From ubuntu-bugs-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com Sun Mar 07 02:25:46 2010
Return-path: ubuntu-bugs-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com
Envelope-to: arch...@mail-archive.com
Delivery-date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 02:25:46 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx284.postini.com ([64.18.0.108] helo=psmtp.com)
by
Steve Long napsal(a):
How do others feel about such an addition?
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_a450013b143e01a25810f66ff345c9d4.xml
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key
and watch the resulting huge
bugspam landing in bug-wranglers and other people's mailboxes, it's
extremely annoying, extremely messy and generally not a good way to
things fixed.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op
for 2008.0.
Have a nice day. :P
[1] http://compsoc.dur.ac.uk/whitespace/
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piet_(programming_language)
[3] http://www.rapapaing.com/piet/
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch
regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
, what's the big issue here? Users can't use
emerge -pv output and determine what they want, or? Will we bloat the
profiles everytime someone forgets to enable a flag and goes complain
upstream about a 'missing' feature?
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http
for seems to exist for
this exact purpose? In that way, people who wish to participate in
on-topic, off-topic or straight retarded debates would still have the
choice to do so, while not forcing the majority of others to 'mark
folder as read' every 6 hours.
TIA.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto
.
:X
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
.
It seems like you aren't interested in communication with the
maintainer, otherwise you would've CC'ed me.
Erm? This was completely uncalled for, I'd say?!
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary
This ebuild has a security bug open for almost one year (Bug 142817),
plus lots of other bugs as well.
If you are interested, please see http://tinyurl.com/32webs
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch
space and vesa.
I basically think that users (As advanced Gentoo user can be) cannot
have a workable environment in a reasonable effort... I know I have
failed.
vesafb-tng works just perfectly fine here w/ nVidia/ATI/Intel. You are
doing something weird.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto
as an embedded player.
Click OK.
Could not find an appropriate hxplay or realplay in the system path to
use as an embedded player.
Click OK.
426 Transfer aborted. Data connection closed.
Stare on a blank page until you fall asleep.
Well done, Nero. :P
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL
Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
so eutils.eclass's check_license function should probably be used.
Broken until Bug 17367 is implemented. It's enough that loads of games
kill non-interactivity.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks
Mike Frysinger napsal(a):
On Friday 06 July 2007, Jakub Moc wrote:
Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
so eutils.eclass's check_license function should probably be used.
Broken until Bug 17367 is implemented.
the same exact thing could be said for everything using `built_with_use`
This check
Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
And what if they decide they don't accept the license on the first run?
Then the software won't run, very easy.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key
regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
LDAP-related, 2 DLZ related, 1 hardened.
http://tinyurl.com/3cwhjv
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
... still
Steve Long napsal(a):
welp's been away ;)
Oh well, the dreaded *buntu maintenance eats time, you know... *g*
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B
Thilo Bangert napsal(a):
It isn't different. That's the problem. If you have two packages
with the same name, you have the same problem.
On that note I would hope the vim/vi peeps would rename.
app-vim/ant
and app-vim/sudo
and app-xemacs/emerge, g
--
jakub
signature.asc
-style virtuals in place leaves the new style ones
non-fuctional, so you'd better remove them right now. ;)
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F
Ulrich Mueller napsal(a):
The Emacs team has converted the following virtual packages:
virtual/emacs
virtual/flim
to new-style (aka GLEP 37) virtuals.
Oh, and naming the new-style virtuals the same as the real thing kills
binpkgs. :/
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL
with the original maintainer over and over again,
and the conclusion was that it's not safe to have two versions of expat
installed on the same system. So, why don't we just stick to that and be
done with it?
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net
Timothy Redaelli napsal(a):
/me votes for remove them (and app-cdr/nero)
Uhm, kindly leave app-arch/rar alone; that unrar-gpl thing is just a bad
joke.
(No idea what does the rest of licenses belong to, would make sense to
post ebuilds names instead.)
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto
Carsten Lohrke napsal(a):
On Montag, 14. Mai 2007, Jakub Moc wrote:
Uhm, kindly leave app-arch/rar alone; that unrar-gpl thing is just a bad
joke.
There's app-arch/unrar, so this is no point. When unrar-gpl is so broken, why
it's in the tree?
Carsten
As the name unrar suggests
help them
themselves and compile the only original, trademarked Ion3 (C)(TM) manually.
*annoyed*
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD
Nice utility, now unfortunately a bit orphaned and with lots of open
bugs. If you are interested, see http://tinyurl.com/2mkd7s
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key
should provide ebuild for stuff that has
apparently insane upstream, instead of just dropping such junk until the
upstream guy realizes that the world doesn't spin around him.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch
Peter Gordon napsal(a):
On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 00:41 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
Well, one could ask why we should provide ebuild for stuff that has
apparently insane upstream, instead of just dropping such junk until the
upstream guy realizes that the world doesn't spin around him.
But if we
The current ebuild is outdated and there's a couple of minor issues that
are getting stale. If you are interested, see http://tinyurl.com/s8o6k
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
is not so rare at all,
unfortunately :/
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
of your point
more valid.
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
.
Haven't noticed either, maybe you could point us to where has this been
covered?
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
are going to ignore the noise pretty soon.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
On Sat, 05 May 2007 14:53:47 +0200
Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For what situation? Changing * to */* is a bunch of config files (as
far as I've been told, paludis warns about this deprecated syntax
anyway)?
If we are going to abuse critical news reporting
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
On Sat, 05 May 2007 15:15:55 +0200
Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How does it matter exactly whether it's paludis users, gcc users, php
users, apache users or whoever else who will use the news item? Let's
not misuse news framework for stuff that
Er, that's
to use
this feature for such stuff and force everyone to download this via rsync?
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
On Sat, 05 May 2007 15:48:28 +0200
Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I'm afraid that GLEP42 is missing the part that critical news
reporting does not replace documentation. You seriously intend to use
this feature for such stuff and force everyone to download
be handled that way, since paludis configs can
and do exist in home directories as well as in /etc.
Shrug; frankly just a matter of adding $HOME/.paludis/etc or whatever
(example) to CONFIG_PROTECT... Why it couldn't be done?
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature
- what are you really after here,
may I ask? I guess amne is right here.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
... still
to claim that paludis users can't read? Again; what
exactly are you after here? (And drop the 'experience has shown', 'users
want it', 'it's non-trivial' etc. etc. rhetoric please - it doesn't go
anywhere nor does it explain anything.)
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
On Sat, 05 May 2007 22:19:27 +0200
Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
On Sat, 5 May 2007 22:00:27 +0200
Wernfried Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paludis users do see the need for a news item.
Not the question if paludis users see the need
*? If they don't get the above, maybe paludis and Linux just isn't
for them and they should stick to Windows. Meanwhile there's no need to
establish a precedent of using critical news for PEBKAC issues.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks
or not
it is critical.
No no, it matters. The degree to which an unnecessary news item would
inconvenience the end user is relevant in making the decision.
Eh, something being inconvenient doesn't make the thing any more or less
critical, so yeah, it's entirely irrelevant.
--
Best regards,
Jakub
suggests it's not the case ATM.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description
On 4/29/07, William L. Thomson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 11:28 +0200, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It would be nice if there where some CD/DVD labels created, that people
could print and put on their LiveCDs/InstallCDs
?id=165629,
http://marc.info/?l=gentoo-devm=116026024223024w=2 etc.
--
Jakub Moc
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
of topic i think. Could you amplify, please?
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158197
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-nfp/msg_01213.xml
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_141498.xml
--
Jakub Moc
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. ;)
--
Jakub Moc
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
'? And why's moving them ASAP exactly
needed?
--
Jakub Moc
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
with just the
bare-bones system installed.
--
Jakub Moc
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38368
Best regards,
--
Jakub Moc
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
w/ re-assigning the keywording stuff to arches,
they are welcome to contact me and we'll sort it out. (Oh, and not
exactly my fault that you got angry because alpha has gone ahead of
mips in the slacker stats on these re-assignments, which apparently
was something you couldn't bear.)
--
Jakub Moc
the Fish!
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82772
[2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143519
[3] http://cia.vc/stats/author/peitolm
[4] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166790
[5] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134852
--
Jakub Moc
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[EMAIL
.
Even such change would piss off users. Having *no* way to turn off
tests, uuuhhh please retire me *before* someone implements this, I'm not
going to waste my time on totally pointless bugs filed by furious users.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http
Jan Kundrát napsal(a):
Jakub Moc wrote:
Even such change would piss off users. Having *no* way to turn off
tests, uuuhhh please retire me *before* someone implements this, I'm not
going to waste my time on totally pointless bugs filed by furious users.
FEATURES=-test?
... wouldn't do
... sounds like a no brainer to me
+1, this is a horrible idea that would just cause loads of bugs
impossible to check for in advance, major work for lots of people and
major bloat for no good reason. Bleh. :/
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http
plain pointless.
If the Makefiles suck, file bugs upstream instead of dumping the stuff
on Gentoo users. People are already pretty much overloaded by the tons
of various QA checks all over the place...
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net
of course it's the users who will see it, see above. It's not like
that we would have 100 volunteers around to drop everything they have in
their hands a go spend days on changing ebuilds that are not broken just
because of this idea.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
If someone can provide a good reason for changing to a system that's
more work, I'll change. If there isn't a good reason, I won't.
Maybe if you actually read the council log, you'd see the reason? yeah,
it's indeed there, believe me.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:20:46 +0200
Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
If someone can provide a good reason for changing to a system that's
more work, I'll change. If there isn't a good reason, I won't.
Maybe if you actually read
Thilo Bangert napsal(a):
this seems to come up more often than you like. is this the release
tracker bug?
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156814
kind regards
Thilo
Yeah. It's restricted to developers only, though, so not much useful for
users. :)
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
Chris Gianelloni napsal(a):
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 20:40 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
Thilo Bangert napsal(a):
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156814
Yeah. It's restricted to developers only, though, so not much useful for
users. :)
Yeah, I did that because we had users adding
://tinyurl.com/2q87ho
Open bugs only: http://tinyurl.com/2tm9mw
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
... still no signature
these days and the bugs are lingering
there for ages as noone cares; even the 2.4 kernels we still have in the
tree are pretty much unmaintained).
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key
Daniel Drake napsal(a):
Jakub Moc wrote:
- The in-kernel drivers seriously are not an equivalent alternative, let
alone the preferred one, for stuff like hda-intel or any similar drivers
that are under permanent heavy development, at least for now.
If hda-intel (or any other driver) from
Bryan Østergaard napsal(a):
Nobody is forcing anybody to use in-kernel drivers.
Uhm... http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172490
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint
still breaking users. I could care less about
fox-1.2.6-r2, having this darned virtual unmasked breaks lots more
things than fox. There's no need for official QA proclamations about this.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup
[snip]
Err, where the heck has gone the GuideXML editor project that was part
of last SoC?
(And yeah, I've heard from quite a couple of people that they are not
touching any docs because the GuideXML thing is something they'd rather
avoid like plague).
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto
search at all or don't know
how to search efficiently; so I'm not too enthusiastic that changing the
default search would significantly reduce the number of dupes... )
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115796#c4
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature
that whatever
the original issue, no change is needed on our part to resolve the
issue.
Any reasons why this would be a bad idea?
NOCHANGE sucks... If you really insist on doing anything, then use NOTABUG.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http
Kevin F. Quinn napsal(a):
[snip]
See, I don't really care how the reporter feels, if something's not a
bug, then it's not a bug. Don't invent confusing 'politically correct'
junk for this just because someone might feel 'offended'.
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, so resolving 'INVALID' a bug for people that report crap like 'oh,
my sci-mathematics/*' thingy got horribly broken with -ffast-math'
causes an offense to them? Well, that's a good thing, maybe they'll
actually use their brain
appdirs in .config too.
True, but then .config would just become cluttered with .appdirs instead!
It wouldn't become any more or less cluttered than ~/ now...
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Jeff Rollin napsal(a):
On 18/03/07, Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It wouldn't become any more or less cluttered than ~/ now...
Which is why I was saying there was no point in a ~/.config directory...
I guess you are missing the point? Fire up Midnight Commander and watch
the cruft
is the closest one to current netbeans 6.0
life cycle phase, though not accurate.
Actually stuff like cat/pkg-1.2_alpha3_pre4 is valid now and honored by
portage; dunno how does that fit the netbeans upstream scheme, though.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature
should be restricted to sane combos.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
the forums from this list please, it's
really far OT and creating a quite unproductive atmosphere.
Thanks,
Wernfried
And do the same about Sunrise, these unfounded attacks really serve no
good purpose, there's noone promoting ricing on Sunrise project.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
screwing up.
Indeed, so eroyf was told to stop screwing up, he just didn't get it
(apparently neither did you, for that matter). And don't start this
'mips needs more babysitting' nonsense here again, please.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http
Stephen Becker napsal(a):
On 3/15/07, Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah indeed, lets get the facts straight and let's see who did behave
like an asshole:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=110676action=view
Indeed both of us were assholes that day, I never denied
flooding my mailbox with such junk, *NOW*. Move
this gay debate to /dev/null or create yourself a gentoo-chat mailing
list, but stop polluting a development ML with this noise already.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup
Bryan Østergaard napsal(a):
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 03:46:47AM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
And you come here to tell us that people shouldn't get confused by these
'very few' retirements, that the sun in still shining nicely and we are
recruiting people as always? And that you will continue
the
'valuable input' provided so kindly here by ciaranm, which is so
valuable that it has cost us two developers in two days.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C
violation and demand bigger fonts on devmanual frontpage. [1]
As said, grow up.
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150231#c5
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 00:08:40 +0100 Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erm, to be precise here, noone has removed any ciaranm's attributions
from devmanual, they've all been moved to the end of the document
originally, so that people wouldn't be forced to scroll
/flame.html
Ciaranm never left, but was forced out by idiots
Well done, nice insult of lots of people. Really helpful.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1
and making a gutter of something that's supposed to be
a development mailing list?
Ugh... well done.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F
the binaries
=net-misc/nxserver-personal-1.3*
=net-misc/nxserver-personal-1.4*
=net-misc/nxserver-business-1.3*
=net-misc/nxserver-business-1.4*
=net-misc/nxserver-enterprise-1.3*
=net-misc/nxserver-enterprise-1.4*
should be removed from the tree, no way to fix the manifests.
--
Best regards,
Jakub
Danny van Dyk napsal(a):
What about making custom-cflags default in the base profile?
Uhm? Maybe re-read the description of the flags? It's unsupported and
breaks stuff, that's why the use flag exists...
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http
Mohammed Hagag napsal(a):
amarok-1.4.5 doesn't install any thing except the .po files when
emerging without the kde USE flag, is this normal ?
No, it's not normal, and no, this is not a proper place. We have
bugzilla for such things (see Bug 167536).
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto
on this, but if some arch can't act for over a year, they deserve to get
the keywords dropped and get their deptree broken, sorry. Not
maintainers' fault that noone has cared enough.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:30:43 +0100 Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| - I'm *not* demanding anything from *arch teams*, the bugs are for
| *maintainers* of those packages. I've already told you couple of
| times, why are you making these misleading statements yet
broken
on a regular basis.
Oh, there's nothing like attacking someone for someone else's fault.
Won't waste my time on your trollish rants any more.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key
Alexander Færøy napsal(a):
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 07:50:02PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
Eh? Why should I stop filing bugs about stale vulnerable cruft? Should
it stay in the tree forever (unless some $we_all_know_which_arch dev
wakes up by miracle and moves)?
If you give away enough
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 21:33:59 +0100 Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| So, what are you blaming me for here? Grrr.
Misassigning or premature filing, as you prefer.
Oh sure... Next time, blame me for Sept 11, keep amusing us by your
bullshit.
--
Best regards
. Sorry, enough babysitting here, either devs can read or they
shouldn't have commit access.
Period.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717
# to replace more than one mode do something like this
#replace=(
# 4d 1280 768 24
# 5c 1400 1050 16
#)
/snip
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1
by providing different baselayout
packages; one tailored for embedded systems that only have busybox,
one for general purpose use, etc. That's what the virtual is for,
isn't it?
+1
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup
of version bumps and couple of other bugs that need
some loving.
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
... still
Alec Warner napsal(a):
Jakub Moc wrote:
Danny van Dyk napsal(a):
which breaks the metadata cache. Any objections to change it
to
SLOT=0
As noted on the relevant bug [1], the eclass is a complete no-op and
nothing can be installed using this eclass (has been so for quite some
time
1 - 100 of 391 matches
Mail list logo
