On 28 November 2010 20:56, Grant Peel gp...@thenetnow.com wrote:
Openwebmail 1.53
-Grant
-Original Message- From: Jim Pazarena
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 2:42 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Web mail for not local domains.
On 2010-11-28 9:36 AM, Jorge
accounts that are hosted under other domains with other ISP's .
Actually no problem under they eudora mail client, but the idea is
that when they out in conference or so they also can have access to
the accounts under the freebsd server and the other provider.
Thanks in advance for your comments
. No gmail, hotmail or so, but POP3 accounts that
are hosted under other domains with other ISP's . Actually no problem
under they eudora mail client, but the idea is that when they out in
conference or so they also can have access to the accounts under the
freebsd server and the other provider
. No gmail, hotmail or so, but POP3
accounts that are hosted under other domains with other ISP's .
Actually no problem under they eudora mail client, but the idea is
that when they out in conference or so they also can have access to
the accounts under the freebsd server and the other provider
On 2010-11-28 9:36 AM, Jorge Biquez wrote:
Hello all.
I was wondering if you can suggest the best application you consider for the
following.
roundcube
--
Jim Pazarena fqu...@paz.bz
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Openwebmail 1.53
-Grant
-Original Message-
From: Jim Pazarena
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 2:42 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Web mail for not local domains.
On 2010-11-28 9:36 AM, Jorge Biquez wrote:
Hello all.
I was wondering if you can suggest the best
I am using Sendmail on a FreeBSD7.0 server as a mail relay for some of
our servers. These servers relay messages to both internal recipients
and external customers. I need to be able to relay mail destined to our
internal domain recipients to our corporate mail servers but relay
everything else
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:15:02 -0500, greg.st...@sungard.com wrote:
I am using Sendmail on a FreeBSD7.0 server as a mail relay for some of
our servers. These servers relay messages to both internal recipients
and external customers. I need to be able to relay mail destined to
our internal
In the last episode (Feb 06), greg.st...@sungard.com said:
I am using Sendmail on a FreeBSD7.0 server as a mail relay for some of our
servers. These servers relay messages to both internal recipients and
external customers. I need to be able to relay mail destined to our
internal domain
greg.st...@sungard.com wrote:
I am using Sendmail on a FreeBSD7.0 server as a mail relay for some of
our servers. These servers relay messages to both internal recipients
and external customers. I need to be able to relay mail destined to our
internal domain recipients to our corporate mail
, 2009 2:03 PM
To: Stark, Greg
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Sendmail to Relay different domains to different hosts
greg.st...@sungard.com wrote:
I am using Sendmail on a FreeBSD7.0 server as a mail relay for some of
our servers. These servers relay messages to both internal
] On Behalf Of
greg.st...@sungard.com
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 2:10 PM
To: st...@ibctech.ca
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Sendmail to Relay different domains to different hosts
Great! I will give this a try.
If I put a single entry into the mailertable for the corporate domain
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:09:49 -0500, greg.st...@sungard.com wrote:
Great! I will give this a try.
If I put a single entry into the mailertable for the corporate domain
would everything else default to the smarthost defined in sendmail.cf?
Yes. If you want *everything* to be handled through
Please, any thoughts here?
Best regards.
Robi.
Roberto Nunnari wrote:
Hi.
I'd like to know what are the best practices for implementing
email hosting for several domains. The service is accessible
via pop/imap/webmail
Apart from that, I'd like to ask for comments on the
actual comfiguration
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:29:29 +0100
Roberto Nunnari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, everything works fine, but I'm a bit concerned with the
webmail login.. I'd like [EMAIL PROTECTED] to login with a
username equal to the email, but as the authentication in
horde is handled by imp, I'm not sure
--- Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:29:29 +0100
Roberto Nunnari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, everything works fine, but I'm a bit
concerned with the
webmail login.. I'd like [EMAIL PROTECTED] to login
with a
username equal to the email, but as the
This is indeed how squirrelmail works, and I've found
it to be incredibly easy to roll squirrelmail out.
sqwebmail is excellent webmail software
Since people will be sending authentication
credentials, you may want to set it up on an
SSL-enabled web host so that they are not sent in the
Hi Norberto.
Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:29:29 +0100
Roberto Nunnari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, everything works fine, but I'm a bit concerned with the
webmail login.. I'd like [EMAIL PROTECTED] to login with a
username equal to the email, but as the authentication in
You could have your imapd authenticate against
something other than /etc/passwd, and map the
usernames in said other authentication mechanism to
the appropriate mail boxes. There's no real reason
nowadays to have a system user for every email user.
Generally speaking, what you want likely
Hi.
I'd like to know what are the best practices for implementing
email hosting for several domains. The service is accessible
via pop/imap/webmail
Apart from that, I'd like to ask for comments on the
actual comfiguration..
The system is already configured and running as follows:
# uname -rms
Hi,
Maxim Khitrov wrote:
On Dec 30, 2007 12:31 PM, Darren Spruell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 30, 2007 9:52 AM, Maxim Khitrov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I then installed dnsmasq, which is able to read domain info from the
hosts file. Just for the fun of it, I loaded domains from all
Darren Spruell wrote:
On Dec 28, 2007 8:49 AM, Kevin Kinsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the absence of egress filtering on the firewall, that
would definitely be an advantage. Does anyone use BIND
for filtering in a small to medium business environment
then? How does it perform?
Performs
similar. I didn't research too hard, but
figured the only way to use Bind would be to make my server authoritative for
all those domains, which meant a huge config file and potential overhead, as
well as
possibly breaking access to desirable servers in the domains.
So hosts seemed easier
On Dec 30, 2007 9:52 AM, Maxim Khitrov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was trying to do something similar. I didn't research too hard, but
figured the only way to use Bind would be to make my server authoritative
for all those domains, which meant a huge config file and potential
overhead
those domains, which meant a huge config file and potential
overhead, as well as
possibly breaking access to desirable servers in the domains.
So hosts seemed easier, but apparently Bind never looks at hosts. I did
find that Squid (which I already had installed and in limited use) has
Olivier Nicole wrote:
Again, I'm not trying to convince you otherwise or say that using
BIND is a bad idea. It's just that I'm curious because we use
Squid for this sort of thing, and I was wondering why BIND instead?
I think another issue is that Squid will only filter HTTP/FTP
connections,
On Dec 28, 2007 8:49 AM, Kevin Kinsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Olivier Nicole wrote:
Again, I'm not trying to convince you otherwise or say that using
BIND is a bad idea. It's just that I'm curious because we use
Squid for this sort of thing, and I was wondering why BIND instead?
I
way to use Bind would be to make my server authoritative for all those domains, which meant a huge config file and potential overhead, as well as
possibly breaking access to desirable servers in the domains.
So hosts seemed easier, but apparently Bind never looks at hosts. I did find
that Squid
Hi,
the guys seem to have some humour:
Linux/Unix/Mac OSX
Remove the extension and save this to your /etc directory. Considering
unix is a server-based OS with a complex permission structure you'll
probably want to just append your hosts file instead of overwriting it.
OSX can use the
Hello,
I'm currently setting up a new firewall for my home network using
FreeBSD 7. The firewall will also act as our local name server
(authoritative for the local domain, and caching for everything else).
One of the things I'd like to do with it is use BIND to block various
undesirable domains
like to do with it is use BIND to block various
undesirable domains (ad servers, malicious sites, etc.). The plan is
to have a separate BIND config file which is included in the main one.
In that file I map all the blocked domains to either the empty zone or
perhaps my local web server that's
like to do with it is use BIND to block various
undesirable domains (ad servers, malicious sites, etc.). The plan is
to have a separate BIND config file which is included in the main one.
In that file I map all the blocked domains to either the empty zone or
perhaps my local web server that's
Maxim Khitrov wrote:
into a BIND config file myself. Just need good sources. What are your
recommendations?
I keep a small but potent list of undesirables as described here...
http://mark.foster.cc/wiki/index.php/Trackers
--
Said one park ranger, 'There is considerable overlap between the
various
undesirable domains (ad servers, malicious sites, etc.). The plan is
to have a separate BIND config file which is included in the main one.
Just a question, and I'm not trying to cast doubt on your plan; I'm
curious why using BIND for this purpose instead of a proxy, which is
a more typical
setting up a new firewall for my home network using
FreeBSD 7. The firewall will also act as our local name server
(authoritative for the local domain, and caching for everything else).
One of the things I'd like to do with it is use BIND to block various
undesirable domains (ad servers, malicious
Has bind a visible advantage in the response time?
Maybe not in response time, but certainly in centralisation: you only
maintain one DNS instead of every machine.
Olivier
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Hi,
Olivier Nicole wrote:
Has bind a visible advantage in the response time?
Maybe not in response time, but certainly in centralisation: you only
maintain one DNS instead of every machine.
this is obvious to me too.
I would not like to use bind for filtering except in larger
else).
One of the things I'd like to do with it is use BIND to block various
undesirable domains (ad servers, malicious sites, etc.). The plan is
to have a separate BIND config file which is included in the main one.
Just a question, and I'm not trying to cast doubt on your plan; I'm
curious
domain, and caching for everything else).
One of the things I'd like to do with it is use BIND to block various
undesirable domains (ad servers, malicious sites, etc.). The plan is
to have a separate BIND config file which is included in the main one.
In that file I map all the blocked
Again, I'm not trying to convince you otherwise or say that using
BIND is a bad idea. It's just that I'm curious because we use
Squid for this sort of thing, and I was wondering why BIND instead?
I think another issue is that Squid will only filter HTTP/FTP
connections, while DNS would allow
We just put our replacement DNS servers online, djbdns replacing Bind.
In testing with the few domains we have moved to the new servers we
began getting intermittent failures for some clients.
It is only dot org domains, checking deeper it ain't us. If I do a
domain query from dnsstuff for any
On Oct 22, 2007, at 11:43 AM, DAve wrote:
It is only dot org domains, checking deeper it ain't us. If I do a
domain query from dnsstuff for any org, I sometimes get nothing but
name
server records. This happens when the root servers refer the query to
TLSx.Ultradns.net.
I see ultradns
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:43:06 -0500
DAve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We just put our replacement DNS servers online, djbdns replacing Bind.
In testing with the few domains we have moved to the new servers we
began getting intermittent failures for some clients.
It is only dot org domains
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 01:10:49 +0100
RW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:43:06 -0500
DAve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We just put our replacement DNS servers online, djbdns replacing
Bind. In testing with the few domains we have moved to the new
servers we began getting
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Oct 22, 2007, at 11:43 AM, DAve wrote:
It is only dot org domains, checking deeper it ain't us. If I do a
domain query from dnsstuff for any org, I sometimes get nothing but name
server records. This happens when the root servers refer the query to
TLSx.Ultradns.net
Hello!
A silly question probably. How do I get FreeBSD, or Postfix, to give me
all e-mails sent to me@all the domains in my nameserver? Can
/etc/aliases do this, or something else?
Thanks guys,
Kyrre
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
look at
/usr/local/etc/postfix/virtual
and man 5 virtual
it will explain how to handle virtual domains and direct anything to any
mail account you want
Kyrre Nygård wrote:
Hello!
A silly question probably. How do I get FreeBSD, or Postfix, to give
me all e-mails sent to me@all
Eric wrote:
look at
/usr/local/etc/postfix/virtual
and man 5 virtual
it will explain how to handle virtual domains and direct anything to
any mail account you want
I really appreciate it man, thanks a lot!
-- Kyrre
___
freebsd-questions
Eric wrote:
look at
/usr/local/etc/postfix/virtual
and man 5 virtual
it will explain how to handle virtual domains and direct anything to
any mail account you want
All I had to do was to add the domain to mydestinations!
Thanks again
Hi all,
I have FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #1: Wed Jul 25 authenticating successfully against
active directory via samba's winbindd(8). I need to manage samba shares via
FreeBSD ACLs and CIFS ACLs. From my reading of setfacl(1) I should be able to
set group permissions using the syntax of
Hi all,
I have FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #1: Wed Jul 25 authenticating successfully against
active directory via samba's winbindd(8). I need to manage samba shares via
FreeBSD ACLs and CIFS ACLs. From my reading of setfacl(1) I should be able to
set group permissions using the syntax of
On Jan 6, 2006, at 1:42 PM, Ceri Davies wrote:
On 6 Jan 2006, at 14:02, Playnet wrote:
Hello freebsd-questions,
I have 3 domains, e.g. dom1.spb.ru, dom2.spb.ru, dom3.spb.ru
and 1 external (inet) IP.
How i can setup this?
As database i use LDAP..
Read the exim specification available
Hello freebsd-questions,
I have 3 domains, e.g. dom1.spb.ru, dom2.spb.ru, dom3.spb.ru
and 1 external (inet) IP.
How i can setup this?
As database i use LDAP..
--
Best regards,
Playnet mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd
On 6 Jan 2006, at 14:02, Playnet wrote:
Hello freebsd-questions,
I have 3 domains, e.g. dom1.spb.ru, dom2.spb.ru, dom3.spb.ru
and 1 external (inet) IP.
How i can setup this?
As database i use LDAP..
Read the exim specification available under the Documentation section
at exim.org
section of hostname to non-existent
domains
Ruben Bloemgarten [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all,
Could anyone let me know what's misconfigured here:
When I ping from say server2 # ping jkhdsfkhdsafhjsahfdhksa.com I get the
following reply :
PING
(on existing domains it does
resolve correctly), it would seem that something is happening after
hosts-dns- (not using nis).
Isn't this just the search parameter for resolv.conf(5)?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
: ip.natted.lan server2 server2.mydomain2.com server2.mydomain2.com.
Server1: ip.static.wan server1 server1.mydomain1.com server2.mydomain2.com.
Although, as dns has already taken place (on existing domains it does
resolve correctly), it would seem that something is happening after
hosts-dns- (not using
On 11/9/05, Gayn Winters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm installing sendmail.8.13.3 on FBSD 5.4 on node.domain1.com.
I've configured /etc/mail/local-host-names to accept mail for
domain1.com and domain2.com.
My user names look like bob.domain1.com and (a different Bob)
bob.domain2.com.
I'm installing sendmail.8.13.3 on FBSD 5.4 on node.domain1.com.
I've configured /etc/mail/local-host-names to accept mail for
domain1.com and domain2.com.
My user names look like bob.domain1.com and (a different Bob)
bob.domain2.com.
Inside /etc/mail/virtusertable I map
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ahnjoan Amous [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 6:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Masquerading Virtual domains in sendmail
On 11/9/05, Gayn Winters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm
Hi,
I need your help please.
On my personal FreeBSD server connected to an ISP with static IP address,
I'm planning to setup several websites with their own sub-domains from my
main domain as shown below. I just want to know some answers to my questions
before I start.
Main domain
On 11/6/05, Edwin D. Vinas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I need your help please.
On my personal FreeBSD server connected to an ISP with static IP address,
I'm planning to setup several websites with their own sub-domains from my
main domain as shown below. I just want to know some answers
in conjunction with a web hosting package or something
(123-reg.co.uk will definitely work as I use them for a similar setup to
the one you describe).
2) Is it correct that through my local DNS server, I can add sub hosts (sub1
to sub3) without anymore registering those sub domains and pay for them in
my
Edwin D. Vinas wrote:
Hi,
I need your help please.
On my personal FreeBSD server connected to an ISP with static IP address,
I'm planning to setup several websites with their own sub-domains from my
main domain as shown below. I just want to know some answers to my questions
before I start
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 02:01:00PM -0600, Chris wrote:
Your fisrt and hardest roadblock will be getting your provider to allow
YOU to be authoritive for the IP or IP's you use.
That's not necessary - I host the DNS, web sites and mail for a dozen
different domains off an IP address for which I
Paul Waring wrote:
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 02:01:00PM -0600, Chris wrote:
Your fisrt and hardest roadblock will be getting your provider to allow
YOU to be authoritive for the IP or IP's you use.
That's not necessary - I host the DNS, web sites and mail for a dozen
different domains off
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 04:41:06PM -0600, Chris wrote:
It may not be necessary - but to do it right... I for one like to have
mu IP's resolve both forward and reverse. It's just professional looking
as a whole.
I like to have my IPs resolve both ways too, but try finding an ISP who
will either
On Nov 6, 2005, at 4:45 PM, Paul Waring wrote:
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 04:41:06PM -0600, Chris wrote:
It may not be necessary - but to do it right... I for one like to
have
mu IP's resolve both forward and reverse. It's just professional
looking
as a whole.
I like to have my IPs resolve
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 06:22:58PM -0600, Eric F Crist wrote:
Actually, my ISP, ipHouse.net is one who's willing to configure
reverse DNS for you. Qwest Communications is another one who'll
setup DNS for you, and they're HUGE. If you choose to go with
ipHouse, tell them I sent you --
-questions@freebsd.org
cc
Subject
POP server that supports virtual users/domains (other than dovecot)?
Hi all -
Looking for recommendations for a POP server that
supportts
virtual users and domains and preferably hooks into PostgreSQL. dovecot
does this and I'm looking
Hi all -
Looking for recommendations for a POP server that supportts
virtual users and domains and preferably hooks into PostgreSQL. dovecot
does this and I'm looking at it now, but it's got a lot of IMAP stuff that
I will never ever use (really I won't).
Anyone have recommendations
of the information contained in this message nor for
any delay in its receipt.
DH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/11/2005 06:25 PM
To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
cc
Subject
Internal vs. External domains and e-mail
Hello;
We are going to migrate to an Interal Windows 2003
in this message nor for
any delay in its receipt.
DH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/11/2005 06:25 PM
To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
cc
Subject
Internal vs. External domains and e-mail
Hello;
We are going to migrate to an Interal Windows 2003
AD
Hello;
We are going to migrate to an Interal Windows 2003 AD
structure which will also entail changing our Internal
DNS to a non-routeable domain.
Currently we are using qmail qmail-scanner to relay
mail to an Internal Exchange Server.
mydomain.com
I realize this question is probably best served by the sendmail mailing list,
but whereas I've added the Spam Assassin filter, I'm hoping to find a larger
community here that is running FreeBSD + sendmail + SpamAssassin who
have handled this, so I don't have to ask the question in 3 places :)
The
Kevin Kinsey wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of bazzoola
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 5:55 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: hostname and domains
Greetings,
I have Three workstations all of them are pretty much setup
Greetings,
I have Three workstations all of them are pretty much setup the same
way. All of them use DHCP and all of them connect to the same server (I
do not know what is it running as of now)
The first workstation is Windows XP. It receives its IP and hostname
correct basically I get
: hostname and domains
Greetings,
I have Three workstations all of them are pretty much setup the same
way. All of them use DHCP and all of them connect to the same server
(I
do not know what is it running as of now)
The first workstation is Windows XP. It receives its IP and hostname
correct basically
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of bazzoola
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 5:55 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: hostname and domains
Greetings,
I have Three workstations all of them are pretty much setup the same
way. All of them
Is there an easy way to run multiple domains off of one sendmail client
without using jails? We're thinking about replacing mailsite from
rockliffe with a unix solution instead. The problem is we need an easy
way to run independent mail domains that each have their own accounts
and can access
Loren M. Lang wrote:
Is there an easy way to run multiple domains off of one sendmail client
without using jails?
Of course, start here:
http://www.sendmail.org/virtual-hosting.html
You can do fancier things if you use a smarter LDA, such as procmail.
In other words, we don't want customers
Hi Pat,
Feb 4 19:57:59 cantona postfix/virtual[579]: CA35333C1D:
to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=virtual, delay=0, status=deferred
(mailbox /var/mail/vhosts/javaspot.net/pergesu: cannot create file
exclusively: No such file or directory)
Shouldn't PostFix create the vhosts/javaspot.net directory and
I got it working, and managed to get courier-imap working as well.
The only problem (big problem?) is that I had to chmod 777 /var/mail
to get it all working together. I'm trying to figure out what
permissions I can give it to ensure that postfix and courier-imap can
work together...but neither
By the way, the problem appears to be solely permissions-based. When
I've got normal-looking permissions on /var/mail, postfix gives that
error, cannot create file. Courier-IMAP says, imapd: chdir
javaspot.net/pergesu: No such file or directory chmod 777 /var/mail
and they both work fine. But
Hi Pat,
Pat Maddox wrote:
By the way, the problem appears to be solely permissions-based. When
I've got normal-looking permissions on /var/mail, postfix gives that
error, cannot create file. Courier-IMAP says, imapd: chdir
javaspot.net/pergesu: No such file or directory chmod 777 /var/mail
and
Volker, thanks for all your help. I got everything running smoothly.
For courier-imap, I set the uid and gid in the authmysqlrc file. But
I needed to set the uid and gid in both postfix and courier...so your
instructions helped greatly. Thanks a lot!
Pat
On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 14:36:19
Pat Maddox wrote:
By the way, the problem appears to be solely permissions-based. When
I've got normal-looking permissions on /var/mail, postfix gives that
error, cannot create file. Courier-IMAP says, imapd: chdir
javaspot.net/pergesu: No such file or directory chmod 777 /var/mail
and they
I'm trying to set up postfix for virtual domains. Apparently the
config is mostly correct, because it looks like PostFix is trying to
complete delivery of the mail. I get this in my /var/log/maillog
file:
Feb 4 19:57:59 cantona postfix/virtual[579]: CA35333C1D:
to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay
From: Wayne Pascoe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2. Setup a webmail solution. I'm currently using Squirrelmail for users
that exist in /etc/passwd (not very many!), and am considering a
migration to Horde/IMP. Near as I can tell though it's not the webmail
client that matters, but the imap
appreciate any advice
on pointers to help me achieve these:
1. Setup SMTP Auth with Exim so that they can use my boxes for outgoing
SMTP. This would allow me to setup SPF on their domains as well, which
would be a plus.
2. Setup a webmail solution. I'm currently using Squirrelmail for users
that exist
I am having a big problem with slow internal DNS (bind 8 on FreeBSD 4.9).
If we do a query against a local domain (our DNS server is authoratative)
then the response is fast. If we do a query against anything in bind's
cache the resp. is fast. If we do a query for a new non-local domain then
the
Here is a part of maillog:
Mar 11 16:53:42 sokol sendmail[245]: i2BBrgV00245: ruleset=check_rcpt, arg1=[EMAIL
PROTECTED], relay=vabra [192.168.1.66],
reject=550 5.7.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Relaying denied
Mar 11 16:53:42 sokol sendmail[245]: i2BBrgV00245: from=[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=541,
reject=550 5.7.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Relaying denied
see /etc/mail/access.sample, read the README, read the handbook, read the
FAQ at http://www.sendmail.org/faq/.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
HI, i want to have my personal domain not for buisness but for educational use. I am
not that familiar with freebsd but i know somethings. I need my own doamin such as
www.chetcuti.mt . can i set up my freebsd to do this so when they look up
chetcuti.mt they see my ip without registering
HI, i want to have my personal domain not for buisness but for educational use. I am
not that familiar with freebsd but i know somethings. I need my own doamin such as
www.chetcuti.mt . can i set up my freebsd to do this so when they look up chetcuti.mt
they see my ip without registering for a
On Wednesday 07 January 2004 06:06 pm, Aeden wrote:
HI, i want to have my personal domain not for buisness but for educational
use. I am not that familiar with freebsd but i know somethings. I need my
own doamin such as www.chetcuti.mt . can i set up my freebsd to do this so
when they look up
Hey all- this is something I've looked for a good solution for for some
time, and I'm sure someone else has already worked out. Any ideas
appreciated.
The scenario:
I have entirely too many email addresses, several of which from domains
that are mine, but others that are not mine, but am
Hi,
I am having a problem with awstats I am currently using 5.9, I have set
up the following dir
/etc/awstats/
I have six domainsand I have tried to set up the conf from the
model like the in instruction
awstats.mysite1.conf
awstats.mysite2.conf
awstats.mysite3.conf
Hello everybody,
Iam on FreeBSD 4.8-R, I have ubimiaw Web mail client installed, but its
usless,
It cannot take virtual Users and read the Mail inbox/dir for it plus
diffrent bad effects.
I want to have installed a web mail client which can read the virtual
domains/users.
what should
a Web Admin package for exim (?), but its easy enought to configure using
command line. I never touch my exim.conf file. I only edit a pop3-domains
file, which contains domains that i pop for, and an aliases file for each
domain that i host for mail forwarding etc.
The way it would work on my system
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
