there a possibility to retrieve that FreeBSD Installation which
> > is overwritten by Linux installation.
>
> In most cases: What has been overwritten is lost.
>
> But: What has "only" been disallocated (data still on disk)
> can _sometimes_ be recovered.
>
>
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 07:28:49 +, KK CHN wrote:
> List,
>
> I accidentally installed a Linux variant(mint OS) on my Harddisk
> where FreeBSD is installed( which contains my data).
>
> Is there a possibility to retrieve that FreeBSD Installation which
> is
List,
I accidentally installed a Linux variant(mint OS) on my Harddisk
where FreeBSD is installed( which contains my data).
Is there a possibility to retrieve that FreeBSD Installation which
is overwritten by Linux installation.
Any hints welcome!
Thanks
Chn
On Sat, 03-Nov-2012 at 23:34:48 +0100, jb wrote:
> Andre Albsmeier siemens.com> writes:
>
> > ...
> > However, when pressing F3, the system of slice 2(!) is
> > loaded. This is due to the fact that boot1 always loads
> > the first active FreeBSD slice ;-(.
> > ...
> > Is there no chance t
On Sat, 03-Nov-2012 at 18:46:04 +0100, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Andre Albsmeier
> mailto:andre.albsme...@siemens.com>> wrote:
> For various reasons I have to use this disk layout:
>
> One harddisk with MBR and 3 slices on a i386 box:
>
> Slice 1: Windo
jb gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> I do not know the story of active slice in FreeBSD, but I know that neither
> Windows nor Linux require active partitions (in their jargon) to boot from any
> more.
> Perhaps it is time to review this requirement in FreeBSD and drop it if
> possible.
> Opinions are
Andre Albsmeier siemens.com> writes:
> ...
> However, when pressing F3, the system of slice 2(!) is
> loaded. This is due to the fact that boot1 always loads
> the first active FreeBSD slice ;-(.
> ...
> Is there no chance to actually honour the fact that F3 was
> pressed and boot from sl
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
> For various reasons I have to use this disk layout:
>
> One harddisk with MBR and 3 slices on a i386 box:
>
> Slice 1: Windows XP :-(
> Slice 2: FreeBSD 7.4-STABLE V1
> Slice 3: FreeBSD 7.4-STABLE V2
>
> The MBR is configured as:
>
> option
For various reasons I have to use this disk layout:
One harddisk with MBR and 3 slices on a i386 box:
Slice 1: Windows XP :-(
Slice 2: FreeBSD 7.4-STABLE V1
Slice 3: FreeBSD 7.4-STABLE V2
The MBR is configured as:
options=packet,noupdate,nosetdrv
default_selection=F2 (Slice 2)
When booting, I
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sat Dec 24 23:42:28 2011
> Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2011 00:38:04 -0500
> From: heat...@trans-world.org
> To:
> Subject: Freebsd installation problem with 3ware 8506-4LP - storage
> controller (RAID)
>
> Hello, we tried to instal Fr
Hello, we tried to instal Freebsd with my 3ware 8506-4LP - storage
controller (RAID)
and it seems freebsd does not support my raid card could you please
tell me how to fox this problem?
Here below ismy data center message I got after they tried to instal
freebsd on my server,
regards, Miss Rive
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011, Jason Usher wrote:
I'm going to run FreeBSD off of a flash drive on some older mac mini systems.
Before I begin, though, I'd like some advice on the best USB thumb drives for
this.
These systems will be deployed and left in place, hopefully for YEARS
in a remote, inacces
Hi--
On Oct 17, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Jason Usher wrote:
> Are they all the same, or are there some USB flash choices that are more
> durable and fault tolerant than others ?
There's fairly significant differences:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flash_memory#Write_endurance
SLC NOR flash tends to
I'm going to run FreeBSD off of a flash drive on some older mac mini systems.
Before I begin, though, I'd like some advice on the best USB thumb drives for
this.
These systems will be deployed and left in place, hopefully for YEARS in a
remote, inaccessible location. So, I'd like to make sure
I tried responding to an off-list message. Delivery failed for some
reason.
I just don't want the sender of the message to which I tried to reply to
think I'm ignoring him, so I elected to send this to the list.
Thanks for your patience.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://o
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 09:09:52PM +, Devin Teske wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 13:39 -0700, Chad Perrin wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 01:57:38PM -0800, Devin Teske wrote:
> > >
> > > You're going to have to resort to things that aren't touched during a
> > > system upgrade if you wan
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 13:39 -0700, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 01:57:38PM -0800, Devin Teske wrote:
> >
> > You're going to have to resort to things that aren't touched during a
> > system upgrade if you want to find out the `true' answer as to when the
> > box was first ... what
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 01:57:38PM -0800, Devin Teske wrote:
>
> You're going to have to resort to things that aren't touched during a
> system upgrade if you want to find out the `true' answer as to when the
> box was first ... what? partitioned? newfs'd? clue me in here.
>
> What _is_ the defin
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:56 AM, Alexandr Sushko
wrote:
> Try to use not ls -l, but ls -lc. It will show you file creation time.
>
>
> ls -lcd /bin/, for example
>
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1024 Dec 10 00:31 /bin/
>
>
I ran this and the earliest date I found was Oct 12, 2008 which seems to be
a
On 01/13/2011 11:28 PM, David Demelier wrote:
Hello folks,
I'm just guessing if there is a way to know a FreeBSD installation
date. We can't look after the uname -a ident since an update of the
FreeBSD kernel is possible.
I think searching a file absolutely not touched ever in
On 14/01/2011 19:46, Carl Johnson wrote:
Chip Camden writes:
Quoth Carl Chave on Friday, 14 January 2011:
I'd suggest looking at the Btimes of top level directories
stat -f "%SB %N" /*
Or how about just / as this ~15 minutes earlier than most of the
remaining top level directories
sodser
Chip Camden writes:
> Quoth Carl Chave on Friday, 14 January 2011:
>> > I'd suggest looking at the Btimes of top level directories
>> >
>> > stat -f "%SB %N" /*
>>
>> Or how about just / as this ~15 minutes earlier than most of the
>> remaining top level directories
>>
>>
>> sodserve# stat -f
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 07:32:13 -0800
Chip Camden wrote:
> > sodserve# stat -f "%SB %N" /*
> > Jan 9 04:54:21 2011 /COPYRIGHT
> > Jan 9 04:54:21 2011 /bin
> > Jan 9 04:54:21 2011 /boot
> > Dec 31 18:59:59 1969 /dev
> > Jan 9 04:54:21 2011 /etc
> > Jan 9 04:54:21 2011 /lib
> > Jan 9 04:54:21 20
On 14 January 2011 15:37, Chip Camden wrote:
> Quoth n j on Friday, 14 January 2011:
> > >>> I'm just guessing if there is a way to know a FreeBSD installation
> date.
> > >>> We can't look after the uname -a ident since an update of the FreeBSD
Quoth n j on Friday, 14 January 2011:
> >>> I'm just guessing if there is a way to know a FreeBSD installation date.
> >>> We can't look after the uname -a ident since an update of the FreeBSD
> >>> kernel is possible.
>
> How about looking a
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Carl Johnson wrote:
> How about /var/empty:
>
> % ls -ldo /var/empty/
> dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel schg 512 Jul 18 19:16 /var/empty/
>
> It can be changed, but doesn't look likely.
>
>
Ivan's e-mail I think might be a little more accurate
ch...@ziggy.xaerolimit.
Quoth David DEMELIER on Friday, 14 January 2011:
> 2011/1/13 Chip Camden :
> >
> > The date on the /home symlink reflects my install date. I don't think
> > anything would touch that.
> >
> > --
> > Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterl...@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F
> > http://camdensoftware.
Quoth Carl Chave on Friday, 14 January 2011:
> > I'd suggest looking at the Btimes of top level directories
> >
> > stat -f "%SB %N" /*
>
> Or how about just / as this ~15 minutes earlier than most of the
> remaining top level directories
>
>
> sodserve# stat -f "%SB %N" /*
> Jan 9 04:54:21 201
On 13 January 2011 20:34, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Thursday, January 13, 2011 a las 09:28:29PM +0100, David Demelier
> escribió:
>
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > I'm just guessing if there is a way to know a FreeBSD installation date.
> > We can't look
>>> I'm just guessing if there is a way to know a FreeBSD installation date.
>>> We can't look after the uname -a ident since an update of the FreeBSD
>>> kernel is possible.
How about looking at /proc or /mnt?
On a couple of my boxes that I checked, tho
2011/1/13 Chip Camden :
> Quoth David Demelier on Thursday, 13 January 2011:
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> I'm just guessing if there is a way to know a FreeBSD installation date.
>> We can't look after the uname -a ident since an update of the FreeBSD
>> kernel
> I'd suggest looking at the Btimes of top level directories
>
> stat -f "%SB %N" /*
Or how about just / as this ~15 minutes earlier than most of the
remaining top level directories
sodserve# stat -f "%SB %N" /*
Jan 9 04:54:21 2011 /COPYRIGHT
Jan 9 04:54:21 2011 /bin
Jan 9 04:54:21 2011 /boot
Chip Camden writes:
> Quoth Carl Johnson on Thursday, 13 January 2011:
>> Polytropon writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:50:27 -0800, Chuck Swiger wrote:
>> >> On Jan 13, 2011, at 1:46 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
>> >> > This is nearly always accurate on any FreeBSD system (when wanting to
>> >>
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 21:28:29 +0100
David Demelier wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I'm just guessing if there is a way to know a FreeBSD installation
> date. We can't look after the uname -a ident since an update of the
> FreeBSD kernel is possible.
>
> I think searchin
Quoth Carl Johnson on Thursday, 13 January 2011:
> Polytropon writes:
>
> > On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:50:27 -0800, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> >> On Jan 13, 2011, at 1:46 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
> >> > This is nearly always accurate on any FreeBSD system (when wanting to
> >> > query the date the machine
Quoth Ivan Voras on Friday, 14 January 2011:
> On 13/01/2011 21:28, David Demelier wrote:
> >Hello folks,
> >
> >I'm just guessing if there is a way to know a FreeBSD installation date.
> >We can't look after the uname -a ident since an update of the FreeB
Polytropon writes:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:50:27 -0800, Chuck Swiger wrote:
>> On Jan 13, 2011, at 1:46 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
>> > This is nearly always accurate on any FreeBSD system (when wanting to
>> > query the date the machine was built):
>> >
>> >ls -l /etc/defaults/rc.conf
>>
>>
On 13/01/2011 21:28, David Demelier wrote:
Hello folks,
I'm just guessing if there is a way to know a FreeBSD installation date.
We can't look after the uname -a ident since an update of the FreeBSD
kernel is possible.
If you haven't removed it, a line in /etc/rc.conf shoul
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:50:27 -0800, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Jan 13, 2011, at 1:46 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
> > This is nearly always accurate on any FreeBSD system (when wanting to
> > query the date the machine was built):
> >
> > ls -l /etc/defaults/rc.conf
>
> I gather that you don't ever
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 13:50 -0800, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Jan 13, 2011, at 1:46 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
> > This is nearly always accurate on any FreeBSD system (when wanting to
> > query the date the machine was built):
> >
> > ls -l /etc/defaults/rc.conf
>
> I gather that you don't ever ru
On Jan 13, 2011, at 1:46 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
> This is nearly always accurate on any FreeBSD system (when wanting to
> query the date the machine was built):
>
> ls -l /etc/defaults/rc.conf
I gather that you don't ever run mergemaster, which would update this file?
My machine installed i
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 13:03 -0800, Chip Camden wrote:
> Quoth Chuck Swiger on Thursday, 13 January 2011:
> > On Jan 13, 2011, at 12:45 PM, Chip Camden wrote:
> > > On my system, /etc/termcap has the date well after my installation
> > > (Jun 28 2010) and /etc/rmt dates to well before (Nov 21 2009).
Quoth Chuck Swiger on Thursday, 13 January 2011:
> On Jan 13, 2011, at 12:45 PM, Chip Camden wrote:
> > On my system, /etc/termcap has the date well after my installation
> > (Jun 28 2010) and /etc/rmt dates to well before (Nov 21 2009). I first
> > installed FreeBSD on this system on Apr 1 2010.
On Jan 13, 2011, at 12:45 PM, Chip Camden wrote:
> On my system, /etc/termcap has the date well after my installation
> (Jun 28 2010) and /etc/rmt dates to well before (Nov 21 2009). I first
> installed FreeBSD on this system on Apr 1 2010.
Certainly the target of the link would change; my /etc/t
2011/1/13 Chuck Swiger :
> On Jan 13, 2011, at 12:28 PM, David Demelier wrote:
>> I'm just guessing if there is a way to know a FreeBSD installation date. We
>> can't look after the uname -a ident since an update of the FreeBSD kernel is
>> possible.
>>
>&
Quoth Chuck Swiger on Thursday, 13 January 2011:
> On Jan 13, 2011, at 12:28 PM, David Demelier wrote:
> > I'm just guessing if there is a way to know a FreeBSD installation date. We
> > can't look after the uname -a ident since an update of the FreeBSD kernel
> >
Quoth David Demelier on Thursday, 13 January 2011:
> Hello folks,
>
> I'm just guessing if there is a way to know a FreeBSD installation date.
> We can't look after the uname -a ident since an update of the FreeBSD
> kernel is possible.
>
> I think searching a f
On Jan 13, 2011, at 12:28 PM, David Demelier wrote:
> I'm just guessing if there is a way to know a FreeBSD installation date. We
> can't look after the uname -a ident since an update of the FreeBSD kernel is
> possible.
>
> I think searching a file absolutely not touch
El dÃa Thursday, January 13, 2011 a las 09:28:29PM +0100, David Demelier
escribió:
> Hello folks,
>
> I'm just guessing if there is a way to know a FreeBSD installation date.
> We can't look after the uname -a ident since an update of the FreeBSD
> kernel is possibl
Hello folks,
I'm just guessing if there is a way to know a FreeBSD installation date.
We can't look after the uname -a ident since an update of the FreeBSD
kernel is possible.
I think searching a file absolutely not touched ever in the system can
helps but which one?
markand@Me
On 8/29/2010 10:21 AM, Mikhail wrote:
> Hello, I have three servers which I'm going to use for dynamips setup, so I
> basicly need only computing power of those machines.
>
> What would be the most effective way to install/upgrade FreeBSD on servers?
> I think about PXE booting through the network
Hello, I have three servers which I'm going to use for dynamips setup, so I
basicly need only computing power of those machines.
What would be the most effective way to install/upgrade FreeBSD on servers?
I think about PXE booting through the network and mounting /,/home over NFS
- is it possible?
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 278, Issue 4, Message 2
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:36:00 +0800 (WST) Bret Busby wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Sep 2009, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
> > Bret Busby wrote:
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> I have been interested in installing FreeBSD on my laptop (HP/Compaq
> >> NX5000, 2MB
On 9/29/09, Polytropon wrote:
> Honestly, I've never seen the need for extended DOS partitions.
> Let's say you intendedly want to run a multi-OS system, then
> you can install four systems, each one in its own slice, and
> within the slice, the partitiions, if needed and supported.
By using
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:36:00 +0800 (WST), Bret Busby wrote:
> See
> http://busby.net/bret/Screenshot--dev-sda-GParted.png
I think I do understand. You have:
1. a primary DOS partition which contains
a NTFS file system
2. an extended DOS partition containing "subpar
Bret Busby wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Sep 2009, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
>
>>
>> Bret Busby wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> I have been interested in installing FreeBSD on my laptop (HP/Compaq
>>> NX5000, 2MB RAM), in a free 20MB partition.
>>
>> I really hope you meant Gb here ;)
>>
>>>
>>> I noticed that the Li
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
Bret Busby wrote:
Hello.
I have been interested in installing FreeBSD on my laptop (HP/Compaq
NX5000, 2MB RAM), in a free 20MB partition.
I really hope you meant Gb here ;)
I noticed that the Linux Format magazine to which I subscribe, in
Issue
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 10:01:18PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have been interested in installing FreeBSD on my laptop (HP/Compaq
> NX5000, 2MB RAM), in a free 20MB partition.
>
> I noticed that the Linux Format magazine to which I subscribe, in Issue
> 124, comes with FreeBSD 7.2
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 22:01:18 +0800 (WST), Bret Busby wrote:
> From what I understand, FreeBSD (and possibly all BSD) uses hard
> disc slices rather than partitions, and therefore cannot
> easily be installed in a free partition, but needs for
> hard disc slices to be used.
I see a terminology pr
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 22:01:18 +0800 (WST)
Bret Busby wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have been interested in installing FreeBSD on my laptop (HP/Compaq
> NX5000, 2MB RAM), in a free 20MB partition.
>
> I noticed that the Linux Format magazine to which I subscribe, in
> Issue 124, comes with FreeBSD 7.2 on
Hello.
I have been interested in installing FreeBSD on my laptop (HP/Compaq NX5000,
2MB RAM), in a free 20MB partition.
I noticed that the Linux Format magazine to which I subscribe, in Issue 124,
comes with FreeBSD 7.2 on the DVD.
From what I understand, FreeBSD (and possibly all BSD) uses
Bret Busby wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have been interested in installing FreeBSD on my laptop (HP/Compaq
> NX5000, 2MB RAM), in a free 20MB partition.
I really hope you meant Gb here ;)
>
> I noticed that the Linux Format magazine to which I subscribe, in
> Issue 124, comes with FreeBSD 7.2 on the DVD
d=2740699
-Original Message-
From: Miguel [mailto:luis.hen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 1:53 PM
To: Ben Fallon
Cc: freebsd-mob...@freebsd.org; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Problems with FreeBSD installation
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Ben Fallon wrote:
> What mod
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Ben Fallon wrote:
> Might want to take a look at this page as it may provide a bit more insight.
> The problem isn't with the Machine specifically but with the ATI Sata
> Controller/Chipset. Not sure if this has been fixed yet.
>
> http://www.mavetju.org/mail/view
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Mel
Flynn wrote:
> Your best bet is to poll the mobile list (CC'd) to see if anyone was able to
> get FreeBSD working on this laptop (or even to know whether this is a lost
> cause till somebody makes some patches for this laptop). Since 7.2 also does
> not work and
NG: WITNESS option enabled, expect reduced performance.
> Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/md0
> warning: no time-of-day clock registered, system time will not be set
> accurately
>
> And at this point... nothing else -- system freezes.
>
> Please let me know if anyone has any sug
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Miguel wrote:
>> Yes, I understand -- just realised that BETA2 is more recent than the
>> snapshot I
>> tried. Most probably, I'll just wait until 8.0 is actually released. My
>> problem with trying BETA2 is th
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Miguel wrote:
>> Yes, I understand -- just realised that BETA2 is more recent than the
>> snapshot I
>> tried. Most probably, I'll just wait until 8.0 is actually released. My
>> problem with trying BETA2 is th
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Miguel wrote:
> Yes, I understand -- just realised that BETA2 is more recent than the
> snapshot I
> tried. Most probably, I'll just wait until 8.0 is actually released. My
> problem with trying BETA2 is that it will take long time to get it (slow
> connection her
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
>> I have not tried 8.0-BETA (as someone on the IRC channel suggested) but not
>> sure
>> if it will make any difference. As far as I understand, the snapshot I
>> tried is
>> more recent than 8.0-BETA2. Or am I wrong? Is it worth downloading
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Miguel wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Miguel wrote:
>>> Hi Glen,
>>>
Can you try booting with ACPI disabled? It should be option 2 from
the loader menu.
>>>
>>> Yes, I tried that already
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Miguel wrote:
>> Hi Glen,
>>
>>>
>>> Can you try booting with ACPI disabled? It should be option 2 from
>>> the loader menu.
>>
>> Yes, I tried that already with same results.
>>
>
> Can you try the installation
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Miguel wrote:
> Hi Glen,
>
>>
>> Can you try booting with ACPI disabled? It should be option 2 from
>> the loader menu.
>
> Yes, I tried that already with same results.
>
Can you try the installation media on another machine (to rule out a
bad CD or bad burn)?
Als
p]
>
>
>>
>> acpi0: Could not initialise SystemIO handler: AE_NOT_EXIST
>> device_attach: acpi0 attach returned 6
>> Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec
>> md0: Preload image 4194304 bytes at 0x80fd8660
>> SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched!
>> WARNIN
on enabled, expect reduced performance.
> Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/md0
> warning: no time-of-day clock registered, system time will not be set
> accurately
>
> And at this point... nothing else -- system freezes.
>
> Please let me know if anyone has any suggestions for
expect reduced performance.
Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/md0
warning: no time-of-day clock registered, system time will not be set accurately
And at this point... nothing else -- system freezes.
Please let me know if anyone has any suggestions for me to have a FreeBSD
installation on my laptop.
pwn wrote:
[snip]
>>> on this page
>>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html
>>> it says:
>>> Tip: By default, when you build a custom kernel, all kernel modules will
>>> be rebuilt as well. If you want to update a kernel faster or to build
>>> only custom m
Jerry McAllister escreveu:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 06:39:16PM +, pwn wrote:
Jerry McAllister escreveu:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 05:56:01PM +, pwn wrote:
Jerry McAllister escreveu:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 01:43:23PM +, pwn wrote:
im
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 06:39:16PM +, pwn wrote:
> Jerry McAllister escreveu:
> >On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 05:56:01PM +, pwn wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Jerry McAllister escreveu:
> >>
> >>>On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 01:43:23PM +, pwn wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> immediately after the
Jerry McAllister escreveu:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 05:56:01PM +, pwn wrote:
Jerry McAllister escreveu:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 01:43:23PM +, pwn wrote:
immediately after the installation of FreeBSD what steps should be
performed by order
1 - Configuring the FreeBSD
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 05:56:01PM +, pwn wrote:
> Jerry McAllister escreveu:
> >On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 01:43:23PM +, pwn wrote:
> >
> >
> >>immediately after the installation of FreeBSD what steps should be
> >>performed by order
> >>1 - Configuring the FreeBSD Kernel
> >>2 - The Cutt
Jerry McAllister escreveu:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 01:43:23PM +, pwn wrote:
immediately after the installation of FreeBSD what steps should be
performed by order
1 - Configuring the FreeBSD Kernel
2 - The Cutting Edge
3 - Updating FreeBSD
Is this the proper order?
I would say, f
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 01:43:23PM +, pwn wrote:
> immediately after the installation of FreeBSD what steps should be
> performed by order
> 1 - Configuring the FreeBSD Kernel
> 2 - The Cutting Edge
> 3 - Updating FreeBSD
>
> Is this the proper order?
I would say, first update FreeBSD src a
andrew clarke escreveu:
On Wed 2008-10-29 13:43:23 UTC+, pwn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
immediately after the installation of FreeBSD what steps should be
performed by order
1 - Configuring the FreeBSD Kernel
2 - The Cutting Edge
3 - Updating FreeBSD
Is this the proper order?
there is
On Wed 2008-10-29 13:43:23 UTC+, pwn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> immediately after the installation of FreeBSD what steps should be
> performed by order
> 1 - Configuring the FreeBSD Kernel
> 2 - The Cutting Edge
> 3 - Updating FreeBSD
>
> Is this the proper order?
> there is some set of ru
immediately after the installation of FreeBSD what steps should be
performed by order
1 - Configuring the FreeBSD Kernel
2 - The Cutting Edge
3 - Updating FreeBSD
Is this the proper order?
there is some set of rules to be followed post-installation?
since, i do not find any reference mentioning
On Friday 19 September 2008 12:17:35 Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Matthew Seaman wrote:
> > > Mel wrote:
> > > > that's aside from the fact that the root partition '/' always has to
> > > > be the first partition, for the simple reason that everything else
Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthew Seaman wrote:
> > Mel wrote:
> > > that's aside from the fact that the root partition '/' always has to be
> > > the
> > > first partition, for the simple reason that everything else is mounted
> > > on top
> > > of it.
> >
> > It's n
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Mel wrote:
> > that's aside from the fact that the root partition '/' always has to be
> > the
> > first partition, for the simple reason that everything else is mounted on
> > top
> > of it.
>
> It's not the partition device names that determine the mount order
Mel wrote:
that's aside from the fact that the root partition '/' always has to be the
first partition, for the simple reason that everything else is mounted on top
of it.
For the same reason:
/dev/ad1se /usr/local
/dev/ad1sf /usr
will not work.
For this particular case (root
On Thursday 18 September 2008 16:26:43 Erik Trulsson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 03:49:37PM +0300, Robert Lebovich wrote:
> > I'm trying to install freeBSD on my pc, but after the installation it
> > doesn't boot. It can't find the kernel.
> > I think it is the problem with my partitioning. i'
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 03:49:37PM +0300, Robert Lebovich wrote:
> I'm trying to install freeBSD on my pc, but after the installation it
> doesn't boot. It can't find the kernel.
> I think it is the problem with my partitioning. i'm trying this order:
> /boot
> swap
> /
> /var
> /usr
> Can you he
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 03:32:09PM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote:
>
> Robert Lebovich skrev:
> >I'm trying to install freeBSD on my pc, but after the installation it
> >doesn't boot. It can't find the kernel.
> >I think it is the problem with my partitioning. i'm trying this order:
> >/boot
> >swap
Robert Lebovich skrev:
I'm trying to install freeBSD on my pc, but after the installation it
doesn't boot. It can't find the kernel.
I think it is the problem with my partitioning. i'm trying this order:
/boot
swap
/
/var
/usr
Can you help me how to install in this order?
__
I'm trying to install freeBSD on my pc, but after the installation it
doesn't boot. It can't find the kernel.
I think it is the problem with my partitioning. i'm trying this order:
/boot
swap
/
/var
/usr
Can you help me how to install in this order?
__
Hello,
I've an USB stick of 1 GByte and my idea is to put the FreeBSD 7.0
installation disk on this to boot from and install the system in a
laptop which does not have other external devices; in the past I've put
already a FreeBSD boot able system on such a stick, following this
recipe:
http://gr
and when
learning something new and this notion should be pointed out somewhat
earlier in chapter 2.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/FreeBSD-Installation-tp4535482p17793141.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
Hi,
For local installations of FreeBSD via FTP, I tried to setup a local FTP
mirror using the preferred method as described in section 3.1.3 of the
following :-
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/hubs/mirror-howto.html
However, I found that the ftp-master.freebsd.org refused to accept cv
I use an ACER notebook 5050 with 2 partitions (one i386, and other
amd64)
the amd64 is faster, the software is very stable, and everything
works...
I do not use the sleep mode, the freebsd kernel keeps the processor
halted when not
in use, so the battery lasts longer, and the boot (total boot is
Sébastien Morand wrote:
Hi,
...
So before reinstalling everything, I'd like to know :
Is it a reasonable choice (in terme of performance, reliability, and
compatibility terms) to install i386 over amd64 arch?
For a desktop i386 is still the better choice and unless you have more than 3G
of R
1 - 100 of 262 matches
Mail list logo
