On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 08:13:07 -0500
Arnason, Arni [EMAIL PROTECTED] granted us these pearls of wisdom:
8.3.3 is in /usr/sbin
9 went into /usr/local/sbin
modified rc.conf to point to the
new binary
named_program=/usr/local/sbin/named
but I'm still stuck with 8.3.3
ps shows my named
it will host. The only daemons running in each jail (for
now) are cron and sshd, and each jail has a single wheel user. Some might call this
the beginnings of a virtual server?
This host server runs named. For now, I tell my home computer to use the host server's
public IP address as my only DNS
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 06:46:51PM -0600, Chris wrote:
At least pings from the outside world can get to the host server
but once at the host server, how do I get that traffic routed to the
correct jail/website (local IP address)?
By the sounds of it you have one external IP address but
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 08:13:07 -0500
Arnason, Arni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
8.3.3 is in /usr/sbin
9 went into /usr/local/sbin
modified rc.conf to point to the
new binary
named_program=/usr/local/sbin/named
but I'm still stuck with 8.3.3
ps shows my named up and running but a
which
I've been trying to upgrade named to version 9
but seem to be missing something
Currently have: FreeBSD 4.6.2 with named 8.3.3
downloaded, configured and installed version 9 - updated rc.conf to
point to the new location, rebooted and I'm still running 8.3.3
any help
I've been trying to upgrade named to version 9
but seem to be missing something
Currently have: FreeBSD 4.6.2 with named 8.3.3
downloaded, configured and installed version 9 - updated rc.conf to
point to the new location, rebooted and I'm still running 8.3.3
Try make
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 11:38:55AM -0500, Arnason, Arni wrote:
I've been trying to upgrade named to version 9
but seem to be missing something
Currently have: FreeBSD 4.6.2 with named 8.3.3
downloaded, configured and installed version 9 - updated rc.conf to
point
We had the same issue. The named binary on our 8.3.3 set up was in
/usr/local/bin When we installed 9 that went into /usr/sbin
I suspect that you are just calling the old binary.
--Wes
On Nov 5, 2003, at 11:35 AM, Jonathan Chen wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 11:38:55AM -0500, Arnason, Arni
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 02:50:20PM -0700, Rich Morin wrote:
I run two copies of named(8), out of /etc/rc.network:
${named_program:-named} ${named_flags} /etc/namedb/named.conf
${named_program:-named} ${named_flags} /etc/namedb/lan/named.conf
This seems to work fine, except
I run two copies of named(8), out of /etc/rc.network:
${named_program:-named} ${named_flags} /etc/namedb/named.conf
${named_program:-named} ${named_flags} /etc/namedb/lan/named.conf
This seems to work fine, except that the second instance of named
occasionally (like, once a month) disappears
Hi,
httpd is started by /usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache.sh
and named is started at boot time in /etc/rc.conf:
just enable your named there,
named_enable=YES
\jett tayer
Hello:
I'm sorry to ask this. I have searched the archive mailing list.
I've just installed 5.1 and I notice
On Monday, Oct 6, 2003, at 01:07 US/Pacific, Jett Tayer wrote:
Hello:
What I mean to say is, where does named start if not started via
named_enable=YES?
Current named be seems to be starting and named_enable=NO.
Hi,
httpd is started by /usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache.sh
and named is started
Tony wrote:
On Monday, Oct 6, 2003, at 01:07 US/Pacific, Jett Tayer wrote:
Hello:
What I mean to say is, where does named start if not started via
named_enable=YES?
Current named be seems to be starting and named_enable=NO.
Hmm, check anything in /etc/ with rc on it, do the same in
/usr
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm sorry to ask this. I have searched the archive mailing list.
I've just installed 5.1 and I notice that named and httpd is
started by gndc. I've checked /etc/rc.conf and /etc/defaults/rc.conf
and named_enable=NO.
I'm not sure waht I'm missing
Hello:
I'm sorry to ask this. I have searched the archive mailing list.
I've just installed 5.1 and I notice that named and httpd is started
by gndc. I've checked /etc/rc.conf and /etc/defaults/rc.conf and
named_enable=NO.
I'm not sure waht I'm missing. Is there some script starting
matches the UDP *:port binding of named, so I figure named
is doing this (besides it being port 53). I shut down and restarted
named on one box only to have it start the same behavior inside four
minutes again. I then shut down the VPN link and then restarted named
again (on the same box
by a VPN (mpd) which, at
just after 5 this morning and about five minutes apart, started
generating ipfw logs like this:
Sep 29 05:02:35 security.info kirk /kernel: ipfw: 200 Deny UDP
externalIP:sendport 127.0.0.2:53 out via external_iface
sendport matches the UDP *:port binding of named, so I
Greetings, list subsribers...
I've installed 5.1 and a variety of apps on a machine, in preparation
for a move to 5.1 in the near future, and in the course of playing
around on it, I've noticed a process called idle:
~games: top -SU root
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 08:04:05PM -0400, Joe Altman wrote:
Greetings, list subsribers...
I've installed 5.1 and a variety of apps on a machine, in preparation
for a move to 5.1 in the near future, and in the course of playing
around on it, I've noticed a process called idle:
...
What
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 09:39:51AM +0900, Till Plewe wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 08:04:05PM -0400, Joe Altman wrote:
Greetings, list subsribers...
I've installed 5.1 and a variety of apps on a machine, in preparation
for a move to 5.1 in the near future, and in the course of playing
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 05:50:01PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 09:39:51AM +0900, Till Plewe wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 08:04:05PM -0400, Joe Altman wrote:
Greetings, list subsribers...
I've installed 5.1 and a variety of apps on a machine, in preparation
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 10:05:38PM -0400, Joe Altman wrote:
The idle task is the kernel thread that runs when the kernel is not
doing anything else more meaningful like running user processes or
servicing I/O. It takes care of running some low-priority tasks like
pre-zeroing memory pages
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:02:32PM -0700, Tony Sterrett wrote:
Hello,
Maybe some of you know the dlint tool. Please note mail.foobar.net
nor mail appear in any of the files. Names (and ips) have been changed
to protect the guilty.
What's the question?
Your PTR records are clearly
Hello,
Maybe some of you know the dlint tool. Please note mail.foobar.net
nor mail appear in any of the files. Names (and ips) have been changed
to protect the guilty.
When I run my foobar.net zone file I get the following:
;; All responding nameservers agree on the serial number.
;; Now
Although some problem with a similar file is mentioned in
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.8R/errata.html, it doesn't
say anything about it being under /usr. The file is named
@LongLink and it is directly under /usr
(not under /usr/ports/multimedia/gstreamer-plugins/files as the
errata suggets
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 10:35:39PM -0500, Hari Bhaskaran wrote:
Although some problem with a similar file is mentioned in
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.8R/errata.html, it doesn't
say anything about it being under /usr. The file is named
@LongLink and it is directly under /usr
(not under
On Tuesday 12 August 2003 04:38 pm, Stuart Whelan wrote:
# /etc/resolv.conf
domain internal.sricrm.com
nameserver 10.1.2.2
Shouldn't nameserver be 127.0.0.1 if you have named running on the local
machine?
Yes, on the machine with named running it's set to 127.0.0.1. That's the
setting
try the search keyword as well
# /etc/resolv.conf
domain internal.sricrm.com
search internal.sricrm.com
nameserver 0.0.0.0
Travis
Stuart Whelan wrote:
# /etc/resolv.conf
domain internal.sricrm.com
nameserver 10.1.2.2
Shouldn't nameserver be 127.0.0.1 if you have named running on the local
# /etc/resolv.conf
domain internal.sricrm.com
nameserver 10.1.2.2
Shouldn't nameserver be 127.0.0.1 if you have named running on the local
machine?
Cheers,
Stuart Whelan
Technical Lead
Simulation Hardware LTD
DDI: +64 3 3778866
Mobile: +64 27 2828074
---
Outgoing mail is certified
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 07:02:02PM -0400, Tom Parquette wrote:
[...]
Messages from all.log:
Jun 29 18:02:30 Atlas named[301]: fopen() of 2.168.192.in-addr.arpa.dumptmp failed:
Permission denied
[...]
ld -l of /etc/namedb:
-rw--- 1 root wheel 610 Mar 27 18:14 2.168.192
hi there,
I use named to only forward dns requests (if any). every time I start it
(manually from the command line) it dials out. then the ppp times out after
3 mins, connection gets dropped and everything geos back to normal. as soon
as a dns request arrives ppp kicks in.. and so on and so
DJ Boris wrote:
hi there,
I use named to only forward dns requests (if any). every time I start it
(manually from the command line) it dials out. then the ppp times out after
3 mins, connection gets dropped and everything geos back to normal. as soon
as a dns request arrives ppp kicks in.. and so
yes I have dialup yes.
my named.conf is actually quite simple as I only use it for dns forwarding
therefore I don't actually need to set the heartbeat-interval. if I start
named, let it dial, wait for the ppp time out to expire and leave the system
for days without any traffic it doesn't dial. so
hi there,
I use named to only forward dns requests (if any). every time I start it
(manually from the command line) it dials out. then the ppp times out after
3 mins, connection gets dropped and everything geos back to normal. as soon
as a dns request arrives ppp kicks in.. and so on and so
On Sunday 16 March 2003 06:29, DJ Boris wrote:
hi there,
I use named to only forward dns requests (if any). every time I start it
(manually from the command line) it dials out. then the ppp times out after
3 mins, connection gets dropped and everything geos back to normal. as soon
as a dns
DJ Boris wrote:
yes I have dialup yes.
my named.conf is actually quite simple as I only use it for dns forwarding
therefore I don't actually need to set the heartbeat-interval. if I start
named, let it dial, wait for the ppp time out to expire and leave the system
for days without any traffic
I have supress-initial-notify set to yes as well... no change.
my DNS forwarders do require a dial out to reach but I don't see why this
should happen when I start up named.
Up until now I was using a Windows NT4 server and I had a programme called
WinRoutePro http://www.infoware.be/en/winroute
: Sunday, March 16, 2003 7:17 PM
Subject: Re: how can I stop named to dial out at startup
On Sunday 16 March 2003 06:29, DJ Boris wrote:
hi there,
I use named to only forward dns requests (if any). every time I start it
(manually from the command line) it dials out. then the ppp times out
On Sunday 16 March 2003 13:16, DJ Boris wrote:
I have supress-initial-notify set to yes as well... no change.
my DNS forwarders do require a dial out to reach but I don't see why this
should happen when I start up named.
Up until now I was using a Windows NT4 server and I had a programme
' IP's and my loopback. all is fine
I can ping any machine on the LAN and all LAN machines can ping me without
ppp dialing out. in resolv.conf I have nameservers 127.0.0.1
hm, I am thinking I will just switch off named and tell squid to use the
ISP's DNS. I don't really need a DNS for a 5 PC LAN even
to the *problem*
in hosts I have all my internal machines' IP's and my loopback. all is fine
I can ping any machine on the LAN and all LAN machines can ping me without
ppp dialing out. in resolv.conf I have nameservers 127.0.0.1
hm, I am thinking I will just switch off named and tell squid to use
works fine but as soon as I enable
named in the rc.conf it hangs at startup. and the other way around, when I
enable named and disable ppp machine starts fine... the only way is to use
the work around... I am totally confused...
- Original Message -
From: Lars Eighner [EMAIL PROTECTED
hi there,
I have a freeBSD 5.0 RELEASE machine acting as a Dial-Up router and proxy
for a LAN with 1 ISP Dial-Up account. I have user-ppp, named and squid.
when all are enabled in the rc.conf file the machine hangs at boot time just
before it says i386 initialisation or something like
hi there,
I have a freeBSD 5.0 RELEASE machine acting as a Dial-Up router and proxy
for a LAN with 1 ISP Dial-Up account. I have user-ppp, named and squid.
when all are enabled in the rc.conf file the machine hangs at boot time just
before it says i386 initialisation or something like
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, DJ Boris wrote:
hi there,
I have a freeBSD 5.0 RELEASE machine acting as a Dial-Up router and proxy
for a LAN with 1 ISP Dial-Up account. I have user-ppp, named and squid.
when all are enabled in the rc.conf file the machine hangs at boot time just
before it says i386
Hi!
I installed FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE (generic kernel).
When I try to direct stream to a named pipe, I get:
Resource temporarily unavailable.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# mkfifo f; find /etc f
[1] 2200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# -bash: f: Resource temporarily unavailable
???
Thanks,
Borut
Hi!
The system doesn't wait for me to open the reader, I get the message
instantly.
I worked on 4.7 still does (also on linux, netbsd, ... :-) )
This is NetBSD 1.6
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# echo test f
[1] 2383
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cat f
test
[1]+ Doneecho test f
On Monday 10 March 2003 10:22 pm, Borut Kurnik wrote:
Hi!
The system doesn't wait for me to open the reader, I get the message
instantly.
I worked on 4.7 still does (also on linux, netbsd, ... :-) )
Ok then you may want to either use 4.7, or upgrade to -current and see how it
does there.
On Monday 10 March 2003 09:22 pm, Borut Kurnik wrote:
I worked on 4.7 still does (also on linux, netbsd, ... :-) )
This is NetBSD 1.6
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# echo test f
[1] 2383
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cat f
test
[1]+ Doneecho test f
And this is FreeBSD 5.0
bash-2.05b.004 here too. But -current might help.
Borut
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 04:51, David Syphers wrote:
On Monday 10 March 2003 09:22 pm, Borut Kurnik wrote:
I worked on 4.7 still does (also on linux, netbsd, ... :-) )
This is NetBSD 1.6
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# echo test f
[1]
In my /var/log/messages I keep getting this output from named
Feb 25 08:20:18 dynedyne named[48482]: starting (/etc/namedb/named.conf)
Feb 25 08:20:18 dynedyne named[48482]: limit files set to fdlimit (1024)
Feb 25 08:20:18 dynedyne named[48482]: /etc/namedb/named.conf:5: syntax
error near zone
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 08:27:42AM -0500, Mike B wrote:
In my /var/log/messages I keep getting this output from named
Feb 25 08:20:18 dynedyne named[48482]: starting (/etc/namedb/named.conf)
Feb 25 08:20:18 dynedyne named[48482]: limit files set to fdlimit (1024)
Feb 25 08:20:18 dynedyne
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 01:45:27AM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote:
I believe the normal way to chroot named in FreeBSD is something like:
named_enable=YES
named_flags=-u bind -g bind -t /etc/namedb -c named.conf
...in /etc/rc.conf. When doing so, the following seems to make life
much better
Ceri Davies wrote:
[ ... ]
Please read the section on this in the handbook.
This one:
17.9.8 Running named in a Sandbox
Contributed by Ceri Davies.
...? :-) Thank you.
-Chuck
Hmm. Quick testing suggests that having a /usr/obj tree lying around
does trigger the problem of staticly
I've been working on setting up named in a sandbox. I got some
helpful hints here where I couldn't quite understand the handbook
(yes, I did read it, that doesn't necessarily mean I understood it :).
Anyway, I followed the handbook steps for sandboxing named exactly -
meaning I didn't even
Louis LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And, finally, once I got named started in this manner, I got the
following message in the /var/log/messages:
Jan 28 10:41:04 keyslapper named[42779]: check_hints: A records for
J.ROOT-SERVERS.NET class 1 do not match hint records
Doing a lookup
I believe the normal way to chroot named in FreeBSD is something like:
named_enable=YES
named_flags=-u bind -g bind -t /etc/namedb -c named.conf
...in /etc/rc.conf. When doing so, the following seems to make life
much better for ndc and the config file:
mkdir /etc/namedb/etc
mkdir /etc/namedb
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 12:00:34AM +, Stacey Roberts wrote:
Okay, I've managed to track this down. VPN testing is was being done at
the time from that Win2K box to a remote site running RRAS VPN Server on
Win2K Server.
Seems that RRAS dynamically assigns IP's from a static table of
noticed these named entries in /var/log/messages:
named[143]: denied update from [host_IP].1268 for
1.168.192.in-addr.arpa IN
Are you running a DHCP server? On Windows 2K?
This is a host trying to insert a dynamic PTR record into your DNS.
That is usually a function of a DHCP server
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, at 18:10 [=GMT-0600], Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jan 14), Stacey Roberts said:
named[143]: denied update from [host_IP].1268 for 1.168.192.in-addr.arpa IN
Is that host running Windows 2000 or XP? Does it also have
Register this connection's
--- Marc Schneiders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, at 18:10 [=GMT-0600], Dan
Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jan 14), Stacey Roberts said:
named[143]: denied update from
[host_IP].1268 for 1.168.192.in-addr.arpa IN
Is that host running Windows 2000 or XP
Hello,
I'm running bind in a sandbox as per the handbook. I've had this
set up and (presumably) working okay since FreeBSD 4.6 Stable, and have
today noticed these named entries in /var/log/messages:
named[143]: denied update from [host_IP].1268 for
1.168.192.in-addr.arpa IN
There's
Hi Dan,
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 23:37, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jan 14), Stacey Roberts said:
Hello,
I'm running bind in a sandbox as per the handbook. I've had this
set up and (presumably) working okay since FreeBSD 4.6 Stable, and have
today noticed these named entries
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 11:23:51PM +, Stacey Roberts wrote:
Hello,
I'm running bind in a sandbox as per the handbook. I've had this
set up and (presumably) working okay since FreeBSD 4.6 Stable, and have
today noticed these named entries in /var/log/messages:
named[143]: denied
these named entries in /var/log/messages:
named[143]: denied update from [host_IP].1268 for
1.168.192.in-addr.arpa IN
Are you running a DHCP server? On Windows 2K?
There *is* a Win2K Pro box on the network here, no DHCP Server running,
though.
This is a host trying to insert
In the last episode (Jan 14), Stacey Roberts said:
Hello,
I'm running bind in a sandbox as per the handbook. I've had this
set up and (presumably) working okay since FreeBSD 4.6 Stable, and have
today noticed these named entries in /var/log/messages:
named[143]: denied update from
Stable, and have today noticed these named entries in
/var/log/messages:
named[143]: denied update from [host_IP].1268 for 1.168.192.in-addr.arpa IN
Is that host running Windows 2000 or XP? Does it also have
Register this connection's addresses in DNS checked in (deep
Yes, its
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 01:06:45AM -0600, Jon W. Backstrom wrote:
Dear FreeBSD Community,
I am trying to run named (bind) in a sandbox using the default flags
found in the config files. I've got this in my /etc/rc.conf file:
named_enable=YES # Run named, the DNS server
Dear FreeBSD Community,
I am trying to run named (bind) in a sandbox using the default flags
found in the config files. I've got this in my /etc/rc.conf file:
named_enable=YES # Run named, the DNS server (or NO).
named_flags=-u bind -g bind # Flags for named
I also did a chown -R
Hi,
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 07:06, Jon W. Backstrom wrote:
Dear FreeBSD Community,
I am trying to run named (bind) in a sandbox using the default flags
found in the config files. I've got this in my /etc/rc.conf file:
named_enable=YES # Run named, the DNS server
named really *is* running.
This looks like a packet-filter issue and I am stumped?
Anybody??
thanks in advance for and insights,
gary
idea why the following messages are being output to /var/log/messages?
--These messages may not be a concern
since named
? --These messages may not be a concern
since named really *is* running.
This looks like a packet-filter issue and I am stumped?
Anybody??
thanks in advance for and insights,
gary
snipped
(date) sage /usr/local/sbin/named[722]: starting BIND 9.1.3 -c /etc
output to
/var/log/messages? --These messages may not be a concern
since named really *is* running.
This looks like a packet-filter issue and I am stumped?
Anybody??
thanks in advance for and insights,
gary
snipped
(date) sage
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Gary D Kline wrote:
These messages may not be a concern
since named really *is* running.
This looks like a packet-filter issue and I am stumped?
First things first. Turn of named. Then turn off IPF
messages are being output to
/var/log/messages? --These messages may not be a concern
since named really *is* running.
This looks like a packet-filter issue and I am stumped?
Anybody??
thanks in advance for and insights,
gary
snipped
On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 03:32:49PM -0600, Shane Kinney wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Gary D Kline wrote:
These messages may not be a concern
since named really *is* running.
This looks like a packet-filter issue and I am
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 01:43:04PM +0700, 'budsz' wrote:
Dec 15 13:42:00 router named[300]: omitting IPv4 interface wi0 from
localnets ACL: address mask not contiguous
What that's mean?, It's normally or some problem...? anyone can explain?
Probably an invalid address mask.
The bits
Hi,
I've 2 interface xl0 and wi0 in my box with bind9:
$ cat /var/log/message | grep named
Dec 15 13:42:00 router named[300]: omitting IPv4 interface wi0 from
localnets ACL: address mask not contiguous
What that's mean?, It's normally or some problem...? anyone can explain?
Thx
--
budsz
I have bind running to serve requests to my private network, and I'm getting
the following lines in my logs every 30 minutes:
Dec 13 15:04:22 erwin named[78]: fopen() of 192.168.100.rev.dumptmp failed:
+Permission denied
Dec 13 15:04:22 erwin named[78]: zone dump for '100.168.192.in-addr.arpa
I registered a domain name from godaddy.com. They say you must select two
name servers to list on so I chose two of their park servers. I used their
website to add myself to one of the root servers and it worked fine. I now
want to run my own name server because I want to have several subdomains
I registered a domain name from godaddy.com. They say you must select two
name servers to list on so I chose two of their park servers. I used their
website to add myself to one of the root servers and it worked fine. I now
want to run my own name server because I want to have several
From: Mike Berning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: domain names, named, and all the problems that go with it.
I registered a domain name from godaddy.com. They say you must
select two
name servers to list on so I chose two of their park servers. I
used their
website to add myself to one
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, at 11:56 [=GMT-0500], Mike Berning wrote:
I registerd my nameserver with godaddy's webform, ns1.example.com, and put
in it's ip address, then in their webform I told it to list my domain in
my nameserver and one of the root servers. Did this about two hours ago.
If I do a
On Monday, Nov 11, 2002, at 07:32 US/Pacific, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo,
S.P. wrote:
Quite possible that 'removing myself from root nameserver'
is an issue.
Your registrar (in this case godaddy.com) must have a
record of *some* two nameservers to place in the global
system. From your FreeBSD
I found a good dns hosting service at hn.org. Thanks for all the help.
Kevin Stevens said:
I recommend Secondary.com; free for a small number of domains, very
reliable. Pick another free server if you are concerned about better
redundancy. Then list THOSE nameservers as your authoratitive
On Monday, Nov 11, 2002, at 11:02 US/Pacific, Kevin Stevens wrote:
I recommend Secondary.com; free for a small number of domains, very
reliable. Pick another free server if you are concerned about better
redundancy. Then list
BTW, some observant soul pointed out that Secondary.com has gone
Hello everybody!
Help me please. What is this:
lizard named[63]: deleting interface [194.44.39.40].53
This message appears sometimes while I browse in the inet.
And after that I can use only IP addresses in my browser :(
Here is output of ifconfig:
~# ifconfig tun0
tun0: flags=8051UP
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 01:48:13AM +0200, Anton wrote:
Hello everybody!
Help me please. What is this:
lizard named[63]: deleting interface [194.44.39.40].53
This message appears sometimes while I browse in the inet.
And after that I can use only IP addresses in my browser :(
Here
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 08:34:37PM +0100, Stacey Roberts wrote:
Upon my return from work (feeling rather pleased with myself too) I
thought I'd like to see this again, but that's when I saw that I was now
unable to resolve www.vickiandstacey.com (other Internet hosts were fine
btw).
With
back to me with any ideas that you
might have.
Stacey
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 07:10, Nick Rogness wrote:
On 16 Oct 2002, Stacey Roberts wrote:
Hi Nick,
I wonder if you could take a look at my bind config files, with a
view to helping me resolve the errors I get after I restarted named
Hi Ceri,
I understand why you would suggest that I add an A record for
www.vickiandstacey.com in the zone and reverse files, but what remains
with me is wondering *why* all was well earlier this morning - that is:
I was able to resolve .vickiandstacey.com, returning the external IP
addr..,
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 05:09:37PM +0100, Stacey Roberts wrote:
Hi Nick,
I swear.., this thing was working after I had a fiddle this morning
after sending my last e-mail off to you. Now I can't run nslookup on my
domain:
# nslookup www.vickiandstacey.com
Server:
I'm attempting to restrict zone transfers on some of my domains.
I've set up the keys and allow-transfer statements. But when I do an
ndc reload, I get errors such as this in /var/log/messages:
named[89]: write_tsig_info: mkstemp(tsigs.RTdOEg) for TSIG info
failed
named[89]: unable
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-28 22:51:08 +0200:
Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-28 15:48:00 +0200:
Bye the way, RFC 1912 is definitely recommended reading for
anybody who operates a name server or who is responsible
for zone files.
hi.
Sep 28 13:22:50 ninja named[87]: master zone terrabionic.com (IN) rejected due to
errors (serial 2002092801)
now, isn't this the valid serial for today?
i've tried all kinds of dates; past, current and future. with zero, one and two
digits in the last field.
this is quite annoying
--On samedi 28 septembre 2002 13:49 +0200 Janine C.Buorditez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi.
Sep 28 13:22:50 ninja named[87]: master zone terrabionic.com (IN)
rejected due to errors (serial 2002092801)
now, isn't this the valid serial for today?
i've tried all kinds of dates; past
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-28 15:48:00 +0200:
Bye the way, RFC 1912 is definitely recommended reading for
anybody who operates a name server or who is responsible
for zone files.
Heh, RFC 1912 (and the others) are definitely recommended reading
for anybody who operates the BIND
* Roman Neuhauser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020928 08:19]:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-28 15:48:00 +0200:
Bye the way, RFC 1912 is definitely recommended reading for
anybody who operates a name server or who is responsible
for zone files.
Heh, RFC 1912 (and the others) are definitely
On Saturday, Sep 28, 2002, at 04:49 US/Pacific, Janine C.Buorditez
wrote:
hi.
Sep 28 13:22:50 ninja named[87]: master zone terrabionic.com (IN)
rejected due to errors (serial 2002092801)
now, isn't this the valid serial for today?
i've tried all kinds of dates; past, current
401 - 500 of 514 matches
Mail list logo
