Re: [Freedos-user] Over 4-GB for FreeDOS, Etc.

2009-08-14 Thread Eric Auer
Hi Jack, > Re: using memory over 4-GB in DOS, the best way to AVOID many new > "custom" programs is to raise the capacity of XMS drivers... > 1) A change to the XMS request which determines available memory, > with a change to the FreeDOS "MEM" program to display all such > memory. I b

Re: [Freedos-user] [Fwd: Full Screen Sized Screen-Dumps]

2009-08-14 Thread Eric Auer
Hi Robert, > ...program calculates and displays a graph on the screen. Okay I understand more of your problem in Ubuntu now... If you use lp in Linux or copy ... prn in dosemu, the latter will basically assume that you want to print a plain text document. Lp might also support postscript and ma

Re: [Freedos-user] [Fwd: Full Screen Sized Screen-Dumps]

2009-08-14 Thread Robert J. Thompson
Eric: Sorry for the delay in getting back to you (was in LA for week, then had a monitor failure. I tried to reproduce the problem. it did about the same thing although not exactly. Eric Auer wrote: Hi Bob, Some questions: Is that Fortran program running in DOS? The Fortran program is ru

Re: [Freedos-user] Over 4-GB for FreeDOS, Etc.

2009-08-14 Thread Jack
>> On 14-Aug-2009 21:18, Jack wrote: >> ... But, if we are to "cook up" a new scheme to handle memory beyond >> 4-GB, why limit it only for RAMdisk usage? If the XMS drivers/ >> handlers support such "large" memory, EVERYBODY could use it! > > yes, as long as older programs don't use it by accide

Re: [Freedos-user] Over 4-GB for FreeDOS, Etc.

2009-08-14 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Op 14-8-2009 21:18, Jack schreef: > This would work. But, if we are to "cook up" a new scheme to handle > memory beyond 4-GB, why limit it only for RAMdisk usage? If the XMS > drivers/handlers support such "large" memory, EVERYBODY could use it! > yes, as long as older programs don't use it b

Re: [Freedos-user] Over 4-GB for FreeDOS, Etc.

2009-08-14 Thread Jack
> On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:43:17 -0700, Bernd Blaauw wrote: > > I don't know if it's easier or harder to do, but maybe best approach is > twofold : > 1) First 4GB handled traditionally for programs, ramdisks, diskcaches >etc. > 2) Ramdisk driver that can handle all memory beyond 4GB and leaves

Re: [Freedos-user] Over 4-GB for FreeDOS, Etc.

2009-08-14 Thread Bret Johnson
I pretty much agree. I actually don't really need or even want access to even the full 4GB that a 32-bit CPU allows, but would like what's there to work correctly no matter how much memory there actually is. My newest computer came with 6GB (64-bit Vista), which I multi-boot to DOS. I had to

Re: [Freedos-user] Over 4-GB for FreeDOS, Etc.

2009-08-14 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Op 14-8-2009 20:17, Jack schreef: > Re: using memory over 4-GB in DOS, the best way to AVOID many new > I am assuming here that, to keep things "simple" and still-useful > for programs that cannot or will-not be upgraded, the XMS drivers > will all "behave" same-as-before for current XMS commands.

[Freedos-user] Over 4-GB for FreeDOS, Etc.

2009-08-14 Thread Jack
>> On 14-Aug-2009 13:13, MegaBrutal wrote: >> Who ever needs a 64-bit version of DOS, especially if you need >> to emulate an entire processor while achieving it? 32-bit is >> just fine. I don't know why would anyone switch to 64-bit for >> DOS since people don't even use the advantages out. Of

Re: [Freedos-user] USB for FreeDos

2009-08-14 Thread Bret Johnson
> Hi JVP, thanks for testing the Bret Johnson USB drivers :-) {snip} >> cd\usb >> usbuhci IRQ 11 DisableLegacySupport > > I assume the IRQ can also be set automatically? Yes, the IRQ is normally set automatically, either by the BIOS or by USBUHCI{L}. The reason JVP needed to change it was beca

Re: [Freedos-user] Whatever happened to freedos-32?

2009-08-14 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Op 14-8-2009 13:13, MegaBrutal schreef: > Who ever needs a 64-bit version of DOS, especially if you need to > emulate an entire processor while achieving it? > > 32-bit is just fine. I don't know why would anyone switch to 64-bit > for DOS, since people don't even use the advantages out. > > Of cou

Re: [Freedos-user] buggy djgpp with freedos.

2009-08-14 Thread Eric Auer
Hi, > installed freedos base on an old dell(ten years);installed djgpp with rhide; > acted very buggy and refused to compile > even a hello world; > rebooted with 'himem' option, and now it compiles and executes. However, I > then tried a larger program with eight > functions, and it too, compile

Re: [Freedos-user] USB for FreeDos

2009-08-14 Thread Eric Auer
Hi JVP, thanks for testing the Bret Johnson USB drivers :-) > ... usb mouse attached to my FreeBasic/FreeDos application > C:\Dos32\DosLFN.com > C:\Dos32\cwsdpmi.exe If you run cwsdpmi like that, it will probably not stay in RAM? Apps made with FreeBASIC will just load cwsdpmi themselves while

Re: [Freedos-user] Whatever happened to freedos-32?

2009-08-14 Thread MegaBrutal
2009/8/13 King InuYasha : > Remaking the FreeDOS kernel to be 32-bit might be rather significant, or > even to 64-bit, since we are starting to see quite a few 64-bit processors. > The only problem with a 64-bit FreeDOS kernel is figuring out how to deal > with 16-bit applications. I'd say the best