that'd look at its argv[0], look at the contents of that file, and exec() the right one. I prefer

CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available

2012-03-14 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Hi Folks, some time ago I started writing a BSDL sort variant from scratch since the OpenBSD version did not support multibyte locales and was hard to modify. The development was a bit stalled but recently, Oleg Moskalenko oleg.moskale...@citrix.com showed interest in continuing this version

Re: WITH_ICONV/WITH_BSD_GREP: Defaults?

2012-01-05 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
On 2012.01.05. 21:04, O. Hartmann wrote: In FreeBSD 9 and 10, src.conf could be populated with those two knobs WITH_ICONV and WITH_BSD_GREP For some testing purposes, I switched them both to enabled, so I could test ports and software against these. I didn't realize any serious issue with

Re: bsdgrep-20110912: -F/fgrep enbug

2011-09-19 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
On 2011.09.19. 3:40, poyop...@puripuri.plala.or.jp wrote: Hi, I found another issue, this time in bsdgrep-20110912 in port. Thanks for using BSD grep and reporting bugs! I've checked and confirmed these issues. In my development branch I have already committed a partial fix. It will be

Re: [bsdgrep] --exclude-dir doesn't work

2011-08-11 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2011.08.09. 14:43, Test Rat escreveu: It seems fnmatch(3) args were accidentally swapped. Try $ bsdgrep -Fr --exclude-dir '*.svn*' grep_ usr.bin/grep | bsdgrep -c svn 72 Thanks! I'll commit this, too. Gabor ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org

Re: issues with bsdgrep and lang/go

2011-08-11 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
. Gabor Kovesdan ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: issues with bsdgrep and lang/go

2011-08-11 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2011.08.10. 22:09, Alexander Best escreveu: well i'd like to help the author of bsdgrep to improve it. testing it and then going back to gnu grep, because bsdgrep still has bugs isn't going to help much. by using it i'd like to trip over these kind of bugs and report them. but you're

Re: issues with bsdgrep and lang/go

2011-08-11 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
. Gabor Kovesdan ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

[CFT] patch to replace the regex code

2011-06-25 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
. The patch is here: http://kovesdan.org/patches/tre-20110724.diff Regards, Gabor Kovesdan ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr

Re: [CFT] patch to replace the regex code

2011-06-25 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Forgive me if I'm patronizing, but is there any surprise that a POSIX NFA implementation is slower than grep's DFA? Oh, of course an NFA implementation will always be slightly slower but the memory footprint will also be smaller, which is a big advantage for embedded systems. But in this

Re: HEADSUP: BSD iconv coming to the base system with default off

2011-03-17 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Hi Alexander, for whatever historic reason I had WITH_ICONV in /etc/make.conf on my desktop, so I got to be your guinea pig without conscious consent for that role on my part. I did hit several issues so far: thanks for your valuable comments about iconv and I'm sorry that you had to try it out

HEADSUP: BSD iconv coming to the base system with default off

2011-02-24 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
by setting the WITH_ICONV knob but whoever does it will take into account that it may break some ports from being built. However, this change will help me with future work and will also help interested people in getting involved in the testing. The rather big changeset is coming soon. Regards, Gabor

Re: BSD grep performance

2010-08-23 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2010.08.19. 8:41, Doug Barton escreveu: The performance is now almost comparable to GNU grep. I think you're using a very liberal definition of comparable. Ok, comparable for the casual cases but not generally comparable. I think with this, BSD grep may remain default if no other

Re: Official request: Please make GNU grep the default

2010-08-23 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2010.08.19. 23:42, b. f. escreveu: Gabor: One more thing to look into, in addition to the context problems, ndisgen breakage, and problems on certain file systems: At r211506, 'grep -wq' does not seem to work properly (in the very least, it is not the same as with GNU grep), and has broken

Re: why GNU grep is fast

2010-08-23 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2010.08.21. 4:31, Mike Haertel escreveu: Hi Gabor, I am the original author of GNU grep. I am also a FreeBSD user, although I live on -stable (and older) and rarely pay attention to -current. However, while searching the -current mailing list for an unrelated reason, I stumbled across

Re: why GNU grep is fast

2010-08-23 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Later on, he summarizes some of the existing implementations, including comments about the Plan 9 implementation and his own RE2, both of which efficiently handle international text (which seems to be a major concern of Gabor's). I believe Gabor is considering TRE for a good replacement

What to learn from the BSD grep case [Was: why GNU grep is fast]

2010-08-23 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Hi all, there are some consequences that we can see from the grep case. Here I'd like to add a summary, which raises some questions. All comments are welcome. 1, When grep entered -CURRENT and bugs were found I immediately got kind bug reports and sharp criticism, as well. According to my

Re: bsdgrep does not work with tail -f | grep combination

2010-08-18 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2010.08.18. 7:42, poyop...@puripuri.plala.or.jp escreveu: Hi Gabor and others, As Gabor committed r211364, bsdgrep now works nicely with tail -f. http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/211364 Thank you very much. Acknowledgements also go to you and other users. Without quality feedback I

Re: Official request: Please make GNU grep the default

2010-08-18 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2010.08.13. 10:43, Doug Barton escreveu: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Gabor, I hope at this point it goes without saying that I have a lot of respect for the work you've done on BSD grep, and I've already told you that I think you're very courageous for taking the

Re: Removal of ICC (intel compiler) bits from mk

2010-08-18 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2010.08.18. 19:37, Rui Paulo escreveu: On 18 Aug 2010, at 18:18, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Rui Paulorpa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I've been chatting with the ICC ex-users and they seem to be ok with the removal of the ICC bits from share/mk and other places.

Re: Official request: Please make GNU grep the default

2010-08-16 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2010.08.15. 21:49, Dimitry Andric escreveu: GNU grep Elapsed time: 57 seconds BSD grep (original) Elapsed time: 820 seconds (~14.4x slower than GNU grep) BSD grep (quickfixed) Elapsed time: 115 seconds (~2.0x slower than GNU grep) It proves that getting rid of the

Re: Official request: Please make GNU grep the default

2010-08-16 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2010.08.16. 16:11, Dag-Erling Smørgrav escreveu: Sean C. Farleys...@freebsd.org writes: Dag-Erling Smørgravd...@des.no writes: Did you actually test your patch? It makes absolutely no measurable difference. Yes, I saw a reduction, I didn't... I also saw a

Re: Official request: Please make GNU grep the default

2010-08-15 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2010.08.15. 21:07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav escreveu: Ignore the first two lines (that's the profiling code itself). Note that the top five lines are all in stdio, and nothing else even shows up on the radar. I only included enough output to show where the regexp code ranks; the complete output

Re: Official request: Please make GNU grep the default

2010-08-14 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2010.08.13. 10:52, Roman Divacky escreveu: what about optimizing BSD grep instead? [... picking one mail from the many that suggest this ...] The problem is that optimization is not that trivial. I think the bottleneck is the regex library because: 1, BSD grep is so simple. There may

Re: Official request: Please make GNU grep the default

2010-08-14 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2010.08.14. 17:53, Andrey Chernov escreveu: On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 01:43:16AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: Gabor, I hope at this point it goes without saying that I have a lot of respect I am Nth on this. Although I do a lot of l10n work in the beautefull less bureocracy FreeBSD

Re: Official request: Please make GNU grep the default

2010-08-13 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2010.08.13. 10:43, Doug Barton escreveu: My reason is simple, performance. While doing some portmaster work recently I was regression testing some changes I made to the --index* options and noticed that things were dramatically slower than the last time I tested those features. Thinking that

Re: Official request: Please make GNU grep the default

2010-08-13 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2010.08.13. 13:09, Matthias Andree escreveu: Gabor Kovesdan wrote on 2010-08-13: Em 2010.08.13. 10:43, Doug Barton escreveu: My reason is simple, performance. While doing some portmaster work recently I was regression testing some changes I made to the --index* options and noticed

Re: Official request: Please make GNU grep the default

2010-08-13 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2010.08.13. 13:33, Anonymous escreveu: Doug Bartondo...@freebsd.org writes: [...] My reason is simple, performance. While doing some portmaster work recently I was regression testing some changes I made to the --index* options and noticed that things were dramatically slower than the

Re: [bsdgrep] -w option matches part of words (Was: Apache 2.2 port and missing modules on current.)

2010-08-10 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2010.08.10. 19:45, Anonymous escreveu: Seems like APACHE_MODULES is incorrectly populated. $ make -V APACHE_MODULES BATCH= GREP=${LOCALBASE-/usr/local}/bin/grep | fgrep cache ...cache disk_cache file_cache... $ make -V APACHE_MODULES BATCH= | fgrep cache ...disk_cache

Re: read() on dirs - grep

2010-08-09 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2010.08.09. 21:34, Gennady Proskurin escreveu: I see misbehaviour of new bsd grep in freebsd on tmpfs when grepping dirs. For example (on tmpfs /tmp): mkdir /tmp/qwe grep something /tmp/qwe (grep hangs) Thank you for the report, I'm already aware of the issue and preparing a fix for it.

Re: bsdgrep does not work with tail -f | grep combination

2010-08-04 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2010.08.04. 20:06, Xin LI escreveu: I'm able to reproduce the GNU behavior on 9.0-CURRENT which is IMO right. I think we need to break at the line end to provide better interactivity (the current code seems to do it (buffer is not full !eof), while what we wanted is (buffer is not full

Re: bsdgrep does not work with tail -f | grep combination

2010-08-03 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2010.08.03. 19:25, poyop...@puripuri.plala.or.jp escreveu: Hi, It seems bsdgrep does not work when piped from tail -f. I'm running r210728. term0$ jot 10 /tmp/1 term0$ tail -f /tmp/1 | grep 0 [no output] otherterm$ jot 10 /tmp/1 [no output to term0] = with GNU grep: term0$ tail -f

Re: BSD grep fixes

2010-07-28 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2010.07.27. 5:59, b. f. escreveu: Other important differences between bsdgrep and GNU grep: The --include option in bsdgrep does not have the same effect as the corresponding option in GNU grep -- in GNU grep, that option causes _only_ those files matching the file inclusion pattern to be

Re: BSD grep fixes

2010-07-28 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2010.07.28. 17:26, b. f. escreveu: I don't think that the current behavior of bsdgrep is necessarily bad -- in fact it seems to me to be simple and intuitive: nothing is excluded or included implicitly, and (I think) the last match wins, unlike in gnu grep. I mention it only because it is

Re: BSD grep fixes

2010-07-28 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2010.07.28. 17:48, Dag-Erling Smørgrav escreveu: Gabor Kovesdanga...@freebsd.org writes: b. f.bf1...@gmail.com writes: I don't think that the current behavior of bsdgrep is necessarily bad -- in fact it seems to me to be simple and intuitive: nothing is excluded or included

Re: BSD grep fixes

2010-07-25 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
`-l' option is not supposed to show the matching line at all, only filename. Thanks. Fix is ready and waiting for my mentor's approval. http://kovesdan.org/patches/grep-lL.diff Gabor ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: [bsdgrep] outputs color sequences even when stdout is not tty

2010-07-24 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
I think it should behave like ls(1) and gnu grep(1) and strip color sequences if stdout is not associated with terminal. Thanks for letting me know about this. The fix is being worked on just like for the -q/-l bug. Gabor ___

Re: [bsdgrep] grep -ql does not supress output

2010-07-23 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2010.07.24. 6:19, Doug Barton escreveu: There are several places in portmaster where I use '[e]grep -ql foo' to signal existence of something without having to deal with the output of grep. In oldgrep this worked as advertised. In bsdgrep it doesn't. Furthermore, looking at the code it

periodic script in base system to run csup

2010-07-16 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Hi folks, Steven Kreuzer wrote a periodic script to run csup updates with periodic daily. I've reviewed it and added support for multiple supfiles. I'd like to commit this to head. http://kovesdan.org/files/600.csup Is there any objection? Gabor

Re: periodic script in base system to run csup

2010-07-16 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2010.07.16. 16:15, Jilles Tjoelker escreveu: Hmm, /usr/src/Makefile has an 'update' target that can run csup and other updating tools. Perhaps it should call that instead? It is not just for updating your src tree but your ports tree, doc tree or eventually your local CVS repo. That's

Re: periodic script in base system to run csup

2010-07-16 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2010.07.16. 16:23, Alex Kozlov escreveu: On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 03:58:33PM +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: Thousands pc simultaneously try to access cvsup servers? Sound like a ddos to me. Yes, this was the only concern and that's why I started this discussion. Btw, if You have time

Re: [CFT] BSDL iconv in base system

2010-07-08 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2010.07.06. 17:54, Anonymous escreveu: BTW, I think there is regression in iconv(1). It wasn't there in iconv_base_integrate2.diff. (gdb) r Starting program: /usr/bin/iconv During symbol reading, DW_AT_name missing from DW_TAG_base_type. During symbol reading, cannot get low and

Re: [CFT] BSDL iconv in base system

2010-07-06 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2010.07.04. 17:58, Anonymous escreveu: Do you create /usr/lib32/i18n directory before installing into it? Oh, I'm sorry I just tested cross-building but not normal building on amd64. This patch seems to fix the issue, I've added the necessary directories to mtree:

Re: [CFT] BSDL iconv in base system

2010-07-03 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2010.06.17. 23:21, Anonymous escreveu: If cross-compiling doesn't work, how did you build the former one that gave you that error? Here is my guess libiconv_modules compiles fine but installs both normal and lib32 objdir into /usr/lib when lib32 should use /usr/lib32.

Re: [CFT] BSDL iconv in base system

2010-06-28 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2010.06.17. 23:21, Anonymous escreveu: Gabor Kovesdanga...@freebsd.org writes: [...] $ make installworld TARGET=i386 DESTDIR=/b/bbb ... === usr.bin/mkcsmapper (install) install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 mkcsmapper /b/bbb/usr/bin strip:

Re: [CFT] BSDL iconv in base system

2010-06-17 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
build the former one that gave you that error? -- Gabor Kovesdan FreeBSD Volunteer EMAIL: ga...@freebsd.org .:|:. ga...@kovesdan.org WEB: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor .:|:. http://kovesdan.org ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http

Re: [CFT] BSDL iconv in base system

2010-06-17 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
. -- Gabor Kovesdan FreeBSD Volunteer EMAIL: ga...@freebsd.org .:|:. ga...@kovesdan.org WEB: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor .:|:. http://kovesdan.org ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current

Re: [CFT] BSDL iconv in base system

2010-06-17 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
for your comments. -- Gabor Kovesdan FreeBSD Volunteer EMAIL: ga...@freebsd.org .:|:. ga...@kovesdan.org WEB: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor .:|:. http://kovesdan.org ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman

Re: [CFT] BSDL iconv in base system

2010-06-16 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
this. -- Gabor Kovesdan FreeBSD Volunteer EMAIL: ga...@freebsd.org .:|:. ga...@kovesdan.org WEB: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor .:|:. http://kovesdan.org ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current

Re: [CFT] BSDL iconv in base system

2010-06-15 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
compatibility. This will be important for ports. This is also the reason why BSD grep is linked to GNU regex instead of libc-regex. -- Gabor Kovesdan FreeBSD Volunteer EMAIL: ga...@freebsd.org .:|:. ga...@kovesdan.org WEB: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor .:|:. http://kovesdan.org

Re: [CFT] BSDL iconv in base system

2010-06-15 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
this one. The new patch is here: http://www.kovesdan.org/patches/iconv_base_integrate2.diff And a gzipped version: http://www.kovesdan.org/patches/iconv_base_integrate2.diff.gz -- Gabor Kovesdan FreeBSD Volunteer EMAIL: ga...@freebsd.org .:|:. ga...@kovesdan.org WEB: http://people.FreeBSD.org

Re: [CFT] BSDL iconv in base system

2010-06-15 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
that with a clean unpatched src tree and I'm not using any CFLAGS tweak or such. If you haven't done make clean yet, you can resume the build with: make buildworld -DNO_CLEAN WERROR= CWARNFLAGS= -- Gabor Kovesdan FreeBSD Volunteer EMAIL: ga...@freebsd.org .:|:. ga...@kovesdan.org WEB: http

[CFT] BSDL iconv in base system

2010-06-14 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
/bsc_iconv.pdf The rather big patch (42,5M) is available here: http://www.kovesdan.org/patches/iconv_base_integrate.diff Any comments, suggestions or bugreports are very welcome. -- Gabor Kovesdan FreeBSD Volunteer EMAIL:ga...@freebsd.org .:|:.ga...@kovesdan.org WEB:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor

Re: compiling FreeBSD to test a netbook

2010-02-27 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
have an Atom-based netbook and it takes quite long but not that long. I usually compile kernel/world directly there. One battery charge (which make it last~4 hours) is enough for me to do a complete upgrade. -- Gabor Kovesdan FreeBSD Volunteer EMAIL: ga...@freebsd.org .:|:. ga...@kovesdan.org WEB