- Original Message -
From: Hans Petter Selasky h...@bitfrost.no
To: Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org
Cc: Scott Long sco...@freebsd.org; Jeff Roberson j...@freebsd.org; ken k...@freebsd.org; freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org;
FreeBSD SCSI freebsd-s...@freebsd.org; Steven Hartland s
- Original Message -
From: Xin Li delp...@delphij.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 8/11/13 12:03 PM, Richard Yao wrote:
Is there any possibility that these quirks could be added to the
upcoming 9.2 release?
I think so but we need to act fast.
Pools composed
Could you provide the output from camcontrol identify for these
disks I want to just double check the formatting before
commiting as I don't have these disks here in labs.
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Richard Yao r...@gentoo.org
To: hack...@freebsd.org
Cc: Richard
Thanks Richard I'll commit these when I get in the office next week.
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Richard Yao r...@gentoo.org
To: hack...@freebsd.org
Cc: Richard Yao r...@gentoo.org; Eitan Adler ead...@freebsd.org
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013 1:12 PM
Subject: [PATCH]
Hi DES, unfortunately you need a quite bit more than this to work compatibly.
I've had a patch here that does just this for quite some time but there's been
some
discussion on how we want additional control over this so its not been commited.
If others are interested I've attached this as it
.
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Borja Marcos bor...@sarenet.es
On Jul 10, 2013, at 11:25 AM, Steven Hartland wrote:
If others are interested I've attached this as it achieves what we needed here
so
may also be of use for others too.
There's also a big discussion on illumos
- Original Message -
From: Xin Li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/10/13 02:02, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
The attached patch causes ZFS to base the minimum transfer size for
a new vdev on the GEOM provider's stripesize (physical sector size)
rather than
- Original Message -
From: Justin T. Gibbs
I'm sure lots of folks have some solution to this. Here is an
old version of what we use at Spectra:
http://people.freebsd.org/~gibbs/zfs_patches/zfs_auto_ashift.diff
The above patch is missing some cleanup that was motivated by my
- Original Message -
From: Justin T. Gibbs
On Jul 10, 2013, at 1:06 PM, Steven Hartland wrote:
- Original Message - From: Justin T. Gibbs
I'm sure lots of folks have some solution to this. Here is an
old version of what we use at Spectra:
http://people.freebsd.org/~gibbs
- Original Message -
From: Justin T. Gibbs
...
One issue I did spot in your patch is that you currently expose
zfs_max_auto_ashift as a sysctl but don't clamp its value which would
cause problems should a user configure values 13.
I would expect the zio pipeline to simply insert an
I just remembered I had an issue with aicasm when compiling our kernel that
didn't
have ahc or ahd on an 8.3 box. The fix was to manually delete the kernel obj
directory before compiling after doing a full make buildworld.
For some reason there was some cruft left in there that running make
- Original Message -
From: Dimitry Andric dimi...@andric.com
On 2013-05-02 09:47, Steven Hartland wrote:
I just remembered I had an issue with aicasm when compiling our kernel that
didn't
have ahc or ahd on an 8.3 box. The fix was to manually delete the kernel obj
directory before
- Original Message -
From: Dimitry Andric dimi...@andric.com
On 2013-05-02 11:54, Steven Hartland wrote:
From: Dimitry Andric dimi...@andric.com
...
Well, a way to reproduce the problem would be nice. I tried running
make buildkernel in a stable/9 tree on a 10.0 machine
I don't believe aicasm is actually needed if you don't have a driver
which requires e.g. ahd or ahc. It would be good to get that fixed too.
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Alfred Perlstein bri...@mu.org
To: hack...@freebsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 5:46 PM
- Original Message -
From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com
To: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; ali mousa ali_mousa...@yahoo.com
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 11:06 PM
Subject: Re: Does any body agree ?
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 3:03 PM,
- Original Message -
From: Daniel O'Connor
On 21/02/2013, at 9:06, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote:
If I change the console redirect to com1, my screen stays blank. Would
you perhaps know how to use com1 for redirect and connect to it using
ipmi-console (or ipmi-tool
- Original Message -
From: Paul Schenkeveld free...@psconsult.nl
To: Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.au
Cc: hack...@freebsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 8:31 PM
Subject: IPMI console [Re: Chicken and egg, encrypted root FS on remote server]
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, Feb 20,
- Original Message -
From: John Baldwin
Thanks for the feedback John appreciated, a couple of questions inline
below if you would be so kind.
On Sunday, February 17, 2013 1:06:40 pm Steven Hartland wrote:
Hi all I'm looking for someone to review the attached patch
to mfiutil which
Hi all I'm looking for someone to review the attached patch
to mfiutil which adds foreign disk support to mfiutil as
per:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=172091
Any and all feedback welcome :)
Regards
Steve
This e.mail is
Looking at the cam ata code I can't see how those values would do
anything after booting.
I suspect they should be loader only tunables with the current code
and cant be changed on the fly for a disk that's already been
registered.
Try setting the values in /boot/loader.conf if you haven't
work, so you might
want to raise a PR about it.
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Steven Hartland
Looking at the cam ata code I can't see how those values would do
anything after booting.
I suspect they should be loader only tunables with the current code
and cant be changed
- Original Message -
From: Devin Teske devin.te...@fisglobal.com
You're the perfect person to help us figure out why when we:
1. back-port mfi(4) from stable/8 into releng/8.3 (8.3-RELEASE-p5 at the time
of back-port)
2. Succeed in getting 8.3 to boot on Thunderbolt card
3. mfiutil
- Original Message -
From: dte...@freebsd.org
But I bet you're not sitting 88 units of Thunderbolt cards that don't work in
8.3.
8.3 is also exhibiting major problems with the igb-based NICs on those same 88
units.
Only effects igb init but might want to make sure you have r245334
- Original Message -
From: dte...@freebsd.org
To: 'Ian Lepore' free...@damnhippie.dyndns.org
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; dte...@freebsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 12:56 AM
Subject: RE: kgzip(1) is broken
-Original Message-
From: Ian Lepore
- Original Message -
From: Karl Pielorz kpielorz_...@tdx.co.uk
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 11:12 AM
Subject: Threaded 6.4 code compiled under 9.0 uses a lot more memory?..
Hi All,
Can anyone think of any quick pointers as to why some code
We encountered a problem receiving a full ZFS stream from
a disk we had backed up. The problem was the receive was
aborting due to quota being exceeded so I did some digging
around and found that Oracle ZFS now has -x and -o options
as documented here:-
Did you get anywhere with this?
Seeing a similar thing on some new Patsburg based machines with
KINGSTON SSD's on 8.3-RELEASE.
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Caza, Aaron aaron.c...@ca.weatherford.com
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 9:58
if
the problem stays with the disk or the port.
Here's hoping its the disk or the cable and not the
controller.
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Caza, Aaron aaron.c...@ca.weatherford.com
To: Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk; freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Sent: Friday, July
- Original Message -
From: Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org
on 26/07/2012 01:08 Alexander Motin said the following:
Different controllers have different command queueing limitations. If you are
testing with ahci(4) driver and modern disks, then their 32 command slots per
port can be
When running dtrace looking at syscall::write:return for a java
app with a ustack call for the first few calls I get:-
dtrace: ERROR: gelf_getehdr() failed: No error: 0
And then after a number dtrace crashes:-
#0 0x000800fcc59d in _malloc_prefork () from /lib/libc.so.7
[New
As a first foray into dtrace I wanted to create a little
script which shows the amount of disk read / write activity.
Now the DtraceToolkit includes rwsnoop but this uses Solaris
specific requests and on looking around it seems like
using rwsnoop vn_fullpath may be the way to go.
Has anyone
- Original Message -
From: Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
On 2012-May-18 22:54:43 +0200, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
Be sure to use -t enable when creating the filesystem:
Only if your SSD supports TRIM. Some consumer-grade SSDs don't and
get very
- Original Message -
From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
My opinion is that most important obstacle in front of FreeBSD is its
installation structure :
It is NOT possible to install and use a FreeBSD distribution directly as it
is .
I disagree, we find quite the opposite; FreeBSD's current
- Original Message -
From: Alex Goncharov alex-goncha...@comcast.net
About a week ago, I made a jump and upgraded the system's FreeBSD from
version 8 to 9. Everything is great (I am typing this message on that
machine now) but the boot pause after the (looking new in 9) boot menu
is
- Original Message -
From: John Kozubik j...@kozubik.com
It's amazing how many people are in the exact same boats - waiting for
8.3, getting locked out of new motherboards because em(4) can't be
backported to even the production release...
This is not true, only last week did we
- Original Message -
From: Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net
On Tuesday 17 January 2012 20:54:51 Steven Hartland wrote:
boot time fixes (disable memtest),
Hi,
Another noticeable part is that ufsread.c in boot2 uses very small block sizes
to read the file system data
- Original Message -
From: John Kozubik j...@kozubik.com
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 10:28 PM
Subject: FreeBSD has serious problems with focus, longevity, and lifecycle
Friends,
I was disappointed to see that 8.3-RELEASE is now slated to come out
- Original Message -
From: Jason Hellenthal jh...@dataix.net
Just to put some visuals to this...
.
`-- DIE
|-- Core1 [Idle]
|-- Core2 [35% ]
| `-- thread127
|-- Core3 [40% ]
| `-- thread127
`-- Core4 [100%]
`-- thread127
In this case you would say the
- Original Message -
From: Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org
Totalling up RSS from ps axo rss gives a total in the region of that if
the vm stats are out by a factor of 4, in this case it should be: 8132557
which is 7.75GB a much more realistic value.
Am I totally missing something or is
- Original Message -
From: Jason Hellenthal jh...@dataix.net
This goes along with the thoughts I had about 4 months ago tending to some
zfs statistics as well top showing greater than 100% actual CPU usage. This
is a big pet peave of mine. Its like saying you ate 134% of a bannanna
- Original Message -
From: Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd
I could understand a bit of overflow as stats are snapshots which may not
be instuntanious, but 31GB instead of under 8GB is hardly a rounding
issue /
overflow.
With respect to top showing greater than 100% by how much are you
- Original Message -
From: RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 1:58 PM
Subject: Re: Invalid memory stats from vmstat and sysctl vm.vmtotal?
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 12:39:10 -
Steven Hartland wrote:
We're seeing some
We're seeing some impossible memory usage stats reported on machines
here from vmstat and sysctl vm.vmtotal.
We have machines reporting to be using 31GB total when they only have
8GB physical and are not using any swap.
Here's an output from one of our machines:-
vmstat -c 2 -w 1 -n 0
procs
top and then use the IO mode, will give you an idea where the issue is.
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 9:34 PM
Subject: iotop (dtrace?)
I've got two systems with a
- Original Message -
From: Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org
Thats interesting, are you using http as an example or is that something thats
been gleaned from the debugging of our output? I ask as there's only one process
running in each of our jails and thats a single java process.
It's
- Original Message -
From: Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org
Probably I have mistakenly assumed that the 'prison' in prison_derefer() has
something to do with an actual jail, while it could have been just prison0 where
all non-jailed processes belong.
That makes sense as this particular
- Original Message -
From: Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org
Thanks to the debug that Steven provided and to the help that I received from
Kostik, I think that now I understand the basic mechanics of this panic, but,
unfortunately, not the details of its root cause.
It seems like
Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:02:19AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
So I suspect that this is what's happening resulting in an extremely
small timeout instead of a large one. Now I know that passed in value
to the timeout is seconds * 1000 so we should be seeing 2148000
for ccb-ccb_h.timeout now
I'm working on adding security methods to camcontrol and have
come up against a strange issue. It seems that the timeout
value for cam, at least on ata (ahci), is limited to less than
2148 seconds.
This can be seen by running:-
camcontrol identify ada0 -t 2148 -v
(pass0:ahcich0:0:0:0):
- Original Message -
From: Matthias Andree matthias.and...@gmx.de
No I'm not its replying to the sender.
Yes you are, check your trace: The sendto address and port are the same
as the bound address.
This is a bug in truss it seems, Bjoern said he's gonna have a look at
it. Doesn't
- Original Message -
From: Matthias Andree matthias.and...@gmx.de
I'm adding back in -java as based on you comments it may well be
something in the jdk passing invalid values down to the kernel
syscall.
The socket bind works fine and the packets sent to the server arrive
and are
We're trying to get our machines IPv6 enabled but in doing so this
seems to break java apps using openjdk6 for UDP sends.
The server seems quite happy to send and receive TCP packets on
IPv6 socket that are bound to IPv4 addresses, but the same is not
true for UDP.
The socket bind works fine
While I can understand some may want its not something we use on any of
our machines, and I suspect that's the case for many others.
Given adding it means the kernel will be doing extra work and hence a
drop in performance for a feature most will never use, I'm guessing here,
I would say just
- Original Message -
From: Garrett Cooper gcoo...@freebsd.org
As a followup to this and based on discussions with other folks,
the fact that it's using hlt to halt CPUs without rescheduling tasks /
masking interrupts, etc is not good. So none of the *hlt* sysctls are
really doing the
I'm trying to debug a possibly failing CPU, so I thought it would
be easy just disable the cores using machdep.hlt_cpus and see if
we see the panic's we've been seeing.
The problem is it seems ULE doesnt properly support machdep.hlt_cpus
and still schedules processes onto the halted cpus which
- Original Message -
From: Gary Jennejohn gljennj...@googlemail.com
Looking at the kernel source it appears that only sched_4bsd.c makes use
of hlt_cpus_mask.
Given ULE is default do these need to be either removed totally or at least
conditionally based on the scheduler choice as
For reference I've found that an alternative is to set the following
in loader.conf:-
hint.lapic.2.disabled=1
hint.lapic.3.disabled=1
2 and 3 here are the apic numbers displayed by dmesg on boot for the
cpu's
Obviously this requires a reboot so no perfect for all uses but it does
work for what
As you may have guessed by my last reply no we didn't we had to revert to
apache + passenger, but seems you've found a fix anyway. Out of interest
what lead you to the close race condition PR as a potential fix?
- Original Message -
From: Matt Reimer mattjrei...@gmail.com
Steve,
Did
Thanks Matt most appreciated!
- Original Message -
From: Matt Reimer mattjrei...@gmail.com
Steve,
The patch for PR 144061 works for us.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2010-February/030741.html
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144061
Ok so I'm looking to replace our current windows mail
server using mdaemon with a FreeBSD solution, having
looked around there seems to be differing opinions
of which is the best option to go with between sendmail
and postfix.
The problem with looking for info on this is that a
lot of the high
- Original Message -
From: Bill Moran wmo...@collaborativefusion.com
I recommend squirrelmail. Unless you require some obscene feature-rich
craziness (in that case, have fun installing IMP). I've used it with
Postfix/Dovecot for a few years now with no trouble.
Why is this
- Original Message -
From: Alexander Nesterov nester@gmail.com
On 08.01.2010 20:21, Steven Hartland wrote:
[..]
12582/218/12800/12800 4k (page size) jumbo clusters in use
(current/cache/total/max)
Try to increase jumbo clusters (sysctl kern.ipc.nmbjumbop)
Thanks
The first time in a while be we just had nginx get stuck in the zoneli
state:
51630 www 1 -160 16616K 9396K zoneli 2 24:33 0.00% nginx
51627 www 1 -160 16616K 9376K zoneli 1 24:22 0.00% nginx
51629 www 1 -160 16616K 9372K zoneli 3 24:09 0.00% nginx
- Original Message -
From: John Baldwin
I've uploaded a two more traces for the oxt test failure / segv.
http://code.google.com/p/phusion-passenger/issues/detail?id=441#c1
From looking at the test case it testing the capture of failures and its
ability
to create a stack trace output
We're having an issue with Passenger on FreeBSD where it will hang
and stop processing any more requests the details are attach to
the following bug report:
http://code.google.com/p/phusion-passenger/issues/detail?id=318#c14
In addition the test suite crashes in what seems to be a very
basic
- Original Message -
From: John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org
For the hang it seems you have a thread waiting in a blocking read(), a thread
waiting in a blocking accept(), and lots of threads creating condition
variables. However, the pthread_cond_init() in libpthread (libthr on FreeBSD)
- Original Message -
From: Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com
To: Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: nginx + passenger = segv in _rtld_error on restart
I'm currently testing nginx + passenger on FreeBSD 8.0 and I'm seeing a strange
segv which seems to indicate a core library error in _rtld_error. Could this
be the case or is the stack just badly corrupted?
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0008005577dc in _rtld_error () from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1
#1
Yes I can confirm that.
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Thierry Herbelot thierry.herbe...@free.fr
from the two URLs you provide, it seems that i386 is working (for all FreeBSD
versions) and only amd64 is failing : can you confirm this ?
I've just been trying to get a 32bit binary to work on amd64 7.0-RELEASE,
the binary had some qt4 dependencies so I set about copying these into
/usr/local/lib32 but it seems that for some reason /usr/local/lib is
searched first which obviously causes problems when here is a 64bit
library of the
Did anyone ever get anywhere with this, just retried with 8.0-BETA2
and still the same hangs as depicted in the attached screen shots.
Sorry got no serial console :(
Would like to get this working if possible so anything I can try
to gain some more info on this issue?
Regards
Steve
-
I'm trying to convert some audio streams and the only app
which seems to be capable of this mplayer with the w32codecs
Unfortunately the machine is 7.1 amd64. I've compiled the
binaries up on an old i386 box but when running said bins
on the amd64 box it errors with:
Opening audio decoder:
- Original Message -
From: Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=233316+0+archive/2008/freebsd-amd64/20081214.freebsd-amd64
The latest version I can find is:
http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/amd64_ldt-pre.4.patch
Anyone info appreciated.
- Original Message -
From: Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com
Thanks for the confirmation Kostik. Do you believe there is any reason to
stop that patch working on 7.X if manually applied? Is the patch above the
final version that went into HEAD?
No and no, but I think that
Hi guys I'm looking for someone to commit the hptmv v1.16
driver to the main source? Currently this driver in FreeBSD
core is at 1.12 which it totally unusable under 7.+, panics
on install, as well as being totally unstable on Seagate
drives on previous versions.
I can provide a full patch which
0n Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 10:53:06PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
You can increase the maximum amount of PTYs by editing a lot of source
files on your system. There is some good news: in -CURRENT we switched
to Unix98-style PTYs (/dev/pts/%u). Right now the maximum amount of PTYs
is limited to 1000
Yep that's what I came up with after looking though the code thanks
for the link though, always good to get confirmation that I didn't
miss something.
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 1:55:12 pm Steven Hartland
How can I increase the maximum number or ptys available on FreeBSD 7.0?
It seems that currently the machine is maxing out at 512 but there is
still loads of capacity left on the machine.
Ideally would like to double at least the number of ttys available,
any help would be most appreciated.
: Steven Hartland
How can I increase the maximum number or ptys available on FreeBSD 7.0?
It seems that currently the machine is maxing out at 512 but there is
still loads of capacity left on the machine.
Ideally would like to double at least the number of ttys available,
any help would be most
Just had one of hour webservers flag as down here and on
investigation the machine seems to be struggling due to
a hung vmdaemon process.
top is reporting vmdaemon as using a constant 55.57% CPU
yet CPU time is not increasing:-
last pid: 36492; load averages: 0.04, 0.05, .11 up
Did you have any ideas where the root of this problem may lie Kostik?
- Original Message -
From: Steven Hartland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes every time, I've got a half life 2 dedicated install mounted under unionfs:-
mount -t unionfs -o noatime -o below /usr/local/games/hl2ds
/usr/local
Not sure where to go with this one any help appreciated:-
FreeBSD dedicated11.multiplay.co.uk 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #4: Tue Dec 2 16:53:30 UTC 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MULTIPLAY i386
kgdb kernel /var/crash/vmcore.1
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright 2004
and unionfs interaction which is causing the
issue.
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Kostik Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Steven Hartland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 8:39 PM
Subject: Re: unionfs kernel panic on 7.1-PRERELEASE
Thanks Rudi, would really like to get is sorted as they would make
ideal app servers.
- Original Message -
From: Rudi Kramer - MWEB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Steven,
We recently purchased a few M600's but haven't got around to loading
FBSD on them, we should start installing next week
I've been trying to install FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE amd64 on
a Dell M600 Blade but it hangs just after initialising
the isa bus.
I've tried a number of things and the only thing that I
can get to work is the i386 build which boots into the
installer without issue.
Has anyone had any experience
We're using lighttpd here for a new project and we're having issues
where by it simply stops processing after a 1-2 days.
Having looked at it in some detail this morning it seems that
the kernel is resetting the connection without notifying the
lighttpd process there is a new connection attempt.
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you change the polling method in lighttpd to use poll or select
instead of kqueue? This would help in determining if the problem is
with the daemon itself or the kevent system.
Yep already scheduled that change for
- Original Message -
From: Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The connections getting reset without application notification is a classic
symptom of a full listen queue. A couple of questions:
Yep thats what I thought.
(1) What FreeBSD version?
7.0-RELEASE-p2 (amd64)
(2) Are you
I assume as it would effect the entire machine and hence should be run
on the base machine instead, not the jail?
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anybody know why ntpd might not work in a jail?
This e.mail is private
sendmsg is not documented as ever returning EINVAL but yet when
using the following code to send credentials to a remote host
results in EINVAL from sendmsg.
I suspect that SCM_CREDS is only valid for PF_LOCAL / PF_UNIX
sockets and not PF_INET sockets and hence the code in dbus
is actually
The following works fine here note its MODULE'S' not MODULE
makeoptions MODULES_OVERRIDE=linux linprocfs acpi nfsclient nfsserver nullfs
accf_http
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Danny Braniss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Sent: Monday, March 31,
Seems if you have package X which depends on package Y which
depends on package Z then pkg_add -r X will always fail unless
you first :-
1. pkg_add -r Y
2. pkg_add -r Z
The failure will be:-
pkg_add: could not find package Z !
This happens even though Z exists in the remote source package
- Original Message -
From: walt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you are using RELENG_7, pkg_add is looking in the wrong place
on the remote server for packages. I just submitted a patch on
the -STABLE list for this problem.
I'm actually using PACKAGESITE which is meant to bypass all path
- Original Message -
From: Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The other thing that bothers me is, that under freebsd is quite easy to get:
[send_ip] sendto: No buffer space available
It happens almost always on my laptop just few seconds after I start
hping with timecounter=TSC
I'm not sure,
Is it possible to create a jail with more than one IP?
What I'm looking to do is have a forward facing IP and
an backwards facing IP in the same jail so it can
talk to the internet and our back door systems.
Looking around this doesn't seem possible but is it?
Regards
Steve
Any one got any pointers on this, the machine we running this app on is over
90% idle so I really don't want to have to install a second machine just to
workaround a limit on the number of pty's, surely there's a way to increase
this?
Regards
Steve
Thanks for the tip there but I cant find any function called pty_create_slave
in the source.
N.B. Machine is running 5.4 but I also looked on 6.2 which we could upgrade
to but still couldn't find it, so I assume you may be talking about something
that's in current which we couldn't risk on this
Is it really a matter of editing:
/usr/src/sys/kern/tty_pty.c
And changing:
static char *names = pqrsPQRS;
To increase the number of available pty's ( FreeBSD 5.4 ) or is there
a nicer way?
Regards
Steve
This e.mail is private and
Well looked like that might work but clearly not, should have looked closer.
Is there a way to do this?
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
Is it really a matter of editing:
/usr/src/sys/kern/tty_pty.c
And changing:
static char *names = pqrsPQRS;
To increase the number of
When trying to trace an app with truss -f to trace descendants the application
will always hang. Without -f everything is fine but we dont get the decendants
calls.
This is when running on FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p7, the application in this test
is a linux app and we are running linux_base-fc-4_9.
1 - 100 of 265 matches
Mail list logo
