On Jun 16, 2009, at 11:01 PM, MaGioZal wrote:
On 6/16/09 1:28 AM, Po-en Tsai at poen.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Or, like me, I would switch onto my Panther 10.3 partition,
running Firefox
2.04 to watch anything Flash based. It seems to work for me, and
Youtube works
fine like that.
Stephen Weber wrote:
I have a G3 600mhz iMac and runs bad on yourtube too. You need a
computer with a processor better than a G3 or a early G4. It's
because flash is a CPU hog.
Well that's fine, but my Pismo 400 runs Youtube well, way, better than
the Ti G4.
Stephen Weber
On Mon, Jun
On 16/06/2009, at 3:24 PM, nestamicky wrote:
Thanks for reading. It's my G4 Titanium 400Mhz. It's crap on any
video site, including Youtube. Trusty Pismo was not this horrible.
Now, Dan, would rpm save me here? I'm using both the latest---non
rpm--version of FF and Safari 3.x. Horrible
On Jun 15, 2009, at 10:44 PM, nestamicky wrote:
Well that's fine, but my Pismo 400 runs Youtube well, way, better
than the Ti G4.
Have you tried enabling Quartz Extreme on the TiBook? If not, it might
be worth a try, using PCI Extreme 3.1 from MacUpdate. It works fine
under 10.4.11 on
Kris Tilford wrote:
On Jun 15, 2009, at 10:30 PM, Stephen Weber wrote:
I have a G3 600mhz iMac and runs bad on yourtube too. You need a
computer with a processor better than a G3 or a early G4. It's
because flash is a CPU hog.
I've had some Pentium III PC laptops that were
On Jun 15, 2009, at 10:52 PM, nestamicky wrote:
I would think, being completely drunk, that a 1.58 ghz machine would
beat a P3 machine.
I may have misstated the PIII speed, I could never quite figure it
out? It's a Compaq Presario 1710 with a 1GHz CPU, and sometimes it
seemed to report
Wallace Adrian D'Alessio wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:24 PM, nestamickynestami...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for reading. It's my G4 Titanium 400Mhz. It's crap on any video site,
including Youtube. Trusty Pismo was not this horrible. Now, Dan, would rpm
save me here? I'm using both the
At 5:52 AM -0500 6/16/2009, Kris Tilford wrote:
On Jun 15, 2009, at 10:52 PM, nestamicky wrote:
I would think, being completely drunk, that a 1.58 ghz machine would
beat a P3 machine.
Adobe put a lot of work into making Flash look great under Windoze.
I think they've barely given it a
At 9:24 PM -0600 6/15/2009, nestamicky wrote:
G4 Titanium 400Mhz
Running 10.4 with 768 ram. Fully updated, except for the latest Safari.
It's crap on any video site, including Youtube.
Flash sucks, and it has gotten worse this past year. Ditto for the
more advanced codecs in QuickTime.
Now,
Dan H.264 I believe is the codec that Youtube uses for storing the files on
the server, not what plug in it's using to play the files on the web
browser.
Stephen Weber
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Dan dantear...@gmail.com wrote:
At 9:24 PM -0600 6/15/2009, nestamicky wrote:
G4 Titanium
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:44 PM, nestamickynestami...@gmail.com wrote:
Stephen Weber wrote:
I have a G3 600mhz iMac and runs bad on yourtube too. You need a computer
with a processor better than a G3 or a early G4. It's because flash is a
CPU hog.
Well that's fine, but my Pismo 400
fast on the MacBook and will even
improve once I get a new Airport Express or Extreme base station.
--- On Tue, 6/16/09, Dan dantear...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Dan dantear...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Horrible, horrible, horrible video
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2009
On 6/16/09 1:28 AM, Po-en Tsai at poen.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Or, like me, I would switch onto my Panther 10.3 partition, running Firefox
2.04 to watch anything Flash based. It seems to work for me, and Youtube works
fine like that.
Upgrading ram may help, with my iMac, I had 512mb ram, but
Thanks for reading. It's my G4 Titanium 400Mhz. It's crap on any video
site, including Youtube. Trusty Pismo was not this horrible. Now, Dan,
would rpm save me here? I'm using both the latest---non rpm--version of
FF and Safari 3.x. Horrible video, and by that is meant; very jerky.
Running
I have a G3 600mhz iMac and runs bad on yourtube too. You need a computer
with a processor better than a G3 or a early G4. It's because flash is a
CPU hog.
Stephen Weber
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:24 PM, nestamicky nestami...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for reading. It's my G4 Titanium
On Jun 15, 2009, at 10:30 PM, Stephen Weber wrote:
I have a G3 600mhz iMac and runs bad on yourtube too. You need a
computer with a processor better than a G3 or a early G4. It's
because flash is a CPU hog.
I've had some Pentium III PC laptops that were equivalent MHz to G3
and
On 6/16/09 1:08 AM, Wallace Adrian D'Alessio at fluxstrin...@gmail.com
wrote:
Assuming you need to stick with this machine my first suggestion is to
max the RAM.
You could also try adjusting caching if at all possible. You may also
have virtual memory turned on which I believe may account
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:14 AM, MaGioZalmagio...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/16/09 1:08 AM, Wallace Adrian D'Alessio at fluxstrin...@gmail.com
wrote:
Assuming you need to stick with this machine my first suggestion is to
max the RAM.
You could also try adjusting caching if at all possible.
Good.
I just tried to make a few copies.
Already failed 2 out of 3. Lots of wasted media. Dual-layer is a real
pain.
Mohamad
On Jun 15, 2009, at 8:30 PM, Stephen Weber wrote:
I have a G3 600mhz iMac and runs bad on yourtube too. You need a
computer with a processor better than a G3
On 6/16/09 2:46 AM, Wallace Adrian D'Alessio at fluxstrin...@gmail.com
wrote:
Because you fully download before playing I assume your connection is
perhaps dial-up.
No, it isn't -- it's a slow, 256kbps cable-modem connection...
Will the machine accept a full Gig of RAM?
Close to this --
20 matches
Mail list logo
