2010-03-22 22:12:54 Jacob Godserv napisał(a):
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:11, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
2010-03-20 01:51:44 Duncan napisał(a):
So let's just recognize that it's not a perfect situation, create a news
item saying that python-3 will soon
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis posted on Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:37:34
+0100 as excerpted:
2010-03-22 22:12:54 Jacob Godserv napisał(a):
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:11, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
2010-03-20 01:51:44 Duncan napisał(a):
So let's just
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:11, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
2010-03-20 01:51:44 Duncan napisał(a):
So let's just recognize that it's not a perfect situation, create a news
item saying that python-3 will soon (give a date) be unmasked, and suggest
that users
Duncan wrote:
...
++ - I can only add the saying With freedom comes great responsibility..
Maybe the python herd could maintain a little status page which covers
informations like:
- Estimated python 3 compatibility in respect to the packages in the
main tree.
- Recommendations if installing
On 03/19/2010 08:26 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de wrote:
You guys always make easy decisions so complicated. :P
Masking a package is not complicated.
Yes, that's why all the heated debates about Python 3 exist, because
it's all so
fre 2010-03-19 klockan 05:13 -0500 skrev Dale:
Because, when I installed gcc 4.3, I could then unmerge the old gcc.
That's why I didn't complain about that. With python, we still have to
have the current version plus the new version which is not being used at
all.
That was if you did
On 03/20/2010 02:56 AM, Jean-Marc Hengen wrote:
Duncan wrote:
...
++ - I can only add the saying With freedom comes great responsibility..
Maybe the python herd could maintain a little status page which covers
informations like:
- Estimated python 3 compatibility in respect to the
I have a question related to this:
If I have package X which supports python2 and python 3, and I install
it without python3 installed it will only install python2-files
(i.e. /usr/lib/python2.x/*), right?
What happens if I later install packages Y that is only python3, and
relies on the python3
2010-03-20 13:51:37 Peter Hjalmarsson napisał(a):
I have a question related to this:
If I have package X which supports python2 and python 3, and I install
it without python3 installed it will only install python2-files
(i.e. /usr/lib/python2.x/*), right?
What happens if I later install
2010-03-20 01:51:44 Duncan napisał(a):
So let's just recognize that it's not a perfect situation, create a news
item saying that python-3 will soon (give a date) be unmasked, and suggest
that users not needing it may wish to package.mask it themselves, with a
link to documentation with
On 03/19/2010 10:57 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:54:28 -0500
Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:17:17 +0100
Ben de Grootyng...@gentoo.org wrote:
Because it is extremely useless to the great majority of users.
Most packages
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote:
On 03/19/2010 10:57 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:54:28 -0500
Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:17:17 +0100
Ben de Grootyng...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dale posted on Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:13:48 -0500 as excerpted:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:23:31 -0500
Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
It's being installed because it's a dependency of something you use.
Replace Python with any other library and we wouldn't be having
13 matches
Mail list logo
