Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-03-06 Thread Greg Von Kuster
Hello Peter, On Feb 20, 2014, at 10:20 AM, Greg Von Kuster g...@bx.psu.edu wrote: On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Greg Von Kuster g...@bx.psu.edu wrote: Your installation recipe for mira attempts to download a

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-03-06 Thread Peter Cock
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Greg Von Kuster g...@bx.psu.edu wrote: On Feb 20, 2014, at 10:20 AM, Greg Von Kuster g...@bx.psu.edu wrote: On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: The BLAST+ packages have the same glitch in their fall-back (so I will

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-03-06 Thread Peter Cock
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Greg Von Kuster g...@bx.psu.edu wrote: On Feb 20, 2014, at 10:20 AM, Greg Von Kuster g...@bx.psu.edu wrote: On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote:

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-03-06 Thread Greg Von Kuster
Hi Peter, On Mar 6, 2014, at 1:07 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Greg Von Kuster g...@bx.psu.edu wrote: On Feb 20, 2014, at 10:20 AM, Greg Von Kuster g...@bx.psu.edu

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-02-21 Thread Dave Bouvier
Peter, The test result at 13:11:20 is due to me manually running the install and test framework to test the fabric replacement code I introduced. The test result at 16:16:58 is due to the repository preparation script running successfully at its scheduled time, initializing the tool test

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-02-21 Thread Dave Bouvier
Peter, Correction: I mistakenly thought your email was regarding a repository on the main tool shed, against which I manually ran the test framework. Now that I noticed that you're referring to a repository on the test tool shed, the 13:10 test result is because the test tool shed's test

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-02-20 Thread Peter Cock
, On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Greg Von Kuster g...@bx.psu.edu wrote: Hi Peter, On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Greg Von Kuster g...@bx.psu.edu wrote: In any case, we have a fix for out move_directory_files which Dave is now committing. So your tests should pass with tonight's run -

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-02-20 Thread Ross
if a tool failed we all really benefit from seeing as much as we can - as securely as we can. Can we safely expose them somewhere protected? On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.comwrote: , On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Greg Von Kuster g...@bx.psu.edu wrote:

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-02-20 Thread Peter Cock
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Greg Von Kuster g...@bx.psu.edu wrote: Your installation recipe for mira attempts to download a binary and if that fails, it echoes an error, but still performs set_environment

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-02-20 Thread Greg Von Kuster
Hi Peter, Regarding youyr previous question about why the more usefule log resutls are not returned for display in the Tool Shed, the reason is that our use of fabric's local command for installing tool dependnecies restricts us from bewing able to capture that information. We are currently

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-02-19 Thread Peter Cock
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Greg Von Kuster g...@bx.psu.edu wrote: Hi Peter, We'll try to get some time to look at your tool_dependencies.xml recipe as soon as possible. Greg Von Kuster Hi Greg, Overnight this has gone back to the previously observed missing data problem (e.g.

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-02-19 Thread Greg Von Kuster
Hello Peter, Please see below… On Feb 19, 2014, at 4:41 AM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Greg, Overnight this has gone back to the previously observed missing data problem (e.g. email of 4th Feb) - no test results at all:

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-02-19 Thread Peter Cock
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Greg Von Kuster g...@bx.psu.edu wrote: Hello Peter, Please see below... ... Your above email arrived in my inbox at 4:42 AM EST, and it looks like your repository in question was not yet tested. Ah. That would partly explain things - perhaps coupled with

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-02-19 Thread Greg Von Kuster
Hi Peter, Dave B and I just discovered that issue that causes your tests to fail. The problem lies with our current implementation supporting the move_directory_files action tag, which is used in your recipe. This tag ultimately uses Python's os.listdir via shutil.move. It turns out that

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-02-19 Thread Peter Cock
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Greg Von Kuster g...@bx.psu.edu wrote: Hi Peter, Dave B and I just discovered that issue that causes your tests to fail. The problem lies with our current implementation supporting the move_directory_files action tag, which is used in your recipe. This tag

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-02-19 Thread Greg Von Kuster
Hi Peter, On Feb 19, 2014, at 6:09 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Greg Von Kuster g...@bx.psu.edu wrote: Hi Peter, Dave B and I just discovered that issue that causes your tests to fail. The problem lies with our current implementation

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-02-18 Thread Peter Cock
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Greg Von Kuster g...@bx.psu.edu wrote: Hi Peter, It looks like you made some changes to your tool dependency recipe since the last test run. Yeah, the mira de novo test was missing

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-02-18 Thread Greg Von Kuster
Hi Peter, We'll try to get some time to look at your tool_dependencies.xml recipe as soon as possible. Greg Von Kuster On Feb 18, 2014, at 5:47 AM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Greg, Dave, RE: http://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/mira4_assembler Same as

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-02-18 Thread Peter Cock
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Greg Von Kuster g...@bx.psu.edu wrote: Hi Peter, We'll try to get some time to look at your tool_dependencies.xml recipe as soon as possible. Greg Von Kuster Great. Re: https://trello.com/c/HVGrShnC/60-tool-shed-should-test-installation-of-packages

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-02-17 Thread Peter Cock
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Greg Von Kuster g...@bx.psu.edu wrote: On Feb 3, 2014, at 7:01 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: Returning to the MIRA4 problem, I got a meaningful test failure which

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-02-17 Thread Greg Von Kuster
Hi Peter, It looks like you made some changes to your tool dependency recipe since the last test run. Dave B and I followed the latest revision of your recipe and manually installed it using

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-02-17 Thread Peter Cock
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Greg Von Kuster g...@bx.psu.edu wrote: Hi Peter, It looks like you made some changes to your tool dependency recipe since the last test run. Yeah, the mira de novo test was missing the test-data input files. But I didn't touch mirabait or the install XML

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-02-15 Thread Greg Von Kuster
Hi Peter, On Feb 3, 2014, at 7:01 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: Moreover there is a similar problem with the matching repository on the Test Tool Shed, http://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/blastxml_to_top_descr 2014-01-04 showing failed tests for

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-02-15 Thread Peter Cock
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Greg Von Kuster g...@bx.psu.edu wrote: Hi Peter, On Feb 3, 2014, at 7:01 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: Moreover there is a similar problem with the matching repository on the Test Tool Shed,

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-02-13 Thread Greg Von Kuster
Hi Peter, The following issue was corrected in change set https://bitbucket.org/galaxy/galaxy-central/commits/e3a4d4d813fdb8a34cfd6d596e0f4bbdb2d9e211 On Jan 29, 2014, at 12:55 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote:

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-02-04 Thread Greg Von Kuster
Hi Peter, I've created the following Trello card for this. I know what the problems are, but I won't have time to get fixes for them for a while. Please continue to reposrt issues you discover and I'll make sure to get fixes as soon as I get time.

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-02-04 Thread Greg Von Kuster
Hi Peter, I've created the following Trello card for this. I know what the problems are, but I won't have time to get fixes for them for a while. Please continue to reposrt issues you discover and I'll make sure to get fixes as soon as I get time.

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-02-03 Thread Peter Cock
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Greg Von Kuster g...@bx.psu.edu wrote: On Jan 29, 2014, at 1:18 PM, Greg Von Kuster g...@bx.psu.edu wrote: Peter wrote: http://toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/blastxml_to_top_descr 2014-01-29 missing blast_datatypes dependency (why?) 2014-01-28 showing

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-01-30 Thread Greg Von Kuster
Hi Peter, On Jan 29, 2014, at 1:18 PM, Greg Von Kuster g...@bx.psu.edu wrote: Hi Peter, http://toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/blastxml_to_top_descr 2014-01-29 missing blast_datatypes dependency (why?) 2014-01-28 showing failed tests for sambamba_filter (wrong tool) I'll have

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-01-30 Thread Peter Cock
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Greg Von Kuster g...@bx.psu.edu wrote: Hi Peter, On Jan 29, 2014, at 1:18 PM, Greg Von Kuster g...@bx.psu.edu wrote: Hi Peter, http://toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/blastxml_to_top_descr 2014-01-29 missing blast_datatypes dependency (why?)

[galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-01-29 Thread Peter Cock
Hi all, Are both the main and test Tool Sheds currently meant to be running nightly tests again? I've not really got back into Galaxy tool testing since Christmas. Most of my tools' test results look sensible, but there seem to be some issues still, e.g.

Re: [galaxy-dev] Nightly testing status on the (Test) Tool Shed

2014-01-29 Thread Greg Von Kuster
Hi Peter, On Jan 29, 2014, at 12:55 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi all, Are both the main and test Tool Sheds currently meant to be running nightly tests again? Yes I've not really got back into Galaxy tool testing since Christmas. Most of my tools' test results