Re: latest git ports upgrade

On Nov 29, 2012 2:27 PM, "Artifex Maximus" wrote: > BTW, why system does not know user git_daemon when git_daemon was in > passwd and master.passwd? I am using portmaster to upgrade my > installed ports. I have had this exact issue when installing postgresql via portmaster. When it fails (and it

Re: latest git ports upgrade

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Artifex Maximus wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Mark Felder wrote: >> On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:04:12 +0100 >> Artifex Maximus wrote: >> >>> On next upgrade got the first error so I am in loop. Any idea what to do? >> >> Please check /usr/ports/UPDATING wh

Re: latest git ports upgrade

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Mark Felder wrote: > On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:04:12 +0100 > Artifex Maximus wrote: > >> On next upgrade got the first error so I am in loop. Any idea what to do? > > Please check /usr/ports/UPDATING which has a note in there about git. Thanks for your answer. The U

Re: latest git ports upgrade

On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:04:12 +0100 Artifex Maximus wrote: > On next upgrade got the first error so I am in loop. Any idea what to do? Please check /usr/ports/UPDATING which has a note in there about git. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list h

latest git ports upgrade

Hello! On upgrade I got the following error with git port: ===> Creating users and/or groups. Using existing group `git_daemon'. Creating user `git_daemon' with uid `964'. pw: user 'git_daemon' already exists *** Error code 74 Look for git_daemon user: # id git_daemon id: git_daemon: no such us

Re: Ports: How do dependent ports upgrade when dependency shared lib version is bumped?

Yuri writes: > I recently updates the system. libatkmm-1.6.so.1 got bumped to > libatkmm-1.6.so.2, now inkscape fails: > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libatkmm-1.6.so.1" not found, > required by "inkscape" > > What is the right behavior in such situation? Should all depending > packages be

Re: Ports: How do dependent ports upgrade when dependency shared lib version is bumped?

On Sat Dec 11 10, Yuri wrote: > I recently updates the system. libatkmm-1.6.so.1 got bumped to > libatkmm-1.6.so.2, now inkscape fails: > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libatkmm-1.6.so.1" not found, > required by "inkscape" > > What is the right behavior in such situation? Should all depen

Ports: How do dependent ports upgrade when dependency shared lib version is bumped?

I recently updates the system. libatkmm-1.6.so.1 got bumped to libatkmm-1.6.so.2, now inkscape fails: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libatkmm-1.6.so.1" not found, required by "inkscape" What is the right behavior in such situation? Should all depending packages be also automatically bump

Re: linux compatibility ports upgrade

On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:34:44 -0400 Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: > I see, can you tell me which are FC4 ports?? thanks!! Please, reread my previous email. I wrote _all_ linux ports. > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:15:42 -0400 Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: > > >

Re: linux compatibility ports upgrade

I see, can you tell me which are FC4 ports?? thanks!! TFC On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:15:42 -0400 Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: > > > Thank you, Boris. This is my linux ports,linux-f8-atk-1.20.0_1 > Accessibility > > Toolkit, Linux/i386 binary (Linux Fed

Re: linux compatibility ports upgrade

On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:15:42 -0400 Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: > Thank you, Boris. This is my linux ports,linux-f8-atk-1.20.0_1 Accessibility > Toolkit, Linux/i386 binary (Linux Fedora 8) > linux-f8-cairo-1.4.14_1 Vector graphics library Cairo (Linux Fedora 8) > linux-f8-curl-7.18.2_1 The command line too

Re: linux compatibility ports upgrade

It's funny, sometimes I think portmaster knows that it should upgrade linux-f8* ports and not linux-* ports but sometimes doesn't. I don't know why... TFC On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: > Thank you, Boris. This is my linux ports,linux-f8-atk-1.20.0_1 > Accessibility Toolk

Re: linux compatibility ports upgrade

Thank you, Boris. This is my linux ports,linux-f8-atk-1.20.0_1 Accessibility Toolkit, Linux/i386 binary (Linux Fedora 8) linux-f8-cairo-1.4.14_1 Vector graphics library Cairo (Linux Fedora 8) linux-f8-curl-7.18.2_1 The command line tool for transferring files with URL synta linux-f8-expat-2.0.1_1 L

Re: linux compatibility ports upgrade

On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 13:15:21 -0400 Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: > Hi, Just use portmaster to upgrade ports and found out a lot of linux-* > ports are renewed. But strange to see that upgrading was interrupted by > ports conflicts, such as linux-f8-tiff and linux-tiff. Yes, those ports install files with

linux compatibility ports upgrade

Hi, Just use portmaster to upgrade ports and found out a lot of linux-* ports are renewed. But strange to see that upgrading was interrupted by ports conflicts, such as linux-f8-tiff and linux-tiff. What I have are a whole bunch of f8 stuff, I dont understand why portmaster choose to upgrade port

firefox3 crashes after ports upgrade

Yesterday I updated ports. And now firefox3 crashes right after start. Windows firefox3 under wine also has some graphics defects, many icons are jammed. Some icons in kde4 applets are oversized. Something isn't quite right. Anyone has similar problems? Yuri __

Re: Performing installed ports upgrade / leaving some software intact

On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 07:17:27AM +0100, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > > Hello, > > >> 1/ backing up the hacked [mailman] files and restoring them later (but I > >> will > >> overwrite the newer files with older ones perhaps breaking something). > >> 2/ making them read only (but the end result will

Re: Performing installed ports upgrade / leaving some software intact

Hello, >> 1/ backing up the hacked [mailman] files and restoring them later (but I >> will >> overwrite the newer files with older ones perhaps breaking something). >> 2/ making them read only (but the end result will be the same and >> upgrading as root I will overwrite them anyway). > > Keep in

Re: Performing installed ports upgrade / leaving some software intact

On Jan 14, 2009, at 12:03 PM, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: 1/ backing up the hacked [mailman] files and restoring them later (but I will overwrite the newer files with older ones perhaps breaking something). 2/ making them read only (but the end result will be the same and upgrading as root I will

Re: Performing installed ports upgrade / leaving some software intact

the end result will be the same and > upgrading as root I will overwrite them anyway). 'chflags schg,sunlnk ' (as root) will do the trick. Even root cannot overwrite these without removing the flags. > And that would be it. My wisdom ends here. Is there any option to > survive

Re: Performing installed ports upgrade / leaving some software intact

with older ones perhaps breaking something). > 2/ making them read only (but the end result will be the same and > upgrading as root I will overwrite them anyway). > > And that would be it. My wisdom ends here. Is there any option to > survive the ports upgrade? :) > > If not,

Performing installed ports upgrade / leaving some software intact

be the same and upgrading as root I will overwrite them anyway). And that would be it. My wisdom ends here. Is there any option to survive the ports upgrade? :) If not, I guess I will just have to hack Mailman files again after the upgrade... -- Zbigniew Szalbot www.slowo.pl

Re: Ports upgrade within Jail

drivers and etc. Regards, Ivailo Tanusheff Deputy Head of IT Department ProCredit Bank (Bulgaria) AD Druckbar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07.08.2008 13:15 To freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc Subject Ports upgrade within Jail Hello List, i have a jail hosted on

Ports upgrade within Jail

> Will i encounter problems if i just upgrade my ports using portsnap and > portmaster? or will those tools be aware of the version my base system > is and only use ports that are made for this version? The components of your jail are totally seperate from the host. You can use portsnap, or cvsup,

Ports upgrade within Jail

Hello List, i have a jail hosted on a 6-2 RELEASE machine i don't have access to. As i don't have access, i can't upgrade the base system. But i would like to keep the ports i use up to date. Will i encounter problems if i just upgrade my ports using portsnap and portmaster? or will those too

Re: Samba doesn't start after a ports upgrade

For extra info at start time I always use sh -x /sur/local/etc/rc.d/foo start which will give you some nice realtime debugging. -J On 5/13/08 1:20 AM, "Reinhold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > I have a samba server here at work. Last night I did a ports upgra

Re: Samba doesn't start after a ports upgrade

On Tue, May 13, 2008 10:55, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> The problem was cups. >> > > i don't have cups installed and have samba running. check samba config - > it should not be like this > I just checked make config and I have cups selected, but I'm pretty sure it has always been selected. I'll dese

Re: Samba doesn't start after a ports upgrade

i I have a samba server here at work. Last night I did a ports upgrade and since then samba fails to start. It just hangs at the rc script. # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba start Removing stale Samba tdb files: done Starting nmbd. Starting smbd. # ps auxwww |grep smb root 66854 0.0 0.7

Re: Samba doesn't start after a ports upgrade

Woot, its back up. The problem was cups. I never used cups before, but for some reason now I have to start cups up so that samba can work. Regards Reinhold On Tue, May 13, 2008 09:20, Reinhold wrote: > Hi > > > I have a samba server here at work. Last night I did a ports upgrade

Samba doesn't start after a ports upgrade

Hi I have a samba server here at work. Last night I did a ports upgrade and since then samba fails to start. It just hangs at the rc script. # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba start Removing stale Samba tdb files: done Starting nmbd. Starting smbd. # ps auxwww |grep smb root 66854 0.0 0.7

Re: automate ports upgrade (portmanager -u -l)

On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 1:53 PM, RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> How to do unattended ports upgrade? I am using FreeBSD 7.0 and >> portmanager ask me strange questions[0] (about compile-time options) > > It's not actually portmanager, it's the ports-syste

Re: automate ports upgrade (portmanager -u -l)

On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Simon Jolle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi FreeBSD users > > How to do unattended ports upgrade? I am using FreeBSD 7.0 and > portmanager ask me strange questions[0] (about compile-time options) Unattended? Even on Windows, I doubt they do

Re: automate ports upgrade (portmanager -u -l)

On Thu, 8 May 2008 13:10:23 +0200 "Simon Jolle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi FreeBSD users > > How to do unattended ports upgrade? I am using FreeBSD 7.0 and > portmanager ask me strange questions[0] (about compile-time options) It's not actually portmana

automate ports upgrade (portmanager -u -l)

Hi FreeBSD users How to do unattended ports upgrade? I am using FreeBSD 7.0 and portmanager ask me strange questions[0] (about compile-time options) cheers Simon [0] http://img384.imageshack.us/img384/8657/portmanageruloptionsaw9.png -- XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Increase in the number of ports: upgrade xorg to 7.2...

On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 05:07:25PM -0400, Gerard wrote: On June 08, 2007 at 03:48PM Bill Moran wrote: [snip] > It's not an assumption, its OPTIMISM! That reminds me of an optimist who fell off of a fifty story building. As he passed each floor on the way down, he yelled, "So, so far!" Serious

Re: Increase in the number of ports: upgrade xorg to 7.2...

On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:30:01PM -0400, Gerard wrote: > On June 08, 2007 at 05:12PM Kris Kennaway wrote: > > [snip] > > > FYI, if you'd used an upgrade tool like portupgrade it would have been > > seamless because portupgrade keeps the old library version around for > > precisely this reason. >

Re[2]: Increase in the number of ports: upgrade xorg to 7.2...

On June 08, 2007 at 05:12PM Kris Kennaway wrote: [snip] > FYI, if you'd used an upgrade tool like portupgrade it would have been > seamless because portupgrade keeps the old library version around for > precisely this reason. Actually, I ended up using portmanager with the '-p' flag to force upd

Re: Increase in the number of ports: upgrade xorg to 7.2...

On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 05:07:25PM -0400, Gerard wrote: > On June 08, 2007 at 03:48PM Bill Moran wrote: > > [snip] > > > It's not an assumption, its OPTIMISM! > > That reminds me of an optimist who fell off of a fifty story building. > As he passed each floor on the way down, he yelled, "So, so

Re[4]: Increase in the number of ports: upgrade xorg to 7.2...

On June 08, 2007 at 03:48PM Bill Moran wrote: [snip] > It's not an assumption, its OPTIMISM! That reminds me of an optimist who fell off of a fifty story building. As he passed each floor on the way down, he yelled, "So, so far!" Seriously, I hope you are right. I believe it was 'gettext' that

Re: Re[2]: Increase in the number of ports: upgrade xorg to 7.2...

In response to Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 03:34:38PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > > > I am not totally convinced. If one small package is updated that is > > > depended on by 10 other package that in turn are depended on by a like > > > number of other packages, wha

Re: Re[2]: Increase in the number of ports: upgrade xorg to 7.2...

On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 03:34:38PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > > I am not totally convinced. If one small package is updated that is > > depended on by 10 other package that in turn are depended on by a like > > number of other packages, what has been really gained by breaking > > everything into sm

Re: Re[2]: Increase in the number of ports: upgrade xorg to 7.2...

In response to Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On June 08, 2007 at 02:57PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > xorg is now 180-230 some-odd tiny packages (ports) > > instead of the old -clients, -server, -libraries blobs. > > > > It seems to work okay, and minor updates are far less > > strenuous. I g

Re[2]: Increase in the number of ports: upgrade xorg to 7.2...

On June 08, 2007 at 02:57PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > xorg is now 180-230 some-odd tiny packages (ports) > instead of the old -clients, -server, -libraries blobs. > > It seems to work okay, and minor updates are far less > strenuous. I give it five years to either prove itself or > all the dev

Re: Increase in the number of ports: upgrade xorg to 7.2...

On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 01:57:40PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 08/06/07, Amarendra Godbole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > . . . > >Initially I had about 230 packages installed, and after the upgrade > >the number has gone up to 450! Lot of these seem to be X related > >packages. > > > >Does

Re: Increase in the number of ports: upgrade xorg to 7.2...

On 08/06/07, Amarendra Godbole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: . . . Initially I had about 230 packages installed, and after the upgrade the number has gone up to 450! Lot of these seem to be X related packages. Does xorg 7.2 have more dependencies, and hence so many ports were installed? xorg is n

Increase in the number of ports: upgrade xorg to 7.2...

Amarendra Godbole writes: > Does xorg 7.2 have more dependencies, and hence so many ports > were installed? No, but a _lot_ of stuff which used to be bundled is now its own port. An additional 225+ packages sounds about right. Robert Huff _

Re: Increase in the number of ports: upgrade xorg to 7.2...

In response to "Amarendra Godbole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > I recently upgraded to xorg 7.2 by doing a complete portupgrade. I run > FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE, with the default kernel, and default settings. > Initially I had about 230 packages installed, and after the upgrade > the number has gon

Increase in the number of ports: upgrade xorg to 7.2...

Hi, I recently upgraded to xorg 7.2 by doing a complete portupgrade. I run FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE, with the default kernel, and default settings. Initially I had about 230 packages installed, and after the upgrade the number has gone up to 450! Lot of these seem to be X related packages. Does xorg

Re: Upgrade FreeBSD 6.1 to 6.2 - ports upgrade

On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 16:50:31 +0300 Dominik Zalewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear All, > > I'm planning to upgrade my FreeBSD 6.1 box to 6.2. Should I remove all > installed ports and rebuild them under 6.2 ? > > Thanks in advance, > > > Dominik > Hey Dominik. Imagine you don't plan an

Re: Upgrade FreeBSD 6.1 to 6.2 - ports upgrade

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Derek Ragona wrote: > At 08:50 AM 6/7/2007, Dominik Zalewski wrote: >> Dear All, >> >> I'm planning to upgrade my FreeBSD 6.1 box to 6.2. Should I remove all >> installed ports and rebuild them under 6.2 ? >> >> Thanks in advance, > > You don't need

Re: Upgrade FreeBSD 6.1 to 6.2 - ports upgrade

At 08:50 AM 6/7/2007, Dominik Zalewski wrote: Dear All, I'm planning to upgrade my FreeBSD 6.1 box to 6.2. Should I remove all installed ports and rebuild them under 6.2 ? Thanks in advance, You don't need to remove them. But you should run portmanager or portupgrade to rebuild them all aft

Upgrade FreeBSD 6.1 to 6.2 - ports upgrade

Dear All, I'm planning to upgrade my FreeBSD 6.1 box to 6.2. Should I remove all installed ports and rebuild them under 6.2 ? Thanks in advance, Dominik ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd

Re: ports upgrade question

On 6/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm a newbie running 6.1 stable and I have what may be several simple questions: What exactly is happening when I run "make index && make readmes" after I upgrade my ports tree? Why aren't the indexes and readmes made when we run cvsup

Re: ports upgrade question

On 6/10/06, Nikolas Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm a newbie running 6.1 stable and I have what may be several simple questions: What exactly is happening when I run "make index && make readmes" after I upgrade my ports tree? Why

Re: ports upgrade question

On 6/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm a newbie running 6.1 stable and I have what may be several simple questions: What exactly is happening when I run "make index && make readmes" after I upgrade my ports tree? Why aren't the indexes and readmes made when we run cvsup po

ports upgrade question

I'm a newbie running 6.1 stable and I have what may be several simple questions: What exactly is happening when I run "make index && make readmes" after I upgrade my ports tree? Why aren't the indexes and readmes made when we run cvsup ports-supfile? Finally, why does it take so long to make wha

Re: abiword broken after ports upgrade

On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 07:40:56PM -0400, Peter wrote: > > --- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 07:30:20PM -0400, Peter wrote: > > > A couple of days ago I upgraded my ports on my 5.4-STABLE system. > > > Afterwords Abiword cannot start: > > > > > > /libexe

Re: abiword broken after ports upgrade

--- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 07:30:20PM -0400, Peter wrote: > > A couple of days ago I upgraded my ports on my 5.4-STABLE system. > > Afterwords Abiword cannot start: > > > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libgsf-1.so.113" not found, > > required

Re: abiword broken after ports upgrade

On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 07:30:20PM -0400, Peter wrote: > A couple of days ago I upgraded my ports on my 5.4-STABLE system. > Afterwords Abiword cannot start: > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libgsf-1.so.113" not found, > required by "libwv-1.2.so.1" > > Any ideas? Finish updating your p

abiword broken after ports upgrade

A couple of days ago I upgraded my ports on my 5.4-STABLE system. Afterwords Abiword cannot start: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libgsf-1.so.113" not found, required by "libwv-1.2.so.1" Any ideas? __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! M

RE: Ports upgrade policy

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 08:35:46 -0600, "Mike Loiterman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Erik Trulsson wrote: [snip] > >>> Is it advisable to sync my source to RELEASE, but to CURRENT for > >>> ports? Typically, I upgade my ports a few days after they get > >>> updated so I'm alw

Re: Ports upgrade policy

On 3/14/06, Mike Loiterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Erik Trulsson wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 04:18:13AM -0400, Duane Whitty wrote: > >> Mike Loiterman wrote: > >>> Is it advisable to sync my source to RELEASE, but to CURRENT for > >>> ports? Typically, I upgad

RE: Ports upgrade policy

Erik Trulsson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 04:18:13AM -0400, Duane Whitty wrote: >> Mike Loiterman wrote: >>> This is my supfile: >>> >>> *default host=cvsup1.FreeBSD.org >>> *default base=/usr >>> *default prefix=/usr >>> *default release=cvs >>> *default tag=R

Re: Ports upgrade policy

On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 04:18:13AM -0400, Duane Whitty wrote: > Mike Loiterman wrote: > >This is my supfile: > > > >*default host=cvsup1.FreeBSD.org > >*default base=/usr > >*default prefix=/usr > >*default release=cvs > >*default tag=RELENG_6_0 > >*default delete use-rel-suffix > > > >src-al

Re: Ports upgrade policy

Mike Loiterman wrote: This is my supfile: *default host=cvsup1.FreeBSD.org *default base=/usr *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs *default tag=RELENG_6_0 *default delete use-rel-suffix src-all *default tag=. ports-all doc-all I have been using it like this for years, obviously cha

Ports upgrade policy

This is my supfile: *default host=cvsup1.FreeBSD.org *default base=/usr *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs *default tag=RELENG_6_0 *default delete use-rel-suffix src-all *default tag=. ports-all doc-all I have been using it like this for years, obviously changing to the latest rele

Re: unattended ports upgrade possible?

On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 03:20:07PM -0500, Peter wrote: > Is there any way to fully automate the upgrade of all installed ports? > Typically ncurses screens prompt for compile options. Is there any way to > instruct portupgrade to use default compile values? Add a `BATCH=yes' to /etc/make.conf. -

unattended ports upgrade possible?

Is there any way to fully automate the upgrade of all installed ports? Typically ncurses screens prompt for compile options. Is there any way to instruct portupgrade to use default compile values? -- Peter

Re: Newbie: Ports upgrade, CVSup, and disk space problems

On Wednesday 07 December 2005 14:43, Charles Haynes wrote: > Hi, all. I'm new to FreeBSD. > > I'm setting up a machine to act as a webserver using: > > FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p12-jc2 (jail18) #0 > > Tonight I added the package: > > cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_2 > > and ran: > > # cvsup -g -L 2 /root/cvs-

Newbie: Ports upgrade, CVSup, and disk space problems

Hi, all. I'm new to FreeBSD. I'm setting up a machine to act as a webserver using: FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p12-jc2 (jail18) #0 Tonight I added the package: cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_2 and ran: # cvsup -g -L 2 /root/cvs-supfile After it ran (which took over an hour), I realized I used the "cv

Re: system wide ports upgrade

On Saturday 20 November 2004 04:51, Steel City Phantom wrote: > i remember there being a program out there that will go through all > my installed apps and upgrade them with the latest versions in the > ports collection, what was it called again? > > thanks portupgrade is the program. it is found

Re: system wide ports upgrade

Steel City Phantom wrote: i remember there being a program out there that will go through all my installed apps and upgrade them with the latest versions in the ports collection, what was it called again? thanks portupgrade, in the sysutils directory. -BB

system wide ports upgrade

i remember there being a program out there that will go through all my installed apps and upgrade them with the latest versions in the ports collection, what was it called again? thanks ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma

ports upgrade question 4.10 stable

I am a new FreeBSD user coming from Debian Linux. I think I have finally got the upgrading process done right. I just need to know if I am missing anything or have something configured wrong. I have gotten bits and pieces from this forum, FreeBSD handbook and the examples that came with this insta

Re: ports upgrade question

On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 02:25:18PM +0300, alexander botov wrote: > I'm sure that this is a trivial question to ask . I'm considering source and > ports tree upgarde from 5.2_REL to 5.2.1_REL . I've never did cvs before > (usually i back up , format + binary install and restore ) . I've read the

ports upgrade question

Hi to everyone ! I'm sure that this is a trivial question to ask . I'm considering source and ports tree upgarde from 5.2_REL to 5.2.1_REL . I've never did cvs before (usually i back up , format + binary install and restore ) . I've read the article from the handbook and everything is pretty muc

Re: ports upgrade error?

Thank you Tim, Thank you Kent, This fixed the problem. On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 07:14:28 -0700, Kent Stewart wrote > > You only need the one with the *default on it. It is complaining > about the first one. > > Kent > > > *default base=/usr > > *default prefix=/usr > > *default release=cvs tag=. >

Re: ports upgrade error?

On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 15:11, Marwan Sultan wrote: > Hello everyone, > PS: This command will run as a background proccess? if i disconnect from > internet and I connect again later (Dialup) it will resume the updating? I think it will time out and exit the process eventually, so you would have

Re: ports upgrade error?

On Friday 16 April 2004 08:11 am, Marwan Sultan wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Im on FreeBSD 5.1-Release, CVsup, portupgrade are installed. > I want to upgrade my ports tree, so I did whats on the Handbook. > I'v copied and edit the file - ports-supfile. > I ran the command cvsup -g -

ports upgrade error?

Hello everyone, Im on FreeBSD 5.1-Release, CVsup, portupgrade are installed. I want to upgrade my ports tree, so I did whats on the Handbook. I'v copied and edit the file - ports-supfile. I ran the command cvsup -g -L 2 /path/to/ports-supfile And it gave me the following error

Re: ports upgrade w/out internet connection

On Monday 22 September 2003 08:44 am, Brian Henning wrote: > Greetings: > Can i perform a ports upgrade to a computer that has no internet > connection by ftping the file /pub/FreeBSD/ports/ports/ports.tar.gz > and replacing the /usr/ports/ directory > with the uncompressed versi

ports upgrade w/out internet connection

Greetings: Can i perform a ports upgrade to a computer that has no internet connection by ftping the file /pub/FreeBSD/ports/ports/ports.tar.gz and replacing the /usr/ports/ directory with the uncompressed version of this file? please let me know your opinion to solve my problem. thanks, brian

Strange error during ports upgrade

After running cvsup and making the index file I'll get the following warnings/errors heaven# make index Generating INDEX - please wait..zh-openoffice-CN-1.0.3_2: "/usr/ports/devel/jakarta-ant" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete zh-openoffice-TW-1.0.3_2: "/usr/ports/devel/jakarta-ant" non-e

Re: ports upgrade

Thanks for your answers! > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message -- Iulian Dumbrava ROMTELECOM. O&M Network. IN Management Center To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in

Re: ports upgrade

On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 18:11:11 +0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello! If I cvsup'd ports what will I need in order to make my new ports to work? I mean I should make a buildworld? Thanks! You will often be able to build most or all of your new ports without building the world, because cvsup-in

Re: ports upgrade

On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 18:11:11 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello! > If I cvsup'd ports what will I need in order to make my new ports to work? I mean I >should make a buildworld? no you wont just installs portupgrade (ports/sysutils/portupgrade), and then run portupgrade -R your_port_nam

ports upgrade

Hello! If I cvsup'd ports what will I need in order to make my new ports to work? I mean I should make a buildworld? Thanks! -- Iulian ROMTELECOM. O&M Network. IN Management Center To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message

ports upgrade?

First I am sorry if here is not the right place to ask it. I am trying to update a port but I am having a problem. I am in fact having problems while patch'ing my old port. Here is what I have done. #cp -r category/ports category/ports.old #cd category/ports #cd /usr/ports/category #diff -ruN