On Wed, 21 May 2008 19:44:31 +0300, Manolis Kiagias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthias Apitz wrote:
>>>
>>> http://nighthack.org/wiki/EeeBSD
>>
>> Thanks for that hint. I'm thinking in buying such a device to have it
>> with me as a typewriter, mostly; normally I use FreeBSD 7.0-REL on m
Jonathan Chen wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:21:05PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
[...]
My authoritative name server (service, eventually cluster) will
eventually house about 500 domains, which I want only recursive DNS
servers that come from the root .tld down to see (no caching).
The ca
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:21:05PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
[...]
> My authoritative name server (service, eventually cluster) will
> eventually house about 500 domains, which I want only recursive DNS
> servers that come from the root .tld down to see (no caching).
>
> The caching name ser
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 10:32 +0200, Christian Zachariasen wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Russell Schoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Do you have a version that will run with an AMD Sempron 3100+, 1.8Ghz, 32
> > bit, X86 family processor?
> Please do some reading before ask
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 01:51:03PM -0700, William O. Yates wrote:
>
> [sent the below message thru the freebsd-security list with no
> answers, hope for more from freebsd-questions]
>
> Recently started using vi macros.
Show us the macro.
>
> When attempting to use one which accessed the extern
Well, from what I read (I can't remember where), if I use views to do
this with only a single instance running, the problem arises that even
though the 'external' (requests for authoritative answers) clients can
and will get responses from the caching side of the server if the result
they are a
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 08:01:50PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Jonathan Chen wrote:
> >On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 06:52:36PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> >
> >>Again, I'd rather do this without jails if possible, and at the same
> >>time, be able to use the built in FBSD startup scripts if possi
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 08:49:51AM +0200, VeeJay wrote:
>
> Hello friends,
>
> My employer is buying this Dell server and I would like to have your opinion
> about the configuration.
>
> Requirements are:
> 2 Websites with 3-4 million hits per month with video ads.
If it's "3-4 million hits per
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 04:35:29PM -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
> I have an unusual situation that I suspect is not practical, but just in
> case...
>
> I have a class C network with a T1 to the internet. There are a number of
> hosts on that network. Unfortunately the T1 line is just part of a pa
Sure enough, ssh packets are
received by the host. The problem is that it does not respond on the
right interface. The routing table uses a default route through the
T1. Thats where the sshd responses are being sent.
If I understand correctly, this is only one box you need a correction
for
At 06:35 PM 5/21/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
I have an unusual situation that I suspect is not practical, but just
in case...
I have a class C network with a T1 to the internet. There are a
number of hosts on that network. Unfortunately the T1 line is just
part of a path with several additional l
Jonathan Chen wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 06:52:36PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Again, I'd rather do this without jails if possible, and at the same
time, be able to use the built in FBSD startup scripts if possible.
Can you not make use of BIND 9's "view" features? Possibly each view
us
I have an unusual situation that I suspect is not practical, but just
in case...
I have a class C network with a T1 to the internet. There are a
number of hosts on that network. Unfortunately the T1 line is just
part of a path with several additional links before it gets to the
upstream
Hi list,
I'm installing some new Dell PowerEdge Servers and I have a question,
this servers came with 2 internal nics and FreeBSD recognize the
interfaces in inversal order, the nic marked as 1 in chassis is bce1
in ifconfig and nic marked as 2 is bce0.
Someone know why ? Do we have some way to
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 06:52:36PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Again, I'd rather do this without jails if possible, and at the same
> time, be able to use the built in FBSD startup scripts if possible.
Can you not make use of BIND 9's "view" features? Possibly each view
using a match-destinat
However, how can I make the FreeBSD (7.0) startup scripts load both
instances of BIND, each with it's own configuration?
I did something very similar. Run one of the bind instances in a jail --
especially with a little firewall rdr rules and similar trickery to
redirect
traffic into the appr
Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Vince Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
Hi all,
I have an ipw2200 bg. I can't make it work under FreeBSD 7 on AMD64.
This is the output of pciconf -lv
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:5:0: class=0x028000 card=0
David Robillard escribió:
Hi,
I'm implementing a backup solution at work.We've bought a x86 server
with two hardware raid 5 with for a total storage capacity of about 7Tb.
For the software we are using for backups, the ideal scenario would be
to have just one "big disk" so that no space problems
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Vince Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have an ipw2200 bg. I can't make it work under FreeBSD 7 on AMD64.
>>
>> This is the output of pciconf -lv
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:5:0: class=0x028000 card=0x27028086
[sent the below message thru the freebsd-security list with no answers, hope
for more from freebsd-questions]
Recently started using vi macros.
When attempting to use one which accessed the external shell, got the following
message:
"The ! command is not supported when the secure edit option i
On 12/23/-58 20:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> some users of FreeNAS which is based on FreeBSD 6.3 reported instant reboots
> on systems with > 2GB RAM (most of them use 4GB). The reboot occurs right
> after displaying the FreeBSD loader menu. Most of them told me that they can
> boo
On May 21, 2008, at 12:36 PM, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to "Brad Penoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 6:09 AM, Bill Moran
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In response to "Brad Penoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Brad Penoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > What is the best way to have a list that only certain users are able to
> > > send to?
> >
> >
> > That sounds like you're getting into a full blown mailing0list package. I
> > set up the "minimalist" port for a small list last year. Small & very easy
> > to config. I think it has t
In response to "Brad Penoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 6:09 AM, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In response to "Brad Penoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Brad Penoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:54 PM, B
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 6:09 AM, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In response to "Brad Penoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Brad Penoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> In response to "B
Steve Bertrand wrote:
Hi everybody,
I am attempting to configure a BIND 9 name server that will be
authoritative for certain domains which will listen exclusively on IPv6.
This same box will also be a caching server for a handful of networks
(IPv6 and IPv4).
The way I have it set up is tha
Hi,
I currently have a webserver running Apache 2.2.8 inside of a FreeBSD
7.0 jail. It's running several virtualhosts, and it's doing great! My
problem is that I need to run an SSL enabled virtual host, and that
requires me to use an IP based virtual host. Most documentation
indicates that
> Hi,
> I'm implementing a backup solution at work.We've bought a x86 server
> with two hardware raid 5 with for a total storage capacity of about 7Tb.
>
> For the software we are using for backups, the ideal scenario would be
> to have just one "big disk" so that no space problems would appear.
>
Hi everybody,
I am attempting to configure a BIND 9 name server that will be
authoritative for certain domains which will listen exclusively on IPv6.
This same box will also be a caching server for a handful of networks
(IPv6 and IPv4).
The way I have it set up is that the authoritative and
Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Friday, January 18, 2008 a las 10:41:28PM -0500, Garance A Drosehn
escribió:
At 9:14 AM -0500 1/2/08, Ed Maste wrote:
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 06:20:22PM +, James Jeffery wrote:
Before i end the toipic, anyone got any feeback on the Asus Eee
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 5:28 AM, bridd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> I saw your thread
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-usb/2008-April/004753.html
> via googling for FreeBSD fxload equivalents. Did you get any further
> with it?
>
> I'm wondering, because I've got an m-aud
On May 21, 2008, at 8:05 AM, Chris Pratt wrote:
On May 20, 2008, at 7:17 AM, Alan Gilmour wrote:
Hey all,
We have recently been getting a lot of traffic to one of our sites.
The CPU is consistently during busy periods using 100% utilisation.
When this happens we have approx 150 apache threa
On May 20, 2008, at 7:17 AM, Alan Gilmour wrote:
Hey all,
We have recently been getting a lot of traffic to one of our sites.
The CPU is consistently during busy periods using 100% utilisation.
When this happens we have approx 150 apache threads, and the loads
goes way above 15.
However recen
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:01:56AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> some users of FreeNAS which is based on FreeBSD 6.3 reported instant reboots
> on systems with > 2GB RAM (most of them use 4GB). The reboot occurs right
> after displaying the FreeBSD loader menu. Most of them told m
El día Friday, January 18, 2008 a las 10:41:28PM -0500, Garance A Drosehn
escribió:
> At 9:14 AM -0500 1/2/08, Ed Maste wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 06:20:22PM +, James Jeffery wrote:
> >
> >> Before i end the toipic, anyone got any feeback on the Asus Eee (mini
> >> laptops) with FreeBS
On May 21, 2008, at 4:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
some users of FreeNAS which is based on FreeBSD 6.3 reported instant
reboots on systems with > 2GB RAM (most of them use 4GB). The reboot
occurs right after displaying the FreeBSD loader menu. Most of them
told me that they can boot if
If you only have FreeBSD installed on the box or if you don't need
slices/partitions you can just do newfs /dev/xxx (dedicate).
vinum should not be used on 6.x and above, gvinum (GEOM + vinum)
replaced it but I'm not sure if it's still actively
supported/developped .. (?)
Also, take a look at gco
Jonathan McKeown:
> We had a power failure last night, and this morning I found
> that imapproxyd (running on a webserver which provides
> webmail) had failed to start because it depends on imapd
> (running on the mailserver, a different host), and imapproxyd
> had won the startup race.
>
> I
As far as I understand from the following sentence taken from the link
you are pointing and the text following it:
"...Many systems don't require an MBR or GPT, and even PCs don't require
it if booting and inter-operating with other OS's is not required. The
next limit that comes in, though, i
In response to "Brad Penoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Brad Penoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> In response to "Brad Penoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>>
> >>> I have an application that runs
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 15:32 -0700, John Pettitt wrote:
>
>
> Slightly OT but since I'm going to run this on FreeBSD 7 I figured I'd
> ask here ..
>
> I have an application where data arrives in what is effectively
> continuous stream (actually NMEA messages from an AIS receiver) and
I'd
> lik
You cannot use fdisk slices/partitions with disks over 2TB. For those
GPT should be used. More info is available from here :
http://www.freebsd.org/projects/bigdisk
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 13:57 +0200, Matias Surdi wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm implementing a backup solution at work.We've bought a x86 server
Hi,
I'm implementing a backup solution at work.We've bought a x86 server
with two hardware raid 5 with for a total storage capacity of about 7Tb.
For the software we are using for backups, the ideal scenario would be
to have just one "big disk" so that no space problems would appear.
I've tr
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Wojciech Puchar <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess it can, but in the past when hardware has failed for me, I
>> generally got some indicative errors in the logs.
>>
>
> hardware failures are different. rarely causes reboot, or reboots ramdomly
> independent of
Yes,
but its 4 million each.. so its 8 million hits per day
Just a hint
VJ
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
I guess it can, but in the past when hardware has failed for me, I
generally got some indicative errors in the logs.
hardware failures are different. rarely causes reboot, or reboots ramdomly
independent of what you do.
with bad memory it usually produces sig11 or similar errors much more
of
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Yeah, because hardware never fails, right Wojciech?
it does. but this is software failu
a problem when I run on FreeBSD (6.3 or 7). The issue is the memory
footprint for the application (osubw_sctpclien below) is quite large;
on Linux it can be as much as 950 MB in resident memory, according to
top. However, on FreeBSD I start to get ENOMEM always around the time
my resident memory
Requirements are:
2 Websites with 3-4 million hits per month with video ads.
which means 10 per day. some time ago i wa doing somethink like that
on 486/100.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listi
We had a power failure last night, and this morning I found that imapproxyd
(running on a webserver which provides webmail) had failed to start because
it depends on imapd (running on the mailserver, a different host), and
imapproxyd had won the startup race.
I need to prevent the race by makin
I guess it can, but in the past when hardware has failed for me, I
generally got some indicative errors in the logs.
I managed to move a lot of the intensive operations across to another
server and for the moment,its working much better on the other server
which has a newer kernel.
Cheers
Alan
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Brad Penoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In response to "Brad Penoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
>>> I have an application that runs on Linux or Mac OS X but seems to have
>>> a problem when I r
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Wojciech Puchar <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then, if crash dumps are enabled, it could be a HW failure..
>>
>
> no it is not. i have similar problems but not with apache, it is certainly
> FreeBSD bug that causes it to randomly reboot under certain types of load.
Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have an ipw2200 bg. I can't make it work under FreeBSD 7 on AMD64.
>
> This is the output of pciconf -lv
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:5:0: class=0x028000 card=0x27028086 chip=0x42208086
> rev=0x05 hdr=0x00
> vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
>
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Russell Schoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Do you have a version that will run with an AMD Sempron 3100+, 1.8Ghz, 32
> bit, X86 family processor?
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.f
Hello,
some users of FreeNAS which is based on FreeBSD 6.3 reported instant reboots on
systems with > 2GB RAM (most of them use 4GB). The reboot occurs right after
displaying the FreeBSD loader menu. Most of them told me that they can boot if
they reduce RAM to <= 2GB.
We are using the followi
Hi,
Do you have a version that will run with an AMD Sempron 3100+, 1.8Ghz,
32 bit, X86 family processor?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAI
On Tuesday 20 May 2008 16:44, RW wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2008 11:33:50 +0200
>
> Jonathan McKeown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 20 May 2008 02:41, RW wrote:
> > > On Mon, 19 May 2008 21:46:03 +1200
> > >
> > > Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > find /usr/src \( -name M
There's a tip in the FreeBSD fortunes database that says:
> Want to strip UTF-8 BOM(Bye Order Mark) from given files?
>
> sed -e '1s/^\xef\xbb\xbf//' < bomfile > newfile
I can't make it work, and I can't find any other method to
work with hexa codes in scripts or on the command line so
I'm kind-
59 matches
Mail list logo
