E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Gerard wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:23:36 -0500
"E. J. Cerejo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
Can portmanager work in conjection with portupgrade?
Yes, I use it all the ti
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Gerard wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:23:36 -0500
"E. J. Cerejo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
Can portmanager work in conjection with portupgrade?
Yes, I use it all the time.
Why has the p
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:22:05 -0500
"E. J. Cerejo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> This what happens when running portmanager:
>
> ecerejo# portmanager -s
> MGrStrlen error: NULL marker not found in string
> Assertion failed: (0), function MGrStrlen, file MGrStrlen.c, line 54.
> Abort (core d
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Gerard wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:23:36 -0500
"E. J. Cerejo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
Can portmanager work in conjection with portupgrade?
Yes, I use it all the time.
Why has the ports tree be up to date?
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ sorry, I couldn't entirely recover the format; need a newline once in
a while! ]
- Original Message -
From: Chris Hill
Date: Sunday, February 10, 2008 6:51 pm
Subject: Re: libicui18n.so.36 not found, required by "evolution&
- Original Message -From: Chris Hill Date: Sunday, February 10, 2008
6:51 pmSubject: Re: libicui18n.so.36 not found, required by "evolution"To: "E.
J. Cerejo" Cc: Dominic Fandrey , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> On Sun, 10 Feb
2008, E. J. Cerejo wrote:> > &
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Chris Whitehouse wrote:
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Gerard wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:18:45 +
Chris Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
portmanager -s piped to a file might tell you what's missing
Just running:
portmanager -u -l -p -y
should correc
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Gerard wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:23:36 -0500
"E. J. Cerejo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
Can portmanager work in conjection with portupgrade?
Yes, I use it all the time.
Why has the ports tre
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Gerard wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:23:36 -0500
"E. J. Cerejo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
Can portmanager work in conjection with portupgrade?
Yes, I use it all the time.
Why has the ports tree be up to date?
What conceiv
Chris Whitehouse wrote:
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Gerard wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:18:45 +
Chris Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
portmanager -s piped to a file might tell you what's missing
Just running:
portmanager -u -l -p -y
should correct the problem as well
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 20:37:54 +
Chris Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> portmanager -s only lists what needs to be done, it doesn't change
> anything. It shows which packages are up to date, which are out of
> date, which are current but have been built with out of date
> depende
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Gerard wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:18:45 +
Chris Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
portmanager -s piped to a file might tell you what's missing
Just running:
portmanager -u -l -p -y
should correct the problem as well. Make sure the ports tre
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Gerard wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:23:36 -0500
"E. J. Cerejo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
Can portmanager work in conjection with portupgrade?
Yes, I use it all the time.
Why has the ports tree be up to date?
What conceivable reason would you h
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:47:10 -0500
"E. J. Cerejo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> My system was updated yesterday and I'm trying to resolve the issues
> that arose from the updating. I can't update my system everyday I
> just don't have time for it.
Obviously, it was not fully or correctly
Gerard wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:23:36 -0500
"E. J. Cerejo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
Can portmanager work in conjection with portupgrade?
Yes, I use it all the time.
Why has the ports tree be up to date?
What conceivable reason would you have for using an o
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:23:36 -0500
"E. J. Cerejo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Can portmanager work in conjection with portupgrade?
Yes, I use it all the time.
> Why has the ports tree be up to date?
What conceivable reason would you have for using an outdated ports tree?
> Will port
Gerard wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:18:45 +
Chris Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
portmanager -s piped to a file might tell you what's missing
Just running:
portmanager -u -l -p -y
should correct the problem as well. Make sure the ports tree is up to
date
Gerard wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:18:45 +
Chris Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
portmanager -s piped to a file might tell you what's missing
Just running:
portmanager -u -l -p -y
should correct the problem as well. Make sure the ports tree is up to
date
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:18:45 +
Chris Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> portmanager -s piped to a file might tell you what's missing
Just running:
portmanager -u -l -p -y
should correct the problem as well. Make sure the ports tree is up to
date prior to running that co
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
On Saturday 09 February 2008 13:02:58 Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Running FBSD 6.3 and after updating the ports where icu was one of the
ports to be updated I'm getting the libexec/ld-elf.
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
On Saturday 09 February 2008 13:02:58 Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Running FBSD 6.3 and after updating the ports where icu was one of the
ports to be updated I'm getting the libexec/ld-elf.
On Saturday 09 February 2008 13:02:58 Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> Matthew Seaman wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > E. J. Cerejo wrote:
> >> Running FBSD 6.3 and after updating the ports where icu was one of the
> >> ports to be updated I'm getting the libexec/ld-el
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
> On Saturday 09 February 2008 12:29:16 Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> E. J. Cerejo wrote:
>>> Running FBSD 6.3 and after updating the ports where icu was one of the
>>> ports to be updated I'm getting the libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object
>>> "libicui18n.so.36" not found, required b
Matthew Seaman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Running FBSD 6.3 and after updating the ports where icu was one of the
ports to be updated I'm getting the libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object
"libicui18n.so.36" not found, required by "evolution" error, I
On Saturday 09 February 2008 12:29:16 Matthew Seaman wrote:
> E. J. Cerejo wrote:
> > Running FBSD 6.3 and after updating the ports where icu was one of the
> > ports to be updated I'm getting the libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object
> > "libicui18n.so.36" not found, required by "evolution" error, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
> Running FBSD 6.3 and after updating the ports where icu was one of the
> ports to be updated I'm getting the libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object
> "libicui18n.so.36" not found, required by "evolution" error, I can see
> that the
On Feb 9, 2008 12:17 PM, E. J. Cerejo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Running FBSD 6.3 and after updating the ports where icu was one of the
> ports to be updated I'm getting the libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object
> "libicui18n.so.36" not found, required by "evolution" error, I can see
> that the new
Quoting "E. J. Cerejo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Running FBSD 6.3 and after updating the ports where icu was one of the
ports to be updated I'm getting the libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object
"libicui18n.so.36" not found, required by "evolution" error, I can see
that the new version of icu installed "
28 matches
Mail list logo
