On May 27, 2011, at 3:31 PM, Rogelio wrote:
> It was one of those things where in an effort to quickly fix things, I
> split up the collision domain and used a router to handle the ARP.
>
> Right now, a 7201 router has about 15K ARPs, and the system is much slower.
I'm not surprised. Even good s
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
> Was the rate of ARPs the problem?
Nikos, unfortunately, I'm not sure.
It was one of those things where in an effort to quickly fix things, I
split up the collision domain and used a router to handle the ARP.
Right now, a 7201 router ha
On 5/23/2011 10:46 PM, Rogelio wrote:
I found that a certain Linux gateway was having a difficult time with
thousands of ARP entries (about 13K concurrent ARP entries in 10 min
from ISP subscribers), so I put it behind a Cisco 7201 router and
added an IP helper to the interface. Now it seems to
I found that a certain Linux gateway was having a difficult time with
thousands of ARP entries (about 13K concurrent ARP entries in 10 min
from ISP subscribers), so I put it behind a Cisco 7201 router and
added an IP helper to the interface. Now it seems to be working much
much better.
In the fut
i didn't
had the time to debug it to find out the problem. I would like to know what
happened there.
The good thing is that a future client of my company works with the same
accounting software
and the server runs FBSD so if something goes wrong i'll have the time to
debug properly.
it may be so
if it could work for 2 months and then refused - something must have been
changed on the client software side.
No Mr. Puchar nothing changed on the client side.
so what changed on server side so it stopped working after 2 months?
in unix there are no "magic things" - things works or not.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Manfred Usselmann <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:43:03 +0200 (CEST)
> Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > the software admin told me that the permissions should be very open
> > > on the directories and files
> > > so i made the
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:43:03 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > the software admin told me that the permissions should be very open
> > on the directories and files
> > so i made them 0777. the software worked like a charm for about 2
> > months but after that
> > at some
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Wojciech Puchar <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the software admin told me that the permissions should be very open on the
>> directories and files
>> so i made them 0777. the software worked like a charm for about 2 months
>> but
>> after that
>> at some point the c
Valentin Bud wrote:
hello list,
a little story about samba and FreeBSD.
I had to make a file server for a company that uses a program for
accounting. that software works with lots of files to do the job.
the software admin told me that the permissions should be very open on the
directories and
the software admin told me that the permissions should be very open on the
directories and files
so i made them 0777. the software worked like a charm for about 2 months but
after that
at some point the client couldn't access the files on the samba server.
if it could work for 2 months and then
Hello list,
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Valentin Bud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > hello list,
> > a little story about samba and FreeBSD.
> > I had to make a file server for a company that uses a program
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Valentin Bud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello list,
> a little story about samba and FreeBSD.
> I had to make a file server for a company that uses a program for
> accounting. that software works with lots of files to do the job.
>
> the software admin told me t
hello list,
a little story about samba and FreeBSD.
I had to make a file server for a company that uses a program for
accounting. that software works with lots of files to do the job.
the software admin told me that the permissions should be very open on the
directories and files
so i made them 0
Charles Mason wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Wojciech Puchar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am very interrested by feedback of "real world" samba admins running it
with FreeBSD
or Linux , my boss push hardly to use Linux but I would much prefer
FreeBSD
do what your boss wants. it's his c
Frank Bonnet schrieb:
I am on the way to setup a brand new Samba server with OpenLDAP backend
I am very interrested by feedback of "real world" samba admins running
it with FreeBSD
or Linux , my boss push hardly to use Linux but I would much prefer FreeBSD
so good arguments are welcome ( my b
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Frank Bonnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am on the way to setup a brand new Samba server with OpenLDAP backend
>
> I am very interrested by feedback of "real world" samba admins running it
> with FreeBSD
> or Linux , my boss push hardly to use Linux bu
A boss hires someone that knows what he/she is talking about and relies on
his/her vision.
so - he/she should not persuade what OS will be, just WHAT should be done.
To get informed this person might get his/her information
before he/she decides what the best solution might be; I do hope he/she
Uit een eerder bericht (17-10-2008 17:42):
do what your boss wants. it's his company, and it's his right to make
bad decision
A boss hires someone that knows what he/she is talking about and relies
on his/her vision. To get informed this person might get his/her
information before he/she decid
If he's a good boss (as the poster seem to be implying) then he will
be asking because he hasn't made his mind up his mind completely, but
yeah don't get fired over it :)
in most cases and with system doing ONLY samba, both linux and freebsd
will work fine.
so his boss is not smart for sure p
decision
This is off-topic, but I wholly disagree. As a professional employee, it's my
job to advise my boss on technological matters,
yes - advise
no - persuade!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin
On Friday 17 October 2008 18:55:19 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 05:13:45PM +0100, Charles Mason wrote:
> > From what I have seen, both are perfectly capable and since its samba
> > that will be doing most of the actual work its probably doesn't matter
> > that much. Of course th
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 05:13:45PM +0100, Charles Mason wrote:
> From what I have seen, both are perfectly capable and since its samba
> that will be doing most of the actual work its probably doesn't matter
> that much. Of course the next question if he goes with Linux, is which
> distro. Perhaps
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 04:34:00PM +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am on the way to setup a brand new Samba server with OpenLDAP backend
>
> I am very interrested by feedback of "real world" samba admins running it
> with FreeBSD
> or Linux , my boss push hardly to use Linux but I would
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Wojciech Puchar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I am very interrested by feedback of "real world" samba admins running it
>> with FreeBSD
>> or Linux , my boss push hardly to use Linux but I would much prefer
>> FreeBSD
>
> do what your boss wants. it's his company
On Friday 17 October 2008 10:42:05 Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> do what your boss wants. it's his company, and it's his right to make bad
> decision
This is off-topic, but I wholly disagree. As a professional employee, it's my
job to advise my boss on technological matters, and to persuade him to c
I am very interrested by feedback of "real world" samba admins running it
with FreeBSD
or Linux , my boss push hardly to use Linux but I would much prefer FreeBSD
do what your boss wants. it's his company, and it's his right to make bad
decision
_
Hello
I am on the way to setup a brand new Samba server with OpenLDAP backend
I am very interrested by feedback of "real world" samba admins running it with
FreeBSD
or Linux , my boss push hardly to use Linux but I would much prefer FreeBSD
so good arguments are welcome ( my boss is a smart guy
I'm not really an expert on this but here goes...
On Wednesday 18 April 2007 18:05:44 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> i am looking into implementing a piece of the V4L interface. this
> involves mmap'ing from userspace into kernelspace.
>
> in mplayer, this is what is called:
>
> tvi_v4l2.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> does mmap work on freebsd as it works on linux? ie: can i mmap
> any device? are there constraints on the device which should be
> met?
U ... "man 2 mmap"?
Robert Huff
Hi All,
i am looking into implementing a piece of the V4L interface. this
involves mmap'ing from userspace into kernelspace.
in mplayer, this is what is called:
tvi_v4l2.c:
"
priv->map[i].addr = mmap (0, priv->map[i].buf.length, PROT_READ |
PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARE
On 18 Jan 2006, at 17:17, Nikolas Britton wrote:
On 1/17/06, Philip Hallstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The computer is currently without keyboard, mouse or monitor. I am
adding applications to the computer via ssh while I work. As
soon as I
get openbox and tightvnc installed, I'll switc
>-Original Message-
>From: Adam Nealis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 2:59 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: Graham Bentley; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Linux
>
>
>I disagree with that. The guidelines fo
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Adam Nealis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 3:13 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Graham Bentley; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: FreeBSD vs Linux
--- Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
W
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 10:13 PM
>To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Linux
>
>
>> "is freebsd better than linux"
> "is freebsd better than linux" kind of question is perfectly legitimate.
"Is FreeBSD more suitible as a desktop system with
a 200mHz pentium-pro and a 4 gigabyte hard-drive
than windows 3.11 on dos 6.22 on vmware on top
of Solaris 10?" is perfectly legitimate.
"Is FreeBSD better than Slackware?"
>-Original Message-
>From: Danial Thom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 12:36 PM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Dick Davies; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: RE: FreeBSD vs Linux
>
>
>
>
>More rambling, useless points from Ted. Whethe
>-Original Message-
>From: Adam Nealis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 3:13 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Graham Bentley; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: RE: FreeBSD vs Linux
>
>
>--- Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
--- Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Danial Thom
> >Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:54 AM
> >To: Dick Davies; freebsd-questions
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 01:19:38 -0800
"Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What do you say to the people who want to do some research before
> putting the time into installing it?
>
> Ted
http://www.freebsd.org/
http://www.freebsddiary.org/topics.php
http://www.onlamp.com/bsd/
http:/
> What do you say to the people who want to do some research before
> putting the time into installing it?
>
> Ted
http://www.freesbie.org/
;-)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
t; >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Graham Bentley
> >Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 3:28 AM
> >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> >Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Linux
> >
> >
> >Damn, I just fell into the same old trap. This is a questions
> >list
ons@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Linux
>
>
>Damn, I just fell into the same old trap. This is a questions
>list about FreeBSD. I already use it (as well as other OS's)
>What do I care about the arguments for and against xy and z?
>
>Thinking about it now, if I was
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Danial Thom
>Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:54 AM
>To: Dick Davies; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Linux
>
>
>
>> > Microsoft pays hardwar
Damn, I just fell into the same old trap. This is a questions
list about FreeBSD. I already use it (as well as other OS's)
What do I care about the arguments for and against xy and z?
Thinking about it now, if I was asking the same question and
someone said "Why not try out FreeBSD and make yo
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 08:03:15PM +0100, Mathias Menzel-Nielsen wrote:
> My hardware is fully supported by FreeBSD and in fact some of it was
> supported earlier on FreeBSD than on Linux.
> For example, the Brooktree bktr(4) Video-Capture driver existed first on
> FreeBSD, also high-speed cd-bur
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 21:15:15 +
Tim Greening-Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 18:15 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > What is the essential difference
> > between FreeBSD and Linux (Fedora for instance)?
>
> I have been following this thread (and similar ones over t
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 14:00:59 +
Dick Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Let me first point out I've seen about 4 different 'unix/windows is
> teh gayz0r' threads on completely unrelated mailing lists in the
> last 24 hours.
> If I sound bored rigid with the whole subject that might be why.]
>
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2006-01-18 16:55, Matias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > What is the essential difference between FreeBSD and Linux (Fedora
>> > for instance)? Where can I find any list of differences?
>> > W
On 18/01/06, Danial Thom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Dick Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 18/01/06, Danial Thom
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(actually, no he didn't. your mail clients quoting is insane)
(some guy:)
> > > > > Microsoft pays hardware manufacturers to make drivers f
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 18:15 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What is the essential difference
> between FreeBSD and Linux (Fedora for instance)?
I have been following this thread (and similar ones over the past few
weeks) and would like to offer my perspective on the "FreeBSD versus
Linux" discus
--- Dick Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 18/01/06, Danial Thom
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > Microsoft pays hardware manufacturers to
> > > > make drivers for their OS,
> > >
> > > I seriously doubt it. They don't need to
> with
> > > their market share.
>
> > Ok, what do you
On 18/01/06, Martin Tournoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So what? That's exactly the same for FreeBSD, even it's core apps.
> > And vendors rush to support MS' new OSes.
> There's a very big dump of unmaintained software, whenever I want to
> play an old "classic" game like c&c, x-com or even s
Dick Davies => Sorry for sending you this mail twice, accidently
pressed enter...(shoudn't eat and write e-mails at the same time...)
> So what? That's exactly the same for FreeBSD, even it's core apps.
> And vendors rush to support MS' new OSes.
There's a very big dump of unmaintained software,
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matias
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 3:55 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Linux
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
&
On 1/17/06, Philip Hallstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The computer is currently without keyboard, mouse or monitor. I am
> > adding applications to the computer via ssh while I work. As soon as I
> > get openbox and tightvnc installed, I'll switch to tightvnc so I can
> > disconnect without
On 18/01/06, Danial Thom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Microsoft pays hardware manufacturers to
> > > make drivers for their OS,
> >
> > I seriously doubt it. They don't need to with
> > their market share.
> Ok, what do you guys live in a shoe or something?
> MS doesn't have to "pay" vendo
> > Microsoft pays hardware manufacturers to
> > make drivers for their OS,
>
> I seriously doubt it. They don't need to with
> their market share.
Ok, what do you guys live in a shoe or something?
For pete's sake, how can so many people be so
patently clueless and still be able to find food
a
On Jan 18, 2006, at 10:55 AM, Matias wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the essential difference
between FreeBSD and Linux (Fedora for instance)?
Where can I find any list of differences?
What/Where are the advantages of FreeBSD vs Linux?
Greetings
Greg
On 2006-01-18 16:55, Matias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > What is the essential difference between FreeBSD and Linux (Fedora
> > for instance)? Where can I find any list of differences?
> > What/Where are the advantages of FreeBSD vs Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What is the essential difference
> between FreeBSD and Linux (Fedora for instance)?
> Where can I find any list of differences?
> What/Where are the advantages of FreeBSD vs Linux?
> Greetings
> Greg
>
> _
[Let me first point out I've seen about 4 different 'unix/windows is
teh gayz0r' threads on completely unrelated mailing lists in the last
24 hours.
If I sound bored rigid with the whole subject that might be why.]
Can we please stop comparing *NIX to windows. They're nothing
like each other. Like
> Windows almost runs everything
Quite the opposite, try running some application from a few years back
on windows 200 or XP, big chance it won't work.
> Unix has not matured yet to compete with Microsoft.
Yeah, let's just forget that UNIX had stuff like network support
before windows even exist
*Some* reasonable and balanced points for a questions list :)
My laptop distro www.zenwalk.org
My rack server www.trustix.org
My webserver www.freebsd.org (of course:)
For very boring locked in accounts work W2K
Using the appropraite tool for the job seems to be the best
advice I have had on this
On Jan 17, 2006, at 3:00 PM, Tamouh H. wrote:
Just get a different sound card. There are lotsof
inexpensive sounds cards that are probably supported by
FreeBSD for just a few (10-30) $
Btw, this problem happens with Windows, Mac OS X, etc as
well. I have been trying to put an extra USB/Fi
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:00:26 -0500
"Tamouh H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Just get a different sound card. There are lotsof
> > inexpensive sounds cards that are probably supported by
> > FreeBSD for just a few (10-30) $
> >
> > Btw, this problem happens with Windows, Mac OS X, etc as
>
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 21:32:30 +0200
Mehmet Fatih AKBULUT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> any idea when i'll be able to use my sound card on freebsd ;) ?
> [high definition audio :p]
> changing the topic ;)
> missed listening to music :'( [my speakers will get rot soon, dont
> even know if they still w
On Jan 17, 2006, at 4:31 PM, Dick Davies wrote:
On 17/01/06, David Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Someone has an unsupported sound card with a Linux example. All the
tough details about the hardware are spelled out in the Linux driver.
Plenty of FreeBSD drivers have been ported to Linux and
On Jan 17, 2006, at 6:16 PM, Tamouh H. wrote:
Still Microsoft has the upper hand! How about this for an idea,
sponsored
drivers ? Why not allow such service that if an organization or
individual
wishes to have a driver written they can sponsor a FreeBSD
developer to do
it?
How is that
>That or the user(s). Microsoft doesn't write any sound card drivers, they
make
>>>manufacturers do it then pay and beg to be included on the master
distribution >CD/DVD.
>For a device to work in FreeBSD someone who wants it bad enough to do the
work has >to have the skills and want it bad enough
David Kelly wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 05:00:26PM -0500, Tamouh H. wrote:
Just get a different sound card. There are lotsof
inexpensive sounds cards that are probably supported by
FreeBSD for just a few (10-30) $
Oh come on, I've been working with all Linux, FreeBSD and Wind
Tamouh H. wrote:
Just get a different sound card. There are lotsof
inexpensive sounds cards that are probably supported by
FreeBSD for just a few (10-30) $
Btw, this problem happens with Windows, Mac OS X, etc as
well. I have been trying to put an extra USB/Firewire card
in my G5, and they wor
Andrew L. Gould wrote:
A FreeBSD vs Linux anecdote:
I've read several articles over the years talking about how Linux can
breathe new life into old computers. After the last couple of weeks, I
don't buy it.
After combining the hardware from 2 old computers (circa 1996 and
1998
On 17/01/06, David Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Someone has an unsupported sound card with a Linux example. All the
> tough details about the hardware are spelled out in the Linux driver.
> Plenty of FreeBSD drivers have been ported to Linux and vice versa.
Danger Will Robinson! The GPL ca
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 05:00:26PM -0500, Tamouh H. wrote:
>
>
> > Just get a different sound card. There are lotsof
> > inexpensive sounds cards that are probably supported by
> > FreeBSD for just a few (10-30) $
>
> Oh come on, I've been working with all Linux, FreeBSD and Windows.
>
> Getti
> Just get a different sound card. There are lotsof
> inexpensive sounds cards that are probably supported by
> FreeBSD for just a few (10-30) $
>
> Btw, this problem happens with Windows, Mac OS X, etc as
> well. I have been trying to put an extra USB/Firewire card
> in my G5, and they work, b
Using sound on a Unix box will not give you the same support for that then
on a windows box if the sound card problem is with all major os'es then i
would think your sound card is ready to be changed out i have a audigy Z2
in my unix box and i have had no errors so fare freebsd doesnt support
high
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:32:30 -0800 (PST)
Philip Hallstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The computer is currently without keyboard, mouse or monitor. I am
> > adding applications to the computer via ssh while I work. As soon
> > as I get openbox and tightvnc installed, I'll switch to tightvnc s
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:57:04 -0700
"Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 17, 2006, at 11:38 AM, Danial Thom wrote:
>
> > No, thats ridiculous. Linux has multiple
> > distributions that use the same kernel. The fact
> > that freebsd only has one distribution doesn't
>
The computer is currently without keyboard, mouse or monitor. I am
adding applications to the computer via ssh while I work. As soon as I
get openbox and tightvnc installed, I'll switch to tightvnc so I can
disconnect without disrupting jobs. (Hmm, I wonder if I'll have to add
a mouse or keyboa
A FreeBSD vs Linux anecdote:
I've read several articles over the years talking about how Linux can
breathe new life into old computers. After the last couple of weeks, I
don't buy it.
After combining the hardware from 2 old computers (circa 1996 and
1998 -- anyone remember ISA car
he meantime
> why don't you spend $5 and get a cheap sound card to give you something to do
> while you wait?:)
>
> OpenBSD vs. FreeBSD vs. Linux opens up a new old can of worms... or is that
> an new can of old worms?
>
> Mike
Hi,
My experience with FreeBSD on the l
On Jan 17, 2006, at 12:32 PM, Mehmet Fatih AKBULUT wrote:
any idea when i'll be able to use my sound card on freebsd ;) ?
[high definition audio :p]
changing the topic ;)
missed listening to music :'( [my speakers will get rot soon, dont
even know
if they still work :p]
Just get a differen
On Jan 17, 2006, at 11:38 AM, Danial Thom wrote:
No, thats ridiculous. Linux has multiple
distributions that use the same kernel. The fact
that freebsd only has one distribution doesn't
make it any more complete.
Actually it is spot on. Linux is a kernel. The various
distributions add a
Have similar performance hah
> Linux is just kernel only.
>
> FreeBSD is complete operating system.
>
> FreeBSD and Linux have almost similar performance. There are much
> already discussed about it, a google search will give you more info.
> ___
> freeb
they still work :p]
You know it could be worse, you could be using OpenBSD and then you'd never
even have a chance at getting a proprietary driver to work. ;) In the meantime
why don't you spend $5 and get a cheap sound card to give you something to do
while you wait?:)
OpenBSD vs. F
any idea when i'll be able to use my sound card on freebsd ;) ?
[high definition audio :p]
changing the topic ;)
missed listening to music :'( [my speakers will get rot soon, dont even know
if they still work :p]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
feel comfortable. But pushing FreeBSD in the "Server-OS -- No
multimedia possible"-corner does not
represents its current state.
Sorry, I dont want to start a FreeBSD vs. Linux Discussion -- just
giving my 2 cents...
greetings
Matze
___
fr
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 10:38:24AM -0800, Danial Thom wrote:
>
> No, thats ridiculous. Linux has multiple
> distributions that use the same kernel. The fact
> that freebsd only has one distribution doesn't
> make it any more complete.
>
"Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that alloc
On 1/17/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the essential difference
> between FreeBSD and Linux (Fedora for instance)?
> Where can I find any list of differences?
> What/Where are the advantages of FreeBSD vs Linux?
Just google for it, there are ple
--- Mike Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 10:07:25AM -0800,
> Danial Thom wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- "FlashWebHost.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Linux is just kernel only.
> > >
> > > FreeBSD is complete operating system.
> > >
> > > FreeBSD and Li
7;s for
custom things like firewalls and utility systems (cd/dvd burning, etc).
--PJ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the essential difference
between FreeBSD and Linux (Fedora for instance)?
Where can I find any list of differences?
What/Where are the advantages of FreeBSD vs Linux?
Greetings
G
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 10:07:25AM -0800, Danial Thom wrote:
>
>
> --- "FlashWebHost.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Linux is just kernel only.
> >
> > FreeBSD is complete operating system.
> >
> > FreeBSD and Linux have almost similar
> > performance. There are much
> > already discu
i use freebsd at home too :) [as the only o.s. for my pc]
that was 'my opinion'. [dont have sound :'( but still use it :p ]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 18:42, Mehmet Fatih AKBULUT wrote:
> but freebsd mostly
> used as a server. not much suitable for PC usage.
I really dislike this canard, I have run FreeBSD on a laptop since 3.4
and support for the hardware has generally been adequate, I guess
it depends what you want
--- "FlashWebHost.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Linux is just kernel only.
>
> FreeBSD is complete operating system.
>
> FreeBSD and Linux have almost similar
> performance. There are much
> already discussed about it, a google search
> will give you more info.
Nothing personal, but thats
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What is the essential difference
> between FreeBSD and Linux (Fedora for
> instance)?
> Where can I find any list of differences?
> What/Where are the advantages of FreeBSD vs
> Linux?
> Greetings
> Greg
Whats the difference between a whe
Linux is just kernel only.
FreeBSD is complete operating system.
FreeBSD and Linux have almost similar performance. There are much
already discussed about it, a google search will give you more info.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http:/
hi,
kernel is one of the differences ;)
freebsd uses generic kernel.
and one other important difference is freebsd doest not support my intel
high definition audio card :(
so no sound for years :'( [other distros debian, suse ... support my card.]
instead of yum or apt-get, you have ports in freebs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What is the essential difference
> between FreeBSD and Linux (Fedora for instance)?
> Where can I find any list of differences?
> What/Where are the advantages of FreeBSD vs Linux?
http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/rants/bsd4linux/bsd4linux1.php
Fab
1 - 100 of 232 matches
Mail list logo
