Mel Flynn wrote:
On Saturday 28 March 2009 13:06:44 Robert Huff wrote:
Mel Flynn writes:
Can I ask one more possibly really dumb question, to which I
can find no answer: Is there a 'conventional', or sensible
for one reason oranother, place to download application source to?
Most
--On March 29, 2009 11:03:03 AM -0500 Barnaby Scott b...@waywood.co.uk
wrote:
Many thanks to all who have helped on this one.
I managed to get wine installed without X and it works :) However my
application doesn't :(
Most of the errors are concerned with MS Visual C++ libraries, which I
have
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Barnaby Scott wrote:
Thanks for all the ideas about where to download/install custom apps -
the one that appeals most at this stage is a jail, partly because I have
never played with them, and I think I should progress my learning in
that direction. However I find the other
On Friday 27 March 2009 15:42:27 Barnaby Scott wrote:
Can I ask one more possibly really dumb question, to which I can find no
answer: Is there a 'conventional', or sensible for one reason or
another, place to download application source to?
Most systems I use or inherited use a variation of
Mel Flynn writes:
Can I ask one more possibly really dumb question, to which I
can find no answer: Is there a 'conventional', or sensible
for one reason oranother, place to download application source to?
Most systems I use or inherited use a variation of ~/src ~/cvs or
~/svn,
On Saturday 28 March 2009 13:06:44 Robert Huff wrote:
Mel Flynn writes:
Can I ask one more possibly really dumb question, to which I
can find no answer: Is there a 'conventional', or sensible
for one reason oranother, place to download application source to?
Most systems I use
2009/3/28 Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com:
Mel Flynn writes:
Can I ask one more possibly really dumb question, to which I
can find no answer: Is there a 'conventional', or sensible
for one reason oranother, place to download application source to?
Most systems I use or inherited
rendering binary to run is an exercise for you. :-)
I left wine without x installed on my system. If you have questions, I
*may* be able to help.
Can I ask one more possibly really dumb question, to which I can find no
answer: Is there a 'conventional', or sensible for one reason
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Barnaby Scott wrote:
Can I ask one more possibly really dumb question, to which I can find no
answer: Is there a 'conventional', or sensible for one reason or another,
place to download application source to? Presumably you don't want it mixed
Not dumb at all. There are
--On Friday, March 27, 2009 09:42:27 -0500 Barnaby Scott b...@waywood.co.uk
wrote:
Can I ask one more possibly really dumb question, to which I can find no
answer: Is there a 'conventional', or sensible for one reason or
another, place to download application source to? Presumably you don't
I'm sorry if I'm asking in the wrong place, but I have tried elsewhere
and go no response.
I want to install wine, but without X on the system. Obviously trying to
do this from ports drags in loads of X-related stuff. There doesn't seem
to be a WITHOUT_X11 knob available for the wine port
In response to Barnaby Scott b...@waywood.co.uk:
I'm sorry if I'm asking in the wrong place, but I have tried elsewhere
and go no response.
I want to install wine, but without X on the system.
Why would you expect this to be possible? The GUI is an integral part
of MS Windows ... I can't
Bill Moran writes:
I want to install wine, but without X on the system.
Why would you expect this to be possible? The GUI is an integral
part of MS Windows ... I can't imagine how wine would work at all
without X installed -- which is probably why you're not getting
any answers.
2009/3/26 Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com:
Bill Moran writes:
I want to install wine, but without X on the system.
Why would you expect this to be possible? The GUI is an integral
part of MS Windows ... I can't imagine how wine would work at all
without X installed -- which is
no response.
I want to install wine, but without X on the system. Obviously trying to do
what you want to do with wine not having X?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
wine without X is fine, so long as the
app does not attempt to open any sort of window, system tray etc.
As for the 'cluttering' - I'm not so worried about disk space, that's
cheap these days. It's more a question of updating ports. When I once
made the mistake of installing X and various other
getting bored, but I don't want X cluttering them up.)
Any help gratefully received
Number 1, you should always google first. There's a wealth of posts on the web
about running wine without X.
Note that, at present, the wine port will not work. (There is an IGNORE line
in the Makefile
libraries or the kernel, but does not use the gui.
that's possible. anyway - if you can't build wine without X, built it with
X, it will only install X libraries nothing else and it will work when
command line utils will be used.
___
freebsd-questions
called wineconsole, but ironically that *does*
appear to require X. Just using wine without X is fine, so long as the
app does not attempt to open any sort of window, system tray etc.
As for the 'cluttering' - I'm not so worried about disk space, that's
cheap these days. It's more a question
in that it offers a thing called wineconsole, but ironically that *does*
appear to require X. Just using wine without X is fine, so long as the
app does not attempt to open any sort of window, system tray etc.
As for the 'cluttering' - I'm not so worried about disk space, that's
cheap these days. It's
20 matches
Mail list logo
