Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

В Птн, 29/10/2010 в 17:51 +0200, Diego Elio Pettenò пишет: > Il giorno ven, 29/10/2010 alle 12.12 +0400, Peter Volkov ha scritto: > > > > Please, hard mask beta versions. To fix this bug it's not hard to > > backport patch (patch referenced in bug) and this will give us good > > version to stabili

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

В Птн, 29/10/2010 в 19:29 +0200, Michał Górny пишет: > On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:12:38 +0400 > Peter Volkov wrote: > > Please, hard mask beta versions. > > I personally don't see a reason why he needed to do that. > If a particular package was a popular one and/or the beta version > changed a lot w

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

On 15:46 Fri 29 Oct , Thomas Sachau wrote: > Which raises the question, if those people, who want to install a > minimal server will mostly use apache or something different. And > especially for minimal setups, i dont think that apache will be the > first choice, so i agree with the removal

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86/net-misc/aggregate: aggregate-1.6.ebuild

On 20:54 Thu 28 Oct , Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 10/28/2010 07:22 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > > Your committing this way actually supports the thought that you have > > something to hide, because you don't document what you did, and you > > didn't update the ChangeLog reducing overal visibilit

Re: [gentoo-dev] Support for Python 3

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29-10-2010 23:24, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > 2010-10-26 02:45:10 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto napisał(a): >> On 25-10-2010 13:37, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: >>> I would like to suggest that setting Python 3.1 as main

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 07:29:07PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote: > On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:12:38 +0400 > Peter Volkov wrote: > > > Please, hard mask beta versions. > > I personally don't see a reason why he needed to do that. > If a particular package was a popular one and/or the beta version > ch

Re: [gentoo-dev] Support for Python 3

2010-10-26 02:45:10 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto napisał(a): > On 25-10-2010 13:37, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > > I would like to suggest that setting Python 3.1 as main active version of > > Python be officially > > supported and recommended for Gentoo developers since 2010-12-01.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Support for Python 3

2010-10-25 19:16:56 Thilo Bangert napisał(a): > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis said: > > 2010-10-25 15:50:23 Peter Volkov napisał(a): > > > В Пнд, 25/10/2010 в 15:37 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis > пишет: > > > > I would like to suggest that setting Python 3.1 as main active > >

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: qdevelop and hmake

# Samuli Suominen (29 Oct 2010) # Fails to compile with Qt 4.7, project appears dead # http://bugs.gentoo.org/338489 # Removal in 30 days dev-util/qdevelop # Samuli Suominen (29 Oct 2010) # Bugs 124544, 241624 and 255822 # Masked for removal in 30 days dev-haskell/hmake

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code-In: 13-18 year olds in open source

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29-10-2010 20:46, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > As you can see in the link for the current proposals, I've proposed a > general task of providing translations of our documentation for Portuguese. > I have a very strong suspicion that most if n

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code-In: 13-18 year olds in open source

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 26-10-2010 04:19, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Hi all, > We're looking for tasks that would take a student 13-18 years old > roughly 1-3 days to complete. Ideas might include writing man pages, > translating a few webpages, perhaps some relatively st

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:12:38 +0400 Peter Volkov wrote: > Please, hard mask beta versions. I personally don't see a reason why he needed to do that. If a particular package was a popular one and/or the beta version changed a lot which might imply a lot of users getting trouble due to it, then I w

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

On 10/29/10 6:29 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > Furthermore the message about glibc-2.4 and gcc-4.1 looks rather obsolete. > At least this part has to be removed/changed Fine for me. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 09:11:33AM -0700, Alec Warner wrote: > 'Anyone wanting to run a secure server profile should use hardened' > tends to imply that the server profile is insecure which is probably > not what you intend to convey to users. Hardened is likely more > secure (which is all we can

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:02:20PM +, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hi. >> >> On 29-10-2010 11:03, Markos Chandras wrote: >> > Hi >> > >> > I don't know how many of you are u

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:12:38 +0400 Peter Volkov wrote: > В Птн, 29/10/2010 в 06:03 +, Jeroen Roovers (jer) пишет: > > jer 10/10/29 06:03:08 > > > > Modified: ChangeLog > > Added:tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild > > Log: > > Beta version bump, fixes buf

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Rafael Goncalves Martins wrote: > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote: >> Am 29.10.2010 14:13, schrieb Petteri Räty: >>> On 29.10.2010 15.02, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: >>> > 2) Furthermore I would like to drop the following use f

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: dev-lang/v8 SONAME

Il giorno ven, 29/10/2010 alle 11.02 +0200, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." ha scritto: > > By the way, what do you think about > ? Last I checked it was unfortunately unreliable because it still relied on developers describing their inte

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

Il giorno ven, 29/10/2010 alle 12.12 +0400, Peter Volkov ha scritto: > > Please, hard mask beta versions. To fix this bug it's not hard to > backport patch (patch referenced in bug) and this will give us good > version to stabilize. Really don't abuse beta versions. > It vastly depends how "beta"

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote: > Am 29.10.2010 14:13, schrieb Petteri Räty: >> On 29.10.2010 15.02, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: >> >>> 2) Furthermore I would like to drop the following use flags from default IUSE >>> -apache2 -ldap >>> A minim

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code-In: 13-18 year olds in open source

On 23:19 Mon 25 Oct , Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Based on our participation in the Summer of Code, Google invited us to > apply for their revived program for 13-18 year olds called Google > Code-In [1-2]. The basic idea is that students will complete a series of > small tasks rather than one h

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

Am 29.10.2010 14:13, schrieb Petteri Räty: > On 29.10.2010 15.02, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > >> >>> 2) Furthermore I would like to drop the following use flags from default >>> IUSE >> >>> -apache2 >>> -ldap >> >>> A minimal server installation does requires neither apache2 nor ldap >> >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:02:20PM +, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi. > > On 29-10-2010 11:03, Markos Chandras wrote: > > Hi > > > > I don't know how many of you are using these profiles. I would like to > > propose a couple of chan

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

On 29.10.2010 15.02, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > >> 2) Furthermore I would like to drop the following use flags from default >> IUSE > >> -apache2 >> -ldap > >> A minimal server installation does requires neither apache2 nor ldap > > Although one can install a server without apache or

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: global USE lzma

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 14:02, justin wrote: > Currently there are ten packages using lzma in their USE and its always > used for the same purpose, providing support for lzma compression. And > as lzma compression gets more and more popular the number will increase. > What do you think about movin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi. On 29-10-2010 11:03, Markos Chandras wrote: > Hi > > I don't know how many of you are using these profiles. I would like to > propose a couple of changes > > 1) I want to drop the warning message located on profile.bashrc files > e.g $PORTDIR/de

[gentoo-dev] RFC: global USE lzma

Hi all, Currently there are ten packages using lzma in their USE and its always used for the same purpose, providing support for lzma compression. And as lzma compression gets more and more popular the number will increase. What do you think about moving the USE to a global scope? justin Curren

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

On 10/29/10 1:24 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 01:18:14PM +0200, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: >>> ewarn "This profile has not been tested thoroughly and is not considered to >>> be" >>> ewarn "a supported server profile at this time. For a supported server" If the above is n

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 01:18:14PM +0200, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > On 10/29/10 1:03 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > > 1) I want to drop the warning message located on profile.bashrc files > > e.g $PORTDIR/default/linux/amd64/10.0/server/profile.bashrc > > It is more than obvious what this profile

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

On 10/29/10 1:03 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > 1) I want to drop the warning message located on profile.bashrc files > e.g $PORTDIR/default/linux/amd64/10.0/server/profile.bashrc > It is more than obvious what this profile is for so I don't think this > message makes any sense. > ewarn "This profil

[gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

Hi I don't know how many of you are using these profiles. I would like to propose a couple of changes 1) I want to drop the warning message located on profile.bashrc files e.g $PORTDIR/default/linux/amd64/10.0/server/profile.bashrc It is more than obvious what this profile is for so I don't think

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: freqtweak, mplinuxman, padevchooser

# Samuli Suominen (29 Oct 2010) # freqtweak, bug 336160, uses obsolete exgtk # mplinuxman, bug 338863, for old MP3 players, overflows buffers # padevchooser, bug 341191, doesnt work with new pulseaudio # Masked for removal in 30 days media-sound/freqtweak app-misc/mplinuxman media-sound/padevchoos

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-lang/v8 SONAME

* "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." (phajdan...@gentoo.org) wrote: > I'm curious: do you have some more ebuilds using v8? It'd be great to > add them to the portage tree at some point, if possible. Or maybe > sunrise overlay... We took the easy way out and chose Debian because v8/nodejs were packaged when we

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-lang/v8 SONAME

On 10/27/10 8:59 PM, James Rowe wrote: > * "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." (phajdan...@gentoo.org) wrote: >> There is one issue that keeps dev-lang/v8 in hard mask and prevents its >> broader usage (I think www-client/chromium could start using it). > > Thanks for working on this. I use v8 quite a bit, and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: dev-lang/v8 SONAME

On 10/27/10 1:05 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > Il giorno mer, 27/10/2010 alle 12.49 +0200, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." ha > scritto: >> Some context first. Upstream does not promise any binary compatibility >> between releases, so each version has a different SONAME, if any. > > That's a good approach (

Re: [gentoo-dev] Message could not be delivered

Patrick Nagel dixit (2010-10-29, 15:26): > On 2010-10-29 18:05 UTC cl...@jhcloos.com wrote: > [garbage, malware attached] > > Wow, that's a first, I think ;) Mydoom worm sent to the gentoo-dev list. I only got information from spamassassin on my server. Was actually quite surprised to see the se

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

В Птн, 29/10/2010 в 06:03 +, Jeroen Roovers (jer) пишет: > jer 10/10/29 06:03:08 > > Modified: ChangeLog > Added:tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild > Log: > Beta version bump, fixes buffer overflow (bug #336605). Please, hard mask beta versions. To fix th

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eshowkw

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dne 29.10.2010 05:51, Jeroen Roovers napsal(a): > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:33:09 +0200 > Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> So now on the eshowkw is part of gentoolkit (in svn, and in next >> release). If y

Re: [gentoo-dev] Message could not be delivered

On 2010-10-29 18:05 UTC cl...@jhcloos.com wrote: [garbage, malware attached] Wow, that's a first, I think ;) Mydoom worm sent to the gentoo-dev list. -- Key ID: 0x86E346D4http://patrick-nagel.net/key.asc Fingerprint: 7745 E1BE FA8B FBAD 76AB 2BFC C981 E686 86E3 46D4 signature.asc D