Re: [Freedos-devel] Proposal for new package in T2405

with the other IA-16 packages. So, it will be on the next interim test build. :-) Jerome ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS on Pocket386

Hi Jim, > On May 28, 2024, at 6:12 PM, Jim Hall via Freedos-devel > wrote: > > *I'm resending (with a few edits/updates) because this message failed > over the weekend due to the SF list server outage > > > You may remember the Book8088 micro-laptop and Hand386 handheld from > last year. I

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS on Pocket386

> On May 28, 2024, at 6:12 PM, Jim Hall via Freedos-devel > wrote: > [..] > I also ordered a PS/2 keyboard, because the built-in keyboard is too > tiny to do real work on. It's 8 1/4 x 4 1/2 x 1 1/4 (inches). I just got one a few weeks ago along with a PS/2 mouse. Both brand new. I was kind

Re: [Freedos-devel] Virtual dot matrix printer

racted a lot and the game engine presents it to the program like UI elements (buttons, menu items, etc). But, going a couple layers into the abstraction it is nothing like that at all. Depending on memory requirements, the engine is locking, releasing, loading and discarding all that stuff from ima

Re: [Freedos-devel] Proposal for new package in T2405

ou unzip this at >>> the root dir, then both get installed to \devel\i16gcc. I've copied >>> the zip file to the FreeDOS Files Archive at Ibiblio, here: >>> >>> https://ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/devel/c/gcc-ia16/ >>> I16ENV.ZIP >>

Re: [Freedos-devel] Proposal for new package in T2405

Hi Jim, > On May 28, 2024, at 3:47 PM, Jim Hall via Freedos-devel > wrote: > > This didn't get any discussion a month ago. Since it didn't appear in > T2405, I wanted to raise it again for T2406. Can we add this to T2406? > Adding a DJGPP.ENV file is all you need to compile programs with

Re: [Freedos-devel] zoo

Hi Tom, > On May 23, 2024, at 2:04 PM, tom ehlert via Freedos-devel > wrote: > > Hi Wilhelm , > [..] >> But I got the feedback from Jerome to ask the FD mailing list first as it >> is not possible to remove it if only one person >> asks for removing.

Re: [Freedos-devel] still can't find the source code

On 5/10/24 09:45, Green Fog via Freedos-devel wrote: There you go. The 2 requirements for free dos being a thing are just not there. not ease of use. I need to use an antique mail list for communication and wiki/documentation. It's absurd and very not efficient. I am very busy, and I can't

Re: [Freedos-devel] still can't find the source code

> On May 8, 2024, at 5:50 AM, Green Fog via Freedos-devel > wrote: >  > I can see the potential of Freedos if these 2 conditions are met: > > 1, ease of use. Absolutely both for users and developers. Or else who is > going to use it? or develop more fun and useful applications to it. So

Re: [Freedos-devel] still can't find the source code

 > On May 8, 2024, at 5:50 AM, Green Fog via Freedos-devel > wrote: >  > I can see the potential of Freedos if these 2 conditions are met: > > 1, ease of use. Absolutely both for users and developers. Or else who is > going to use it? or develop more fun and useful applications to it. So

Re: [Freedos-devel] A FreeCOM+DOSBox bug

(one that does not pause), causes the  FreeCOM shell to terminate as well. So, IDK. On 5/4/24 03:05, Jerome Shidel via Freedos-devel wrote: Hi all, I do a lot of my programming under DOSBox running the FreeCOM shell. This provides me with the most convenient development process. However

[Freedos-devel] A FreeCOM+DOSBox bug

it should. So, IDK. Unfortunately, I don't have the time to dive into it further. :-) Jerome ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Interim Build T2405

Hi Willi,On May 1, 2024, at 10:20 AM, Wilhelm Spiegl via Freedos-devel wrote:Hi Jerome, thanks for this statement.   I know that you are very very busy, and it is not really urgent, but it would be nice to keep it in mind.   http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files

[Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Interim Build T2405

The FreeDOS Interim Test Build T2405 for May is now available for download at: https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/test/ A special thanks to Wilhelm for pointing out most of the

[Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Wiki

Hi, Apparently, the (old) FreeDOS wiki on sourceforge is down or broken. After visiting the FreeDOS.org website, navigating to “Read the wiki ” and waiting, I just get a blank page after redirection to the

Re: [Freedos-devel] FETCH4FD

Hi Laaca, I included the NLS files for FETCH4FD over on the FD-NLS project. Berki has already provided translations for French and Turkish. https://github.com/shidel/fd-nls/tree/master/fetch4fd/nls Also if you could clarify the

Re: [Freedos-devel] FETCH4FD

me general system information. Like RAM, CPU and Drives. :-) Jerome ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Re: [Freedos-devel] Reminder: FreeDOS virtual get-together on Sunday

to go. Don’t know oh w about the rest. They could still be there. :-) Jerome > ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Re: [Freedos-devel] Updated FDAUTO.BAT file

Attached is my proposed revisions to FDAUTO. @ECHO OFF REM - Updated AUTOEXEC file, for 386 or better hardware REM - set basic environment set DOSDRV=C: set DOSDIR=%DOSDRV%\FREEDOS path %DOSDIR%\BIN if not exist %DOSDIR%\LINKS\NUL goto NOLINKS path %PATH%;%DOSDIR%\LINKS :NOLINKS set

Re: [Freedos-devel] Updated FDAUTO.BAT file

t a fan of cfgfile and autofile since the user could > always rename FDCONFIG.SYS in favor of using CONFIG.SYS .. but FDAUTO > will still report "Done processing startup files C:\FDCONFIG.SYS and > C:\FDAUTO.BAT" (this is actually printed in WELCOME.BAT). So I'

[Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Interim Build T2403

The FreeDOS Interim Test Build T2403 for March is now available for download at: https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/test/ Changes: * Primarily, the release was switched back to

Re: [Freedos-devel] FDISK 1.3.14

14/ <https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/dos/fdisk/1.3.14/> :-) Jerome ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Re: [Freedos-devel] NewDOS source code has been published!

Willi > They are small sites. So, I also mirrored them on my server as well. They can be found along with the mirror of Eric’s website at https://m.lod.bz <https://m.lod.bz/> :-) Jerome ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Re: [Freedos-devel] Tree v3.7.3 Was: Re: Xcopy 1.5

FD-NLS in the zip. So, I just included them. Although, I forget if TREE displays those versions of help when using a different language. I’ll definitely have to give it a try. > > (ps a new test kernel release is pending, but I'm trying to figure > out/fix a driver hang during

Re: [Freedos-devel] Append

Hi Eduardo, > On Feb 17, 2024, at 4:54 PM, Eduardo Casino via Freedos-devel > wrote: > > Hi Jerome, > > I'm the autor of Append. I'll have a look at it, although it's been a long > time... > > Thanks, > Eduardo Great. Bernd took a look at the merge r

[Freedos-devel] Append

Hi All, Append received a “critical” merge request in the GitLab Archive. https://gitlab.com/FreeDOS/base/append/-/merge_requests/1 Since, no know developer is maintaining that program, it would be great for someone to volunteer to

Re: [Freedos-devel] HTMLHELP

uld still use a lot of streamlining and other general improvements. Maybe that will happen if I ever get around to making the next incarnation of the RBE. Even as it is now, it is still kind of a marvel to watch in action. > > Bernd Keep me posted on your efforts. :-) Jerome __

Re: [Freedos-devel] HTMLHELP

the beginning. It could have been a corrupt download of openSUSE. Left me know if this helped and fixes the build issue you had. Thanks, Jerome ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists

Re: [Freedos-devel] HTMLHELP

Hi, > On Feb 11, 2024, at 7:43 PM, Bernd Böckmann via Freedos-devel > wrote: > > Hi Jerome, > > it currently fails at: > > tools/common: line 1075: make-dosfs: command not found > > I am currently searching for the make-dosfs executable.//It is not under t

Re: [Freedos-devel] HTMLHELP

Hi Bernd, > On Feb 11, 2024, at 2:11 PM, Bernd Böckmann via Freedos-devel > wrote: > > Hi Jerome, > > thanks for the explanations! > >>> Am 10.02.2024 um 00:18 schrieb Jerome Shidel via Freedos-devel >>> : >> >> Oh BTW... If your inter

Re: [Freedos-devel] HTMLHELP

-/tree/unstable/BIN <https://gitlab.com/FreeDOS/base/fdhelper/-/tree/unstable/BIN> All fairly simple to do. If you want to issue some pull requests with the changes thats fine. Otherwise, I’ll get to it sometime over the next few days. :-) Jerome Oh BTW... If your interested in see

Re: [Freedos-devel] NLS in Edlin

Ralf, > On Feb 4, 2024, at 2:55 PM, Ralf Quint via Freedos-devel > wrote: > > On 2/4/2024 11:32 AM, Jerome Shidel via Freedos-devel wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> On Feb 4, 2024, at 2:16 PM, Ralf Quint via Freedos-devel >>> wrote: >>> >>> O

[Freedos-devel] HELP.BAT and other OS Batch files

Hi Jim, Per our discussion during the online meeting, if you are interested in updating some of the included connivence batch files (like HELP.BAT). Their home is at GitLab at in the FDHELPER project. https://gitlab.com/FreeDOS/base/fdhelper Some of

Re: [Freedos-devel] NLS in Edlin

bo Pascal) could be built from source simply by installing the required build packages. This leads me to think, maybe we should go back to the old days when sources were in their own separate package and not included in the binaries package. Jerome ___

Re: [Freedos-devel] Link for today's virtual meeting

Hi Jim, Interestingly, when you left the online meeting, it kept going at least for a few seconds until I clicked end-call. I don’t know if it would have kept going indefinitely. We will have to try that next time. :-) Jerome ___ Freedos-devel

Re: [Freedos-devel] Cleaning up FDAUTO

oved without concern of breaking anything in FDAUTO or the FDCONFIG files. > >>> REM nlsfunc %DOSDIR%\BIN\COUNTRY.SYS >>> REM display CON=(EGA,858,2) >>> REM mode CON CP PREP=((858) %DOSDIR%\CPI\EGA.CPX) >>> REM keyb US,858,%DOSDIR%\bin\keyboard.sys >>

Re: [Freedos-devel] Cleaning up FDAUTO

ntil I’ve finished my first coffee before > responding to email. > > Or… > > Maybe, proofread before clicking send. Lots of typographic errors. > > LOL. > > Jerome > >> On Feb 3, 2024, at 5:20 AM, Jerome Shidel via Freedos-devel >> > <mailto:f

Re: [Freedos-devel] Cleaning up FDAUTO

Wow, I should really wait until I’ve finished my first coffee before responding to email. Or… Maybe, proofread before clicking send. Lots of typographic errors. LOL. Jerome > On Feb 3, 2024, at 5:20 AM, Jerome Shidel via Freedos-devel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > >> On

Re: [Freedos-devel] Cleaning up FDAUTO

Hi Jim, > On Feb 2, 2024, at 8:07 PM, Jim Hall via Freedos-devel > wrote: > > Here's my second pass at cleaning up my FDAUTO.BAT file. If you like > it, feel free to use it. This does a lot of streamlining from the > "stock" FDAUTO.BAT in T2402. Great idea. They can defiantly use

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Interim Build T2402

Hi Eric, > On Feb 1, 2024, at 9:32 AM, Eric Auer via Freedos-devel > wrote: > > > Hi Jerome, thanks for the updates! :-) > >> The FreeDOS Interim Test Build T2402 for February is now available for >> download at: >> https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/

[Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Interim Build T2402

The FreeDOS Interim Test Build T2402 for February is now available for download at: https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/test/ Changes since T2401: 2024-02-01 05:49:48 upx

Re: [Freedos-devel] Next FreeDOS virtual get-together

's three > Sundays from now. > > Time is 11am to noon US/Central, same time as always. And we'll > probably go over that, because we always do. :-) > > > Jim Did you decide on the new conferencing software? Jerome ___ Freedos-devel

[Freedos-devel] Bug: SET /E

. For example: echo one | set /p TEST= | echo two Outputs two and stores one in the TEST variable. (Note: not redirecting input to SET when using /P will cause the system to wait on a carriage return from the console. That is expected behavior.) Jerome

[Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Interim Build T2401

other significant or package updates in T2401. Jerome ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Re: [Freedos-devel] Learning DOS assembly programming

ents. I would not advise studying it to learn assembly.) This kind of makes me want to write a series of videos on writing assembly for DOS using NASM. Starting with the very basics on up through advanced topics. :-) Jerome > > ___ &

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Interim Build T2312

Minor correction in T2312 notice email... > On Dec 2, 2023, at 3:58 PM, Jerome Shidel via Freedos-devel > wrote: > > Hi All, > > The FreeDOS Interim Test Build T2312 for December is now available for > download at: > > https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/

[Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Interim Build T2312

rt Van Waelvelde): Create fdisk.nl 2023-11-01 06:08:38 dojs (shidel): Updated to version 1.11.0 :-) Jerome ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Re: [Freedos-devel] Question about JEMM license

someone could spend the time updating the comments and removing the registration stuff. Or, us it in another project. It would probably be a good idea to clear up any possible confusion with the code’s license. :-) Jerome ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Re: [Freedos-devel] Question about USBDOS license

Hi Bret, > [..] >> I see the point with item 5. However, the mention of a "..directly >> from a web site that charges a 'registration fee'.." seems (to me) to >> be specific to sites that charge a mandatory fee to access files. > > That is correct. Voluntary donations to a website owner are

[Freedos-devel] Monthly Get-together

Hi all, Is there a FreeDOS online get-together today (Sunday 11/26/2023)? Jerome ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Re: [Freedos-devel] special old DOS software looking for a place online

age or provided with the OS. Just email me a zip with everything in it and I’ll put it up there. If there is anything else you’d like up there, just let me know. :-) Jerome > > ___ > Freedos-devel mailing lis

[Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Interim Build T2311

The FreeDOS Interim Test Build T2311 for November is now available for download at: https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/test/ <https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/test/> :-)

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Interim Build T2310 - no free space on CD

’t matter. But for some, they are configured for specific locations. A simple unzip, will result in files not being where they are expected. Using command line package managers like FDNPKG and FDINST instead of unzip will help prevent such configuration issues. They perform th

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Interim Build T2310

Hi Jim,On Oct 1, 2023, at 5:06 PM, Jim Hall via Freedos-devel wrote:I want to compile some things using IA-16 GCC in the new Interim BuildT2310, but neither the LiveCD or BonusCD have the DJGPP Environmentpackage on it. We had this on previous FreeDOS installs; to compilewith IA-16 GCC, you need

[Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Interim Build T2310

files via upload 2023-08-27 14:27:59 fdisk [unstable] (Bernd Boeckmann): version 1.3.9 2023-08-12 14:40:00 upx (shidel): updated to v4.1.0 2023-08-12 14:02:46 spool (shidel): added compiled version of BUFFERP.COM :-) Jerome ___ Freedos-devel mailing

Re: [Freedos-devel] Interim Build Delayed

is almost over, there is little reason to provide a T2309 build now. So, I’m just going to skip it. We should be good for providing the T2310 Interim Build at the start of October in a few days. Jerome ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.source

Re: [Freedos-devel] Ré : unstable should be build from unstable branch

Hi, > On Sep 17, 2023, at 10:56 AM, Paul Dufresne via Freedos-devel > wrote: > >  > Rereading dates on: > http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/repositories/unstable/devel/ > most packages are not very recent... ldegug is... upx from this year, but > other relatively old. >

Re: [Freedos-devel] Interim Build Delayed

t to figuring out why the RBE is not excluding the LNG file like it is told (probably file name case, dir or something simple), it will fit in the small floppy. But… Compression help files would probably be a good thing as well. Jerome > >> On 01.09.2023 16:49, Jerome Shidel via Freedos-dev

[Freedos-devel] Interim Build Delayed

the problem. I will get to it as soon as I can. But, probably not for several days. Jerome ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Re: [Freedos-devel] Updating/moving the wiki

> On Aug 26, 2023, at 4:40 PM, Bernd Böckmann via Freedos-devel > wrote: > > On 26.08.2023 17:48, Jerome Shidel via Freedos-devel wrote: >> Would require manually glueing an index together of the projects with Wikis >> under a main “landing page” which could

Re: [Freedos-devel] Updating/moving the wiki

;wiki" >>> links on www.freedos.org to point to the new wiki.freedos.org website. >>> I can add new wiki editors at that time, and probably set up a "self >>> service" feature so folks can create their own wiki accounts (would >>> need to look at

Re: [Freedos-devel] CD-ROMs was ANSI for DOS

> On Aug 3, 2023, at 3:57 PM, Ralf Quint via Freedos-devel > wrote: > > On 8/3/2023 11:54 AM, Jerome Shidel via Freedos-devel wrote: >> >>> On Aug 3, 2023, at 12:37 PM, Bret Johnson via Freedos-devel >>> wrote: >>> >>>  >>>

Re: [Freedos-devel] ANSI for DOS

few discs nowadays. Mostly use USB HDDs and Flash. Probably only about 1/3 the way through a stack of blank DVD-Rs I bought a decade ago. None of this really matters. We do not have open source drivers available to FreeDOS that we will provide CD support on sub-386 machines. :-) Jerome &g

Re: [Freedos-devel] ANSI for DOS

> On Aug 2, 2023, at 3:05 PM, Rugxulo via Freedos-devel > wrote: > > Hi, > >> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 2:29 AM Paul Edwards via Freedos-devel >> wrote: >> >>> FreeDOS should run on 8086, both kernel and shell. If it doesn't, >>> that's a bug or omission. >> >> Are you sure? I thought I was

Re: [Freedos-devel] tree 3.7.2/3.7.1

of not testing if the call was completed successful. See https://fd.lod.bz/rbil/interrup/dos_kernel/2169.html#3212 <https://fd.lod.bz/rbil/interrup/dos_kernel/2169.html#3212> :-) Jerome > On Aug 2, 2023, at 12:09 PM, perditionc--- via Freedos-devel > wrote: >

[Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Interim Build T2308

The FreeDOS Interim Test Build T2308 for August is now available for download at: https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/test/ Summary of changes since T2307: 2023-07-25 16:57:18

[Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Interim Build T2307

Hi All, The FreeDOS Interim Test Build T2307 for July is now available for download at: https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/test/ :-)

Re: [Freedos-devel] format \s

disk space and would be an enormous DOS program. Personally, I think you should just go with a single larger compressed "ready to go” image and not worry about it much. :-) Jerome ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Re: [Freedos-devel] Reminder: FreeDOS virtual get-together on June 18

Hmmm, that will be a little later today. :-) > On Jun 4, 2023, at 4:15 PM, Jim Hall wrote: > > Hi everyone! > > I wanted to share a reminder that our next FreeDOS virtual > get-together is coming up on Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 11am US/Central. > That's two weeks from today. > > We alternate

[Freedos-devel] VTEST

s. For example, any file is older than DT. Or, possibly File A is older than File B, etc. However, not sure how much use it would be. Maybe later. On a single floppy system, running “VTEST /d a:\ /and /d b:\” will cause DOS to prompt for a disk swap.

Re: [Freedos-devel] EXIST NUL

It 64-bit numbers, long file names and even both case-specific and case-less string comparisons. All that is working great and it will be available for general testing sometime over the next few days. If I can spare a few minutes, possibly tomorrow. If you are interested, the help text f

[Freedos-devel] FreeDOS & LOGGER

up a Live Environment that has LOGGER running. The example floppy can be retrieved from https://fd.lod.bz/redist/system/ <https://fd.lod.bz/redist/system/> Jerome ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS T2306

e have been put off indefinitely. It is unfortunate. But, it is what it is. Jerome ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Re: [Freedos-devel] EXIST NUL

Hi Ralf, To further prove Issue #1 is a bug under both the current version of FreeDOS and last version of MS-DOS (6.22), I booted up a Windows 10 machine and opened a command shell window. On that machine, drive Z: is a CDROM (with disk inserted) and drive T: does not exist. C:>if exist

Re: [Freedos-devel] EXIST NUL

e exists on a CD or Network share does work as expected. IF EXIST N:\TOOLS\MYTOOL.EXE SET PATH=N:\TOOLS;%PATH% That would add the N:\TOOLS path if MYTOOL.EXE is present in that directory. :-) Jerome > Ralf > ___

[Freedos-devel] EXIST NUL

> that I will just copy/paste here. Additional testing would be required to determine the cause of these problems. Since the same problem exists for Issue #1 under MS-DOS, an argument could be made to not fix that problem. As for Issue #2, it is a FreeDOS specific bug and will need fixed.

[Freedos-devel] FreeDOS T2306

Hi All, The FreeDOS Interim Test Build T2306 for June is now available for download at: https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/test/ :-)

Re: [Freedos-devel] I want my 10K

ssues, I’ll stop loading it at boot. Side Note: At boot, the system transfers the main OS files over to RAM disk, reconfigures the environment accordingly and primarily runs from RAM. Much better performance. A lot less wear and tear on 25+ year old drives. Besides,

[Freedos-devel] Logger

Hi All, Logger is now out of BETA. Version 1.00 is now available. https://fd.lod.bz/repos/current/pkg-html/logger.html :-) Jerome___ Freedos-devel mailing list

Re: [Freedos-devel] I want my 10K

that machine. It doesn’t even show up with MEM. Although it would be a lot of work and probably never happen, it is not an impossible task. :-) Jerome > > > ___ > Freedos-devel mailing list > Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

[Freedos-devel] I want my 10K

mostly, I think it would look really cool to have all Zeros in the Conventional Memory Column. :-) Jerome ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

[Freedos-devel] Logger v0.4-BETA

Hi All, I just released Logger v0.4-BETA. https://fd.lod.bz/repos/current/pkg-html/logger.html Plus, an update demo boot disk image. https://fd.lod.bz/redist/system/ This is the final BETA version.

Re: [Freedos-devel] Logger v0.3-BETA

s I’ll probably do a little more testing, maybe make a couple minor tweaks and fix any bugs if discovered. Most likely, release version 1.0 on Friday. :-) Jerome ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.source

[Freedos-devel] Logger v0.3-BETA

not be an additional beta before the 1.0 release. :-) Jerome ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

[Freedos-devel] Logger v0.2-BETA

ot had a chance to check out the demonstration boot floppy diskette, you should give it a whirl. It can be used to boot the LiveCD from FreeDOS 1.3 or any of the Interim Test Builds. https://fd.lod.bz/redist/system/ <https://fd.lod.bz/redist/system/> For all purposes, Logger is done for now.

Re: [Freedos-devel] Logger v0.1 (beta)

ssful” would be better. > > I would go with 01h or 00h. Let me look it up, ah yeah I am returning zero in > my debugger. [2] Since I plan on eventually supporting TSR mode, I’ll go with 0x01. Using 0x00, would make it "non-compliant". > [2]: https://hg.pushbx.org/ecm/ldebu

Re: [Freedos-devel] Logger v0.1 (beta)

earlier. It does not support >> reading the log. I think that would be of very limited use and most likely >> not worth the additional cost in memory to provide those functions. However, >> those may be added in future versions if there is enough demand for them. &

Re: [Freedos-devel] Logger

UPX and the tiny API demonstration programs, I don’t think compression of the dual-mode binary is as important at present. After all, the viewer could always be on a separate diskette if required. I do want to eventually compress the dual-mode binary as well. But for now, I think I’ll just put o

[Freedos-devel] Logger v0.1 (beta)

ike macOS and Linux. Oh, I also updated the Logger demo boot diskette image that can use either the LiveCD from FreeDOS 1.3 or any of the Interim Test Builds to start a Live Environment. https://fd.lod.bz/redist/system/ <https://fd.lod.bz/redist/system/&g

[Freedos-devel] FreeDOS T2305

Hi All, The FreeDOS Interim Test Build T2305 for May is now available for download at: https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/test/ :-)

Re: [Freedos-devel] LOGGER - Just because: why not

-sample.html <https://fd.lod.bz/logger-sample.html> :-) Jerome > On Apr 26, 2023, at 5:31 AM, jer...@shidel.net wrote: > > Hi All, > > As I mentioned previously, LOGGER can log both in monochrome and color. Along > with the built in viewer, the log could be printe

Re: [Freedos-devel] Logger

ry version. But, I think all that stuff is better suited for a post 1.0 version. I don’t want the initial release to suffer from feature creep and be put off for months or indefinitely. :-) Jerome ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

[Freedos-devel] Logger

ting. Too be fair, I was expecting just a crash and not an error. :-) Jerome ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

[Freedos-devel] LOGGER - Just because: why not

tps://fd.lod.bz/repos/current/pkg-html/logger-sample.html> or, download and try for yourself https://fd.lod.bz/repos/current/pkg-html/logger.html <https://fd.lod.bz/repos/current/pkg-html/logger.html> Oh BTW, I also added support for VESA mode changes as well.

Re: [Freedos-devel] Extension proposal

ce to read, write and control the logging driver. But, I don’t know if that is really worth doing and would increase the resident footprint a lot. Maybe, I’ll hold off on that until version 2. Once that stuff is done, it will be time for the BETA version. > [..] >> If it is made "fully compliant” with the AMIS protocol, it will add a >> minimum of 22 more bytes. Most likely, it will eventually be double or >> triple that. There are advantages to using AMIS. But, it requires calling >> the interrupt 255 times to check every multiplexer. > > Up to 256 times, actually. Yup. 0xff=255, 0x00 thru 0xff=256. I saw the typo after I sent the message and knew someone would point it out. LOL > [..] > > In any case, thanks for your work! > > Regards, > ecm > You are welcome. It is not really work, I enjoy it. Thanks again for all the feedback. :-) Jerome ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Re: [Freedos-devel] Logger

lease. For version 1.x, I think it may be better to use the SYS+COM pair of binaries. I’m still undecided. :-) Jerome ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Re: [Freedos-devel] Extension proposal

search in previous versions. :-) Jerome ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Re: [Freedos-devel] Extension proposal

that comes with its own set of problems. Some blocks contain sub-blocks. The upper memory blocks may or may not be linked into the primary MCB chain. There are other aspects involving interaction between the Driver, Interface and Log that are also just “good enough for now” and will probably be ch

Re: [Freedos-devel] Extension proposal

ugh to preserve all > 16-bit GPRs and segregs? 386 registers? FPU registers, MMX, XMM, etc? You would only modify the registers required to test for the signature. If you don’t match, you don’t modify anything. If you do match, than you could modify whatever. This really is not

Re: [Freedos-devel] Extension proposal

Hi Eric, > On Apr 21, 2023, at 10:27 AM, Eric Auer wrote: > > > Hi Jerome, > > if you are worried about collisions, use AMIS int 2d. > Overhead is low and it is less crowded than MUX int 2f. > > RBIL was famous enough to make AMIS more widespread. FreeDOS

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >