Re: Freebsd support in Adelaide wanted

2013-09-22 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi Greg  questions@ etc

 That's massively out of date.  Mike left Adelaide in 1998, and has
 been working for Apple in Cupertino for about 10 years.

OK deleted.

  Greg Lehey in Echunga +61 8 83888286
 
 That's out of date too.  I left Adelaide over 6 years ago.  Up-to-date
 information at http://www.lemis.com/grog/ .

OK Updated.

  Both are well know in FreeBSD community :-)
  I've cc'd them both
 
 Thanks.  Danny did in fact contact me directly, and I think we've
 found somebody for him.

Good :-)

  PS for other consultants:
  If you want to be added to geographic indexed table
  just email me a pre-prepared HTML table enty
  See: http://www.berklix.com/consultants/
 
 It would certainly be a good idea for more eyes to go through this
 list and help you get it up to date.

Updates welcome, preferably in format  diff -c

Cheers,
Julian
-- 
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com
 Reply below not above, like a play script.  Indent old text with  .
 Send plain text.  No quoted-printable, HTML, base64, multipart/alternative.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Freebsd support in Adelaide wanted

2013-09-21 Thread Danny Beger
I have a small law firm in Adelaide and I am looking to engage someone to build 
/ purchase a new server to replace my current server which runs v6 freebsd.

Can you recommend anyone?

Regards

_ _
Danny Beger  |  Beger  Co Lawyers
p: 8362 6400  |  f: 8362 3555
www.beger.com.au


Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Freebsd support in Adelaide wanted

2013-09-21 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi, Reference:
 From: Danny Beger da...@beger.com.au 
 Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 16:30:57 +0930 

Danny Beger wrote:
 I have a small law firm in Adelaide and I am looking to engage someone to 
 build / purchase a new server to replace my current server which runs v6 
 freebsd.
 
 Can you recommend anyone?

Happily,
http://www.berklix.com/consultants/table.html
shows 
Mike Smith in Adelaide +61 8 8267 3493
Greg Lehey in Echunga +61 8 83888286
Both are well know in FreeBSD community :-)
I've cc'd them both

PS for other consultants: 
If you want to be added to geographic indexed table
just email me a pre-prepared HTML table enty
See: http://www.berklix.com/consultants/

 
 Regards
 
 _ _
 Danny Beger  |  Beger  Co Lawyers
 p: 8362 6400  |  f: 8362 3555
 www.beger.com.au
 
 
 Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards 
 Legislation 
 
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
 


Cheers,
Julian
-- 
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com
 Reply below not above, like a play script.  Indent old text with  .
 Send plain text.  No quoted-printable, HTML, base64, multipart/alternative.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Freebsd support in Adelaide wanted

2013-09-21 Thread Al Plant

Danny Beger wrote:

I have a small law firm in Adelaide and I am looking to engage someone to build 
/ purchase a new server to replace my current server which runs v6 freebsd.

Can you recommend anyone?

Regards

_ _
Danny Beger  |  Beger  Co Lawyers
p: 8362 6400  |  f: 8362 3555
www.beger.com.au


Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation 


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org





Aloha,

I believe Greg Lehey is in Australia.

g...@freebsd.org

I have seen several others on the list at different times too.

AL


~Al Plant - Honolulu, Hawaii -  Phone:  808-284-2740
  + http://hawaiidakine.com + http://freebsdinfo.org +
  + http://aloha50.net   - Supporting - FreeBSD  7.2 - 8.0 - 9* +
   email: n...@hdk5.net 
All that's really worth doing is what we do for others.- Lewis Carrol

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Freebsd support in Adelaide wanted

2013-09-21 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
I considered dropping FreeBSD-questions from this reply, but since it
contains out-of-date contact details, I'm leaving them in.

On Saturday, 21 September 2013 at 17:17:07 +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
 Hi, Reference:
 From:Danny Beger da...@beger.com.au
 Date:Sat, 21 Sep 2013 16:30:57 +0930

 Danny Beger wrote:

 I have a small law firm in Adelaide and I am looking to engage
 someone to build / purchase a new server to replace my current
 server which runs v6 freebsd.

 Can you recommend anyone?

 Happily,
 http://www.berklix.com/consultants/table.html
 shows
 Mike Smith in Adelaide +61 8 8267 3493

That's massively out of date.  Mike left Adelaide in 1998, and has
been working for Apple in Cupertino for about 10 years.

 Greg Lehey in Echunga +61 8 83888286

That's out of date too.  I left Adelaide over 6 years ago.  Up-to-date
information at http://www.lemis.com/grog/ .

 Both are well know in FreeBSD community :-)
 I've cc'd them both

Thanks.  Danny did in fact contact me directly, and I think we've
found somebody for him.

 PS for other consultants:
 If you want to be added to geographic indexed table
 just email me a pre-prepared HTML table enty
 See: http://www.berklix.com/consultants/

It would certainly be a good idea for more eyes to go through this
list and help you get it up to date.

Greg
--
Sent from my desktop computer.
Finger g...@freebsd.org for PGP public key.
See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
This message is digitally signed.  If your Microsoft MUA reports
problems, please read http://tinyurl.com/broken-mua


pgpq8FhBNt4Hc.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Announcement] TeX Live 2011: Extended FreeBSD support

2011-07-22 Thread Nikola Lečić
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

Dear FreeBSD community,

Yesterday, Karl Berry announced the release of TeX Live 2011:

  http://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2011-July/029711.html

For those of you who use the official distribution, we arranged
everything so that TeX Live 2011 should work on FreeBSD 7, 8 and 9
(i386 and amd64) out of the box.

However, there are some special cases; like the previous year I
prepared the Extended FreeBSD support page:

  http://anthesphoria.net/FreeBSD/TeXLive-2011/bin/

These special cases include FreeBSD 8 and 9 users who need applications
such as asy and xindy, and users of older FreeBSD releases (5 and 6).
Please refer to README.txt for the detailed info.

A special note for users of biblatex: FreeBSD binaries of the
next-generation biblatex backend, biber, are included in TeX Live 2011.
An additional support for biblatex-biber users on older FreeBSD releases
is available as well:

  http://anthesphoria.net/FreeBSD/Biber/

Since biber is a Perl script that relies on many newer-than-ported and
not-yet-ported Perl modules, this is currently the only easy way to run
biber on FreeBSD.

- -- 
Nikola Lečić = Никола Лечић
fingerprint : FEF3 66AF C90E EDC3 D878  7CDC 956D F4AB A377 1C9B

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD)

iJwEAQEDAAYFAk4pwnsACgkQ/MM/0rYIoZiTFgP+Oq6Eonjesoi26pBjmLu4Lg3a
E8HSUcOsVtmnBTIb/UBCAujC3P6vUGaaUQM28UCZ1cmZbl/1k54V3wiGCr4YdFc7
r9kdFPWmCgOWLX0PWcPhuOilmdhz3/h9D0fQYct4r80y2kjg/7TpOd+Tdqnd48z+
rxeY/A8QK1wjD31I3Co=
=Myto
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Does FreeBSD support SB16C1058PCI RS-232 cards?

2011-03-25 Thread dieterbsd
I'm looking at the SYBA SD-PCI15029 8 port RS-232 PCI card
http://www.sybausa.com/productInfo.php?iid=994
$32.99 from newegg:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16815124099

Chipset: SB16C1058PCI
Compatible with 16C550

But... grep doesn't find any reference to the SB16C1058PCI
much less SD-PCI15029.  I fear that 16C550 isn't enough?


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD Support for Fibre Channel Devices

2010-07-13 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 03:06:03PM -0700, Tim Gustafson wrote:
  isp(4)
  mpt(4)
 
 Hrmm, I guess I should phrase the question this way:
 
 I have installed a Fibre Channel card into a new FreeBSD 8.x box.  I have 
 both isp(4) and mpt(4) are loaded and the device still doesn't appear in 
 /dev.  pciconf shows:
 
 no...@pci0:8:1:0: class=0x0c0400 card=0x656c1242 chip=0x15601242 rev=0xb2 
 hdr=0x00
  vendor   = 'Jaycor Networks Inc'
  device   = 'Dual Channel 2 Gb/s Fibre Channel-PCI-X (JNIC-1560)'
  class= serial bus
  subclass = Fibre Channel
 
 So I'm guessing that this device is unsupported.  So, what I was trying to 
 ascertain from my original question is: does anyone have any FreeBSD 
 experience with a Fibre Channel card that they like under FreeBSD that I can 
 replace this one with?
 
 Basically I'm asking for a recommendation along the lines of I have card X 
 and it works beautifully.  :)

I have X card and it workd beautifully.

On ia64 -current I have:

i...@pci0:192:1:0:  class=0x0c0400 card=0x12d6103c chip=0x24221077 rev=0x02 
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'QLogic Corporation'
device = 'QLogic PCI to Fibre Channel Host Adapter for QLA2460 
(ISP2422)'
class  = serial bus
subclass   = Fibre Channel

which gives:

da1 at isp0 bus 0 scbus2 target 0 lun 1
da1: COMPAQ MSA1000 VOLUME 4.32 Fixed Direct Access SCSI-4 device 
da1: 200.000MB/s transfers WWNN 0x500805f3000ec220 WWPN 0x500805f3000ec221 
PortID 0x1
da1: Command Queueing enabled
da1: 69460MB (142255575 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 8855C)
da2 at isp0 bus 0 scbus2 target 0 lun 2
da2: COMPAQ MSA1000 VOLUME 4.32 Fixed Direct Access SCSI-4 device 
da2: 200.000MB/s transfers WWNN 0x500805f3000ec220 WWPN 0x500805f3000ec221 
PortID 0x1
da2: Command Queueing enabled
da2: 69460MB (142255575 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 8855C)

As you can see my disk array is Compaq MSA1000.


-- 
Anton Shterenlikht
Room 2.6, Queen's Building
Mech Eng Dept
Bristol University
University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944
Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


FreeBSD Support for Fibre Channel Devices

2010-07-12 Thread Tim Gustafson
Hi,

Can anyone recommend a FreeBSD-compatible fibre channel board to connect a 
FreeBSD 8.0 server to a Sun 3500 disk array?

Tim Gustafson
Baskin School of Engineering
UC Santa Cruz
t...@soe.ucsc.edu
831-459-5354

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD Support for Fibre Channel Devices

2010-07-12 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 12/07/2010 22:49:51, Tim Gustafson wrote:

 Can anyone recommend a FreeBSD-compatible fibre channel board to
 connect a FreeBSD 8.0 server to a Sun 3500 disk array?

isp(4)
mpt(4)

... which is basically what shows up on doing 'man -k fibre'

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
  Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk   Kent, CT11 9PW



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: FreeBSD Support for Fibre Channel Devices

2010-07-12 Thread Tim Gustafson
 isp(4)
 mpt(4)

Hrmm, I guess I should phrase the question this way:

I have installed a Fibre Channel card into a new FreeBSD 8.x box.  I have both 
isp(4) and mpt(4) are loaded and the device still doesn't appear in /dev.  
pciconf shows:

no...@pci0:8:1:0: class=0x0c0400 card=0x656c1242 chip=0x15601242 rev=0xb2 
hdr=0x00
 vendor   = 'Jaycor Networks Inc'
 device   = 'Dual Channel 2 Gb/s Fibre Channel-PCI-X (JNIC-1560)'
 class= serial bus
 subclass = Fibre Channel

So I'm guessing that this device is unsupported.  So, what I was trying to 
ascertain from my original question is: does anyone have any FreeBSD experience 
with a Fibre Channel card that they like under FreeBSD that I can replace this 
one with?

Basically I'm asking for a recommendation along the lines of I have card X and 
it works beautifully.  :)

Tim Gustafson
Baskin School of Engineering
UC Santa Cruz
t...@soe.ucsc.edu
831-459-5354
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


FreeBSD Support Cycle

2010-03-08 Thread mailinglist
I'm possibly considering building a FreeBSD based NAS to provide NFS storage 
for vSphere in a production environment.  I would use FreeBSD-8, amd64 variety. 
 What is the expected EOS  EOL dates (end of support/end of life) for FreeBSD 
8?  I'm not sure if the EOL question matters for an open source OS, but 
basically I'm just asking at what point in time would there no longer be 
security updates and bug fixes made to the 
OS?___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD Support Cycle

2010-03-08 Thread Michael Powell
mailinglist wrote:

 I'm possibly considering building a FreeBSD based NAS to provide NFS
 storage for vSphere in a production environment.  I would use FreeBSD-8,
 amd64 variety.  What is the expected EOS  EOL dates (end of support/end
 of life) for FreeBSD 8?  I'm not sure if the EOL question matters for an
 open source OS, but basically I'm just asking at what point in time would
 there no longer be security updates and bug fixes made to the
 OS?

http://security.freebsd.org/#sup

Of course, possibly subject to change or update. Usually any new additions 
of changes are reported in various @announce mailing lists. The security 
announce list will report on specifically the secure patch support question.

-Mike




___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD Support Cycle

2010-03-08 Thread Ricardo Jesus

On 08/03/2010 15:39, mailinglist wrote:

I'm possibly considering building a FreeBSD based NAS to provide NFS storage for 
vSphere in a production environment.  I would use FreeBSD-8, amd64 variety.  What 
is the expected EOS  EOL dates (end of support/end of life) for FreeBSD 8?  
I'm not sure if the EOL question matters for an open source OS, but basically I'm 
just asking at what point in time would there no longer be security updates and bug 
fixes made to the OS?___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Have a look at http://security.freebsd.org/#sup.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Does FreeBSD support the Ralink RT73 chipset

2009-11-10 Thread carmel_ny
I just got my hands on a Belkin Wireless device that uses a Ralink
RT73 chipset. Rather than waste a lot of time attempting to get it to
work, I thought I would ask if anyone here has succeed in doing so. I
see that FreeBSD supports: Atheros and Intersil Prism
components;however, I did not see any mention of the Ralink RT73
chipset.

-- 
Carmel
carmel...@hotmail.com

|===
|===
|===
|===
|

Like the ski resort of girls looking for husbands and husbands looking
for girls, the situation is not as symmetrical as it might seem.

Alan McKay

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Does FreeBSD support the Ralink RT73 chipset

2009-11-10 Thread Jeronimo Calvo
Hi there,

I am using RT61, so makes me wonder that RT73 does.

Cheers!

2009/11/10 carmel_ny carmel...@hotmail.com:
 I just got my hands on a Belkin Wireless device that uses a Ralink
 RT73 chipset. Rather than waste a lot of time attempting to get it to
 work, I thought I would ask if anyone here has succeed in doing so. I
 see that FreeBSD supports: Atheros and Intersil Prism
 components;however, I did not see any mention of the Ralink RT73
 chipset.

 --
 Carmel
 carmel...@hotmail.com

 |===
 |===
 |===
 |===
 |

 Like the ski resort of girls looking for husbands and husbands looking
 for girls, the situation is not as symmetrical as it might seem.

        Alan McKay

 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org




-- 
() ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org  | Against proprietary extensions
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Does FreeBSD support the Ralink RT73 chipset

2009-11-10 Thread carmel_ny
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:17:12 +
Jeronimo Calvo jeronimocal...@googlemail.com replied:

I am using RT61, so makes me wonder that RT73 does.

I contacted Belkin to make sure I had the proper information. They
responded:

Chipset information for F5D9050 version 4000 is Ralink RT2671F, RT2528L
(RT73)

-- 

Carmel
carmel...@hotmail.com

|===
|===
|===
|===
|

Increased knowledge will help you now.
Have mate's phone bugged.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD support for 64-bit x86 systems

2009-07-04 Thread Chris Rees
2009/7/2 Sam Fourman Jr. sfour...@gmail.com:
 On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Daniel Underwooddjuatde...@gmail.com wrote:
 Does FreeBSD currently support 64-bit x86 systems?

 amd64 supports both amd and intel 64bit CPU's

 right now the big limitation for me is you can not
 have a Nvidia binary graphics driver on amd64

 progress has been made on this front in the last month.


Really? Can I have a link please?? I really want to migrate...

Chris


-- 
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in a mailing list?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


FreeBSD support for 64-bit x86 systems

2009-07-01 Thread Daniel Underwood
Does FreeBSD currently support 64-bit x86 systems?

I've been here, but my knowledge of hardware terminology is too
limited to confidently draw conclusions:
http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD support for 64-bit x86 systems

2009-07-01 Thread Glen Barber
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Daniel Underwooddjuatde...@gmail.com wrote:
 Does FreeBSD currently support 64-bit x86 systems?

 I've been here, but my knowledge of hardware terminology is too
 limited to confidently draw conclusions:
 http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/

amd64


-- 
Glen Barber
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD support for 64-bit x86 systems

2009-07-01 Thread Daniel Underwood
 amd64

Ah-hah. Thanks!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD support for 64-bit x86 systems

2009-07-01 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Daniel Underwooddjuatde...@gmail.com wrote:
 Does FreeBSD currently support 64-bit x86 systems?

amd64 supports both amd and intel 64bit CPU's

right now the big limitation for me is you can not
have a Nvidia binary graphics driver on amd64

progress has been made on this front in the last month.


Sam Fourman Jr
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


FreeBSD support for HP DL180/G5

2008-10-09 Thread Josef Grosch

Does anyone have experience running FreeBSD 6.x and 7.x on an HP DL180/G5?
The company I work for is looking to get a number of these to be put in
production. Your general impressions would be a good start.



Josef

-- 
Josef Grosch   | Another day closer to a | FreeBSD 6.3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   Micro$oft free world  | Berkeley, Ca.


pgpL1GSOeKtMy.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: FreeBSD support for HP DL180/G5

2008-10-09 Thread David Alanis

Quoting Josef Grosch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:



Does anyone have experience running FreeBSD 6.x and 7.x on an HP DL180/G5?
The company I work for is looking to get a number of these to be put in
production. Your general impressions would be a good start.



Josef

--
Josef Grosch   | Another day closer to a | FreeBSD 6.3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   Micro$oft free world  | Berkeley, Ca.



Josef,

I run freebsd 7.0 on a DL 380 G3 - A Pentium 4, 6G RAM, x86 with out  
issue. Old machines but they run fine.


David


This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD support for HP DL180/G5

2008-10-09 Thread Subhro
HP produces pretty good boxes and historically I have been able to get them
working without any troubles. However I would say DL180 is a pretty non
customizable box. The hardware works perfectly with FreeBSD 7.0. I didnt try
it with 6.3, so cant comment on that.

However I would say DL380 is a better off. The main advantage of DL3xx boxes
are there is a lot of room to play with add-on cards. Also not all the
latest and greatest processors are available with DL1xx family of servers.

Also make sure that you go for an external RAID controller like 3ware or
Areca. I prefer Areca more :-D. The HP RAID controller cant take the beating
I give to it.

Thanks
Subhro

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 1:55 AM, Josef Grosch [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:


 Does anyone have experience running FreeBSD 6.x and 7.x on an HP DL180/G5?
 The company I work for is looking to get a number of these to be put in
 production. Your general impressions would be a good start.



 Josef

 --
 Josef Grosch   | Another day closer to a | FreeBSD 6.3
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] |   Micro$oft free world  | Berkeley, Ca.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Does FreeBSD support rfc4443-ICMPv6?

2008-03-16 Thread Rommel Laranjo
Hello,

Can anyone shed light if FreeBSD already support ICMPv6 based on RFC 4443?

Thanks,

Rommel
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: FreeBSD support this hardware?

2008-02-29 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ivan Voras
 Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 3:30 AM
 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
 Subject: Re: FreeBSD support this hardware?
 
 
 Robe wrote:
 
  And here's the link to the CPU page 
 http://www.dmp.com.tw/tech/Vortex86SX/
  
  Can anybody tell me if FreeBSD support this hardware?
 
 Judging by the SX label and the information on the page, no, because
 it doesn't have a FPU.
 

I'm surprised they claim Linux compatability since
I thought Linux required an FPU as well.

FreeBSD 4.X supports these with the kernel option
MATH_EMULATE or GPL_MATH_EMULATE  Later versions of
FreeBSD got rid of that option.

NetBSD 4 still has MATH_EMULATE but it's buggy.  There
was a discussion last month on the NetBSD mailing
list about whether it would be a good thing to fix it.

You could, possibly, recompile FreeBSD (or more
likely, picobsd, see man picobsd for information)
with the -msoft-float option to gcc to build a version
that would not require a FPU.   But you still need
an emulator that would supply the floating point
operations. gcc includes (or included) a generic
implementation of these functions in dp-bit.c and
fp-bit.c.  Of course, it would be under the GPL.
Or you could get the FreeBSD 4.11 source and dig up
the ancient emulator that was under the BSD license
and use that.

Here's a thread fragment I found that discusses the
process with regards to building libgcc 
http://www.busybox.net/lists/uclibc/2002-May/003404.html

Good luck - some things are better off left dead,
the non-FPU cpus were one of these things.

Ted

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD support this hardware?

2008-02-28 Thread Ivan Voras
Robe wrote:

 And here's the link to the CPU page http://www.dmp.com.tw/tech/Vortex86SX/
 
 Can anybody tell me if FreeBSD support this hardware?

Judging by the SX label and the information on the page, no, because
it doesn't have a FPU.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


FreeBSD support this hardware?

2008-02-27 Thread Robe
Hi there,

I need to create a program using this hardware from iCOP technology
VSX-6115

It has 128MB of RAM.

I know there's available at least one Linux kernel configuration for this
hardware, but I want to do it using FreeBSD.

Here's the link to the Board page
http://www.icop.com.tw/products_detail.asp?ProductID=276

And here's the link to the CPU page http://www.dmp.com.tw/tech/Vortex86SX/

Can anybody tell me if FreeBSD support this hardware?

Thanks,


-- 
Robe.

El optimista siempre tiene un proyecto. El pesimista siempre tiene una
excusa.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: does freebsd support Vostro 1400 notebook?

2007-12-11 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 03:19:56AM +, lveax wrote:

 hey all,
 
 i want to buy a dell vostro 1400
 http://www.dell.com/content/products/productdetails.aspx/vostronb_1400?c=uscs=04l=ens=bsd~tab=bundlestab

 
 does freebsd support it?

That is pretty new.  I wonder if anyone has had a chance to get one
and try it.   You can get one and test it out.

jerry


 
 which driver should i use?
 
 sound card/network card/etc
 
 i will update the
 Video Cards
 128MB NVIDIA(R) GeForce? 8400M GS
 
 i found the nvidia-driver support it
 http://us.download.nvidia.com/freebsd/100.14.19/README/appendix-e.html
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


does freebsd support Vostro 1400 notebook?

2007-12-10 Thread lveax
hey all,

i want to buy a dell vostro 1400
http://www.dell.com/content/products/productdetails.aspx/vostronb_1400?c=uscs=04l=ens=bsd~tab=bundlestab

does freebsd support it?

which driver should i use?

sound card/network card/etc

i will update the
Video Cards
128MB NVIDIA(R) GeForce™ 8400M GS

i found the nvidia-driver support it
http://us.download.nvidia.com/freebsd/100.14.19/README/appendix-e.html
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


FreeBSD support for Jetway J7F4

2007-10-17 Thread Erik Norgaard

Hi:

I have searched around to verify that everything works fine for this 
motherboard with integrated CPU: Jetway J7F4. I understand it has a 
CN700 north bridge and a VT8237R or VT8237RP south bridge, and Realtek 
RLT8110SC dual LAN.


I have found reports that FreeBSD hangs when doing ifconfig re1 up, has 
this been solved? Does it work if only one NIC is used?


I understand from wikipedia that autonegotiate of SATA speed with 
VT8237R fails, but what about VT8237RP? Not a huge problem though, I 
plan to get a disk that accepts speed setting by a jumper.


Does RAID work with this south bridge?

Thanks, Erik

--
Erik Nørgaard
Ph: +34.666334818   http://www.locolomo.org
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD support for Jetway J7F4

2007-10-17 Thread Roland Smith
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 08:14:29PM +0200, Erik Norgaard wrote:
 Hi:
 
 I have searched around to verify that everything works fine for this 
 motherboard with integrated CPU: Jetway J7F4. I understand it has a CN700 
 north bridge and a VT8237R or VT8237RP south bridge, and Realtek RLT8110SC 
 dual LAN.
 
 I have found reports that FreeBSD hangs when doing ifconfig re1 up, has 
 this been solved? Does it work if only one NIC is used?

No experience with the RLT8110S, but the two Realtek RT8139 in my
machine work OK.

 I understand from wikipedia that autonegotiate of SATA speed with VT8237R 
 fails, but what about VT8237RP? Not a huge problem though, I plan to get a 
 disk that accepts speed setting by a jumper.
 
 Does RAID work with this south bridge?

I've got RAID1 working with this chip:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:15:0:  class=0x010400 card=0x80ed1043 chip=0x31491106 
rev=0x80 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'VIA Technologies Inc'
device = 'VT8237  VT6410 SATA RAID Controller'
class  = mass storage
subclass   = RAID

HTH,
Roland
-- 
R.F.Smith   http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/
[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914  B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)


pgp0p6AVLz9fe.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Does FreeBSD support UTF-8 locale well?

2007-09-20 Thread ronggui
I use zh_CN.GBK as a tentative solution, It works but not as perfectly
as I expected. If I use zh_CN.UTF-8, almost all of the Chinese
characters in the fat32 partition can't be displayed correctly when
mounted.

BTW, is there any plan the improve UTF-8 support in BSD community?


2007/9/19, Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 ronggui wrote:

  In terms of UTF-8 support, Linux seems better than FreeBSD. How do you
  guys think?

 Yes. FreeBSD's UTF-8 support is really bad, and it's practically
 nonexistant when you look at things like collation.





-- 
Ronggui Huang

Department of Sociology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

Department of Public and Social Administration, CityU, HK
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Does FreeBSD support UTF-8 locale well?

2007-09-19 Thread Ivan Voras

ronggui wrote:


In terms of UTF-8 support, Linux seems better than FreeBSD. How do you
guys think?


Yes. FreeBSD's UTF-8 support is really bad, and it's practically 
nonexistant when you look at things like collation.




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Does FreeBSD support UTF-8 locale well?

2007-09-18 Thread ronggui
I try to use zh_CN.UTF-8 as locales, but the FAT3 data can not display
correctly. When I use zh_CN.EUC as locale, things get better, but not
all the Chinese characters display correctly.

In terms of UTF-8 support, Linux seems better than FreeBSD. How do you
guys think?

Thanks.

-- 
Ronggui Huang

Department of Sociology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

Department of Public and Social Administration, CityU, HK
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Does FreeBSD support UTF-8 locale well?

2007-09-18 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 12:41:45AM +0800, ronggui wrote:
 I try to use zh_CN.UTF-8 as locales, but the FAT3 data can not display
 correctly. When I use zh_CN.EUC as locale, things get better, but not
 all the Chinese characters display correctly.
 
 In terms of UTF-8 support, Linux seems better than FreeBSD. How do you
 guys think?

I don't have any FAT3 data, but I've been using UTF-8 locales on
most of my desktop and server systems for years now and never
experienced any serious problems. You have to expect a few
surprieses - when dealing with ISO-8859-encoded data, for
example, but overall my experience has been quite smooth.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Does FreeBSD support the 3600 MCP Chipset?

2007-04-24 Thread Sean Murphy

Does FreeBSD support the 3600 MCP Chipset?

I was thinking about purchasing a Sun server that used the AMD CPU and 
the NVIDIA nForce Professional 3600 MCP.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Howmany CPU Does FreeBSD Support ?

2007-03-12 Thread Wojciech Puchar

for machines doing mostly fileserving and routing even 2 CPUs may
be not well utilized


That is only true if the process is giant locked. When look at dmesg,
look for things that say GIANT-LOCKED and those will be ones confined
to one processor. There has been a massive push since 5 to get ride
of those.


top shows giant-lock RARELY when i observe my machines.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Howmany CPU Does FreeBSD Support ?

2007-03-12 Thread Ivan Voras
Vulpes Velox wrote:

 That is only true if the process is giant locked. When look at dmesg,
 look for things that say GIANT-LOCKED and those will be ones confined
 to one processor. 

Which happens to include all SCSI devices I've encountered...
sigh.

And it's NOT rare to see giant locked processes on a heavily loaded web
server.





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Howmany CPU Does FreeBSD Support ?

2007-03-12 Thread Nikolas Britton

On 3/12/07, Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Vulpes Velox wrote:

 That is only true if the process is giant locked. When look at dmesg,
 look for things that say GIANT-LOCKED and those will be ones confined
 to one processor.

Which happens to include all SCSI devices I've encountered...
sigh.

And it's NOT rare to see giant locked processes on a heavily loaded web
server.



No Giants Here:
arcmsr0: Areca SATA Host Adapter RAID Controller (RAID6 capable)

mem 0xc840-0xc8400fff,0xc880-0xc8bf irq 16 at device 14.0 on pci10

ARECA RAID ADAPTER0: Driver Version 1.20.00.13 2006-8-18
ARECA RAID ADAPTER0: FIRMWARE VERSION V1.41 2006-5-24

pass1 at arcmsr0 bus 0 target 16 lun 0
pass1: Areca RAID controller R001 Fixed Processor SCSI-0 device
da0 at arcmsr0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
da0: Areca ARC-1220-VOL#00 R001 Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device
da0: 166.666MB/s transfers (83.333MHz, offset 32, 16bit), Tagged
Queueing Enabled
da0: 1430511MB (2929687040 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 182364C)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Howmany CPU Does FreeBSD Support ?

2007-03-12 Thread Ivan Voras
Nikolas Britton wrote:
 On 3/12/07, Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Which happens to include all SCSI devices I've encountered...
 sigh.

 And it's NOT rare to see giant locked processes on a heavily loaded web
 server.

 
 No Giants Here:
 arcmsr0: Areca SATA Host Adapter RAID Controller (RAID6 capable)
 mem 0xc840-0xc8400fff,0xc880-0xc8bf irq 16 at device 14.0

I've never had an ARECA card :)

ciss0: HP Smart Array 641 port 0x3400-0x34ff mem
0xc6fee000-0xc6fe,0xc6f8-0xc6fb irq 24 at device 5.0 on pci2
ciss0: [GIANT-LOCKED]

ciss0: HP Smart Array E200i port 0x4000-0x40ff mem
0xfdf8-0xfdff,0xfdf7-0xfdf77fff irq 16 at device 8.0 on pci19
ciss0: [GIANT-LOCKED]

(it's the same driver...)

ahc0: Adaptec aic7899 Ultra160 SCSI adapter port 0xdc00-0xdcff mem
0xfea01000-0xfea01fff irq 29 at device 2.0 on pci1
ahc0: [GIANT-LOCKED]

mpt0: LSILogic SAS/SATA Adapter port 0x4000-0x40ff mem
0xe801-0xe8013fff,0xe800-0xe800 irq 19 at device 4.0 on pci3
mpt0: [GIANT-LOCKED]

isp0: Qlogic ISP 2422 PCI FC-AL Adapter port 0x4100-0x41ff mem
0xe8014000-0xe8014fff irq 20 at device 5.0 on pci3
isp0: [GIANT-LOCKED]

Hmm, LSILogic (amrd) seems not to require GIANT...




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Howmany CPU Does FreeBSD Support ?

2007-03-12 Thread Nikolas Britton

On 3/12/07, Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Nikolas Britton wrote:
 On 3/12/07, Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Which happens to include all SCSI devices I've encountered...
 sigh.

 And it's NOT rare to see giant locked processes on a heavily loaded web
 server.


 No Giants Here:
 arcmsr0: Areca SATA Host Adapter RAID Controller (RAID6 capable)
 mem 0xc840-0xc8400fff,0xc880-0xc8bf irq 16 at device 14.0

I've never had an ARECA card :)



They use Intel's XScale I/O Processors and they can do RAID6, with
RAID6 you can have two simultaneous drive failures an still be ok.
Very good / fast / expensive cards... a fully decked out ARC-1280ML
will set you back 2 grand, worth every penny.

http://www.intel.com/design/iio/index.htm
US Distributor for Areca products:
http://www.topmicrousa.com/areca-raid-cards.html
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Howmany CPU Does FreeBSD Support ?

2007-03-11 Thread Vulpes Velox
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:40:47 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  I have heard it does not scale well above 4
 
 to be clear.
 
 kernel task (disk I/O, network etc.) is always on first processor, 
 everything else on any CPU.
 
 so as long as disk I/O network and other kernel tasks are able to
 fit on one processor that's OK.
 
 for machines doing mostly pure computing 8-16 CPU may work fine,
 for machines doing mostly fileserving and routing even 2 CPUs may
 be not well utilized

That is only true if the process is giant locked. When look at dmesg,
look for things that say GIANT-LOCKED and those will be ones confined
to one processor. There has been a massive push since 5 to get ride
of those.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Howmany CPU Does FreeBSD Support ?

2007-03-10 Thread David Schulz

I have heard it does not scale well above 4
On Mar 11, 2007, at 12:45 AM, Susanth K wrote:


Dear Friends,

Howmany CPU Does The FreeBSD 6.2 Support ? and what will be the  
support in 7


THANKS IN ADVANCE

Your's Truly

SUSANTH K
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Howmany CPU Does FreeBSD Support ?

2007-03-10 Thread Susanth K

Dear Friends,

Howmany CPU Does The FreeBSD 6.2 Support ? and what will be the support in 7

THANKS IN ADVANCE

Your's Truly

SUSANTH K
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Howmany CPU Does FreeBSD Support ?

2007-03-10 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 01:18:12AM +0800, David Schulz wrote:
 I have heard it does not scale well above 4

It all depends on your workload.  FreeBSD 7.0 will have good scaling
on 8 or more CPUs on common workloads, see e.g.:

  http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/mysql.html

Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Howmany CPU Does FreeBSD Support ?

2007-03-10 Thread Ivan Voras
Susanth K wrote:
 Dear Friends,
 
 Howmany CPU Does The FreeBSD 6.2 Support ? and what will be the support
 in 7

The maximum number of CPUs that 6.2 will make use of is 16
(kern.smp.maxcpus: 16). I don't know if it will be raised in 7.0, but
since 7.x should support UltraSPARC T1, it might.

How efficient are multiple CPUs supported depends on what you want to do
with them. For example, if you plan using the machine for numerically
intensive tasks, efficiency is almost perfect :)



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Howmany CPU Does FreeBSD Support ?

2007-03-10 Thread Wojciech Puchar

It all depends on your workload.  FreeBSD 7.0 will have good scaling
on 8 or more CPUs on common workloads, see e.g.:

 http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/mysql.html

Kris


anyway it's worth to actually test machine before buying.

even for 1 cpu systems lots of crappy motherboards/BIOSES make problems 
with these all inventions like interrupt routing etc. ending with 
100Mbit/s network adapter taking 10-20% of fast CPU

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Howmany CPU Does FreeBSD Support ?

2007-03-10 Thread Wojciech Puchar

I have heard it does not scale well above 4


to be clear.

kernel task (disk I/O, network etc.) is always on first processor, 
everything else on any CPU.


so as long as disk I/O network and other kernel tasks are able to fit on 
one processor that's OK.


for machines doing mostly pure computing 8-16 CPU may work fine, for 
machines doing mostly fileserving and routing even 2 CPUs may be not well 
utilized

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Howmany CPU Does FreeBSD Support ?

2007-03-10 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 10:40:47PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
 I have heard it does not scale well above 4
 
 to be clear.
 
 kernel task (disk I/O, network etc.) is always on first processor, 
 everything else on any CPU.

This is incorrect for approximately the last 7 years (it is only true
for FreeBSD 4.x and below).

Kris


pgpWafo8UQ1NP.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Howmany CPU Does FreeBSD Support ?

2007-03-10 Thread Wojciech Puchar

to be clear.

kernel task (disk I/O, network etc.) is always on first processor,
everything else on any CPU.


This is incorrect for approximately the last 7 years (it is only true
for FreeBSD 4.x and below).

Kris


hmm.. nice.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


does FreeBSD support ms chapv2 ?

2007-02-28 Thread Only OpenSource

Hi,

Does FreeBSD support ms chapv2 protocol ?

I am trying to setup a FreeBSD server as a PPP server
that can authenticate a Windows client using MS CHAP v2.

Do I need to patch any files on the FreeBSD 6.2 RC1 to make it work ?
If yes, please let me know which files.

thanks in advance.

--
J.
oo@@oo
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: does FreeBSD support ms chapv2 ?

2007-02-28 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Feb 28), Only OpenSource said:
 Does FreeBSD support ms chapv2 protocol ?
 
 I am trying to setup a FreeBSD server as a PPP server
 that can authenticate a Windows client using MS CHAP v2.

From the ppp manpge:

  MSChapV2|chap81
Default: Disabled and Accepted.  It is very similar to standard
CHAP (type 0x05) except that it issues challenges of a fixed 16
bytes in length and uses a combination of MD4, SHA-1 and DES to
encrypt the challenge rather than using the standard MD5 mecha-
nism.

So I would guess that it is supported.  All you would have to do is add
enable mschapv2 to your ppp.conf file.


-- 
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: does FreeBSD support ms chapv2 ?

2007-02-28 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin

On 2/28/07, Only OpenSource [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi,

Does FreeBSD support ms chapv2 protocol ?

I am trying to setup a FreeBSD server as a PPP server
that can authenticate a Windows client using MS CHAP v2.

Do I need to patch any files on the FreeBSD 6.2 RC1 to make it work ?
If yes, please let me know which files.


Take a look at net/mpd4 port. It's a very nice tool
for your task.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Clevo D900K and 64 bit FreeBSD support???

2006-09-08 Thread backyard
I've been looking into replacing my current
laptop/desktop with a Clevo D900K, AMD-64 machine. I'm
just curious if anyone out there has any experience
getting FreeBSD up and running on this machine and at
what capacity (card reader, 8.1 sound card,
WLAN+Bluetooth, Hardware RAID, etc.) I was going to go
with the Nvidia Quadro graphics card and am curious on
the status of 64bit native nvidia drivers. I know it
wasn't/isn't supported as of yet. Also I was hoping to
take an existing i386 system and move it to the 64bit
system. Can I by properly specifying the environment
rebuild an i386 system to 64bit? Or am I better off/
have too install a fresh 64bit system? I would imagine
this could tick off a few ports like portupgrade that
would make rebuilding tricky at best.

I've linked to and included the machine spec for those
savy enough to look at the general hardware and know
it's level of support.

thanks,

-brian


http://www.clevo.com.tw/products/D900K.asp

link might make the following look a little nicer

D900K Specification

CPU
#12290; AMD AthlonTM 64 X2 Processor
3800+/4200+/4600+
#12288; (2.00~2.40GHz, 1MB L2 cache, socket 939)
#12290; AMD AthlonTM 64 X2 Processor 4400+/4800+
#12288; (2.20~2.40GHz, 2MB L2 cache, socket 939)
#12290; AMD AthlonTM 64 Processor FX-53/FX-55/FX-57
#12288; (2.40~2.80GHz, 1MB L2 cache, socket 939)
#12290; AMD AthlonTM 64 Processor
3000+/3200+/3400+/3500+/3800+
#12288; (1.80~2.40GHz, 512KB L2 cache, socket 939)
#12290; AMD AthlonTM 64 Processor 3700+/4000+
#12288; (2.20~2.40GHz, 1MB L2 cache, socket 939)
Core Logic  #12290;VIA K8T890CE + VT8237R
Display #12290;17.1 WXGA (1440x900) TFT / 17.1
WSXGA+ (1680x1050) / 17.1 WUXGA (1920x1200) TFT
Memory  #12290;Two 64-bit wide DDR data channels
#12290;Two 200-pin SODIMM sockets, supporting DDR 400
#12290;Expandable Memory up to 2GB, based on
256/512/1024MB SODIMM Module
Video Controller

#12290;(Option) nVIDIA QuadroTM Fx 2500
#12288;High performance graphic chip
#12290;512MB DDRIII Video RAM on board
#12290;256-bit video memroy interface
#12290;PCI-Express x16
#12290;Fully DirectX 9.0 support
#12290;Modular Design
#12290;OpenGL support
#12290;(Option) nVIDIA GeForceTM Go #12288;7900 GTX
High performance #12288;graphic chip
#12290;256MB DDRIII Video RAM on board
#12290;256-bit video memroy interface
#12290;PCI-Express x16
#12290;Fully DirectX 9.0 support
#12290;Modular Design
#12290;H.264 encode support
#12288; (HD-DVD/BD-DVD playback)   #12290;(Option)
nVIDIA GeForceTM Go 7900
#12288;GTX High performance graphic chip
#12290;512MB DDRIII Video RAM on board
#12290;256-bit video memroy interface
#12290;PCI-Express x16
#12290;Fully DirectX 9.0 support
#12290;Modular Design
#12290;H.264 encode support
#12288; (HD-DVD / BD-DVD playback)
Storage #12290;One changeable Primary 2.5 HDD
9.5mm(H)
#12290;Serial ATA HDD support
#12290;Supporting Master mode IDE ATA-100/133 (Ultra
DMA)
#12290;One changeable Primary Bay for 12.7mm(H)
DVD-ROM / Combo / DVD-Dual Driver
#12290;(Option) One external USB 1.44MB Floppy Disk
Drive
#12290;(Option) One changeable Secondary 2.5 HDD
9.5mm(H)
#12290;(Option) One changeable Secondary Bay for
12.7mm(H) DVD-ROM / Combo / DVD-Dual Driver
Keyboard#12290;Full size keyboard, with Numeric
Pad, Multi-Language support
#12290;Built-in Touchpad with scrolling function
Sound System#12290;AC'97 2.2 Compliant Interface
#12290;3D stereo enhanced sound system
#12290;Virtual 8-channel audio output
#12290;Sound-Blaster PROTM compatible
#12290;S/PDIF Digital output
#12290;SRS (Sound Retrieval System® ) / WOW 3D sound
technology
#12290;1x Built-in Microphone
#12290;4x Built-in Speakers
#12290;1x Built-in Sub woofer
#12290;1x Built-in Audio DJ Console for music CD (MP3
format compatible)
I/O Ports   #12290;4x USB 2.0 ports
#12290;2x Mini IEEE1394a ports
#12290;1x S-Video jack for TV output (HDTV support)
#12290;1x Serial port
#12290;1x Parallel port (LPT1), supporting ECP/EPP
#12290;1x Infrared Transfer port
#12290;1x DVI port
#12290;1x PS/2 port
#12290;1x Headphone jack
#12290;1x Microphone jack
#12290;1x S/PDIF output jack
#12290;1x Line-in jack for Audio input
#12290;1x RJ-45 port for LAN
#12290;1x RJ-11 port for Modem
#12290;1x DC-In jack
#12290;1x CATV input jack (optional function with
TV-Tuner module)
#12290;1x S-Video jack for Video input (optional
function with TV-Tuner module)
Slot#12290;Built-in 10-in-1 Card Reader (MS/MS
Pro/SD/MMC/CF/SM/MicroDrive/MS DUO/Mini SD/RSMMC)
#12290;1x Type II PCMCIA socket
Communication   #12290;Infrared Transfer : 115.2Kbps
SIR/4Mbps FIR, IrDA 1.1 compliant
#12290;10/100/1000BASE-T Fast Ethernet onboard
#12290;Integrated V.90/56K Azalia Modem (V.92
compliant)
#12290;(Option) 802.11b/g MiniPCI Wireless LAN Module
#12290;(Option) BluetoothTM Class II V2.0 Module,
combo with 802.11b/g Wireless LAN Module
#12290;(Factory option) 1.3M-pixel Video Camera
module
Power   #12290;Full Range 220W AC adapter - AC input
100~240V, 47~63Hz, 

How to do physical-to-virtual translation in FreeBSD? Does FreeBSD support kmap() or kmap_atomic()?

2006-04-21 Thread hongz
Hi guys:

 

We are doing HBA driver (Soft Raid5) porting from Linux to FreeBSD. As we
need to do XOR in kernel space, we need to map a physical address into a
virtual address. In Linux, we use kmap_atomic() to implement it, and could
you tell me how to do it in FreeBSD? Thank for your help!

 

Best wishes,

 

Hong Zhao

 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: How to do physical-to-virtual translation in FreeBSD? Does FreeBSD support kmap() or kmap_atomic()?

2006-04-21 Thread Andy Reitz
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi guys:



 We are doing HBA driver (Soft Raid5) porting from Linux to FreeBSD. As we
 need to do XOR in kernel space, we need to map a physical address into a
 virtual address. In Linux, we use kmap_atomic() to implement it, and could
 you tell me how to do it in FreeBSD? Thank for your help!

Hi Hong,

I'm not entirely sure, but you might want to try posting your question to
the freebsd-hackers mailing list.

Good luck,
-Andy.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Does FreeBSD support sparse kernel crash dumps?

2006-04-08 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Apr 07), Peter Wemm said:
 On Friday 07 April 2006 04:01 pm, Paul Marciano wrote:
  Do you compress the data stream at all (e.g. gzip)?
 
 No, but it could be done in theory.. if you were willing to set aside
 some memory for the compression algorithm to use.  Or just do some
 sort of simple compression (run length encoding?) The problem is that
 the dump code cannot allocate memory after the machine has crashed. 
 It has to be able to run as isolated from the rest of the kernel as
 possible in order to give a true snapshot of the undisturbed state.

This is pretty easy since zlib lets you pass in your own malloc/free
functions.  It's sufficient to pre-malloc (or simply statically
declare) a 128k block of memory, then dole it out with a simple
function that returns high_water+=asked_for_size until you get a
request that would push highwater over 128k.  A patch that does this
for 5.* on x86 only is at
http://www.allantgroup.com/FreeBSD/crashdump_compress.diff .

-- 
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Does FreeBSD support sparse kernel crash dumps?

2006-04-07 Thread Paul Marciano

Hello.  I read a while back about someone working on
supporting sparse kernel crash dumps (dumping only the
active kernel pages to the dump device as opposed to
all physical memory - for machines where the phys mem
is greater than the dump dev space.)

Does anyone know the status of that project?  Was it
committed, or are there plans to commit it?

Thanks,
Paul.


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Does FreeBSD support sparse kernel crash dumps?

2006-04-07 Thread Peter Wemm
On Friday 07 April 2006 12:47 pm, Paul Marciano wrote:
 Hello.  I read a while back about someone working on
 supporting sparse kernel crash dumps (dumping only the
 active kernel pages to the dump device as opposed to
 all physical memory - for machines where the phys mem
 is greater than the dump dev space.)

 Does anyone know the status of that project?  Was it
 committed, or are there plans to commit it?

I have a working prototype as of last night.  There should be something 
committable in the next week or two.

When I boot my 2GB machine and force a crash dump from single user mode, the 
fully debuggable vmcore file is in the 40-50MB range.  A busy machine with 
12GB ram took about 150MB to dump.

There are still some things to work out.  It was written for the amd64 kernel, 
but can be ported to i386.

-Peter
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Does FreeBSD support sparse kernel crash dumps?

2006-04-07 Thread Paul Marciano

--- Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Friday 07 April 2006 12:47 pm, Paul Marciano
 wrote:
  Hello.  I read a while back about someone working
 on
  supporting sparse kernel crash dumps (dumping only
 the
  active kernel pages to the dump device as opposed
 to
  all physical memory - for machines where the phys
 mem
  is greater than the dump dev space.)
 
  Does anyone know the status of that project?  Was
 it
  committed, or are there plans to commit it?
 
 I have a working prototype as of last night.  There
 should be something 
 committable in the next week or two.
 
 When I boot my 2GB machine and force a crash dump
 from single user mode, the 
 fully debuggable vmcore file is in the 40-50MB
 range.  A busy machine with 
 12GB ram took about 150MB to dump.
 
 There are still some things to work out.  It was
 written for the amd64 kernel, 
 but can be ported to i386.
 
 -Peter
 


That's very timely news Peter.  Do you think your code
is easily back-portable to 5.4?  Are the changes
limited to dump_machdep.c or otherwise not dependent
on a great deal of -current updates?

Do you compress the data stream at all (e.g. gzip)?


I have a specific need on a CompactFlash based system.
 I have a 256MB IDE mode card on a machine with 512MB
physical memory.  I can probably commit 128MB of the
card as a dumpdev but I can't go beyond that.

Good luck with it.

Regards,
Paul.


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Does FreeBSD support sparse kernel crash dumps?

2006-04-07 Thread Peter Wemm
On Friday 07 April 2006 04:01 pm, Paul Marciano wrote:
 --- Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Friday 07 April 2006 12:47 pm, Paul Marciano
 
  wrote:
   Hello.  I read a while back about someone working
 
  on
 
   supporting sparse kernel crash dumps (dumping only
 
  the
 
   active kernel pages to the dump device as opposed
 
  to
 
   all physical memory - for machines where the phys
 
  mem
 
   is greater than the dump dev space.)
  
   Does anyone know the status of that project?  Was
 
  it
 
   committed, or are there plans to commit it?
 
  I have a working prototype as of last night.  There
  should be something
  committable in the next week or two.
 
  When I boot my 2GB machine and force a crash dump
  from single user mode, the
  fully debuggable vmcore file is in the 40-50MB
  range.  A busy machine with
  12GB ram took about 150MB to dump.
 
  There are still some things to work out.  It was
  written for the amd64 kernel,
  but can be ported to i386.
 
  -Peter

 That's very timely news Peter.  Do you think your code
 is easily back-portable to 5.4?  Are the changes
 limited to dump_machdep.c or otherwise not dependent
 on a great deal of -current updates?

My WIP is relative to 6.x.  It will port forwards to current fairly easily, 
and will port to i386 trivially.  The code would be simpler on i386 because 
direct map data doesn't exist there.  But on the other hand, i386 has to deal 
with PAE mode and the dump code would be significantly impacted by PAE mode

Changes are mostly in sys/amd64/amd64/dump_machdep.c (a rewrite actually), an 
8 line addition to sys/vm/vm_page.c and some trivial patches to some other MD 
pmap files.  libkvm is affected as a complete rewrite of 
lib/libkvm/kvm_amd64.c.  (Porting libkvm changes to i386 will be easy and 
relatively immune to PAE kernel effects). 

 Do you compress the data stream at all (e.g. gzip)?

No, but it could be done in theory.. if you were willing to set aside some 
memory for the compression algorithm to use.  Or just do some sort of simple 
compression (run length encoding?)  The problem is that the dump code cannot 
allocate memory after the machine has crashed.  It has to be able  to run as 
isolated from the rest of the kernel as possible in order to give a true 
snapshot of the undisturbed state.

 I have a specific need on a CompactFlash based system.
  I have a 256MB IDE mode card on a machine with 512MB
 physical memory.  I can probably commit 128MB of the
 card as a dumpdev but I can't go beyond that.

I truely do not know what to expect.  Without compression, check the 
difference between sysctl vm.kvm_free and vm.kvm_size to know how much an 
uncompressed minidump would take.  I don't recall if those are on 5.4 or not 
(the code for those sysctl's would backport from pmap.c really easily).

 Good luck with it.

 Regards,
 Paul.

-Peter

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: FreeBSD Support (Commerical)

2005-10-07 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew P.
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 12:51 PM
To: Kris Kennaway
Cc: Ansar Mohammed; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Support (Commerical)


On 10/6/05, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 12:10:58PM -0400, Ansar Mohammed wrote:
  I guess I am interested in finding out if there is support
that is offered
  by the FreeBSD project, not from third party vendors.

 Not commercial support, since FreeBSD isn't a commercial project.

 Kris




I'm sorry, but all effective legislative systems (including
that of the USA) allow officially non-profit and non-
commercial organizations to take on commercial
activities. And many such organizations exercise this
right.

IMHO, there's no official commercial support, because
money can hardly buy more than what's already
available for free.

This is frankly rediculous.

The question of whether the Project offers commercial support depends
highly on your definition of The FreeBSD Project

The official FreeBSD Project membership is comprised of a great many
individuals.  A lot of those individuals work at companies that sell
FreeBSD consultative support.  I think therefore the question of whether
the Project offers support or not is moot.  Yes, it does from an
individual
level.

Ted

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


FreeBSD Support (Commerical)

2005-10-06 Thread Ansar Mohammed
Does the FreeBSD project offer commercial support? I notice that the FreeBSD
mall offers commercial support.
 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD Support (Commerical)

2005-10-06 Thread Kevin Kinsey

Ansar Mohammed wrote:


Does the FreeBSD project offer commercial support? I notice that the FreeBSD
mall offers commercial support.

 



It's a fine question, but it's well documented on the Project's
web site:

http://www.freebsd.org/support.html

Kevin Kinsey
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD Support (Commerical)

2005-10-06 Thread Ansar Mohammed
I guess I am interested in finding out if there is support that is offered
by the FreeBSD project, not from third party vendors.

On 10/6/05, Kevin Kinsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Ansar Mohammed wrote:

 Does the FreeBSD project offer commercial support? I notice that the
 FreeBSD
 mall offers commercial support.
 
 
 

 It's a fine question, but it's well documented on the Project's
 web site:

 http://www.freebsd.org/support.html

 Kevin Kinsey

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD Support (Commerical)

2005-10-06 Thread Andrew P.
On 10/6/05, Ansar Mohammed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I guess I am interested in finding out if there is support that is offered
 by the FreeBSD project, not from third party vendors.

FreeBSD offers non-commercial support through
mailing-lists and doc-project (FAQs and Handbooks)
which is probably the most comprehensive,
active and effective support there is.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD Support (Commerical)

2005-10-06 Thread Christian Kuhtz


Yeah, but also the most irrelevant when it comes to supply chain folk.

On Oct 6, 2005, at 12:45 PM, Andrew P. wrote:


On 10/6/05, Ansar Mohammed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I guess I am interested in finding out if there is support that is  
offered

by the FreeBSD project, not from third party vendors.



FreeBSD offers non-commercial support through
mailing-lists and doc-project (FAQs and Handbooks)
which is probably the most comprehensive,
active and effective support there is.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD Support (Commerical)

2005-10-06 Thread Foo JH
 FreeBSD offers non-commercial support through
 mailing-lists and doc-project (FAQs and Handbooks)
 which is probably the most comprehensive,
 active and effective support there is.
It's a blame game as much as it is a genuine need for commercial help. As
much as mailing lists and community support are strong and effective, that's
not the kind of comfort level that corporates are going for, especially if
they are betting their million-dollar product/ server on it.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD Support (Commerical)

2005-10-06 Thread Jerry McAllister
 
 I guess I am interested in finding out if there is support that is offered
 by the FreeBSD project, not from third party vendors.

Basically FreeBSD support is what you see on the web page.
In some sense, you could say that all of FreeBSD- development 
and support - is by third party sources or maybe that all third
party contributers are part of the FreeBSD project at some level.

In other words, development in FreeBSD land comes from those who
use it to provide services - of any kind including supporting
other's use of it for hire.

But, no, the FreeBSD project per se does not offer commercial support.

jerry

 
 On 10/6/05, Kevin Kinsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Ansar Mohammed wrote:
 
  Does the FreeBSD project offer commercial support? I notice that the
  FreeBSD
  mall offers commercial support.
  
  
  
 
  It's a fine question, but it's well documented on the Project's
  web site:
 
  http://www.freebsd.org/support.html
 
  Kevin Kinsey
 
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD Support (Commerical)

2005-10-06 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 12:10:58PM -0400, Ansar Mohammed wrote:
 I guess I am interested in finding out if there is support that is offered
 by the FreeBSD project, not from third party vendors.

Not commercial support, since FreeBSD isn't a commercial project.

Kris


pgpOutCgq3qeA.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: FreeBSD Support (Commerical)

2005-10-06 Thread Andrew P.
On 10/6/05, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 12:10:58PM -0400, Ansar Mohammed wrote:
  I guess I am interested in finding out if there is support that is offered
  by the FreeBSD project, not from third party vendors.

 Not commercial support, since FreeBSD isn't a commercial project.

 Kris




I'm sorry, but all effective legislative systems (including
that of the USA) allow officially non-profit and non-
commercial organizations to take on commercial
activities. And many such organizations exercise this
right.

IMHO, there's no official commercial support, because
money can hardly buy more than what's already
available for free.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD Support (Commerical)

2005-10-06 Thread Danny Howard
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 12:55:58PM -0400, Christian Kuhtz wrote:
 
 Yeah, but also the most irrelevant when it comes to supply chain folk.

Supply-chain folk?  Is that a euphemism for suits?

My employer is audited by clients on a regular basis.  If you have your
internal documentation and processes together, it doesn't seem to bother
any of the corporate-types we run up against in the health-care industry
that we are running a freely-available, open-source OS.

If you require commercial support I'd like to think there is a
commercial entity that can lease such an option to you.  The FreeBSD
foundation hasn't gone down that road yet, unlike some other projects.
Maybe someday, but if you need a commercial support option that is
co-branded with your Operating System, you could do worse than Solaris,
or Red Hat Enterprise.

-danny

 On 10/6/05, Ansar Mohammed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I guess I am interested in finding out if there is support that is  
 offered
 by the FreeBSD project, not from third party vendors.
 
 
 FreeBSD offers non-commercial support through
 mailing-lists and doc-project (FAQs and Handbooks)
 which is probably the most comprehensive,
 active and effective support there is.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD Support (Commerical)

2005-10-06 Thread Jerry McAllister
 
 On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 12:55:58PM -0400, Christian Kuhtz wrote:
  
  Yeah, but also the most irrelevant when it comes to supply chain folk.
 
 Supply-chain folk?  Is that a euphemism for suits?

Supply Chain Management is a whole field which probably most people 
from the old days might have called the purchasing department.

jerry

 My employer is audited by clients on a regular basis.  If you have your
 internal documentation and processes together, it doesn't seem to bother
 any of the corporate-types we run up against in the health-care industry
 that we are running a freely-available, open-source OS.
 
 If you require commercial support I'd like to think there is a
 commercial entity that can lease such an option to you.  The FreeBSD
 foundation hasn't gone down that road yet, unlike some other projects.
 Maybe someday, but if you need a commercial support option that is
 co-branded with your Operating System, you could do worse than Solaris,
 or Red Hat Enterprise.

I think there are some persons out there who sell FreeBSD support
for a fee.

jerry

 
 -danny
 
  On 10/6/05, Ansar Mohammed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  I guess I am interested in finding out if there is support that is  
  offered
  by the FreeBSD project, not from third party vendors.
  
  
  FreeBSD offers non-commercial support through
  mailing-lists and doc-project (FAQs and Handbooks)
  which is probably the most comprehensive,
  active and effective support there is.
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


recommended raid cards with freebsd support,

2005-09-20 Thread Gerald de la Pascua
Hi, I have a problem, we have been using the 3ware raid cards which mike put 
me on to and they 
have been great, 
 however, I have just built a new machine, abit 8w and pentiumD processor, 
and all was fine until I put the raid card in, it just hangs with the 3ware 
message. 
 I have raised it with 3ware, and they say the board is not tested with that 
chipset, 
I have tested the card on another machine, where it works fine. 
 I am not getting the feeling that 3ware are going to be able to resolve 
this any time soon,
 So that's the background, given that I already have all this kit, and the 
parallel 
250MB drives, could anyone suggest alternative raid cards that they have 
good experiences of (and have some gui support in freebsd), so that then 
I can investigate whether they might work with my current set up ??
 thanks in advance for any suggestions, 
 Gerald
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Questions about FreeBSD support for Multiple Monitors IPv6 Protocol

2005-06-10 Thread Matthew Jordan


  Does FreeBSD, Xorg or the Window Managers have support for more than
  one Monitor, and if so how would I enable that feature?

  Can I use IPv6 Protocol with FreeBSD on my internal network if I
  wanted to?
_

  Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! [1]MSN Messenger
  Download today it's FREE!

References

  1. http://g.msn.com/8HMBEN/2728??PS=47575
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Questions about FreeBSD support for Multiple Monitors IPv6 Protocol

2005-06-10 Thread Björn König

Matthew Jordan wrote:


  Does FreeBSD, Xorg or the Window Managers have support for more than
  one Monitor, and if so how would I enable that feature?


X.org supports this feature. I can offer a sample configuration that 
works for me:


http://www.alpha-tierchen.de/dateien/etc/xorg.conf-dual.txt


  Can I use IPv6 Protocol with FreeBSD on my internal network if I
  wanted to?


Yes, read the IPv6 section of the handbook

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-ipv6.html

if you need further information about this topic.

Björn
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Questions about FreeBSD support for Multiple Monitors IPv6 Protocol

2005-06-10 Thread Mario Hoerich
# Matthew Jordan:
 
   Does FreeBSD, Xorg or the Window Managers have support for more than
   one Monitor, and if so how would I enable that feature?
 
There are multiple ways to do this, i.e. xinerama.  Try googling
for multiple monitors xorg or something like that.

If you use the nVidia-driver from ports, it's even easier,
I just modified my xorg.conf:

  Section Device
  Identifier  NV AGP
  Driver  nvidia
  BusID   PCI:1:0:0
  Option  TwinView on
  Option  MetaModes 1280x1024,1280x1024; 1024x768,NULL
  Option  SecondMonitorHorizSync 28-64
  Option  SecondMonitorVertRefresh 60
  Option  TwinViewOrientation LeftOf
  EndSection


   Can I use IPv6 Protocol with FreeBSD on my internal network if I
   wanted to?

I haven't tried, but in all probability: yes.

 HTH,
Mario
-- 
 Für Gegner der Reform wird ein Wagen, der an die Wand gefahren
  wurde, nicht dadurch wieder flott, dass man zwei seiner Räder
  für intakt erklärt.
   -- Hermann Unterstöger, SZ, über die Rechtschraipreform
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: FreeBSD Support Provider

2005-04-18 Thread Ron Tschanschek
Hello!
 
A good few months ago I was searching your site, looking for details of
any organisations that were located close to me, that provided FreeBSD
support. Unless I'm going mad, I seem to remember a company in West
Yorkshire, located not very far away from Halifax, which did just that.
I remember going to their website, which was linked from FreeBSD.org,
but I now cannot find hide or hair of them. Can you give me any clue's
as to who the company might have been?
 
Hope to hear from you soon.
 
Best regards,
 
Ron Tschanschek
JBG Computer Services Ltd
Tel:   +44 (0)1422 31
Fax:  +44 (0)1422 311133
Mobile:  +44 (0)7831 432788
Email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web:www.jbg.co.uk http://www.jbg.co.uk/ 
 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Hardware dongle with FreeBSD support?

2005-03-10 Thread jonas
Hi

On Wednesday 09 March 2005 15:34, cyb wrote:
  Anyone here who can recommend a dongle with decent support for FreeBSD?

 http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-February/077838.h
tml http://bsdnews.org/03/cryptusb.php

An ancrypted filesystem on a USB stick is nice, but the main idea of a dongle 
is to store information, that only the owner can change. (The data on it 
needs to be protected from the customer, not somebody who might steal the 
dongle.)


-- 
br.
j.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Hardware dongle with FreeBSD support?

2005-03-10 Thread jonas
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 18:50, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
  Anyone here who can recommend a dongle with decent support for FreeBSD?

 See http://www.safenet-inc.com. They make dongles and (USB) hardware
 keys for software products and they mention support for Linux and OS X,
 so they may have something.

Great! Those guys seem to have drivers for FreeBSD 5.0+ for programming their 
USB dongles.

Thanks Anthony

-- 
br.
j.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hardware dongle with FreeBSD support?

2005-03-09 Thread jonas
Hello questions-list!

I'd like to know if anyone here is aware of a hardware manufacturer or 
supplier that offers dongles with FreeBSD support? (A small piece of hardware 
to plug into a USB or serial/parallel port with the possibility to store 
encrypted information on it.)

Background: The company I work for sells a system running on FreeBSD and we 
need to have this kind of copy protection and the possibility to store some 
bits of information on the dongle. Our current solutions already includes a 
parallel port dongle (WIBUKEY), but the driver for this one is capable to 
check for existence only, not to store to and retrieve information from it. 
So we are looking for an alternative.

Anyone here who can recommend a dongle with decent support for FreeBSD?


-- 
br.
j.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Hardware dongle with FreeBSD support?

2005-03-09 Thread cyb
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 15:15 +0100, jonas wrote:
 Hello questions-list!
 
 I'd like to know if anyone here is aware of a hardware manufacturer or 
 supplier that offers dongles with FreeBSD support? (A small piece of hardware 
 to plug into a USB or serial/parallel port with the possibility to store 
 encrypted information on it.)
 
 Background: The company I work for sells a system running on FreeBSD and we 
 need to have this kind of copy protection and the possibility to store some 
 bits of information on the dongle. Our current solutions already includes a 
 parallel port dongle (WIBUKEY), but the driver for this one is capable to 
 check for existence only, not to store to and retrieve information from it. 
 So we are looking for an alternative.
 
 Anyone here who can recommend a dongle with decent support for FreeBSD?

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-February/077838.html
http://bsdnews.org/03/cryptusb.php

Andreas

-- 
GnuPG key  : 0xD25FCC81  |  http://cyb.websimplex.de/pubkey.asc
Fingerprint: D182 6F22 7EEC DD4C 0F6E  564C 691B 0372 D25F CC81



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Hardware dongle with FreeBSD support?

2005-03-09 Thread Anthony Atkielski
jonas writes:

 Background: The company I work for sells a system running on FreeBSD and we
 need to have this kind of copy protection and the possibility to store some
 bits of information on the dongle. Our current solutions already includes a
 parallel port dongle (WIBUKEY), but the driver for this one is capable to
 check for existence only, not to store to and retrieve information from it.
 So we are looking for an alternative.

 Anyone here who can recommend a dongle with decent support for FreeBSD?

See http://www.safenet-inc.com. They make dongles and (USB) hardware
keys for software products and they mention support for Linux and OS X,
so they may have something.

-- 
Anthony


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Does FreeBSD support Intel E7210 Chipsets

2005-01-19 Thread Freebsd0101
In a message dated 1/18/05 7:35:10 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I do not know if you are aware, but somebody else has
already had this idea.  The website is
www.dragonflybsd.org.

But please, learn how to be calm in the face of
adversity, and not resort to name calling (just try to
generally be civil) before contributing to their
cause.

I'm sure that the DragonFly BSD group would appreciate
it.
--
Actually, this is the first truly useful bit of info that I've seen
on this list. Matt Dillon was a key loss (among many others)
from the original FreeBSD team. It seems from DragonFly's
mission statement that they have a much clearer understanding
of what's needed by high-end users. I'll have my tech fire
it up and see what sizzles.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Does FreeBSD support Intel E7210 Chipsets

2005-01-18 Thread Hexren
Currently I am evaluating mainboards for building myself a FreeBSD
Server that will be colocated. At this moment my heart is lost in love
to a server which features an Intel E7210 Chipset there would be an Intel®
Pentium® 4 3,0GHz HT-technology Prescott running on that board.

Has somebody (preferably not the troll I think I heard ranting about
this some time ago ;) ) experience with this Chipset ?

Thank you
Hexren

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Does FreeBSD support Intel E7210 Chipsets

2005-01-18 Thread Freebsd0101
too bad, because I know the answer. Cheers.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Does FreeBSD support Intel E7210 Chipsets

2005-01-18 Thread Butterworth, Thaddaeus (Manpower Contract)
Gary,
Maybe if you offered solutions instead of whining and bashing all the
time people would be interested in what you have to say. All we've ever
seen you do is throw out insults and complain. If FreeBSD is so bad, use
another OS. 
I'm sure Microsoft would be more than happy to have you shell out the
money for their products, and you'd get the sort of support you want
-er, well, sort of. That's all I'm going to say on the matter.


Thad


http://www.pftalk.com/ftopic3988.html 6th post




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 2:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD support Intel E7210 Chipsets

too bad, because I know the answer. Cheers.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Does FreeBSD support Intel E7210 Chipsets

2005-01-18 Thread K. Greenwood

--- Butterworth, Thaddaeus (Manpower Contract)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Gary,
 Maybe if you offered solutions instead of whining
 and bashing all the
 time people would be interested in what you have to
 say. All we've ever
 seen you do is throw out insults and complain. If
 FreeBSD is so bad, use
 another OS. 
 I'm sure Microsoft would be more than happy to have
 you shell out the
 money for their products, and you'd get the sort of
 support you want
 -er, well, sort of. That's all I'm going to say on
 the matter.
 
 
 Thad

snipped

 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 2:15 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
 Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD support Intel E7210
 Chipsets
 
 too bad, because I know the answer. Cheers.

snipped

Considering the response this illicited, I refuse to
consider even responding to a message that makes a
personal slander against anothers surname.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And from where do you get that I think FreeBSD is
bad? FreeBSD 4.x
is great. I just wish they'd support it instead of
calling 5.x a 
production
release before its even close to 4.x performance
standards.

I do not know if you are aware, but somebody else has
already had this idea.  The website is
www.dragonflybsd.org.

But please, learn how to be calm in the face of
adversity, and not resort to name calling (just try to
generally be civil) before contributing to their
cause.

I'm sure that the DragonFly BSD group would appreciate
it.

Consider this my last message sent on this topic
(unless constructive, and appropriate).



__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today! 
http://my.yahoo.com 
 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: does FreeBSD support nvidia ethernet?

2004-12-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joshua Lokken wrote:
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 19:38:51 +0300, alexei kozlov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, Gurus.
I have EPOX 8rda3 motherboard based on nvidia2  chipset with 2 ethernet
interfaces.
One is well known -- rtl8139. It works (great).
The other is based on nvidia chipset. And I do not know what to do to
activate it in FreeBSD. What driver support this ethernet interface.

I believe the appropriate driver lives in:
/usr/ports/net/nvnet

Great! Thanks.
Alexei
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


does FreeBSD support nvidia ethernet?

2004-12-24 Thread alexei kozlov
Hello, Gurus.
I have EPOX 8rda3 motherboard based on nvidia2  chipset with 2 ethernet 
interfaces.
One is well known -- rtl8139. It works (great).
The other is based on nvidia chipset. And I do not know what to do to 
activate it in FreeBSD. What driver support this ethernet interface.

Thanks,
Alexei
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: does FreeBSD support nvidia ethernet?

2004-12-24 Thread Joshua Lokken
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 19:38:51 +0300, alexei kozlov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello, Gurus.
 
 I have EPOX 8rda3 motherboard based on nvidia2  chipset with 2 ethernet
 interfaces.
 One is well known -- rtl8139. It works (great).
 The other is based on nvidia chipset. And I do not know what to do to
 activate it in FreeBSD. What driver support this ethernet interface.

I believe the appropriate driver lives in:

/usr/ports/net/nvnet


-- 
Joshua Lokken
Open Source Advocate
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


FreeBSD support of RealTek sound chips (HP box)?

2004-12-13 Thread Doug Lee
I recently encountered an HP computer with what I regard as a unique
built-in sound system based on RealTek chips:  It breaks out (under
Windows XP anyway) into five devices:  one playback device and four
recording devices.  Most sound systems present one device with both
record and playback channels.  Since FreeBSD seems to have trouble
in many cases with simultaneous record and playback on the same
device, I thought this might actually be a significant benefit under
FreeBSD compared to more conventional chipsets... but it would be
difficult to test my theory on this, the only such box I have seen.
I'm asking the list because, if this works, I'll probably buy a box
just like it for myself.

Please Cc me directly.


-- 
Doug Lee   [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.dlee.org
Bartimaeus Group   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.bartsite.com
The best executive is the one who has sense enough to pick good men to do
what he wants done, and self-restraint enough to keep from meddling with
them while they do it.--Theodore Roosevelt
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD support of 3Com 3C2000-T NIC

2004-11-02 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Martin Hudec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 is 3Com gigabit 3C2000-T nic supported in FreeBSD4/5? If not, which gigabit 
 nic can you recommend to use?

The documentation doesn't describe the hardware in enough detail to be
sure without trying one (or at least seeing one, to be able to read
the chipset information off the chips).  

I *suspect* they should work, because they seem to be 3Com's
replacement for some older Tigon-based cards that I am using 
successfully.  But naturally the hardware may have changed completely
in the redesign...

-- 
Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area
http://be-well.ilk.org:8088/~lowell/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


FreeBSD support of 3Com 3C2000-T NIC

2004-10-31 Thread Martin Hudec
Hello,

is 3Com gigabit 3C2000-T nic supported in FreeBSD4/5? If not, which gigabit 
nic can you recommend to use?

thank you.

-- 
martin hudec


   * 421 907 303 393
   * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   * http://www.aeternal.net

Nothing travels faster than the speed of light with the possible 
exception of bad news, which obeys its own special laws.

   Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy


pgpQvmuQc7PY5.pgp
Description: PGP signature


FreeBSD support for TCP-Offload Engine NICs

2004-08-12 Thread Siddhartha Jain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Does FreeBSD support any TOE cards from say Adaptec or Intel? Can
DUMMYNET use the TCP offloading part to do its job more efficiently?
Thanks,
Siddhartha

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBG1UTOGaxOP7knVwRAjNSAJ9yiI2dkJPInkQF5MQOttJntlv3CACdGvok
EyEoPZPjnu4Ep4v67TDyoY0=
=ylLu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


FreeBSD support

2004-01-18 Thread
Hello Support,
I have a problem my floppy drive does not want to work.
when my FreeBSD 5.1 boots I have a message
fdc0: cmd 3 faild at out byte 1 of 3
and
cannot reserve I/O port range (6 port)

After logining I cannot use my floppy drive- there is no device file.
What should I do?

  

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexey  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: FreeBSD support

2004-01-18 Thread fbsd_user
This boot error message general means that your floppy drive is
broken.
When was the last time you used it?
Try to verify that it's in working order by booting an MS/Window
system on that PC,
or swap that floppy drive with one from some other PC that you can
test works first.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of 

Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 8:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FreeBSD support

Hello Support,
I have a problem my floppy drive does not want to work.
when my FreeBSD 5.1 boots I have a message
fdc0: cmd 3 faild at out byte 1 of 3
and
cannot reserve I/O port range (6 port)

After logining I cannot use my floppy drive- there is no device
file.
What should I do?



--
Best regards,
 Alexey  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD support

2004-01-18 Thread Uwe Laverenz
fbsd_user wrote:

This boot error message general means that your floppy drive is
broken.
Not necessarily, this can also be a FreeBSD bug. I have several boards 
where this error occurs when ACPI is enabled. It's not a hardware 
problem. The floppy drives work with other systems, but not with 
FreeBSD+ACPI (4.9 - 5.1).

cu,
Uwe
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  1   2   >