We use Supermicro here extensively and have never had a single problem
with them. We tend to combine them with Areca RAID cards which also work
well with FreeBSD.
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "Juanito Cassemiro"
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 6:10 PM
Subject: HP,
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Kargl"
Whereas switching the default back to GNU grep *guarantees*
neither unsophisticated nor sophosticated user will test
BSD grep.
It seems that you are letting a poor design decision with
respect to portmaster impair others contribution to FreeBSD.
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Thompson"
On 15 August 2010 13:55, Doug Barton wrote:
Our default grep should be significantly slower than the old grep because:
I think that new grep which is times slower than the old grep is still
in the acceptable range.
I think that new
Out of interest I tried the first test here add ack into the mix we
I've grown to like as a developer as it uses some nice sensible
defaults for every day use avoiding svn etc.
Its a pure perl app so wasn't expecting it to be particularly quick
in the single file case, its much quicker in the mul
That's a good read for other things as Mike, thanks for taking the
time to pass on this knowledge :)
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Haertel"
To:
Anyway, just FYI, here's a quick summary of where GNU grep gets
its speed. Hopefully you can carry these ideas over to BSD grep.
#1 tr
- Original Message -
From: "Olivier Smedts"
I tried it on my 8-STABLE box (root zpool v15 on 2 mirrored vdevs with
an usb l2 cache). I checked-out CURRENT sources with svn, applied the
patch (it applied cleanly). Did not modify kernel config (no
debugging) or make.conf. buildworld, bui
- Original Message -
From: "Olivier Smedts"
make installworld
That's what I wanted to do, and why I rebooted single-user on the new
kernel. But isn't the v13-v15 userland supposed to work with the v28
kernel ?
Not if you have just upgrade from 8-STABLE to Current.
Regards
Ste
Does anyone know of a nice how to guide for achieving this?
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Long"
2. Partition alignment. If you're using classic MBR slices, everything gets misaligned by 63 sectors, making it impossible for
the controller to optimize both reads and writes. If the
Is there an easy way to check which chip is present as the startup doesnt
seem to mention it?
igb0: port 0xec00-0xec1f mem
0xfade-0xfadf,0xfadc-0xfadd,0xfad9c000-0xfad9 irq 28 at device 0.0 on pci1
igb0: Using MSIX interrupts with 10 vectors
igb0: [ITHREAD]
igb0: [ITHREAD]
ink x4(x4)
I assume there is a way to convert from the hex values to the human value
but not sure what it is?
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Chadwick"
To: "Steven Hartland"
Cc: "Jack Vogel" ; "FreeBSD Net" ; "FreeBSD stabl
sysctl machdep.hlt_logical_cpus:
machdep.hlt_logical_cpus: 1
Relevant sections from dmesg:
Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #0
IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 -> irq 0
Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #1
Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #2
FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs
cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 0, ve
Original Message -
From: "John-Mark Gurney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Yes 5.X is still new tech and may not run on all machines but on the ones
> > which it does ( and it runs very well here ) basic tools are required. If
> > it doesn't run on a machine your under know false impressions, if
Thanks for the write up most appreciated. One of the more meaty differences
is that FreeBSD ZFS still has the only merged and production ready TRIM
support so my question would be are their any plans to address this before
creating the new port as going back to a world without TRIM support
wouldn’t
this over the
line, especially when people have competing priorities.
On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 at 22:52, Matthew Macy wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 14:47 Steven Hartland
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the write up most appreciated. One of the more meaty
>> differences is
On 20/12/2018 11:03, Bob Bishop wrote:
Hi,
On 19 Dec 2018, at 23:16, Matthew Macy wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 15:11 Steven Hartland
wrote:
Sorry been off for a few weeks so must have missed that, please do prod me
on again if you don’t see any response to anything not just this. Like
On of my backup drives dedicated to a ZPOOL is faulting and showing up multiple
ID. The
only working ID is id: 257822624560506537.
FreeBSD CURRENT with three ZFS disks and only 4GB of RAM is very "flaky"
regarding this
issue: today, tow times the whole poolset vanishes after a reboot. Giving th
Backup the pool and restore it is the only way I'm aware of.
- Original Message -
From: "Beeblebrox"
To:
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2014 9:57 AM
Subject: zpool frag
FRAG means fragmentation, right? Zpool fragmentation? That's news to me. If
this is real how do I fix it?
NAME
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Wemm"
On Sunday, September 21, 2014 11:06:10 AM Allan Jude wrote:
> On 2014-09-21 04:57, Beeblebrox wrote:
> > FRAG means fragmentation, right? Zpool fragmentation? That's news to me.
> > If
> > this is real how do I fix it?
> >
> > NAME SIZE AL
The only recent ATAPI change I recall is 270327, does it still occur
if you revert that?
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "Mike."
I'm starting to look at FreeBSD 11-current to see what's coming soon.
I have an older notebook that I use for test environments for
purpose
n FreeBSD-11 current
On 9/28/2014 at 5:01 PM Steven Hartland wrote:
|The only recent ATAPI change I recall is 270327, does it still occur
|if you revert that?
|
=
OK, I'll download the 11-current source.
Then revert 270327
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/cam/ata
- Original Message -
From: "Benjamin Kaduk"
To: "José Pérez Arauzo"
Cc: "FreeBSD Current"
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2014 8:54 PM
Subject: Re: What do you use for kernel debugging?
On Sun, 28 Sep 2014, José Pérez Arauzo wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to track down a (deadlock?) issue
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Wills"
To: "Andriy Gapon"
Cc: ;
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 2:27 AM
Subject: Re: zfs hang
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 08:55:26AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 08/10/2014 03:40, Steve Wills wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not sure which thread this belongs to, b
Unfortunately ZFS doesn't prevent new inflight writes until it
hits zfs_dirty_data_max, so while what your suggesting will
help, if the writes come in quick enough I would expect it to
still be able to out run the pageout.
- Original Message -
From: "Justin T. Gibbs"
To:
Cc: ; "Andriy
Hmm not sure I like this idea as it would make it more difficult to make
a copy / backup a kernel.
ATM when I want to copy a kernel for debugging its a one liner,
splitting debug symbols off to /usr/lib would prevent this.
Is there not a way to allow separate install of the debug files but to
On 30/10/2014 02:32, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 03:15:50PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote:
On 29 October 2014 12:49, Steven Hartland wrote:
Hmm not sure I like this idea as it would make it more difficult to make a
copy / backup a kernel.
ATM when I want to copy a kernel for
On 30/10/2014 08:24, O'Connor, Daniel wrote:
On 30 Oct 2014, at 13:23, Steven Hartland wrote:
Making things harder to manage vs saving a little bit of space on the
root partition really doesn't sound like a good idea; especially when
with the ZFS install, which I would suggest is be
On 30/10/2014 09:47, O'Connor, Daniel wrote:
On 30 Oct 2014, at 19:44, Steven Hartland wrote:
On 30/10/2014 08:24, O'Connor, Daniel wrote:
On 30 Oct 2014, at 13:23, Steven Hartland wrote:
Making things harder to manage vs saving a little bit of space on the
root partition real
On 30/10/2014 12:10, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On 30 Oct 2014, at 09:47 , O'Connor, Daniel wrote:
On 30 Oct 2014, at 19:44, Steven Hartland wrote:
On 30/10/2014 08:24, O'Connor, Daniel wrote:
On 30 Oct 2014, at 13:23, Steven Hartland wrote:
Making things harder to manage vs savin
On 30/10/2014 14:15, Ed Maste wrote:
On 30 October 2014 09:21, Steven Hartland wrote:
On 30/10/2014 12:10, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
(a) symbol files are for developers. Developers are clever people, often
with custom systems, they know how to deal with them as they already do
whatever they
On 30/10/2014 14:40, Ed Maste wrote:
On 30 October 2014 10:26, Steven Hartland wrote:
Yer that's the process that was in my head, if debug symbols aren't
available when savecore runs we're going to need a way to update / rerun
when they are available, or even better give it th
This is likely spikes in uma zones used by ARC.
The VM doesn't ever clean uma zones unless it hits a low memory
condition, which explains why your little script helps.
Check the output of vmstat -z to confirm.
On 04/11/2014 11:47, Dmitriy Makarov wrote:
Hi Current,
It seems like there is co
On 04/11/2014 17:22, Allan Jude wrote:
snip...
Justin Gibbs and I were helping George from Voxer look at the same issue
they are having. They had ~169GB in inact, and only ~60GB being used for
ARC.
Are there any further debugging steps we can recommend to him to help
investigate this?
The vario
On 04/11/2014 17:57, Ben Perrault wrote:
snip...
I would also be interested in any additional debugging steps and would be
willing to help test in any way I can - as I've seen the behavior a few times
as well. As recently a Sunday evening, I caught a system running with ~44GB ARC
but ~117GB
On 05/11/2014 06:15, Marcus Reid wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 06:13:44PM +, Steven Hartland wrote:
On 04/11/2014 17:22, Allan Jude wrote:
snip...
Justin Gibbs and I were helping George from Voxer look at the same issue
they are having. They had ~169GB in inact, and only ~60GB being used
On 05/11/2014 09:52, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 04/11/2014 14:55, Steven Hartland wrote:
This is likely spikes in uma zones used by ARC.
The VM doesn't ever clean uma zones unless it hits a low memory condition, which
explains why your little script helps.
Check the output of vmstat
Its usually something like stalled IO
On 16/11/2014 18:07, Steve Kargl wrote:
In init(8), one finds under DIAGNOSISTICS
"some processes would not die; ps axl advised."
So, just how is one to actually run 'ps axl advised' as
the message appears as init(8) is killing off the system?
_
Fixed, sorry forgot asr wasn't in GENERIC, so missed it in testing.
On 22/11/2014 14:34, David Wolfskill wrote:
Running:
FreeBSD g1-253.catwhisker.org 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #1434
r274790M/274790:1100047: Fri Nov 21 06:07:24 PST 2014
r...@g1-253.catwhisker.org:/common/S4/obj/us
On 04/09/2014 09:49, Borja Marcos wrote:
On Jun 30, 2014, at 8:02 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
I think these sound fine, but I've cc'd Xin Li (delphij@) who has worked with
folks at Emulex to maintain this driver. He is probably the best person to
review this.
Hi,
Seems 10.1 is on the pipeline n
On 05/12/2014 13:07, Borja Marcos wrote:
On Dec 5, 2014, at 2:00 PM, Steven Hartland wrote:
On 04/09/2014 09:49, Borja Marcos wrote:
On Jun 30, 2014, at 8:02 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
I think these sound fine, but I've cc'd Xin Li (delphij@) who has worked with
folks at Emulex t
On 02/01/2015 01:23, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi,
you need the next line of source to see that while the union only defines
Simple[1], the comparison goes up to SG_LIST (or something) which is indeed
defined as 58. Cn someone fix this? This makes i386 compiles failing
currently.
/scratch/t
On 18/01/2015 00:22, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 03:54:47PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
% cd /usr/src
% svn update
Updating '.':
At revision 277307.
% make buildworld
===> cddl/usr.sbin/dtrace (all)
cc -O2 -pipe -march=core2 -I/usr/src/cddl/usr.sbin/dtrace/../../../sys/cddl
On 18/01/2015 01:44, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 01:40:09AM +, Steven Hartland wrote:
% svn revert -r 377300:377299 .
Just double checked and I can building r277307 without issue, build box
is running 10.1-RELEASE.
My head box is quite a bit slower and is still running
On 18/01/2015 02:35, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 02:10:19AM +, Steven Hartland wrote:
On 18/01/2015 01:44, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 01:40:09AM +, Steven Hartland wrote:
% svn revert -r 377300:377299 .
Just double checked and I can building r277307
Is there anything connected to the second channel, if so what.
Was this working in a previous version and if so which one and what was
the verbose boot log from it?
On 30/03/2015 19:07, bsdml wrote:
Hello Kevin,
thanks for your clarification. Unfortunately I wasn't aware that the
T40 and *4
Verbose boot of the working OS version was what I was after, which
should provide details of what its detecting ;-)
Also a camcontrol identify of the cdrom from the working version may
also be useful
On 31/03/2015 09:54, Pietro Sammarco wrote:
Currently the cdrom drive and yes it works fine t
On 18/04/2015 17:30, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 06:34:59PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
...
- printf("LE_STATUS: %d %d %lx\n", e, rp.status, rp.le_status);
+ printf("LE_STATUS: %d %d %jx\n", e, rp.status, rp.le_status);
return 0;
}
The j modifica
4k block size on the underlying device?
On 12/05/2015 00:14, Adrian Chadd wrote:
So I'm curious - why's it faster?
-adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any
Ive literally just got this working on 10.2 after working on the code
posted on the review which you can find here:
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D4104
If you're happy running current then the patch file I linked in my comment
should apply cleanly and just work.
If you want 10.x then there's quite
Bank 5 seems to be common to all the crashes, which may suggest you have
some dodgy ram or possibly the driving CPU's memory controller.
As the error says this is a Hardware issue.
One thing we've used in the past to narrow issues like this down is to
remove as much RAM as possible and to disa
On 18/01/2016 19:08, Ed Maste wrote:
On 18 January 2016 at 03:10, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 18 Jan 2016, at 07:20, O. Hartmann wrote:
Building NanoBSD images booting off from USB Flash drives and having two GPT
partitions, booting is stuck in the UEFI loader, presenting me with something
lik
On 18/01/2016 21:57, Ed Maste wrote:
On 18 January 2016 at 15:26, Andrew Turner wrote:
the issue was we were caching reads from the first filesystem we looked
at. I've committed the fix in r294291 to force the code to re-read on
each filesystem it looks at.
Thanks Andrew - my QEMU boot failure
On 24/01/2016 12:53, Tomoaki AOKI wrote:
Unfortunately, this (and its committed successor and original for UFS)
fails to boot in some situation, like below. OTOH, gptzfsboot (and
maybe gptboot for UFS, too) is OK.
When I select Disk1 from UEFI firmware, bootx64.efi in Disk1 EFI
partition is used
On 28/01/2016 16:22, Doug Rabson wrote:
On 28 January 2016 at 15:03, Tomoaki AOKI wrote:
It's exactly the NO GOOD point. The disk where boot1 is read from
should be where loader.efi and loader.conf are first read.
I just wanted to note that gptzfsboot and zfsboot behaves this way. Boot1
look
. I built ZFS-disabled boot1.efi
> and it worked fine for USB memstick for me.
>
> *`make clean && make -DMK_ZFS=no` in sys/boot/efi/boot1 didn't disabled
>ZFS module, so I must edit the definition of *boot_modules[] in
>boot1.c. I'd have been missing somethi
I just realised an important point, does your usb disk have a UFS
root partition and your internal disk ZFS root partition?
If so then I know what the issue is, I'll have quick look now, so wait for
a diff5 to appear before testing.
On Saturday, 30 January 2016, Steven Hartland
wrote:
&g
ed
ZFS module, so I must edit the definition of *boot_modules[] in
boot1.c. I'd have been missing something.
Regards.
On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 02:58:26 +
Steven Hartland wrote:
On 28/01/2016 16:22, Doug Rabson wrote:
On 28 January 2016 at 15:03, Tomoaki AOKI wrote:
It's exa
ed
ZFS module, so I must edit the definition of *boot_modules[] in
boot1.c. I'd have been missing something.
Regards.
On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 02:58:26 +
Steven Hartland wrote:
On 28/01/2016 16:22, Doug Rabson wrote:
On 28 January 2016 at 15:03, Tomoaki AOKI wrote:
It's exa
be in conjunction with changes after r294265 in head, as
currently Diff6 doesn't apply to stable/10.
Regards.
On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 19:12:34 +
Steven Hartland wrote:
I believe, based on testing, that the from Diff 5 onwards of
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5108 this should work as you
drive] for Diff8 are done.
Regards.
On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 13:58:23 +
Steven Hartland wrote:
Thanks for doing that it was very helpful, and I know transcribing from
video would have been quite a time consuming task.
I noticed a few interesting facts:
1. It looks like when you boot fr
), 5) [USB boot] for Diff7 and 1) [single
drive] for Diff8 are done.
Regards.
On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 13:58:23 +0000
Steven Hartland wrote:
Thanks for doing that it was very helpful, and I know transcribing from
video would have been quite a time consuming task.
I noticed a few interesting facts:
1
Yep thanks, I committed this to head today, after Warner confirmed it
was good in his env too.
It will sit there for 1 week before I request permission to MFC to
stable/10.
On 05/02/2016 17:24, Tomoaki AOKI wrote:
> I got a feedback from Yuichiro NAITO at freebsd-users-jp ML.
>
> Boots fine using
isn't that 48 cores (12 real 12 virtual) per CPU?
On 22/02/2016 21:26, Ultima wrote:
This system has 24 cores (e5-2670v3)x2
Ultima
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Pieper, Jeffrey E <
jeffrey.e.pie...@intel.com> wrote:
Just out of curiosity, how many cores does your system have?
Jeff
-
So your saying "kldload zfs" fails because it can't find opensolaris or
are you giving it absolute paths?
If so try without absolute paths.
Regards
Steve
On 07/03/2016 14:09, Larry Rosenman wrote:
If I type load /boot/kernel/kernel, and then load /boot/kernel/zfs.ko,
the loader
(loade
On 14/03/2016 22:28, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 2016-03-14 17:25, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <2016031428.ga1...@borg.lerctr.org>, Larry Rosenman
writes:
And sshd is busted.
FYI: I seeing no such issues on two systems running:
11.0-CURRENT #4 r296808: Sun Mar 13 2
On 18/03/2016 17:42, Nikolai Lifanov wrote:
On 03/18/16 13:03, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2016-03-18 12:33, Guido Falsi wrote:
Hi,
I have just update one of my machines and noticed the booloaders files
got quite fat in the last few days, some by a big margin.
on an updated machine(r296993):
ls
On 18/03/2016 17:51, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/18/16 17:54, José Pérez wrote:
Hi Guido,
maybe it's because of this:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=296963
I see.
There is a problem with this though, we have howtos suggesting 64K for
the size of the freebsd-boot gpt part
vfs.zfs.min_auto_ashift is only used when a device is added so you can set it
add, then change.
On 31/03/2016 07:15, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2016-03-31 02:13, Dustin Marquess wrote:
I have what I think is a pretty normal setup.. a bunch of HDDs plus 2 SSDs
(one ZIL, one SLOG).
The HDDs are stan
On 10/04/2016 15:35, Tomoaki AOKI wrote:
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 06:59:04 -0600
Alan Somers wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Tomoaki AOKI
wrote:
Hi. Maybe freebsd-hardware list would be the right place, but it's not
so active. :-(
Is 4K quirks needed for every HDDs/SSDs having physic
On 11/04/2016 15:24, Tomoaki AOKI wrote:
Thanks for your answer!
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:15:56 +0100
Steven Hartland wrote:
On 10/04/2016 15:35, Tomoaki AOKI wrote:
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 06:59:04 -0600
Alan Somers wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Tomoaki AOKI
wrote:
Hi. Maybe
On 15/04/2016 09:11, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
avg wrote:
For what it's worth, I have been using the following SSDs since September of
2015 :
ada2: ACS-2 ATA SATA 3.x device
ada3: ACS-2 ATA SATA 3.x device
I have one in use with zfs and trim:
ada1: ACS-2 ATA SATA 3.x device
Works as my por
On 24/05/2016 21:56, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 23:54:09 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote:
On Tuesday 24 May 2016 16:17:33 you wrote:
Okay, I've got a basic idea of what may be going on. The resets that are
getting sent are triggering another probe, which then triggers a rese
What is it currently?
Just had a quick play here:
sysctl vfs.zfs.arc_max
vfs.zfs.arc_max: 32283127808
sysctl vfs.zfs.arc_max=32283127807
vfs.zfs.arc_max: 32283127808 -> 32283127807
sysctl vfs.zfs.arc_max=32283127808
vfs.zfs.arc_max: 32283127807 -> 32283127808
Error 22 = EINVAL so I suspect you'r
sing 'sysct' or sysctl.conf for vfs.zfs.arc_max
and vfs.zfs.arc_min works.
I only have problems with setting them now in loader.conf.
Like I said, I'll try to send output from my setup later.
Thanks.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Steven Hartland
mailto:ste...@multiplay.co.uk>&g
On 06/07/2016 02:25, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2016-07-05 20:27, Steven Hartland wrote:
Ahh right, let me check that.
On 06/07/2016 00:51, Nathan Bosley wrote:
I actually have this same problem.
I'll send more details when I get home later.
I think the problem started for me after r302265.
B
nk in about 4 - 5 hours I can show what values I'm using in
loader.conf under, say, r302264 and r302265 for comparison. I'm not 100%
sure that the problem arose for me in r302265; I merely suspect it.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:25 PM, Allan Jude mailto:allanj...@freebsd.org>> wrote:
On 06/07/2016 21:39, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
On 07/06/16 03:35 PM, Steven Hartland wrote:
The ARC settings and kmem aren't initialised when tunables are loaded
so the tests fail.
I've fixed this locally by blindly setting if ARC is not configured.
Request to commit the fix is with r
Just a heads-up.
Thanks again.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Steven Hartland
mailto:kill...@multiplay.co.uk>> wrote:
On 06/07/2016 21:39, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
On 07/06/16 03:35 PM, Steven Hartland wrote:
The ARC settings and kmem aren't initialised when
On 11/07/2016 23:39, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2016-07-11 18:33, Chris H wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:46:04 +0300 Slawa Olhovchenkov
wrote
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 09:41:44PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 03:32:34PM -0600, Alan Somers wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:01 P
On 12/07/2016 20:52, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 04:09:10PM +0930, Shane Ambler wrote:
+1 on dropping CD images.
I have 24U of things that don't have DVD players, including some tier-2
machines for which no upgrade is available.
Any no USB?
On 12/07/2016 21:50, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 01:39:34PM -0700, Conrad Meyer wrote:
Maybe Tier 2 can deal with just bootonly.iso. Or your machines should
be dropped from Tier 2 if they don't support USB and we aren't okay
with dropping disc1 support for all of Tier 2.
On 12/07/2016 22:20, Ed Schouten wrote:
2016-07-11 23:01 GMT+02:00 Ronald Klop :
Just downloaded the amd64 BETA1 ISO (873MB) and tried to burn a CD on
Windows 10. It complained that the ISO is too big for my 700 MB CD-r.
I remember back in the days we also had a 'miniinst' CD, which was
identic
When ever I've seen installworld issues after a full buildworld its been
clock related, so might want to check the clock on the machine is right.
On 17/07/2016 20:58, Kim Culhan wrote:
Seeing this on FreeBSD 11.0-BETA1 #0 r302963M
After make buildworld completes with no problem, then rebooted
Out of sync kernel / world?
Do you have a crash dump?
On 03/09/2016 21:50, Subbsd wrote:
Hi.
Can anybody test of output for:
zfs list
command on FreeBSD current after r305211 ? On my hosts his leads to
zfs segfault.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org
CAM already does this, doesn't really help with speed as much as you
might think though.
On 04/10/2016 19:53, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
For the whole disk destruction, hopefully one day we'd have BIO_DELETE
coalesce code, so that you can batch of lot of operations into handful SATA
commands. I've he
Hmm I'm not sure about everyone else but I we treat emX as legacy
devices (not used one in years) but igbX is very common here.
The impact of changing a nic device name is quite a bit more involved
than just rc.conf it effects other areas too, jails etc so given we can
loose access to the mach
On 15/01/2017 17:45, Pete Wright wrote:
On 1/15/17 8:22 AM, Kyle Evans wrote:
On Jan 15, 2017 10:03, "Julian Elischer" wrote:
I noticed that suddenly vim is grabbing mouse movements, which makes
life
really hard.
Was there a specific revision that brought in this change, and can it be
rem
On 07/02/2017 16:33, Toomas Soome wrote:
On 7. veebr 2017, at 18:08, Thomas Sparrevohn
wrote:
Hi all
Last week I decided to upgrade my FreeBSD installation - it's been a while
(September 16 was last time). Unfortunately CURRENT does not boot and cash
in a weird way. Both 11-RELEASE and 1
Add the following to /boot/loader.conf
Its a tunable but not a sysctl so you can't query it, you just need to
set it by adding it to /boot/loader.conf:
hw.vga.textmode="1"
On 20/03/2017 21:58, Chris H wrote:
I'm attempting to get a video card that DTRT on FreeBSD.
I started with the graphics
Is this related to kib's additional fix over the weekend?
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/320344
Regards
Steve
On 26/06/2017 09:29, O. Hartmann wrote:
Over the past week we did not update several 12-CURRENT running development
hosts, so today is the first day of performing th
- Original Message -
From: "Alexey Shuvaev"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: Panics after AHCI timeouts
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 06:19:19AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 18 October 2011 03:00, Alexey Shuvaev
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 10:14:56PM +0200
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Larabel"
I was the on that carried out the testing and know that it was on the
same system.
All of the testing, including the system tables, is fully automated.
Under FreeBSD sometimes the parsing of some component strings isn't as
nice as Linu
- Original Message -
From: "Kenneth D. Merry"
To: ;
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 8:44 PM
Subject: LSI supported mps(4) driver available
The LSI-supported version of the mps(4) driver that supports their 6Gb SAS
HBAs as well as WarpDrive controllers, is available here:
http://peop
How are you intending to use the controller?
If you're looking to put a load of disk in for say ZFS have you tried flashing to a none RAID firmware so it uses mps instead of
mfi?
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "Achim Patzner"
To:
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 1:3
Might be worth testing anyway, as that would help prove controller or driver
issue.
- Original Message -
From: "Achim Patzner"
To: "Steven Hartland"
Cc:
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 2:19 PM
Subject: Re: mfi driver performance
Am 10.09.2012 um 14:57 sch
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Sprickman"
Are you aware of anyone that will be trying this in production, and if
so, will you be able to give us list denizens any feedback on it?
Yes we've been using it in production for a few months now, but only on
single disk pools so not RAI
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Sprickman"
I have a patch against stable/8, but not stable/9:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfstrim8.patch
Are you aware of anyone that will be trying this in production, and if
so, will you be able to give us list denizens any feedback
- Original Message -
From: "Ollivier Robert"
According to Steven Hartland:
We applied the patch to a 8.3-RELEASE based install with additional patches
including patches to provide TRIM support for CAM da devices via SATA
pass-through including full support for security an
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Bishop"
To: "Pawel Jakub Dawidek"
Cc: ; ; "Steven Hartland"
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: ZFS TRIM support committed to HEAD.
Hi,
On 23 Sep 2012, at 23:25, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
I have
- Original Message -
From: "Pawel Jakub Dawidek"
Although I'm surprised your seeing that many reported failures as it should
have disabled it on a pool level after the first few failures.
Is it still increasing?
Note that 'failed' count is increasing, not the 'unsupported' count.
We
- Original Message -
From: "Ryan Stone"
Ahh yes looks like ATA supports BIO_DELETE via ATA_CFA_ERASE if the drive
announces ATA_PROTO_CFA, so I can only assume this is failing when it
shouldn't.
Might be nice to investigate what's happening and fix, but as ATA is
being replaced by CAM A
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
