Re: Packaging the FreeBSD base system with pkg(8)

2016-01-28 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 09:45:16AM -0800, NGie Cooper wrote: > > > On Jan 28, 2016, at 09:38, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 09:28:32AM -0800, NGie Cooper wrote: > >> > >> > >>>

Re: Packaging the FreeBSD base system with pkg(8)

2016-01-28 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 05:56:31PM +, David Chisnall wrote: > On 28 Jan 2016, at 17:45, NGie Cooper wrote: > > > > Also, consider that you're going to be allowing upgrades from older RELEASE > > versions of the OS which might be using a fixed copy of pkgng -- how are > > you going to suppo

Re: Packaging the FreeBSD base system with pkg(8)

2016-01-28 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 06:23:22PM +, Glen Barber wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 09:12:53PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > I see two hudge problem for support upgrades from older RELEASE > > versions (supported too): key (used for repo signing) change and need >

Re: Packaging the FreeBSD base system with pkg(8)

2016-01-29 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:30:25PM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > That would be like trying to install FreeBSD 11 on PDP-11 hardware. Good > luck with that, Slawa, you'll need it! :) On Pentium-IV. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lis

Re: Packaging the FreeBSD base system with pkg(8)

2016-01-29 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 01:24:53PM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Pentium-IV in 1980? I think we are talking about +35 years from now. +35 years is incorrect calculated. Only +14. > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1

Re: thread-unsafety problems as spl*() ones are NOP

2016-01-30 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 06:56:00PM +0330, mokhi wrote: > Hi. > in kbd.c there are many places spltty()/splx() used assuming it locks/unlocks. > though there is bug filed for this, and ive asked in #bsddev, Ive > preferred to ask and ensure it from here again. > As these functions are obsoleted now

Re: thread-unsafety problems as spl*() ones are NOP

2016-01-30 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 09:42:13PM +0330, mokhi wrote: > i currently only wanna do patch on kbd.c (because i'm sure there is a > thread-unsafety) > and i don't want to add anything to spltty() nor splx(), i just wanna > add things under where they've been used. > isn't problem with using mutex/spi

Re: thread-unsafety problems as spl*() ones are NOP

2016-01-30 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 09:25:21PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 09:42:13PM +0330, mokhi wrote: > > > i currently only wanna do patch on kbd.c (because i'm sure there is a > > thread-unsafety) > > and i don't want to add anything to

Re: thread-unsafety problems as spl*() ones are NOP

2016-01-31 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 10:00:51AM +0330, mokhi wrote: > @imp: > i exactly mean (Okay not so exact but very near ;D) what you said. > after analyzing kbd.c functions (eg, kbd_realloc_array()) i concluded > there are race conditions (and at result in some places there are > un-protected data too)

Re: arp flapping after udating system to 11-CURRENT.

2016-02-03 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 08:31:43AM +0100, Peter Ankerstål wrote: > Hi! > > I recently upgraded my system to 11-CURRENT (FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 > r295087: Sun Jan 31 10:21:31 CET 2016) and after that all of my other > devices in the network complains about arp-flapping: > > arp: 172.25.0.1 mov

Re: arp flapping after udating system to 11-CURRENT.

2016-02-05 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 03:43:05PM -0800, Roger Marquis wrote: > Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > >> It seems to be flapping between the virtual mac of my bridge interface > >> and the actual mac adress on the physical interface. This was not the > >> case when i r

Re: IPV6 TCP6 Slow Connect

2016-02-12 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 08:50:59PM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote: > On 2016-02-11 14:40, Larry Rosenman wrote: > > > On 2016-02-11 14:25, Kristof Provost wrote: > > > > On 11 Feb 2016, at 21:23, Larry Rosenman wrote: > > From which system(s) perspective do you want the packet captures? > > (Fir

Re: IPV6 TCP6 Slow Connect

2016-02-12 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 07:56:08AM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote: > On 2016-02-12 07:45, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 08:50:59PM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote: > > > >> On 2016-02-11 14:40, Larry Rosenman wrote: > >> > >> &g

Re: three new netmap tools: pcap player, link emulator, load distributor

2016-02-21 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:18:36AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > Hi, > I have put some new tools on the github's netmap page > https://github.com/luigirizzo/netmap in the apps/ directory > > All are under a BSD license. > > nmreplay > a fast pcap replay tool (a-la tcpreplay) with programmable ra

Re: three new netmap tools: pcap player, link emulator, load distributor

2016-02-22 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:18:36AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > lb > a packet distributor that reads from a netmap port and distributes > traffic to multiple netmap ports, using ze​ro copy and a user-defined > hash function. This will be useful e.g. for people running multiple > instances o

Re: three new netmap tools: pcap player, link emulator, load distributor

2016-02-22 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 08:17:06AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Monday, February 22, 2016, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:18:36AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > > > lb > > > a packet distributor that reads from a netmap por

Re: three new netmap tools: pcap player, link emulator, load distributor

2016-02-22 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 02:40:15PM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 08:17:06AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > > >> Give this a try and let us know. > > > > I can't co

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-03-03 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 11:54:29PM +, Glen Barber wrote: > For those who have missed the initial email surrounding this topic, we > are planning on packaging the base system with pkg(8) for 11.0-RELEASE. > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pkgbase/2016-January/00.html > > At

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-03-08 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 11:54:29PM +, Glen Barber wrote: > To obtain the sources for testing, please use the projects/release-pkg > branch: > > # svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/projects/release-pkg /usr/src > > The projects/release-pkg branch is (at this time) in sync with head > revisio

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-03-08 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 01:18:47PM +, Glen Barber wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 03:40:16PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 11:54:29PM +, Glen Barber wrote: > > > > > To obtain the sources for testing, please use the projects/

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-03-08 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 02:39:24PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Glen Barber wrote on 03/08/2016 14:18: > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 03:40:16PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > [...] > > >> Packaging of individual utilites is useless (total 19MB vs > >&

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-03-08 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:35:59PM +, David Chisnall wrote: > On 8 Mar 2016, at 15:14, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > > Yes, I undertund this. But what profit of this? Addtional size is > > small, many small packages is bad. We already have expirense with > >

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-03-10 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 03:40:16PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > About use cases. I am try to imagine different use cases and don't > found answer how do this: > > 1. package building as `make packages` witch version as timestamp of > start buildworld. I.e. on every buil

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-03-11 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 01:05:11PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:35:59PM +, David Chisnall wrote: > > On 8 Mar 2016, at 15:14, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > > > > > In terms of comparing packages, if you’re doing that visual

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-03-11 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 02:20:59PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 04:10:56PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 01:05:11PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:35:59PM +, David Chis

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-03-11 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 02:58:17PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote on 03/11/2016 14:31: > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 02:20:59PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 04:10:56PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > >

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-03-11 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 03:39:08PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > >> Anything else is on your side and even if I understand your complaints > >> (and I agree with some of them) I don't thing it will change anything on > >> the future of packaged base. > >> So it is better to spend our time on wo

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-03-11 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:01:34PM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Fri, 11 Mar 2016, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 01:05:11PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:35:59PM +, David Chisnall wrote: > >

Re: stall-free memory reads ? (possibly stale) ?

2016-04-08 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 06:24:16PM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > Hi, > I have an application with two threads sharing a memory variable, > one continuously writing, one continuously reading. > > Because of the way my system works, the reader can tolerate reading > stale data, but it should not stal

Re: 11.0-RELEASE pkg base & base.txz file

2016-04-18 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:05:12AM -0400, Nikolai Lifanov wrote: > On 04/18/16 10:00, Ernie Luzar wrote: > > 11.0 will have pkg base, thats ok, but what does than mean for the > > base.txz file? > > > > It it going to stay as part of FBSD install? > > > > I have many scripts for creating jails w

Re: 11.0-RELEASE pkg base & base.txz file

2016-04-18 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 04:16:01PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 05:14:54PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:05:12AM -0400, Nikolai Lifanov wrote: > > > > > On 04/18/16 10:00, Ernie Luzar wrote: > > > &g

Re: 11.0-RELEASE pkg base & base.txz file

2016-04-18 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 05:27:09PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 04:16:01PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 05:14:54PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:05:12AM -0400,

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-04-18 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 07:40:10PM +, Glen Barber wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:21:28PM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > > > > > On 04/18/16 12:14, Glen Barber wrote: > > >On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:01:46PM -0700, Sean Fagan wrote: > > >>On Apr 18, 2016, at 11:52 AM, Lev Serebryakov

Re: 11.0-RELEASE pkg base & base.txz file

2016-04-18 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 03:42:20PM -0400, Ernie Luzar wrote: > Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 05:27:09PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 04:16:01PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >> > >>> On

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-04-18 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 08:05:05PM +, Glen Barber wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:02:12PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > This granularity allows easy removal of things that may not be wanted > > > (such as *-debug*, *-profile*, etc.) on systems with little s

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-04-18 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:01:46PM -0700, Sean Fagan wrote: > On Apr 18, 2016, at 11:52 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > > > > I understand, that maybe it is too late, but ARE YOU KIDDING?! 755 > > packages?! WHY?! What are reasons and goals to split base in such > > enormous number of packages? >

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-04-18 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:21:28PM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > > On 04/18/16 12:14, Glen Barber wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:01:46PM -0700, Sean Fagan wrote: > >> On Apr 18, 2016, at 11:52 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > >>> I understand, that maybe it is too late, but ARE YOU KIDD

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-04-18 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:30:48PM +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote: > > > Am 18.04.2016 um 22:07 schrieb Lev Serebryakov : > > > > On 18.04.2016 22:40, Glen Barber wrote: > > > >> This granularity allows easy removal of things that may not be wanted > >> (such as *-debug*, *-profile*, etc.) on syst

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-04-18 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:43:08AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:01:46PM -0700, Sean Fagan wrote: > > > On Apr 18, 2016, at 11:52 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > > > > > > I understand, that maybe it is too late, but ARE YOU KIDD

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-04-19 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 08:17:12PM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Maybe what the "too many packages" folks need to do is write some code > to hide that it's so many packages. > > :) > > I think the rule of two feet should be applied here. > > What we have is people that have worked quite har

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-04-19 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 08:54:48AM +0100, David Chisnall wrote: > 2) People wanting to install embedded systems. Anyone who has tried > to run FreeBSD on a system with a small amount of flash storage will > have encountered the pain of having to use some kind of ad-hoc > update. Being able to ma

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-04-19 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 07:31:17AM +, Glen Barber wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 03:24:30PM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > > We've managed to keep this disease out of BSD since I started to do it in > > 1990. First we laughed/fumed at Sun's Solaris when they unbundled the > > compiler. then

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-04-19 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 08:41:29AM +, Glen Barber wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:39:11AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 07:31:17AM +, Glen Barber wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 03:24:30PM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-04-19 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:27:51PM +0200, Lars Engels wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:18:00PM +0300, dan_partelly wrote: > > > > be as terse as possible. You guys seen the "Add remove programs" > > in Windows control panel ? Thats sane. Even now the default output > > of pkg borders insane

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-04-19 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 07:27:52AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Again, the point is that those objecting should put aside the time to > implement what you (and I) are suggesting: > > > I could live with: > > > > base-utils11.1 > > - ktrace uninstalled > > - tcpdump uninstalled > > +

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-04-19 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 08:18:48AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > 1) Graciously and rapidly accept steps forward and then contribute to > them. Anything else leaves you stagnant and worse for wear. > 2) Simple over complex. > 3) If something someone else did is working for someone, then copy i

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-04-19 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 04:22:31AM +, Glen Barber wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 07:15:22AM +0300, dan_partelly wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 04:07:11 +, Glen Barber wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 06:59:38AM +0300, dan_partelly wrote: > > >> > > >> > > > >> > Sadly the tenor an

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-04-20 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:00:36PM +0300, Dan Partelly wrote: > IMO, the number of packages per-se is not a problem as long as you > can manage them without arcane commands, aliases, pipe - filters, > or scripts. (they all have their place, but less , the better) My > point is that I don't reall

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-04-20 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:43:00AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 04/20/16 10:48, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > While number of packages don't see outside internal -- this is > > irrelevant. > > After possibility of update individual package -- nuber of packa

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-04-20 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:43:08AM -0400, Paul Mather wrote: > > > Message: 20 > > Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 12:48:06 +0300 > > From: Slawa Olhovchenkov > > To: Dan Partelly > > Cc: David Chisnall , Julian Elischer > > , Nathan Whitehorn , > >

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-04-20 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:57:47AM -0400, Paul Mather wrote: > On Apr 20, 2016, at 10:54 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > >> A packaged base is just another way of describing the state of the > >> system. People on mailing lists will still be able to help people >

Re: RFC on a published change to FreeBSD 11 kqueue file ops.

2016-04-27 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:32:05AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > the following change is sitting out at github, to add kqueue support > for more file operations: > > https://github.com/dmatveev/libinotify-kqueue/blob/master/patches > > does anyone have reasons why we shouldn't import this cha

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-04-27 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 08:16:36AM -0500, Andrew Berg wrote: > Also, how much response do you expect in ~17 hours? Developers need time to > sleep, do their day jobs, and formulate a detailed response to a detailed > email. OK, week later -- no any ("interesting", "not interesting", "know issus

Re: 4.6 DRM/i915 update CFT (Sandy Bridge?)/IvyBridge/Haswell/Broadwell/SkyLake/KabyLake supported

2016-05-22 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 12:26:49AM -0700, Matthew Macy wrote: > I'm happy to announce a call for testers for the 4.6 update of drm and > i915. The driver has been successfully tested on IvyBridge, Haswell, > Broadwell and Skylake. At least basic HW 3D acceleration should work, > VGA and DP out

GOST in OPENSSL_BASE

2016-07-10 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
I am surprised lack of support GOST in openssl-base. Can be this enabled before 11.0 released? Subject: svn commit: r412619 - in head/dns: bind9-devel bind910 bind99 Author: mat Date: Wed Apr 6 13:53:09 2016 New Revision: 412619 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/412619 Log: Stop

Re: GOST in OPENSSL_BASE

2016-07-10 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 05:10:04PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On 10.07.2016 16:30, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > I am surprised lack of support GOST in openssl-base. > > Can be this enabled before 11.0 released? > > AFAIK openssl maintainers says something like they can&

Re: GOST in OPENSSL_BASE

2016-07-11 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 06:28:04PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On 10.07.2016 18:13, Andrey Chernov wrote: > > On 10.07.2016 18:12, Andrey Chernov wrote: > >> On 10.07.2016 18:01, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > >>> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 05:10:04PM +0300, Andrey

Re: GOST in OPENSSL_BASE

2016-07-11 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:04:33AM -0500, Mark Felder wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 05:29, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > > I.e. GOST will be available in openssl. > > Under BSD-like license. > > Can be this engine import in base system and enabled a

Re: GOST in OPENSSL_BASE

2016-07-11 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:28:45PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On 07/10/16 10:10 AM, Andrey Chernov wrote: > > On 10.07.2016 16:30, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > >> I am surprised lack of support GOST in openssl-base. > >> Can be this enabled before 11.0 released? > &g

Re: GOST in OPENSSL_BASE

2016-07-11 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 03:00:39PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On 07/11/16 02:41 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:28:45PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > > >> On 07/10/16 10:10 AM, Andrey Chernov wrote: > >>> On 10.07.2016 16:30, S

Re: GOST in OPENSSL_BASE

2016-07-11 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 07:48:44PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On 11.07.2016 19:29, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:04:33AM -0500, Mark Felder wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 05:29, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrot

Re: FreeBSD-11.0-BETA1-amd64-disc1.iso is too big for my 700MB CD-r

2016-07-11 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 09:41:44PM +, Glen Barber wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 03:32:34PM -0600, Alan Somers wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Ronald Klop wrote: > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> Just downloaded the amd64 BETA1 ISO (873MB) and tried to burn a CD on > > >> Windows 10. I

Re: FreeBSD-11.0-BETA1-amd64-disc1.iso is too big for my 700MB CD-r

2016-07-12 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 01:39:34PM -0700, Conrad Meyer wrote: > Maybe Tier 2 can deal with just bootonly.iso. Or your machines should > be dropped from Tier 2 if they don't support USB and we aren't okay > with dropping disc1 support for all of Tier 2. > > There's lots of aging hardware we don't

Re: FreeBSD-11.0-BETA1-amd64-disc1.iso is too big for my 700MB CD-r

2016-07-12 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 09:58:08PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: > On 12/07/2016 21:50, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 01:39:34PM -0700, Conrad Meyer wrote: > > > >> Maybe Tier 2 can deal with just bootonly.iso. Or your machines should > >&g

Re: FreeBSD-11.0-BETA1-amd64-disc1.iso is too big for my 700MB CD-r

2016-07-13 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 02:05:32PM -0700, Chris H wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 16:09:10 +0930 Shane Ambler wrote > > > On 12/07/2016 06:54, Conrad Meyer wrote: > > > DVD-R dates to 1997; cheap USB flash devices are now pervasive. Maybe > > > it's time to move on from CD. > > > > +1 on dropping

Re: (boost::)asio and kqueue problem

2016-07-19 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 07:38:09AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 05:35:59PM +0200, Hartmut Brandt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to use asio (that's boost::asio without boost) to handle > > listening sockets asynchronuosly. This appears not to work. There are als

Re: [PATCH] randomized delay in locking primitives, take 2

2016-08-01 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 02:16:59PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > Mateusz, > > just out of curiosity, have you tried to explore alternative spinlock > implementations like a ticket lock? It would be interesting to see if > there are any improvements to be gained there. Effective ticket lock i

Re: 11.0-RELEASE status update

2016-09-01 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 09:10:00PM +, Glen Barber wrote: > As some of you may be aware, a few last-minute showstoppers appeared > since 11.0-RC1 (and before RC1). > > One of the showstoppers has been fixed in 12-CURRENT, and merged to > stable/11 and releng/11.0 that affected booting from lar

Re: Heimdal in base

2016-09-15 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:07:15PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: > < > said: > > > Well, it's definitely too late for 11, now. > > > But, Debian is preparing to remove their heimdal package entirely, > > imminently: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837728 > > The primary issue

Re: Large patch/diff refuses to apply

2016-10-06 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 07:57:57AM -0600, Sean Bruno wrote: > I'm doing a large amount of change to ixgbe(4) in support of IFLIB > implementations and running into failures when trying to apply large > diffs. This is causing phabricator reviews to be unuseable as well. > > I've setup two trees t

Re: GOST in OPENSSL_BASE

2016-11-01 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:39:46PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On 07/18/16 08:12 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > Hi, > > > > +--On 11 juillet 2016 22:56:00 +0300 Slawa Olhovchenkov > > wrote: > > | On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 03:00:39PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: &g

Enabling NUMA in BIOS stop booting FreeBSD

2016-11-26 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
I am try to enable NUMA in bios and can't boot FreeBSD. Boot stoped after next messages: === Booting... KDB: debugger backends: ddb KDB: current backend: ddb === This is verbose boot. No reaction to ~^B, NMI. Same for head and 10.3-RELEASE. Hardware is Supermicro X10DRi, Dual E5-2650v4, 256GB R

Re: Enabling NUMA in BIOS stop booting FreeBSD

2016-11-26 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 05:57:47PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 12:21:24PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > I am try to enable NUMA in bios and can't boot FreeBSD. > > Boot stoped after next messages: > > > > === > > Boot

Re: Enabling NUMA in BIOS stop booting FreeBSD

2016-11-26 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 07:07:20PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 05:57:47PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 12:21:24PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > I am try to enable NUMA in bios and can't boot

Re: Enabling NUMA in BIOS stop booting FreeBSD

2016-11-26 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 09:35:08AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > It may be something to do with memory topology parsing. Maybe we need > some more debugging there to try and catch it. What debug you need? > On 26 November 2016 at 01:21, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > I am try to

Re: Enabling NUMA in BIOS stop booting FreeBSD

2016-11-26 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 09:44:49AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > The ACPI SRAT parsing code - sys/x86/acpica/srat.c . > > I'd start by enabling bootverbose - adds one echo (SLIT.Localities and > the table); adds CPU affinity info (legacy, XAPIC, ACPI) and other > locality stuff. I am use r308809

Re: Enabling NUMA in BIOS stop booting FreeBSD

2016-11-26 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 01:49:00PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Ok. So boot verbose and let's see what it says. See first message: it's already verbose boot. Yes, only 3 lines. > > On 26 November 2016 at 10:39, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at

Re: Enabling NUMA in BIOS stop booting FreeBSD

2016-11-26 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 01:55:14PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > ok, hm. then i don' know offhand, not without putting in printf debugging. :) I am not expert in this code, I am need you patches for printf debugging. > On 26 November 2016 at 13:51, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > &g

QLogic FastLinQ support

2016-12-02 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
Is support for QLogic FastLinQ QL45000 planed in FreeBSD? ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

How to load kernel module automatic?

2016-12-06 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
Now I am try to update fw in chelsio card. Firmware can't be updated if card was running (interface go to UP). I am try to unload if_cxgbe module, check module unloaded... and after short time see module loaded again! How is this possible? ___ freebsd-cur

Re: How to load kernel module automatic?

2016-12-06 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 12:50:40PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 12/06/16 12:47, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > Now I am try to update fw in chelsio card. > > Firmware can't be updated if card was running (interface go to UP). > > I am try to unload if_cxgbe mod

Re: How to load kernel module automatic?

2016-12-06 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 06:25:44AM -0800, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 02:47:15PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > Now I am try to update fw in chelsio card. > > Firmware can't be updated if card was running (interface go to UP). > > I am try

Re: How to load kernel module automatic?

2016-12-06 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 06:41:14AM -0800, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 05:34:56PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 06:25:44AM -0800, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 02:47:15PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov

Re: How to load kernel module automatic?

2016-12-06 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 06:53:03AM -0800, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 05:43:38PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 06:41:14AM -0800, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 05:34:56PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenk

Re: Enabling NUMA in BIOS stop booting FreeBSD

2016-12-11 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 05:57:47PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 12:21:24PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > I am try to enable NUMA in bios and can't boot FreeBSD. > > Boot stoped after next messages: > > > > === > > Boot

Re: Enabling NUMA in BIOS stop booting FreeBSD

2016-12-11 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 09:21:11PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 05:57:47PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 12:21:24PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > I am try to enable NUMA in bios and can't boot

Re: Enabling NUMA in BIOS stop booting FreeBSD

2016-12-11 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 09:26:56PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 10:16:26PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 09:21:11PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 05:57:47PM +0200, K

Re: Enabling NUMA in BIOS stop booting FreeBSD

2016-12-11 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 10:06:54PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 10:45:59PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 09:26:56PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 10:16:26PM +0300,

Re: Enabling NUMA in BIOS stop booting FreeBSD

2016-12-11 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 11:47:09PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 10:06:54PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 10:45:59PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 09:26:56PM +0200, Kons

Re: Enabling NUMA in BIOS stop booting FreeBSD

2016-12-11 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:15:53AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 11:47:09PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 10:06:54PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 10:45:59PM +030

Re: Enabling NUMA in BIOS stop booting FreeBSD

2016-12-11 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 01:46:21AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > > > > Can you show the verbose dmesg up to the failure point ? > > > > > > In particular, the SMAP lines should be relevant. > > > > > > > > > &g

Re: Enabling NUMA in BIOS stop booting FreeBSD

2016-12-12 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 04:54:18PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 11:47:09PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > Booting... > > ESC[01;00H8+0x8+0xe9bdc] > > KDB: debugger backends:

Re: Enabling NUMA in BIOS stop booting FreeBSD

2016-12-12 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 06:54:57PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 07:21:53PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 04:54:18PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 11:47:09PM +0300,

Re: Enabling NUMA in BIOS stop booting FreeBSD

2016-12-12 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 07:24:18PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 08:16:34PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 06:54:57PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 07:21:53PM +0300,

Re: Enabling NUMA in BIOS stop booting FreeBSD

2016-12-12 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 08:36:47PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 08:43:11PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 07:24:18PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 08:16:34PM +0300,

Re: Enabling NUMA in BIOS stop booting FreeBSD

2016-12-12 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 04:20:33PM -0600, A. Wilcox wrote: > Try the debugging patch below, which unconditionally disables import of > previous buffer. To test, you would need to boot, then frob options in > BIOS, reboot, again frob etc. > >>> > >>> still need test patch? if yes, w

Re: Enabling NUMA in BIOS stop booting FreeBSD

2016-12-13 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 01:05:35PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 02:37:14AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 04:20:33PM -0600, A. Wilcox wrote: > > > > > >>>> Try the debugging patch below, w

Re: Enabling NUMA in BIOS stop booting FreeBSD

2016-12-13 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 01:23:40PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 02:14:37PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 01:05:35PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 02:37:14AM +0300,

Re: Enabling NUMA in BIOS stop booting FreeBSD

2016-12-13 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 03:57:59PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 03:49:32PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > Boot with NUMA enabled and interleave off. > > > > Already with patched kernel > > > > > Patch kernel with

Re: Enabling NUMA in BIOS stop booting FreeBSD

2016-12-13 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 05:11:14PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 03:57:59PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 03:49:32PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > > Boot with NUMA enabled and interleave off. &

<    1   2   3   4   >