Hi,
As part of Cactus, we have developed 2 Eclipse plugins. One of them is a
generic webapp plugin. We would like to extract this from the Cactus CVS
and let others benefit from it.
However, I'm not sure where we should put this new project.
Obviously one choice is to put it on SourceForge.
Pier, this is great! I would be happy to use newsgroup instead of emails
but I have 2 questions:
- how fresh are the messages in the newsgroup? It seems there is a few
hours delay between emails and newsgroup. That makes it difficult to use
newsgroup in replacement of emails, don't you think?
-
-Original Message-
From: Howard M. Lewis Ship [mailto:hlship;attbi.com]
Sent: 20 October 2002 14:36
To: Jakarta General List
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Tapestry joins Jakarta
I don't have a way to qualify this, but I'm very concerned about
growing
the
community, and therefore I'm
... ;-)
That said, I only wish to learn and I would love to know some more
tricks from you!
Thanks
-Vincent
-Andy
On Sun, 2002-10-20 at 10:23, Vincent Massol wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Howard M. Lewis Ship [mailto:hlship;attbi.com]
Sent: 20 October 2002 14:36
To: Jakarta
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:bayard;generationjava.com]
Sent: 20 October 2002 20:36
To: Jakarta General List
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Is Cactus successful (was RE: [PROPOSAL] Tapestry joins
Jakarta)
On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Vincent Massol wrote
-Original Message-
From: Andrew C. Oliver [mailto:acoliver;apache.org]
Sent: 20 October 2002 18:32
To: 'Jakarta General List'
Subject: Re: Is Cactus successful (was RE: [PROPOSAL] Tapestry joins
Jakarta)
Just FYI, you have failed to provide sufficient outside-of-jakarta
-Original Message-
From: Andrew C. Oliver [mailto:acoliver;apache.org]
Sent: 20 October 2002 19:03
To: Vincent Massol
Cc: 'Jakarta General List'
Subject: RE: Is Cactus successful (was RE: [PROPOSAL] Tapestry joins
Jakarta)
I'm sorry to have insulted you. I was only trying
IAS,
That's great news! I'll add the link the Cactus web site. I'll also try
to commit or get your stylebook patch committed (I'm not a committer on
xml-stylebook ATM). Who can help here?
Thanks,
-Vincent
-Original Message-
From: IAS master [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13
by day
time vs night time people?
I am curious how much truth there might be to the question, do
companies
/groups drive jakarta or do individuals? Or to what degree either may
be true.
-Ellis
Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi,
A week ago, I have sent an email to all Apache committers. I
Un saludo,
Alex.
-Mensaje original-
De: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: viernes 20 de septiembre de 2002 9:55
Para: 'Jakarta General List'
Asunto: RE: [Poll result] Committers, who are we?
Hi Ellis,
I've just compiled the result to answer your
site,
so that others can get a feeling of what to expect and what kind of
persons the existing committers are. For jakarta, we could put a link to
that page on http://jakarta.apache.org/site/whoweare.html
Comments?
Thanks
-Vincent
___
Vincent Massol
Managing Director
OCTO
To: Vincent Massol (E-mail)
Subject: Together ControlCenter for jakarta projects
Hi Vincent,
I am just persuing the Together ControlCenter licence issue for you.
I am proposing that TogetherSoft gives the Jakarta Project an
academic
licence, and that all the committers be considered
? How are other projects doing this ?
Thanks
-Vincent
___
Vincent Massol
OCTO Technology UK Ltd
www.octo.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: (020) 8996 9540
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:34, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi,
I have always been pondering how to best manage the following.
Should
there be 2 web sites per project : one for the latest release
(containing docs + javadoc corresponding to the latest release) and
one
for nightly builds (containing
I have 2 questions :
1/ Now that we are in 2002, do we need to change the text in all our
license files to be : Copyright (c) 1999-2002 The Apache Software
Foundation instead of Copyright (c) 1999-2001 The Apache Software
Foundation ?
2/ Some license files only have Copyright (c) 1999 The
What would be nice would be to have a JJAR/CJAN project coupled with
GUMP. This application would have both an Ant task (for developers) to
retrieve versions of dependent jars (latest or specified version or
date) and a GUI/Applet in the download area so that end user could use
it to download
containing all the needed tasks/dependent
jars to build the Cactus project / run Cactus tests in a project, using
Ant. We also package the dependent jars in the release and nightly
builds.
-Vincent
-Ted.
Vincent Massol wrote:
What would be nice would be to have a JJAR/CJAN project
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 January 2002 19:24
To: Jakarta General List
Subject: Re: Just the JARs
On 1/1/02 12:57 PM, Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would be nice would be to have a JJAR/CJAN project coupled
You should also have a look at the jjar project in Jakarta Commons and also
the related discussion threads on jakarta-commons on the subject. There are
some common ideas :)
-Vincent
- Original Message -
From: Danny Angus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
You're ready to preach the GUMP way ... ;-)
In other words : no project is allowed to store external jars in CVS. GUMP
runs everyday with latest versions of everything. Integration problems are
fixed when the arise instead of being pushed back to later. The emphasis
should be on the
Hi,
I have sent 5 mails to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
yesterday and they have not yet appeared on the list (after more than 15
hours). Is there any problem currently with the jakarta mail server ?
Thanks
-Vincent
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
] Pierpaolo Fumagalli
[+1]Ted Husted
[ ] Ceki Gülcü
[+1] Geir Magnusson Jr.
[ ] Vincent Massol
[+1] Craig McClanahan
[+1] Sam Ruby
[+1] Daniel Savarese
[+1] Jon Stevens
[+1] Jason van Zyl
This gives us the 3/4 PMC approval rating so I believe BCEL will be moving
to Jakarta unless Ceki
- Original Message -
From: Bob Tanner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 11:49 PM
Subject: cvs export problems?
$ cvs export -d jakarta-cactus -D now jakarta-cactus
cvs export: Updating jakarta-cactus
U jakarta-cactus/.cvsignore
U
We can quickly change it for Cactus. However this means that Cactus users
will have to use JUnit 3.7 from now on ...But I guess it had to happen,
someday and it's a normal event. I'll make the change.
Thanks to GUMP for the good catch .. :)
-Vincent
- Original Message -
From: Sam Ruby
I'd like to ask if anyone sees a problem for using AspectJ
(http://www.aspectj.org) with Cactus ? More specifically the license is MPL
(http://aspectj.org/servlets/AJSite?channel=downloadsubChannel=license). Is
that a problem ? I don't believe so, but just wanted to be sure.
If it works, I think
- Original Message -
From: Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:41 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] New Project Creation Guidelines
Sam,
I have integrated the changes that you suggested, please take a look.
for day D were
never found in file D-1.gz) ... until one month ago approx. I'm wondering
what changed and how it could have been ok prior to this ?
Thanks
-Vincent
- Original Message -
From: Brian Behlendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jon
01, 2001 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: Apache logs problem
Hello Vincent,
Assuming you are using webalizer, have you tried using the -f (fold sequence
errors) and the -p (preserve state) flags?
Regards, Ceki
At 11:39 29.09.2001 +0100, Vincent Massol wrote:
It seems there is a problem of dates
General Remark:
It seems the web logs have been moved recently from
/x2/logarchive/www/jakarta.apache.org/$YEAR/$MONTH to
/x2/logarchive/www/$YEAR/$MONTH. Also the day J.gz files now contains logs
for the J day and also some logs for the J+1 day ... which makes it harder
to get statistics for a
- Original Message -
From: Peter Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 11:25 AM
Subject: Re: Web logs statistics
On Thu, 27 Sep 2001 18:55, Vincent Massol wrote:
Statistics :
Is it possible to set up a statistics tool for all jakarta
Thanks to all who made this possible. The jakarta site has been updated to
reflect the change.
The new home for Cactus is http://jakarta.apache.org/cactus.
-Vincent
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
- Original Message -
From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 10:11 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Making Commons-Cactus a top level projet
All done... CVS moved (preserving history in jakarta-commons and renaming
Can someone add Cactus to the Apache Bug Database (as a top level project)
and remove its entry from Commons (as a sub component) ? Or tell me how to
do it ...
Thanks
-Vincent
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
- Original Message -
From: Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 4:43 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Making Commons-Cactus a top level projet
[snip]
We need:
- a new CVS. Is it possible to not to loose any history
I've had a look at http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html ...
Here are the strange things I found :
* Alexandria : no user list (Pier I thought you said ALL projects had both
lists ;-) )
* Avalon : no user list and a strange cvs list (I thought all CVS messages
went to the devlist ?)
*
-
From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 12:44 PM
Subject: Re: lists that don't require subscriber approval
Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had a look at http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html
- Original Message -
From: Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: lists that don't require subscriber approval
on 9/8/01 5:26 AM, Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok for doing the website
- Original Message -
From: Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: lists that don't require subscriber approval
on 9/8/01 5:26 AM, Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok for doing the website
.
Maybe now is the right time to vote for making Cactus a top level project ?
Are there conditions for that (like number of hits,downloads, community) ?
Who decides, PMC members ?
Thanks
-Vincent Massol
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
- Original Message -
From: Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 4:36 PM
Subject: Re: Proposed dirlayout document
Peter Donald wrote:
6) 2 options should be left to the project for the external jar needed
to
build/run the project. Until we
- Original Message -
From: Ceki Gülcü [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: Proposed dirlayout document
[znip]
I have asked this before but is there a need for an intermediary directory?
For example, to take an example I am familiar
et's wait for others to
comment on that.
p.s. Overall, I'm +0 after the above clarifications...
thanks,
-jon
Thanks
And sorry for my mistakes.
Vincent Massol
Creator and donator of J2EEUnit
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
subproject is to bepopulatedA release (0.9) of J2EEUnit is now
available from SourceForge http://j2eeunit.sourceforge.net/
under the GPL and also through theCommons-Sandbox CVS. Vincent Massol,
thedonor, certifies that he is the sole author and owner of the
sourcecode. If accepted, the latest ve
nd another name.
OK ... sigh If you have ideas, they are welcome ...
-- Ted Husted, Husted dot Com, Fairport NY USA.
-- Custom Software ~ Technical Services.
-- Tel 716 737-3463.
-- http://www.husted.com/about/struts/
Vinc
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Michael Reilly" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Vincent Massol" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 11:27 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] J2EEUnit donation to ASF
Vincent Massol writes:
- Original Message
- Original Message -
From: "John Summerfield" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 5:15 AM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] J2EEUnit donation to ASF
Thoughts and Comments:
It makes no sense to me to switch lists as it seems you've done. People
here
have
46 matches
Mail list logo
