Re: bhyve with AMD Ryzen 3900X and MSI MEG ACE X570

essage with subject or body 'help' to >> >> freebsd-virtualization-requ...@freebsd.org >> >> >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> >> freebsd-virtualization-ow...@freebsd.org >> >> >> >> When replyi

Re: bhyve with AMD Ryzen 3900X and MSI MEG ACE X570

> >> > >> You can reach the person managing the list at > >> freebsd-virtualization-ow...@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-virtualization-ow...@freebsd.org> > >> > >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific

Re: bhyve with AMD Ryzen 3900X and MSI MEG ACE X570

Hello Anish, thank you for your information. Executing cpucontrol -m 0xc0010114 /dev/cpuctl0 or cpucontrol -m 0xc0010114 /dev/cpuctl1 I got MSR 0xc0010114: 0x 0x0018 Regards --Christian Am 26.04.20 um 21:07 schrieb Anish: cpucontrol -m 0xc0010114

Re: bhyve with AMD Ryzen 3900X and MSI MEG ACE X570

Hello Eric, thank you for your information. I will first check if I can find a way in the BIOS to configure SVM. Fromy my point of view MSI should provie a BIOS where it is possible to configure this option. If this does not work I will look for your hint. Regards --Christian Am 26.04.20

Re: bhyve with AMD Ryzen 3900X and MSI MEG ACE X570

Hello Henrik, many thanks for your information. I have checked the MSI forum entry. They say that the information about SVM in the overclocking section could be wrong. As I do not see this value somewhere else where I can configure it it seems to me that this output in this BIOS part is not

Re: bhyve with AMD Ryzen 3900X and MSI MEG ACE X570

t;> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization > > >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > > >> freebsd-virtualization-requ...@freebsd.org > > >> > > >> You can reach the person managing the list a

Re: bhyve with AMD Ryzen 3900X and MSI MEG ACE X570

the list at > >> freebsd-virtualization-ow...@freebsd.org > >> > >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > >> than "Re: Contents of freebsd-virtualization digest..." > >> > >> > >> Today's Topics: &

Re: bhyve with AMD Ryzen 3900X and MSI MEG ACE X570

On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 3:26 PM Anish wrote: > [Resending without screenshot to reduce message size] > > Hi Christian, > > This looks like BIOS issue, BIOS must not set Bit4/SVMDIS in VM_CR MSR > It is likely not a BIOS issue per se because I have a near identical setup and the BIOS (AMI) set

Re: bhyve with AMD Ryzen 3900X and MSI MEG ACE X570

alization-ow...@freebsd.org > >> > >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > >> than "Re: Contents of freebsd-virtualization digest..." > >> > >> > >> Today's Topics: > >> > >

Re: bhyve with AMD Ryzen 3900X and MSI MEG ACE X570

>If SVM is actually disabled, I have no idea what impact this change will have, so beware. As per the AMD document, it will cause GP fault if it has been implemented as per specification. If we are lucky and it works, that will be an interesting finding. -Anish On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 10:53 AM

Re: bhyve with AMD Ryzen 3900X and MSI MEG ACE X570

On 4/26/20 3:57 AM, Christian Jeannot wrote: Hi Community, I am testing bhyve from FreeBSD 12.1 RELEASE. My environment: - CPU: AMD Ryze 3900X - Mainboard: MSI MEG ACE X570, Default settings, latest BIOS 7C35v18 - RAM: G.Skill RipJaws V DIMM Kit 64GB, DDR4-3200, CL16-18-18-38 - GPU: Sapphire

Re: bhyve with AMD Ryzen 3900X and MSI MEG ACE X570

-requ...@freebsd.org You can reach the person managing the list at freebsd-virtualization-ow...@freebsd.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of freebsd-virtualization digest..." Today's Topics: 1. bhyve with AMD Ryzen 3900X a

Re: bhyve with AMD Ryzen 3900X and MSI MEG ACE X570

ow...@freebsd.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of freebsd-virtualization digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. bhyve with AMD Ryzen 3900X and MSI MEG ACE X570 > (Christian Jeannot)

Re: bhyve with AMD Ryzen 3900X and MSI MEG ACE X570

Am 26.04.20 um 11:32 schrieb Aryeh Friedman: On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 4:57 AM Christian Jeannot > wrote: Hi Community, I am testing bhyve from FreeBSD 12.1 RELEASE. My environment: - CPU: AMD Ryze 3900X - Mainboard: MSI MEG ACE X570, Default

Re: bhyve with AMD Ryzen 3900X and MSI MEG ACE X570

On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 4:57 AM Christian Jeannot wrote: > Hi Community, > > I am testing bhyve from FreeBSD 12.1 RELEASE. > > My environment: > - CPU: AMD Ryze 3900X > - Mainboard: MSI MEG ACE X570, Default settings, latest BIOS 7C35v18 > - RAM: G.Skill RipJaws V DIMM Kit 64GB, DDR4-3200,

bhyve with AMD Ryzen 3900X and MSI MEG ACE X570

Hi Community, I am testing bhyve from FreeBSD 12.1 RELEASE. My environment: - CPU: AMD Ryze 3900X - Mainboard: MSI MEG ACE X570, Default settings, latest BIOS 7C35v18 - RAM: G.Skill RipJaws V DIMM Kit 64GB, DDR4-3200, CL16-18-18-38 - GPU: Sapphire Nitro RX 5700XT I checked the settings in the

[Bug 236374] bhyve: vmm/amd: ivhd0: Error: completion failed

Summary|vmm/amd: ivhd0: Error: |bhyve: vmm/amd: ivhd0: |completion failed |Error: completion failed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org

Re: OpenBSD guest in bhyve on AMD CPU

On 24 February 2015 at 16:37, Neel Natu neeln...@gmail.com wrote: I suspect that the guest is getting a #GP exception when accessing an MSR that is not emulated by bhyve. Can you start the guest with the -w option passed to bhyve? r279227 has a fix for this and should allow booting without

Re: OpenBSD guest in bhyve on AMD CPU

Hi Jason, On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Neel Natu neeln...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jason, On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Jason Tubnor ja...@tubnor.net wrote: Hi, As posted in IRC, I am checking here if anyone has come across this issue. During boot on OpenBSD I get: panic: trap type 4,

How to update bhyve (supporting amd) from freebsd-10.1

Hi! I know, that bhyve support AMD processors from version r273375.. I have processor, that support RVI and Freebsd-10.1 (release). So.. How to update (patch/rebuild/something else) bhyve to r2773375 on my fresh freebsd 10.1? Is it possible? I just want to install several virtual freebsd

testing bhyve on AMD box...

So, I did, and it failed... First, if_tap doesn't get automatically loaded.. but that was easy to spot due to the error message... loader runs fine, but then after hitting enter, I get the following: /tmp/bhyve.4dv5wFK 91: [0008] FACS Address : 000F27C0 Error6154 -

Re: testing bhyve on AMD box...

Neel Natu wrote this message on Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:01 -0700: On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 11:50 AM, John-Mark Gurney j...@funkthat.com wrote: So, I did, and it failed... First, if_tap doesn't get automatically loaded.. but that was easy to spot due to the error message... loader runs

Re: bhyve: svm (amd-v) update

On 15-5-2014 17:56, Anish wrote: Hi Andriy, Thanks for your interest in SVM port of bhyve. I do have patch to sync it to http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=263780(3/26). If patches looks good to you, we can submit it. I have been testing it on Phenom box which lacks some of

bhyve on AMD, linux and high load

Hoi, Just a point on the timeline I think somebody asked why his CPU load was so high on AMD running linux. I've completed compiling a fresh linux-kernel on my Ubuntu 14.04 system, installed and rebooted it. And where previously a Linux-kernel would drain the CPUs it got assigned to the

Re: bhyve on AMD, linux and high load

On 2014-05-22 18:24, Nils Beyer wrote: Hi Willem, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: [...] With the new kernel, that is no longer the case. On a idle vm the CPU load is like 6-7% At the moment I'm running: linux-image-3.13.0-24-generic_3.13.0-24.46_amd64 Now, that looks promising. Is that with

Re: bhyve on AMD, linux and high load

On 22-5-2014 21:29, Nils Beyer wrote: Hi, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: I've just completed merging and patching with Anish patches... ONce that seems to run for my freebsd vm's, I'll start merging my patches. And hope that it still works. Sounds good. I've tried some Linux versions ranging

Re: bhyve: svm (amd-v) update

On 2014-05-21 6:59, Anish wrote: Hi Willem, Thanks for sharing your patch. I see that you have gone further than what I have. Are you able to boot Linux with these changes? I'm running ubuntu-{12.x,14.04} with this and I'm able to compile the linux kernel. Peter helped a lot in getting it

Re: bhyve: svm (amd-v) update

Hi Willem, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: I'd be interested in the vlapic to if that helps the speed. But you can help me a lot if you give me the SVN commands to do what you described above. These were my steps: 0) mv /usr/src /usr/src.bak 1) svnlite co

Re: bhyve: svm (amd-v) update

On 2014-05-21 11:31, Nils Beyer wrote: Hi Willem, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: I'd be interested in the vlapic to if that helps the speed. But you can help me a lot if you give me the SVN commands to do what you described above. These were my steps: 0) mv /usr/src /usr/src.bak 1) svnlite co

Re: bhyve: svm (amd-v) update

On 15-5-2014 17:56, Anish wrote: Hi Andriy, Thanks for your interest in SVM port of bhyve. I do have patch to sync it to http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=263780(3/26). If patches looks good to you, we can submit it. I have been testing it on Phenom box which lacks some of

Re: bhyve: svm (amd-v) update

Hi Willem, I patch against bhyve_SVM, because in the later case I get complaints that This patch is to sync bhyve_svm project branch with HEAD @263780, so you have to first merge HEAD to bhyve_svm. It will prompt you to resolve conflict in amdv.c, you should accept the changes that are in

Re: bhyve: svm (amd-v) update

Thanks for testing it. Your patch applied cleanly to the working copy of the bhyve_svm-project. I was then able to merge with HEAD (using theirs-full on one file) and compile the kernel. So, to me it looks OK to commit. Yes, that's correct. You have to retain changes in sys/amd64/vmm/amd/amdv.c

Re: bhyve: svm (amd-v) update

Hi Anish, Anish wrote: If patches looks good to you, we can submit it. I have been testing it on Phenom box which lacks some of newer SVM features. Your patch applied cleanly to the working copy of the bhyve_svm-project. I was then able to merge with HEAD (using theirs-full on one file) and

bhyve: svm (amd-v) update

It seems that the bhyve_svm branch is a bit behind the latest interface changes in head. Is anyone working on sync-ing up the branch with the head? Some examples: - change of init method in vmm_ops - addition of resume, vlapic_init and vlapic_cleanup methods to vmm_ops - replacement of

Re: bhyve: svm (amd-v) update

Hi Andriy, Thanks for your interest in SVM port of bhyve. I do have patch to sync it to http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=263780(3/26). If patches looks good to you, we can submit it. I have been testing it on Phenom box which lacks some of newer SVM features. Thanks and

best branch for bhyve on AMD?

for AMD processors is not yet in -STABLE? If so, is there working code for bhyve under AMD anywhere? Where? -HEAD, projects/bhyve_svm or somewhere else? Is it considered experimental, stable, or something in between? Should it work with the above processor? Looking forward to trying bhyve

Re: best branch for bhyve on AMD?

gives: vm_create: Device not configured Am I right in thinking that bhyve support for AMD processors is not yet in -STABLE? If so, is there working code for bhyve under AMD anywhere? Where? -HEAD, projects/bhyve_svm or somewhere else? Is it considered experimental, stable, or something

Re: best branch for bhyve on AMD?

Hi John, Am I right in thinking that bhyve support for AMD processors is not yet in -STABLE? Yes, that's correct. If so, is there working code for bhyve under AMD anywhere? Where? -HEAD, projects/bhyve_svm or somewhere else? projects/bhyve_svm Is it considered experimental, stable

Re: bhyve and AMD

Hi, The bhyve site says, AMD SVN support arrived on August 22nd, 2013 with FreeBSD svn r254677 and requires testing. How can we tell which AMD processors are supported? Would that be the same AMD processors that are listed on the following page as having Rapid Virtualization Indexing Required

Re: bhyve and AMD

On Wed, September 11, 2013 4:11 pm, Peter Grehan wrote: [...] Yes, that would be it. The RVI support has been there in CPUs for quite a long time now - it would be hard to find a recent AMD CPU that doesn't have it. [DN:] Or is bhyve using a different feature of some AMD processors? [PG:]

Re: bhyve and AMD

(Anish - is nRIP required ?) Yes, nRIP is required and it will be hard to find AMD processor with SVM support that doesn't have it. We used Phenom II for bhyve port on AMD which is 2+ years old and has RVI and nRIP support. I use http://instlatx64.atw.hu/ to check SVM CPUID capability and looks

Re: bhyve and AMD

Hi, No, that's the main one. [DN:] When you say that that's the main one, do you mean that there are also other features that an AMD processor must have, besides RVI, to be compatible with bhyve, but that might be absent in some AMD processors with RVI? If so, what other features should I

Re: bhyve and AMD

On Wed, September 11, 2013 5:20 pm, Anish wrote: Yes, nRIP is required and it will be hard to find AMD processor with SVM support that doesn't have it. We used Phenom II for bhyve port on AMD which is 2+ years old and has RVI and nRIP support. I'm sorry to have to ask this, but what is nRIP

Re: Bhyve on AMD possible?

Hi Peter Is there any reason for the AMD SVM support to be not in place ? Am I missing something here? Is there any effort currently that you are aware of to make it work with AMD SVM? Thanks On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Peter Grehan gre...@freebsd.org wrote: I would like to inform me

Re: Bhyve on AMD possible?

Hi, Is there any reason for the AMD SVM support to be not in place ? There wasn't enough time to get it going when bhyve was first developed. Am I missing something here? Is there any effort currently that you are aware of to make it work with AMD SVM? No current effort to my knowledge.

Bhyve on AMD possible?

Hi there, I would like to inform me about support for AMD bases CPU's on BHYVE sysctl -a | egrep -i 'hw.machine|hw.model|hw.ncpu' hw.machine: amd64 hw.model: Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2374 HE hw.ncpu: 8 hw.machine_arch: amd64 Could it run on such an CPU? cheers Darko

Re: Bhyve on AMD possible?

I would like to inform me about support for AMD bases CPU's on BHYVE The hooks are there, but no code currently to implement AMD's SVM. later, Peter. ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Bhyve on AMD possible?

Hello Peter, Am Donnerstag, den 29.03.2012, 17:14 -0600 schrieb Peter Grehan: I would like to inform me about support for AMD bases CPU's on BHYVE The hooks are there, but no code currently to implement AMD's SVM. later, Peter. Thynk you for your respond. OK I've to wait :( cheers