On 10/10/13 09:20, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2013-10-10 03:00, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 10/09/13 18:55, Teske, Devin wrote:
On Oct 8, 2013, at 11:19 PM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 10/09/13 01:13, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2013-10-08 16:17, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 10/07/13 21:59, Allan Jude wrote
On 10/09/13 01:13, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2013-10-08 16:17, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 10/07/13 21:59, Allan Jude wrote:
Devin Teske and I have been working on a big patch to bsdinstall to
implement installing on a ZFS pool. It supports both GPT and MBR, the 4k
sector gnop trick, and optional
On 10/07/13 21:59, Allan Jude wrote:
Devin Teske and I have been working on a big patch to bsdinstall to
implement installing on a ZFS pool. It supports both GPT and MBR, the 4k
sector gnop trick, and optional GELI encryption. We would like to commit
this in time for 10.0-BETA1 so it needs
On 10/08/13 22:25, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Nathan Whitehorn
nwhiteh...@freebsd.org mailto:nwhiteh...@freebsd.orgwrote:
4. What is this gnop stuff for?
Can't comment on the rest, but gnop is required to create 4K-aligned
vdevs where the minimum block size
On 10/08/13 22:50, Teske, Devin wrote:
On Oct 8, 2013, at 1:17 PM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 10/07/13 21:59, Allan Jude wrote:
Devin Teske and I have been working on a big patch to bsdinstall to
implement installing on a ZFS pool. It supports both GPT and MBR, the 4k
sector gnop trick
On 10/08/13 23:21, Kurt Lidl wrote:
On 10/8/2013, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 10/07/13 21:59, Allan Jude wrote:
Devin Teske and I have been working on a big patch to bsdinstall to
implement installing on a ZFS pool. It supports both GPT and MBR,
the 4k
sector gnop trick, and optional GELI
On 09/27/13 09:18, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
Boris Samorodov wrote on 27.09.2013 17:38:
reverting those two commits solved the issue.
In my case just rebuilding and restarting of sysutils/hal helped.
Rebuilding and restarting hald solved the issue on non-reverted
kernel. Thank you,
On 09/16/13 03:54, Larry Rosenman wrote:
I took the minimalist file from man unbound.conf, and the
unbound-checkconf
and unbound itself does NOT like it:
A related note: it seems like the /etc bits for unbound have not been
hooked up. There is no default config (this post) but also no RC
On 09/11/13 20:42, Uzumaki Naruto wrote:
If the issue is GPT and MBR, I am quite sure this laptop BIOS doesn't support
GPT disk type, because OEM Acer only gave GPT supported BIOS for model that
pre-loaded with Windows 8.
Maybe it helps to clarify, this laptop got no UEFI firmware, I could
On 09/04/13 02:01, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 04.09.2013 00:48, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Outback Dingo
outbackdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Can anyone confirm how well tested/stable this patch set might be?? if
theres positive input i have a zoo of dev machines i
On 09/04/13 08:20, Ryan Stone wrote:
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote:
Could you describe what this macro is supposed to do so that we can do the
porting work?
-Nathan
#define GET_STACK_USAGE(total, used)
GET_STACK_USAGE sets the variable passed
On 09/04/13 11:00, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, September 04, 2013 10:11:28 am Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 09/04/13 08:20, Ryan Stone wrote:
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Could you describe what this macro is supposed to do so that we can
On 08/30/13 00:35, David Chisnall wrote:
On 30 Aug 2013, at 08:18, Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org wrote:
As far as I'm concerned we can even slate it for
possible removal in 10.2-- if clang has proven up to the task
I would be happy to ship gcc, as long as:
- It's explicitly marked as
On 08/25/13 18:41, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Fri, 23 Aug 2013, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
I object. Many ports that compiles perfectly on gcc 4.2.1 can't be
compiled with lang/gcc. I checked this once and the number of ports
that require strictly gcc 4.2.1 was bigger for me then number of
On 08/23/13 07:26, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 23/08/2013 14:06 David Chisnall said the following:
Our gcc is from 2007. It has no C11, no C++11 support. It has bugs in its
atomic generation so you can't use it sensibly without lots of inline
assembly (which it doesn't support for newer
On 08/23/13 07:30, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 12:06 +0100, David Chisnall wrote:
On 23 Aug 2013, at 11:42, Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org wrote:
no, I believe we have said that 10 would ship with clang by default. NO mention
was made about gcc being absent, and I am
On 06/23/13 14:52, Dan Mack wrote:
dialog4ports has been crashing on all of my systems for about the last
week. I rebuilt it with debug symbols and this is what I got (doesn't
matter which port is using it).
Anyone else seeing this?
libdialog was updated recently. I had to rebuild
On 06/08/13 14:17, Glen Barber wrote:
On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 12:10:16PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote:
On Jun 8, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Glen Barber wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 05:22:56PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
Has anyone else tried the i386 memstick and having the same problem?
Hmm. Thanks
On 03/18/13 07:18, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dkwrote:
In message CAFHbX1KkD7fWP+KZNrSjzCStUM_Smjw7GdKDTo=
djjmoe5t...@mail.gmail.com, Tom Evans writes:
You say this, have you actually measured/checked. sysutils/dmidecode
On 02/22/13 06:08, Claude Buisson wrote:
On 02/22/2013 09:21, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
skipped
You need to provide the dmesg from r246713 and r246712 to compare.
The note that r246711 snapshot exhibited this same problem makes
me sceptical.
Here are the verbose dmesg from r246712 and
On 02/22/13 15:46, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
ATAPI devices on legacy ATA controllers were lost due to command timeout
caused by data underrun, caused by r246713.
r247165 should fix the issue.
Mine is on AHCI. Should that have been fixed too?
-Nathan
On 01/27/13 10:19, G B wrote:
Recently I purchased an HP p2-1334 with an Inetl Core i3 and 6GB or
RAM. My sole reason for purchasing it is to use virtualization which
needs VT-x and EPT which the i3 has. However, my installations of
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-amd64, FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-amd64,
On 01/06/13 09:59, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2013-01-06 15:17, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 04:49:41PM +0100, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
Here's a minimal test case that reproduces the bug:
[...]
Until someone fixes this bug, could we apply something like this as a
On 01/06/13 10:29, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 01/06/13 09:59, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2013-01-06 15:17, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 04:49:41PM +0100, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
Here's a minimal test case that reproduces the bug:
[...]
Until someone fixes this bug, could
On 01/06/13 11:46, David Chisnall wrote:
On 6 Jan 2013, at 14:17, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 04:49:41PM +0100, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
Here's a minimal test case that reproduces the bug:
[...]
Until someone fixes this bug, could we apply something like this as a
On 01/04/13 15:23, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 08:06:02PM +0100, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 08:14:38PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 04:49:41PM +0100, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
Here's a minimal test case that reproduces
On 01/02/13 07:04, Stefan Esser wrote:
I'd be interested in the general policy on LINKS vs. SYMLINKS
between directories that might end up on different file systems.
There seems to be an assumption that system directories in /usr
(e.g. /usr/bin, /usr/sbin, /usr/libexec) are on the same file
On 12/31/12 00:18, Juli Mallett wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
.. not that I mind old things being retired, but we really should
announce things like this.
Also - you disconnected libftpio too; is that intentional?
I would assume so, given that
On 12/27/12 09:07, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that most of my C++ applications in recent versions of FreeBSD
head suddenly crash without me recompiling them. I tracked it down to
r243830 which imported a new clang version. The new clang seems to
compile libgcc in a wrong or at
On 12/17/12 00:06, Andrew Thompson wrote:
On 17 December 2012 18:06, Jim Harris jimhar...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Andrew Thompson thom...@freebsd.orgwrote:
On 17 December 2012 13:17, Bryan Venteicher bry...@freebsd.org wrote:
There's been lots of requests to
On 11/20/12 07:52, CeDeROM wrote:
Hello :-)
I have some problems with WiFi connectivity on my Dell Latitude E4310
laptop with Intel card. Very often connection is broken, although
windows clients of the same network is working fine. I need to turn
radio off and on, sometimes this does not help,
On 11/04/12 08:29, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-11-04 14:18, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 02:42:13PM +0200, David Naylor wrote:
...
I tried building (using gcc) wine with your patch and now (at least)
winecfg
and regedit work with a clang built lib32. I'll email
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
TB --- 2012-10-27 23:08:18 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
@/dev/drm/drmP.h:122:36: error: machine/../linux/linux.h: No such file or
directory
@/dev/drm/drmP.h:123:42: error: machine/../linux/linux_proto.h: No such file or
On 10/19/12 09:25, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Firewire is
- a significant security risk
- an obstacle to functining suspend / resume on many systems
- rapidly becoming obsolete
- available as a module
The attached patch removes it from GENERIC across the board. Any
serious objections
On 09/11/12 09:56, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-09-11 16:27, Tijl Coosemans wrote: On 11-09-2012 16:10,
Dimitry Andric wrote:
...
Yes, maths support, specifically precision, is admittedly still one of
clang's (really llvm's) weaker points. It is currently not really a
high priority item for
On 05/24/12 10:58, Damjan Marion wrote:
On May 24, 2012, at 4:30 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
On May 24, 2012, at 3:40 AM, Damjan Marion wrote:
On May 24, 2012, at 10:25 AM, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
I was looking into this few months ago but I didn't found a value in doing
this in embedded world
On 04/07/12 07:50, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Hello,
there seems to be a problem with device attach sequence offered by newbus.
Basically, when device attach method is executing, device is not fully
initialized yet. Also the device state in the newbus part of the world
is DS_ALIVE. There is
On 04/07/12 10:15, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 10:04:59AM -0500, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 04/07/12 07:50, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Hello,
there seems to be a problem with device attach sequence offered by newbus.
Basically, when device attach method is executing
On 03/27/12 17:13, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
The upstream maintainer just e-mailed me a possible fix for the
problem and it looks very promising. Please try the attached patch.
Note the patch reverts r233555 and applies the fix. This patch is
also available from here:
On 03/19/12 14:35, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi all,
In order to identify architectures I need to find a uniq id for every
possibilities (for pkgng)
here is the identification I propose:
arch-class-os-majorversion(-archi_specific_extension)
arch can be one of the following:
- x86 for i386
On 02/19/12 04:28, Super Bisquit wrote:
I decided to try burning an image from Index of
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/powerpc/powerpc/ISO-IMAGES/9.0/
And here are the following errors:
1.) The usb image doesn't boot. From following Whitehorn and others on
the FreeBSD PowerPC
On Jan 30, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 18:59 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
o hw.ata.ata_dma, hw.ata.atapi_dma - I am not sure if there have
been any
significant problems with ATA DMA recently. Maybe these could be
removed?
I still have to work with hardware
On 01/04/12 14:56, Warner Losh wrote:
On Dec 29, 2011, at 1:49 PM, Bruce Cran wrote:
On 29/12/2011 18:39, Renato Botelho wrote:
IIRC, PCBSD installer can install a regular FreeBSD on ZFS.
It can do, but you're left with a /very/ basic installation - the hostname,
network interfaces etc.
On 12/29/11 14:04, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2011 2:55:10 pm Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 12/29/11 10:52, Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011, John Baldwin wrote:
A way to select from available partition types (UFS, boot, swap, ZFS,
etc.)
rather than requiring the user
On 12/29/11 04:34, Mark Blackman wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011, Peter J. Cherny wrote:
I believe removal of sysinstall exposes the community's blindness to a
major parts of it's future, ZFS root.
Other than following arcane recipes,
the only way to create a system with ZFS root is by using
On 12/29/11 06:52, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, December 27, 2011 9:32:52 pm Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 12/28/11 06:29, Doug Barton wrote:
On 12/27/2011 03:48, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On the topic of Doug's actual question, I see minimal sense in
resurrecting sysinstall in head now. I
On 12/29/11 10:52, Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011, John Baldwin wrote:
A way to select from available partition types (UFS, boot, swap, ZFS,
etc.)
rather than requiring the user to remember the 'freebsd-xxx' string
would be
one improvement.
There are PRs for that and several other
On 12/29/11 12:51, Bruce Cran wrote:
On 29/12/2011 16:37, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
I'd appreciate any specific comments you might have, and especially
specific suggestions for improvements. Except from people who are old
hands at sysinstall, I've received almost universally positive
comments
On 12/18/11 04:34, Adrian Chadd wrote:
The trouble is that there's lots of anecdotal evidence, but noone's
really gone digging deep into _their_ example of why it's broken. The
developers who know this stuff don't see anything wrong. That hints to
me it may be something a little more creepy - as
On 12/11/11 08:39, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
Hi Daniel;
--- On Sat, 12/3/11, Daniel Eischendeisc...@freebsd.org wrote:
...
I would love to mirror the SVN repo in the same way
and have an 'svn' in base, or at least something that
could replace CVS in the above scenario.
On 12/05/11 10:47, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message 201112051743.13483.mark.martinec+free...@ijs.si, Mark Martinec
wri
tes:
Using a guided partitioning install of 9.0-RC2 on a 64GB (virtual) disk
(from a 9.0-RC2 ISO image) results in the following GPT partitioning:
# gpart show
On 11/22/11 07:46, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, November 21, 2011 1:05:28 pm Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 11/21/11 11:52, John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday, November 19, 2011 7:07:58 pm Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 11/18/11 17:09, nev...@tx.net wrote:
If you are performating a manual partion
On 11/21/11 11:52, John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday, November 19, 2011 7:07:58 pm Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 11/18/11 17:09, nev...@tx.net wrote:
If you are performating a manual partion in 9.0-RC2 bsdinstall and you
delete any created partition except the most recently created one, the
total
On 11/18/11 17:09, nev...@tx.net wrote:
If you are performating a manual partion in 9.0-RC2 bsdinstall and you
delete any created partition except the most recently created one, the
total remaining space will be miscalculated. Reproducable as shown
below.
Workaround: if you delete a
On 11/07/11 11:20, Sean Bruno wrote:
I noted that we no longer have the disc1.iso in this release. What
should I use to populate a NFS rootfs for netinstalls?
This was what I had been using(8.2-RELEASE) to populate NFS roots for
netinstalls. This allowed you to boot up into something that was
On 10/15/11 01:12, Jayachandran C. wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Nathan Whitehorn
nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 10/14/11 14:10, Jayachandran C. wrote:
I'm planning commit this -CURRENT if there an no objections.
In the current implementation, phandle is used to store a pointer
On 10/14/11 14:10, Jayachandran C. wrote:
I'm planning commit this -CURRENT if there an no objections.
In the current implementation, phandle is used to store a pointer to
the location inside the device tree. Since phandle_t is u32, this
will not work on 64 bit platforms. With this fix, the
On 10/13/11 04:25, O. Hartmann wrote:
On 10/13/11 10:39, Johan Hendriks wrote:
Hello all.
I just used the 9.0 B3 installer, and it defaults to GPT, which is nice.
However, and there has been some discussions about it, it would be nice
if the installer warns me that i could get in trouble if i
On 10/08/11 19:25, Matt Thyer wrote:
On Oct 9, 2011 8:52 AM, Warren Blockwbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011, Glen Barber wrote:
On 10/8/11 5:40 PM, Warren Block wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011, Glen Barber wrote:
On 10/8/11 2:21 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Are there any general
On 09/27/11 08:24, Matt Thyer wrote:
On Sep 26, 2011 2:33 PM, Adrian Chaddadr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 26 September 2011 12:56, Kevin Obermankob6...@gmail.com wrote:
I suspect that the thumb drive is the issue, not FreeBSD.
I've booted the drive successfully on an older Via C3 board.
On 09/23/11 04:09, Fbsd8 wrote:
I have installed 9.0 bata2 from cd and the net. In both cases after the
completion of the install and rebooting, the bsdinstall scripts still
remain on the new installed system. If I interpret the code logic
correctly, bsdinstall can ONLY be used for an original
On 09/19/11 02:52, Fbsd8 wrote:
Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Thomas Mueller
mueller6727@bellsouth.net wrote:
Some more ideas on the new bsdinstaller cross my mind.
Since the way the bsdinstaller would make partitions is
unpredictable, at least to the uninitiated, and
On 09/15/11 14:57, Fbsd8 wrote:
Out of the 9 USA maps only us.iso.acc.kbd worked somewhat.
The keyboard 9 key block above the arrow keys don't function.
Issuing the man cmd_name command doe's display the man page,
but the {Page up, Page down keys } don't work.
Also when using the ee edit command
On 09/17/11 10:04, Adrian Chadd wrote:
.. maybe name that button skip then?
The button is provided by kbdmap, as is the entire screen. We could add
an installer mode to kbdmap that names it skip instead of cancel, of
course. I'm traveling for another 2 weeks and won't have time to do
that,
On 09/16/11 11:11, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 06:21:40PM +0200, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 09/08/11 16:22, mysph...@web.de wrote:
Hi there,
first off all I have to say, that your new Installer in FBSD v9.0 is
very well done.
I just found an option, which is not activated
On 09/11/11 13:31, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2011-Sep-11 11:31:54 +0300, Andriy Gapona...@freebsd.org wrote:
And I am actually wondering about -fno-unit-at-a-time option.
In my opinion this is an anti-optimization option and it can actually increase
a size of a final binary. In fact, it looks
On 09/08/11 16:22, mysph...@web.de wrote:
Hi there,
first off all I have to say, that your new Installer in FBSD v9.0 is
very well done.
I just found an option, which is not activated at this time. So I wanted
to ask, if it’s possible a bug or something like that.
I’ve tried to change
On 09/01/11 14:00, Matt Thyer wrote:
Shouldn't we use MBR partitioning instead of GPT for the memstick image ?
We won't need larger than 2TiB installation media for many decades!
It uses GPT so that the partition can be labeled, and fstab will not
need e.g. da0 hard-coded into it. makefs,
On 09/01/11 17:23, Matt Thyer wrote:
On Sep 2, 2011 5:25 AM, Warren Blockwbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sep 1, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Matt Thyer wrote:
Shouldn't we use MBR partitioning instead of GPT for the memstick image
?
It seems wrong to have
On 22 August 2011 10:21, Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote:
Doing it that way is really, really error-prone, because you have to guess
(a) whether gpart will accept certain configurations and (b) how it will
handle requests. On some schemes, partititions have to be aligned or sized
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.08.2011 4:00, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
The larger problem is that this behavior means that destroying gparts sometimes
doesn't work at
all. For instance, if you have nested partitioning like MBR+BSD (or EBR) it is
not possible to
destroy
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, Yampress wrote:
Welcome
I installed freebsd 9bata1 and noticed the installer does not create a user
account's home directory.
Have to manually create after installation.
This was due to a temporary regression in pw(8) that managed to sneak into
the BETA1 builds. It
On 08/20/11 02:22, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Freebsd-current.
Maybe, everything is reported already, but I think, that better I'll
be second, that no-one notice this:
Manual partitioning chosen
(1) Installer offer me bunch of Partition schemes, but only MBR
and BSD have sense. Why
On 08/10/11 18:17, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Jonathan Andersonjonat...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
Love the new installer, but I do have a very small criticism of the
guided partitioning screen: it's unclear at first glance which of the
available buttons (Create,
On 08/21/11 15:49, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Nathan Whitehorn
nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 08/18/11 18:24, Garrett Cooper wrote:
So, I used the bsdinstaller again on the 9.0-BETA1 media with manual
partitioning. The HP desktop ate up 3 partitions, I
On 08/21/11 15:53, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Mattsendtom...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/18/11 16:24, Garrett Cooper wrote:
So, I used the bsdinstaller again on the 9.0-BETA1 media with manual
partitioning. The HP desktop ate up 3 partitions, I inconveniently
forgot
On 08/21/11 14:41, Kevin Oberman wrote:
2011/8/21 Lev Serebryakovl...@freebsd.org:
Hello, Nathan.
You wrote 21 августа 2011 г., 20:53:22:
GPT is bootable on all x86 systems, with either EFI or BIOS, and is now
Ok, I was not sure here.
The Wikipedia article on GUID Partition Table states
On 08/21/11 18:11, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Aug 21, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
gpart does not support (well, anyway) changing the underlying partition table
format without committing changes. Replacing the partition scheme, which this
does, is such an operation.
Weird. I
On 08/21/11 20:28, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Aug 21, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
No, it's stupider than that. When you destroy a gpart without committing, the
GEOM itself lingers as a (none)-type partitioning. This of course makes sense,
since that ghost geom is what
(eg stuff which creates labels, raid
devices, etc) should manipulate this table, not the kernel.
Then when you're ready, you should write the updated table to disk.
2c,
Adrian
On 22 August 2011 09:48, Marcel Moolenaarmar...@xcllnt.net wrote:
On Aug 21, 2011, at 6:34 PM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote
On 08/18/11 18:24, Garrett Cooper wrote:
So, I used the bsdinstaller again on the 9.0-BETA1 media with manual
partitioning. The HP desktop ate up 3 partitions, I inconveniently
forgot that geom can't grok secondary PC MBR partitions, was fooling
around and cleared the partitions, etc. I hit
On 04/29/11 11:55, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 27.04.2011 11:37, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
I wrote a small extension for the GEOM_PART class. It adds an ability
to GEOM_PART class to create partition labels for schemes which are
support them.
Hi All,
i got several successful reports from
On 08/11/11 12:28, Vans wrote:
Hi.
No need, I think. There is a message box:
Error while fetching
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/i386/9.0-BETA1/base.txz:
File unavailable
(e.g., file not found, no access)
The 9.0-BETA1 ISOs cannot be used for network installations pending
On 08/05/11 11:01, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I netbooted 9.0 Beta and was going to try and install the system onto a
raid1 mirror built with graid. However, neither sysinstall nor
bsdinstall see it fully
I have the box netbooted (Intel Matrix raid)
Could you test the patch at
On 08/05/11 10:58, Lars Engels wrote:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 09:03:22PM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 08:28:34PM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 08:36:01AM -0500, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 08/02/11 04:41, Bruce Cran wrote:
I've been trying out
On 08/05/11 17:35, Kevin Oberman wrote:
I have installed 9-Beta1 using the new installation tool and I am
generally happy with it.
The new dialog cause me to need a few more key-strokes because I was
so used to the
old behavior, but it really is more intuitive and I would not want to
see the old
On 08/05/11 20:04, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Kevin Obermankob6...@gmail.com wrote:
I have installed 9-Beta1 using the new installation tool and I am
generally happy with it.
The new dialog cause me to need a few more key-strokes because I was
so used to the
old
On 08/06/11 12:18, Garrett Wollman wrote:
In article4e3d55fd.7090...@freebsd.org, nwhiteh...@freebsd.org writes:
I'm not entirely sure what you're referring to. Whenever you add a /
partition on a partitioning scheme that requires a boot partition (APM,
GPT on some platforms), the installer
On 08/03/11 14:42, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Marc Fonvieilleblack...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 08:28:34PM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 08:36:01AM -0500, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 08/02/11 04:41, Bruce Cran wrote:
I've
On 08/02/11 04:41, Bruce Cran wrote:
I've been trying out 9.0-BETA1: it's a lot easier to install than
previous releases with bsdinstall, but I spotted a few issues:
Good! Thanks for checking.
Typo - Resovler Configuration.
If I leave the resolver window for a while it gets corrupted with:
On 07/25/11 18:12, Vadim Goncharov wrote:
Hi Freddie Cash!
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 22:01:44 -0700; Freddie Cash wrote about 'Re: Trying to
install current from a memory stick and then a DVD and got a new and strange
installer.':
3) I see no post-install uses on the new one. Sysinstall could be
On 07/24/11 16:29, eculp wrote:
I have been hearing about a new installer but I obviously have not
payed enough attention, I am afraid. I started running freebsd at 2.0
and never really had a problem with understanding the installation
program. There is always a first time, I guess.
On 07/24/11 19:11, Claude Buisson wrote:
On 07/24/2011 23:33, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 07/24/11 16:29, eculp wrote:
I have been hearing about a new installer but I obviously have not
payed enough attention, I am afraid. I started running freebsd at 2.0
and never really had a problem
08:11, Claude Buissonclbuis...@orange.fr wrote:
On 07/24/2011 23:33, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 07/24/11 16:29, eculp wrote:
I have been hearing about a new installer but I obviously have not
payed enough attention, I am afraid. I started running freebsd at 2.0
and never really had a problem
On 07/24/11 18:03, Ron McDowell wrote:
Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 07/24/11 16:29, eculp wrote:
I have been hearing about a new installer but I obviously have not
payed enough attention, I am afraid. I started running freebsd at
2.0 and never really had a problem with understanding
, Adrian Chadd wrote:
.. wait, the install-off-USB doesn't default to a read-only boot?
Adrian
On 25 July 2011 08:11, Claude Buissonclbuis...@orange.frwrote:
On 07/24/2011 23:33, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 07/24/11 16:29, eculp wrote:
I have been hearing about a new installer but I obviously
On 07/24/11 20:03, Bruce Cran wrote:
On 25/07/2011 00:03, Ron McDowell wrote:
1) no back button/selection/mechanism on each screen. Rebooting
because I fat-fingered something on the previous screen is, well,
unacceptable.
2) no minimal install. Most of my installs are single- or few-task
On 07/06/11 13:00, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:05:41PM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message20110706170132.ga68...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu, Steve Kargl w
rites:
I periodically ran the same type test in the 2008 post over the
last three years. Nothing has changed.
On 06/23/11 16:57, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 06/23/11 18:29, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 06:12:54PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
...
SVN rev 223443 broke ATAPI support. SVN rev 223475 should fix it.
Thanks -- that did resolve the issue for me.
Peace,
david
Me, too.
Thanks,
On 06/23/11 17:17, Alexander Motin wrote:
Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
I'm still having problems with an ATA bus containing a DVD drive and a
Zip driver (da).
Can't it be some different problem? What are the symptoms?
Hanging in run_interrupt_driven_config_hooks, immediately after probing
101 - 200 of 254 matches
Mail list logo
