On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 09:49 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> what do people want to have in place before we move gcc-5.2 into ~arch ?
For one thing, the fix for runtime failure in 64-bit wine:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66838
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision=225935
On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 10:24 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 01 Oct 2015 10:11, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 09:49 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > what do people want to have in place before we move gcc-5.2 into
> > > ~arch ?
> >
>
On Sun, 2015-09-20 at 22:32 +0200, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the first question is addressed both to llvm-dev and gentoo-dev. The
> second one is Gentoo specific.
>
> Is there any possibility to build LLVM both as static and shared libraries?
>
> What I see currently is that our ebuild
On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 07:20 -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 9/17/15 7:05 AM, James Le Cuirot wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 06:57:08 -0400
> > "Anthony G. Basile" wrote:
> >
> > > Totally rethink the idea of emails aliases as something that is
> > > created on the fly.
On Wed, 2015-09-09 at 09:20 +0200, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
In chromium's case (a new gtk3-based ui that needs wider testing), a
local gtk3 USE flag does make sense.
But in general, the gnome team recommends avoiding the gtk3 flag
whenever possible. We definitely don't want it to become a global
On Wed, 2015-09-09 at 11:00 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> I would really like a way to toggle gtk3 for testing. If you don't
> want to expose it as a 'supported' option for users, then masking it
> sounds fine to me.
Then add the flag, document it in metadata.xml.
But in general, try to avoid
On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 16:00 +0200, George Shapovalov wrote:
> 2. Is there some standard naming scheme? Should the new eclass be called,
> say,
> gnatbuild2.eclass or gnatbuild-ng.eclass? Of course this only matters if old
> eclass is there to stay. If not I'll just call the transitory eclass
>
On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 19:42 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
Hi,
Right now, a number of game packages are using USE=dedicated to control
'installing a dedicated game server only'. Aside to that, some game
packages also have USE=server that controls building the server itself.
Non-game package use
On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 16:04 +0300, Sergey Popov wrote:
You want to migrate to such decision? Like:
qt? (
qt5? ( dev-lang/qtcore:5 )
!qt5? ( dev-lang/qtcore:4 )
)
Fine by me, if you would ask.
That flag should be called gui. Not qt.
This would be the real solution to gnome
On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 00:02 +1000, Michael Palimaka wrote:
3. Create a whole new solution like USE=gui (what happens if I have
multiple gui implementation USE flags set?)
This is what I would suggest. It would remove 90% of the problem since
most applications use only one gui toolkit.
If no
On Sun, 2015-08-09 at 22:38 +0300, Sergey Popov wrote:
qa team lead hat
In short - apropriate REQUIRED_USE with setting recommended
USE-flag(e.g. USE=+qt4 qt5 or USE=qt4 +qt5)
/qa team lead hat
If a package has optional guis, why should users of the default profile get any
gui enabled by
On Sun, 2015-08-09 at 17:30 +0200, hasufell wrote:
On 08/09/2015 05:19 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
I'd just go with Gentoo-Bug. The X- is pointless since it was
for eXtending Email-Headers. And what we do is only linked in
style.
I'd be
On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 11:59 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 4 August 2015 at 04:20, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
[...]
Gentoo should be the best of both worlds. We should give users the
power to tweak things, but we shouldn't force them to play with config
files all day long just
On Sun, 2015-07-05 at 20:25 +0200, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Hi there!
I'm having trouble updating Qt:4 (dev-qt/qt*-4.8*:4) from 4.8.6 to 4.8.7.
Looking at the ebuilds, they require some 4.8.7 versions to be installed
already that in turn cannot be installed because other ebuilds require
On Sun, 2015-07-05 at 21:25 +0200, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 05.07.2015 20:44, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
What I usually end up doing is listing my installed dev-qt/qt* ebuilds, and
updating all of them together explicitly:
emerge -1 qtcore:4 qtgui:4 qtsql:4 etc.
That's what I
On Sun, 2015-07-05 at 02:16 +0700, C Bergström wrote:
2) I don't understand your comment about signatures.
Gpg commit signatures [1] which are a requirement for any gentoo git
workflow. Rebasing breaks the author's signature afaict, so the user
who is doing rebasing needs to re-sign the commit
their unversioned 'valac' binary
27 Jun 2015; Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org
deja-dup-32.0-r1.ebuild, deja-dup-34.0.ebuild:
Pacho, something went wrong with your gpg - Manifest has no signature
after your commit.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
This was supposed to be an email only to Pacho, unfortunately I didn't
check the to line and sent it to the list.
But since it has gone to the list - it would be useful to have an
automatic tool scanning for unsigned or incorrectly signed Manifests
and maybe listing them in
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 07:06 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-06-23, o godz. 01:23:13
Jason Zaman ja...@perfinion.com napisał(a):
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:55:45PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-06-22, o godz. 16:38:30
Jason Zaman perfin...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
Hi
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:54 -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
Hi All,
Sorry for the trouble. My cvs history foo is a little weak but it appears
that someone went out and did some deleting in profiles/arch/arm64 of some
WIP things without bothering to email, irc or otherwise communicate.
A) Could
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 10:37 -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
On Mar 30, 2015, at 10:18 AM, Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:54 -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
Hi All,
Sorry for the trouble. My cvs history foo is a little weak but it appears
that someone
On Sun, 2015-03-08 at 21:31 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Some ebuilds in portage for Qt-based software support both Qt4 as well
as Qt5. Some have +qt4 qt5 in IUSE, others have qt4 qt5.
Is there a guideline for this somewhere? If a package needs Qt and thus
lists:
REQUIRED_USE=^^ (
On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 01:13 +0200, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 21:34:10 -0400
Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org wrote:
Why not adapt the updates mechanism for modifying rdepends? Perhaps
something like
rdepends-add foo-bar/blah-3.14 wombat? ( =dev-libs/wombat-1.0
On Mon, 2014-07-21 at 22:56 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
Yes, it does. I'm not sure if it leads anywhere, though. Dynamic deps
are a pipe dream. You can't implement them properly, so we're using
half-working implementation as an excuse to be lazy.
Why not adapt the updates mechanism for
On Sun, 2014-06-29 at 23:01 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
I am starting a new thread so we don't refer to a specific package, but I
am quoting Rich and hasufell from the previous masking thread.
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:04:54AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 8:36
On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 11:29 +, hasufell wrote:
I agree that masking for testing is like having a 3rd branch, but I'm
not convinced that this is a bad thing.
I have to reiterate:
* increases the workload, because we are effectively running 3 branches
* decreases the amount of testing
On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 22:15 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
So, why the heck, was the dependency to dev-libs/glib changed for an
existing ebuild without increasing its version (e.g. dbus-glib-0.100.2-r2)?
Please see http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/91615
I have to use an older
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 10:17 -0400, Joshua Kinard wrote:
What I'd like to see is a list of all affected packages so we all can get a
sense of just how big the actual problem really is. All I am hearing so far
are unsubstantiated claims of tree-wide breakage. Knowing which packages
are broken
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 11:20 -0400, Joshua Kinard wrote:
On 06/17/2014 10:56, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 10:17 -0400, Joshua Kinard wrote:
What I'd like to see is a list of all affected packages so we all can get a
sense of just how big the actual problem really
On Sat, 2014-06-14 at 16:13 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:41:51 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
However, this means that we force much more rebuilds than necessary.
This shouldn't be considered to be a problem.
This would be suicide for Gentoo as a
On Sat, 2014-06-14 at 16:56 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 11:50:29 -0400
Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 2014-06-14 at 16:13 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:41:51 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
However
On Sat, 2014-06-14 at 17:31 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 12:17:52 -0400
Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 2014-06-14 at 16:56 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 11:50:29 -0400
Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org wrote
On Sat, 2014-06-14 at 16:41 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
Considering the libtool versioning, there are two kinds of library
bumps relevant to us:
1) when ABI is altered in backwards-compatible way (so old stuff is not
touched),
2) when ABI is altered in backwards-incompatible way.
The
On Sat, 2014-06-14 at 12:50 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
Example: glib and gobject-introspection.
s/gobject-introspection/dbus-glib/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sat, 2014-05-10 at 13:50 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 10 May 2014 04:34, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 05/09/2014 09:32 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Fri, 9 May 2014 16:15:58 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
I think fixing upstream is a no-brainer.
It
On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 17:09 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
x11-libs/cairo
I will take this.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 17:25 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
I'm strongly considering reverting these changes in the packages I
maintain. I'm tired of having to deal time and again with multilib
breakage.
Either that, or someone else can take over primary maintainership.
Ben, if you are
On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 13:13 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 1 April 2014 06:16, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello, all.
The late multilib ppc issues made me re-check our stable masks on
abi_x86_* flags and, honestly, I'm not sure if we're doing things
the right way.
That
The best solution is to figure out why the directory is being created there and
whether it is customizable. Maybe the code actually is creating
$HOME/InstallShield? Then export HOME=${T} in your ebuild.
On March 31, 2014 2:24:24 PM EDT, Kfir Lavi lavi.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014
On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 02:07 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
An amd64 multilib system *is* expected to build x86
binaries that would be hosted on itself. So i686-pc-linux-gnu-ar is
expected to be not a part of any cross-compile toolchain, but a part of
the native toolchain for the machine's
On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 22:41 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wed 26 Mar 2014 12:23:53 Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 26/03/14 12:12 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
that's bs. people install crossdev to get a cross-compile
environment, not to get something that only works through `emerge`.
On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 09:55 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-03-12, o godz. 15:46:01
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
We have a problem where the crossdev pkg-config wrapper scripts
interfere with multilib.
crossdev
On Wed, 2014-03-12 at 14:24 +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
Making udev dependency always on is a deliberate choice here
I thought Gentoo was about users having choice? Sad face.
Gentoo is usually about the maintainer's choice ;)
So in the end it's up to Pacho:
On Wed, 2014-03-12 at 15:46 +, hasufell wrote:
We have a problem where the crossdev pkg-config wrapper scripts
interfere with multilib.
crossdev for example sets in their pkg-config wrappers:
PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR=${SYSROOT}/usr/lib/pkgconfig:${SYSROOT}/usr/share/pkgconfig
Now, SYSROOT
On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 01:45 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Sun, 2014-03-09 at 23:22 -0400, Joshua Kinard wrote:
On 03/08/2014 9:55 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Sat, 2014-03-08 at 21:23 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote:
So I want to try and play around with a particular network
On Sun, 2014-03-09 at 23:22 -0400, Joshua Kinard wrote:
On 03/08/2014 9:55 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Sat, 2014-03-08 at 21:23 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote:
So I want to try and play around with a particular network domination tool
on my home network, Omphalos. However, its current
On Sat, 2014-03-08 at 21:23 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote:
So I want to try and play around with a particular network domination tool
on my home network, Omphalos. However, its current configure script has a
hard dependency on bluetooth.h, part of the net-wireless/bluez package.
Currently,
On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 15:54 +0400, Sergey Popov wrote:
02.03.2014 19:52, Michał Górny пишет:
Dnia 2014-03-02, o godz. 16:45:03
Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 09:37:22 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Few months ago I have written a small
On Sat, 2014-02-22 at 14:57 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
wxGTK not only splits up libraries by version and toolkit, but also by charset
and debug/release. If we had to use different SLOTs rather than USE flags we
would need eight of them for 2.8 alone. And I don't know how we would name
the
On Sat, 2014-02-22 at 15:59 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 15:50:17 -0600
Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 16:09:53 -0500
Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 2014-02-22 at 14:57 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
wxGTK not only
On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 02:47 -0600, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
OR, since I'm the maintainer, I decide that I'm willing to deal with
both, instead of you telling me that I need to pick one or the other.
Upstream says both are supported and viable, and I'm willing to deal
with the headaches. Just
On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 03:23 -0600, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
The KDE team seems to be able to deal with it just fine, but somehow
it's impossible and hard for the GNOME team. Why is that? What does
KDE do differently that makes it feasible?
The KDE ecosystem moved from qt3 to qt4 around
On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 10:26 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
Unfortunately, at the same time, lots of other developers are going
to start adding support for building against gtk2 XOR gtk3. Because
of course Gentoo is about choice, and the more
On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 09:58 +0100, Jan Matejka wrote:
What's the point of having nonempty XDG_ variables in ebuilds?
One big reason is FEATURES=test. Test suites for freedesktop-compliant
programs that actually run the program are likely to fail if XDG_*
directories are resolved as something
On January 28, 2014 12:03:04 PM EST, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
Option 3: Unset the variables
This should cause applications to default to locations under ${HOME}.
Only those applications that properly comply with standards :)
For instance, glib did not start respecting ${HOME}
[Replying again since my mailer messed up my original message.]
On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 12:03 -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
Option 3: Unset the variables
This should cause applications to default to locations under ${HOME}.
This could be done in global scope (unless I am overlooking something
in
On Sat, 2013-11-02 at 20:12 +0100, yac wrote:
c6 indicates xarchiver will break on unrar-5 when it will go stable but
it still is not stable, is it? Given the way this issue is
communicated, I have to ask - Is it even true? The rar major version
seems to be related to rar format version rather
On Fri, 2013-09-13 at 19:16 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
OpenRC currently has a public api, consisting of librc and libeinfo
(rc.h and einfo.h are the headers); however, I do not know of any
released software that uses these, so, if there is nothing, I am
considering making this code
On Fri, 2013-09-13 at 22:48 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 09:04:06PM -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
app-admin/openrc-settingsd uses various functions (rc_sys(),
rc_runlevel_get(), rc_service_exists(), rc_service_in_runlevel(),
rc_service_resolve(), rc_service_mark
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 10:10 +0200, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
As per my comment in bugzilla [1] I said that the patch should be
submitted upstream prior having it in cvs.
Yet you decided to completely ignore my statement and just smash in
the patch anyway [2].
Please don't do this ever
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 14:45 +0200, Michael Weber wrote:
Greetings,
Gnome Herd decided to target stablilization of 3.8 [1] which requires
systemd.
What are the reasons to stable 3.8 and not 3.6, a version w/o this
restriction, enabling all non systemd users to profit from this
eye-candy
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 09:35 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 11:04:28 +0200
Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
That's fine, bug wranglers are doing a great job there.
However, I'm also
On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 22:12 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
Honestly, I don't think maintainers should be asked to justify
features unless they're actually causing some kind of conflict.
If Robin wants to support USE=static for lvm2, he can do so. If it
somehow caused problems with other
On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 16:17 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jul 2013, Michał Górny wrote:
Pacho requested that to be able to warn users in GNOME packages that
do not work anymore without systemd.
Why is the host where the package is built required to run systemd?
Wouldn't a
Gentoo developers have been resigning from the project because they got burned
out by dealing with ad-hominems, insults, and flames. I do not see CoC
enforcement as some sort of plot to enforce groupthink or silence debate, but
as an attempt to fix the real problem of burnout and talent drain.
On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 04:19 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
I think I just realized what this means. I run ICEWM, not GNOME.
GNUMERIC and ABIWORWD and GIMP are the 3 GNOME apps that I use a lot.
Do I have to emerge GNOME-BASE in it's entirety just to get GSettings
working?
Then I misunderstood.
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 23:26 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:17:35PM -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote
It impacts users who use stable keywords and are therefore stuck with
GNOME-2.32. The workaround is for affected users to switch to ~arch
keywords (note that GNOME-3
On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 20:08 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
2. Patches have to apply to the top directory of the source tree with
'patch -p1'. If patches are applied to sub-directories, necessary '-p'
argument shall be passed to 'epatch' explicitly. Developers are
encouraged to create patches which
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 23:44 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
libpng 1.6 is in portage, but temporarily without KEYWORDS, pending on
testign and this conversion, help would be much appericiated with
converting the tree to use automatic rebuilds for the upgrade
Because there is binary-only
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 11:28 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 10:48:07PM -0500, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote
I am sorry that this package has been such a headache for you,
unfortunately binary drivers (especially) are often like that. Thanks
for all your hard work keeping
On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 06:07 +0100, Vaeth wrote:
So this 30 day delay will enable these people to get involved,
especially for all the packages which were removed in the last years?
Now it is apparent that an archive for dropped packages (in the
form of keeping masked packages or some other
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 00:25 -0500, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
On 01/03/2013 12:06 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:49:02 -0800
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
It came up again with https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449918,
and I think it's worth to
On Sun, 2012-12-23 at 12:20 +, Markos Chandras wrote:
But like I said, elog messages are already saved in
/var/log/portage/elog/$cat/$pf so people can
read these. Isn't this the same with what you suggest?
Is that by default? And when was that default added?
I certainly do not have
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 18:27 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
The FHS says:
/var/cache is intended for cached data from applications. Such data
is locally generated as a result of time-consuming I/O or
calculation. The application must be able to regenerate or restore
the data.
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 11:11 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
Hi lads,
lately I am having bit of problems from getting relevant debug info from
users.
Since we already have splitdebug for quite time (and I suppose quite
few of us are using it) how about making it to default profiles
default
Currently, the orc local USE flag is used by 11 packages, 9 of them
with identical descriptions. I think it's time to make it a global flag.
I would suggest the following description:
Use dev-lang/orc for just-in-time optimization of array operations
Current flag users:
Suppose I am upgrading an existing ebuild for dev-libs/libfoo-2.5 to
EAPI5 and adding a subslot, e.g. SLOT=2/5. Should I then add
slotmove =dev-libs/libfoo-2.5 2 2/5 in profiles/updates? Or should it
be slotmove =dev-libs/libfoo-2.5 2/2 2/5 (since the PMS states that
When the sub-slot part is
# Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org (05 Dec 2012)
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
# Incompatible with recent cogl and clutter versions (bug #435164)
mail-client/claws-mail-geolocation
media-libs/libchamplain-0.9
media-libs/clutter-gtk-1.0
On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 19:18 +0100, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
For a while I've been thinking that it would be sweet to feed all
variants (enabled/disabled) of several USE flags to a script to automate
testing with different USE flag combinations.
USE= x y
USE=-x y
USE= x -y
USE=-x -y
This
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 11:35 -0700, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
The problem with ICU is worse than you expect. For once, with version
50, it changes ABI (but not soname as far as I can tell) depending on
which compiler you build it with. Yes, this is pretty much fucked up.
It's even worse than
The recently added gnome2_disable_deprecation_warning() unfortunately
triggered maintainer mode and undesirable autoreconf for some packages
like file-roller, leading to build failure (see bug #439602); the
problem had been caused by configure.ac having a higher mtime than
aclocal.m4 and
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 21:01 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Hello
At least in spanish, it's mandatory to end phrases with a dot ., would
you agree with trying to enforce this trivial change with a repoman
warning?
Thanks for your opinions
In English, it is also mandatory to end sentences in .
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 16:38 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
It's my understanding that higher EAPI levels include more features.
How backwards compatable are the EAPI levels? I.e. assume that we take
an ebuild with EAPI 0, and slap in EAPI=1 (or 2 or 3, etc) at the top,
without any other changes.
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 13:04 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
I'll also remove as-is from @GPL-COMPATIBLE and @OSI-APPROVED again,
as soon as all packages in the system set have been fixed (only
net-misc/openssh and sys-apps/man-pages). It shouldn't have been added
to these groups, in the first
On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 23:37 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
- net-wireless/zd1201-firmware: No license in tarball or on homepage.
Ubuntu distributes it in their linux-firmware package with the following
LICENCE.zd1201 file:
The firmware was originally distributed by Zydas in their original
Revised to use a separate variable for the name of the flag instead of
reading IUSE, as suggested by Ciaran McCreesh. As a result of this
change, vala.eclass now defaults to assuming that vala support is
optional (which is the case in an overwhelming majority of ebuilds that
would want to use this
Pacho Ramos has suggested making vala_src_prepare() into a no-op in the
common situation where vala is in IUSE and USE=-vala.
--- a/vala.eclass
+++ b/vala.eclass
@@ -77,20 +77,36 @@
}
# @FUNCTION: vala_src_prepare
-# @USAGE: [--vala-api-version api_version]
+# @USAGE: [--ignore-use]
On Sun, 2012-09-09 at 22:09 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
Revised proposal with suggestions from Nirbheek. VALA_API_VERSION has
been split into max and min to make it easier for packages to depend on
a range of vala slots.
# Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under
: vala.eclass
# @MAINTAINER:
# gn...@gentoo.org
# @AUTHOR:
# Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org
# @BLURB: Sets up the environment for using a specific version of vala.
# @DESCRIPTION:
# This eclass sets up commonly used environment variables for using a specific
# version of dev-lang/vala
On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 15:45 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:21:15 +0200
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
Coming back to this old topic [1]. Is there still consensus that we
should have such an EJOBS variable? (It shouldn't be called JOBS
because this name is too
On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 00:02 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:50:16 -0400
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
In other words, pkg-config is only used when no other criteria
allows it to classify the particular .la
:
# Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org
# @BLURB: Sets up the environment for using a specific version of vala.
# @DESCRIPTION:
# This eclass sets up commonly used environment variables for using a specific
# version of dev-lang/vala to configure and build a package. It is needed for
# packages
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 02:15 +0200, hasufell wrote:
Is there a reason not to support static-libs in an ebuild if the package
supports it?
It seems some developers don't care about this option. What's the gentoo
policy on this? Isn't this actually a bug?
For example, static linking is
On Sat, 2012-08-25 at 23:45 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
export VALAC=$(type -P valac-${VALA_API_VERSION})
export VALA=$(type -P vala-${VALA_API_VERSION})
export VALA_GEN_INTROSPECT=$(type -P
vala-gen-introspect
On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 02:59 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
path=$(type -P valac-${VALA_API_VERSION})
[[ -n ${path} ]] VALAC=${path}
path=$(type -P vala-${VALA_API_VERSION})
[[ -n ${path} ]] VALA=${path}
path=$(type -P vala-gen-introspect
On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 02:59 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
In which case, the vala commands that are pulled in via DEPEND will be
(unless I am completely wrong about how pkg_config works) available
during pkg_config.
Commands that are not pulled in via DEPEND of course might
On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 15:45 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
Note that pkg_setup is called for binary packages too, which means that
DEPEND may not necessarily be installed. In EAPI 4 you can check the
MERGE_TYPE variable which can have a value of binary, source, orbuildonly.
The variables that
Second update, incorporating suggestions by Ulrich and Duncan.
# Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header: $
# @ECLASS: vala.eclass
# @MAINTAINER:
# gn...@gentoo.org
# @AUTHOR:
# Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org
On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 22:45 -0400, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:43:32 -0400
Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org wrote:
The variables that vala_pkg_setup sets are needed only at build time.
so it should be vala_src_prepare / unpack instead ?
definitely not anything
:
# Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org
# @BLURB: Sets up the environment for using a specific version of vala.
# @DESCRIPTION:
# This eclass sets up commonly used environment variables for using a specific
# version of dev-lang/vala to configure and build a package. It is needed for
# packages
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo