+1 binding from me
> On 16 Mar 2017, at 19:56, Billie Rinaldi wrote:
>
> Here is my +1 binding from the PPMC vote.
>
> On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:15:40, Gour Saha wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> This is a call for a vote on the Apache Slider (incubating) release
>> 0.92.0-incubating.
The Apache Slider team is proud to announce Apache Slider incubation release
version 0.90.2-incubating
Apache Slider (incubating) is a YARN application which deploys existing
distributed applications on YARN,
monitors them, and makes them larger or smaller as desired - even while the
Subject: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.90.2-incubating
Hello,
Here are the results of the vote for releasing
Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.90.2-incubating-RC1
+1 votes: 4 (4 binding)
+0 votes: 0 (0 binding)
-1 votes: 0 (0 binding)
(and a +0.5 vote from Daniel
> On 5 Jan 2016, at 11:55, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
> Tentative +0.5
>
> License and Notice there, no binaries in src archive, digests match
>
> License count as follows:
> Apache License/2.0: 1196
> BSD 3-Clause License: 2
> License missing: 101 (see below)
> Python
One thing to try here is contribute all changes back to the original author(s),
at least as patch submissions, so giving them the option to incorporate it.
The usual benefits of single-source/limited-diff OSS codebases apply, it's good
community practise and stops your project unintentionally
My own vote, of course:
+1 (binding)
> On 4 Jan 2016, at 19:34, Steve Loughran <ste...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> This is a call for a vote on the Apache Slider (incubating) release
> 0.90.2-incubating.
>
> This release candidate, 0.90.2-incub
Hello,
This is a call for a vote on the Apache Slider (incubating) release
0.90.2-incubating.
This release candidate, 0.90.2-incubating-RC1 has successfully passed a vote
for a release
on the slider developer mailing list.
Vote thread:
On 2 Dec 2015, at 10:01, Tom White
> wrote:
The vote to accept Impala into the incubator has passed
(http://s.apache.org/u6r), however there are still some concerns about
CTR/RTC. My main takeaways from the CTR/RTC thread are that it's not a
Think I've missed the vote window, but
+1 binding
I will repeat what I raised when the proposal first came up, something that
wasn't addresses at all: ZeroMQ is LGPL, which is forbidden as a mandatory
dependency in ASF projects.
Step 1 of the project is going to have to confirm that the
This is really good essay on the whole topic. I don't think I've seen a post on
any asf list which uses both "existential threat" and "desiderata". I also like
the implication that RTC is a function of the complexity of the team, rather
than just the code. Every project I've worked on —open or
> On 22 Nov 2015, at 22:34, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>
> The major question here, for me, is: if the project is RTC, then why
> would I make an effort to become a committer if at the end of the day
> I'm still not trusted to know when to ask for review? It'd be less work
> to
> On 19 Nov 2015, at 02:28, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> 10], copyright Open Software Foundation e.g. [11]
That taints so much of the HP C++ codebase. Someone I know was working on the
unix JVM and was in the graphics code, where he came across bits of the font
stuff
> On 18 Nov 2015, at 13:34, Stephen Connolly
> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 18 November 2015, Emmanuel Lécharny
> wrote:
>
>> Le 18/11/15 11:31, Stephen Connolly a écrit :
>>> I believe the issue here is that with CTR it is very easy to miss
> On 16 Nov 2015, at 22:50, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
>> ...
>
>> 1) You're right, I don't trust anybody to make code changes to a complex
>> project with zero oversight. I currently work on a project that I
> On 16 Nov 2015, at 00:28, toki wrote:
>
>>
>> not about philosophy as different paths lead to the same mountain top
>
> Somebody failed Buddhist Logic 101. (Not all paths lead to the same
> mountain top, even if they appear to start at the base of the same
>
> On 13 Nov 2015, at 22:19, Matei Zaharia wrote:
>
> One question about this from the Spark side: have you considered giving the
> project a different name so that it doesn't sound like a Spark component?
> Right now "Spark Kernel" may be confused with "Spark Core"
> On 14 Nov 2015, at 12:47, moon soo Lee wrote:
>
> Hi forks,
>
> Apache Zeppelin community has voted on following RC to be releaseed
> as official Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.5-incubating release.
>
> Vote will be open for next 72 hours (close at 5am 17/Nov PDT).
>
> [
> On 11 Nov 2015, at 17:24, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/10/15, 12:31 PM, "Steve Loughran" <ste...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
>> * In any project where a significant number of the team members are
>> expected to ship
> On 11 Nov 2015, at 09:38, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Steve Loughran <ste...@hortonworks.com>
> wrote:
>> ...is JIRA-first development conducive to developing a community?.
This is an interesting topic, and one that is broader than just Apache Sentry
(incubating). Even so, I want to praise Joe Brockmeier for raising it, and the
comments -especially those from Greg Stein and Rich Bowen and Marvin Humphrey
for making me think more about this.
* In any project with
+1 (binding)
> On 28 Oct 2015, at 20:26, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> Following discussions [1] about its current status, the Groovy community
> has voted [2] to graduate from the Incubator. The vote passed [3] with 12 +1s
> total, 5 are binding:
>
>Guillaume Laforge
>
+1 binding.
The process I used for verifying this were covered in the slider -dev release
post, but essentially
Stage 1: verify POM dependencies
-checked out dependency checker at
https://github.com/steveloughran/slider-dependency-check
-updated slider dependency to 0.81.1-incubating
-mvn
On 12 Jul 2015, at 06:03, Sean Busbey bus...@cloudera.com wrote:
Hi Folks!
There's a community going through board resolution to move from within
Hadoop to form a new TLP named Yetus. Due to a request on a private list
we've made a incubator proposal summary of the project.
Proposal:
On 15 May 2015, at 01:42, Justin Mclean justinmcl...@me.com wrote:
Hi,
Seems OK but +0 until LICENSE issue explained/resolved.
I checked:
- File contains “incubating”
- Signatures and hashes correct
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE may some issues
- NOTICE correct
- all source has
On 14 May 2015, at 09:44, Justin Mclean justinmcl...@me.com wrote:
Hi,
Staged artifacts:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheslider-1006/org/apache/slider
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheslider-1006/org/apache/slider
It’s not
neo4j is just a remote app in this context, right? So there'll be no classpath
contamination?
in which case, I don't see why there'd be any worry about pulling in to the
test/release process. I think having neo4j maintain the artifact makes sense
from a maintenance/release process, tinkerpop
On 12 May 2015, at 22:08, Gour Saha gs...@hortonworks.com wrote:
This vote will be open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Thank You,
The Apache Slider Team
+1 (binding)
as stated in the slider list: downloaded source, built and
On 16 Apr 2015, at 09:32, Seetharam Venkatesh venkat...@innerzeal.com wrote:
@David, I have uploaded the source tar ball for your review at
http://people.apache.org/~venkatesh/atlas/ while I work on making the
repository public.
Thanks!
venkatesh
-how about creating your own
On 13 Apr 2015, at 06:39, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it is common to take a quick look at code coming in. In
particular, a glance to see whether there is any hygiene around licensing
is an important question. Many projects in the world at large have no good
record
would be good to get hold of groovy.codehaus.org. I was unable to find out
anything about using lists yesterday...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 23 Mar 2015, at 16:40, Gour Saha gs...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Hello,
This is a call for a vote for releasing Apache Slider 0.70.1-incubating.
This is a source+binary release with one .tar file (appdef_1.tar), which is a
text file used for -ve testing.
The following 2 issues were
On 14 Mar 2015, at 00:13, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org wrote:
Am 13.03.2015 22:38, schrieb Stephen Connolly:
(Disclosure Ben works for my employers, so I have slightly more ability to
bend his ear. As a result I got him to agree to do two full exports from
JIRA, one to let us test
On 13 Mar 2015, at 20:48, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
Well, Cédric raised the point about the release versioning schema during
incubation. I agree with him, that it would be strange to release Groovy
2.4.2 as Groovy 2.4.2-incubating. Do we need to talk about this?
It'll cause
On 11 Mar 2015, at 13:43, Gour Saha gs...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Hello,
This is a call for a vote for releasing Apache Slider 0.70.0-incubating.
This is a source+binary release with one .tar file (appdef_1.tar), which is a
text file used for -ve testing.
Summary of fixes:
After a quick email exchange with our mentors, I'm going to publish the
0.61.0-incubating release as voted through, with the 0.7x release process to
begin shortly —the latter to address all licensing inconsistencies in .py
dependencies.
Announcement to follow.
-Steve
passes with 4 +1 votes from IPMC.
Jean-Baptiste Onofré +1 (binding)
Jakob Homan +1 (binding)
Steve Loughran +1 (binding)
Billie Rinaldi +1 (binding)
-Steve
On 9 February 2015 at 14:02:49, Justin Mclean
(jus...@classsoftware.commailto:jus...@classsoftware.com) wrote:
HI,
Would it be OK if we addressed all of the issues in that release? You've
identified them, which will make checking them easy. And as we plan to get
that out by the end of
On 8 February 2015 at 22:57:05, Justin Mclean
(justinmcl...@me.commailto:justinmcl...@me.com) wrote:
Hi,
Sorry but it's -1 binding from me. Willing to change my vote if other incubator
members think these issues are OK for this release and/or corrective action is
taken for the next
On 9 February 2015 at 16:58:44, Marvin Humphrey
(mar...@rectangular.commailto:mar...@rectangular.com) wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com wrote:
On 8 February 2015 at 22:57:05, Justin Mclean
(justinmcl...@me.commailto:justinmcl...@me.com) wrote
I'm still looking for more votes here.
Here's my own:
+1 (binding)
On 3 February 2015 at 15:25:43, Steve Loughran
(ste...@hortonworks.commailto:ste...@hortonworks.com) wrote:
Hi all,
This is to call for a vote for releasing slider-0.61.0-incubating.
This is a source+binary release
Hi all,
This is to call for a vote for releasing slider-0.61.0-incubating.
This is a source+binary release, with the same actual source as the previous
slider-0.60.0-incubating release. We've done this for downstream projects;
once the release process is successfully reworked we'll use it in
+1 for the proposal: I've a lot of respect for the team...I met some of
them at a workshop in Germany a few years back along with the (then)
Stratosphere project.
I'm would volunteer as a mentor except I'm fairly overcommitted with other
things (like the slider incubating project). If it does
+1 (binding).
ship it!
On 2 December 2014 at 22:32, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a call for a vote on a release of Apache Samza 0.8.0
(incubating). This is the second Incubator release from the podling
and was voted on by the PPMC (result thread: http://s.apache.org/4gb,
+1 binding
On 18 November 2014 19:43, Josh Elser josh.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The Apache Slider project has voted to release 0.60.0-incubating. The team
voted to release these artifacts with 6 +1's and nothing else. 2 of the 6
votes were from IPMC members.
Vote thread:
[ ] +1 accept Lens in the Incubator
[ ] ±0
[ ] -1 because...
think you meant HTrace and not lens. Accordingly
+1, binding
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is
the code inside is all org.htrace; changing that would be painful for both
the developers and the current users
who owns htrace.org?
On 3 November 2014 19:27, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
Hi!
Thanks for the positive feedback and volunteering. I think the
more mentors the merrier
+1 (binding)
On 23 October 2014 01:30, Tomer Shiran tshi...@apache.org wrote:
I had the wrong link in here as well as non-Apache emails. Here's the
correct information.
Correct link to PPMC vote:
On 12 August 2014 08:52, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On 12 August 2014 08:53, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
Documents are source code written in a natural language :-)
and without any tests.
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the
On 7 July 2014 08:45, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Hitesh Shah hit...@apache.org wrote:
...15 binding +1s, another +1 from Abiola A Balogun ( possibly a spam
bot ) and no -1s...
you're right, spam bots don't get binding votes here ;-)
+1 binding
On 1 July 2014 05:16, Hitesh Shah hit...@apache.org wrote:
Hello folks
Tez entered incubation in February, 2013. Since then, we have made
progress towards graduation[1]. The Tez community recently voted positively
towards graduation[2] with 27 +1s.
Of the 27, there were 5 IPMC
+1 binding
On 29 June 2014 01:02, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote:
This is vote for Samza's 0.7.0 release. The PPMC vote passed 6x+1 6
(Martin, Jakob, Yan, Sriram, Zhijie, Garry):
http://bit.ly/samza070releasevote
The release candidate can be downloaded from here:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Marvin Humphrey
mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Steve Loughran
ste...@hortonworks.com
wrote:
On 10 June 2014 16:20, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
One fundamental problem with compiled deps
On 10 June 2014 16:20, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
One fundamental problem with compiled deps is that unlike source code, they
cannot be reviewed by a PMC -- so they are potential trojan horses. Maybe
it's possible to address that specific concern by compiling an ASF
The recent ASF mailing list changes appear to have broken some of the
reply-to's in mailing lists, going to things like
d...@slider.apache.org rather than d...@slider.incubator.apache.org
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7857
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7865
people
The ApacheCon EU call for papers is open, and will close June 25th, end of
the day in whatever timezone is latest.
http://events.linuxfoundation.org//events/apachecon-europe/program/cfp
http://apachecon.eu
@apachecon
The conference will take place in Budapest, Hungary, November 17 - 21, 2014.
On 29 May 2014 04:56, Sumit Mohanty smoha...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Thanks Justin.
I did miss the compilation instruction in the original email. The markdown
file is at
+1 (binding).
Ship it!
On 2 May 2014 04:03, Suresh Marru sma...@apache.org wrote:
Please VOTE to indicate if Apache Stratos is ready to graduate as a Top
Level Project. The board resolution is included below.
[ ] +1 Graduate Apache Stratos as a TLP
[ ] +0 Don't care.
[ ] -1 Don't
On 28 April 2014 19:19, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Congrats and welcome to ASF incubator guys!
Indeed! Best of luck growing your community and project!
Thanks,
Roman.
thx, I'll hope to submit
After the week's voting, here's the results.
Binding +1s:
Arun C Murthy
Suresh Srinivas
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Devaraj Das
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Jakob Homan
Non-binding +1s:
P. Taylor Goetz
larry mccay
On and after April 25:
Binding +1s:
Mahadev Konar
Non-binding +1s:
Dilli Arumugam
On 24 April 2014 07:47, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote:
+1 (binding)
As I said for Hoya, I'm in as a mentor if you need.
Regards
JB
thanks -I hope to be filing work against your name shortly
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the
I'd like to call a vote on accepting Slider into the incubator
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SliderProposal
[ ] +1 Accept Slider into the Incubator
[ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Slider
[ ] -1 Do not accept Slider because …
The vote will be open until Thursday April 24 13:00 UTC
On 12 April 2014 23:38, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org
wrote:
The reason I ask is I'm wondering how Slider differentiates from
projects
like Apache Twill or Apache Bigtop that are already existing vehicles
for
On 14 April 2014 04:43, Andreas Neumann a...@apache.org wrote:
I'd like to comment on what has been said about Twill.
Twill: handles all the AM logic for running new code packaged as a JAR
with
an executor method
The goal of Twill is much broader than to support writing new code. Its
On 10 April 2014 16:28, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Steve,
Does Slider target the deployment and management of components/projects in
the Hadoop project itself? Not just the ecosystem examples mentioned in the
proposal? I don't see this mentioned in the proposal.
no.
That
Hi
For people wondering what's been happening with that Hoya proposal, I've
got a successor proposal up for discussion.
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SliderProposal
This proposal -as well as having a different name- is a superset of the
original draft. It emphasises that making the tool
to move forward with the
proposal at this point or are you still mulling over the feedback?
Thanks,
Roman.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com
wrote:
I'm starting to put together the incubation proposal for Hoya: a tool to
dynamically deploy applications
looks nice.
5. Help migrate more distributed applications into YARN clusters - such
as Apache HAMA.
BTW, this means that HAMA can be deployed on YARN cluster using HOYA
without implement separate YARN application?
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com
wrote
to address it as
it
provides a set of simple and useful tools.
For the sake of the names I think Hoya would be good (while Hyena would
not).
Just my 0.02 cents,
Tommaso
2014/1/17 Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com
On 16 January 2014 12:41, Tommaso Teofili
On 16 January 2014 12:41, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
@Steve I'm curious to know if also Apache Hama may leverage Hoya to be
deployed on YARN.
If you are going to make a 100% commit to running in YARN -which, if you
aren't ready yet, Hama should be able to do in
Andreas, to me, Twill is a library, a convenience library, that one
can use to write Yarn apps. Hoya aims to provide a general framework
using which one can take existing apps (HBase/Accumulo to start with),
and make them run well in a Yarn cluster, without intruding at all
into the App
On 17 January 2014 10:10, Bernd Fondermann bernd.fonderm...@gmail.comwrote:
Very informative explanation. I've got a better understanding of the
proposal now.
I suggest that a remark like this is added to the Hoya proposal, so this
part of the discussion becomes part of the vote on the
On 15 January 2014 02:13, Andreas Neumann a...@apache.org wrote:
I see. So is Hoya limited to HBase and Accumulo? Or is it open for any
other type of existing application? If so, won't it have some common
abstraction that is shared by all of them? That is where I see the
similarity with
? Is there opportunity for collaboration, perhaps
cross-contributing or even converging the two projects?
-Andreas.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com
wrote:
I'm starting to put together the incubation proposal for Hoya: a tool to
dynamically deploy applications
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
On 13/01/14 20:25, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Steve Loughran
ste...@hortonworks.com
wrote:
...What
On 9 January 2014 21:55, Enis Söztutar enis@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal looks good. Let me know if you need any additional help in
mentors.
Enis
+1 -I'd really like input from the HBase and Accumulo teams as they are the
first apps we're trying to work with.
On that note, I know we've
On 10 January 2014 09:54, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote:
Hi Steve,
can I help during the week end ?
Regards
JB
I'm just running the post-rename tests now; functional test runner came
first...
-steve
On 01/10/2014 10:31 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
I'm going to do
t...@cloudera.com
wrote:
Mmmh, if i recall correctly this has come up in the past with other
projects and it was decided against it. Could you please check with the
hadoop folks about it?
Thx
On Jan 9, 2014, at 1:19 AM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com
wrote:
no its
, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com
wrote:
I'm starting to put together the incubation proposal for Hoya: a tool to
dynamically deploy applications such as HBase or Accumulo on YARN
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HoyaProposal
It does already work to the extent that it can bring up
interesting work together with other
projects.
I would be please to be mentor on Hoya.
Regards
JB
On 01/08/2014 04:08 PM, Steve Loughran wrote:
I'm starting to put together the incubation proposal for Hoya: a tool to
dynamically deploy applications such as HBase or Accumulo on YARN
I'm starting to put together the incubation proposal for Hoya: a tool to
dynamically deploy applications such as HBase or Accumulo on YARN
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HoyaProposal
It does already work to the extent that it can bring up either application,
run different clusters of
Hi,,
I want to start a proposal for incubating my Hoya work. Can I have edit
permissions for SteveLoughran?
TIA,
steve
+1 ship it (binding)
On 17 September 2013 23:29, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
We've held a vote on drill-dev to release the first milestone release.
The vote thread can be found here:
On 22 April 2013 15:39, Rebecca Wood silky...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am calling a VOTE for acceptance of jclouds into the Apache Incubator.
The vote will close on Monday, April 29, 2013.
[ ] +1 Accept jclouds into the Apache Incubator.
[ ] +0 Don't care.
[ ] -1 Don't accept
On 28 February 2013 18:11, Hyunsik Choi hyun...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Tajo into the Apache incubator.
The vote will close on Mar 7 at 6:00 PM (PST).
[X] +1 Accept Tajo into the Apache incubator
[] +0 Don't care.
[] -1 Don't accept Tajo into
On 27 February 2013 18:53, Andrei Savu savu.and...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Benson -
Thanks for your feedback! It's too early to decide if there is an overlap
between communities. Provisionr solves a different problem being focused on
semi-automated workflows (e.g. with Rundeck) and cloud
+1, binding
On 6 November 2012 16:57, Adam Berry ambe...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Hello,
This proposal has been open for discussion for a a few weeks, so now
submitting for a vote for this project to be accepted into the incubator.
Cheers,
Adam Berry
On 10 August 2012 16:12, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.com wrote:
This is a call for vote to graduate Oozie podling from Apache Incubator.
Oozie entered the Incubator in July of 2011. Since then it has added
two new committers and made two significant releases following the ASF
policies
On 31 May 2012 07:18, Seungyoung Kim wolky...@gmail.com wrote:
XML and JSON format is another one which are used wided, but little bit
too complecated and heavy from application's stand point of view.
I'd agree with this critique of XML, but not JSON. Easy to yacc-up a
parser, a fair number
On 26 May 2012 21:50, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Steve Loughran
steve.lough...@gmail.com wrote:
It is becoming a bit of a SPOF, isn't it?
What has changed about our JIRA instance is both its size and its
increasing
integration
On 27 May 2012 00:43, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
arvind - 116 commits - Cloudera
prasadm - 22 commits - Cloudera
brock - 16 commits - Cloudera
esammer - 4 commits - Cloudera
jarcec - 1 commit - AVG Technologies
juhanic - 1 commit -
On 27 May 2012 01:15, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
What would happen if all the Cloudera people were to suddenly vanish from
the project (this could easily happen if Cloudera were purchased by a
larger company who had different goals). As it stands today I don't
believe the
On 23 May 2012 19:45, Josh Wills jwi...@cloudera.com wrote:
I would like to call a vote for accepting Apache Crunch for
incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available
below. We ask the Incubator PMC to sponsor it, with phunt as
Champion, and phunt, tomwhite, and acmurthy
On 25 May 2012 20:00, Josh Wills jwi...@cloudera.com wrote:
Hi Steve,
Thank you for your thoughtful comments. Replies inlined below.
1. He's using it at work, so represents the end users.
A super-majority of the initial committers are also end users. I use
Crunch on my own projects
On 23 May 2012 19:35, Josh Wills jwi...@cloudera.com wrote:
Hey Jakob,
This was a tough one-- you know that I've been talking about Crunch
w/Joe Adler for a few weeks now, and I personally am really looking
forward to working with you guys. That said, the team did feel
strongly about
On 24 May 2012 07:44, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
To me that seems like it raises a barrier to entry -- but then,
there are numerous projects around the ASF who are not hurting for
contributors and who use JIRA for *everything* -- starting with Hadoop and
Lucene.
I first
On 24 May 2012 06:15, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I've met other groups of people who like a JIRA centric view
of the world. I suspect that if they did a bunch of other good things
called out below, you or others would find the JIRA business
digestible. Also, on the other
On 4 May 2012 16:34, Alan Gates ga...@hortonworks.com wrote:
* In that case there might still be a role for BigTop to provide a
central repository for such easily consumable upstream releases. This
would be somewhat similar to the discussions that took place a few
years ago about whether
[X ] +1 Hama graduation
Binding.
-Steve
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On 20/01/12 06:46, Eric Yang wrote:
Still missing one IPMC vote. Could someone help out?
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 04/09/11 17:39, Billie J Rinaldi wrote:
Bernd,
We would divide the derived code into two categories: that which we modified only slightly (for
example to allow us to extend it) and that which we modified heavily. Now that we are able to
interact openly, we hope to supply much of that back
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo