On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 01:52:04AM -0500, Anonymous wrote:
We, the users of FreeBSD, *do hereby challenge* the FreeBSD project
to meet its future release dates.
I'm on the edge of my seat waiting for 9.1-RELEASE to be
Hi,
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:21:50 +0100
Matthias Gamsjager mgamsja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 01:52:04AM -0500, Anonymous wrote:
We, the users of FreeBSD, *do hereby challenge* the FreeBSD
project
On topic...
We do have these...
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.1R/schedule.html
http://wiki.freebsd.org/Releng/9.1TODO
which serve well to illustrate at least a few parts of the
problem:
- Different dates listed for the same events.
- Two different sites/pages for the same type of info.
-
From: Anonymous anonym...@foto.ro1.torservers.net
On topic...
More off remit noise (**)
Questions@ is for questions,
Not an opinion dump.
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.1R/schedule.html
http://wiki.freebsd.org/Releng/9.1TODO
(** wiki web could benefit from greater synch., But www
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 01:52:04AM -0500, Anonymous wrote:
We, the users of FreeBSD, *do hereby challenge* the FreeBSD project
to meet its future release dates.
I'm on the edge of my seat waiting for 9.1-RELEASE to be finalized. I
desperately want it as soon as possible for a laptop currently
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Stephen Cook scli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/11/2012 1:52 AM, Anonymous wrote:
We, the users of FreeBSD, *do hereby challenge* the FreeBSD project
to meet its future release dates.
Similarly, I'm a bit concerned that 9.0 loses support at the end of January,
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 01:52:04AM -0500, Anonymous wrote:
We, the users of FreeBSD, *do hereby challenge* the FreeBSD project
to meet its future release dates.
OK. Get busy. You have a lot of work to do.
Have you ever created or maintained a large project using volunteer help?
Get serious
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Anonymous
anonym...@foto.nl1.torservers.net wrote:
We, the users of FreeBSD
You speak only for yourself.
- M
PS I'll bet waiters in restaurants spit in your food
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:58:38 -0800
Michael Sierchio articulated:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Anonymous
anonym...@foto.nl1.torservers.net wrote:
We, the users of FreeBSD
You speak only for yourself.
Another interesting item referencing FreeBSD.
The FreeBSD Foundation is not the FreeBSD Project. I encourage you to
give to the Foundation, because it exists to support the Project. But
the majority of work done on the development and maintenance is not
funded by the Foundation - by and large, it is self-funded by
contributors, or
anonym...@foto.nl1.torservers.net wrote:
We, the users of FreeBSD, *do hereby challenge* the FreeBSD project
Troll Detected ?
- List remit requires a question. Poster gave no question, just criticised.
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
- There are better
We, the users of FreeBSD, *do hereby challenge* the FreeBSD project
to meet its future release dates.
Why: Because the FreeBSD project has not met a significant number
of its release dates. It's an apalling state of affairs and makes
you, the project, look silly. Business and personal users plan
On 11 December 2012 01:52, Anonymous anonym...@foto.nl1.torservers.net wrote:
We, the users of FreeBSD, *do hereby challenge* the FreeBSD project
to meet its future release dates.
No we don't. Go back to posting your pictures of kiddie porn, anonymous.
--
--
On 12/11/2012 1:52 AM, Anonymous wrote:
We, the users of FreeBSD, *do hereby challenge* the FreeBSD project
to meet its future release dates.
Similarly, I'm a bit concerned that 9.0 loses support at the end of
January, but there is no release date for 9.1 (at
On 12/11/2012 08:17 AM, Stephen Cook wrote:
On 12/11/2012 1:52 AM, Anonymous wrote:
We, the users of FreeBSD, *do hereby challenge* the FreeBSD project
to meet its future release dates.
Similarly, I'm a bit concerned that 9.0 loses support at the end of
January, but there is no release date
Dear
Madam / Mr FreeBSD.org
I am sorry in advance, i trayed to find boot only downlod
of the FreeBSD release5.2.1 in http//www.freebsd.org and
in others but i not find it yet. My CPU had two OS (F1 as
windows F2 as FreeBSD release 5.2.1 ). I have trobel
to create initial F1 as window
like to send information to me) so
i can downlod Boot only of the FreeBSD release 5.2.1 in outomaticly.
I am sorry inconvenience, Thank you for your help in advance.
Best Regard
Mutmainnah
Please , see
ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/old-releases/i386/
Thank you very
Hi there.
I tried to install 7.1-BETA from the CD I burned from 7.1-BETA-i386-disc1.iso,
but after I created all the partitions etc and then selected to install, I get
the following error message:
The disc in your drive looks more like an Audio CD than a FreeBSD release
Any idea what's wrong
It stops in docs and refuses to build.
I'm behind a router. This error has occured six times in the past twelve hours.
Any idea of what may be causing it?
_
With Windows Live for mobile, your contacts travel with you.
Desmond Chapman wrote:
It stops in docs and refuses to build.
I'm behind a router. This error has occured six times in the past twelve hours.
Any idea of what may be causing it?
No, sorry. Could be anything.
Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Fri, 18 May 2007 13:31:52 + (UTC)
Duane Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 18 May 2007, RW wrote:
On Thu, 17 May 2007 10:39:35 + (UTC)
Duane Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 17 May 2007, Matthew Seaman wrote:
You should be able to upgrade the system by a
On Thu, 17 May 2007 10:39:35 + (UTC)
Duane Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 17 May 2007, Matthew Seaman wrote:
You should be able to upgrade the system by a routine buildworld,
buildkernel ... type operation, but beware that you will need to
recompile all of your ports because
On Fri, 18 May 2007, RW wrote:
On Thu, 17 May 2007 10:39:35 + (UTC)
Duane Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 17 May 2007, Matthew Seaman wrote:
You should be able to upgrade the system by a routine buildworld,
buildkernel ... type operation, but beware that you will need to
On Fri, 18 May 2007 13:31:52 + (UTC)
Duane Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about:
portupgrade -afR
Wouldn't that force everything including ports that depend on the one
being reinstalled?
If you wanted, you could use:
portmanager -u -l -f
That will update and rebuild
On Fri, 18 May 2007, Gerard Seibert wrote:
On Fri, 18 May 2007 13:31:52 + (UTC)
Duane Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about:
portupgrade -afR
Wouldn't that force everything including ports that depend on the one
being reinstalled?
If you wanted, you could use:
Duane Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What about:
portupgrade -afR
Wouldn't that force everything including ports that depend on the one
being reinstalled?
I can't parse your question, but I think you are confusing the 'R'
option with the 'r' option. You should also note that both
On Thu, 17 May 2007, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Duane Hill wrote:
I have a server that, at first, required 5.5 because of the MTA that was
running on the server. It no longer is running that particular MTA
anymore. I need to upgrade the server to release 6.2.
Is it just a matter of changing the
I have a server that, at first, required 5.5 because of the MTA that was
running on the server. It no longer is running that particular MTA
anymore. I need to upgrade the server to release 6.2.
Is it just a matter of changing the release tag within the cvsup file from
RELENG_5_5 to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Duane Hill wrote:
I have a server that, at first, required 5.5 because of the MTA that was
running on the server. It no longer is running that particular MTA
anymore. I need to upgrade the server to release 6.2.
Is it just a matter of
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 18:53 -0800, Charles Schaum wrote:
Kudos to the GNOME FreeBSD team for continuing
improvements.
Problem: Hal no longer recognizes all vfat partitions.
Two vfat partitions at ad0s1 and ad1s2 exist. Only
ad0s1 now appears.
CD burning now proceeds better via Nautilus.
Kudos to the GNOME FreeBSD team for continuing
improvements.
Problem: Hal no longer recognizes all vfat partitions.
Two vfat partitions at ad0s1 and ad1s2 exist. Only
ad0s1 now appears.
CD burning now proceeds better via Nautilus. Before
portsnap / portmaster that failed altogether. Now CD-R
Hi There,
Is there anybody who installed asterisk on freebsd
4.11 release ?
I was not succesful. please guide me.
I updated the ports and I installed the lib using
ports but when I try to install zaptel it says cannot
load it for release before than 5
I couldn't install the asterisk from ports
Hi!
I am pretty newby to FreeBSD and I have one question. I have some Linux
(Slackware) servers and I intend to reinstall them with FreeBSD.
When I will have to upgrade something on them, I will do that with portupgrade.
But when yesterday FreeBSD 5.4 released I wondered how could I upgrade to
Simon Striker wrote:
Hi!
I am pretty newby to FreeBSD and I have one question. I have some Linux
(Slackware) servers and I intend to reinstall them with FreeBSD.
When I will have to upgrade something on them, I will do that with portupgrade.
But when yesterday FreeBSD 5.4 released I wondered how
Hey folks. I've been a FreeBSD user for a good while, and with the
5.3 release, I've been trying to figure out the details of each of the
release ISOs. The Lehey book, the online handbook, release notes, and
whatnot never mentions the purpose of each. The install instructions
simply say insert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Louis LeBlanc wrote:
| Hey folks. I've been a FreeBSD user for a good while, and with the
| 5.3 release, I've been trying to figure out the details of each of the
| release ISOs. The Lehey book, the online handbook, release notes, and
| whatnot never
On 11/07/04 03:17 PM, Jeremy Faulkner sat at the `puter and typed:
Louis LeBlanc wrote:
| Hey folks. I've been a FreeBSD user for a good while, and with the
| 5.3 release, I've been trying to figure out the details of each of the
| release ISOs. The Lehey book, the online handbook, release
Louis LeBlanc wrote:
What's the mininst disk for?
(I'm guessing it means minimum install)
The mininst iso is a bit of a misnomer. It has everything in the base
install, full docs, full src, etc the only thing it doesn't have is
X11 and all the extra 3rd party packages that are on disk1
On 2004-11-07 15:17, Jeremy Faulkner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Louis LeBlanc wrote:
| The install instructions simply say insert the installation CD. I've
| always assumed this referred to disk1. I've never needed to use disk2 in
| the install, so what's it for? What's the bootonly disk for?
In a message dated 10/11/04 7:02:55 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I hope you're not betting your business on these questions, because
the reality is that 1) they're not very good questions and 2) the
people who are answering them can't really know the answers.
stable
In a message dated 10/9/04 6:25:49 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. By Sep 2005, do you think 5.x performance will be optimized and be
comparable to today's 4.x stable versions ?
5.3 is supposed to be stable, and it's expected to be on part with 4.x
performance, and it's
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 8:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Release Question
In a message dated 10/9/04 6:25:49 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. By Sep 2005, do you think 5.x performance
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 10:20:40 EDT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/9/04 6:25:49 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. By Sep 2005, do you think 5.x performance will be optimized
and be comparable to today's 4.x stable versions ?
5.3 is supposed to be
Hi,
We are starting development on a new project that would go
production in the fall of 2005. I have been evaluating Release 4.x and
5.x branches for the suitability. Our target platform is AMD64 and AMD32
uni-processor systems. We like most of 5.x features except for its
performance and
Balakumar Velmurugan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We are starting development on a new project that would go
production in the fall of 2005. I have been evaluating Release 4.x and
5.x branches for the suitability. Our target platform is AMD64 and AMD32
uni-processor systems. We like
On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 15:07:00 -0700
Balakumar Velmurugan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We are starting development on a new project that would go
production in the fall of 2005. I have been evaluating Release 4.x
and 5.x branches for the suitability. Our target platform is AMD64
and
Vulpes Velox wrote:
On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 15:07:00 -0700
Balakumar Velmurugan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We are starting development on a new project that would go
production in the fall of 2005. I have been evaluating Release 4.x
and 5.x branches for the suitability. Our target platform
I upgraded my ports tree with cvsup using . for the release so I
would get the latest ports. pkg_add -r downloads packages from
freebsd-release-4.9 and portupgrade -aPPR fails because it tries to
download packages with version numbers matching the ports tree from the
freebsd-release-4.9
On Tuesday 04 May 2004 11:26 am, Clay Holladay wrote:
I upgraded my ports tree with cvsup using . for the release so I
would get the latest ports. pkg_add -r downloads packages from
freebsd-release-4.9 and portupgrade -aPPR fails because it tries to
download packages with version numbers
PROTECTED]
Subject: freebsd-stable packages on freebsd-release-4.9
I upgraded my ports tree with cvsup using . for the release so I
would get the latest ports. pkg_add -r downloads packages from
freebsd-release-4.9 and portupgrade -aPPR fails because it tries to
download packages with version numbers
.
,
FreeBSD ? .
Hello. Prompt please where it is possible to find the information about preparing to
release of releases FreeBSD? Thanks.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
http://www.freebsd.org/releng/index.html
Pavel A. Korshunov wrote:
.
, FreeBSD ?
.
Hello. Prompt please where it is possible to find the information about preparing to release of releases FreeBSD? Thanks.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Pavel A. Korshunov wrote:
Hello. Prompt please where it is possible to find the information about
preparing to release of releases FreeBSD? Thanks.
Start with man release and the following URLs:
http://www.freebsd.org/releng/
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/releng/index.html
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 07:16:36AM +, Supote Leelasupphakorn wrote:
Hi all
I've cvsup with below supfile. After finished,
The file:/usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh say
# @(#)newvers.sh 8.1 (Berkeley) 4/20/94
# $FreeBSD: src/sys/conf/newvers.sh,v 1.44.2.29.2.15 2003/11/27
16:34:21
Hi, Kris
My objective is I want to get FreeBSD security branch
( 4.8-RELEASE-p15 ) and as the Security Advisory in
www.freebsd.org
(ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-04:02.shmat.asc)
stated that source tree after 2004-02-04 18:01:18 is corrected
so I specified above
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 09:39:04AM +, Supote Leelasupphakorn wrote:
Hi, Kris
My objective is I want to get FreeBSD security branch
( 4.8-RELEASE-p15 ) and as the Security Advisory in
www.freebsd.org
(ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-04:02.shmat.asc)
You're specifying a date string right down to the precise
second that
the patches were applied to the tree, which I think is
confusing
cvsup, and getting you the state of things just before the
update.
All you need to do is specify a date *after* the patches went
into the
tree, but before
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:22:51AM +, Supote Leelasupphakorn wrote:
You're specifying a date string right down to the precise
second that
the patches were applied to the tree, which I think is
confusing
cvsup, and getting you the state of things just before the
update.
All you
Hi all
I've cvsup with below supfile. After finished,
The file:/usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh say
# @(#)newvers.sh 8.1 (Berkeley) 4/20/94
# $FreeBSD: src/sys/conf/newvers.sh,v 1.44.2.29.2.15 2003/11/27
16:34:21 nectar Exp $
TYPE=FreeBSD
REVISION=4.8
BRANCH=RELEASE-p14
Hi,
I have an old computer (AMD DX2486 @80MHz and 16MB RAM) and I want to install FreeBSD
on an empty 53 MB partition. I couldn't find an old release small enough to fit. Can
you help? The smallest all purpose release I could find is release 2.2.8 but it's
still not small enough.
Thank you,
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:26:49AM -0700, Dorin-Constantin Scutarasu wrote:
Hi,
I have an old computer (AMD DX2486 @80MHz and 16MB RAM) and I want to install
FreeBSD on an empty 53 MB partition. I couldn't find an old release small enough to
fit. Can you help? The smallest all purpose
Hi,
My name is Dorin Scutarasu. I have an old computer (AMD 80486 DX2 @ 80MHz with
16 MB of RAM) an I want to install FreeBSD on it in a 50 MB partition.
Can you help me find a small release that includes all the basic UNIX command line
utilities and a compiler maybe? The bin distribution
hi
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 03:46:40AM -0700, Dorin-Constantin Scutarasu wrote:
Hi,
My name is Dorin Scutarasu. I have an old computer (AMD 80486 DX2 @ 80MHz with
16 MB of RAM) an I want to install FreeBSD on it in a 50 MB partition.
Can you help me find a small release that includes all
but I really want to install an Unix based OS on it (preferably
FreeBSD).
I have been searching for an old FreeBSD release on the web that is small
enough to fit on my computer but I couldn't find one. Could you please help
me find some old releases I could try ?
The smallest I could find is release
at 80Mhz) with very little disk
space available(about 50MB). It is running
Windows 95 but I really want to install an Unix based OS on it (preferably
FreeBSD).
I have been searching for an old FreeBSD release on the web that is small
enough to fit on my computer but I couldn't find one. Could
In eager anticipation I rammed this into my freshly installed and RELENG_5_0
box. Imagine the disappointment... I tried booting with the card in and
out and tooling around with pccard.conf but.. no joy
cbb1: card inserted: event=0x, state=3820
cbb1: cbb_power: CARD_VCC_0V
Not to worry I thought, I'll get out my trusty Xircom CEM56-100 and
whack that in to the aforementioned FreeBSD 5.0 freshly installed and cvsupped
and that'll see me right. Bugger
Panic, press a button on the console or instant reboot in 15 secs..
So all in all, it looks like
.
there were 3 files. Disk1, Disk2 and a checksum file. which disk should
this file be burnt onto if at all??
Hope to hear from you soon,
Chris Lum
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
end of FreeBSD release
68 matches
Mail list logo
