On Sat, 25 May 2002 07:37, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On 5/24/02 5:28 PM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
If one quarter of the new commiters make 1/2 the contributions that
people
like Sam Ruby did - I'm quite happy.
As Mark Twain once said The rumors of
Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I said was but I believe that this group (as noted on the members
meeting this Tuesday) is giving away committer privileges a little bit too
easily... I don't think that sound like this is a resolution passed by
members or this is a guideline
That's what I did... I posted my -1 over there, detailed why, and I'm
waiting for someone to write me back something about it... So far, nothing
worth making me change my vote (meaning, nothing more than what was already
there).
So that means its vetoed...what's your beef?
No, my vote is
Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's what I did... I posted my -1 over there, detailed why, and I'm
waiting for someone to write me back something about it... So far, nothing
worth making me change my vote (meaning, nothing more than what was already
there).
So that means its
Just one question, have you ever voted -1 on a committer? (and not just to
you, but to every committer on this list).
I've abstained, informally (off-list, that is) from voting, once. The
guy in question had been active in a part of our project but I hadn't
been following on that at all, so I
Andy, not everyone grew up in Texas! :) I don't eat beef anymore (you know
mad-cow disease and smallpox in the UK)
Dern Europeans ain' speaking proper 'merican. Anyhow, just wait around
and you'll catch me speaking Spanish too.
I do not think the PMC should intervene just because
Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy, not everyone grew up in Texas! :) I don't eat beef anymore (you know
mad-cow disease and smallpox in the UK)
Dern Europeans ain' speaking proper 'merican. Anyhow, just wait around
and you'll catch me speaking Spanish too.
No estas problema,
On Fri, 24 May 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Right but it should be up to ya'll tomcatters to work out your standards
amonst yerselves. Thats my only issue.
Nope, because if I vote a committer in, I give him access to the Tomcat CVS
repo, but I also entitle him to vote for the friggin'
Costin Manolache wrote:
If one quarter of the new commiters make 1/2 the contributions that
people
like Sam Ruby did - I'm quite happy.
As Mark Twain once said The rumors of my demise have been greatly
exaggerated.
- Sam Ruby
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
On 5/24/02 5:28 PM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
If one quarter of the new commiters make 1/2 the contributions that
people
like Sam Ruby did - I'm quite happy.
As Mark Twain once said The rumors of my demise have been greatly
exaggerated.
But he only said
On Fri, 24 May 2002, Sam Ruby wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
If one quarter of the new commiters make 1/2 the contributions that
people
like Sam Ruby did - I'm quite happy.
As Mark Twain once said The rumors of my demise have been greatly
exaggerated.
Sorry for picking your name as
Costin Manolache wrote:
If one quarter of the new commiters make 1/2 the contributions that people
like Sam Ruby did - I'm quite happy.
As Mark Twain once said The rumors of my demise have been greatly
exaggerated.
Sorry for picking your name as an example tomcat commiter - you are
just
* Perhaps a more fruitful topic for us to explore is when to retire
committer status due to inactivity. Pier is one of the few to do this
explicitly. I have done it a bit more implicitly - including submitting
patches to projects that I am officially a committer to.
yes. I recommend
On Fri, 24 May 2002, Sam Ruby wrote:
You hadn't qualified your statement to Tomcat, and I was just teasing about
your use of past tense. ;-)
All those foreigners who can't learn the proper English grammar and
spelling :-)
* Deciding when to convert a developer into a commiter is a balance
BTW, one idea ( not mine ) would be to have a separate and private list
for each project with _only_ the comitters.
The proposals for new commiters should be done on that list, not on the
public list.
I don't know what Dan feels about this whole topic, but I wouldn't
take it very well.
At 18:31 24.05.2002 -0400, Sam Ruby wrote:
* Perhaps a more fruitful topic for us to explore is when to retire
committer status due to inactivity. Pier is one of the few to do this
explicitly. I have done it a bit more implicitly - including submitting
patches to projects that I am officially
Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Overall, my feelings on the subject are:
* Deciding when to convert a developer into a commiter is a balance that
each project/subproject will need to determine for itself.
My feeling as well... The subject of my discussion was to get somewhere
else, but
Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Perhaps a more fruitful topic for us to explore is when to retire
committer status due to inactivity. Pier is one of the few to do this
explicitly. I have done it a bit more implicitly - including submitting
patches to projects that I am
The site docs say it can happen after 6 months of inactivity. Though I
can't seem to find the location atm. My question is how does it happen?
john mcnally
On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 16:39, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Perhaps a more fruitful topic for
On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 17:06, John McNally wrote:
The site docs say it can happen after 6 months of inactivity. Though I
can't seem to find the location atm.
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/roles.html
My question is how does it happen?
john mcnally
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
In truthit doesn't.
On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 20:18, John McNally wrote:
On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 17:06, John McNally wrote:
The site docs say it can happen after 6 months of inactivity. Though I
can't seem to find the location atm.
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/roles.html
My
21 matches
Mail list logo
