smoking has associated health care costs?
Nick Thompson,
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On
Behalf Of Vladimyr Burachynsky
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 7:21 PM
To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group'
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] vol
Of course, that's the whole issue. Do we let faceless bureaucrats figure
these things out and impose burdensome regulations? Or do we let gangs of
rapacious attorneys sue for ruinous damages after the fact? Or is there
another way to force consideration of public good into decisions about
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Roger Critchlow r...@elf.org wrote:
Of course, that's the whole issue. Do we let faceless bureaucrats figure
these things out and impose burdensome regulations?
Yes, consistently.
Or do we let gangs of rapacious attorneys sue for ruinous damages after the
surgeon to feel
the pain of every incision he makes?
Nick
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf
Of Roger Critchlow
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 9:19 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] vol 93, issue 22
[mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] *On
Behalf Of *Roger Critchlow
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 29, 2011 9:19 AM
*To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
*Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] vol 93, issue 22
Of course, that's the whole issue. Do we let faceless bureaucrats figure
these things out
What the majority of people do IS the right thing. Wisdom of crowds and so on.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Douglas Roberts d...@parrot-farm.net wrote:
Geeze, Nick.
You can't make people do the right thing. People have to want to do the
right thing. People don't want to do the right
In the absence of a functioning moral compass, I suppose this is a workable
definition.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Sarbajit Roy sroy...@gmail.com wrote:
What the majority of people do IS the right thing. Wisdom of crowds and so
on.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Douglas Roberts
Panic over intangibles is the right thing? Promise?
On 3/29/11 11:30 AM, Douglas Roberts wrote:
In the absence of a functioning moral compass, I suppose this is a
workable definition.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Sarbajit Roy sroy...@gmail.com
mailto:sroy...@gmail.com wrote:
What
Good point, Carl. I really should have said, In the absence of a
functioning moral compass, and a modicum of intelligence...
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Carl Tollander c...@plektyx.com wrote:
Panic over intangibles is the right thing? Promise?
On 3/29/11 11:30 AM, Douglas Roberts
Of Sarbajit Roy
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 11:26 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] vol 93, issue 22
McAfee SiteAdvisor Warning
This e-mail message contains potentially unsafe links to these
sites:
friam.org
What the majority
...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com]
On Behalf
Of Sarbajit Roy
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 11:26 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] vol 93, issue 22
McAfee SiteAdvisor Warning
This e-mail message contains potentially unsafe links
Douglas Roberts wrote at 03/29/2011 09:33 AM:
People don't want to do the right thing.
There is no evidence for this conclusion.
--
glen e. p. ropella, 971-222-9095, http://tempusdictum.com
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Whatever you say, Glen.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:22 PM, glen e. p. ropella
g...@tempusdictum.comwrote:
Douglas Roberts wrote at 03/29/2011 09:33 AM:
People don't want to do the right thing.
There is no evidence for this conclusion.
--
glen e. p. ropella, 971-222-9095,
-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] *On
Behalf Of *Vladimyr Burachynsky
*Sent:* Thursday, March 24, 2011 7:21 PM
*To:* 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group'
*Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] vol 93, issue 22
It appears that your conclusion was made independent
It appears that your conclusion was made independent of the facts. Perhaps
your conclusion serves some unidentified agenda, could you explain who WE is
and how the PRICE TAG is adjusted to effect a specific end?
I ecall how the price of cigarettes in Canada was increased to reflect the
supposed
:)
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Vladimyr Burachynsky vbur...@shaw.cawrote:
It appears that your conclusion was made independent of the facts. Perhaps
your conclusion serves some unidentified agenda, could you explain who WE is
and how the PRICE TAG is adjusted to effect a specific end?
: [FRIAM] vol 93, issue 22
It appears that your conclusion was made independent of the facts. Perhaps
your conclusion serves some unidentified agenda, could you explain who WE is
and how the PRICE TAG is adjusted to effect a specific end?
I ecall how the price of cigarettes in Canada was increased
] vol 93, issue 22
It appears that your conclusion was made independent of the facts. Perhaps
your conclusion serves some unidentified agenda, could you explain who WE is
and how the PRICE TAG is adjusted to effect a specific end?
I ecall how the price of cigarettes in Canada was increased
[mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com
mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] *On Behalf Of *Vladimyr
Burachynsky
*Sent:* Thursday, March 24, 2011 7:21 PM
*To:* 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group'
*Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] vol 93, issue 22
It appears that your conclusion
?
Nick Thompson,
*From:* friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] *On
Behalf Of *Vladimyr Burachynsky
*Sent:* Thursday, March 24, 2011 7:21 PM
*To:* 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group'
*Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] vol 93, issue 22
It appears
*To:* 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group'
*Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] vol 93, issue 22
It appears that your conclusion was made independent of the
facts. Perhaps your conclusion serves some unidentified
agenda, could you explain who WE is and how the PRICE TAG
21 matches
Mail list logo
