Thanks tons for your work Bernhard,
Out or curiosity - are these nightly builds based on FreeRDPmaster? I
couldn't see any tags with 2.0 on Github.
Also, do you plan to tag a 2.0 build for inclusion in Debian?
Best regards and thanks,
Niklas
On 11/01/16 10:45, Bernhard Miklautz wrote:
>
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:34:08PM +0100, Niklas Andersson wrote:
> Out or curiosity - are these nightly builds based on FreeRDPmaster? I
> couldn't see any tags with 2.0 on Github.
the nightly builds are based on master which is the base for 2.0.
> Also, do you plan to tag a 2.0 build
2015-12-18 16:50 GMT+01:00 Bernhard Miklautz
:
> For users and for testing we do have nightly pre-builds for some time:
>
> https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/wiki/PreBuilds
>
apt-get update
Err http://pub.freerdp.com freerdp-nightly/main i386 Packages
404
2016-01-11 8:55 GMT+01:00 Valerio Pachera :
>
>
> apt-get update
>
> Err http://pub.freerdp.com freerdp-nightly/main i386 Packages
> 404 Not Found [IP: 212.232.26.215 80]
>
> The repository
>
I was writing that the repository is not working right now.
I tried on a debian
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 08:56:44AM +0100, Valerio Pachera wrote:
> 2016-01-11 8:55 GMT+01:00 Valerio Pachera :
> > apt-get update
> >
> > Err http://pub.freerdp.com freerdp-nightly/main i386 Packages
> > 404 Not Found [IP: 212.232.26.215 80]
> >
> > The repository
> >
>
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 04:12:47PM +0100, Valerio Pachera wrote:
> Hi, I opned a bug report to point out that the last stable release is more
> than 2 years old and that many commit has been pushed since then.
> https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/issues/3008
.. there are multiple issues open
Hi, I opned a bug report to point out that the last stable release is more
than 2 years old and that many commit has been pushed since then.
https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/issues/3008
I hope this is the right place to talk about it.
Could you tell me why you dind't relase 1.2 release after
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Bernhard Miklautz
bernhard.mikla...@shacknet.at wrote:
@Otavio if I'm not mistaken you do use serial a lot could you provide some
information how one can
properly test it's functionality or do you even have some test list in place?
Yes; we can help with how
[mailto:marcandre.mor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 3:00 PM
To: brian mullan
Cc: freerdp-devel
Subject: Re: [Freerdp-devel] Stable release
Hi Brian,
This is a good idea. It is clear that many community members have come to
perceive things in ways that shouldn't be, and we need
Hi,
On 10/23/2013 06:26 AM, Jay Sorg wrote:
I'm concerned / confused about the future of FreeRDP.
It seems like there is too many restructuring / refactoring of the
source code that add no value.
All the documentation on
http://www.freerdp.com/api/
is out of date.
True. Have a look to
I'm sorry, you missed the point.
Jay
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Bernhard Miklautz
bmikla...@thinstuff.at wrote:
Hi,
On 10/23/2013 06:26 AM, Jay Sorg wrote:
I'm concerned / confused about the future of FreeRDP.
It seems like there is too many restructuring / refactoring of the
When we are talking about this, you mention Thinstuff.
What do I think?
I left rdesktop in Peter's control and Cendio took over.
I left FreeRDP is your control and Thinstuff took over.
You need to fix this!
Jay
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Marc-André Moreau
marcandre.mor...@gmail.com
Hi Jay,
first of I'm truthfully sorry how it went with xrdp. Even if I wasn't
directly involved I absolutely understand you and also think some not
really right choices were made.. Sorry for that.
That said,
On 10/23/2013 09:48 AM, Jay Sorg wrote:
What do I think?
I left rdesktop in Peter's
Hello folks,
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Bernhard Miklautz
bmikla...@thinstuff.at wrote:
first of I'm truthfully sorry how it went with xrdp. Even if I wasn't
directly involved I absolutely understand you and also think some not
really right choices were made.. Sorry for that.
I think
Hi Otavio,
I think you also need to take a step back and realize the following:
I have already acknowledged that you do bring valid points. It is not not a
good thing that certain features like serial, parallel and smartcard are
not as stable as they should be, and would definitely use a helping
Hi Jay,
There's nothing to fix as there has never been a takeover. Where did you
get that from?!
And honestly, the comparison with Cendio is very insulting, you know how I
feel about them.
FreeRDP remains under my control, Thinstuff is *not* taking control over
the FreeRDP project. If I were a
Hi Vic,
Thank you for your support, and you do summarize well the situation.
We have always been very inclusive of people's contributions and always
will be. As for enjoying the new code without complaining and fixing
problems which bother you, that's pretty much how this should be
approached.
Hi Arlo,
Thank you for your feedback, and you are right, it can be very hard to stay
in sync with the bleeding edge of FreeRDP. In this case, the stable branch
of FreeRDP may be better suited for you. If you base your work on the
stable branch, you won't be getting new features as as fast as they
Thanks Marc and Vic.
I'm only trying to explain why there are not as many contributors as there was.
When any project gets too close to any company you loose contributor.
We spent a lot of time switching to the Apache lincese but we allow
GPL like code from one company. Why?
Can other
I had a similar problem when I was using FreeRDP libraries in xrdp.
The API kept changing from day to day for things that add no value.
palette renamed to colorTable, then ColorTable
This breaks the API twice. What value was added?
The API needs to be a special place that one guy maintains and
Hi Jay,
I think you are living in a parallel universe, what is wrong with you? Come
on IRC more often and talk to us, you've lost touch with reality, seriously.
First, don't use GPL-like to refer to a license which has nothing to do
with the GPL. You know how I feel about the GPL and we're
Hi Otavio,
I understand the lack of a proper release cycle is an issue, but to solve
this I really need the help of the community. We've got a lot of people
doing an amazing job fixing bugs and backporting fixes to the stable-1.1
branch. The problem is that working on the release and fixing bugs
Developer
-Original Message-
From: Marc-André Moreau [mailto:marcandre.mor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 9:37 AM
To: Otavio Salvador
Cc: freerdp-devel
Subject: Re: [Freerdp-devel] Stable release
Hi Otavio,
I understand the lack of a proper release cycle is an issue
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 9:37 AM
To: Otavio Salvador
Cc: freerdp-devel
Subject: Re: [Freerdp-devel] Stable release
Hi Otavio,
I understand the lack of a proper release cycle is an issue, but to solve
this I really need the help of the community. We've got a lot of people
Hi Otavio,
as Marc-Andre already said we are short on time and man power.
Since the last release a lot of new features and clients where added,
the code base and functionality is growing.
One really big and hard problem we face is the complexity of RDP. It
ain't an easy job to test all
Hello Bernhard,
First I'd like to make clear it is not a criticism per si, but a
constructive critic.
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Bernhard Miklautz
bmikla...@thinstuff.at wrote:
as Marc-Andre already said we are short on time and man power.
Since the last release a lot of new features and
Hi Otavio,
I understand that this is constructive criticism, the issue is mostly with
the fact that one cannot realistically do what you suggest. Freezing master
is not an option, which is why we've made a stabilization branch: the code
there is simply stabilized over time with no breaking
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Marc-André Moreau
marcandre.mor...@gmail.com wrote:
I understand that this is constructive criticism, the issue is mostly with
the fact that one cannot realistically do what you suggest. Freezing master
is not an option, which is why we've made a stabilization
Hi Otavio,
You may not realize it, but the vast majority of the work I'm doing for
customers is upstream from the start, and this include bug fixes,
performance improvements, architectural fixes. The problem I think you have
is the features you care mostly about (serial, parallel, smartcard) are
Hi Otavio,
All of this being said, I actually do care about fixing serial, parallel
and smartcard. I'm quite happy to see Thinstuff's been putting some
resources on smartcard and serial recently, and that Nik who responded
earlier in this thread is now on IRC, ready to help. I think the most
Hello Marc-Andre,
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Marc-André Moreau
marcandre.mor...@gmail.com wrote:
All of this being said, I actually do care about fixing serial, parallel and
smartcard. I'm quite happy to see Thinstuff's been putting some resources on
smartcard and serial recently, and
I would like to express my concern too over the stability of FreeRDP.
It was much better a year ago.
I'm concerned / confused about the future of FreeRDP.
It seems like there is too many restructuring / refactoring of the
source code that add no value.
All the documentation on
32 matches
Mail list logo