On 07/30/2011 11:37 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message4e345767.5070...@earthlink.net, Stephen Clark writes:
Hello List,
Didn't see this show up in the mailing list so I am resending.
Could someone enlighten me as to when FreeBSD 6.3 does UDP packet reassembly?
I am having a problem
Hello List,
Didn't see this show up in the mailing list so I am resending.
Could someone enlighten me as to when FreeBSD 6.3 does UDP packet reassembly?
I am having a problem where I am getting a fragmented udp packet (2 pieces)
everthing is
fine if I get the first frag first. but if the
Hello List,
Could someone enlighten me as to when FreeBSD 6.3 does UDP packet
reassembly?
I am having a problem where I am getting a fragmented udp packet (2
pieces) everthing is
fine if I get the first frag first. but if the second frag comes first
then both fragments get dropped.
I am
On 03/26/2011 12:00 PM, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:28:53PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Hi,
Hi.
If one has multiple entries in the SPD some representing more specific
network addresses not to be encrypted and sent over an
ipsec tunnel vs more general
Hi,
If one has multiple entries in the SPD some representing more specific
network addresses not to be encrypted and sent over an
ipsec tunnel vs more general networks that would be encrypted would this
work?
In other words say I have a x.x.0.0/16 that should encrypted but in that
On 11/01/2010 01:42 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, November 01, 2010 1:30:35 pm Stephen Clark wrote:
On 11/01/2010 09:54 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, November 01, 2010 8:38:15 am Stephen Clark wrote:
On 10/29/2010 05:20 PM, John Baldwin wrote
On 10/29/2010 05:20 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, October 29, 2010 4:20:24 pm Stephen Clark wrote:
rr232x: RocketRAID 232x controller driver v1.02 (Jan 16 2008 04:16:21)
hptrr: HPT RocketRAID controller driver v1.1 (Jan 16 2008 04:16:19)
big snip
lo0: bpf attached
On 11/01/2010 09:54 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, November 01, 2010 8:38:15 am Stephen Clark wrote:
On 10/29/2010 05:20 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, October 29, 2010 4:20:24 pm Stephen Clark wrote:
rr232x: RocketRAID 232x controller driver v1.02 (Jan 16 2008 04
On 11/01/2010 01:42 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, November 01, 2010 1:30:35 pm Stephen Clark wrote:
On 11/01/2010 09:54 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, November 01, 2010 8:38:15 am Stephen Clark wrote:
On 10/29/2010 05:20 PM, John Baldwin wrote
Hello,
I am having a problem getting 6.3 to boot on an intel atom mb. When it
gets to
where it should identify the drive it hangs.
If I boot with no acpi it does the same thing.
If I boot with safe mode it comes up and identifies the drive but then
starts spewing the following errors:
ipfw2
On 10/29/2010 12:54 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:17:50AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
I am having a problem getting 6.3 to boot on an intel atom mb. When
it gets to where it should identify the drive it hangs.
Can you try 8.1-RELEASE or an 8.1-STABLE snapshot
On 10/29/2010 01:40 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 01:12:29PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
On 10/29/2010 12:54 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:17:50AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
I am having a problem getting 6.3 to boot on an intel
On 10/29/2010 03:51 PM, Stephen Clark wrote:
On 10/29/2010 01:40 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 01:12:29PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
On 10/29/2010 12:54 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:17:50AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
I am having a problem
On 06/08/2010 03:00 PM, Stephen Clark wrote:
On 06/08/2010 02:49 PM, Peter C. Lai wrote:
On 2010-06-08 11:44:29AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 02:26:10PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
On 06/08/2010 02:05 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 01:45:59PM
On 06/09/2010 08:28 AM, Reko Turja wrote:
One final comment - I still don't understand why FreeBSD won't
respond to pings
when it has an address like 169.254.1.1. I can ssh to the unit but it
won't
respond to pings. I tried setting up a linux box with an address like
169.254.1.2 and it would
Hi,
Why does FreeBSD 6.3 eat 169.254.x.x addressed packet when
4.9 didn't?
* 6.3 *
$ sudo ipfstat -nio
empty list for ipfilter(out)
empty list for ipfilter(in)
Z2984:~
$ ifconfig rl0
rl0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
options=8VLAN_MTU
inet
On 06/08/2010 02:05 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 01:45:59PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Why does FreeBSD 6.3 eat 169.254.x.x addressed packet when
4.9 didn't?
The following output would help:
- ifconfig -a
- netstat -rn
- Contents of /etc/rc.conf
Also, be aware
On 06/08/2010 02:21 PM, Guy Helmer wrote:
On Jun 8, 2010, at 12:45 PM, Stephen Clark wrote:
Hi,
Why does FreeBSD 6.3 eat 169.254.x.x addressed packet when
4.9 didn't?
* 6.3 *
$ sudo ipfstat -nio
empty list for ipfilter(out)
empty list for ipfilter(in)
Z2984:~
$ ifconfig rl0
rl0
On 06/08/2010 02:40 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Stephen Clarksclar...@earthlink.net wrote:
On 06/08/2010 02:21 PM, Guy Helmer wrote:
On Jun 8, 2010, at 12:45 PM, Stephen Clark wrote:
Hi,
Why does FreeBSD 6.3 eat 169.254.x.x addressed packet when
4.9 didn't
On 06/08/2010 02:49 PM, Peter C. Lai wrote:
On 2010-06-08 11:44:29AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 02:26:10PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
On 06/08/2010 02:05 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 01:45:59PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Why does FreeBSD 6.3
Nate Lawson wrote:
Ian Smith wrote:
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Nate Lawson wrote:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 09/04/2009 23:24 Stephen Clark said the following:
Is there a reason it doesn't send and event like Linux that can be acted
upon by user space other
than signaling init? I like
Hello,
I am trying to figure out what happens on a soft poweroff? Is there a userspace
script that gets called?
Thanks,
Steve
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe,
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 09/04/2009 19:17 Stephen Clark said the following:
Hello,
I am trying to figure out what happens on a soft poweroff? Is there a
userspace script that gets called?
If everything works correctly, then acpi driver sends a signal to init which
causes a typical
Dan Allen wrote:
While this enabled the mouse (without HAL), it did nothing good about:
a. The bogus keyboard scans.
Everyone is talking about an xorg.conf
The new X.org 7.4 upgrade hit me too: no keyboard no mouse! Bummer.
I found that if I simply added to /etc/rc.conf:
hald_enable=YES
Alex Goncharov wrote:
,--- You/Peter (Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:53:11 +1100) *
| X11 is a critical component for anyone who is using FreeBSD as a
| desktop and having upgrades fail or come with significant POLA
| violations and regressions for significant numbers of people is not
| acceptable.
Alex Goncharov wrote:
,--- You/Bruce (Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:06:45 +) *
| One theory is that somehow the mouse driver ioctls which are passed
| to ums, are somehow hosing USB, although why that would be, I don't
| understand. ums currently doesn't have driver instrumentation in that
Dan Allen wrote:
Thanks to Robert for pointing out a few things to me.
I have run
portupgrade -rf libxcb
I normally run portupgrade -WrRpPa
This is what I ran and it totally hosed my system.
I had to revert back to an earlier version to be able to
bring X back up.
This should have
Do any of the firewall products on FreeBSD provide support
for a natted ftp server sitting behind the FreeBSD FW.
Without having the ftp server advertise the external address
in its passive mode packet, in other words have the firewall
product look inside the packet and change the internal
Bartosz Stec wrote:
Stephen Clark pisze:
Do any of the firewall products on FreeBSD provide support
for a natted ftp server sitting behind the FreeBSD FW.
Without having the ftp server advertise the external address
in its passive mode packet, in other words have the firewall
product look
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, Robert Noland wrote:
Hi,
Also just using gre's without the
underlying ipsec tunnels seems to
work properly.
The reason for this to my knowledge is:
http://www.kame.net/dev/cvsweb2.cgi/kame/freebsd2/sys/netinet/ip_icmp.c#rev1.4
or looking at
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, Robert Noland wrote:
Hi,
Also just using gre's without the
underlying ipsec tunnels seems to
work properly.
The reason for this to my knowledge is:
http://www.kame.net/dev/cvsweb2.cgi/kame/freebsd2/sys/netinet/ip_icmp.c#rev1.4
or looking at
Stephen Clark wrote:
Robert Noland wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 07:48 -0500, Stephen Clark wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
you will need to define the setup and question better.
thanks.. cleaning it up a bit more...
10.0.129.1 FreeBSD workstation
10.0.129.1 FreeBSD workstation
^
|
| ethernet
|
v
10.0.128.1 Freebsd FW A
^
|
| ipsec
|
v
192.168.2.1 Linux FW B
^
|
| ethernet
|
v
192.168.2.20 linux workstation
from 192.168.2.20 Linux-ipsec-FreeBSD
traceroute -I 10.0.129.1
traceroute to 10.0.129.1
Holger Kipp wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 09:31:24AM -0500, Stephen Clark wrote:
Dear Stephen,
I don't want to be rude, but looking at your description I don't see
what's wrong with the behaviour, but it seems you don't understand what
'* * *' really means.
How does traceroute work? Well
Julian Elischer wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
10.0.129.1 FreeBSD workstation
^
|
| ethernet
|
v
10.0.128.1 Freebsd FW A
^
|
| gre / ipsec
|
v
192.168.3.1 FreeBSD FW B
^
|
| ethernet
|
v
192.168.3.86 linux workstation
Also just using gre's without
Why would du show 630k used by /tmp while df show 161M used
by /tmp?
# du -sh /tmp
630K/tmp
# df -h
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a 94M 41M 45M47%/
devfs 1.0K1.0K 0B 100%/dev
/dev/ad0s1e193M161M 17M
or
rebuilding tables)
-- Jille
Stephen Clark wrote:
Why would du show 630k used by /tmp while df show 161M used
by /tmp?
# du -sh /tmp
630K/tmp
# df -h
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a 94M 41M 45M47%/
devfs 1.0K1.0K 0B 100
Patrick Lamaizière wrote:
Le Wed, 08 Oct 2008 15:07:06 -0400,
Stephen Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Hello List,
We have 2 different platforms that we are trying to use the watchdog
timer and watchdogd program on. One is a Soekris 5501:
CPU: Geode(TM) Integrated Processor by AMD PCS
Hello List,
We have 2 different platforms that we are trying to use the watchdog timer and
watchdogd program on. One is a Soekris 5501:
CPU: Geode(TM) Integrated Processor by AMD PCS (433.25-MHz 586-class CPU)
Origin = AuthenticAMD Id = 0x5a2 Stepping = 2
Hello List,
I am running into a strange problem that points to a resource leak. The problem
manifests itself after one of our remote systems has been up around 100 days.
The symptom is that it appears no new processes can be spawned. If I try to
ssh to the unit, I can see the 3-way tcp
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 07:41:56AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Hello List,
I am running into a strange problem that points to a resource leak. The
problem manifests itself after one of our remote systems has been up
around 100 days.
The symptom is that it appears
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 08:30:26AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 07:41:56AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Hello List,
I am running into a strange problem that points to a resource leak.
The problem manifests itself after one
Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, Gary Palmer wrote:
Periodically logging ps -auxw output to a file would be useful, as
ideally you'd gradually see the list get longer and longer over time;
it's possible you have many zombie processes as a result of a parent
which is not reaping its
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 01:03:46PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 09:25:37AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 07:36:46AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
I am trying to get a crash dump but am unable to with FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE-p2
Hello List,
I am trying to get a crash dump but am unable to with FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE-p2
/etc/defaults/rc.conf
dumpdir=/var/crash# Directory where crash dumps are to be stored
savecore_flags= # Used if dumpdev is enabled above, and present.
Z2873# sysctl -a |grep physmem
hw.physmem:
Niki Denev wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:37 PM, Stephen Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to compile it on 6.2 and get
make: don't know how to make cryptodev_if.h. Stop
???
where is this file?
Thanks,
Steve
Have you applied the 6.2 patch included in the latest tgz
Niki Denev wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Patrick Lamaizière
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le Fri, 6 Jun 2008 23:41:35 +0200,
Patrick Lamaizière [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Hello,
I'm trying to port the glxsb driver from OpenBSD to FreeBSD 7-STABLE
(via the NetBSD port).
The glxsb
Scott Long wrote:
Jo Rhett wrote:
Okay, I totally understand that FreeBSD wants people to upgrade from
6.2 to 6.3. But given that 6.3 is still experiencing bugs with things
that are working fine and stable in 6.2, this is a pretty hard case to
make.
Can you describe the bugs that are
Doug Barton wrote:
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
The Apache page:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.3/misc/perf-tuning.html
It mentions FIN_WAIT_2 not 1, so this might be a different/new problem.
IIRC it actually is the same problem, but in any case you're missing the
bit where
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 09:40:20AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Mine is a nvidia 6300 mb with a dual core amd processor. I am causing the panic
while trying to develope a DD for a EVDO usb modem - so it is not a great
problem - I was just surprised it wasn't rebooting
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 09:47:59AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 09:40:20AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Mine is a nvidia 6300 mb with a dual core amd processor. I am causing the panic
while trying to develope a DD for a EVDO
Clifton Royston wrote:
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 03:15:51PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Matthew X. Economou wrote:
Steve,
I recall having to set dumpdev in /etc/rc.conf before I could get
FreeBSD to reboot automatically after a panic. I have dumpdev=AUTO
set on all of my headless servers
Hello List
How do I get my freebsd 6.1 box to automatically reboot after a panic?
Thanks,
Steve
--
They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety,
deserve neither liberty nor safety. (Ben Franklin)
The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty
decreases.
Matthew X. Economou wrote:
Steve,
I recall having to set dumpdev in /etc/rc.conf before I could get
FreeBSD to reboot automatically after a panic. I have dumpdev=AUTO
set on all of my headless servers. If you are feeling especially
brave, you can also set fsck_y_enable=YES and
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080311 08:46] wrote:
During heavy postgresql load (pgbench), /var/log/messages registers
(multiple times) the following message:
Approaching the limit on PV entries, consider increasing either the
vm.pmap.shpgperproc or the
Hello List,
Is there some way to debug a crash dump with kgdb when the crash is in a
module?
Steve
--
They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety,
deserve neither liberty nor safety. (Ben Franklin)
The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty
Stephen Clark wrote:
Hello List,
Is there some way to debug a crash dump with kgdb when the crash is in
a module?
Steve
My bad found it in the manual - I obviously did not read far enough.
sorry for the noise.
Steve
--
They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety
Hello List,
I am trying to debug a 6.1 panic. When I run kgdb kernel.debug
/var/crash/vmcore.7 all I get is:
kgdb: kvm_read: invalid address (0x24)
kgdb: kvm_read: invalid address (0x24)
kgdb: kvm_read: invalid address (0x24)
kgdb: kvm_read: invalid address (0x24)
kgdb: kvm_read: invalid
Stephen Clark wrote:
Hello List,
I am trying to debug a 6.1 panic. When I run kgdb kernel.debug
/var/crash/vmcore.7 all I get is:
kgdb: kvm_read: invalid address (0x24)
kgdb: kvm_read: invalid address (0x24)
kgdb: kvm_read: invalid address (0x24)
kgdb: kvm_read: invalid address (0x24)
kgdb
Hello List,
Can someone tell me why ipf_nattable_max is not a sysctl variable. The
only way to change this currently
is via a edit the source and rebuild.
It looks like it would be as simple as adding:
SYSCTL_IPF(_net_inet_ipf, OID_AUTO, pf_nattable_max, CTLFLAG_RWO,
Hello List,
I know FreeBSD 4.x is old..., but we are using on a production system
with postgres and apache. The above message
is appearing periodically. I googled for the message but found no
recommendation for adjusting it.
Any suggestions.
Thanks,
Steve
--
They that give up essential
Claus Guttesen wrote:
I know FreeBSD 4.x is old..., but we are using on a production system
with postgres and apache. The above message
is appearing periodically. I googled for the message but found no
recommendation for adjusting it.
Is the sysctl kern.vm.pmap.shpgperproc available on
Uwe Doering wrote:
Hi Steve,
Stephen Clark wrote:
Uwe Doering wrote:
[...]
But you can put that option into the kernel config file:
options PMAP_SHPGPERPROC=...
and build a new kernel with it.
You are correct. My question is more how much should I increase it.
The current default
Hello List,
Was a fix ever developed for the ip filter OOW keep state problem that can
be installed on or back ported to 6.1 stable?
Thanks for any advice,
Steve
--
They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety,
deserve neither liberty nor safety. (Ben Franklin)
The
Ivan Voras wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
looking at kmem_suballoc which calls vm_map_find which returns
KERN_NO_SPACE
which is defined as 3.
Why would there be no space when I have 24GB of memory?
1. Any process, including the kernel can only allocate up to 4 GB of
memory on a 32-bit
Hello List,
I have a Dell PE 4600 with 24MB of memory that I am trying to run
6.2-RELEASE-p7 compiled with the standard PAE config file.
I get the following at boot: (hand copied)
6.2-RELEASE-p7
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/PAE
acpi_alloc_wakeup_handler can't alloc wake memory
Chuck Swiger wrote:
Hi--
Stephen Clark wrote:
I have a Dell PE 4600 with 24MB of memory that I am trying to run
6.2-RELEASE-p7 compiled with the standard PAE config file.
Just double-checking, here: your machine only has 24MB of memory?
PAE is only really useful on 32-bit systems
Chuck Swiger wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
Chuck Swiger wrote:
[ ... ]
Oops, I should have said 24GB.
Real Memory = 25769803776 (24576 MB)
...which matches your dmesg, right. No harm double-checking. :-)
Hmm-- I haven't put more than 3 GB into a machine which didn't have
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 04:56 PM 8/27/2007, Stephen Clark wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to get a Novatel Wireless Ovation U720 EVDO modem to
work with Freebsd.
So far I am not having any luck. When it is plugged in it is
recognizes as a ugen device it
needs to look like a serial device
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 04:56 PM 8/27/2007, Stephen Clark wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to get a Novatel Wireless Ovation U720 EVDO modem to
work with Freebsd.
So far I am not having any luck. When it is plugged in it is
recognizes as a ugen device it
needs to look like a serial device
Hello,
I am trying to get a Novatel Wireless Ovation U720 EVDO modem to work
with Freebsd.
So far I am not having any luck. When it is plugged in it is recognizes
as a ugen device it
needs to look like a serial device, as it is sort of like a hayes modem.
It has a vendor id of 0x1410 and a
Doug Barton wrote:
Steven Hartland wrote:
I assume the security team are already working on this but
cant hurt to ask:
Before you ask questions on a public list it's generally considered
polite to do a little checking yourself, especially in an open source
project. As Mike pointed
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Jul 12, 2007, at 1:38 PM, Stephen Clark wrote:
The MTU is actually defined in reference to a network segment such
as an ethernet collision domain, and applies to all machines
sending traffic to that segment. If the MTU is really 1280,
nobody else
Hi List,
When using ipnat, part of ipfilter 4.1.13, I don't see any
icmp packets being returned saying:
Host Unreachable, frag needed and DF set.
type 3, code 4
It does work if I am not using ipnat.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Steve
--
They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety,
Stephen Clark wrote:
Hi List,
When using ipnat, part of ipfilter 4.1.13, I don't see any
icmp packets being returned saying:
Host Unreachable, frag needed and DF set.
type 3, code 4
It does work if I am not using ipnat.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Steve
Sorry for the noise - this seems to be OK
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jul 12, 2007, at 12:34 PM, Stephen Clark wrote:
Did something change in 6.2? If my mtu size on rl0 is 1280 it won't
accept a larger incoming packet.
Nothing changed; that is the expected behavior.
(Modulo support for 4-byte VLAN tags.)
kernel: rl0: discard
viper wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:59:46 -0400, Stephen Clark wrote
Hello List,
I posted a while ago that our testers of our network appliance were
complaining
that browsing was slower when using our appliance based on 6.x as
compared to
our appliance using 4.9 FreeBSD.
Well it turns
Hello List,
I posted a while ago that our testers of our network appliance were
complaining
that browsing was slower when using our appliance based on 6.x as
compared to
our appliance using 4.9 FreeBSD.
Well it turns out they were right! After spending much time trying to
figure out what
Hello List,
A few weeks ago I installed 6.2. I did a cvsup of the ports and now
anytime I try to make
anything that uses X I get something like the following:
=== Patching for tk-8.5.a.6_1
=== Applying FreeBSD patches for tk-8.5.a.6_1
=== tk-8.5.a.6_1 depends on file:
Tom Evans wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 09:22 -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Hello List,
A few weeks ago I installed 6.2. I did a cvsup of the ports and now
anytime I try to make
anything that uses X I get something like the following:
=== Patching for tk-8.5.a.6_1
=== Applying FreeBSD
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
Tom Evans wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
I'd read /usr/ports/UPDATING again, if you follow the exact instructions
I have it printed out sitting right
in front of me.
Then there shouldn't be any problem
Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:45:34 -0400
From: Stephen Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Evans wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 09:22 -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Hello List,
A few weeks ago I installed 6.2. I did a cvsup of the ports and now
Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
On Friday, 8 June 2007 at 14:34:14 -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:45:34 -0400
From: Stephen Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Evans wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 09:22 -0400, Stephen
Mark Linimon wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 03:26:21PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Thats another question - why aren't packages released simultaneously
with the ports update?
There's a circular dependency here. The ports tree is updated by checkins,
which is then pushed
Hello List,
We have a network appliance that is currently based on 4.9. We are in
the process of releasing
a new version based on 6.1 stable.
In our testing using nttcp thru the appliance we see insignifant
difference in thruput between the 2
versions in a controlled environment -
Dominic Marks wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
Hello List,
We have a network appliance that is currently based on 4.9. We are in
the process of releasing
a new version based on 6.1 stable.
You are going to get asked this, so I'll ask first.
Whats the reason behind not running a more
Hello List,
I apologize if this is not the correct place to ask this. What is the
best way to create an
archive of a FreeBSD system so yoy can take it to another computer and
unarchive and
have a runnable system, assuming the other systems disk had already been
formatted
with the appropriate
Hello List,
When I boot linux from my usb cdrom it works great
- but when I try the
6.1 release media
it fails - BTX crashes.
I found a listed bug kern/85257 that seems to be
the same problem. Had
this been resolved?
Will it be resolved?
Thanks,
Steve
--
They that give up essential
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 09:21:05AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Hello List,
When I boot linux from my usb cdrom it works great
- but when I try the
6.1 release media
it fails - BTX crashes.
I found a listed bug kern/85257 that seems to be
the same problem. Had
Marc Santhoff wrote:
Am Montag, den 26.03.2007, 14:36 -0400 schrieb Mikhail Teterin:
Over a year later this remains a problem -- exactly as described below...
No other SATA devices are present -- the only other IDE device is the DVD
drive. My main disks are SCSI.
What's MUCH worse is
Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
On 2006.12.28 19:55:55 -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Is there any official doc on this? Perhaps I'm just not finding it? I
would assume since everyone is being urged to get away from 4.x that
somewhere there's a good step-by-step on how to do that.
Hello List,
We are having a strange problem with RELENG_6_1 and ipfilter 4.1.8.
We are running gre tunnels over fast_ipsec tunnels. We have the following
rule in ipf:
pass out proto icmp from any to any keep state
When we ping from the remote end across the ipsec tunnel to the ipsec
local
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Michael Abbott wrote:
Roland Smith wrote:
Martin Nilsson wrote:
Hans Lambermont wrote:
.. or just stop calling it STABLE and call it RELENG_6 instead
That's a good idea, IMHO. When I started with FreeBSD I found the
difference between the branch names and
Volker wrote:
On 2006-09-11 01:33, 'Anubhav A.' wrote:
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote Volker thusly...
we're talking about software. Have you ever seen a piece of software which has
been really bug-free? Not the hello-world, I'm talking
Recently i read about which is more
Adrian Steinmann wrote:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 08:36:21AM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 08:29:13AM +0200, Adrian Steinmann wrote:
In my kernel config, I have
options FAST_IPSEC
device padlock
device crypto
...
Yet when I configure
Hello list,
I have a production system that is running 4.10. It is a Dell 4600
poweredge server.
When I try to kldload if_bge I get the following in /var/log/messages:
Sep 6 18:07:48 GE_SRM2_42 /kernel: bge0: Broadcom BCM5700 Gigabit
Ethernet, ASIC r
ev. 0x7104 mem 0xfcf0-0xfcf0 irq
Hello list,
We have been running 4.9 and using freevrrpd 0.9.3, which worked great,
- the latest in the ports tree. We are switching
to 6.1 released and we now get the the following error from freevrrpd:
freevrrpd[6241]: cannot do ioctl, intertface is faulty: Device not
configured
This is a
Update:
We reverted to freevrrpd 0.8.7 which seems to work.
Steve
Stephen Clark wrote:
Hello list,
We have been running 4.9 and using freevrrpd 0.9.3, which worked great,
- the latest in the ports tree. We are switching
to 6.1 released and we now get the the following error from freevrrpd
Hi list,
Should a 6.1 smp compiled kernel run Ok on a uniprocessor?
We ship both single core and dual core systems and would like to use
only one
kernel.
Thanks,
Steve
--
They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety,
deserve neither liberty nor safety. (Ben Franklin)
Hello List,
Below is a patch to the nvidia ethernet driver to make the onboard
ethernet port
work on the above mentioned MB.
How do I get this committed?
Thanks,
Steve
--- nve/if_nve.cSun Dec 25 16:57:03 2005
+++ mynve/if_nve.c Fri Apr 28 19:42:36 2006
@@ -235,6 +235,8 @@
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
