wrong architecture used for apache build

2007-10-30 Thread Noah
Hi, I am trying to figure out why the wrong architecture when I am building apache. Any clues where I can correct this information? Cheers, Noah access1# uname -a FreeBSD access1.pslab.juniper.net 6.2-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p6 #1: Wed Aug 1 22:59:54 PDT 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED

apache mod_ssl chroot problem

2007-10-17 Thread Muhammad Reza
Dear List. I have problem running apache in chroot mode with ssl enable. Apache in chroot mode running fine without ssl enable, but when i try to start with mod_ssl enable, error occured with this message. beastie#chroot /chroot/httpd /usr/local/apache2/bin/httpd Apache/2.2.6 mod_ssl/2.2.6 (Pass

Re: apache mod_ssl chroot problem

2007-10-17 Thread Daniel Bye
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 08:46:01PM +0700, Muhammad Reza wrote: Dear List. I have problem running apache in chroot mode with ssl enable. Apache in chroot mode running fine without ssl enable, but when i try to start with mod_ssl enable, error occured with this message. beastie#chroot

Re: apache mod_ssl chroot problem

2007-10-17 Thread James
Server beastie.mra.co.id:443 (RSA) Enter pass phrase:Apache:mod_ssl:Error: Private key not found. **Stopped Isn't the private key the one on the local machine? If so, is the private key visible with the chroot environment? ___

Re: apache mod_ssl chroot problem

2007-10-17 Thread Muhammad Reza
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 08:29 -0600, James wrote: Server beastie.mra.co.id:443 (RSA) Enter pass phrase:Apache:mod_ssl:Error: Private key not found. **Stopped Isn't the private key the one on the local machine? If so, is the private key visible with the chroot environment?

Re: apache mod_ssl chroot problem

2007-10-17 Thread Beastie
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 13:38 +0100, Daniel Bye wrote: On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 08:46:01PM +0700, Muhammad Reza wrote: Dear List. I have problem running apache in chroot mode with ssl enable. Apache in chroot mode running fine without ssl enable, but when i try to start with mod_ssl

problem with apache

2007-10-14 Thread TAJUL AZHAR Mohd Tajul Ariffin
hi all I had a problem with my apache22. I had install it fropm the port but accidently I install it again and I got the message to deinstall if I want to uninstall. I enable upon boot up the apache into rc.d. After I reboot I got the message that my apache cannot run into localhost. I had install

Getting coredumps from Apache

2007-10-12 Thread Toomas Aas
Hello! I have apache22 (with standard prefork mpm) and php5 (Apache module) installed from ports. I'm noticing a lot of httpd children dying with signal 11 messages and would like to get a coredump in order to diagnose the problem. However, I can't get any coredumps from Apache. I created

OpenSSL/PHP/Apache problem

2007-10-06 Thread Don O'Neil
Any time I compile PHP 4.4.7 with --with-ssl my apache 1.3.39 server core dumps on start up on my FreeBSD 6.1 dual core AMD X2 box (in 32 bit mode). Anyone have a work around for this or suggestions where to look/try? I was having a similar problem with Curl, but once I told curl where

Re: Is Apache rotatelogs efficienct for real world use?

2007-10-03 Thread Chuck Swiger
Olivier Nicole wrote: Is Apache rotatelogs suitable for handling large volumes of access logs, i.e. around 50K requests per hour at _peak_ time which is 1.2M requests per day. According to Apache website (http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/logs.html#rotation) this becomes about 120MB in size per

Apache 2.2.4 with mod_ssl start up problem

2007-10-03 Thread Dan Parks
Apache 2.2.4 with mod_ssl start up problem I have the same problem when trying to start Apache 2.0.61 and Openssl 0.9.8 Did you ever get a response or figure out what the problem was? Dan Parks ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http

Apache port OPTIONs support

2007-10-02 Thread Barry Byrne
All, Recently, the apache port changed as per the note in /usr/ports/UPDATING below. I used to build apache with the proxy modules: make WITH_PROXY_MODULES=yes install I've now tried: make WITHOUT_APACHE_OPTIONS=YES WITH_PROXY_MODULES=yes install This builds the proxy modules, but leaves

Is Apache rotatelogs efficienct for real world use?

2007-10-01 Thread Bahman M.
Hi all, Is Apache rotatelogs suitable for handling large volumes of access logs, i.e. around 50K requests per hour at _peak_ time which is 1.2M requests per day. According to Apache website (http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/logs.html#rotation) this becomes about 120MB in size per day. Does

Re: Is Apache rotatelogs efficienct for real world use?

2007-10-01 Thread Eric Crist
On Oct 1, 2007, at 2:43 PMOct 1, 2007, Bahman M. wrote: Hi all, Is Apache rotatelogs suitable for handling large volumes of access logs, i.e. around 50K requests per hour at _peak_ time which is 1.2M requests per day. According to Apache website (http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/logs.html

Re: Is Apache rotatelogs efficienct for real world use?

2007-10-01 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi all, Is Apache rotatelogs suitable for handling large volumes of access logs, i.e. around 50K requests per hour at _peak_ time which is 1.2M requests per day. According to Apache website (http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/logs.html#rotation) this becomes about 120MB in size per day

Re: Is Apache rotatelogs efficienct for real world use?

2007-10-01 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Oct 1, 2007, at 3:43 PM, Bahman M. wrote: Is Apache rotatelogs suitable for handling large volumes of access logs, i.e. around 50K requests per hour at _peak_ time which is 1.2M requests per day. According to Apache website (http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/logs.html#rotation) this becomes

Re: Is Apache rotatelogs efficienct for real world use?

2007-10-01 Thread Bahman M.
On 2007-10-01 Eric Crist wrote: On Oct 1, 2007, at 2:43 PMOct 1, 2007, Bahman M. wrote: Hi all, Is Apache rotatelogs suitable for handling large volumes of access logs, i.e. around 50K requests per hour at _peak_ time which is 1.2M requests per day. According to Apache website

Re: Is Apache rotatelogs efficienct for real world use?

2007-10-01 Thread Olivier Nicole
Is Apache rotatelogs suitable for handling large volumes of access logs, i.e. around 50K requests per hour at _peak_ time which is 1.2M requests per day. According to Apache website (http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/logs.html#rotation) this becomes about 120MB in size per day. In another

Apache 2.0.61 and SSL start

2007-09-09 Thread Tim Kellers
I portupgraded my apache 2.0.59 to 61 today with no errors, but on restart, SSL wasn't loaded. /usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache2 start starts the server (I have apache2enable=YES in /etc/rc.conf), but ssl isn't loaded. apachectl -k start -DSSL prompts me for my sslcert passphrase, and, after I

Re: Apache 2.0.61 and SSL start

2007-09-09 Thread Tim Kellers
: Apache 2.0.61 and SSL start I portupgraded my apache 2.0.59 to 61 today with no errors, but on restart, SSL wasn't loaded. /usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache2 start starts the server (I have apache2enable=YES in /etc/rc.conf), but ssl isn't loaded. apachectl -k start -DSSL prompts me for my sslcert

Re: (error) Your apache does not support DSO modules

2007-08-29 Thread Anthony Philipp
I've since updated my ports tree again with the same error, so even though portupgrade says ! lang/php5 (php5-5.2.3_1) (Makefile broken) I think it's more likely that something else is wrong. Are there other things I might try? The DSO apache docs seem to be based on someone

(error) Your apache does not support DSO modules

2007-08-27 Thread Anthony Philipp
Hi, When I searched for DSO modules I found this page: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/dso but it doesn.t seem to have a similar page for the 2.2.x series of Apache. Am I hunting down the correct path? I also checked /usr/ports/UPDATING but unable to find anything of relevance there. I.ve

Re: (error) Your apache does not support DSO modules

2007-08-27 Thread Bob Johnson
/docs/1.3/dso but it doesn.t seem to have a similar page for the 2.2.x series of Apache. Am I hunting down the correct path? I also checked /usr/ports/UPDATING but unable to find anything of relevance there. I.ve included the error below. Any help is appreciated. Regards, Anthony --- Cleaning

Re: (error) Your apache does not support DSO modules

2007-08-27 Thread Anthony Philipp
in these errors? - Bob On 8/27/07, Anthony Philipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, When I searched for DSO modules I found this page: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/dso but it doesn.t seem to have a similar page for the 2.2.x series of Apache. Am I hunting down the correct path? I also

Problem: Apache chroots but MySQL doesn't

2007-08-17 Thread Adam J Richardson
exist. I don't think the chroot binary itself is a problem as it started Apache just fine. So, I'm out of ideas. Help please? TiA, Adam J Richardson ps. I always forget this bit: %uname -a FreeBSD my.server.com 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 12 10:40:27 UTC 2007 [EMAIL

apache problems

2007-08-16 Thread Reinhold
Hi I am having some problems with apache22 on my box. What happens is, when I'm viewing loads and loads of pages, apache will stop responding untill I restart it again. This normally happens when the free memory shown by top gets to about +- 100MB. Here is my dmesg output: Copyright (c) 1992

Re: apache problems

2007-08-16 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
options SCHED_ULE I would stick with 4BSD in 6.x series until 7.0-r then use SCHED_SMP Thats not your problem though. -- Philip M. Gollucci ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 323.219.4708 Senior System Admin - Riderway, Inc.

Re: apache problems

2007-08-16 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 02:02:09PM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: options SCHED_ULE I would stick with 4BSD in 6.x series until 7.0-r then use SCHED_SMP You mean SCHED_ULE. Thats not your problem though. It could be, it's too broken to use in 6.x and only fixed in 7.0. Kris

Re: apache problems

2007-08-16 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 02:02:09PM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: options SCHED_ULE I would stick with 4BSD in 6.x series until 7.0-r then use SCHED_SMP You mean SCHED_ULE. Thats not your problem though. Right, I forgot the name changed back. --

Re: apache problems

2007-08-16 Thread Hugo Silva
Reinhold wrote: Hi I am having some problems with apache22 on my box. What happens is, when I'm viewing loads and loads of pages, apache will stop responding untill I restart it again. This normally happens when the free memory shown by top gets to about +- 100MB. Here is my dmesg output

Re: apache problems

2007-08-16 Thread Reinhold
Thanks I'll switch back to 4BSD and see what happens On Thu, August 16, 2007 20:09, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 02:02:09PM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: options SCHED_ULE I would stick with 4BSD in 6.x series until 7.0-r then use SCHED_SMP

Re: apache problems

2007-08-16 Thread Reinhold
On Thu, August 16, 2007 20:16, Hugo Silva wrote: Reinhold wrote: Hi I am having some problems with apache22 on my box. What happens is, when I'm viewing loads and loads of pages, apache will stop responding untill I restart it again. This normally happens when the free memory shown by top

Re: apache problems

2007-08-16 Thread Hugo Silva
Reinhold wrote: On Thu, August 16, 2007 20:16, Hugo Silva wrote: Reinhold wrote: Hi I am having some problems with apache22 on my box. What happens is, when I'm viewing loads and loads of pages, apache will stop responding untill I restart it again. This normally happens when

Re: trouble with php4, apache, egroupware, memory allocation

2007-07-26 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:10:24 -0700 (PDT) Mark Busby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm running apache-1.3.37_4, php4-4.4.7, and eGroupWare-1.2.106_1. Apache error file is returning the following error when trying to access the calendar. PHP Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 16777216 bytes

trouble with php4, apache, egroupware, memory allocation

2007-07-25 Thread Mark Busby
I'm running apache-1.3.37_4, php4-4.4.7, and eGroupWare-1.2.106_1. Apache error file is returning the following error when trying to access the calendar. PHP Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 16777216 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 23040 bytes) I've searched but have not found

Re: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE apache 2.2.4 = bad performance. Help!

2007-07-20 Thread Stanislav Sedov
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 23:12:57 +0100 Michael Vaughn [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned: Hello everyone, I am contacting -performance, -questions, and -hackers in the hope someone helps me troubleshoot a problem with FreeBSD 6.2 and apache 2.2.4 Try to run truss(1) on any of apache processes

Re: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE apache 2.2.4 = bad performance. Help!

2007-07-19 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 23:12:57 +0100 Michael Vaughn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello everyone, I am contacting -performance, -questions, and -hackers in the hope someone helps me troubleshoot a problem with FreeBSD 6.2 and apache 2.2.4 [ responding in questions - removed unnecessary lists] can

FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE apache 2.2.4 = bad performance. Help!

2007-07-18 Thread Michael Vaughn
Hello everyone, I am contacting -performance, -questions, and -hackers in the hope someone helps me troubleshoot a problem with FreeBSD 6.2 and apache 2.2.4 uname: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE Fri Jun 22 12:17:03 UTC 2007 amd64 installed php modules: php5-5.2.3 PHP Scripting Language (Apache Module

Re: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE apache 2.2.4 = bad performance. Help!

2007-07-18 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Jul 18, 2007, at 3:12 PM, Michael Vaughn wrote: Hello everyone, Hi-- I am contacting -performance, -questions, and -hackers in the hope someone helps me troubleshoot a problem with FreeBSD 6.2 and apache 2.2.4 Please don't cross-post between multiple FreeBSD lists; pick the most

Fwd: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE apache 2.2.4 = bad performance. Help!

2007-07-18 Thread Michael Vaughn
On 7/19/07, Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jul 18, 2007, at 3:12 PM, Michael Vaughn wrote: Hello everyone, Hi-- I am contacting -performance, -questions, and -hackers in the hope someone helps me troubleshoot a problem with FreeBSD 6.2 and apache 2.2.4 Please don't cross-post

Re: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE apache 2.2.4 = bad performance. Help!

2007-07-18 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Jul 18, 2007, at 4:15 PM, Michael Vaughn wrote: Your Apache processes are huge; mine typically stay under 20MB in VSIZE even with PHP loaded (this is Apache-2.0.59 + PHP 4.4.7 or PHP 5.2.x). I suspect your PHP app(s) are leaking memory or otherwise have some significant problems with the way

Re: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE apache 2.2.4 = bad performance. Help!

2007-07-18 Thread Michael Vaughn
On 7/19/07, Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jul 18, 2007, at 4:15 PM, Michael Vaughn wrote: Your Apache processes are huge; mine typically stay under 20MB in VSIZE even with PHP loaded (this is Apache-2.0.59 + PHP 4.4.7 or PHP 5.2.x). I suspect your PHP app(s) are leaking memory

RE: stopping connect attacks in apache (solution)

2007-06-30 Thread Bob
On Jun 15, 2007, at 7:49 PM, Bob wrote: Every time my apache server slows down or has denial of service the access log is full this 61.228.122.220 - CONNECT 66.196.97.250:25 HTTP/1.0 200 7034 - - 61.228.122.220 - CONNECT 216.39.53.3:25 HTTP/1.0 200 7034 - - 61.228.122.220 - CONNECT

Help getting apache 22 working

2007-06-27 Thread Andrew Falanga
Hi, I've installed apache 22 on my churches web server and am having some difficulty getting it working. I've figured out that I need something call accept filters accept_filter(9) for this as the server was complaining about a missing file named httpready (or something like this). I found

Re: Help getting apache 22 working

2007-06-27 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:42:11 -0600 Andrew Falanga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've installed apache 22 on my churches web server and am having some difficulty getting it working. I've figured out that I need something call accept filters accept_filter(9) for this as the server

Re: Help getting apache 22 working

2007-06-27 Thread Andrew Falanga
On 6/27/07, Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: accf_http is not compulsory for apache to work. Ah, ok. That's good to know, though I did put the module to autoload in my loader.conf file. However, the server still isn't working as a lynx localhost is denied and sockstat doesn't

Permanent apache patch

2007-06-25 Thread Josh
Gidday there, I have my own change to suexec in apache 2.0 from ports. What I want to know is the best way to have my patch applied each time I compile apache, without too much effort from me? Eg, say for the sake of example my patch is in /usr/local/src/foopatch/ How would I get the ports

Re: Permanent apache patch

2007-06-25 Thread Roland Smith
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 09:01:21PM +1200, Josh wrote: Gidday there, I have my own change to suexec in apache 2.0 from ports. What I want to know is the best way to have my patch applied each time I compile apache, without too much effort from me? The best way is to get the patch

Re: Permanent apache patch

2007-06-25 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Roland Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Unfortunately most port update tools will delete files that are not in the master tree. In the cases I know of, this will only happen if the same tool had previously known about the file. So just make sure you don't use a filename that was ever in the

Re: Permanent apache patch

2007-06-25 Thread Josh
to run something else. Grant Peel wrote: Curious, what does the patch do? - Original Message - From: [1]Josh To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 5:01 AM Subject: Permanent apache patch Gidday there, I have my own change to suexec in apache

Re: Permanent apache patch

2007-06-25 Thread Josh
This seems to be the case... with csup at least... I would imagine portsnap might bust it though. Thanks :) Lowell Gilbert wrote: Roland Smith [1][EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Unfortunately most port update tools will delete files that are not in the master tree. In the cases I know

Re: Apache, php?

2007-06-21 Thread Jack Barnett
Eric Crist wrote: On Jun 20, 2007, at 8:56 PMJun 20, 2007, Jack Barnett wrote: Ivan Carey wrote: I don't have libphp5.so anywhere in /usr/local (did a find for it). the php5 port is broken? Or do I have to reinstall apache after php5? You need to enable build of the php5 apache extension

Re: Apache, php?

2007-06-21 Thread Jack Barnett
Jack Barnett wrote: Eric Crist wrote: On Jun 20, 2007, at 8:56 PMJun 20, 2007, Jack Barnett wrote: Ivan Carey wrote: I don't have libphp5.so anywhere in /usr/local (did a find for it). the php5 port is broken? Or do I have to reinstall apache after php5? You need

Re: Apache, php?

2007-06-21 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
Jack Barnett wrote: Jack Barnett wrote: Eric Crist wrote: On Jun 20, 2007, at 8:56 PMJun 20, 2007, Jack Barnett wrote: Ivan Carey wrote: I don't have libphp5.so anywhere in /usr/local (did a find for it). the php5 port is broken? Or do I have to reinstall apache after php5

Re: Apache, php?

2007-06-21 Thread Ivan Carey
Jack Barnett wrote: Ivan Carey wrote: Jack Barnett wrote: FreeBSD 6.2 Apache 1.3.37 (from ports) php 5.2.3 (from ports) on the command line doing `php index.php` works. But if I use it though a web browser it just displays the php code. I installed it like this (extensions to) http

Re: Apache, php?

2007-06-21 Thread Jack Barnett
? Or do I have to reinstall apache after php5? You need to enable build of the php5 apache extension when you build the port - it's not enabled by default. HTH Eric Crist thanks. do you know how to do that off hand? :) :) disregarding... rebuilding now

Re: Apache, php?

2007-06-21 Thread Ivan Carey
is broken? Or do I have to reinstall apache after php5? You need to enable build of the php5 apache extension when you build the port - it's not enabled by default. HTH Eric Crist thanks. do you know how to do that off hand? :) :) disregarding

Re: Apache, php?

2007-06-21 Thread doug
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Jack Barnett wrote: doug wrote: On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Jack Barnett wrote: FreeBSD 6.2 Apache 1.3.37 (from ports) php 5.2.3 (from ports) on the command line doing `php index.php` works. But if I use it though a web browser it just displays the php code. I installed

Re: Apache, php?

2007-06-20 Thread doug
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Jack Barnett wrote: FreeBSD 6.2 Apache 1.3.37 (from ports) php 5.2.3 (from ports) on the command line doing `php index.php` works. But if I use it though a web browser it just displays the php code. I installed it like this (extensions to) http://www.mydigitallife.info

Re: Apache, php?

2007-06-20 Thread Jack Barnett
doug wrote: On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Jack Barnett wrote: FreeBSD 6.2 Apache 1.3.37 (from ports) php 5.2.3 (from ports) on the command line doing `php index.php` works. But if I use it though a web browser it just displays the php code. I installed it like this (extensions to) http

Re: Apache, php?

2007-06-20 Thread Jack Barnett
Ivan Carey wrote: Jack Barnett wrote: FreeBSD 6.2 Apache 1.3.37 (from ports) php 5.2.3 (from ports) on the command line doing `php index.php` works. But if I use it though a web browser it just displays the php code. I installed it like this (extensions to) http://www.mydigitallife.info/2006

Re: Apache, php?

2007-06-20 Thread Eric Crist
On Jun 20, 2007, at 8:56 PMJun 20, 2007, Jack Barnett wrote: Ivan Carey wrote: I don't have libphp5.so anywhere in /usr/local (did a find for it). the php5 port is broken? Or do I have to reinstall apache after php5? You need to enable build of the php5 apache extension when you build

Re: Apache, php?

2007-06-19 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 00:04:03 -0500 Jack Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on the command line doing `php index.php` works. But if I use it though a web browser it just displays the php code. enable mod_status and/or mod_info in Apache and double check that the php module is loaded, and what its

Re: Apache, php?

2007-06-19 Thread Ivan Carey
Jack Barnett wrote: FreeBSD 6.2 Apache 1.3.37 (from ports) php 5.2.3 (from ports) on the command line doing `php index.php` works. But if I use it though a web browser it just displays the php code. I installed it like this (extensions to) http://www.mydigitallife.info/2006/04/14/installing

RE: stopping connect attacks in apache

2007-06-19 Thread Bob
On Jun 15, 2007, at 7:49 PM, Bob wrote: Every time my apache server slows down or has denial of service the access log is full this 61.228.122.220 - CONNECT 66.196.97.250:25 HTTP/1.0 200 7034 - - 61.228.122.220 - CONNECT 216.39.53.3:25 HTTP/1.0 200 7034 - - 61.228.122.220 - CONNECT

RE: Apache access log shows these attack requests

2007-06-19 Thread Bob
The replies to my post came back saying that apache defaults to denying CONNECT requests which I was not able to verify. That mod_proxy was causing it. I have mod-proxy commented out. That the CONNECT request is some how being spoofed through php which I was not able to verify. My reading

Re: stopping connect attacks in apache

2007-06-18 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Jun 15, 2007, at 7:49 PM, Bob wrote: Every time my apache server slows down or has denial of service the access log is full this 61.228.122.220 - CONNECT 66.196.97.250:25 HTTP/1.0 200 7034 - - 61.228.122.220 - CONNECT 216.39.53.3:25 HTTP/1.0 200 7034 - - 61.228.122.220 - CONNECT

Apache, php?

2007-06-18 Thread Jack Barnett
FreeBSD 6.2 Apache 1.3.37 (from ports) php 5.2.3 (from ports) on the command line doing `php index.php` works. But if I use it though a web browser it just displays the php code. I installed it like this (extensions to) http://www.mydigitallife.info/2006/04/14/installing-web-server-in-freebsd

stopping connect attacks in apache

2007-06-15 Thread Bob
Every time my apache server slows down or has denial of service the access log is full this 61.228.122.220 - CONNECT 66.196.97.250:25 HTTP/1.0 200 7034 - - 61.228.122.220 - CONNECT 216.39.53.3:25 HTTP/1.0 200 7034 - - 61.228.122.220 - CONNECT 216.39.53.1:25 HTTP/1.0 200 7034 - - 61.228.122.220

apache deining robots.txt 404

2007-06-14 Thread Bob
I just moved FBSD 6.2 / apache-1.3.37.1 into production. In the httpd-access,log I see all the search engines requests for robots.txt getting a 404 code. The previous production world was FBSD 6.0 /apache-1.3.33_2 and all the search engines requests for robots.txt got a 200 code. I use the same

Re: apache deining robots.txt 404

2007-06-14 Thread Karol Kwiatkowski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Bob wrote: I just moved FBSD 6.2 / apache-1.3.37.1 into production. In the httpd-access,log I see all the search engines requests for robots.txt getting a 404 code. The previous production world was FBSD 6.0 /apache-1.3.33_2 and all

Re: Apache access log shows these attack requests

2007-06-14 Thread Ian Smith
, but of course any dynamic content (php or whatever) makes size indeterminate. Bob, check the size shown as served for your ordinary / page requests? My question is why is apache servicing a request for \x04\x01, this is not a valid request in first place. maybe if you show us your apache

RE: Apache access log shows these attack requests

2007-06-13 Thread Bob
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:54:47 -0400 Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Running FBSD 6.2 + apache 13. In the apache access log I see these log records. To me it looks like my apache server is servicing connect requests and get requests to other URL's. Is there some configuration option I can

Re: Apache access log shows these attack requests

2007-06-13 Thread Norberto Meijome
et al ? if they do, then u should be looking for something else other than 7036 in the filesystem...anyway... My question is why is apache servicing a request for \x04\x01, this is not a valid request in first place. maybe if you show us your apache config it would be easier to figure out what

Re: Apache access log shows these attack requests

2007-06-13 Thread jekillen
Hello; I have not understood what the request for - - meant. Thank you, this as shed a lot of light on it. I have seen that fairly frequently in my Apache logs. But on one of my machines that serves as secondary name server I also had Apache running to serve a place holder site

Apache access log shows these attack requests

2007-06-12 Thread Bob
Running FBSD 6.2 + apache 13. In the apache access log I see these log records. To me it looks like my apache server is servicing connect requests and get requests to other URL's. Is there some configuration option I can turn on to stop my server from servicing these bogus requests? 122-124-129

Re: Apache access log shows these attack requests

2007-06-12 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Jun 12, 2007, at 1:54 PM, Bob wrote: Running FBSD 6.2 + apache 13. In the apache access log I see these log records. To me it looks like my apache server is servicing connect requests and get requests to other URL's. Is there some configuration option I can turn on to stop my server

RE: Apache access log shows these attack requests

2007-06-12 Thread Bob
On Jun 12, 2007, at 1:54 PM, Bob wrote: Running FBSD 6.2 + apache 13. In the apache access log I see these log records. To me it looks like my apache server is servicing connect requests and get requests to other URL's. Is there some configuration option I can turn on to stop my server from

Re: Apache access log shows these attack requests

2007-06-12 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Jun 12, 2007, at 2:58 PM, Bob wrote: I all ready have Apache mod_proxy commented out in httpd.conf and there is no php stuff installed in system. Your logfile lines seemed to be oddly truncated, so it's a bit hard to tell, but it sure seemed like some of the requests you showed were

Re: Apache access log shows these attack requests

2007-06-12 Thread Ian Smith
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:54:47 -0400 Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Running FBSD 6.2 + apache 13. In the apache access log I see these log records. To me it looks like my apache server is servicing connect requests and get requests to other URL's. Is there some configuration option I can

Re: Does any verson of Freebsd includes the apache package?

2007-06-11 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 09:54:07AM +0800, goole blowfish wrote: Dear friends, I have download the freebsd FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE. When I install, I can't find the apache package in this installtion package. Does any verson of Freebsd includes the apache package? First, learn about

Re: Does any verson of Freebsd includes the apache package?

2007-06-11 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 09:54:07AM +0800, goole blowfish wrote: Dear friends, I have download the freebsd FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE. When I install, I can't find the apache package in this installtion package. Does any verson of Freebsd includes the apache package? One more thing that can

Re: [freebsd-questions] Best way to add SSL to Apache 1.3.37

2007-06-11 Thread Patrick Baldwin
Norberto Meijome wrote: On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:03:31 -0400 Patrick Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm running 6.2-RELEASE-p4, and Apache 1.3.37. I'd like to add SSL support, but I'm not sure of the best way to go about it. may I ask why are you using Apache 1.3.x ? I think Apache

Re: [freebsd-questions] Best way to add SSL to Apache 1.3.37

2007-06-11 Thread Patrick Baldwin
Olivier Nicole wrote: [snip] configuration? If both options are possible, is one better than the other? I'd prefer not to have to re-do my apache install, but if there's some compelling reason I should, I'm interested in knowing it. You would have to modify the httpd.conf to activate SSL

Re: Php5 port and Apache Module

2007-06-10 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Christopher Hilton wrote: Jonathan Horne wrote: [...] Everyone seems to be misunderstanding my question. I'm aware of how to build mod_php5. I'm curious about why the default configuration builds php5 as a standalone CLI and CGI rather than as an apache module. I'm assuming

Re: Php5 port and Apache Module

2007-06-10 Thread Ian Smith
On Sat, 09 Jun 2007 21:45:03 -0400 Christopher Hilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jonathan Horne wrote: Bob wrote: The php4 php5 port apache module used to be default before FBSD 6.0. Around 6.0 may have been the timeline for this change, but it affected users of 5.4 and 5.5 too; one 5.5

Re: Php5 port and Apache Module

2007-06-10 Thread Matthew Seaman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Ian Smith wrote: Around 6.0 may have been the timeline for this change, but it affected users of 5.4 and 5.5 too; one 5.5-STABLE here. I ran into this updating phpMyAdmin last year, which also enforced upgrading from php4 to php5 -

Re: Php5 port and Apache Module

2007-06-10 Thread Ian Smith
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Matthew Seaman wrote: Ian Smith wrote: Around 6.0 may have been the timeline for this change, but it affected users of 5.4 and 5.5 too; one 5.5-STABLE here. I ran into this updating phpMyAdmin last year, which also enforced upgrading from php4 to php5 -

Re: Php5 port and Apache Module

2007-06-10 Thread Matthew Seaman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Ian Smith wrote: Anyway, water under the bridge; phpMyAdmin 2.9.1 works fine, and I soon have another big upgrade to do (patiently awaiting xorg 7 packages :) I take it you are aware of:

Re: Php5 port and Apache Module

2007-06-10 Thread Ian Smith
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Matthew Seaman wrote: Ian Smith wrote: Anyway, water under the bridge; phpMyAdmin 2.9.1 works fine, and I soon have another big upgrade to do (patiently awaiting xorg 7 packages :) I take it you are aware of:

Re: Php5 port and Apache Module

2007-06-10 Thread Christopher Hilton
Miroslav Lachman wrote: I guess that mod_php5 depends on Apache and maintainer don't want this big dependency. The second is - if it will depends on Apache of some version (eg. 1.3) it will be broken with another version (2.0 and 2.2). It apply for binary packages. If somebody is compiling

Does any verson of Freebsd includes the apache package?

2007-06-10 Thread goole blowfish
Dear friends, I have download the freebsd FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE. When I install, I can't find the apache package in this installtion package. Does any verson of Freebsd includes the apache package? Best Regards, FredZhang ___ freebsd-questions

Re: Does any verson of Freebsd includes the apache package?

2007-06-10 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 09:54:07AM +0800, goole blowfish wrote: Dear friends, I have download the freebsd FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE. When I install, I can't find the apache package in this installtion package. Does any verson of Freebsd includes the apache package? Every version of FreeBD

Re: Does any verson of Freebsd includes the apache package?

2007-06-10 Thread Eric Crist
On Jun 10, 2007, at 8:54 PMJun 10, 2007, goole blowfish wrote: Dear friends, I have download the freebsd FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE. When I install, I can't find the apache package in this installtion package. Does any verson of Freebsd includes the apache package? In a manner of speaking

Re: Does any verson of Freebsd includes the apache package?

2007-06-10 Thread Rico Secada
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:54:07 +0800 goole blowfish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear friends, I have download the freebsd FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE. When I install, I can't find the apache package in this installtion package. Does any verson of Freebsd includes the apache package? Something

Php5 port and Apache Module

2007-06-09 Thread Christopher Hilton
I can see that if I build the php5 port it defaults to CLI and CGI mode but the Apache module is not built. Am I wrong when I assume that the Apache Module will have the best performance? I guess that I'd just like to understand the engineering decisions behind the default in the port's

RE: Php5 port and Apache Module

2007-06-09 Thread Bob
The php4 php5 port apache module used to be default before FBSD 6.0. Many people before you on this list have wanted the php4/5 apache module turned back on as default but so far the port maintainer has not done anything in any way of justifying removing the apache module from the default setting

Re: Php5 port and Apache Module

2007-06-09 Thread Christopher Hilton
Bob wrote: The php4 php5 port apache module used to be default before FBSD 6.0. Many people before you on this list have wanted the php4/5 apache module turned back on as default but so far the port maintainer has not done anything in any way of justifying removing the apache module from

Re: Php5 port and Apache Module

2007-06-09 Thread Jonathan Horne
Bob wrote: The php4 php5 port apache module used to be default before FBSD 6.0. Many people before you on this list have wanted the php4/5 apache module turned back on as default but so far the port maintainer has not done anything in any way of justifying removing the apache module from

Re: Php5 port and Apache Module

2007-06-09 Thread Christopher Hilton
Jonathan Horne wrote: Bob wrote: The php4 php5 port apache module used to be default before FBSD 6.0. Many people before you on this list have wanted the php4/5 apache module turned back on as default but so far the port maintainer has not done anything in any way of justifying removing

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >