Thunar (xfce 4.4) along with hal has no problem automounting an SD
card... unless that card is write-protected.
There's a delay while the system tries and thinks it fails to mount the
card--twice. Eject the card and the system reboots as if it was
mounted. Try a clean shutdown and the system
Gabe wrote:
Its a conspiracy. Is it safe to say that it is in fact gmail related?
-Original Message-
From: Odhiambo Washington
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 12:41 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Double Posts
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Jerry wrote:
On Fri, 1
On Thursday 11 December 2008 12:40:10 Jerry wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:11:26 +0100
>
> Mel wrote:
> >6) Disable password based logins and use keys only.
>
> Personally, I have always used 'keys' instead of passwords. Given
> enough time and resources, any password can be cracked. I rea
Glen Barber wrote:
Gary Hartl said:
I'm considering just wiping the system clean and starting from scratch to
say either 6.4-release or 7.0 release.
For what it's worth, I've (so far) had 50% luck with 7.1. My home server runs nothing special, mostly development stuff and the occasional X se
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 02:28:54 +0200
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> It seems natural
> to return the favor now, and reply to *all* questions that I can help
> with; even if their relation to FreeBSD is very 'weak'.
>
i think that is both very generous, appropriate and in keeping with the
spirit of free
fixer writes:
> FreeBSD localhost 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 12
> 11:05:30 UTC 2007
> r...@dessler.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i386
> localhost#
>
>
> I just discovered flash drives. They are very easy to use on Windows.
> I don't know if FreeBSD supports these dri
"Valentin Bud" writes:
> handbook but as you guys said it's FBSD only
Well, aside from other Unix-like systems. Certainly Linux, MacOS,
anything from Sun (which invented it), all the other BSDs, Ultrix, and
probably anything else that ends in 'ix'. It might be a bit tricky to
get running with
"Valentin Bud" writes:
> If you only have UNIX systems in LAN. But in my case i have Linux + FreeBSD
> (server). From the handbook
> NIS only works between FBSDs. Am i missing something?
Apparently. Quoting the Handbook:
NIS, which stands for Network Information Services, was developed
b
On December 12, 2008 07:28:54 pm Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 00:22:15 +0100 (CET), Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
> >> There is _nothing_ that is inherently "server oriented" about the main
> >> FreeBSD tree, and it hasn't "split" to anything of the sort.
> >
> > exactly! FreeBSD is un
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 02:28:54AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 00:22:15 +0100 (CET), Wojciech Puchar
> wrote:
> >> There is _nothing_ that is inherently "server oriented" about the main
> >> FreeBSD tree, and it hasn't "split" to anything of the sort.
> >
> > exactly! F
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 00:22:15 +0100 (CET), Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
>> There is _nothing_ that is inherently "server oriented" about the main
>> FreeBSD tree, and it hasn't "split" to anything of the sort.
>
> exactly! FreeBSD is unix oriented!
>
> everything else depends on what you install.
>
> th
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:56:30 -0800
Gabe wrote:
>-Original Message-
>From: Odhiambo Washington
>Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 12:41 PM
>To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: Double Posts
>
>On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Jerry wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 08:38:17 -0500
Its a conspiracy. Is it safe to say that it is in fact gmail related?
-Original Message-
From: Odhiambo Washington
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 12:41 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Double Posts
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Jerry wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 08
There is _nothing_ that is inherently "server oriented" about the main
FreeBSD tree, and it hasn't "split" to anything of the sort.
exactly! FreeBSD is unix oriented!
everything else depends on what you install.
that's why it would be good to finally introduce moderation on that list -
to cut
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:28:26 +0300, Usr Random wrote:
> Hi dear sirs!
>
> Correct please if me wrong, but as i know the source tree of FreeBSD
> already split into two parts - Servers-oriented (FreeBSD) and PC-BSD
> (Desktop oriented) ? Or team from PC-BSD is not FreeBSD peoples? WBR
Not really,
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:46:03 +0100 (CET), Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
> if someone like to compare KDE with windoze - OK but NOT THIS GROUP!
Hold the topic censorship horses there a bit...
The freebsd-questions list is a general discussion forum where FreeBSD
users exchange opinions, help, support a
Hi dear sirs!
Correct please if me wrong, but as i know the source tree of FreeBSD already
split into two parts - Servers-oriented (FreeBSD) and PC-BSD (Desktop oriented)
? Or team from PC-BSD is not FreeBSD peoples? WBR
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.o
On Dec 12, 2008, at 10:19, Dan wrote:
Wojciech Puchar(woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)@2008.12.12 14:12:45
+0100:
this case (though it's very complicated to set up, especially
the first
why it is "right" solution?
Interoperability. Today, with Linux, tomorrow, Windows or Mac OS X.
so no
Passive Income - Up to $37,500.00
This is not a joke! Open this site now and look how easy you can get
cash only within 5 hours. If you not trust, do not enter to our site.
But once you open our site, you'll know how easy to make home income.
by a larger group of users. If FBSD wants to remain a 'niche' product
with limited support for third party products, then the question of why
FBSD is not more popular with hardware vendors has been answered.
That's exactly what some people want -- though it's not a universal
FreeBSD goal, obviou
I mean seriously, has this helped anything at all?
no. all i want is to stop all stupid topics about:
- KDE/Gnome/other crap (or great things for somebody)
BECAUSE IT'S NOT PART OF FREEBSD. FreeBSD has nothing to this, except
KDE/Gnome/whatever can be run on it
- support of flash in Opera/F
Brian Whalen wrote:
michael wrote:
Brian Whalen wrote:
michael wrote:
has anyone stopped at all during this discussion and considered
what you're arguing about? you're all complaining about a SERVER os
that doesn't have an nvidia driver for its 64bit implementation and
Wojciech.
I mean s
because linux got exactly that way and it sucks now.
That's not what I'd call a productive response, nor is it well supported.
what kind of productivity to you request from such topic. it doesn't have
to be productive. it's just fact.
___
freebs
michael wrote:
has anyone stopped at all during this discussion and considered what
you're arguing about? you're all complaining about a SERVER os that
doesn't have an nvidia driver for its 64bit implementation and Wojciech.
I mean seriously, has this helped anything at all? is ranting on here
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 03:02:28PM -0500, Jerry wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:32:59 +0100 (CET)
> Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>
> >NVidia MUST INCLUDE full documentation of their hardware.
> >this is normal - hardware manufacturer produces hardware, programmers
> >do make support for it.
> >
> >what
has anyone stopped at all during this discussion and considered what
you're arguing about? you're all complaining about a SERVER os that
doesn't have an nvidia driver for its 64bit implementation and Wojciech.
I mean seriously, has this helped anything at all? is ranting on here
about those two
Chad Perrin wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:07:45AM -0800, prad wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:11:48 -0700
Chad Perrin wrote:
I don't recall anyone saying "I'm with such-and-such a FreeBSD
development team, and these are the reasons we aren't going to do
anything about that at this
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 01:35:46PM -0500, Michael Powell wrote:
> Chad Perrin wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:05:20PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >> >
> >> >So . . . are you saying that increased support for 3D accelerated
> >> >graphics is not an "improvement", and should therefore no
Chad Perrin wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 07:15:35PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
cropping up and saying the equivalent of "If we work on that stuff,
FreeBSD will just become MS Windows, and it'll suck." I disagree with
because linux got exactly that way and it sucks now.
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:07:45AM -0800, prad wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:11:48 -0700
> Chad Perrin wrote:
>
> > I don't recall anyone saying "I'm with such-and-such a FreeBSD
> > development team, and these are the reasons we aren't going to do
> > anything about that at this time:".
> >
>
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 07:15:35PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >cropping up and saying the equivalent of "If we work on that stuff,
> >FreeBSD will just become MS Windows, and it'll suck." I disagree with
> because linux got exactly that way and it sucks now.
Are you reading this, prad?
--
Hi there,
> For example, RC2 builds were scheduled for 29 September 2008. When
> that day comes (or same week perhaps), whoever has the ability to
> change the release schedule page should update it regardless of what
> happened. If RC2 builds started, that should be reflected in the
I have offer
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 02:44:27PM -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
> michael writes:
>
> > why don't we all just say it. freebsd sucks because it isn't cp/m.
>
> CP/? Poser. I want my TWENEX back.
> :-)
What do you have against ITS?
--
Chad Perrin [ content licensed OWL: http://owl.ap
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:35:59 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> They do this to hide their hardware faults that way - that's the true
> reason they do this.
>
this is really interesting. so the 'trade secrets' is largely a
smoke-screen.
i imagine this would also apply to propriety software as
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:35:59 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> They do this to hide their hardware faults that way - that's the true
> reason they do this.
>
> With new hardware produced every year it MUST be buggy and certainly
> there are thousands of hardware bugs.
>
> with "secret" driv
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:20:12 -0800
"Joe S" wrote:
>On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Maxim Khitrov
>wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Glen Barber
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Maxim Khitrov
>>> wrote:
For example, RC2 builds were scheduled for 29 September 2008.
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Jerry wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 08:38:17 -0500
> "Gary Hartl" wrote:
>
> >Anyone have any clue what I would be getting two of every message
> >posted to the group?
> >
> >It started yesterday and nothing has changed on my end (that I am
> >aware of)
> >
> >I'm
NVidia MUST INCLUDE full documentation of their hardware.
this is normal - hardware manufacturer produces hardware, programmers
do make support for it.
what is common today isn't normal.
I honestly have no idea what you are trying to communicate here.
exactly what i wrote. the problem is that
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
>>> For example, RC2 builds were scheduled for 29 September 2008. When
>>> that day comes (or same week perhaps), whoever has the
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:02:28 -0500
Jerry wrote:
> Market share increases by making your product more accessible and
> usable by a larger group of users.
>
you make a good point here, jerry.
what i'm wondering about though is if the 'normal' business model
should be applied to fbsd or any opensour
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:32:59 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>NVidia MUST INCLUDE full documentation of their hardware.
>this is normal - hardware manufacturer produces hardware, programmers
>do make support for it.
>
>what is common today isn't normal.
I honestly have no idea what you are tr
Steve Franks wrote:
Anyone know of a HD radio receiver (preferably USB, put PCI/PCIe ok)
that we have drivers for? I assume it would show up as a usb audio
device and a usb hid device? Ok, no doubt I'm being optimistic that
such a thing actually even exists
Steve
Here is a Linux story, m
Robert Huff wrote:
michael writes:
why don't we all just say it. freebsd sucks because it isn't cp/m.
CP/? Poser. I want my TWENEX back.
:-)
Robert Huff
haha, old man.
___
freebsd-q
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
>> For example, RC2 builds were scheduled for 29 September 2008. When
>> that day comes (or same week perhaps), whoever has the ability to
>> change the release schedule page should update
michael writes:
> why don't we all just say it. freebsd sucks because it isn't cp/m.
CP/? Poser. I want my TWENEX back.
:-)
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fr
Anyone know of a HD radio receiver (preferably USB, put PCI/PCIe ok)
that we have drivers for? I assume it would show up as a usb audio
device and a usb hid device? Ok, no doubt I'm being optimistic that
such a thing actually even exists
Steve
___
f
I disagree. I believe, rather, that support for closed hardware specs
isn't *as* important -- but is still at least somewhat important.
My reservation to the 3D driver thing is it is setting a very dangerous
precedent if the solution involves allowing a third party commercial
enterprise to dic
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
>
> This discussion has come up countless number of times and the answer
> is always the same - all of us would rather wait for quality, but we'd
> also like some very rough timeline estimates that don't fall back into
> the past. Notice that I
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:59:46 +0200
"Ivailo Bonev" wrote:
> What's your problem with Lada?! :-D
> They make cars (especially Niva) to drive everywhere!
>
well may be they could work on the nvidia drivers.
they already have 4 of the 6 letters correct.
> Just my 2 euro cents... lol
>
ok ok i admi
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:35:46 -0500
Michael Powell wrote:
>My reservation to the 3D driver thing is it is setting a very dangerous
>precedent if the solution involves allowing a third party commercial
>enterprise to dictate features FreeBSD "must include" before they will
>support it.
>
>In this c
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
>>
>>"When it's ready" used to be the scheduling principle.
>>Then came 5.0 debacle: behind schedule big-time (and arguably
>> not ready when it went out the door).
>>
Chad Perrin wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:45:20PM -0600, Tyson Boellstorff wrote:
On Thursday 11 December 2008 19:58:14 Chad Perrin wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 05:00:11PM -0800, prad wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:28:13 -0700
i don't think that's really what is happenin
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:11:48 -0700
Chad Perrin wrote:
> I don't recall anyone saying "I'm with such-and-such a FreeBSD
> development team, and these are the reasons we aren't going to do
> anything about that at this time:".
>
i don't either, but these development teams do exist:
http://www.free
Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:05:20PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>> >
>> >So . . . are you saying that increased support for 3D accelerated
>> >graphics is not an "improvement", and should therefore not be considered
>> >a worthy goal?
>>
>> full support of open hardware stan
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:04:21 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> there are excellent opensource software and there are crappy
> opensource bloatware.
>
> just being opensource doesn't mean anything
>
agreed, but we prefer to support opensource from a philosophical
perspective even when the qual
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
>
>"When it's ready" used to be the scheduling principle.
>Then came 5.0 debacle: behind schedule big-time (and arguably
> not ready when it went out the door).
>I remember discussion afterwards, where there seemed to be
>
- Original Message -
From: "Tyson Boellstorff"
To:
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 7:45 AM
Subject: Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors
On Thursday 11 December 2008 19:58:14 Chad Perrin wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 05:00:11PM -0800, prad wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2008
Wojciech Puchar(woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)@2008.12.12 14:12:45 +0100:
this case (though it's very complicated to set up, especially the first
>>>
>>> why it is "right" solution?
>>
>> Interoperability. Today, with Linux, tomorrow, Windows or Mac OS X.
>
> so not "right" but interoperable.
cropping up and saying the equivalent of "If we work on that stuff,
FreeBSD will just become MS Windows, and it'll suck." I disagree with
because linux got exactly that way and it sucks now.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.f
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:05:20PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >
> >So . . . are you saying that increased support for 3D accelerated
> >graphics is not an "improvement", and should therefore not be considered
> >a worthy goal?
>
> full support of open hardware standards is an requirement.
>
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 09:50:36PM -0800, prad wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:58:14 -0700
> Chad Perrin wrote:
>
> > So . . . are you saying that increased support for 3D accelerated
> > graphics is not an "improvement", and should therefore not be
> > considered a worthy goal?
> >
> no. access
Joe S writes:
> >> What on earth is going on with release scheduling?
> >
> > Two words: volunteer project
> >
> > I would propose to do away with the release schedule altogether, or make
> > it very succinct;
> >
> > next release: when it's done.
>
> What? Isn't that the Linux kernel
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:45:20PM -0600, Tyson Boellstorff wrote:
> On Thursday 11 December 2008 19:58:14 Chad Perrin wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 05:00:11PM -0800, prad wrote:
> > > On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:28:13 -0700
> > >
> > > i don't think that's really what is happening, chad.
> > > i t
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 07:04:18PM -0800, prad wrote:
>
> > Each time, I have very
> > clearly stated my disagreement with his estimation of FreeBSD as
> > being thoroughly beaten by MS Windows in that area, with that URL
> > provided as evidence to back my claim.
> >
> the problem is that is you
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 08:38:17 -0500
"Gary Hartl" wrote:
>Anyone have any clue what I would be getting two of every message
>posted to the group?
>
>It started yesterday and nothing has changed on my end (that I am
>aware of)
>
>I'm using outlook 2008, picking up from gmail.
>
>Thanks
>
>Gary
Co
--
From: "Joe S"
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 12:20 PM
To: "Roland Smith"
Cc: ; "Jonathan McKeown"
Subject: Re: Release schedules
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:01 AM, Roland Smith wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 12:59:24PM +0200, Jonathan Mc
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:58:02 +0100
Bernt Hansson wrote:
>
>
>Julien Cigar skrev:
>> On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 00:23 +0100, Bernt Hansson wrote:
>>> Julien Cigar said the following on 2008-12-11 14:40:
- Altough ports are fantastic, building things like OpenOffice
or ... is just inhuman, esp
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:01 AM, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 12:59:24PM +0200, Jonathan McKeown wrote:
>> I've been biting my tongue about this because I'm not sure that I can offer
>> any help or useful suggestions, but here goes...
>>
>> What on earth is going on with release s
On 12/12/08 1:08 AM, Mike Clarke wrote:
> As of php 5.2.7, pcre extension is distributed with the core php5
> package, and not as a standalone module anymore."
Thanks much. So, I can safely deinstall the php5-pcre port?
dn
___
freebsd-questions@fr
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:29:05AM +, AN wrote:
> I'm trying to configure a wireless adapter on an IBM Thinkpad R51, and
> need some help. I followed the iwi man page, but the card is not
> recognized. I have the following in /boot/loader.conf:
> cat /boot/loader.conf
>
> if_iwi_load="YES"
On Friday 12 December 2008 05:11:26 Manolis Kiagias wrote:
> fixer wrote:
> > I just discovered flash drives. They are very easy to use on Windows.
> > I don't know if FreeBSD supports these drives. But if FreeBSD does,
> > I need instructions on "how-to-use". Thanks in advance for anyone who
>
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 10:55:49AM +0800, hitech resources wrote:
> *HI, i have PowerEdge(TM) 840, Quad Core Xeon Pro X3220 Processor, so what
> is the suitable version of FreeBSD i could use. I actually want to use it
> for server purposes. TQ
Go with the latest RELEASE. If you can wait a short
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Gary Hartl wrote:
Anyone have any clue what I would be getting two of every message posted to
the group?
It started yesterday and nothing has changed on my end (that I am aware of)
I'm using outlook 2008, picking up from gmail.
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Gary Hartl wrote:
> Anyone have any clue what I would be getting two of every message posted to
> the group?
>
> It started yesterday and nothing has changed on my end (that I am aware of)
>
> I'm using outlook 2008, picking up from gmail.
Perhaps it's Outlook 2
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Valentin Bud wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Wojciech Puchar <
>> woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> this case (though it's very complicated to set up, especially the first
> why it is "right" solution?
>
Inter
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:58 AM, Gunther Mayer
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm trying to set up a really simple, single account write only ftp service.
> So I put
>
> ftpd_enable="YES"
> ftpd_flags="-o -d"
>
> in my rc.conf and started the ftp server. Now I have a special password
> enabled user account
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> hitech resources wrote:
>
>> *HI, i have PowerEdge(TM) 840, Quad Core Xeon Pro X3220 Processor, so what
>> is the suitable version of FreeBSD i could use. I actually want to use it
>> for server purposes. TQ
>
> 7
>
And amd64 also :)
--
Wi
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 02:35:43PM -0800, Noah wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> sometimes I find there one or two processes with the command name of
> 'dialog' tacking the cpu on my freebsd machines. any clues what creates
> this situation and how I can circumvent the problem? It appears to
> happen ar
2008/12/12 abedini :
> Hi all dear
>
> I have laptop acer 4220 and I need to install FreeBSD.
>
> This laptop have sata HDD how can install FreeBSD in this system.
>
>
Hello.
If you need a desktop environment you can try PC-BSD
(http://www.pcbsd.org/), it's easy and fast to set-up. I believe it
wi
Valentin Bud wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Wojciech Puchar <
> woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote:
>
>> this case (though it's very complicated to set up, especially the first
why it is "right" solution?
>>> Interoperability. Today, with Linux, tomorrow, Windows or Mac OS
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 14:12 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >>> this case (though it's very complicated to set up, especially the first
> >>
> >> why it is "right" solution?
> >
> > Interoperability. Today, with Linux, tomorrow, Windows or Mac OS X.
>
> so not "right" but interoperable. if i do ha
Julien Cigar wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 13:26 +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
>> 2008/12/12 Wojciech Puchar :
I agree - NIS is easiest to setup, but LDAP is the right solution in
this case (though it's very complicated to set up, especially the first
>>> why it is "right" solution?
>> Intero
Anyone have any clue what I would be getting two of every message posted to
the group?
It started yesterday and nothing has changed on my end (that I am aware of)
I'm using outlook 2008, picking up from gmail.
Thanks
Gary
___
freebsd-questions@f
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Wojciech Puchar <
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote:
> this case (though it's very complicated to set up, especially the first
>>>
>>> why it is "right" solution?
>>>
>>
>> Interoperability. Today, with Linux, tomorrow, Windows or Mac OS X.
>>
>
> so not "
In response to "abedini" :
> Hi all dear
>
> I have laptop acer 4220 and I need to install FreeBSD.
>
> This laptop have sata HDD how can install FreeBSD in this system.
Are you having difficulty? What have you tried. Quite honestly, I
don't understand the question.
--
Bill Moran
http://ww
this case (though it's very complicated to set up, especially the first
why it is "right" solution?
Interoperability. Today, with Linux, tomorrow, Windows or Mac OS X.
so not "right" but interoperable. if i do have only unix systems in LAN,
NIS is much better easier and faster.
for window
Hi,
I'm running a gvinum raid array with 4x80G drives. This raid is running
for 4 Years now. Today i found out that the status in degraded. All
drives are up but on subdisk is stale. How can get the raid out of
degraded mode. I have attached the output of gvinum l
Greeting
Estartu
--
--
look at gosa its a fairly well rounded ldap administration suite, probably
more then you might need, but it covers alot of the services
https://oss.gonicus.de/labs/gosa/
or potentially even Zivios might fit your needs
http://www.zivios.org/
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Julien Cigar wrote:
Julien Cigar writes:
> Off-topic, but do you know any good tool other than gq/phpldapadmin to
> manage/browse/... an LDAP server ? At the moment I've my own set of LDIF
> files that I use with ldap[add|delete|modify], but it's not very
> "flexible" ..
> A ncurses tool would be perfect.
You may t
Hello Mr. Abedini and all the others by that matter,
I don't want to be rude but do you remember the time when we used to
send letters. Any of those letter had a Subject. E-mail communications are
based
on those letters (the concept) and they do have a Subject line on which you
should
fill a smal
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
> fixer wrote:
>
>> FreeBSD localhost 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 12 11:05:30
>> UTC 2007 r...@dessler.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i386
>> localhost#
>>
>>
>> I just discovered flash drives. They are very ea
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 13:26 +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
> 2008/12/12 Wojciech Puchar :
> >> I agree - NIS is easiest to setup, but LDAP is the right solution in
> >> this case (though it's very complicated to set up, especially the first
> >
> > why it is "right" solution?
>
> Interoperability. Today
Hi all dear
I have laptop acer 4220 and I need to install FreeBSD.
This laptop have sata HDD how can install FreeBSD in this system.
Mohammad Abedini
Site Acquisition Supervisor ( AHV )
Tel : 06113387881
06113921249
Mobile :09179397499
Hello list,
Thank you everyone for your input. I now know what to look for. Gave it a
read at NIS in the
handbook but as you guys said it's FBSD only so because of the
interoperability i think i will go with
LDAP.
I'll just have to check if (i suppose it does) that particular linux distro
"is o
2008/12/12 Wojciech Puchar :
>> I agree - NIS is easiest to setup, but LDAP is the right solution in
>> this case (though it's very complicated to set up, especially the first
>
> why it is "right" solution?
Interoperability. Today, with Linux, tomorrow, Windows or Mac OS X.
Besides, it scales wel
I'm trying to configure a wireless adapter on an IBM Thinkpad R51, and
need some help. I followed the iwi man page, but the card is not
recognized. I have the following in /boot/loader.conf:
cat /boot/loader.conf
if_iwi_load="YES"
wlan_load="YES"
firmware_load="YES"
loader_logo=beastie
snd_ic
fixer wrote:
FreeBSD localhost 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 12
11:05:30 UTC 2007
r...@dessler.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i386
localhost#
I just discovered flash drives. They are very easy to use on Windows.
I don't know if FreeBSD supports these drives. But
I agree - NIS is easiest to setup, but LDAP is the right solution in
this case (though it's very complicated to set up, especially the first
why it is "right" solution?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
So . . . are you saying that increased support for 3D accelerated
graphics is not an "improvement", and should therefore not be considered
a worthy goal?
full support of open hardware standards is an requirement.
support for closed hardware standards isn't important.
__
i don't disagree with you that opensource stuff is much better even if
they don't have certain things. however, is this really a freebsd issue
there are excellent opensource software and there are crappy opensource
bloatware.
just being opensource doesn't mean anything
___
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
