Re: problems on new -current install with pkg/ssl

thanks everyone it's working normally now after full buildworld kernel then forced rebuild of all ports from their updated sources --

Re: problems on new -current install with pkg/ssl

On 7/9/23 18:27, void wrote: On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 05:17:38PM +0100, void wrote: Hi, On a fresh 14-current install (main-n263444-653738e895ba) I try to use pkg for anything and this error happens: # pkg install doas The package management tool is not yet installed on your system. Do you

Re: problems on new -current install with pkg/ssl

On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 17:17:38 +0100 void wrote: > Hi, > > On a fresh 14-current install (main-n263444-653738e895ba) > I try to use pkg for anything and this error > happens: > > # pkg install doas > The package management tool is not yet installed on your system. > Do you want to fetch and install

Re: problems on new -current install with pkg/ssl

void wrote: > Hi, > > On a fresh 14-current install (main-n263444-653738e895ba) I try to use > pkg for anything and this error > happens: > > # pkg install doas > The package management tool is not yet installed on your system. > Do you want to fetch and install it now? [y/N]: y > Bootstrapping

Re: problems on new -current install with pkg/ssl

On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 05:17:38PM +0100, void wrote: > Hi, > > On a fresh 14-current install (main-n263444-653738e895ba) I try to use pkg > for anything and this error > happens: > > # pkg install doas > The package management tool is not yet installed on your system. > Do you want to fetch and

Re: problems on new -current install with pkg/ssl

On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 05:17:38PM +0100, void wrote: Hi, On a fresh 14-current install (main-n263444-653738e895ba) I try to use pkg for anything and this error happens: # pkg install doas The package management tool is not yet installed on your system. Do you want to fetch and install it now?

Re: Problems with /usr/src/usr.bin/rs/rs.c

> On Nov 25, 2022, at 2:53 AM, Jochen Neumeister wrote: > > Hi, > > > this is a problem on 2 CURRENT Maschines. > > Both stop with this: > > cc -target x86_64-unknown-freebsd14.0 > --sysroot=/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp > -B/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/usr/bin -O2 -pipe

Re: Problems compiling kernel

On 2021-Dec-30, at 13:27, Mark Millard wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> on a system updated yesterday I get >> >> tuexen_at_head:~/freebsd-src % git branch >> * main >> tuexen_at_head:~/freebsd-src % git pull >> Already up to date. >> tuexen_at_head:~/freebsd-src % uname -a >> FreeBSD head

Re: Problems compiling kernel

> Dear all, > > on a system updated yesterday I get > > tuexen_at_head:~/freebsd-src % git branch > * main > tuexen_at_head:~/freebsd-src % git pull > Already up to date. > tuexen_at_head:~/freebsd-src % uname -a > FreeBSD head 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #1 main-n252035-63f7f3921bd: >

Re: Problems compiling kernel

> On 30. Dec 2021, at 20:42, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 08:33:09PM +0100, tue...@freebsd.org wrote: >>> On 30. Dec 2021, at 20:26, Michael Gmelin wrote: >>> >>> This should have been resolved today in >>>

Re: Problems compiling kernel

On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 08:33:09PM +0100, tue...@freebsd.org wrote: > > On 30. Dec 2021, at 20:26, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > > This should have been resolved today in > > https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=5e6a2d6eb220d780c9128c81b58f133114061415 > I do have that commit locally in the

Re: Problems compiling kernel

> On 30. Dec 2021, at 20:26, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > This should have been resolved today in > https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=5e6a2d6eb220d780c9128c81b58f133114061415 I do have that commit locally in the tree... But I can't build world or kernel. Looking for libc++.so.1 I get

Re: Problems compiling kernel

This should have been resolved today in https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=5e6a2d6eb220d780c9128c81b58f133114061415 -m > On 30. Dec 2021, at 20:17, tue...@freebsd.org wrote: > Dear all, > > on a system updated yesterday I get > > tuexen@head:~/freebsd-src % git branch > * main >

Re: Problems with getting a crash dump

Thanks for the replies! I finally managed to solve the issue. For some reason when I get a panic while i915kms is active I am unable to write `continue` in KDB. Also the KDB prompt was not even displayed so I had no idea that I should write that command. After I added debug.debugger_on_panic=0 to

Re: Problems in pkg

On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 02:01:09PM -0300, Cristian Cardoso wrote: > The problem was actually user nobody, which was deleted from the system. > I recreated and solved the problem. > > Em qua., 10 de nov. de 2021 às 06:36, Baptiste Daroussin > escreveu: > > > > On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 03:48:51PM

Re: Problems in pkg

The problem was actually user nobody, which was deleted from the system. I recreated and solved the problem. Em qua., 10 de nov. de 2021 às 06:36, Baptiste Daroussin escreveu: > > On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 03:48:51PM -0300, Cristian Cardoso wrote: > > I'm trying to use pkg to install/update

Re: Problems in pkg

On 08/11/2021 18:48, Cristian Cardoso wrote: pkg: Unable to drop privileges: No error: 0 pkg: No signature found Cross-reference for FreeBSD 13.0⋯

Re: Problems with getting a crash dump

On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 07:08:31PM +, Alexander wrote: > Hello, I am currently using FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT and I found a bug that > triggers a kernel panic. I wanted to make a kernel crash dump to further > investigate the issue, but after a few tries I still did not manage to do it. > I

Re: Problems with getting a crash dump

On Mon, 08 Nov 2021 19:08:31 + Alexander wrote: > Hello, I am currently using FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT and I found a bug > that triggers a kernel panic. I wanted to make a kernel crash dump to > further investigate the issue, but after a few tries I still did not > manage to do it. I started by

Re: Problems with realtek NIC

Am 02.05.21 um 01:37 schrieb Greg Rivers: > On Saturday, 1 May 2021 16:45:03 CDT Stefan Esser wrote: >> Am 01.05.21 um 21:48 schrieb Greg Rivers via freebsd-current: >>> On Saturday, 1 May 2021 14:09:46 CDT Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: I using a FreeBSD 14-Current and get random error with my

Re: Problems with realtek NIC

On Saturday, 1 May 2021 16:45:03 CDT Stefan Esser wrote: > Am 01.05.21 um 21:48 schrieb Greg Rivers via freebsd-current: > > On Saturday, 1 May 2021 14:09:46 CDT Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > >> I using a FreeBSD 14-Current and get random error with my NIC. The > >> watchdog timer send a timeout

Re: Problems with realtek NIC

Am 01.05.21 um 21:48 schrieb Greg Rivers via freebsd-current: > On Saturday, 1 May 2021 14:09:46 CDT Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: >> I using a FreeBSD 14-Current and get random error with my NIC. The watchdog >> timer send a timeout message and I loose connection temporaly. In logs show >> only this

Re: Problems with realtek NIC

On Saturday, 1 May 2021 14:09:46 CDT Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > I using a FreeBSD 14-Current and get random error with my NIC. The watchdog > timer send a timeout message and I loose connection temporaly. In logs show > only this message: > Switch to the official Realtek driver in ports:

Re: Problems with realtek NIC

On 01.05.2021 21.09, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: Hi all I using a FreeBSD 14-Current and get random error with my NIC. The watchdog timer send a timeout message and I loose connection temporaly. In logs show only this message: May 1 14:24:18 valfenda kernel: re0: watchdog timeout May 1

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X [solved]

On 4/14/21 5:16 PM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: On 4/14/21 4:27 PM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: "-s uvc_driver.quirks=0x100" When I start webcamd with this, return a LONG list of other variables and webcamd not run. Is it right? Try: "-m uvc_driver.quirks=0x100" It's

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

On 4/14/21 4:27 PM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: "-s uvc_driver.quirks=0x100" When I start webcamd with this, return a LONG list of other variables and webcamd not run. Is it right? Try: "-m uvc_driver.quirks=0x100" --HPS ___

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

> > Hi, > > The following thread suggests using a UVC quirk: > > https://sourceforge.net/p/linux-uvc/mailman/linux-uvc-devel/?viewmonth=202102 > > Translated to webcamd parameters, it becomes: > > "-s uvc_driver.quirks=0x100" When I start webcamd with this, return a LONG list of

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

On 4/14/21 4:15 PM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: The last version tha I Know that work need libhal, Just do "make config" and de-select HAL support, before building. Webcamd doesn't need it. --HPS ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

> > On 4/14/21 3:41 PM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > Hi, > :< - CUT - >: > Does downgrading webcamd to an older version make it work again? > > I probably need to search for that error message. Maybe it is a known > issue already fixed. So far it looks like a

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

Hi, The following thread suggests using a UVC quirk: https://sourceforge.net/p/linux-uvc/mailman/linux-uvc-devel/?viewmonth=202102 Translated to webcamd parameters, it becomes: "-s uvc_driver.quirks=0x100" Can you try that? --HPS ___

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

> > Hi, > > On 4/14/21 1:10 PM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > > root@valfenda:/usr/ports/multimedia/webcamd # webcamd -d ugem1.3 -m > > uvc_driver.trace=1 > ^^^ ugem -> ugen > > ugen was spelled wrong. Ops .. Sorry. output

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

Hi, On 4/14/21 1:10 PM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: root@valfenda:/usr/ports/multimedia/webcamd # webcamd -d ugem1.3 -m uvc_driver.trace=1 ^^^ ugem -> ugen ugen was spelled wrong. --HPS ___

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

> > On 4/14/21 3:49 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > >> > >> On 4/14/21 3:05 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > >>> 22:03:30.860068 usbus1.3 > >>> SUBM-ISOC-EP=0081,SPD=HIGH,NFR=128,SLEN=0,IVAL=0 > >>> 22:03:30.860079 usbus1.3 > >>> DONE-ISOC-EP=0081,SPD=HIGH,NFR=128,SLEN=13608,IVAL=0,ERR=0 >

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

On 4/14/21 3:49 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: On 4/14/21 3:05 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: 22:03:30.860068 usbus1.3 SUBM-ISOC-EP=0081,SPD=HIGH,NFR=128,SLEN=0,IVAL=0 22:03:30.860079 usbus1.3 DONE-ISOC-EP=0081,SPD=HIGH,NFR=128,SLEN=13608,IVAL=0,ERR=0 :< CUT >: Hi, I see

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

> > On 4/14/21 3:05 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > > 22:03:30.860068 usbus1.3 > > SUBM-ISOC-EP=0081,SPD=HIGH,NFR=128,SLEN=0,IVAL=0 > > 22:03:30.860079 usbus1.3 > > DONE-ISOC-EP=0081,SPD=HIGH,NFR=128,SLEN=13608,IVAL=0,ERR=0 :< CUT >: > > Hi, > > I see data is received, so

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

On 4/14/21 3:10 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: On 4/14/21 1:38 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: The webcamd create two devices ( /dev/video{0,1} ) and the pwcview open the window, but not show image, onle a green screen, but the webcam active LED turn on. But in my old

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

> > On 4/14/21 3:05 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > > 22:03:30.860068 usbus1.3 > > SUBM-ISOC-EP=0081,SPD=HIGH,NFR=128,SLEN=0,IVAL=0 > > 22:03:30.860079 usbus1.3 > > DONE-ISOC-EP=0081,SPD=HIGH,NFR=128,SLEN=13608,IVAL=0,ERR=0 > > 22:03:30.876112 usbus1.3 > >

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

> > On 4/14/21 1:38 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > > The webcamd create two devices ( /dev/video{0,1} ) and the pwcview open > > the window, but not show image, onle a green screen, but the webcam active > > LED turn on. But in my old instalations ( 13-Current (Nov or Dec of 2019 )

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

On 4/14/21 3:05 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: 22:03:30.860068 usbus1.3 SUBM-ISOC-EP=0081,SPD=HIGH,NFR=128,SLEN=0,IVAL=0 22:03:30.860079 usbus1.3 DONE-ISOC-EP=0081,SPD=HIGH,NFR=128,SLEN=13608,IVAL=0,ERR=0 22:03:30.876112 usbus1.3 SUBM-ISOC-EP=0081,SPD=HIGH,NFR=128,SLEN=0,IVAL=0

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

> > On 4/14/21 2:49 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > > ugen1.3: at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH > > (480Mbps) pwr=ON (500mA) > > Hi, > > This webcam is connected VIA USB2.0 protocols only. No USB 3.x involved. I try to connect in 2.0, 3.0 and 3.1 ports, and nothing worked. > >

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

On 4/14/21 1:38 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: The webcamd create two devices ( /dev/video{0,1} ) and the pwcview open the window, but not show image, onle a green screen, but the webcam active LED turn on. You should only use the first of the two devices. The second device is for

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

On 4/14/21 2:49 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: ugen1.3: at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=ON (500mA) Hi, This webcam is connected VIA USB2.0 protocols only. No USB 3.x involved. Unstable picture may indicate a bandwidth problem. You can also compile webcamd with debugging and

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

> > > > On 4/13/21 8:14 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > On 4/14/21 1:38 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > >> ?? The USB 3.1 not was reconise by FreeBSD. > >> > >> ?? when I create a meet in Jitsi, the webcam show image, but its seens > >> like loose horizontal and vertical sync. > > > > What

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

On 4/13/21 8:14 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On 4/14/21 1:38 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote:   The USB 3.1 not was reconise by FreeBSD.   when I create a meet in Jitsi, the webcam show image, but its seens like loose horizontal and vertical sync. What does usbconfig say about the webcam?

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

On 4/14/21 1:38 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: Apr 13 20:28:43 valfenda kernel: pcm6: unregister: mixer busy Apr 13 20:28:43 valfenda kernel: pcm6: Waiting for sound application to exit! Apr 13 20:28:43 valfenda kernel: pcm6: unregister: mixer busy Apr 13 20:28:43 valfenda kernel: pcm6: Waiting

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

On 4/14/21 1:38 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: The USB 3.1 not was reconise by FreeBSD. when I create a meet in Jitsi, the webcam show image, but its seens like loose horizontal and vertical sync. What does usbconfig say about the webcam? Any errors in dmesg? --HPS

Re: Problems with AMDGPU and two grafic cards

Hi Pete,  did BIOS update,  has been critical.  in the meantime with lot o'luck I got the scfb-driver to work but only in 1024x76 (but the bios-logo starting in 1920x1280) and with 'dbus-launch kstart5 plasmashell' I have a root-login to plasmashell.  I guess I can add further video-modes to

Re: Problems with AMDGPU and two grafic cards

On 10/18/19 3:07 PM, mms.vanbreukelin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Pete, did BIOS update,  has been critical.  in the meantime with lot o'luck I got the scfb-driver to work but only in 1024x76 (but the bios-logo starting in 1920x1280) and with 'dbus-launch kstart5 plasmashell' I have a

Re: Problems upgrading -current with pkgbase

On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 2:46 PM Kyle Evans wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 4:37 AM Andreas Nilsson > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I'm trying to upgrade my -current with pkgbase, using boot environments: > > $ bectl list > > BE Active Mountpoint Space Created > > 13C-20190902 NR

Re: Problems upgrading -current with pkgbase

On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 4:37 AM Andreas Nilsson wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm trying to upgrade my -current with pkgbase, using boot environments: > $ bectl list > BE Active Mountpoint Space Created > 13C-20190902 NR / 72.3G 2019-09-02 13:43 > 13C-20190916 -

Re: problems on lists.freebsd.org error 503 backend fetch failed

Hi! > Hi, if there's a better place to report this then please advise cluster...@freebsd.org or postmas...@freebsd.org -- they are informed about it already. > It seems the web-mail-list software for FreeBSD has failed partially (mostly?) It's the load-balancer in front of the mailman instance

Re: problems with mouse

Dear folks, I am not sure if hald_enable="YES" is still needed, but I will add it to see if the mouse problem goes away, because mouse works, but when I switch apps, ie. firefox to xterm, then I cannot switch back to firefox till I finish with xterm :(. If it works well and fixes the problem, I

Re: problems with mouse

On Mon, 29 Aug 2016, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On 08/29/16 22:12, Antonio Olivares wrote: I apologize in advance if this is not in the right list, if I need to pose this question in questions, I will do so as soon as I find out. I am having trouble with switching apps in Lumina desktop with

Re: problems with mouse

I do not know what could be the problem, but if I restart the machine, I get the functionality back. I use the scroll ability and learned to cut and paste using xterm only. It is then when I lose the functionality. I right click and or left-click and I cannot switch from browser to xterm. I

Re: problems with mouse

On 08/29/16 22:12, Antonio Olivares wrote: Dear folks, I apologize in advance if this is not in the right list, if I need to pose this question in questions, I will do so as soon as I find out. I am having trouble with switching apps in Lumina desktop with the mouse, I removed moused from

Re: Problems with building rescue are solved

On Tue, 7 Jul 2015 19:37+0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote: Hi, I guess both the instructions for enabling DTrace, https://wiki.freebsd.org/DTrace/KernelSupport and r284356 are to blame. I suggest the wiki be amended with: STRIP=: or some other innocuous command like 'echo --'. On

Re: Problems building head, probably r281198

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 06:09:04 -0700 David Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org wrote: Running: FreeBSD g1-254.catwhisker.org 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #25 r281143M/281144:1100067: Mon Apr 6 08:30:10 PDT 2015

Re: Problems with zpool upgrade embedded_data, and rebooting

On 2014.08.08 17:41, Daniel Peyrolon wrote: What would be the better way to avoid this happening in the future? Always update the bootloader before doing a zpool upgrade on your root pool. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Problems with zpool upgrade embedded_data, and rebooting

Daniel Peyrolon wrote this message on Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 00:41 +0200: Hello everyone, I just would like to gratuitously rant about something that happened on my machine. Basically, I upgraded my zpool to use embedded_data, since it would be more efficient, and rebooted. (I installed the

Re: Problems with zpool upgrade embedded_data, and rebooting

On 2014-08-08 19:23, John-Mark Gurney wrote: Daniel Peyrolon wrote this message on Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 00:41 +0200: Hello everyone, I just would like to gratuitously rant about something that happened on my machine. Basically, I upgraded my zpool to use embedded_data, since it would be

Re: Problems starting X on Mac using vesa, radeon or intel drivers when running FreeBSD-CURRENT in EFI

On 23.07.2014 22:18, Lokadamus wrote: Am 20.07.2014 18:19, schrieb Anders Bolt-Evensen: info: [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20080730 1.6.0 20080730 looks old for me. Have a look at https://wiki.freebsd.org/Graphics section Installing KMS Ports 1.6.0 is the version of the kernel driver, not

Re: Problems starting X on Mac using vesa, radeon or intel drivers when running FreeBSD-CURRENT in EFI

On 20.07.2014 18:19, Anders Bolt-Evensen wrote: Hello, everyone! Hi! When I try to use the radeon driver, X exits because of BIOS errors (since I do not use BIOS when in EFI mode), as can be seen from the output of dmesg -a from a verbose boot (at the time dmesg -a was run, I had commented

Re: Problems starting X on Mac using vesa, radeon or intel drivers when running FreeBSD-CURRENT in EFI

Am 20.07.2014 18:19, schrieb Anders Bolt-Evensen: Hello, everyone! Last week, I created a custom ISO from the latest -CURRENT sources which contained an EFI image that is bootable on my MacBook Pro. Both installation and booting from this new FreeBSD 11 EFI system goes without any problems.

Re: Problems starting X on Mac using vesa, radeon or intel drivers when running FreeBSD-CURRENT in EFI

What I did was: Install subversion either from ports or via pkg install Get the newest source code from FreeBSD by running the command svn checkout svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /usr/src (or whatever directory you might choose, I used /usr/src) Then I ran make buildworld from the new

Re: Problems starting X on Mac using vesa, radeon or intel drivers when running FreeBSD-CURRENT in EFI

Last week, I created a custom ISO from the latest -CURRENT sources which contained an EFI image that is bootable on my MacBook Pro. Both installation and booting from this new FreeBSD 11 EFI system goes without any problems. Somewhat off-topic, but can you detail how you did this? I've been

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

Trimmed CC a bit. On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:42:20PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: On Jun 23, 2014, at 8:24 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote: I sort of typed what I meant a bit backwards from what I intended to write. What I meant (sort of) is, I would like to discuss our forward

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Jun 24, 2014, at 8:43 AM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote: Trimmed CC a bit. On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:42:20PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: On Jun 23, 2014, at 8:24 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote: I sort of typed what I meant a bit backwards from what I intended to write.

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 18:55:40 -0400, Glen Barber writes: make make make -j8 -DNO_CLEAN buildworld This is, IMHO, the worst solution I've heard on this topic so far. I didn't say it was a good solution - but if you want -j you may not have a choice (unless you fix src/Makefile).

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote: OK. I must be daft, or maybe just missing something. But I can build 9.3 almost branch point on a current jail running on a 10.x system (to simulate the 9 on current case). I don't see the problem being talked about at all.

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Jun 23, 2014, at 5:02 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote: OK. I must be daft, or maybe just missing something. But I can build 9.3 almost branch point on a current jail running on a 10.x system (to

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote: Which bombing out are you seeing (two or three have been sighted in this thread)? And is this a nanobsd build, or a straight buildworld? When building FreeNAS, with a hacked the nanobsd script to does make make buildworld,

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Jun 23, 2014, at 5:19 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote: On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote: Which bombing out are you seeing (two or three have been sighted in this thread)? And is this a nanobsd build, or a straight buildworld? When

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

Hi, OK, I think I see the issue. I looked here: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/9/share/mk/bsd.prog.mk?view=log and saw that dim@ MFC'd his EARLY_BUILD stuff in r257812. That is why you can build stable/9 on a stable/10 host. I am building FreeBSD 9.2 which doesn't have that change.

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Jun 23, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi, OK, I think I see the issue. I looked here: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/9/share/mk/bsd.prog.mk?view=log and saw that dim@ MFC'd his EARLY_BUILD stuff in r257812. That is why you can build stable/9

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 06:57:15PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: On Jun 23, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote: So, I guess that stable/9 can build properly on a stable/10 box. For FreeBSD 9.2, there is no easy way out. You’ll have to back port the patch then. We don’t

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Jun 23, 2014, at 7:12 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote: On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 06:57:15PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: On Jun 23, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote: So, I guess that stable/9 can build properly on a stable/10 box. For FreeBSD 9.2, there is no

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 07:42:27PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: On Jun 23, 2014, at 7:12 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote: On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 06:57:15PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: On Jun 23, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote: So, I guess that stable/9

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Jun 23, 2014, at 8:24 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote: On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 07:42:27PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: On Jun 23, 2014, at 7:12 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote: On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 06:57:15PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: On Jun 23, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Craig

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 03:05:05PM -0700, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: Removal of EARLY_BUILD is not the issue here, I have no idea where the hell the came into play. It is a race in the chain with what make(1) gets built for the stable/9 userland. It is why the 'make make buildworld' thing I

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

Removal of EARLY_BUILD is not the issue here, I have no idea where the hell the came into play. It is a race in the chain with what make(1) gets built for the stable/9 userland. It is why the 'make make buildworld' thing I mentioned works. IIRC all the fixes I put into src/Makefile to ensure

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On 6/18/14, 4:05 AM, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:35:42 -0700, Craig Rodrigues writes: Do you know if there is some sort of patch that can be applied to FreeBSD stable/9 sources so that it can be built on a FreeBSD 10/stable, or FreeBSD CURRENT host with bmake? You would

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Jun 18, 2014, at 4:32 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote: See r257658 which had fixed this, but it was reverted by Warner, unfortunately. This was one of the uses of the EARLY_BUILD flag which was *not*

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:00:03PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: On Jun 18, 2014, at 4:32 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote: See r257658 which had fixed this, but it was reverted by Warner,

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On 18 Jun 2014, at 01:33, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote: For what it is worth, I'm working around this problem by running: # make

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote: See r257658 which had fixed this, but it was reverted by Warner, unfortunately. This was one of the uses of the EARLY_BUILD flag which was *not* redundant. :-/ Warner, Is there a way to bring back the behavior of

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Jun 18, 2014, at 12:59 AM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote: On 18 Jun 2014, at 01:33, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote: For

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Jun 18, 2014, at 4:32 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote: See r257658 which had fixed this, but it was reverted by Warner, unfortunately. This was one of the uses of the EARLY_BUILD flag which was *not*

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

Simon, Do you know if there is some sort of patch that can be applied to FreeBSD stable/9 sources so that it can be built on a FreeBSD 10/stable, or FreeBSD CURRENT host with bmake? I'm trying to build a FreeBSD stable/9 jail on a FreeBSD 10/stable host, so that I can build ports inside the jail

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:35:42 -0700, Craig Rodrigues writes: Do you know if there is some sort of patch that can be applied to FreeBSD stable/9 sources so that it can be built on a FreeBSD 10/stable, or FreeBSD CURRENT host with bmake? You would likely need to apply many of the changes made in

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Simon J. Gerraty s...@juniper.net wrote: On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:35:42 -0700, Craig Rodrigues writes: Do you know if there is some sort of patch that can be applied to FreeBSD stable/9 sources so that it can be built on a FreeBSD 10/stable, or FreeBSD CURRENT host

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org writes: On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Simon J. Gerraty s...@juniper.net wrote: On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:35:42 -0700, Craig Rodrigues writes: Do you know if there is some sort of patch that can be applied to FreeBSD stable/9 sources so that it can be built

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote: Simon, Do you know if there is some sort of patch that can be applied to FreeBSD stable/9 sources so that it can be built on a FreeBSD 10/stable, or FreeBSD CURRENT host with bmake? I'm trying to build a FreeBSD

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 01:43:55PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Simon J. Gerraty s...@juniper.net wrote: Why not use fmake in that scenario? That might work. Is using the devel/fmake port sufficient for using fmake? If I typed make something, is there a

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Jun 17, 2014, at 3:14 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 01:43:55PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Simon J. Gerraty s...@juniper.net wrote: Why not use fmake in that scenario? That might work. Is using the devel/fmake port

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote: For what it is worth, I'm working around this problem by running: # make make buildworld -jN [...] Note the extra 'make', which rather than relying on the bootstrap-tools to determine which make to build, I am

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

Sorry, I didn't speak to the problem you hit... On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:35:42 -0700, Craig Rodrigues writes: If I build like this: env TARGET=amd64 TARGET_ARCH=amd64 make -j 9 SRCCONF=/dev/null __MAKE_CONF=/opt/local/branches/freenas/os-base/amd64/make.conf.build NO_CLEAN=1 buildworld I get

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

Why not use fmake in that scenario? That might work. Is using the devel/fmake port sufficient for using fmake? So long as it is recent enough to have :tu and :tl I would expect so. If I typed make something, is there a way inside the make environment to detect if bmake or fmake was invoked,

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote: For what it is worth, I'm working around this problem by running: # make make buildworld -jN [...] Note the extra 'make', which rather than

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 04:33:11PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote: For what it is worth, I'm working around this problem by running: # make

Re: problems with pkg2ng

On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 11:05:21PM -0300, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: Hi all, in the near past, when I update ports repository via svn, I always use pkg2ng to upgrade (or update?) the database, but today I can not do it. The command pkg2ng show this error message:

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >