with backtrace, it looks like:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] STORAGE kgdb kernel.debug /var/crash/vmcore.1
[GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads: /usr/lib/libthread_db.so: Undefined
symbol ps_pglobal_lookup]
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free
since i activate ataidle i have this errors:
ad8: FAILURE - WRITE_DMA48 timed out LBA=314770799
+ad8: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=12207
+ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing
request directly
after disable it, this messages are gone.
so
Hello friends,
My employer is buying this Dell server and I would like to have your opinion
about the configuration.
Requirements are:
2 Websites with 3-4 million hits per month with video ads.
Operating System:
*FreeBSD AMD647-STABBLE*
Database:
*PHP+MySQL with Apache*
Server
There's a tip in the FreeBSD fortunes database that says:
Want to strip UTF-8 BOM(Bye Order Mark) from given files?
sed -e '1s/^\xef\xbb\xbf//' bomfile newfile
I can't make it work, and I can't find any other method to
work with hexa codes in scripts or on the command line so
I'm kind-a
On Tuesday 20 May 2008 16:44, RW wrote:
On Tue, 20 May 2008 11:33:50 +0200
Jonathan McKeown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 20 May 2008 02:41, RW wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2008 21:46:03 +1200
Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
find /usr/src \( -name Makefile -or -name
Hi,
Do you have a version that will run with an AMD Sempron 3100+, 1.8Ghz,
32 bit, X86 family processor?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Hello,
some users of FreeNAS which is based on FreeBSD 6.3 reported instant reboots on
systems with 2GB RAM (most of them use 4GB). The reboot occurs right after
displaying the FreeBSD loader menu. Most of them told me that they can boot if
they reduce RAM to = 2GB.
We are using the
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Russell Schoen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Do you have a version that will run with an AMD Sempron 3100+, 1.8Ghz, 32
bit, X86 family processor?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
Hi all,
I have an ipw2200 bg. I can't make it work under FreeBSD 7 on AMD64.
This is the output of pciconf -lv
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:5:0: class=0x028000 card=0x27028086 chip=0x42208086
rev=0x05 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
device
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Wojciech Puchar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then, if crash dumps are enabled, it could be a HW failure..
no it is not. i have similar problems but not with apache, it is certainly
FreeBSD bug that causes it to randomly reboot under certain types of load.
i
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Brad Penoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In response to Brad Penoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have an application that runs on Linux or Mac OS X but seems to have
a problem when I run on FreeBSD (6.3
I guess it can, but in the past when hardware has failed for me, I
generally got some indicative errors in the logs.
I managed to move a lot of the intensive operations across to another
server and for the moment,its working much better on the other server
which has a newer kernel.
Cheers
Alan
We had a power failure last night, and this morning I found that imapproxyd
(running on a webserver which provides webmail) had failed to start because
it depends on imapd (running on the mailserver, a different host), and
imapproxyd had won the startup race.
I need to prevent the race by
Requirements are:
2 Websites with 3-4 million hits per month with video ads.
which means 10 per day. some time ago i wa doing somethink like that
on 486/100.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
a problem when I run on FreeBSD (6.3 or 7). The issue is the memory
footprint for the application (osubw_sctpclien below) is quite large;
on Linux it can be as much as 950 MB in resident memory, according to
top. However, on FreeBSD I start to get ENOMEM always around the time
my resident
I guess it can, but in the past when hardware has failed for me, I
generally got some indicative errors in the logs.
hardware failures are different. rarely causes reboot, or reboots ramdomly
independent of what you do.
with bad memory it usually produces sig11 or similar errors much more
Yes,
but its 4 million each.. so its 8 million hits per day
Just a hint
VJ
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yeah, because hardware never fails, right Wojciech?
it does. but this is software
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Wojciech Puchar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess it can, but in the past when hardware has failed for me, I
generally got some indicative errors in the logs.
hardware failures are different. rarely causes reboot, or reboots ramdomly
independent of what you
Hi,
I'm implementing a backup solution at work.We've bought a x86 server
with two hardware raid 5 with for a total storage capacity of about 7Tb.
For the software we are using for backups, the ideal scenario would be
to have just one big disk so that no space problems would appear.
I've
You cannot use fdisk slices/partitions with disks over 2TB. For those
GPT should be used. More info is available from here :
http://www.freebsd.org/projects/bigdisk
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 13:57 +0200, Matias Surdi wrote:
Hi,
I'm implementing a backup solution at work.We've bought a x86 server
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 15:32 -0700, John Pettitt wrote:
Slightly OT but since I'm going to run this on FreeBSD 7 I figured I'd
ask here ..
I have an application where data arrives in what is effectively
continuous stream (actually NMEA messages from an AIS receiver) and
I'd
like to
In response to Brad Penoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Brad Penoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In response to Brad Penoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have an application that runs on Linux or Mac OS X but
As far as I understand from the following sentence taken from the link
you are pointing and the text following it:
...Many systems don't require an MBR or GPT, and even PCs don't require
it if booting and inter-operating with other OS's is not required. The
next limit that comes in, though,
Jonathan McKeown:
We had a power failure last night, and this morning I found
that imapproxyd (running on a webserver which provides
webmail) had failed to start because it depends on imapd
(running on the mailserver, a different host), and imapproxyd
had won the startup race.
I need
If you only have FreeBSD installed on the box or if you don't need
slices/partitions you can just do newfs /dev/xxx (dedicate).
vinum should not be used on 6.x and above, gvinum (GEOM + vinum)
replaced it but I'm not sure if it's still actively
supported/developped .. (?)
Also, take a look at
On May 21, 2008, at 4:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
some users of FreeNAS which is based on FreeBSD 6.3 reported instant
reboots on systems with 2GB RAM (most of them use 4GB). The reboot
occurs right after displaying the FreeBSD loader menu. Most of them
told me that they can boot if
El día Friday, January 18, 2008 a las 10:41:28PM -0500, Garance A Drosehn
escribió:
At 9:14 AM -0500 1/2/08, Ed Maste wrote:
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 06:20:22PM +, James Jeffery wrote:
Before i end the toipic, anyone got any feeback on the Asus Eee (mini
laptops) with FreeBSD?
It
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:01:56AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
some users of FreeNAS which is based on FreeBSD 6.3 reported instant reboots
on systems with 2GB RAM (most of them use 4GB). The reboot occurs right
after displaying the FreeBSD loader menu. Most of them told me
On May 20, 2008, at 7:17 AM, Alan Gilmour wrote:
Hey all,
We have recently been getting a lot of traffic to one of our sites.
The CPU is consistently during busy periods using 100% utilisation.
When this happens we have approx 150 apache threads, and the loads
goes way above 15.
However
On May 21, 2008, at 8:05 AM, Chris Pratt wrote:
On May 20, 2008, at 7:17 AM, Alan Gilmour wrote:
Hey all,
We have recently been getting a lot of traffic to one of our sites.
The CPU is consistently during busy periods using 100% utilisation.
When this happens we have approx 150 apache
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 5:28 AM, bridd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Steve,
I saw your thread
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-usb/2008-April/004753.html
via googling for FreeBSD fxload equivalents. Did you get any further
with it?
I'm wondering, because I've got an m-audio USB
Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Friday, January 18, 2008 a las 10:41:28PM -0500, Garance A Drosehn
escribió:
At 9:14 AM -0500 1/2/08, Ed Maste wrote:
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 06:20:22PM +, James Jeffery wrote:
Before i end the toipic, anyone got any feeback on the Asus Eee
Hi everybody,
I am attempting to configure a BIND 9 name server that will be
authoritative for certain domains which will listen exclusively on IPv6.
This same box will also be a caching server for a handful of networks
(IPv6 and IPv4).
The way I have it set up is that the authoritative
Hi,
I'm implementing a backup solution at work.We've bought a x86 server
with two hardware raid 5 with for a total storage capacity of about 7Tb.
For the software we are using for backups, the ideal scenario would be
to have just one big disk so that no space problems would appear.
I've
Hi,
I currently have a webserver running Apache 2.2.8 inside of a FreeBSD
7.0 jail. It's running several virtualhosts, and it's doing great! My
problem is that I need to run an SSL enabled virtual host, and that
requires me to use an IP based virtual host. Most documentation
indicates that
Steve Bertrand wrote:
Hi everybody,
I am attempting to configure a BIND 9 name server that will be
authoritative for certain domains which will listen exclusively on IPv6.
This same box will also be a caching server for a handful of networks
(IPv6 and IPv4).
The way I have it set up is
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 6:09 AM, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In response to Brad Penoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Brad Penoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In response to Brad Penoff [EMAIL
In response to Brad Penoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 6:09 AM, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In response to Brad Penoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Brad Penoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Bill Moran [EMAIL
What is the best way to have a list that only certain users are able to
send to?
That sounds like you're getting into a full blown mailing0list package. I
set up the minimalist port for a small list last year. Small very easy
to config. I think it has the restriction you
On May 21, 2008, at 12:36 PM, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Brad Penoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 6:09 AM, Bill Moran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In response to Brad Penoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Brad Penoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, May
[sent the below message thru the freebsd-security list with no answers, hope
for more from freebsd-questions]
Recently started using vi macros.
When attempting to use one which accessed the external shell, got the following
message:
The ! command is not supported when the secure edit option
On 12/23/-58 20:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
some users of FreeNAS which is based on FreeBSD 6.3 reported instant reboots
on systems with 2GB RAM (most of them use 4GB). The reboot occurs right
after displaying the FreeBSD loader menu. Most of them told me that they can
boot if
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Vince Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
Hi all,
I have an ipw2200 bg. I can't make it work under FreeBSD 7 on AMD64.
This is the output of pciconf -lv
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:5:0: class=0x028000 card=0x27028086 chip=0x42208086
David Robillard escribió:
Hi,
I'm implementing a backup solution at work.We've bought a x86 server
with two hardware raid 5 with for a total storage capacity of about 7Tb.
For the software we are using for backups, the ideal scenario would be
to have just one big disk so that no space problems
Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Vince Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
Hi all,
I have an ipw2200 bg. I can't make it work under FreeBSD 7 on AMD64.
This is the output of pciconf -lv
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:5:0: class=0x028000
However, how can I make the FreeBSD (7.0) startup scripts load both
instances of BIND, each with it's own configuration?
I did something very similar. Run one of the bind instances in a jail --
especially with a little firewall rdr rules and similar trickery to
redirect
traffic into the
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 06:52:36PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Again, I'd rather do this without jails if possible, and at the same
time, be able to use the built in FBSD startup scripts if possible.
Can you not make use of BIND 9's view features? Possibly each view
using a
Hi list,
I'm installing some new Dell PowerEdge Servers and I have a question,
this servers came with 2 internal nics and FreeBSD recognize the
interfaces in inversal order, the nic marked as 1 in chassis is bce1
in ifconfig and nic marked as 2 is bce0.
Someone know why ? Do we have some way
I have an unusual situation that I suspect is not practical, but just
in case...
I have a class C network with a T1 to the internet. There are a
number of hosts on that network. Unfortunately the T1 line is just
part of a path with several additional links before it gets to the
Jonathan Chen wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 06:52:36PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Again, I'd rather do this without jails if possible, and at the same
time, be able to use the built in FBSD startup scripts if possible.
Can you not make use of BIND 9's view features? Possibly each view
At 06:35 PM 5/21/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
I have an unusual situation that I suspect is not practical, but just
in case...
I have a class C network with a T1 to the internet. There are a
number of hosts on that network. Unfortunately the T1 line is just
part of a path with several additional
Sure enough, ssh packets are
received by the host. The problem is that it does not respond on the
right interface. The routing table uses a default route through the
T1. Thats where the sshd responses are being sent.
If I understand correctly, this is only one box you need a correction
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 04:35:29PM -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
I have an unusual situation that I suspect is not practical, but just in
case...
I have a class C network with a T1 to the internet. There are a number of
hosts on that network. Unfortunately the T1 line is just part of a path
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 08:49:51AM +0200, VeeJay wrote:
Hello friends,
My employer is buying this Dell server and I would like to have your opinion
about the configuration.
Requirements are:
2 Websites with 3-4 million hits per month with video ads.
If it's 3-4 million hits per month as
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 08:01:50PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Jonathan Chen wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 06:52:36PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Again, I'd rather do this without jails if possible, and at the same
time, be able to use the built in FBSD startup scripts if possible.
Well, from what I read (I can't remember where), if I use views to do
this with only a single instance running, the problem arises that even
though the 'external' (requests for authoritative answers) clients can
and will get responses from the caching side of the server if the result
they are
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 01:51:03PM -0700, William O. Yates wrote:
[sent the below message thru the freebsd-security list with no
answers, hope for more from freebsd-questions]
Recently started using vi macros.
Show us the macro.
When attempting to use one which accessed the external
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 10:32 +0200, Christian Zachariasen wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Russell Schoen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Do you have a version that will run with an AMD Sempron 3100+, 1.8Ghz, 32
bit, X86 family processor?
Please do some reading before asking
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:21:05PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
[...]
My authoritative name server (service, eventually cluster) will
eventually house about 500 domains, which I want only recursive DNS
servers that come from the root .tld down to see (no caching).
The caching name server
Jonathan Chen wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:21:05PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
[...]
My authoritative name server (service, eventually cluster) will
eventually house about 500 domains, which I want only recursive DNS
servers that come from the root .tld down to see (no caching).
The
61 matches
Mail list logo
