Hi,
On this machine i'm running -CURRENT from around the end of april, so
apologies if this has already been corrected, however i haven't seen
anything similar reported before. Panic while writing a core file for a
program that died on signal 11. Toshiba laptop, usually perfectly stable,
resumed
When I got kernel source and built kernel,
I found error message:
===> xe
@ -> /usr/src/sys
machine -> /usr/src/sys/i386/include
awk -f @/tools/makeobjops.awk @/kern/bus_if.m -h
awk -f @/tools/makeobjops.awk @/dev/pccard/card_if.m -h
awk -f @/tools/makeobjops.awk @/kern/device_if.m -h
rm -f .depe
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 07:45:36PM +0900, Hiroyuki Une wrote:
> I found this code at line 4661 of sys/cam/scsi/scsi_low.c rev. 1.14:
>
> printf("%s(%d:%d): period(%d ns) offset(%d) width(%d) flags 0x%b\n",
> slp->sl_xname, ti->ti_id, li->li_lun,
> ti->ti_ma
On Fri, 17 May 2002, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
> Panic while writing a core file for a
> program that died on signal 11. Toshiba laptop, usually perfectly stable,
> resumed from suspend about two minutes before and was in the process of
> loading KDE... This panic has only ever happened once. there we
From: Robert Drehmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 12:52:20 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Is "%b" correct as conversion character?
>
> It is an extension to printf(9) which GCC 3.1 does not know about.
Thank you for your information.
I will wait until "%b" is implemente
Hiroyuki Une wrote:
> From: Robert Drehmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 12:52:20 +0200
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > > Is "%b" correct as conversion character?
> >
> > It is an extension to printf(9) which GCC 3.1 does not know about.
>
> Thank you for your information
I manually mount nfs fs after a reboot (current -> stable) and
if I do a "df" I got two different output. First time it get
garbled, all other times it is aligned. I'm alone?
# FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #34: Wed May 8 02:31:46 CEST 2002 [...]
# df
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsed Avail Capacity Mou
On 05/17/02 10:27, Riccardo Torrini wrote:
> I manually mount nfs fs after a reboot (current -> stable) and
> if I do a "df" I got two different output. First time it get
> garbled, all other times it is aligned. I'm alone?
>
I looked at the df code because I was intensely curious how this co
Hi,
I get this kind of panic about once a day, some days it doesn't happen,
some days it happens twice.
->
kajsa# gdb -k /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/KAJSA/kernel.debug vmcore.5
GNU gdb 4.18
Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General P
Title: Subscriber Online
If you have trouble seeing this movie click here.An eMediaPartners, Inc. Services CompanyClick Herefor the CD QualityWorld Music WebcastCheck Out OurDSL Special OfferCopyright (C) 2!
001-2002 by eMediaPartners, Inc. All rights reserved.To view this animated presentation ena
Oh, I like the netdump one ... I have a machine sitting right beside this
one that I can use to dump to ... has anyone thought to include this as a
'standard' sort of thing with FreeBSD? So that it keeps up with the
current code?
On Fri, 17 May 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
>
> There are 3 t
Marc G. Fournier writes:
>
> Oh, I like the netdump one ... I have a machine sitting right beside this
> one that I can use to dump to ... has anyone thought to include this as a
> 'standard' sort of thing with FreeBSD? So that it keeps up with the
> current code?
>
>
I plan to integr
Well, downloaded the files (a .tar.gz would be nice? *grin*) and the
client built perfectly, and kldload worked fine ... is there some way
someone can suggest of 'simulating a crash'? Some way to test to make
sure that it is working as expected? I have a 4.6-PRE machine on my desk
that I'd like
--- "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, downloaded the files (a .tar.gz would be nice? *grin*) and the
> client built perfectly, and kldload worked fine ... is there some way
> someone can suggest of 'simulating a crash'? Some way to test to make
> sure that it is working as exp
Marc G. Fournier writes:
>
> Well, downloaded the files (a .tar.gz would be nice? *grin*) and the
> client built perfectly, and kldload worked fine ... is there some way
> someone can suggest of 'simulating a crash'? Some way to test to make
> sure that it is working as expected? I have a
Ian wrote:
> On 05/17/02 10:27, Riccardo Torrini wrote:
> > I manually mount nfs fs after a reboot (current -> stable) and
> > if I do a "df" I got two different output. First time it get
> > garbled, all other times it is aligned. I'm alone?
>
> I looked at the df code because I was intensely
On 05/17/02 14:09, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Ian wrote:
>> On 05/17/02 10:27, Riccardo Torrini wrote:
>>> I manually mount nfs fs after a reboot (current -> stable) and
>>> if I do a "df" I got two different output. First time it get
>>> garbled, all other times it is aligned. I'm alone?
>>
>> I
Okay, seem to be about halfway there ... client kldload's no problem,
server runs ... do a ctl-alt-esc to get into DDB and type panic, and it
gives a message that its looking for the server and it finds it on the
right IP ... then it prints out a '1023' and finishes the panic ...
On the 'dump se
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Eric Masson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > "Warner" == Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
: Warner> H, I've found that the Intel PRO/Wireless are 5.0V devices.
: Warner> Maybe this is a different card than what I'm used to dealing
: W
I have released a new set of zero copy sockets patches, against -current
from today (May 17th, 2002).
The main change is to deal with the vfs_ioopt changes that Alan Cox made in
kern_subr.c. (They conflicted a bit with the zero copy receive code.)
The patches and the FAQ are available here:
h
* Kenneth D. Merry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020517 22:40] wrote:
>
> I have released a new set of zero copy sockets patches, against -current
> from today (May 17th, 2002).
>
> The main change is to deal with the vfs_ioopt changes that Alan Cox made in
> kern_subr.c. (They conflicted a bit with the
Hi,
I have a problem with DRM, I have ATI Xpert2000 AGP card,
in 4.5-RELEASE I used r128.ko , and all was fine, in current my kernel hangs up
saying: malloc type lacks magic number.
I have compiled the kernel with 'device agp' so what can be wrong?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 23:02:55 -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Kenneth D. Merry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020517 22:40] wrote:
> >
> > I have released a new set of zero copy sockets patches, against -current
> > from today (May 17th, 2002).
> >
> > The main change is to deal with the vfs_ioopt c
23 matches
Mail list logo
