Hi,
With a kernel from 07:00 (UTC) this morning I started to get a panic every
time during the startup of Windowmaker.
After configuring the system for making a crashdump, I get "panic: Timeout
table full" halfway through the dump.
This is on a stock PII system (weirdest hardware is a ZIP drive
If you get "Device not configured" message, apply following patch and
do 'sysctl -w hw.intpm_poll=1'.If your system is SMP, 'hw.intpm_poll' value
is 1 as a default.(Not tested.)
This is not *the right* solution,but it will work I think.
Takanori Watanabe
http://www.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp/~takawa
It has been getting worse and worse for me recently. The two
applications where it is noticeable are netscape, and word
(im)perfect. I was using the linux version of netscape, until
recently when it began hanging for long periods of time during
network or disk activity. For a while with WP, it
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David
>Scheidt writes:
> : It doesn't run on FreeBSD, but Sybase uses block devices for its dedicated
> : disk devices. There may be other RDBMSes that do this.
>
> EVERY RDBMS that I've ever seen or had to make work wit
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, David Scheidt wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Kirk McKusick wrote:
>
> > I would like to take a step back from the debate for a moment and
> > ask the bigger question: How many real-world applications actually
> > use the block device interface? I know of none whatsoever. All
On Wednesday, 13 October 1999 at 21:38:07 +0200, Marc van Woerkom wrote:
> I got a stop here:
>
> root@oranje# date; make buildworld
> Wed Oct 13 15:34:04 CEST 1999
> (...)
> cc -O -pipe -DVINUMDEBUG -g -O -DKERNEL -Wall -Wredundant-decls
>-Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -W
Thanks for your suggestion. I haven't found anything in the archives that seems
to apply. Any help from "current"?
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: RE: /dev/smb0 on Dell Latitude
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 17:53:06 -0500
From: "Alejandro Ramirez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
You s
I'm building world on an Alpha and have run into this:
building shared library libc_r.so.4
sigpending.So: In function `sigpending':
sigpending.S:2: multiple definition of `sigpending'
uthread_sigpending.So(.text+0x0):uthread_sigpending.c: first defined here
/usr/obj/a/src/tmp/usr/libexec/elf/ld:
At 13/10/99, Marc van Woerkom wrote:
> /usr/src/sys/modules/vinum/../../dev/vinum/vinumioctl.c: In function
> `vinumioctl':
> /usr/src/sys/modules/vinum/../../dev/vinum/vinumioctl.c:333: too few
> arguments to function `initsd'
> *** Error code 1
Me too ...
Best Regards,
Gianmar
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> FreeBSD Bob writes:
: The DPT did not run at all.
I do not have access to the DPT controllers, nor to a EISA system for
testing.
: The 1540A did not run the 3.3 or 3.2,
: but came up fine on 2.2.6 or 2.2.8. That got me to thinking that
: something had changed i
I also must agree for many tasks, IP filter proves superior than IPFW and
NATD for many things which I do.
It seems much more straightforward, more configurable, and also in many
respects more stable and reliable.
It would not bother me in the least if they simply yanked ipfw and natd
from the s
> Hi
>
>What depth of FreeBSD's support for Linux applications under
>FreeBSD 4.0? I can't seem to find adequate information online.
>Does the support comply with our current requirements for Linux?:
>
>minimum kernel version: 2.0.34
>minimum glibc version:
I got a stop here:
root@oranje# date; make buildworld
Wed Oct 13 15:34:04 CEST 1999
(...)
cc -O -pipe -DVINUMDEBUG -g -O -DKERNEL -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual
-fformat-extensions -ansi -
>
> Just a followup question on my question from a week ago or so ther was
> indeed a stack overflow I'd guess- I check the code path more carefully
> and there was a 2KB stack buffer there (oof)- and removing it seemed to
> make the problem go awaySo the question here is "Shouldn't this
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Darryl Okahata writes:
> : If he can't, I've got a 1540A somewhere (in theory ;-) that I'd be
> : willing to lend out (if the address is in the US). It's been years
> : since I've used it, and so I'm not 100% sure that it still works,
> : though.
>
> Well, I
On Wed, 13 Oct 1999, mariusz wrote:
>What depth of FreeBSD's support for Linux applications under
>FreeBSD 4.0?
Pretty good - most things run without problems. But, the only definitive
answer is "try it and see".
>Does the support comply with our current requirements for Linux?:
>
Thomas Stromberg wrote:
>
> It's a shame that no one seems to want to maintain ipfilter in our tree.
> As far as a 'port building kld', I think this may not be the 'smartest'
> way, seeing as anyone who is running a serious firewall would disable
> kld's immediately anyhow.
Your concerns notwith
Doug Rabson wrote:
>
> On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Chuck Robey wrote:
>
> > I'm looking at sys/boot/common/pnp.c so I can find out how pnp is handled,
> > and I found something called a COMMAND_SET, and I can't figure out what it
> > means. Any takers?
>
> COMMAND_SET is a macro which is used to buil
Chuck Robey wrote:
>
> I'm looking at sys/boot/common/pnp.c so I can find out how pnp is handled,
> and I found something called a COMMAND_SET, and I can't figure out what it
> means. Any takers?
It's a macro. :-) I thought it was defined in that same directory,
even. It makes a list that is u
Marc van Woerkom wrote:
>
> Drawback is speed. While CVSup mirrors the CVS repository quite fast
> I now need an additional cvs update to sync my source tree with the
> CVS repository. And that is quite slow. (But I am working on a
> program that will speed up this process)
Use a local cvsup dae
Hi,
From: Pierre Beyssac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> There are a _lot_ of pitfalls to this kind of approach, as I have
> discovered using Linux Debian. This would probably open a can of
> worms you have no idea of. IMHO, the single biggest mistake in
> Debian is the all-encompassing package system whi
[ -security trimmed from Cc: ]
On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 11:11:43AM -0400, Patrick Bihan-Faou wrote:
> >pkg_delete lp
> >pkg_delete yp
> >
> >Has anyone done/tried this in the past, and if so, what was the
> > reaction? Or what do people think? I realize this sounds a bit like the
> >
Darren Reed writes:
> Well, if someone had of answered my question (to cvs-committers)
> about getting an account fixed up on freefall(?) so I could use
> cvs again, it might not have been forgotten about for quite so
> long. Maybe I sent the question to the "wrong place", but I
> received no ans
On Wed, 13 Oct 1999, Patrick Bihan-Faou wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> >It strikes me that having the base system be slightly more decomposed
> > could be advantageous. It would be great to be able to do something like:
> >
> >pkg_delete lp
> >pkg_delete yp
> >
> >Has anyone done/tried th
This for -questions, but 3.3-STABLE does so presumably current does as
well.
-Kip
On Wed, 13 Oct 1999, mariusz wrote:
> Hi
>
>What depth of FreeBSD's support for Linux applications under
>FreeBSD 4.0? I can't seem to find adequate information online.
>
Has anyone had any success using the parallel version of the Iomega Ditto
Max with current, or is there any support for it?
Douglas Kuntz
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Wed, 13 Oct 1999, Thomas Stromberg wrote:
> So my question is, what's the direction we're taking here?
The author was given commit privledges to maintain this in the tree,
obviously this was not done. Peter encouraged a KLD port, and I hope
someone steps up and makes one.
Others have eluded
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Darren Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, if someone had of answered my question (to cvs-committers)
> about getting an account fixed up on freefall(?) so I could use
> cvs again, it might not have been forgotten about for quite so
> long. Maybe I sent the q
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Thomas Stromberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For why I feel ipfilter is better then ipfw (this post was written back
> in December '98, ipfw may have changed greatly since):
>
>
>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=117538+122112+/usr/local/www/db/text/1
Hi All,
>It strikes me that having the base system be slightly more decomposed
> could be advantageous. It would be great to be able to do something like:
>
>pkg_delete lp
>pkg_delete yp
>
>Has anyone done/tried this in the past, and if so, what was the
> reaction? Or what do pe
it seems that, sans warning or UPDATE, pam is now used by k4. but the
distributed pam.conf has not been hacked to make it obvious how to make
all this work. is anyone working on this, or should i?
randy
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the b
At 4:19 PM +0200 1999/10/13, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> That is something qmail has done since the beginning.
With respect to qmail, I have no knowledge of that. I do know
that this feature was available in the first public beta of Postfix.
It was introduced early in the "alpha" stage o
Ignore that last message (for reasons which are too
damaging to go into in any great depth :-)
- mark
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
I have a P200 running -current (from about a week ago) which
announces that Pentium Pro MTRR support is enabled at boot time.
Is this something I should expect given that the machine isn't
running a Pentium Pro? :-)
- mark
Mark Newton Email: [EMAIL PROT
Brad Knowles wrote:
>
> At 2:28 PM +0200 1999/10/13, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > Nice paper! Most of the suggestions are already realized in qmail and
> > postfix.
>
> I realize that Postfix already addresses many of these issues. I
> was involved in the earlier stages of the beta testin
At 2:28 PM +0200 1999/10/13, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>> You don't know all the hacks that they made to sendmail to make
>> it perform at previously unheard of levels. ;-)
>
> Preciously unheard levels for sendmail?
No, previously unheard of levels -- period.
> Nice paper! Most o
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kenneth
Wayne Culver wrote:
>Will this solve the problem that your xmbmon seems to solve? With xmbmon I
>can look at the temps for my cpu, but with wmlmmon, it gives me the IOCTL
>error.
>
It can use both ISA interface (by opening /dev/io and banging port
0x295 a
Well, if someone had of answered my question (to cvs-committers)
about getting an account fixed up on freefall(?) so I could use
cvs again, it might not have been forgotten about for quite so
long. Maybe I sent the question to the "wrong place", but I
received no answer to even indicate that! hm
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/usr.sbin/ipnat/Attic/Makefile
1.2 Sun Oct 10 15:08:35 1999 UTC by peter
CVS Tags: HEAD
Diffs to 1.1
FILE REMOVED
Nuke the old antique copy of ipfilter from the tree. This is old
Jim Bloom wrote:
>
> I keep seeing a watchdog timeout with my 3c905B-TX every time the machine
> boots. It seems to occur after everything has been probed and /etc/rc has
> completed; around the time I get my login banner. I am running the dhcp client
> to get my IP address. I don't pound on th
Ben,
Majordomo has this facility, sending periodic reminder
messages; it is the bounces mailing list . I used it for a couple
months. The results were less than satisfactory. Most people stayed
on the bounces mailing list indefinately. ;(
jmb
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL P
Brad Knowles wrote:
>
> At 10:11 PM +0200 1999/10/12, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > They must be crazy to run a several million recipients
> > mailing list with sendmail...
>
> You don't know all the hacks that they made to sendmail to make
> it perform at previously unheard o
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Chris D.
>Faulhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>When I remove one of the CPUs and boot UP kernel on the same
>motherboard both 'chm' and 'lmmon' starts to work (also showed
>values for -5V and -12V looks strange).
P
On Wed, 13 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Additional information:
>
> When I remove one of the CPUs and boot UP kernel on the same
> motherboard both 'chm' and 'lmmon' starts to work (also showed
> values for -5V and -12V looks strange).
>
That's due to the conversion factors for th
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Chris D.
Faulhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 1999, Nickolay Dudorov wrote:
>
>> Does anybody successfully use ports/sysutils/{lmmon|chm}
>> with the Abit's BP6 motherboard ?
>>
>> After 'make install'-ing ports and adding
>>
>> controller smbu
Greg,
Actually, I used your page (or its predecessor, it looks different
now) back when I started. ;)
I'd like to do something more detailed on each type of problem.
Eventually, I'd like to turn this into a troubleshooting helper for
the most common problems. But information gathering is the f
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Chuck Robey wrote:
> I'm looking at sys/boot/common/pnp.c so I can find out how pnp is handled,
> and I found something called a COMMAND_SET, and I can't figure out what it
> means. Any takers?
COMMAND_SET is a macro which is used to build the list of commands
supported by
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Doug
>Rabson writes:
> : Due to the nature of the pnp code, it might be probed as ed1 instead of
> : ed0.
>
> I have a SBC here that has an onboard PNP ne2000 chip on it. It comes
> up as ed1 because I have ed0 at a wired
48 matches
Mail list logo
