yes, purely for experimenting...I have a lab of different pc'S and am
LEARNING as much as possible about FreeBSD. Once I iron out this routing
thing (that I don`t understand as well as most), I will move on to
simulating a VPN between different sites throughout America. All the
machines are
Hey all. I've got a problem on one of my systems (lack of drive
space) that forced me to remove /usr/src. However, I like that system
to track the STABLE version. I don't think it'd be a problem, but I'd
like someone else to confirm this. Would there be any problems if I put
I have a FreeBSD machine that tended to hang in the recent past. After a few tests I
managed to clearly isolate one
condition that causes this kernel panics.
If I do a tcpdump -l -i fxp0 I'm sure the machine will lock in less than 3 second.
The same happens (in a more or less short time) if
Actually, I only need it for restore, dump is handled by cron.
Anyone know of anything? I basically need a GUI that will load
all the file/directory information off tape and display it so
someone other than me can pick files to restore
(the command-
line interface is too cumberson for
I'm trying to get an email auto-responder working
using vacation, but have hit a bit of a wall.
I have the .forward file in the user's home directory
containing:
\mikew, |/usr/bin/vacation -r 1 mikew
(Where mikew is the login for this user)
I have a .vacation.msg file available in the
I get a startup message like this:
Mar 11 03:02:52 lorax sm-mta[22980]: h2B92pBL022966: SYSERR(root):
x74-47.forestry.umn.edu. config error: mail loops back to me (MX
problem?)
Mar 11 03:02:52 lorax sm-mta[22985]: h2B92qBL022981: SYSERR(root):
x74-47.forestry.umn.edu. config error: mail
I'm wondering how, given my scenario, I should set-up the MX record for
my domain (and all the domains I host)
In your primary domain, set up your main MX records as:
$ORIGIN domain.com.
mailIN A 192.1.1.1
mail2 IN A 192.2.2.2
@ IN MX 10 mail
@
I was playing around with a network scanner today called Retina (for the
W32 platform) and was wondering if there is anything in the ports or
anywhere else that performs equally or similarly to it.
None of my machines run X (including my laptop) so I am hoping to find
something that generates
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 12:48:44PM +, Matthew Faircliff wrote:
Hello,
Hiya,
Have you tried using libapreq? I find that it is a superior method of transmitting
POST data. Find it in /usr/ports/www/p5-libapreq.
$my_posted_var = $r-parms{'my_var'};
Nope haven't tried it yet,
Can you send me some information about how much space freebsd will take
up, i want to keep Win XP as my main OS ... Thanks.
Although Free can be installed on a partition under 500M, 3G will give you
more than adequate playing space, with some reasonable storage in your
home directory.
I like
I was wondering what terminal mail clients there are for FreeBSD.
And which one is best for reply rules or reply opitons.
# /usr/ports/mail/pine
IMHO
Steve
Thanks
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
To
Been browsing for a bit (knowing I will get some rtfm responses from this) but
havnt come across a solid answer for this. Most solutions involve NAT or some
other non-routable ip block type of solution.
Have the following (192.168.100.0/24 used in place of routable addresses)
- Internet
I decided today it was time to install bind9 from ports and I am have
having some issues I need help with. Under 8.* I started BIND with the -u
bind -g bind flags and a sockstat -4 showed named running as user bind.
However, in 9.* I understand the -u bind flag is enough, but the server
# install -c -m freebsd.cf /etc/mail/sendmail.cf
Install: Invalid file mode: freebsd.cf
Has anyone else experienced this during their sendmail upgrade?
Does the file /usr/share/mk/bsd.own.mk exist?
If yes, does it contain a definition of SHAREMODE?
% grep SHAREMODE
# install -c -m freebsd.cf /etc/mail/sendmail.cf
Install: Invalid file mode: freebsd.cf
Has anyone else experienced this during their sendmail upgrade?
Does the file /usr/share/mk/bsd.own.mk exist?
If yes, does it contain a definition of SHAREMODE?
% grep SHAREMODE
# install -c -m freebsd.cf /etc/mail/sendmail.cf
Install: Invalid file mode: freebsd.cf
Has anyone else experienced this during their sendmail upgrade?
Does the file /usr/share/mk/bsd.own.mk exist?
If yes, does it contain a definition of SHAREMODE?
% grep SHAREMODE
# install -c -m freebsd.cf /etc/mail/sendmail.cf
Install: Invalid file mode: freebsd.cf
Has anyone else experienced this during their sendmail upgrade?
Does the file /usr/share/mk/bsd.own.mk exist?
If yes, does it contain a definition of SHAREMODE?
# install -c -m freebsd.cf /etc/mail/sendmail.cf
Install: Invalid file mode: freebsd.cf
Has anyone else experienced this during their sendmail upgrade?
Does the file /usr/share/mk/bsd.own.mk exist?
If yes, does it contain a definition of SHAREMODE?
Alternatively is there a way to dynamically tell BIND to get it's
forwarders list from /etc/resolv.conf?
This could be done pretty much the same way. I thought I'd done it on
my system, but as I look at named.conf, I don't seem to have ever
finished the shell script to auto-generate the
What did I miss? Does one have to become an expert to work with this OS?
All I have to say is that people tell me that practice makes perfect
(eventually, with help from these lists of course ;o)
No one can know everything, so it's the frustration and anguish that makes
success much more
Ok, everything went reasonably well with cvsup upgrade, buildworld,
buildkernel. After installkernel, everything appears to load perfectly,
until I try to send data to the box. IPFW barfs on a SIG 11.
Assuming that it is loading ok at boot, can I properly assume that this
will be repaired when I
I have lived with this for quite a while, but now that I would like to get
some of my bind logs, I had to ask.
Last summer, I managed to get BIND 9 running in a jail, (howto I generated
is here: http://ww3.northnetworks.ca/docs/named_jail).
It works perfectly fine, but there is no logging taking
It works perfectly fine, but there is no logging taking place. I have fed
syslogd the following in rc.conf:
#syslogd_flags=-s -l /chroot/named/dev/log
Try:
syslogd_flags=-s -l /chroot/named/var/run/log
Same effect. No logging being done. Ironic part is, I can't check the logs
to see
It works perfectly fine, but there is no logging taking place. I have fed
syslogd the following in rc.conf:
#syslogd_flags=-s -l /chroot/named/dev/log
Try:
syslogd_flags=-s -l /chroot/named/var/run/log
Same effect. No logging being done. Ironic part is, I can't check the
If the scenerio I described above seems to fit, yes. Sounds like things
are going well. If you want to be REAL paranoid, you could try rebuilding
your kernel with IFPW_DEFAULT_ACCEPT (or whatever that option is) and make
sure you have network connectivity before continuing.
I wouldn't
This same question was asked yesterday (I think), but I accidently deleted
the thread, and it hasnt hit the archives yet.
I have upgraded from 4.3 to 4.8, and a telnet to sendmail states
8.12.8/8.11.3.
Someone had responded on how to upgrade just the .cf to reflect the new
binary version. Could
# cd /etc/mail
# tar cf - *.cf | gzip -9c - oldcf.tar.gz
Then regenerate all the *.cf files:
# make cf
Install them as sendmail.cf and submit.cf:
# make install
At this point it fails with:
# install -c -m freebsd.cf /etc/mail/sendmail.cf
slower speed (4x is as low as I get), but I'm still at a point where the
system responds with:
Boot from ATAPI CD-ROM: Failure...
No /boot/loader
Did you try to download the floppies, boot from them, then direct /stand
to point to the CD as the install media?
Steve
I assume that ATAPI
Time for me to install another Apache in a different
location, so I can have two, differently configured,
Apache installs running side-by-side.
I have done this successfully by installing from source and running
configure with the following:
#./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache_prod
and
Basically:
Update your source with cvsup
read /usr/src/UPDATING and follow any instructions required (I believe
you'll need to manually create the relatively new sendmail users)
Reveiw you kernel config file to see if any options have changed since
4.3
make
i am able to perform the following command fine when i want to send mail on the
local network.
cat input_message.txt | mail -s hello world [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is there a flag that i can pass to mail to tell it to use the proper server for
when i want to perform this operation to an address
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Brian Henning wrote:
On 2003-03-06 10:51, Brian Henning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i am able to perform the following command fine when i want to send
mail on the local network.
cat input_message.txt | mail -s hello world [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is there a flag
I am going to attempt the above in order as stated. I have read UPDATING,
have the handbook open. One thing I am confused about: The next line after
my new text states that this should give me a new config. My understanding
is that buildworld will build the system, but not install it. Am I
IAccounts wrote:
I may be wrong, but ...
Do this order:
make buildworld
make buildkernel
make installkernel
reboot
make installworld
I am going to attempt the above in order as stated. I have read UPDATING,
have the handbook open. One thing I am confused about: The next line after
Unfortunatly, I have never successfully upgraded a Free box yet, mind you
I have only tried it on one.
Last year I was dropped into a production environment with all 4.3
machines. I have no devel equipment prior to 4.6. The upgrade attempts
were all only on one box (4.6) and failed due to suspect
Unfortunatly, I have never successfully upgraded a Free box yet, mind you
I have only tried it on one.
Last year I was dropped into a production environment with all 4.3
machines. I have no devel equipment prior to 4.6. The upgrade attempts
were all only on one box (4.6) and failed due
Basically:
Update your source with cvsup
read /usr/src/UPDATING and follow any instructions required (I believe
you'll need to manually create the relatively new sendmail users)
Reveiw you kernel config file to see if any options have changed since
4.3
make buildkernel
make
Couple of questions regarding this Sendmail-related security advisory:
1. Am I right in assuming that the machines that have
sendmail_enable=NONE in /etc/rc.conf are not vulnerable? How about
sendmail_enable=NO?
2. On one of my 4.7-RELEASE-p6 servers, I'm running Postfix as MTA.
I have
Or you could consider helping find a way to re-enable
the www to send-pr while preventing script kiddies from
abusing it.
Why not have a pr-moderator for each category (i386, kern, doc, etc), who
approves each incoming PR. Basically this person would act as a front-line
defense against
I have a freebsd 4.0 server with sendmail 8.9.3
that is acting as an open relay server now.
beginning to get lost after trying so many ways to stop it.
any help will be most appreciated.
Check out the access and relay-domains files for sendmail.
Tons of info in google regarding how these
I'm running FreeBSD 5.0, I think that my isp have recently block ports on me. I know
the block port 82. But is there a way I can test to see if other ports are blocked?
# cd /usr/ports/security/nmap
# make make install make clean
# man (8) nmap
Best if you can run it on a machine foreign
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Emmanuel Gravel wrote:
I was looking into setting up a wireless network at home. I'm already using
FreeBSD 4.4 as my gateway/firewall (NATD/ipfw/junkbuster) for my wired network.
I was initially looking at a Cisco 350 as an access point and Orinoco cards for
the
While hosting mail for several domains, a local user
with an account name of say biz has a domain of say domain.com
would receive mail from other domains hosted at the same site
such as [EMAIL PROTECTED].
What I am looking for is a general setup criteria that would eliminate this
behavior
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 04:28:14PM -0500, IAccounts wrote:
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
is java or javascript goods languages to learn?
if no what is the best language to start with, the second and the third
thank you for your answer
Depends on what you want to learn
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Viny wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 02:57:21PM +0100 or thereabouts, Peter J. Blok may have
written :
I don't use the pccard stuff for the 2602. I just kldload if_wi or compile
device wi inside the kernel.
Thanks for your quick answer !
So there is no
I went to my kernel to look at line 76 and this is where it put me
(using vi):
(Cursor here)#Floppy Drives
device fdc0at isa? port IO_FD1 irq 6 drq 2
device fd0 at fdc0 drive 0
device fd1 at fdc0 drive 1
I can't figure this out. As there is not 0 in
is java or javascript goods languages to learn?
if no what is the best language to start with, the second and the third
thank you for your answer
Depends on what you want to learn.
Perl: Extremely flexible text string manipulation features and scripting
features. Relatively easy to learn.
Feb 16 18:35:06 voo /kernel: arplookup 213.196.2.97 failed: host is
not on local network
Feb 16 18:35:06 voo /kernel: arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for
13.16.2.97rt
I had this back in the summer time, and it was due to having an IP
address aliased on one of my nics in a block that was not
48 matches
Mail list logo
