> Mark, Poul-Henning,
>
> So, what was the concensus? Should we fix this in Makefile,
> or just put this as an UPDATING entry and have users manually
> remove the old UUCP stuff?
Erm, it _is_ "fixed" in the makefile. If you have a better method, lets hear
it. :-)
M
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 0
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dillon 2001/11/16 19:07:12 PST
>
> Modified files:
>sys/compat/svr4 svr4_stream.c
>sys/kern kern_descrip.c sys_socket.c uipc_socket.c
> uipc_socket2.c uipc_syscalls.c
John
I have a patch (courtesy of Brian Somers) that fixes M3. I believe
he has submitted it to you.
May I/We commit it?
M
> Hello all,
>Sounds like a silly place to post this but...here goes. I'm getting errors
> compiling cvsup from ports. The ports tree installed is the default coming
XawTV dump a core in CURRENT?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
>
> John
>
> I have a patch (courtesy of Brian Somers) that fixes M3. I believe
> he has submitted it to you.
>
> May I/We commit it?
>
> M
>
could this patch please be made available via HTTP or anon FTP?
so those of us unable to install cvsup can get it? :) thnx
-Erik <[EMAIL PROT
I just rebooted and was put into single user with the following message:
/boot/kernel/kernel: KLD linprocfs.ko: depends on linux - not available
I just had to comment out my linproc entry in fstab and booted fine but
linux emulation doesn't work.
If I try to load it manually, I get and Exec f
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cyrille Lefevre writes:
: I don't know -current. what is the feature which replace kget ?
: does boot -c (or whatever) still exists ? is it possible to
: edit .hints at boot time ?
set/unset works.
I've removed ISA devices at boot time by unsetting the 'at' hint.
I've just finished a three-day download, at a monsterous 2.0KB/sec,
of ``nopkg-5.0-CURRENT-2005-JPSNAP.iso'' from snapshots.jp.cur-
rent.org. I had to toss my 2001 snapshot because it still had
the /mnt/dev sysinstall problem which was apparently fixed as of
2002.
nelsont> I had to toss my 2001 snapshot because it still had
nelsont> the /mnt/dev sysinstall problem which was apparently
nelsont> fixed as of 2002. It isn't.
I'll try to investigate tomorrow (strictly speaking, 'late today in
JST'; I'm sleepy), but according to my intuitio
On Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 05:10:30AM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
>
> nelsont> I had to toss my 2001 snapshot because it still had
> nelsont> the /mnt/dev sysinstall problem which was apparently
> nelsont> fixed as of 2002. It isn't.
>
> I'll try to investigate tomorrow (st
Hi,
i dont know where is the right place for this questions.
On my -current FreeBSD system exist a USB device which is not always
attached. My amd is configured to automount this device:
cam type:=pcfs;dev:=/dev/da0s1;opts:=rw
which runs quite fine, if the device is attached at boo
Are y'all going to discuss this at BSDCon? I'm probably going there
and would like to contribute if I could.
Later,
George
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
I recommend you all look at The Click Modular router
http://www.pdos.lcs.mit.edu/click/
which is a step in the right direction.
Of course given the current architecture it may be very hard
to adapt it to this kind of model.
I led/worked on a project at Wind River Systems to do a multi-instance
Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cyrille Lefevre writes:
> : I don't know -current. what is the feature which replace kget ?
> : does boot -c (or whatever) still exists ? is it possible to
> : edit .hints at boot time ?
>
> set/unset works.
>
> I've removed ISA devices at boot
* George V. Neville-Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07 16:17] wrote:
> I recommend you all look at The Click Modular router
>
> http://www.pdos.lcs.mit.edu/click/
>
> which is a step in the right direction.
>
> Of course given the current architecture it may be very hard
> to adapt it to this kin
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cyrille Lefevre writes:
: Warner Losh wrote:
: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cyrille Lefevre writes:
: > : I don't know -current. what is the feature which replace kget ?
: > : does boot -c (or whatever) still exists ? is it possible to
: > : edit .hints at boot t
Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cyrille Lefevre writes
:
> : Warner Losh wrote:
> : > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cyrille Lefevre wr
ites:
> : > : I don't know -current. what is the feature which replace kget ?
> : > : does boot -c (or whatever) still exists ? is it
Edwin Culp wrote:
> I just rebooted and was put into single user with the following message:
>
> /boot/kernel/kernel: KLD linprocfs.ko: depends on linux - not available
>
> I just had to comment out my linproc entry in fstab and booted fine but
> linux emulation doesn't work.
>
> If I try to
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Peter Wemm writes:
: Warner Losh wrote:
: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cyrille Lefevre writes
: :
: > : Warner Losh wrote:
: > : > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cyrille Lefevre wr
: ites:
: > : > : I don't know -current. what is the feature which replace
Warner Losh wrote:
[snip]
> Actually, now that I think about it, the module I saw was in 'C'. So
> someone needs to learn forth to do this. :-)
what are you waiting for ? :P
it's still possible to install gforth (don't know if it's compatible
w/ loader ?) and to begin to read the gforth info fi
On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Mark Murray wrote:
> > Mark, Poul-Henning,
> >
> > So, what was the concensus? Should we fix this in Makefile,
> > or just put this as an UPDATING entry and have users manually
> > remove the old UUCP stuff?
>
> Erm, it _is_ "fixed" in the makefile. If you have a better meth
21 matches
Mail list logo
