RE: [Fwd: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project fulcrum-cache (in module jakarta-turbine-fulcrum) failed]
-Original Message- From: Thomas Vandahl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 1:27 PM To: Jakarta General List Subject: [Fwd: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project fulcrum-cache (in module jakarta-turbine-fulcrum) failed] Hi folks, we get those messages by gump that puzzle me. These are not uncommon dependencies I guess. I made sure that the two files exist on ibiblio. How do I know about which dependencies gump knows and which it doesn't know? Gump knows only about the dependencies that you tell it about (and, in particular, absolutely nothing about ibiblio ;-). You need to: $ svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/gump/metadata $ cd metadata/project $ vi jakarta-turbine-fulcrum.xml $ svn ci to tell Gump that you need these. Bye, Thomas. Original Message [...] The build cannot continue because of the following unsatisfied dependencies: commons-lang-2.1.jar jcs-20030822.182132.jar [...] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as the intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or distribute this message or any attachment. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and then delete all copies of this message and any attachments. In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive information, such as social security numbers, account numbers, personal identification numbers and passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Jakarta Apache Tomcat as a TLP ?
- Original Message - From: Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List general@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 2:45 PM Subject: Re: Jakarta Apache Tomcat as a TLP ? From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Well I'd like to know the pros and cons of Tomcat being TLP. As I said in tomcat-dev, it was proposed when ant became TLP and at this time the consensus was to stay under jakarta umbrella. What motivate the move to TLP now. Currently, Tomcat developers are having to take time away from their main task (coding) to answer management issues raised by Jakarta. This raises the question of whether Tomcat is big enough and mature enough to manage these issues itself, without the involvement of Jakarta. Great. Now this thread has moved from JBoss-bashing to dissing the entire Tomcat community. I'm looking forward to your involvement on tomcat-dev so that we can all know that Tomcat has the proper adult supervision. For example, in this case, if Tomcat were a TLP, it seems likely (based on emails to the thread from Tomcat committers) that this PR release would have been a non-issue. Stephen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as the intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or distribute this message or any attachment. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and then delete all copies of this message and any attachments. In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive information, such as social security numbers, account numbers, personal identification numbers and passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [draft] SD Magazine: request for change
- Original Message - From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2005 3:01 PM Subject: Re: [draft] SD Magazine: request for change Henri Yandell wrote: It may be that leading contributor is, while not an 'Apache Way' to discuss something, a completely true piece of investigative journalism. There are definitely parts of Commons where a little bit of investigation could point out that Yes, on DBUtils 1.0, David Graham was the lead developer (Sorry David :) ). That may be true, but certainly we do have the right and responsibility to ensure that our desires, as far as how we run and represent ourselves, is accurate as well. It has always been a major foundation of the ASF that projects are built and developed by communities, not individuals. Terms such as lead or main do cause harm to the community and have always been actively avoided. And, yet, all of the complaints about the article have been from people that aren't involved with Tomcat development ;-). -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ There 10 types of people: those who read binary and everyone else. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as the intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or distribute this message or any attachment. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and then delete all copies of this message and any attachments. In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive information, such as social security numbers, account numbers, personal identification numbers and passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Leading Contributor?
Please don't feed the Trolls. - Original Message - From: Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List general@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 7:53 AM Subject: Re: Leading Contributor? Tim, This is a *VERY* slippery slope. All of us are committers at Apache on a personal basis and our employment is no bearing on our committer status. Remember, they (or anyone for that matter) else can fork Tomcat (and call it by any name they want and do whatever they want) if they crave publicity. IF they want to do joint publicity, they can of course contact the prc and make as much press releases to their heart's content. This is not the right way to do it. -- dims On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 09:55:43 -0500, Tim O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Yep, I think the only major request we can have here is that it be called Apache Tomcat and not just Tomcat. The 'leading Tomcat contributor' is just plain wrong, someone has been listening to JBoss press releases. As far as I know, JBoss as a company is not a contributor to the ASF, it merely employs some people who happen to be. So we don't even have to focus on the 'leading' as an issue, JBoss fail the 'contributor' too. Henri, some of this is word mincing. The facts, as I see them, are that Jboss does employ individuals to work on Tomcat full-time. We shouldn't be discouraging this effort and, as long as we guarantee the product is called Apache Tomcat, what harm is derived from noting that JBoss does contribute to the development of Tomcat? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as the intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or distribute this message or any attachment. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and then delete all copies of this message and any attachments. In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive information, such as social security numbers, account numbers, personal identification numbers and passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws
=== [X] +1 - let's do it [ ] -1 - not good === This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as the intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or distribute this message or any attachment. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and then delete all copies of this message and any attachments. In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive information, such as social security numbers, account numbers, personal identification numbers and passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] HiveMind as a Jakarta sub-project
[X] +1 I support this proposal [ ] -1 I don't support this proposal [ ] 0 I abstain from voting for or against this proposal This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as the intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or distribute this message or any attachment. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and then delete all copies of this message and any attachments. In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive information, such as social security numbers, account numbers, personal identification numbers and passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Jakarta: Confederation or Single Project?
I'm sure that Craig or other will correct my mistakes (I haven't been here quite that long :). Jakarta started as Tomcat and friends after Sun donated Tomcat to the ASF (hence the name 'Jakarta' :). As the project grew (sign of success), Jakarta grew to include projects that don't necessarily rely on Tomcat (but could be used with), nor that Tomcat relies on. This has been the traditional server-side-java test. Now, Jakarta has been having projects that want to leave to ASF-TLP status (e.g. log4j, ant, maven, james). This is calling into question what the 'Jakarta' name stands for now. What this thread is about is trying to answer this question: what, if any, is the mission of 'Jakarta' going forward. - Original Message - From: Harish Krishnaswamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 9:11 PM Subject: Re: Jakarta: Confederation or Single Project? Could someone please explain the motivation behind the creation of Jakarta and how it got to where it is today? May be that would help answer some of the questions we have? -Harish - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as the intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or distribute this message or any attachment. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and then delete all copies of this message and any attachments. In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive information, such as social security numbers, account numbers, personal identification numbers and passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [POLL] Future Of Turbine-JCS
- Original Message - From: Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 7:35 PM Subject: Re: [POLL] Future Of Turbine-JCS On 11/30/03 6:57 PM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: What do the turbine people want? If we presume the existance of 'turbine people', then that would be a good indication that the right thing to do would be to leave JCS within turbine, and encourage turbine to be promoted to a top level project, taking JCS with it. If there are not Turbine people then Turbine should be archived and noted as deprecated. Please don't feed the trolls :-) -andy On Nov 30, 2003, at 6:08 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote: On 30 Nov 2003, at 20:41, robert burrell donkin wrote: sorry, missed one and probably [ ] leave JCS within turbine [ ] JCS to apache commons [ ] JCS to jakarta commons [ ] JCS to jakarta top level [ ] JCS to incubator [ ] something else (please specify)... ps before i get flamed (once again), i'd better add that i think that it'd be useful to try to get some consensus about where the right place for JCS is and that's why i started this thread. whatever action to be taken (if any) will have to be decided on the pmc list. - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Andrew C. Oliver http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI http://jakarta.apache.org/poi For Java and Excel, Got POI? The views expressed in this email are those of the author and are almost definitely not shared by the Apache Software Foundation, its board or its general membership. In fact they probably most definitively disagree with everything espoused in the above email. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as the intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or distribute this message or any attachment. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and then delete all copies of this message and any attachments. In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive information, such as social security numbers, account numbers, personal identification numbers and passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [NOTICE] to all jakarta committers
28 copies of spam and viruses: I knew there was a reason I didn't read my @apache.org email :). However, I've added a .forward file so I can read more spam! Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, robert burrell donkin wrote: will all jakarta committers please ensure that there apache.org email account is set up so that it forwards mail to an account that they read. Or, if not forwarded, please ensure that you read mail to your Apache account. For example, you can ssh to minotaur and read it using pine. -- Martin Cooper this is very easy to configure - just log on to cvs.apache.org using ssh and then edit the .forward file. (one way to do this is to use vi. type vi .forward type i then your normal email address next press ESC :x ENTER.) official mail from the ASF is directed to your apache.org email account. you need to be able to read it. - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Jakarta: too many similar projects?
- Original Message - From: Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 8:40 PM Subject: Re: Jakarta: too many similar projects? Yeah, on second thought, its a great idea to remove choice in a project and instead submit it to a JSR committee and hence Suns conrol, take a few folks and put them on NDA so that they can't talk about certain decisions which will affect the project. I'm not against all standards...just NDA-based vendor baby kissing. Please don't feed the Trolls. -Andy Craig R. McClanahan wrote: On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 22:09:14 -0500 From: Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Jakarta: too many similar projects? Thanks Pier. Thats a great perpective. Lets have some more. Anyone have a remarkably positive Gee the JCP listens to everyone and I can disclose everything to my fellow committers and its been great for our community? Andy seems to believe that *implementing* a specification (as opposed to creating one) is not a valid itch to be scratched if he doesn't like the mechanism by which the specification is created. It's perfectly reasonable for Andy to decide that for the projects he gets personally involved in, but it seems awfully arrogant to argue that no one at Apache should involve themselves in such an implementation project on that basis. As it turns out, there is substantial room for innovation and debate in the implementation of API specs like servlet and JSP (see the history of Tomcat development, and the recent innovation going on there for an example), just like there is lots of room to be creative in implementing something like HTTP, which has been done, and continues to be done, in a very large number of implementations in a very large number of languages -- despite the fact that the W3C standards process, like many others, includes periods of time when only the privileged few are allowed to be involved. -Andy Craig McClanahan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: re[2]: Differences between Structs and Turbine ???
- Original Message - From: Rich Persaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 8:26 PM Subject: re[2]: Differences between Structs and Turbine ??? New and improved pain may promise an average POI (Pain-on-Investment) that is 50% of the familiar pain, but will be assigned a risk profile with unknown maximum pain. Now we finally know what the POI developers were thinking. ;-) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PROPOSAL] Committer access and responsibilities...
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 9:17 PM Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Committer access and responsibilities... On Sun, 26 May 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: but all i can say from the history i know, that you are simply suffering some kind of father syndrome, like those fathers that, when his children Stop reading Freud :-) ! Before Nacho kicked in, I was going for Jungian myself. :) We need to add as commiters not only a lawyer, but also a shrink now. +1 for the shrink. That way I might be able to get through my inbox in finite time. ;-) Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Database Subproject Discussion : creation of DBCommons ?
- Original Message -
From: Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:02 PM
Subject: Re: Database Subproject Discussion : creation of DBCommons ?
On Thu, 02 May 2002, Geir Magnusson, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Costin suggested, and I supported, that a subproject of wider scope
be created to allow the collection of similar technologies into one
larger subcommunity.
First of all, I like the idea. But in general I think this should not
be something we (we as in general@jakarta) should decide but the
committers of the current (sub(sub))projects that would make up this
new subproject had to decide.
If the people working on Torque, commons-dbcp or the Avalon database
stuff (I'm sure I'm missing something) as well as the people of
Onjectbridge want to create this new subproject, I'll be all for it -
but it should be their decision IMHO.
+1
Unless Costin's proposal is to kick it up to the Apache PMC, then all the
Jakarta PMC has is a straight up/down vote. The scope of the project is up
to the committers on the project, not the PMC. If ${PMC-member} doesn't
like the direction, then they can work to get committer status and change
it. Jakarta isn't managed from the top-down.
If Costin's proposal is to kick it up to the Apache PMC, then that
automatically takes it outside of the scope of general@jakarta. So it is
still a straight up/down vote.
Just my $0.02.
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PMC Nomination - Costin Manolache
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 10:36 PM Subject: Re: PMC Nomination - Costin Manolache After some thinking, I'm going to accept the nomination, even if I don't quite believe jakarta needs 'management', 'committee' or any other function besides 'jakarta commiter'. If not for other reasons, for this alone, Costin has my (now ruled useless) +1. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
