you've added one character too many to the filename.
Look for:
/etc/resolv.conf
It should be there unless you've managed to delete it somehow. If
you're using DHCP to configure your machine, note that DHCP will update
the contents of this file.
--
--Jon Radel
j...@radel.
hould help pass the time.
--
--Jon Radel
j...@radel.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
ermore, if I now type
ci foo
If you want to have foo writable and ready for changes, you need to lock
it. Try:
co -l foo
I suggest you read up on the -u and -l options in the man pages. The
commands I use most often personally are:
ci -u foo
co -l foo
--
--Jon Radel
j...@radel.com
Glen Barber wrote:
Try escaping it:
alias svn\ log='svn log-v'
Or just use your own command name:
alias svnv='svn log -v'
--Jon Radel
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/
the more hits that
she didn't like would show up.
--Jon Radel
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
gs happening on them? Have you read
through all your BIOS settings looking for clues?
--Jon Radel
j...@radel.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any m
lhost,
> and resolv.conf is pointing to localhost. Any ideas?
Too much sanitation makes it hard to figure out your problem. However,
if that amnesiac. is actually amnesiac.com this probably relates to
the fact that DNS for amnesiac.com is horribly broken.
dig +trace amnesiac.com
should s
Ansar Mohammed wrote:
> Been there, did that same result :)
And in what country is the IP address you were coming from? It can make
a huge difference when dealing with a company which has to comply with
export regulations for some of their products.
--Jon Radel
j...@radel.com
smime.
uses up a bit more space in the rack. I suggest you
discuss this all with your vendor; they're the only people who know what
they're willing to do and how much they'll charge for it.
--Jon Radel
j...@radel.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
ne per domain at any level.
--Jon Radel
j...@radel.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
gt; Ithaca, NY
Locally, probably nowhere. But try
www.staples.com
where there's currently one type of paper available by the ream or case.
Of course, it costs more and then you'll need to get A4 binders,
slightly longer file folders, a new file cabinet,
It's not easy switching.
--Jon Radel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
x27;). This
group requirement may be changed by modifying the ``pam_group'' section
of /etc/pam.d/su. See pam_group(8) for details on how to modify this
setting.
which may well be why the OP keeps stressing that his unprivileged user
is not in the wheel group. ;-)
--Jon Radel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
, however, that in the future you constrain your e-mail to
freebsd-questions to either questions or answers to them, so as to not
inflame our more excitable representatives once we hire a new, much
reduced, batch of them.
Thanks.
--Jon Radel
Who will now resign in shame
___
y now, recursively destroying
information in or about system files tends to be a bad idea. As is, as
a general rule, using chown as a privileged user just so that you can
edit a file such as this as an unprivileged user.
--Jon Radel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
search. While
I'm sure there are other ways of achieving this, this is the one I use
on a regular basis.
--Jon Radel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
both exist and have a similar relationship, but
you don't need them to address the security flaw that has everyone so
excited.
--Jon Radel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
any use to your software. See something like
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6_translation_mechanisms for more.
--Jon Radel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
is that it just works. ;-)
--Jon Radel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
, so the important question is
whether you created a .cf file from your .mc file post your change and
then restarted sendmail? Assuming mx0.cs1.sri.com is the hostname of
the server you're building,
cd /etc/mail
make install
make restart
may well be all you need.
--Jon Radel
smim
cked down or having a static
entry (or really, really long expire times) for the IP address you've
given newdewey. Ordinarily I'd worry that you had a longer netmask on
the gateway than on your new machine, but with dewey at .3 (which works,
yes?), newdewey at .5, and the gateway at .1, t
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jon Radel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 6:15 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Wojciech Puchar; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: OT: lots of IPv6 DNS requests
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original
the
case; and maybe he'll be able to convince whomever runs the parent
nameserver(s) to update the records for his zone. (Just to cover the
rest of your questions. :-)
--Jon Radel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
plenty that do. Is this your fault? I haven't the foggiest. I would
suggest you go and talk to your parents about why they're making you so
unhappy. :-)
--Jon Radel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jon Radel
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 4:02 PM
To: Wojciech Puchar
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: OT: lots of IPv6 DNS requests
Nameservers are hitting an address
e address in question and even looked up the nameserver
which is handing out that address in a glue record. All you do is get
petulant about how the answer to what turns out to be a rhetorical
question is, "no." D'oh; which I certainly hope translates properly.
--Jon Radel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
ven's sake. We all know you like to shoot off your mouth.
Now go back to my mail and read it ALL THE WAY THROUGH BEFORE YOU ANSWER
AGAIN. Jeez.
--Jon Radel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
8.142
dns2.tensor.gdynia.pl. 28800 IN 2001:4070:101::1
dns3.tensor.gdynia.pl. 28800 IN A 83.12.228.78
dns3.tensor.gdynia.pl. 28800 IN 2001:4070:101:2::1
Inconsistent from some of your other parents. Might want to clean up a
bit. ;-)
--Jon R
I'm a touch confused,
however, by your phrasing that as if you're rebutting something I wrote.)
--Jon Radel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
ion on this and related topics.
My suggestion would be to let both sides auto-detect if they're both
capable of gigabit ethernet.
--Jon Radel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
ts, I suspect you will have to install something more
sophisticated, such as procmail from ports.
I'm using the Thunderbird.
Or, you could set up rules in Thunderbird to do the forwarding from
there. Of course, this means that mail gets forwarded only when
account1 checks for mail.
-
other than in hobbyist's private networks and things built with
volunteer labor, there are generally labor costs. Rummaging in the junk
pile can get pretty expensive if you have to pay somebody to do it....
--Jon Radel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
sonally I doubt this is anything serious to
worry about, but as I have no real evidence for that feeling You
may, however, find http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0.0.0.0 at least mildly
interesting.
--Jon Radel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Jon Radel wrote:
Christer Solskogen wrote:
Derek Ragona wrote:
I would do a traceroute from all your hosts there. When you do keep
an eye out for the arp error message. This should help find the host
causing these errors and then look at that systems configuration.
Also do you have more
atch
one, this will give you the MAC address of the source of the traffic. I
would hope that this would help narrow it down.
Meanwhile, I'll see if I can replicate this when I'm paying a bit more
attention. :-)
--Jon Radel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
ssage or misconfiguration.
Did you configure apache at all after you installed it? If so, what did
you do?
--Jon Radel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Use ssh-agent
right and you can make things even easier for yourself.
>
> having to log through 2 accounts doesn't increase security. actually
> increases mess.
The only mess I can think of is all that logging that forces a bit of
accountability onto all the admins who know the roo
at any time with
very little loss of already transferred bytes, you may find it more
resilient in your situation.
--Jon Radel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
/MySQL/etc. are well supported under. You may well do better to
find a "Use Apache to build a web site" or "(language of your choice)
with (database of your choice)" book that suits your development
philosophy.
--Jon Radel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Jon Radel wrote:
> herbert langhans wrote:
>> Hi Daemons,
>> recently I had to add some more RAM on a workstation. Was 512MB before and
>> is 2GB now, the reason was to give some graphic apps more space.
>>
>> But to my surprise the workstation ran faster--but
r, as is usually the case, unless you do some benchmarks on *your*
computer, it's hard to say more than "the first couple GB of RAM you add
will probably make your workstation run faster."
--Jon Radel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
s with FreeBSD.
>>
>> This works:
>>
>> AllowUsers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
>> PROTECTED]
>>
> man hosts.allow
Now that would really confuse things. We're not talking tcp wrappers
here, or at least we weren't.
man sshd_config
--Jon Radel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
;m the guy who takes the time to put on his seatbelt each and
every time he starts the car, despite never, not once, having to
actually use it in 3 decades of driving.
> Firewalls are too often crutches for people that don't want to learn
> how to properly maintain a host.
Now t
ome of us are convinced that we further
reduce our risk from scanning by turning off password access and forcing
the use of keys.
--Jon Radel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
name & password while the other users getting to that
> folder/directory.
Assuming you're using Samba for this, you'll need to read up on
authentication in Samba and then figure out which of several options are
configured on your system. It is not [necessarily] sufficient to add a
F
s that
supplied with pf. See ftp-proxy(8) or
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/ftp.html
--Jon Radel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
me of your directory
is so embarrassing that you can't share it. By sanitizing such things,
rather than reporting exactly what you typed and exactly what the
response is, you seriously risk editing out clues. If you already knew
what was important as a clue, you probably wouldn't need to ask the
question.
--Jon Radel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
dresses but can't afford to shut
everything down long enough to change everything all at once.
There are others.
--Jon Radel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
If not, you'll have real
trouble reading anything off of your disks. With software RAID, you at
least stand a decent chance of recovering everything from nothing more
than the (N-1) hard disks, a FreeBSD CD-ROM, and the components to build
a new server around them.
--Jon Radel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-addr.arpa. 259200 IN NS ns0.0.111.66.in-addr.arpa.
0.111.66.in-addr.arpa. 259200 IN NS ns1.0.111.66.in-addr.arpa.
;; Received 107 bytes from 66.111.0.253#53(ns1.identry.com) in 17 ms
The PTR record looks reasonable, but those NS records...well. ;-)
--Jon Radel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
101 - 149 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
