Hi list, I was reading the handbook for the -STABLE branch, but no answer,
the actual realeases are -CURRENT and -PRODUCTION; I don't see any -STABLE
on site, I should assume that -PRODUCTION is the stable branch ??? Am I
wrong ???
___
В сообщении от Суббота 18 ноября 2006 10:38 Parv написал(a):
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Bachilo Dmitry thusly...
FreeBSD is not Linux, FreeBSD is UNIX.
Close but not quite. FreeBSD is Unix not UNIX; difference is in the
money to be paid to be certified as all capitals.
...
I have a Edimax EW-7108PCg that works great under Linux: (
http://www.zipzoomfly.com/jsp/ProductDetail.jsp?ProductCode=253490prodlist=nextag)
The reason it works great is because Edimax is great at giving documentation
to developers to write drivers for it. I found this for OpenBSD:
On 11/15/06, Ne'Bahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my conf looks like:
HorizSync31.5, 35.15, 35.5
VertRefresh50-70
Section Device
IdentifierStandard VGA
VendorNameUnknown
BoardName Unknown
Drivervga
Section Screen
...
DefaultDepth24
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Bachilo Dmitry thusly...
FreeBSD is not Linux, FreeBSD is UNIX.
Close but not quite. FreeBSD is Unix not UNIX; difference is in the
money to be paid to be certified as all capitals.
... Unless you were going for the emphasis. :)
- Parv
--
On 11/17/06, Ne'Bahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list, I was reading the handbook for the -STABLE
branch, but no answer, the actual realeases are
-CURRENT and -PRODUCTION; I don't see any -STABLE
on site, I should assume that -PRODUCTION is the
stable branch ??? Am I wrong ???
Dear FreeBSD,
I have no idea how this has happened, but somehow I have been put on
your mailing lists.
I do not use your products or service and it has no application for me.
I would appreciate it if you would remove me from your mailing list.
Sincerely,
--
Tim Thompson
ClydeSight
Michael L. Squires wrote:
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Felix 'buebo' Kakrow wrote:
Hello List,
I tried gvinum RAID-5 with a 5-Stable around the time when 5.1 or 5.2
was released (afair) and back then it basically sucked big time. Raid
worked as long as nothing failed, but reconstructing a drive was
Hello guys,
I want to know if Dell PowerEdge 1950 works fine on FreeBSD 6.1 i386.
(I am interested if network cards are detected and work properly, also
if SATA/SAS drive is detected properly.
best regards
ovidiu
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Clyde's Human Unit wrote:
Dear FreeBSD,
I have no idea how this has happened, but somehow I have been put on
your mailing lists.
I do not use your products or service and it has no application for me.
I would appreciate it if you would remove me from your mailing list.
Sincerely,
Uh
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 09:42:26 +0100, Clyde's Human Unit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear FreeBSD,
I have no idea how this has happened, but somehow I have been put on
your mailing lists.
I do not use your products or service and it has no application for me.
I would appreciate it if you
while i use sendmail for many years and many of my users have outlook
express (it's their problem not mine, there are lot of normal mail clients
available for windows) and all works.
recently i installed sendmail as one of server programs when configuring
machine for someone (standard
PS. sending mail through sqwebmail works fine too whatever WWW browser is
used.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 07:46:39 -0500
Ne'Bahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list, I was reading the handbook for the -STABLE branch, but no answer,
the actual realeases are -CURRENT and -PRODUCTION; I don't see any -STABLE
on site, I should assume that -PRODUCTION is the stable branch ??? Am I
On Saturday November 18, 2006 at 07:02:32 (AM) gb wrote:
Clyde's Human Unit wrote:
Dear FreeBSD,
I have no idea how this has happened, but somehow I have been put on
your mailing lists.
I do not use your products or service and it has no application for me.
I would appreciate it
On Saturday November 18, 2006 at 07:26:38 (AM) Wojciech Puchar wrote:
while i use sendmail for many years and many of my users have outlook
express (it's their problem not mine, there are lot of normal mail clients
available for windows) and all works.
recently i installed sendmail as
hi all:
trying to install package freeradius and it is using
package openldap-client-2.3.29. but i have problems
to get openldap-client-2.3.29 installed:
=== openldap-client-2.3.29 conflicts with installed
package(s):
openldap-client-2.2.30
They install files into the same place.
Hello,
I usually use cvsup5.us.freebsd.org. but it has not given me any new
bits for several days now. And if I use ANY other server what usually
takes five minutes, takes 30-minutes to an hour (or they just hang).
Which is terribly annoying.
I've tried picking other servers by hand, and
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 06:21:27 -0800 (PST)
gahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all:
trying to install package freeradius and it is using
package openldap-client-2.3.29. but i have problems
to get openldap-client-2.3.29 installed:
=== openldap-client-2.3.29 conflicts with installed
Hello,
I `ve got a question about freebsd 6.1.
I try to install 6.1 on a celeron 1300 but it will not install.
When i try to install freebsd 5.5 on the same machine i don`1t have any
trouble.
What could be the reason?
Thanks in advance,
Justin.
I am running a DNS server in a jail and have setup a devfs mount in the
jail to have null and random devices.
The setup works fine, but once I log out then log back in the pty and
tty devices of my login get created in the jail. Which, of course, I
don't want to happen. To clarify, I'm not
I `ve got a question about freebsd 6.1.
I try to install 6.1 on a celeron 1300 but it will not install.
When i try to install freebsd 5.5 on the same machine i don`1t have any
trouble.
What could be the reason?
Any additional information such as how are you trying to install (CD?
FTP?),
At 07:13 AM 11/18/2006, Andreas Rudisch wrote:
I would appreciate it if you would remove me from your mailing list.
Read the last line on _any_ email on this list.
Aww c'mon guys! He asked very nicely, and he's obviously a
non-techie. I sent an un-sub for him; hopefully he can handle
--On November 18, 2006 11:57:34 AM +0200 ovidiu ene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello guys,
I want to know if Dell PowerEdge 1950 works fine on FreeBSD 6.1 i386.
(I am interested if network cards are detected and work properly, also
if SATA/SAS drive is detected properly.
There are two problems
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 10:08:03 -0600
Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On November 18, 2006 11:57:34 AM +0200 ovidiu ene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello guys,
I want to know if Dell PowerEdge 1950 works fine on FreeBSD 6.1 i386.
(I am interested if network cards are detected and
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 08:25:57AM -0600, Eric Schuele wrote:
Hello,
I usually use cvsup5.us.freebsd.org. but it has not given me any new
bits for several days now. And if I use ANY other server what usually
takes five minutes, takes 30-minutes to an hour (or they just hang).
Which is
phpsysinfo 2.5.2-rc2 is broken with php-5.2.0 (and rc3 has error messages even
tho its basically functionsal). i have no programming stills to even try to
offer a fix, and am now searching for some sort of other means to get the
information that phpsysinfo offers. can anyone recommend an
Stocks Quotes in attachement
Space Special Report Blogsmy my Voice!
Only a is being treated by.
Fair Sonepur Bihar Shop or Gift xda.
Articles Archives Editorial Letters to Editor in Sunday!
Horoscope Aries Taurus Gemini Cancer leo a Virgo.
More Tata Steel runs into Brazilian
Eric Schuele [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I usually use cvsup5.us.freebsd.org. but it has not given me any new
bits for several days now. And if I use ANY other server what usually
takes five minutes, takes 30-minutes to an hour (or they just
hang). Which is terribly annoying.
I've tried
Clyde's Human Unit skrev:
It's all in the headers, read them!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello
On a freshly installed FreeBSD System, what step should be taken first?
Kernel should be Rebuilded FIRST or cvsup should be Run FIRST?
--
Thanks!
BR / vj
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
his network has separate machine (still running linux now) designed for
traffic control. but traffic control rules are not port-based, and for
sendmail server there are no control just routing.
can linux make such problems? i don't think so as FTP goes fine, but just
asking.
Where are your log
VeeJay wrote:
Hello
On a freshly installed FreeBSD System, what step should be taken first?
Kernel should be Rebuilded FIRST or cvsup should be Run FIRST?
If you want to update your system (base, not ports), you first have to
run cvsup and then make buildworld, kernel etc
If you
--On November 18, 2006 6:46:56 PM +0100 VeeJay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
On a freshly installed FreeBSD System, what step should be taken first?
Kernel should be Rebuilded FIRST or cvsup should be Run FIRST?
It won't do you any good to rebuild the kernel unless you first cvsup
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Eric Schuele [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I usually use cvsup5.us.freebsd.org. but it has not given me any new
bits for several days now. And if I use ANY other server what usually
takes five minutes, takes 30-minutes to an hour (or they just
hang). Which is terribly
Quoting VeeJay [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello
On a freshly installed FreeBSD System, what step should be taken first?
Kernel should be Rebuilded FIRST or cvsup should be Run FIRST?
--
Thanks!
BR / vj
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
On 11/18/06, VeeJay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
On a freshly installed FreeBSD System, what step should be taken first?
Kernel should be Rebuilded FIRST or cvsup should be Run FIRST?
None if you don't want to update it. OTOH, if you want
to do that, you should update the sources
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 06:46:56PM +0100, VeeJay wrote:
Kernel should be Rebuilded FIRST or cvsup should be Run FIRST?
Most people do not need a custom Kernel, just some modules added at runtime.
On What part of source do you intend to run cvsup?
New Kernel should be run in order to
IMPORTANT INFORMATION!
This is an automated message.
The message you sent (attached below) requires confirmation
before it can be delivered. To confirm that you sent the
message below, just hit the Reply button and send this
message back (you don't need to edit anything). Once this is
done,
cvsup to get the latest security updates, then do your rebuilds.
At 11:46 AM 11/18/2006, VeeJay wrote:
Hello
On a freshly installed FreeBSD System, what step should be taken first?
Kernel should be Rebuilded FIRST or cvsup should be Run FIRST?
--
Thanks!
BR / vj
Hallo,
Recently updated to 6.2RC1 and upon reboot GELI is now asking me for a
password when it attempts to mount /dev/ad0. This is left over from an
old atempt at removable fulldisk encryption that is no longer used. I
can type the password wrong 3 time and then it mounts /dev/ad0 as
normal.
On 11/18/06 11:37, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Eric Schuele [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I usually use cvsup5.us.freebsd.org. but it has not given me any new
bits for several days now. And if I use ANY other server what usually
takes five minutes, takes 30-minutes to an hour (or they just
hang).
On Saturday 18 November 2006 13:07, Eric Schuele wrote:
On 11/18/06 11:37, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Eric Schuele [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I usually use cvsup5.us.freebsd.org. but it has not given me any new
bits for several days now. And if I use ANY other server what usually
takes five
That's good. Thanks for the help!
But I forgot to ask: Is WPA managed through some other layer(like
wpa_supplicant), or is it integrated into iwconfig?
From,
Nate Peck
On 11/16/06, Christian Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
it's not about the ath-chipset in this case. The chip works
Hi,
I'm running into a problem trying to install
5.5-RELEASE from FTP. I've tried a few sites, and none of
them seem to have the crypto package. Is there something
I can do to supplement/replace this need?
Thanks, Tuc
___
On Saturday 18 November 2006 12:46, VeeJay wrote:
On a freshly installed FreeBSD System, what step should be taken first?
Kernel should be Rebuilded FIRST or cvsup should be Run FIRST?
Check out this URL for more definitive information:
Chapter 21 The Cutting Edge
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 02:31:36PM -0500, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
Hi,
I'm running into a problem trying to install
5.5-RELEASE from FTP. I've tried a few sites, and none of
them seem to have the crypto package. Is there something
I can do to supplement/replace this need?
Why do
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 02:31:36PM -0500, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
Hi,
=20
I'm running into a problem trying to install
5.5-RELEASE from FTP. I've tried a few sites, and none of
them seem to have the crypto package. Is there something=20
I can do to supplement/replace this need?
In the tcpdump output below, the src machine is sending data to the
bsd machine. At one point during this test, the bsd machine is slowly
falling behind, as shown in the smaller and smaller window size.
It looks like at one point, the bsd machine takes 5.5 seconds to
ack a packet. :-( Am I
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 03:15:40PM -0500, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 02:31:36PM -0500, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
Hi,
=20
I'm running into a problem trying to install
5.5-RELEASE from FTP. I've tried a few sites, and none of
them seem to have the crypto
Read the last line on _any_ email on this list.
Aww c'mon guys! He asked very nicely, and he's obviously a non-techie. I
sent an un-sub for him; hopefully he can handle the confirmation part, if
there is one.
if he can't read - i don't think so.
-W
If he uses linux, there's probly a broken RPM for that.
On 11/18/06, Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Read the last line on _any_ email on this list.
Aww c'mon guys! He asked very nicely, and he's obviously a non-techie. I
sent an un-sub for him; hopefully he can handle the
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 03:15:40PM -0500, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 02:31:36PM -0500, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
Hi,
=3D20
I'm running into a problem trying to install
5.5-RELEASE from FTP. I've tried a few sites, and none of
them seem to have
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 03:43:00PM -0500, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 03:15:40PM -0500, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 02:31:36PM -0500, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
Hi,
=3D20
I'm running into a problem trying to install
Hi;
I've installed both qmail and vpopmail from ports. Qmail is up and running
because of the great instructions provided. But I haven't figured out how to
get vpopmail up (and, of course, working with qmail). Please help.
Rachel
With OpenBSD securelevel=2 I can install a kernel, make build, and
install programs which are compiled using Systrace.
What is the highest securelevel that I can configure on RELENG_6_2
which will not affect compiling and installing; e.g., perhaps not
much local difference but having to reboot
gahn wrote:
hi all:
trying to install package freeradius and it is using
package openldap-client-2.3.29. but i have problems
to get openldap-client-2.3.29 installed:
=== openldap-client-2.3.29 conflicts with installed
package(s):
openldap-client-2.2.30
They install files into
797984- Original Message
From: Peter Thoenen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dev.qmailrocks.org/qmail/freebsd/109 is your friend.
Well, going to that page led me to this as the authority for vpopmail:
http://dev.qmailrocks.org/qmail/freebsd/vpopmail_std.htm
(I already have qmail working.)
Don't install qmail from the port, which includes a whole bunch of
ill-advised patches. Instead, download and install netqmail 1.05 from
www.qmail.org, which has a small set of patches that really work.
I've been meaning to make a port of netqmail, but haven't had time yet.
You'll also want
- Original Message
From: John L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why would I want to rip out a perfectly good installation?
Because it's not perfectly good. Many of the patches only sort of work.
I just want to get vpopmail working with qmail.
If you don't care whether it crashes mysteriously
But...I already have qmail working from port!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:local/vpopmail/bin (106) ps|grep qmail
368 con- S 0:00.93 supervise qmail-send
370 con- S 0:00.91 supervise qmail-smtpd
813 con- I 0:00.02 qmail-lspawn ./Mailbox
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:local/vpopmail/bin (107)
Why
Hi,
I'm using a computer with FreeBSD as a gateway and NAT for a private
LAN. Let's say the gateway has external.com as external address, and
192.168.0.1 as internal address, so that the LAN is 192.168.0.0/24.
I'm doing a number of port redirects in the gateway, for svn, http,
https, ssh, etc
Hi. I have recently tried to compile gcc34 port with java by modifying
Makefile by adding the argument
--enable-languages=c,c++,java
This failed giving me a list of languages that excluded java. This
version of gcc is capable of compiling with java. Can someone provide
some advice on getting
On Nov 18, 2006, at 4:50 PM, Rachel Florentine wrote:
Well, going to that page led me to this as the authority for vpopmail:
http://dev.qmailrocks.org/qmail/freebsd/vpopmail_std.htm
I've installed qmail/vpopmail many ways - from source, using the
instructions from qmailrocks and most
Am getting a lot of these:
Nov 18 12:54:19 Grumpy kernel: link_elf_lookup_symbol: missing symbol
hash table
in /var/log/messages and dmesg with 6.2-PRERELEASE. Reading /usr/src/
UPDATING has been of no use, nor searching the mailing list archives.
The message appears on the text console
Eric Schuele [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 11/18/06 11:37, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Eric Schuele [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I usually use cvsup5.us.freebsd.org. but it has not given me any new
bits for several days now. And if I use ANY other server what usually
takes five minutes, takes
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 07:19:16PM -0400, David Pratt wrote:
Hi. I have recently tried to compile gcc34 port with java by modifying
Makefile by adding the argument
--enable-languages=c,c++,java
This failed giving me a list of languages that excluded java. This
version of gcc is capable
Hi Kris. I realize the java support prior to 4 requires a ton of RAM to
compile but I also know the compiler is reasonably good afterwards (from
other platforms) but have not been successful with FreeBSD at this
point. I attempted a few tries at 4.1 an 4.2 today and getting this
sort of an
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 08:58:01PM -0400, David Pratt wrote:
Hi Kris. I realize the java support prior to 4 requires a ton of RAM to
compile but I also know the compiler is reasonably good afterwards (from
other platforms) but have not been successful with FreeBSD at this
point.
I
On 11/18/06 18:32, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Eric Schuele [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 11/18/06 11:37, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Eric Schuele [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I usually use cvsup5.us.freebsd.org. but it has not given me any new
bits for several days now. And if I use ANY other server
In the last episode (Nov 18), Dieter said:
In the tcpdump output below, the src machine is sending data to the
bsd machine. At one point during this test, the bsd machine is
slowly falling behind, as shown in the smaller and smaller window
size.
It looks like at one point, the bsd machine
John, there's a rationalle for using ports, you know. A very, very
strong argument in favor of them.
In general I agree. The qmail port, unlike most of the other ports, is
junk.
Would you mind telling me how to get vpopmail working?
If you really want to know, please read chapter 13 of
My comments are based both on the packet dump here and the source code
you posted earlier ...
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 12:20:33 +
Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the tcpdump output below, the src machine is sending data to the
bsd machine. At one point during this test, the bsd machine is
Hi,
I have a NetGear WG111 usb wireless network adapter. Is there any way to
use this? I get the ugen0: with the name of the adapter. How much further can
I get? What's the next step?
Thankyou,
Nathan
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
7883- Original Message
From: Tom Ierna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've installed qmail/vpopmail many ways - from source, using the instructions
from qmailrocks and most recently using the instructions found here:
http://www.tnpi.biz/internet/mail/toaster/install.shtml108
The toaster method
- Original Message
From: John L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In general I agree. The qmail port, unlike most of the other ports, is
junk.
I didn't realize you're the author of O'Reilly's book on Qmail :)
I'll take your opinion a little more seriously.
I noticed that although I have all my
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rachel Florentine
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 1:19 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Qmail Vpopmail From Ports
Hi;
I've installed both qmail and vpopmail from ports. Qmail is up and
On Nov 18, 2006, at 9:54 PM, Rachel Florentine wrote:
make test resulted in this:
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
--
-
t/Toaster.t1 256411 2.44% 22
The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical
examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly
to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people
know what's available on the website. Before you post a question
here it might be a good idea to first search the
On Saturday 18 November 2006 20:54, Rachel Florentine wrote:
7883- Original Message
From: Tom Ierna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've installed qmail/vpopmail many ways - from source, using the
instructions from qmailrocks and most recently using the instructions
found here:
Darrel wrote:
With OpenBSD securelevel=2 I can install a kernel, make build, and
install programs which are compiled using Systrace.
What is the highest securelevel that I can configure on RELENG_6_2
which will not affect compiling and installing; e.g., perhaps not
much local difference but
Dan writes:
Dan A shrinking window and no packet loss is an indication that the program
Dan the socket is connected to isn't reading data fast enough. If you're
Dan locally gzipping the output of a remote backup, for example, you'll see
Dan this.
Just a tight loop reading the socket and writing
82 matches
Mail list logo
