On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Nikos Vassiliadis nv...@gmx.com wrote:
Was the rate of ARPs the problem?
Nikos, unfortunately, I'm not sure.
It was one of those things where in an effort to quickly fix things, I
split up the collision domain and used a router to handle the ARP.
Right now, a
On May 27, 2011, at 3:31 PM, Rogelio wrote:
It was one of those things where in an effort to quickly fix things, I
split up the collision domain and used a router to handle the ARP.
Right now, a 7201 router has about 15K ARPs, and the system is much slower.
I'm not surprised. Even good
On 5/23/2011 10:46 PM, Rogelio wrote:
I found that a certain Linux gateway was having a difficult time with
thousands of ARP entries (about 13K concurrent ARP entries in 10 min
from ISP subscribers), so I put it behind a Cisco 7201 router and
added an IP helper to the interface. Now it seems to
I found that a certain Linux gateway was having a difficult time with
thousands of ARP entries (about 13K concurrent ARP entries in 10 min
from ISP subscribers), so I put it behind a Cisco 7201 router and
added an IP helper to the interface. Now it seems to be working much
much better.
In the
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Wojciech Puchar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the software admin told me that the permissions should be very open on the
directories and files
so i made them 0777. the software worked like a charm for about 2 months
but
after that
at some point the client
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:43:03 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the software admin told me that the permissions should be very open
on the directories and files
so i made them 0777. the software worked like a charm for about 2
months but after that
at some point the
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Manfred Usselmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:43:03 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the software admin told me that the permissions should be very open
on the directories and files
so i made them 0777. the
if it could work for 2 months and then refused - something must have been
changed on the client software side.
No Mr. Puchar nothing changed on the client side.
so what changed on server side so it stopped working after 2 months?
in unix there are no magic things - things works or not.
i didn't
had the time to debug it to find out the problem. I would like to know what
happened there.
The good thing is that a future client of my company works with the same
accounting software
and the server runs FBSD so if something goes wrong i'll have the time to
debug properly.
it may be
Charles Mason wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Wojciech Puchar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am very interrested by feedback of real world samba admins running it
with FreeBSD
or Linux , my boss push hardly to use Linux but I would much prefer
FreeBSD
do what your boss wants. it's his
hello list,
a little story about samba and FreeBSD.
I had to make a file server for a company that uses a program for
accounting. that software works with lots of files to do the job.
the software admin told me that the permissions should be very open on the
directories and files
so i made them
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Valentin Bud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello list,
a little story about samba and FreeBSD.
I had to make a file server for a company that uses a program for
accounting. that software works with lots of files to do the job.
the software admin told me that the
Hello list,
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Odhiambo Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Valentin Bud [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
hello list,
a little story about samba and FreeBSD.
I had to make a file server for a company that uses a program for
the software admin told me that the permissions should be very open on the
directories and files
so i made them 0777. the software worked like a charm for about 2 months but
after that
at some point the client couldn't access the files on the samba server.
if it could work for 2 months and then
Valentin Bud wrote:
hello list,
a little story about samba and FreeBSD.
I had to make a file server for a company that uses a program for
accounting. that software works with lots of files to do the job.
the software admin told me that the permissions should be very open on the
directories and
Frank Bonnet schrieb:
I am on the way to setup a brand new Samba server with OpenLDAP backend
I am very interrested by feedback of real world samba admins running
it with FreeBSD
or Linux , my boss push hardly to use Linux but I would much prefer FreeBSD
so good arguments are welcome ( my
Hello
I am on the way to setup a brand new Samba server with OpenLDAP backend
I am very interrested by feedback of real world samba admins running it with
FreeBSD
or Linux , my boss push hardly to use Linux but I would much prefer FreeBSD
so good arguments are welcome ( my boss is a smart guy
I am very interrested by feedback of real world samba admins running it
with FreeBSD
or Linux , my boss push hardly to use Linux but I would much prefer FreeBSD
do what your boss wants. it's his company, and it's his right to make bad
decision
On Friday 17 October 2008 10:42:05 Wojciech Puchar wrote:
do what your boss wants. it's his company, and it's his right to make bad
decision
This is off-topic, but I wholly disagree. As a professional employee, it's my
job to advise my boss on technological matters, and to persuade him to
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Wojciech Puchar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am very interrested by feedback of real world samba admins running it
with FreeBSD
or Linux , my boss push hardly to use Linux but I would much prefer
FreeBSD
do what your boss wants. it's his company, and it's his
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 04:34:00PM +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
I am on the way to setup a brand new Samba server with OpenLDAP backend
I am very interrested by feedback of real world samba admins running it
with FreeBSD
or Linux , my boss push hardly to use Linux but I would much
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 05:13:45PM +0100, Charles Mason wrote:
From what I have seen, both are perfectly capable and since its samba
that will be doing most of the actual work its probably doesn't matter
that much. Of course the next question if he goes with Linux, is which
distro. Perhaps the
On Friday 17 October 2008 18:55:19 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 05:13:45PM +0100, Charles Mason wrote:
From what I have seen, both are perfectly capable and since its samba
that will be doing most of the actual work its probably doesn't matter
that much. Of course the next
decision
This is off-topic, but I wholly disagree. As a professional employee, it's my
job to advise my boss on technological matters,
yes - advise
no - persuade!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
If he's a good boss (as the poster seem to be implying) then he will
be asking because he hasn't made his mind up his mind completely, but
yeah don't get fired over it :)
in most cases and with system doing ONLY samba, both linux and freebsd
will work fine.
so his boss is not smart for sure
Uit een eerder bericht (17-10-2008 17:42):
do what your boss wants. it's his company, and it's his right to make
bad decision
A boss hires someone that knows what he/she is talking about and relies
on his/her vision. To get informed this person might get his/her
information before he/she
A boss hires someone that knows what he/she is talking about and relies on
his/her vision.
so - he/she should not persuade what OS will be, just WHAT should be done.
To get informed this person might get his/her information
before he/she decides what the best solution might be; I do hope
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Frank Bonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I am on the way to setup a brand new Samba server with OpenLDAP backend
I am very interrested by feedback of real world samba admins running it
with FreeBSD
or Linux , my boss push hardly to use Linux but I would
Hi All,
i am looking into implementing a piece of the V4L interface. this
involves mmap'ing from userspace into kernelspace.
in mplayer, this is what is called:
tvi_v4l2.c:
priv-map[i].addr = mmap (0, priv-map[i].buf.length, PROT_READ |
PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
does mmap work on freebsd as it works on linux? ie: can i mmap
any device? are there constraints on the device which should be
met?
U ... man 2 mmap?
Robert Huff
___
I'm not really an expert on this but here goes...
On Wednesday 18 April 2007 18:05:44 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
i am looking into implementing a piece of the V4L interface. this
involves mmap'ing from userspace into kernelspace.
in mplayer, this is what is called:
tvi_v4l2.c:
On 18 Jan 2006, at 17:17, Nikolas Britton wrote:
On 1/17/06, Philip Hallstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The computer is currently without keyboard, mouse or monitor. I am
adding applications to the computer via ssh while I work. As
soon as I
get openbox and tightvnc installed, I'll switch
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Adam Nealis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 3:13 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Graham Bentley; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: FreeBSD vs Linux
--- Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you
-Original Message-
From: Adam Nealis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 2:59 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Graham Bentley; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Linux
I disagree with that. The guidelines for using this list recommend
searching
: FreeBSD vs Linux
Damn, I just fell into the same old trap. This is a questions
list about FreeBSD. I already use it (as well as other OS's)
What do I care about the arguments for and against xy and z?
Thinking about it now, if I was asking the same question and
someone said Why not try out
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 3:28 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Linux
Damn, I just fell into the same old trap. This is a questions
list about FreeBSD. I already use it (as well as other OS's)
What do I care about the arguments for and against xy and z
What do you say to the people who want to do some research before
putting the time into installing it?
Ted
http://www.freesbie.org/
;-)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 01:19:38 -0800
Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you say to the people who want to do some research before
putting the time into installing it?
Ted
http://www.freebsd.org/
http://www.freebsddiary.org/topics.php
http://www.onlamp.com/bsd/
--- Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Danial Thom
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:54 AM
To: Dick Davies; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Linux
Microsoft
-Original Message-
From: Adam Nealis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 3:13 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Graham Bentley; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: FreeBSD vs Linux
--- Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you say to the people who
-Original Message-
From: Danial Thom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 12:36 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Dick Davies; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: FreeBSD vs Linux
More rambling, useless points from Ted. Whether
its written from scratch
is freebsd better than linux kind of question is perfectly legitimate.
Is FreeBSD more suitible as a desktop system with
a 200mHz pentium-pro and a 4 gigabyte hard-drive
than windows 3.11 on dos 6.22 on vmware on top
of Solaris 10? is perfectly legitimate.
Is FreeBSD better than Slackware? is
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 10:13 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Linux
is freebsd better than linux kind of question is perfectly
legitimate.
Is FreeBSD
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 08:03:15PM +0100, Mathias Menzel-Nielsen wrote:
My hardware is fully supported by FreeBSD and in fact some of it was
supported earlier on FreeBSD than on Linux.
For example, the Brooktree bktr(4) Video-Capture driver existed first on
FreeBSD, also high-speed
Damn, I just fell into the same old trap. This is a questions
list about FreeBSD. I already use it (as well as other OS's)
What do I care about the arguments for and against xy and z?
Thinking about it now, if I was asking the same question and
someone said Why not try out FreeBSD and make
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Danial Thom
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:54 AM
To: Dick Davies; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Linux
Microsoft pays hardware manufacturers to
make drivers for their OS
Windows almost runs everything
Quite the opposite, try running some application from a few years back
on windows 200 or XP, big chance it won't work.
Unix has not matured yet to compete with Microsoft.
Yeah, let's just forget that UNIX had stuff like network support
before windows even
[Let me first point out I've seen about 4 different 'unix/windows is
teh gayz0r' threads on completely unrelated mailing lists in the last
24 hours.
If I sound bored rigid with the whole subject that might be why.]
Can we please stop comparing *NIX to windows. They're nothing
like each other.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the essential difference
between FreeBSD and Linux (Fedora for instance)?
Where can I find any list of differences?
What/Where are the advantages of FreeBSD vs Linux?
Greetings
Greg
___
freebsd-questions
On 2006-01-18 16:55, Matias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the essential difference between FreeBSD and Linux (Fedora
for instance)? Where can I find any list of differences?
What/Where are the advantages of FreeBSD vs Linux?
Give a look at gentoo it's
On Jan 18, 2006, at 10:55 AM, Matias wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the essential difference
between FreeBSD and Linux (Fedora for instance)?
Where can I find any list of differences?
What/Where are the advantages of FreeBSD vs Linux?
Greetings
Greg
Microsoft pays hardware manufacturers to
make drivers for their OS,
I seriously doubt it. They don't need to with
their market share.
Ok, what do you guys live in a shoe or something?
For pete's sake, how can so many people be so
patently clueless and still be able to find food
and
On 18/01/06, Danial Thom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Microsoft pays hardware manufacturers to
make drivers for their OS,
I seriously doubt it. They don't need to with
their market share.
Ok, what do you guys live in a shoe or something?
MS doesn't have to pay vendors, you toad.
Did
On 1/17/06, Philip Hallstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The computer is currently without keyboard, mouse or monitor. I am
adding applications to the computer via ssh while I work. As soon as I
get openbox and tightvnc installed, I'll switch to tightvnc so I can
disconnect without
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matias
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 3:55 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the essential difference
Dick Davies = Sorry for sending you this mail twice, accidently
pressed enter...(shoudn't eat and write e-mails at the same time...)
So what? That's exactly the same for FreeBSD, even it's core apps.
And vendors rush to support MS' new OSes.
There's a very big dump of unmaintained software,
On 18/01/06, Martin Tournoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what? That's exactly the same for FreeBSD, even it's core apps.
And vendors rush to support MS' new OSes.
There's a very big dump of unmaintained software, whenever I want to
play an old classic game like cc, x-com or even system
--- Dick Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18/01/06, Danial Thom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Microsoft pays hardware manufacturers to
make drivers for their OS,
I seriously doubt it. They don't need to
with
their market share.
Ok, what do you guys live in a shoe or
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 18:15 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the essential difference
between FreeBSD and Linux (Fedora for instance)?
I have been following this thread (and similar ones over the past few
weeks) and would like to offer my perspective on the FreeBSD versus
Linux
On 18/01/06, Danial Thom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Dick Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18/01/06, Danial Thom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(actually, no he didn't. your mail clients quoting is insane)
(some guy:)
Microsoft pays hardware manufacturers to make drivers for their OS,
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2006-01-18 16:55, Matias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the essential difference between FreeBSD and Linux (Fedora
for instance)? Where can I find any list of differences?
What/Where are the advantages of FreeBSD vs Linux?
Give
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 14:00:59 +
Dick Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Let me first point out I've seen about 4 different 'unix/windows is
teh gayz0r' threads on completely unrelated mailing lists in the
last 24 hours.
If I sound bored rigid with the whole subject that might be why.]
Can
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 21:15:15 +
Tim Greening-Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 18:15 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the essential difference
between FreeBSD and Linux (Fedora for instance)?
I have been following this thread (and similar ones over the past
What is the essential difference
between FreeBSD and Linux (Fedora for instance)?
Where can I find any list of differences?
What/Where are the advantages of FreeBSD vs Linux?
Greetings
Greg
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the essential difference
between FreeBSD and Linux (Fedora for instance)?
Where can I find any list of differences?
What/Where are the advantages of FreeBSD vs Linux?
Greetings
Greg
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the essential difference
between FreeBSD and Linux (Fedora for instance)?
Where can I find any list of differences?
What/Where are the advantages of FreeBSD vs Linux?
http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/rants/bsd4linux/bsd4linux1.php
Fabian
--
http
hi,
kernel is one of the differences ;)
freebsd uses generic kernel.
and one other important difference is freebsd doest not support my intel
high definition audio card :(
so no sound for years :'( [other distros debian, suse ... support my card.]
instead of yum or apt-get, you have ports in
Linux is just kernel only.
FreeBSD is complete operating system.
FreeBSD and Linux have almost similar performance. There are much
already discussed about it, a google search will give you more info.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the essential difference
between FreeBSD and Linux (Fedora for
instance)?
Where can I find any list of differences?
What/Where are the advantages of FreeBSD vs
Linux?
Greetings
Greg
Whats the difference between a wheelbarrow and a
dumptruck? You
--- FlashWebHost.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Linux is just kernel only.
FreeBSD is complete operating system.
FreeBSD and Linux have almost similar
performance. There are much
already discussed about it, a google search
will give you more info.
Nothing personal, but thats about the
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 18:42, Mehmet Fatih AKBULUT wrote:
but freebsd mostly
used as a server. not much suitable for PC usage.
I really dislike this canard, I have run FreeBSD on a laptop since 3.4
and support for the hardware has generally been adequate, I guess
it depends what you want
i use freebsd at home too :) [as the only o.s. for my pc]
that was 'my opinion'. [dont have sound :'( but still use it :p ]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 10:07:25AM -0800, Danial Thom wrote:
--- FlashWebHost.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Linux is just kernel only.
FreeBSD is complete operating system.
FreeBSD and Linux have almost similar
performance. There are much
already discussed about it, a
] wrote:
What is the essential difference
between FreeBSD and Linux (Fedora for instance)?
Where can I find any list of differences?
What/Where are the advantages of FreeBSD vs Linux?
Greetings
Greg
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
--- Mike Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 10:07:25AM -0800,
Danial Thom wrote:
--- FlashWebHost.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Linux is just kernel only.
FreeBSD is complete operating system.
FreeBSD and Linux have almost similar
On 1/17/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the essential difference
between FreeBSD and Linux (Fedora for instance)?
Where can I find any list of differences?
What/Where are the advantages of FreeBSD vs Linux?
Just google for it, there are plenty of comparisons.
Mike
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 10:38:24AM -0800, Danial Thom wrote:
No, thats ridiculous. Linux has multiple
distributions that use the same kernel. The fact
that freebsd only has one distribution doesn't
make it any more complete.
Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates
FreeBSD in the Server-OS -- No
multimedia possible-corner does not
represents its current state.
Sorry, I dont want to start a FreeBSD vs. Linux Discussion -- just
giving my 2 cents...
greetings
Matze
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
any idea when i'll be able to use my sound card on freebsd ;) ?
[high definition audio :p]
changing the topic ;)
missed listening to music :'( [my speakers will get rot soon, dont even know
if they still work :p]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
it could be worse, you could be using OpenBSD and then you'd never
even have a chance at getting a proprietary driver to work. ;) In the meantime
why don't you spend $5 and get a cheap sound card to give you something to do
while you wait?:)
OpenBSD vs. FreeBSD vs. Linux opens up a new old can
Have similar performance hah
Linux is just kernel only.
FreeBSD is complete operating system.
FreeBSD and Linux have almost similar performance. There are much
already discussed about it, a google search will give you more info.
___
On Jan 17, 2006, at 11:38 AM, Danial Thom wrote:
No, thats ridiculous. Linux has multiple
distributions that use the same kernel. The fact
that freebsd only has one distribution doesn't
make it any more complete.
Actually it is spot on. Linux is a kernel. The various
distributions add
On Jan 17, 2006, at 12:32 PM, Mehmet Fatih AKBULUT wrote:
any idea when i'll be able to use my sound card on freebsd ;) ?
[high definition audio :p]
changing the topic ;)
missed listening to music :'( [my speakers will get rot soon, dont
even know
if they still work :p]
Just get a
something to do
while you wait?:)
OpenBSD vs. FreeBSD vs. Linux opens up a new old can of worms... or is that
an new can of old worms?
Mike
Hi,
My experience with FreeBSD on the laptop has been very good. And even
OpenBSD isn't too bad for a laptop these days. Their generic kernel
picks up
A FreeBSD vs Linux anecdote:
I've read several articles over the years talking about how Linux can
breathe new life into old computers. After the last couple of weeks, I
don't buy it.
After combining the hardware from 2 old computers (circa 1996 and
1998 -- anyone remember ISA cards, serial
The computer is currently without keyboard, mouse or monitor. I am
adding applications to the computer via ssh while I work. As soon as I
get openbox and tightvnc installed, I'll switch to tightvnc so I can
disconnect without disrupting jobs. (Hmm, I wonder if I'll have to add
a mouse or
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:57:04 -0700
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 17, 2006, at 11:38 AM, Danial Thom wrote:
No, thats ridiculous. Linux has multiple
distributions that use the same kernel. The fact
that freebsd only has one distribution doesn't
make it any
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:32:30 -0800 (PST)
Philip Hallstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The computer is currently without keyboard, mouse or monitor. I am
adding applications to the computer via ssh while I work. As soon
as I get openbox and tightvnc installed, I'll switch to tightvnc so
I
Using sound on a Unix box will not give you the same support for that then
on a windows box if the sound card problem is with all major os'es then i
would think your sound card is ready to be changed out i have a audigy Z2
in my unix box and i have had no errors so fare freebsd doesnt support
high
Just get a different sound card. There are lotsof
inexpensive sounds cards that are probably supported by
FreeBSD for just a few (10-30) $
Btw, this problem happens with Windows, Mac OS X, etc as
well. I have been trying to put an extra USB/Firewire card
in my G5, and they work, but
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 05:00:26PM -0500, Tamouh H. wrote:
Just get a different sound card. There are lotsof
inexpensive sounds cards that are probably supported by
FreeBSD for just a few (10-30) $
Oh come on, I've been working with all Linux, FreeBSD and Windows.
Getting a
On 17/01/06, David Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone has an unsupported sound card with a Linux example. All the
tough details about the hardware are spelled out in the Linux driver.
Plenty of FreeBSD drivers have been ported to Linux and vice versa.
Danger Will Robinson! The GPL can
Andrew L. Gould wrote:
A FreeBSD vs Linux anecdote:
I've read several articles over the years talking about how Linux can
breathe new life into old computers. After the last couple of weeks, I
don't buy it.
After combining the hardware from 2 old computers (circa 1996 and
1998 -- anyone
Tamouh H. wrote:
Just get a different sound card. There are lotsof
inexpensive sounds cards that are probably supported by
FreeBSD for just a few (10-30) $
Btw, this problem happens with Windows, Mac OS X, etc as
well. I have been trying to put an extra USB/Firewire card
in my G5, and they
David Kelly wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 05:00:26PM -0500, Tamouh H. wrote:
Just get a different sound card. There are lotsof
inexpensive sounds cards that are probably supported by
FreeBSD for just a few (10-30) $
Oh come on, I've been working with all Linux, FreeBSD and
That or the user(s). Microsoft doesn't write any sound card drivers, they
make
manufacturers do it then pay and beg to be included on the master
distribution CD/DVD.
For a device to work in FreeBSD someone who wants it bad enough to do the
work has to have the skills and want it bad enough to do
On Jan 17, 2006, at 6:16 PM, Tamouh H. wrote:
Still Microsoft has the upper hand! How about this for an idea,
sponsored
drivers ? Why not allow such service that if an organization or
individual
wishes to have a driver written they can sponsor a FreeBSD
developer to do
it?
How is that
On Jan 17, 2006, at 4:31 PM, Dick Davies wrote:
On 17/01/06, David Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone has an unsupported sound card with a Linux example. All the
tough details about the hardware are spelled out in the Linux driver.
Plenty of FreeBSD drivers have been ported to Linux and
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 21:32:30 +0200
Mehmet Fatih AKBULUT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
any idea when i'll be able to use my sound card on freebsd ;) ?
[high definition audio :p]
changing the topic ;)
missed listening to music :'( [my speakers will get rot soon, dont
even know if they still work
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:00:26 -0500
Tamouh H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just get a different sound card. There are lotsof
inexpensive sounds cards that are probably supported by
FreeBSD for just a few (10-30) $
Btw, this problem happens with Windows, Mac OS X, etc as
well. I have
1 - 100 of 231 matches
Mail list logo
