Henri Yandell wrote:
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Costin Manolache wrote:
Or even better - since jakarta has a single PMC, it could also have a single
list of committers ( most of them in the single PMC ).
Each PMC member can vote about any jakarta issue - including releases of
each sub-project, etc. If
Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
Hi, Phil and all.
Did you make it? If you failed, I think i can
apply the patch for it (I am *not* subscribing to
infrastructure@, now).
I did make the patch and posted it in an email to infrastructure@ on
11/23. It has not been applied.
I am attaching the patch to
Robert Leland wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
It seems odd to me that code changes effectively require consensus,
but a release would not. What am I missing here?
All code in CVS is already there on consensus.
As are the bugs ;-)
Seriously, this seems like sort of a grey
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Not really (my POV)
As people we naturally think in terms of the hierarchy
ASF to Jakarta to MySubProject.
But the middle layer is artificial. It could just as well be XML or DB or
WebApps or Java or C or 'Projects starting with S' or 'Projects where Joe
Bloggs works'.
Ted Husted wrote:
(Again, sorry about the quoting.)
o·ver·sight
1. An unintentional omission or mistake.
2. Watchful care or management; supervision
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=oversight
The board expects PMCs to exercise (2) so as to avoid (1). :)
For a PMC this boils down
Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
I am with Erik on no JARs in CVS. Unless it is a legal issue, I would
certainly like to distribute all JARs with the distribution. It saves a
lot of hassle and keeps uncessary traffic out of the user-list.
At the expense of lots of wasted bandwidth and disk space. I
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
All Jakarta Community Members :
Howard M. Lewis Ship, on behalf of the committers of the HiveMind
project in the Jakarta Commons sandbox, has proposed HiveMind as a
Jakarta sub-project. The proposal was sent to this list, a copy of
which can be found here :
+1
Phil
Suggested new bylaws are at:
http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html
The aim is to identify the current reality, rather than plan out a new
set
of bylaws. I believe I've responded to the past week of comments,
sometimes by dropping things from the text as they require
Ant cannot find the junit jar that it needs, despite the fact that it is
grabbing it as a dependency :-(
Look in $ANT_HOME/lib and make sure that both junit.jar and optional.jar
are there, since that is where ant will look for them. You can copy the
downloaded junit jar from target/lib if you
I am +1 for this move and the plan.
One thing that folks should be warned of, however, is that changing the
directory structure will break site builds that depend on paths like
../jakarta-site2/xdocs/stylesheets, so these will have to changed when
these projects nove. I don't know how many
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Martin Cooper wrote:
I think, if we had a standard template for download pages, each
subproject could have its own download page, something like we have
for Struts:
http://struts.apache.org/download.cgi
Agreed, much nicer than the closer.cgi. I'd prefer
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Phil Steitz wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Martin Cooper wrote:
I think, if we had a standard template for download pages, each
subproject could have its own download page, something like we have
for Struts:
http://struts.apache.org
Hate to push us around in a circle, but what exactly was so bad about Related?
Phil
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 1/12/2005 1:59 PM
To: Jakarta General List
Cc:
Subject: Re: [site] Label
Thank you, Hen!
Henri Yandell wrote:
I'd like to go ahead and move to my suggested new download pages:
http://jakarta.apache.org/~bayard/jakarta/site/downloads/downloads.html
[X] +1
[ ] -1
or alternatively:
[ ] +1, but fix this first: [ ]
Currently the filenames match the names on the
Henri Yandell wrote:
snip/
You've pointed out that JBoss are the contributor in your commits,
rather than yourself as an individual. I assume other JBoss employees
are in the same situation. How does that change the email? Do I need
to drop the paragraph about JBoss not being a contributor
I
Robert Voelkerding wrote:
Please direct me to an explanation of how to use MDE and/or PGP keys to verify
downloads.
Thank you.
Robert,
The basic instructions are, e.g., here:
http://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi#verify
Make sure to download the KEYS file from the main apache distribution
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
there have been a number of long running threads in the commons
discussing the possibility of commons components for use in web
applications. the consensus emerged that it would be best if a new
subproject with a structure similar to the
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
In reading through this all, I have a concern that it will be difficult
for any outside code to come in. Indeed it has proven difficult for
many people I have spoken to to get code into any Commons project
(although I myself had some things accepted, so clearly it is
,
that could conflict with that idea. I'm not sure.
Frank
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
snip
Don't know what kind of goo 12 would result in or who would use such
a thing ;-)
this has proved impractical in the jakarta commons. i
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
9 or somewhere else should speak to J2EE or other external config
requirments, which should be fine, even encouraged in some cases
is 9 needed? are any configuration guidelines
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
There doesn't seem to be a thread for this
The current suggestions are:
Commons Web
Jakarta Web Parts for Java (JWP4J)
Web App Commons
Web App Components
Web App Modules
Web Bricks
Web Commons
Web Components
Web Libs
Web Parts
Web Tools
Weblets
Of
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 6/23/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
snip
Interpreted literally, 17 goes against standard practice in jakarta (or
apache, to my knowledge, other than in the incubator). I would
recommend
+1 to drop this
Phil
robert burrell donkin wrote:
8. Packages are encouraged to either use JavaBeans as core objects, a
JavaBean-style API, or to provide an optional JavaBean wrapper.
doesn't seem very relevant. i think that it'd be simpler just to drop
it.
here's my +1
- robert
robert burrell donkin wrote:
snip/
Agreed. After a little more discussion, we should rewrite this.
+1
anyone feel like jumping volunteering to come up with a draft?
Working on this now...
Phil
-
To unsubscribe,
Here is a stab at replacement text for 15, 17 and 18.
15-1 Any member of the community may propose a new package. To be
accepted, a package proposal must receive majority approval of the
subproject committers and at least one committer must volunteer to serve
as an initial package team member.
robert burrell donkin wrote:
there doesn't see any enthusiasm for those new ideas and no objections
to phil's draft. i think we should go ahead and make the changes
suggested by phil.
I went ahead and updated, making some small changes to (hopefully)
address the points above. I marked the
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
P.S.-What list do I subscribe to in order to receive the jakarta site
svn commit messages?
site-cvs@jakarta.apache.org
Phil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Brett Porter wrote:
On 8/10/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Promoting Commons Sandbox to SLP as 'Jakarta Sandbox'.
+ All Jakarta committers given access, central management of the sandbox
+ concepts as opposed to individual SLP sandboxes (Taglibs, Commons,
+ Turbine probably has
Henri Yandell wrote:
Prototype of what I want to do javadoc-wise for Jakarta :)
http://dist.osjava.org/releases/multidoc-jnr/
(click on something as long as it's not Payload 0.3 or 0.4; seems my
distributions are lacking javadoc there).
Any opinions?
I like the idea of doing this and
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Hi,
I toyed with similar ideas for a long time (I even had once an intern
whip something up), however, there are a number of drawbacks:
- different versions. The osjava variant tries to get this right by
allowing the
Sorry, should be
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/apidocs/maven.xml
-Phil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Jakarta Commons Math team is pleased to announce the release of
Commons Math 1.1.
Commons Math is a library of lightweight, self-contained mathematics and
statistics components. For more information, see the Commons Math web site:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/math/.
The new release
Yes, and (thanks to Rahul), Step 12 of the commons release instructions
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases/release.html
has been updated to reflect the change.
One more note that I am about to add is that the Ant build now used to
gen the Jakarta site requires JDK 1.5, so make sure that
Henri Yandell wrote:
An FYI. Please kick me if I'm going too far with these ideas; I get the
feeling I have a general +0, but hard to tell sometimes.
See interspersed. I am not quite to the + point yet, but probably
either just missing some concepts / principles or interested in
Henri Yandell wrote:
snip/
It would be great if we could get a consensus on what an umbrella
is and
An umbrella is a joining of disjoint communities under a common TLP.
A non-umbrella is one in which the whole project is a part of the
same community.
Nice definition. Thanks.
snip/
Henri Yandell wrote:
As a second email in the Notice of intent series; here's what I think
being a Jakarta component will be like in the future.
* Jakarta is a collection of components. Hopefully all sitting at the
same level. ie) a big bag of things.
How are you defining component?
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Roland Weber wrote:
Hello,
other 1-word suggestions would be great.
since they're language components, you can call them Syllables :-)
I understand the desire for 'fancy' names, but it misses the point
unfortunately. This is merely a grouping a several *Jakarta*
Thomas Dudziak wrote:
On 3/7/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas Dudziak wrote:
Could you elaborate a bit on what the physical / visual-to-users
differences to the current commons, well, Jakarta sub-project will be
? Will this be a new Jakarta sub-project (and the
Martin Cooper wrote:
snip/
I think this whole thing is putting the cart before the horse. You're in the
process of destroying Commons, not just dismantling it, and for no good
reason that I can see. The people involved with Digester should be the ones
to initiate a discussion about whether or
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 6/6/06, Felipe Leme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
So, answering your question, yes, the project is supposed to support
libraries from another languages. In fact, the existence of such
libraries is an argument for the TLP creation; besides the existing
Cactus and
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 6/16/06, Felipe Leme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
I think these statements are a good start for the next meeting's
proposal - could someone write an wiki entry for it (or even update
the current resolution)? I'm traveling until Sunday and my internet
connection is
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 6/20/06, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 6/16/06, Felipe Leme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
I think these statements are a good start for the next meeting's
proposal - could someone write an wiki entry for it (or even update
discussed and agreed
and I just missed it.
Phil
From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 8/11/2006 9:36 AM
To: Jakarta General List
Subject: Re: svn commit: r430653 - /jakarta/jakarta-build/trunk/pom.xml
Phil Steitz wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
Thanks, Dennis. That helps and I agree with your arguments for
inheritence in genera;.
But why a Jakarta parent?
I'll leave that one for Henri to answer.
Do I
Henri Yandell wrote:
On 1/16/07, Ortwin Glück [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone (Henry?) know what happened to
http://www.apache.org/dev/nightly-builds.html ?
It's referenced from
http://www.apache.org/dev/
at the very bottom of the page. I'm looking for information how to get
+1
Phil
Felipe Leme wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote to have Petar Tahchiev as a Jakarta Committer.
Petar currently works as software engineer in Bulgaria, but was a MSc
student last year, when we proposed porting the Cactus build to Maven
2 as a GSOC (Google Summer of Code) project.
+1
Phil
Sadly a bit too late to make the next board meeting I suspect.
However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that it move to TLP.
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution
Please add your name if you're a Commons developer and haven't added
your name yet.
[
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
This seems a little overplanned in my mind ;) Allow a little more evolution.
- Commons goes TLP.
- Rules for Commons TLP become clear (one mailing list, one PMC, anyone
commits in any component, anyone votes/reviews any release, comfortable
social group)
- Then
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 5:56 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/05/2008, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 28/05/2008, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MD5, PGP good.
It's a bit odd that the binary version comes chock full of jars and
the source version doesn't.
sebb wrote:
Trying again ...
The licence issues reported by Henri have (I trust) been fixed.
To rebuild or test JMeter, you need to unpack both the binary and
source archives in the same directory structure. This is because the
library files are not duplicated in the source archive.
I
sebb wrote:
[Third time lucky?]
Please review and vote on the BSF 3.1 release.
The artifacts are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~sebb/bsf-3.1-RC3/
The Maven artifacts are at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebsf-004/
The SVN tag is at:
sebb wrote:
On 19/06/2010, Phil Steitz p...@steitz.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
[Third time lucky?]
Please review and vote on the BSF 3.1 release.
The artifacts are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~sebb/bsf-3.1-RC3/
The Maven artifacts are at:
https
Is there anything left actually to put in the attic? Maybe just disband the
PMC?
Phil
On Nov 10, 2011, at 10:01 AM, Henri Yandell bay...@apache.org wrote:
A joint vote to retire Jakarta into the Attic and to ask the board to
close down the PMC.
[ ] +1
[ ] -1, because
Hen
53 matches
Mail list logo
